DOCSLIB.ORG

Sector 2 Hydrology and Hydraulics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sector 2 Hydrology and Hydraulics SECTOR 2 HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS SUPPORTING REPORT SECTOR 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTOR 2. Hydrology and hydraulics .................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Hydrology...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Outline of Pyanj River Basin ............................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Hydro-Meteorological Data ............................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Runoff Characteristic of Pyanj River Basin....................................... 2-5 2.1.4 Runoff Analysis ................................................................................. 2-8 2.1.5 Recommendations for Hydro-Meteorological Observations ............. 2-13 2.2 Hydraulics...................................................................................................... 2-17 2.2.1 Verification of Data of Khrimanjo Station......................................... 2-17 2.2.2 Estimation of Flood Discharge in Hamadoni..................................... 2-18 2.2.3 Prospect of Riverbed Fluctuation in Hamadoni................................. 2-19 2.2.4 Riverbed Material Survey .................................................................. 2-20 2.2.5 Riverbed Variation Analysis in Alluvial Fan...................................... 2-21 2.2.6 Riverbed Variation Analysis around Spur Dike ................................. 2-32 2.3 Flood Forecasting System ............................................................................. 2-37 2.3.1 Present Situation ................................................................................ 2-37 2.3.2 Forecasting Procedure........................................................................ 2-38 2.3.3 Necessary Facilities for Flood Monitoring and Forecasting.............. 2-40 2.3.4 Setting of Beginning of Snowmelt and Flood Seasons...................... 2-41 2.3.5 Setting of Warning Levels.................................................................. 2-41 References .............................................................................................................. 2-45 Tables Figures Annexes i LIST OF TABLES IN REPORT Table R 2.1.1 Parameter of Main Rivers.................................................................................. 2-1 Table R 2.1.2 Location of Meteorological Stations ................................................................. 2-3 Table R 2.1.3 Location of Hydrological Stations..................................................................... 2-4 Table R 2.1.4 Catchment Area in Hydrological Stations ......................................................... 2-6 Table R 2.1.5 Comparison of Catchment Areas and Runoff Volume in 2005 ......................... 2-6 Table R 2.1.6 Snow Coverage Area in Each Month ................................................................ 2-7 Table R 2.1.7 Evaporation at Rushan Station .......................................................................... 2-9 Table R 2.1.8 Monthly Average of Sun Radiation ................................................................... 2-10 Table R 2.1.9 Result of Parameter Calibration ........................................................................ 2-12 Table R 2.1.10 Peak Discharge of Five Biggest Floods at Chubek ........................................... 2-13 Table R 2.1.11 Interval of Hydrological Observatories on Pyanj Mainstream.......................... 2-14 Table R 2.1.12 Necessary Equipment for Existing and Proposed Observatories ...................... 2-14 Table R 2.1.13 Necessary Equipment for Existing and Proposed Observatories ...................... 2-16 Table R 2.2.1 Peak Discharge Ratio by Runoff Simulation..................................................... 2-18 Table R 2.2.2 Probable Discharge............................................................................................ 2-19 Table R 2.2.3 Contents of Riverbed Material Survey.............................................................. 2-20 Table R 2.2.4 Flow Ratio between the Discharge along the Dike and at Chubek ................... 2-24 Table R 2.2.5 Days in Discharge Scale.................................................................................... 2-26 Table R 2.2.6 Impact to Afghanistan Area............................................................................... 2-29 Table R 2.2.7 Maximum Difference of Riverbed Variation..................................................... 2-31 Table R 2.3.1 Forecast of Water Volumes of Pyanj River in 2006 (April-September) ............ 2-37 Table R 2.3.2 The Time Required for Discharge Increasing of Large Scale Floods................ 2-43 LIST OF FIGURES IN REPORT Fig. R 2.1.1 Location of Meteorological Stations ................................................................. 2-3 Fig. R 2.1.2 Location of Hydrological Stations..................................................................... 2-4 Fig. R 2.1.3 Conceptual Diagram of Snow Melting Routine and Runoff Model.................. 