Attachments for Measure J Growth Management

1 City of Orinda Measure J Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist for Calendar Years 2018 and 2019 Supplementary Information – Attachments

Table of Contents 1. Lamorinda Action Plan ...... 2

1.a. Resolution 61‐19 Adoption of Connect Orinda Downtown Master Plan ...... 96

3.a.1. 2018 Housing element Report, April 9, 2019 ...... 100

3.a.2. 2019 Housing element Report, April 15, 2020 ...... 118

3.c. Ordinances for walking, biking and transit access ...... 134

6. CIP, 7‐21‐2020, abridged for Transportation projects ...... 137

7. TSM Ordinance – Resolution 00‐06 ...... 233

9. Measure J Growth Management Element, Resolution 19‐09 ...... 248

12.1. LSM Annual Report, FY 2017‐18 ...... 257

12.2. LSM Annual Report, FY 2018‐19 ...... 260

Lamorinda Action Plan

Final

Prepared by:

1970 Broadway, Suite 740 Oakland, CA 94612

September 2017

1 Introduction ...... 1 1.1 The Action Plan ...... 2 1.2 2014 Action Plan ...... 3 1.3 Outline of the Document ...... 5

2 Action Plan Framework ...... 7 2.1 Statements of Vision, Goals and Policies ...... 7 2.2 Routes of Regional Significance ...... 9 2.3 Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes ...... 10 2.4 Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) and Performance Measures ...... 11

3 Existing Transportation Conditions ...... 18 3.1 Routes of Regional Significance ...... 18 3.1.1 State Route 24 (SR-24) ...... 18 3.1.2 BART ...... 22 3.1.3 Pleasant Hill Road ...... 22 3.1.4 Camino Pablo / San Pablo Dam Road ...... 23 3.2 Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes ...... 23 3.2.1 Moraga Way ...... 23 3.2.2 Moraga Road ...... 24 3.2.3 Mount Diablo Boulevard (Happy Valley Road to Brown Avenue) ...... 24 3.2.4 Lafayette-Moraga Regional Trail ...... 24 3.3 Monitoring Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives ...... 24 3.4 Transit Service ...... 26 3.4.1 BART ...... 26 3.4.2 County Connection ...... 27 3.4.3 Paratransit ...... 29

4 Overall Growth Rates and Future Travel Patterns ...... 31 4.1 Population Forecasts ...... 32 4.2 Employment Forecasts ...... 33 4.3 Traffic Forecasts ...... 34 4.4 Forecasts of MTSO Values for 2040 ...... 35

5 Actions for Routes of Regional Significance ...... 38 5.1 Actions ...... 39 5.2 Preliminary Analysis Results of Actions ...... 55 5.3 Gateway Constraint Policy ...... 55 5.4 Gateway Policies for Specific Routes ...... 56 5.5 Traffic Management Strategies ...... 58

6 Financial Plan ...... 60 6.1 Overview of the Financial Plan ...... 60 6.2 Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program (STMP) ...... 62

7 Procedures for Notification, Review, and Monitoring ...... 64 7.1 Notification Regarding Development Applications and Environmental Documents ...... 64 7.2 Review of General Plan Amendments ...... 68 7.3 Action Plan Monitoring and Review ...... 69 7.4 Process for Addressing MTSO Exceedances ...... 69

Appendix A: Detailed MTSO Monitoring Values and Forecasts for the Lamorinda Action Plan ...... 71

Appendix B: Detailed Segment-Level Analysis of Route Characteristics and Needs ...... 81 Lamorinda Secondary Routes of Regional Significance ...... 82 Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes ...... 84

ii 6

Figure 1: Lamorinda Routes of Regional Significance ...... 9 Figure 2: Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes ...... 11 Figure 3: 2013 and 2040 AM Peak Period Westbound Origin-Destination Summary ...... 20 Figure 4: 2013 and 2040 AM Peak Period Eastbound Origin-Destination Summary ...... 21 Figure 5: BART System Map ...... 22 Figure 6: Average Annual Weekday Exits at Orinda and Lafayette BART stations ...... 26 Figure 7: County Connection System Map (Lamorinda area) ...... 27 Figure 8: Annual Ridership for County Connection Lamorinda Bus Routes ...... 28 Figure 9: FY 2012 Ridership for County Connection Lamorinda Service, by Bus Route ...... 28 Figure 10: FY 2012 Ridership for County Connection Lamorinda Service, by Age Group ...... 29 Figure 11: Annual Paratransit Ridership in Lamorinda ...... 30 Figure 12: Households by Area, 2013 to 2040 ...... 33 Figure 13: Employment by Area, 2013 to 2040 ...... 34 Figure 14: Locations of Lamorinda Gateways ...... 56 Figure 15: Action Plan Review Process for Lamorinda GPAs and Projects ...... 67