2-8 Fig. R 2.1.4 Depth-Area Curves for Reducing Point Rainfall to Obtain Areal Average Value 2-9 Fig. R 2.1.5 Proposed Sites of New Hydrological Observatories ......................................... 2-15 Fig. R 2.1.6 Proposed Sites of New Meteorological Observatories...................................... 2-17 Fig. R 2.2.1 Distribution of Average Particle Size ................................................................ 2-21 Fig. R 2.2.2 Interpolation of Ground Level........................................................................... 2-24 Fig. R 2.2.3 Distribution of Flow Velocity and Depth along Dike........................................ 2-28 Fig. R 2.2.4 Distribution of Depth and Flow Velocity in the Vicinity of Metintugay........... 2-32 Fig. R 2.2.5 The Model of Spur Dike.................................................................................... 2-34 Fig. R 2.2.6 Velocity Distribution ......................................................................................... 2-36 Fig. R 2.3.1 Flow Chart of Flood Forecasting of the Characteristics Model ........................ 2-38 Fig. R 2.3.2 Radio Water Level Sensor ................................................................................. 2-40 Fig. R 2.3.3 Superimposing of Hydrographs......................................................................... 2-41 Fig. R 2.3.4 Image of Warning Level Setting........................................................................ 2-43 ii LIST OF TABLES AT THE BACK OF REPORT Table 2.1.1 Meteorological Data Availability ...................................................................... T-2-1 Table 2.1.2 Hydrological Data Availability y....................................................................... T-2-2 Table 2.1.3 Specific Discharge ............................................................................................ T-2-3 Table 2.1.4 Catchment Area of Sub-Basins ......................................................................... T-2-4 Table 2.1.5 Catchment Area in Each Altitude Zone............................................................. T-2-5 Table 2.2.1 Annual Flood Peak Series ................................................................................. T-2-6 Table 2.2.2 Results of Riverbed Material Survey ................................................................ T-2-7 Table 2.2.3 Comparison of the Interval of Spur Dike.......................................................... T-2-9 Table 2.2.4 Comparison of the Angle of Spur Dike............................................................. T-2-10 Table 2.2.5 Comparison of the Length of Spur Dike ........................................................... T-2-11 Table 2.2.6 Comparison of the Scale of Flow Discharge..................................................... T-2-12 LIST OF FIGURES AT THE BACK OF REPORT Fig. 2.1.1 Pyanj River System........................................................................................... F-2-1 Fig. 2.1.2 Organization Chart of Tajikmeteorology........................................................... F-2-2 Fig. 2.1.3 Precipitation Distribution.................................................................................. F-2-3 Fig. 2.1.4 Timing of Peak Discharge Appearance ............................................................. F-2-4 Fig. 2.1.5 Degree Day Factor of Five Large Small Flood in Khorog................................ F-2-5 Fig. 2.1.6 Comparison of Runoff Volume and Degree Day Factor in Khorog.................. F-2-6 Fig. 2.1.7 Snow Coverage Area......................................................................................... F-2-7 Fig. 2.1.8 Difference in Temperature................................................................................. F-2-10 Fig. 2.1.9 Sub-Basin Map of Panj River ........................................................................... F-2-11 Fig. 2.1.10 Schematic Model for Pyanj River Basin........................................................... F-2-12 Fig. 2.1.11 Result of Calibration at Khirmanjo ................................................................... F-2-13 Fig. 2.1.12 Result of Calibration at Khorog ........................................................................ F-2-15 Fig. 2.1.13 Runoff Result at Chubek................................................................................... F-2-17 Fig. 2.2.1 Secular Variation of Cross Section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Und Leute 22
    Vorwort 11 Herausragende Sehenswürdigkeiten 12 Das Wichtigste in Kurze 14 Entfernungstabelle 20 Zeichenlegende 20 LAND UND LEUTE 22 Tadschikistan im Überblick 24 Landschaft und Natur 25 Gewässer und Gletscher 27 Klima und Reisezeit 28 Flora 29 Fauna 32 Umweltprobleme 37 Geschichte 42 Die Anfänge 42 Vom griechisch-baktrischen Reich bis zur Kushan-Dynastie 47 Eroberung durch die Araber und das Somonidenreich 49 Türken, Mongolen und das Emirat von Buchara 49 Russischer Einfluss und >Great Game< 50 Sowjetische Zeit 50 Unabhängigkeit und Burgerkrieg 52 Endlich Frieden 53 Tadschikistan im 21. Jahrhundert 57 Regierung 57 Wirtschaftslage 58 Kritik und Opposition 58 Tourismus 60 Politisches System in Theorie und Praxis 61 Administrative Gliederung 63 Wirtschaft 65 Bevölkerung und Kultur 69 Religionen und Minderheiten 71 Städtebau und Architektur 74 Volkskunst 77 Sprache 79 Literatur 80 Musik 85 Brauche 89 http://d-nb.info/1071383132 Feste 91 Heilige Statten 94 Die tadschikische Küche 95 ZENTRALTADSCHIKISTAN 102 Duschanbe 104 Geschichte 104 Spaziergang am Rudaki-Prospekt 110 Markt und Mahalla 114 Parks am Varzob-Fluss 115 Museen 119 Denkmaler 122 Duschanbe live 128 Duschanbe-Informationen 131 Die Umgebung von Duschanbe 145 Festung Hisor 145 Varzob-Schlucht 148 Romit-Tal 152 Tal des Karatog 153 Wasserkraftwerk Norak 154 Das Rasht-Tal 156 Ob-i Garm 158 Gharm 159 Jirgatol 159 Reiseveranstalter in Zentral­ tadschikistan 161 DER PAMIR 162 Das Dach der Welt 164 Ein geografisches Kurzportrait 167 Die Bewohner des Pamirs 170 Sprache und Religion 186 Reisen
    [Show full text]
  • REACT Meeting Minute
    Committee of Emergency Situations & Civil Defense, ECHO and UNDP Tajikistan Project “Strengthened Disaster Risk Management in Tajikistan” Minutes of the REACT Meeting 12 March 2010, UN Conference Hall Chair: Mr. Khaybullo Latipov, Chairman, Committee of Emergency Situations and Civil Defense (CoES) Participants: REACT partners (Annex I- attached) 1. Introduction Mr. Latipov, opened the meeting and welcomed all the participants. 2. Government recovery action plan in Vanj district: • Committee of Emergency Situations and Civil Defense Mr. Latipov, chairman of CoES, briefed participants that following the earthquake occurred in Vanj district on January 2nd, 2010, overall 5 different meetings with REACT partners have been convened covering issues related to Vanj earthquake response and recovery operations: 1) January 5, 2010 – Extraordinary REACT meeting; 2) January 8, 2010 – Meeting with the first deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs; 3) January 20, 2010 – Regular REACT meeting; 4) February 10, 2010 – Regular REACT meeting; 5) February 18, 2010 – Early Recovery Planning meeting. As of disaster occurrence date up to this date, following response measures have been undertaken by the Government of Tajikistan: - Governmental Commission under the chairmanship of Prime Minister has visited the disaster site on January 2010; - Assessment of the caused damage has been conducted; - Affected households identified and list finalized; - Delivery of tents to the disaster site organized; - Land plot identified for relocation of the population and engineering-geological assessment conducted; - Master Plan of the new settlement, design of the water supply and electricity supply system developed; Mr. Latipov announced that representatives of specialized state agencies, responsible for recovery actions in Vanj district have been invited to the meeting and passed the floor to invited representatives for more detailed briefing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Tajikistan Ministry of Energy and Industry
    The Republic of Tajikistan Ministry of Energy and Industry DATA COLLECTION SURVEY ON THE INSTALLMENT OF SMALL HYDROPOWER STATIONS FOR THE COMMUNITIES OF KHATLON OBLAST IN THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FINAL REPORT September 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency NEWJEC Inc. E C C CR (1) 12-005 Final Report Contents, List of Figures, Abbreviations Data Collection Survey on the Installment of Small Hydropower Stations for the Communities of Khatlon Oblast in the Republic of Tajikistan FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Summary Chapter 1 Preface 1.1 Objectives and Scope of the Study .................................................................................. 1 - 1 1.2 Arrangement of Small Hydropower Potential Sites ......................................................... 1 - 2 1.3 Flowchart of the Study Implementation ........................................................................... 1 - 7 Chapter 2 Overview of Energy Situation in Tajikistan 2.1 Economic Activities and Electricity ................................................................................ 2 - 1 2.1.1 Social and Economic situation in Tajikistan ....................................................... 2 - 1 2.1.2 Energy and Electricity ......................................................................................... 2 - 2 2.1.3 Current Situation and Planning for Power Development .................................... 2 - 9 2.2 Natural Condition ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TAJIKISTAN TAJIKISTAN Country – Livestock