Table 1: MTSOs for Routes of Regional Significance ...... 13 Table 2: Performance Measures for Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes ...... 16 Table 3: Status of MTSOs of Routes of Regional Significance ...... 25 Table 4: Lamorinda Demographic Forecasts ...... 32 Table 5: Lamorinda Population, Households, Employed Residents and Employment Forecasts ...... 32 Table 6: Lamorinda Employed Residents Distribution Profile ...... 33 Table 7: Lamorinda Employment Forecast ...... 34 Table 8: Traffic Forecasts for Select Routes of Regional Significance and Interjurisdictional Routes ...... 35 Table 9: Assessment of MTSO Values for 2013 and 2040 ...... 37 Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions ...... 41 Table 11: Examples of Developments Meeting the 50 Net Peak Hour Trip Threshold ...... 66 Table A-1: Lamorinda MTSOs based on Projections 2011 ...... 72 Table A-2: SR 24 Eastbound Freeway Segment Analysis –Delay Index ...... 73 Table A-3: SR 24 Westbound Freeway Segment Analysis –Delay Index ...... 74 Table A-4: San Pablo Dam Road Northbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index ...... 75 Table A-5: San Pablo Dam Road Southbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index ...... 76 Table A-6: Pleasant Hill Road Northbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index ...... 77

iii 7

Table A-7: Pleasant Hill Road Southbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index ...... 78 Table A-8: BART Loading Factor ...... 79 Table A-9: Side-Street Intersection Delay...... 80

iv 8

1 INTRODUCTION

The 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan assesses regional transportation issues within the Lamorinda area and outlines a recommended package of vision statements, goals, policies, objectives, and actions for addressing those issues. The study area includes Moraga, Lafayette, Orinda, and portions of unincorporated Contra Costa. In addition to serving as a guide for transportation planning through 2040, the Plan also fulfills one of several requirements under the Measure J Growth Management Program that local jurisdictions participate in a multi-jurisdictional, cooperative planning process, which includes the preparation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance. The recommendations in this Plan and its counterparts in the other subareas of Contra Costa (West, Central, East County, and the Tri-Valley) will be carried forward into the 2014 Update to the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) prepared by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). The Lamorinda Action Plan, combined with the one for the Tri-Valley (which

1 9

includes the Contra Costa jurisdictions of Danville, San Ramon, and Contra Costa County), will be forwarded through the Southwest Area Transportation Committee (SWAT) to CCTA, for inclusion in the 2014 CTP Update. The Lamorinda Program Management Committee (LPMC) is comprised of one elected official from each of the three Lamorinda jurisdictions, and serves as the policy oversight board for the planning and implementation of Measure C/J projects and programs. A Technical Advisory Committee (the LPMC-TAC), comprised of staff from each locality, provides technical input to the LPMC.

1.1 The Action Plan In 1988, Contra Costa County voters approved Measure C, a one-half percent local sales tax that generated $1 billion (2008 dollars) in funding for transportation projects and programs over 20 years. Measure C also created the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), with a board of 11 elected officials and 3 ex-officio members to guide the expenditure of the sales tax proceeds in accordance with the voter-approved expenditure plan. In 2004, the voters of Contra Costa approved Measure J, extending the sales tax for 25 years through 2034, and generating an additional $2 billion (2008 dollars). Both Measures C and J have included an innovative Growth Management Program (GMP) that encourages local jurisdictions to participate in a cooperative, multi-jurisdictional planning process, and among other things, establish flexible, Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) for Regional Routes. The CCTA allocates 18 percent of the sales tax revenue it receives to local jurisdictions that are found to be in compliance with the Growth Management Program. Under Measure J, an additional 5 percent of total sales- tax revenues are available to local jurisdictions for Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) projects, subject also to GMP compliance. As part of the cooperative planning process envisioned under Measure C/J, “Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance” are to be developed by the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC) with input from the local jurisdictions. The LPMC serves as a sub-group to the SWAT committee. Under Measures C/J, the SWAT committee, which is comprised of the Lamorinda jurisdictions and Contra Costa County, the Town of Danville, and the City of San Ramon, is the designated RTPC that reports to CCTA on policy matters relating to transportation issues within both Lamorinda and the Tri-Valley. The overall objective of the Action Plans is to give local jurisdictions an opportunity to cooperatively set goals, objectives, and actions to mitigate the cumulative impacts of growth on the regional transportation system. To be found in compliance with the CCTA’s GMP, local jurisdictions are required to