    APPENDIX 15 TAJIKISTAN 870 км TAJIKISTAN 414 км Sangimurod Murvatulloev 1161 км Dushanbe,Tajikistan / [email protected] Tel: (992 93) 570 07 11 Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term regional control strategy (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) 1206 км Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran 3 651 . 9 - 13 November 2008 Общая протяженность границы км Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term Regional control strategy (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) TAJIKISTAN Country – Livestock - 2007 Territory - 143.000 square km Cities Dushanbe – 600.000 Small Population – 7 mln. Khujand – 370.000 Capital – Dushanbe Province Cattle Dairy Cattle ruminants Yak Kurgantube – 260.000 Official language - tajiki Kulob – 150.000 Total in Ethnic groups Tajik – 75% Tajikistan 1422614 756615 3172611 15131 Uzbek – 20% Russian – 3% Others – 2% GBAO 93619 33069 267112 14261 Sughd 388486 210970 980853 586 Khatlon 573472 314592 1247475 0 DRD 367037 197984 677171 0 Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term Regional control strategy Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term Regional control strategy (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) Country – Livestock - 2007 Current FMD Situation and Trends Density of sheep and goats Prevalence of FM D population in Tajikistan Quantity of beans Mastchoh Asht 12827 - 21928 12 - 30 Ghafurov 21929 - 35698 31 - 46 Spitamen Zafarobod Konibodom 35699 - 54647 Spitamen Isfara M astchoh A sht 47
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank the STATE STATISTICAL COMMITTEE of the REPUBLIC of TAJIKISTAN Foreword
    The World Bank THE STATE STATISTICAL COMMITTEE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN Foreword This atlas is the culmination of a significant effort to deliver a snapshot of the socio-economic situation in Tajikistan at the time of the 2000 Census. The atlas arose out of a need to gain a better understanding among Government Agencies and NGOs about the spatial distribution of poverty, through its many indicators, and also to provide this information at a lower level of geographical disaggregation than was previously available, that is, the Jamoat. Poverty is multi-dimensional and as such the atlas includes information on a range of different indicators of the well- being of the population, including education, health, economic activity and the environment. A unique feature of the atlas is the inclusion of estimates of material poverty at the Jamoat level. The derivation of these estimates involves combining the detailed information on household expenditures available from the 2003 Tajikistan Living Standards Survey and the national coverage of the 2000 Census using statistical modelling. This is the first time that this complex statistical methodology has been applied in Central Asia and Tajikistan is proud to be at the forefront of such innovation. It is hoped that the atlas will be of use to all those interested in poverty reduction and improving the lives of the Tajik population. Professor Shabozov Mirgand Chairman Tajikistan State Statistical Committee Project Overview The Socio-economic Atlas, including a poverty map for the country, is part of the on-going Poverty Dialogue Program of the World Bank in collaboration with the Government of Tajikistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Miocene Exhumation of the Pamir Revealed by Detrital Geothermochronology of Tajik Rivers C
    TECTONICS, VOL. 31, TC2014, doi:10.1029/2011TC003040, 2012 Miocene exhumation of the Pamir revealed by detrital geothermochronology of Tajik rivers C. E. Lukens,1 B. Carrapa,1,2 B. S. Singer,3 and G. Gehrels2 Received 4 October 2011; revised 6 February 2012; accepted 26 February 2012; published 18 April 2012. [1] The Pamir mountains are the western continuation of the Tibetan-Himalayan system, the largest and highest orogenic system on Earth. Detrital geothermochronology applied to modern river sands from the western Pamir of Tajikistan records the history of sediment source crystallization, cooling, and exhumation. This provides important information on the timing of tectonic processes, relief formation, and erosion during orogenesis. U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircons and 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology of white micas from five rivers draining distinct tectonic terranes in the western Pamir document Paleozoic through Cenozoic crystallization ages and a Miocene (13–21 Ma) cooling signal. Detrital zircon U-Pb ages show Proterozoic through Cenozoic ages and affinity with Asian rocks in Tibet. The detrital 40Ar/39Ar data set documents deep and regional exhumation of the Pamir mountains >30 Myr after Indo-Asia collision, which is best explained with widespread erosion of metamorphic domes. This exhumation signal coincides with deposition of over 6 km of conglomerates in the adjacent foreland, documenting high subsidence, sedimentation, and regional exhumation in the region. Our data are consistent with a high relief landscape and orogen-wide exhumation at 13–21 Ma and correlate with the timing of exhumation of the Pamir gneiss domes. This exhumation is younger in the Pamir than that observed in neighboring Tibet and is consistent with higher magnitude Cenozoic deformation and shortening in this part of the orogenic system.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability Assessment Bartang
    Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Central Asia Vulnerability of High Mountain Ecosystems to Climate Change in Tajikistan’s Bartang Valley – Ecological, Social and Economic Aspects – with references to the project region in Kyrgyzstan Greifswald, December 2015 Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Central Asia Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Central Asia Vulnerability of High Mountain Ecosystems to Climate Change in Tajikistan’s Bartang Valley – Ecological, Social and Economic Aspects – with references to the project region in Kyrgyzstan Jonathan Etzold with contributions of Qumriya Vafodorova (Camp Tabiat) and Dr. Anne Zemmrich Michael Succow Foundation for the Protection of Nature Ellernholzstraße 1/3, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)3834 - 83542-18 Fax: +49 (0)3834 - 83542-22 E-mail: [email protected] www.succow-stiftung.de Cover picture: Darjomj village in Tajikistan © Jonathan Etzold Michael Succow Foundation for the Protection of Nature Content 1. Glossary and abbreviations of terms and transcription used in the text ............................................... 6 1.1 Glossary & abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Transcription................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Introduction and scope of the report .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FIRST NATIONAL REPORT ON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Dushanbe – 2003 1 REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FIRST NATIONAL REPORT ON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Dushanbe – 2003 3 ББК 28+28.0+45.2+41.2+40.0 Н-35 УДК 502:338:502.171(575.3) NBBC GEF First National Report on Biodiversity Conservation was elaborated by National Biodiversity and Biosafety Center (NBBC) under the guidance of CBD National Focal Point Dr. N.Safarov within the project “Tajikistan Biodiversity Strategic Action Plan”, with financial support of Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Copyright 2003 All rights reserved 4 Author: Dr. Neimatullo Safarov, CBD National Focal Point, Head of National Biodiversity and Biosafety Center With participation of: Dr. of Agricultural Science, Scientific Productive Enterprise «Bogparvar» of Tajik Akhmedov T. Academy of Agricultural Science Ashurov A. Dr. of Biology, Institute of Botany Academy of Science Asrorov I. Dr. of Economy, professor, Institute of Economy Academy of Science Bardashev I. Dr. of Geology, Institute of Geology Academy of Science Boboradjabov B. Dr. of Biology, Tajik State Pedagogical University Dustov S. Dr. of Biology, State Ecological Inspectorate of the Ministry for Nature Protection Dr. of Biology, professor, Institute of Plants Physiology and Genetics Academy Ergashev А. of Science Dr. of Biology, corresponding member of Academy of Science, professor, Institute Gafurov A. of Zoology and Parasitology Academy of Science Gulmakhmadov D. State Land Use Committee of the Republic of Tajikistan Dr. of Biology, Tajik Research Institute of Cattle-Breeding of the Tajik Academy Irgashev T. of Agricultural Science Ismailov M. Dr. of Biology, corresponding member of Academy of Science, professor Khairullaev R.
    [Show full text]
  • International Development Association
    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: PAD3295 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 26.8 MILLION (US$37 MILLION EQUIVALENT) Public Disclosure Authorized TO THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FOR THE TAJIKISTAN SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESILIENCE STRENGTHENING PROGRAM May 30, 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice Europe and Central Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective April 30, 2019) Currency Unit = SDR SDR 0.722 = US$1 US$ 1.385 = SDR 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1–December 31 Regional Vice President: Cyril E. Muller Country Director: Lilia Burunciuc Senior Global Practice Director: Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Practice Manager: Kevin Tomlinson Task Team Leader(s): Robert Wrobel, Gloria La Cava ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AKDN Agha Khan Development Network PDO project development objective BFM beneficiary feedback mechanism PIU project implementation unit CAE centers for additional education CASA-1000 Central Asia South Asia Electricity PPSD Project Procurement Strategy Transmission and Trade Project Document CDD community-driven development POM Project Operations Manual CPF Country Partnership Framework REDP Rural Economy Development CYAS Committee for Youth Affairs and Project Sports under the Government of REP Rural Electrification Project the Republic of Tajikistan RMR Risk Mitigation Regime CSP community support project RSP Resilience Strengthening Program DHS Demographic and Health Survey RRA Risk and Resilience Assessment DFID U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Geowatch December 2007, Issue 34