2 10

participate in the development of the Action Plans, and also be willing to implement the actions, programs, projects, and measures identified within the Plans.

1.2 2014 Action Plan In 1995, the LPMC developed and adopted the first Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance. While this document included area-wide actions for Lamorinda, its primary focus was on the State Route 24 (SR-24) corridor, which at that time was the only regional route identified by the LPMC. Subsequently, both Pleasant Hill Road, north of SR-24, and Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road were designated, which lead to the preparation of Action Plans for those routes in 1998. The Action Plan for the Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road corridor, which connects West County to Lamorinda, was prepared jointly with the West County RTPC (called WCCTAC). The Pleasant Hill Road Action Plan was prepared by the City of Lafayette, and approved by LPMC in 1998. The Lamorinda Action Plan was updated in 2000 to incorporate the new plans for Pleasant Hill Road, north of SR-24, and the Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road, along with other changes regarding the SR-24 corridor. The last update to the Lamorinda Action Plan in 2009 was incorporated into CCTA’s 2009 CTP Update. Since the last Action Plan update in 2009, new demographic data has become available and the countywide travel forecasts have been updated. MTC also updated its Regional Transportation Plan (Plan Bay Area) in 2013, which incorporated many of the elements of the 2009 Action Plan updates and the 2009 CTP Update. These and other events have triggered the need to undertake a comprehensive update to the Lamorinda Action Plan to reflect these changes in traffic and policy. During the course of the 2014 Update, the LPMC reviewed and updated several major elements of the Action Plan, including the Statements of Vision, Goals and Policies; Routes of Regional Significance; Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives; Actions; the Subregional Transportation Impact Fee; and Development Review Procedures. These elements of the Action Plan are defined as follows: Statements of Vision, Goals and Policies of an Action Plan help guide its overall direction. Decisions regarding investments, program development, and development approvals are based on these policies. Routes of Regional Significance are transportation facilities or services that: 1. Connect two or more “regions” of Contra Costa County; 2. Cross County boundaries; 3. Carry a significant amount of through-trips; and

3 11

4. Provide access to a regional highway or transit facility (e.g., a BART station or freeway interchange) that serves regional mobility and connect multiple jurisdictions. CCTA may designate a Route of Regional Significance that meets one or more of these criteria. Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes. LPMC has also designated a new category of route called Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes. While these routes do not warrant designation as Routes of Regional Significance, they do cross jurisdictional boundaries, and would benefit from the multi-jurisdictional planning process envisioned in Measure J. The purpose of this designation is to identify the need for interjurisdictional planning for these routes. It was not the intention of the LPMC that this designation be a stepping stone to designation as Routes of Regional Significance at a later time. Rather, it is the LPMC’s intent that this designation provide a structured forum for collaboration among the three jurisdictions, with final control of the routes remaining with the local jurisdiction. It is also the intent of the LPMC that the local jurisdictions have an opportunity to “opt out” of the designation at any time for the portion of any of the routes within their own boundary. Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) are quantifiable measures of performance and effectiveness that include a target date for attaining the objective. MTSOs may include, for example, average peak-hour speeds, peak-period congestion duration, roadway level of service, transit loading, or transit service frequency. MTSOs can also represent targets for system utilization and efficiency such as transit ridership, mode shares, or average vehicle occupancy. In this Action Plan update, additional performance measures have also been added for Secondary Routes of Regional Significance and for Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes to help the LPMC identify the need for additional actions for the routes to which they apply. Target values for each performance measure have not yet been specified and could be the topic for future LPMC discussion and inclusion in the next Action Plan update. The performance measures do not qualify as MTSOs because no target value has been specified or because the performance measure is being used for a route that is not designated as a Route of Regional Significance and therefore, not subject to Measure J requirements and guidelines. Actions are the specific steps (actions, measures, projects, and programs) that the local jurisdictions and other regional partner agencies such as Caltrans, BART, County connection or CCTA have agreed to implement to achieve the transportation goals, objectives, and policies set forth in the Action Plan. The party responsible for carrying out the actions is identified as the local jurisdictions, the RTPC, or other affected parties. Actions may involve