    GeoWatch December 2007, Issue 34 Table of Contents • Keynote: GeoSIG Celebrates 15th Year ...................................................................................................................................1 • Earthquake Monitoring System Above 3’200 m Altitude, Lake Sarez, Tajikistan .....................................................................1 • Latest Features and Improvements in GeoDAS.......................................................................................................................3 • EVACES’07 was held during 24-26 October 2007, Porto, Portugal .........................................................................................7 Keynote: GeoSIG Celebrates 15th Year We are proudly celebrating our 15th year. Within these 15 years, starting from a vision, we have strongly grown to a large, well-known, worldwide family with all of our customers, representatives, affiliates, employees and suppliers. We believe that it is our family that brings the best out of us by encouraging, demanding, listening, questioning, teaching, learning, researching and most importantly responsibly valuing all that we are standing for. Many of our liaisons are more than just business links which enabled GeoSIG to deliver optimum products, solutions and services with the best value regarding any specific requirement. With this opportunity we would most frankly like to thank to everyone that have contributed to the development and strength of this family and its continuing success towards many new endeavours. We like to smile with you… Earthquake Monitoring System Above 3’200 m Altitude, Lake Sarez, Tajikistan A massive landslide triggered by a strong earthquake in 1911 became a large dam along the Murghob River in the Pamir mountains of Tajikistan, now called the Usoi Dam. Lake sarez is the resulting lake that is formed above surrounding drainages at an elevation greater than 3200m. The lake is about 56 km long, 3.5 km wide and 500 m deep, which holds an estimated 17 km3 of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 7 Tajikistan Prisoner List 2016
    APPENDIX 7 TAJIKISTAN PRISONER LIST 2016 BIRTH DATE OF THE NO. NAME DATE RESIDENCY RESPONSIBILITIES ARREST COMMENTS 1 Saidumar Huseyini 1961 Dushanbe Political council member and the 09.16.2015 Various extremism (Umarali Khusaini) first deputy chairman of the Islamic charges. Case went to the Renaissance Party of Tajikistan (IRPT) Constitutional Court on 9 February 2016. 2 Muhammadalii Hayit 1957 Dushanbe Political council member and 09.16.2015 Various extremism deputy chairman of IRPT charges. Case went to the Constitutional Court on 9 February 2016. 3 Vohidkhon Kosidinov 1956 Dushanbe Political council member and 09.17.2015 Various extremism chairman of the charges. Case went to the elections department of IRPT Constitutional Court on 9 February 2016. 4 Fayzmuhammad 1959 Dushanbe IRPT chairman of research, 09.16.2015 Various extremism Muhammadalii political council member charges. Case went to the Constitutional Court on 9 February 2016. 5 Davlat Abdukahhori 1975 Dushanbe IRPT foreign relations, 09.16.2015 Various extremism political council member charges. Case went to the Constitutional Court on 9 February 2016. 6 Zarafo Rahmoni 1972 Dushanbe IRPT chairman advisor, 09.16.2015 Various extremism political council member charges. Case went to the Constitutional Court on 9 February 2016. 7 Rozik Zubaydullohi 1946 Dushanbe IRPT academic chairman, 09.16.2015 Various extremism political council member charges. Case went to the Constitutional Court on 9 February 2016. 8 Mahmud Jaloliddini 1955 Hisor District IRPT chairman advisor, 02.10.2015 political council member 9 Hikmatulloh 1950 Dushanbe Editor of “Najot” newspaper, 09.16.2015 Various extremism Sayfullozoda IRPT political council member charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Decentralization in the Republic of Tajikistan: Progress Made, Key Considerations, and the Way Forward
    Fiscal decentralization in the Republic of Tajikistan: Progress made, key considerations, and the way forward Prepared by Paul Bernd Spahn Dushanbe - 2014 Fiscal Fiscal decentralization in the Republic of Tajikistan T The World Bank Table of Content Preface ..................................................................................................... 4 A. Introduction ......................................................................................... 4 B. The structure of the public sector in Tajikistan ......................................... 5 C. Political deconcentration of State powers ................................................. 7 1. Executive and legislative authorities at local levels ................................. 7 2. The assignment of functions to lower tiers of government ..................... 11 a. Expenditure functions .................................................................... 11 b. Revenue functions ......................................................................... 13 c. Equalization .................................................................................. 18 3. Summary of section ......................................................................... 22 D. The budget process: decentralization or deconcentration? ....................... 23 1. The structure of the Republican budget ............................................... 23 4. Public financial management (PFM) .................................................... 26 5. Preparing the budget .......................................................................
    [Show full text]