4 12

implementing specific projects at the local level, or they may call for regional cooperation among the local jurisdictions and adjoining RTPCs. Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program (STMP) is the subregional fee or other mitigations program required under Measure C/J, and designed to mitigate the traffic impacts of new developments on the regional transportation system. Lamorinda implements its STMP through a subarea developer fee that is overseen by the Lamorinda Fee and Financing Authority (LFFA), a Joint Exercise of Powers Authority (JEPA) comprised of elected officials from each jurisdiction within Lamorinda. Development Review Procedures. The CCTA Growth Management Implementation Guide includes a process for review and consultation on projects and general plan amendments that could generate traffic impacts on the transportation system. As described further in Chapter 7, the CCTA also requires local participation in a General Plan Amendment (GPA) review procedure. This 2014 Update carries forward and refines these development review procedures, which were included in the previous Action Plans.

1.3 Outline of the Document This introductory section (Chapter 1) to the Plan presents a brief history of the Action Plan concept and its relevance to transportation planning in Lamorinda. Chapter 2 of this document describes the review of statements of vision, goals and policies that was undertaken and presents a revised set of statements to guide the 2014 Action Plan. This chapter identifies the Routes of Regional Significance and the newly identified Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes. The chapter also identifies the MTSOs and supplemental performance measures that have been specified for each Route of Regional Significance and suggests performance measures for each Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route. Chapter 3 provides a description of the existing transportation conditions in Lamorinda. An assessment of the MTSOs from 2013 monitoring is used to indicate the current status of Lamorinda with respect to the Action Plan. A forecast of future population, employment and transportation conditions is presented in Chapter 4 for the year 2040. In this chapter an assessment of the MTSOs for the Routes of Regional Significances is provided for the 2040 forecast for a baseline condition that assumes that only currently funded transportation improvements are in place. Chapter 5 of the report defines the key elements of the 2014 Action Plan. This includes an updated description of actions intended to achieve the MTSOs for the Routes of Regional Significance. The actions include projects and programs specifically designed to implement policies and meet goals on individual Routes

5 13

of Regional Significance and Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes. For each action, the agency or agencies responsible for implementing the action is identified. The financial plan for meeting the needs of the Action Plan is presented in Chapter 6. This includes a brief description of the existing funding sources that support the Action Plan projects and programs and the Subregional Traffic Impact Fee Program designed to implement “regionally significant projects” in the Action Plan. Chapter 7 provides guidance on implementation of the Action Plan, including the procedures for circulation of environmental documents and review of General Plan Amendments (GPAs). The chapter also includes the process for monitoring and review of the Action Plan.

6 14

2 ACTION PLAN FRAMEWORK

2.1 Statements of Vision, Goals and Policies Statements of vision, goals and policies from the previous Action Plan were reviewed in light of recent changes in regional policies and plans and those of the local Lamorinda jurisdictions. The vision, goals, and policies for the 2014 Action Plan are as follows: 1. Preserve and enhance the semi-rural character of the community. 2. Pursue actions to meet or sustain Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs). 3. Support actions that help achieve environmental goals, through participation in countywide, regional, and statewide transportation improvement plans. 4. Avoid the addition of roadway capacity for single-occupant vehicles. 5. Enhance mobility by providing alternative mode options.

7 15

6. Pursue actions to make transit more attractive and increase transit ridership. 7. Improve multimodal access to BART in ways that will not lead to an increase in the use of BART parking by people driving into Lamorinda from outside communities. 8. Pursue actions to improve safety of travelers using any mode of travel. 9. Coordinate local land use planning and regional transportation planning. 10. Encourage through-trips and interregional travel to stay on freeways and discourage diversion of these trips to arterial and local streets as a mechanism for ensuring intraregional mobility. 11. Maintain capacity constraints at selected gateways with the intent of preserving and improving mobility on Routes of Regional Significance within Lamorinda. 12. Pursue efficiency improvements, such as signal timing and other operational improvements, especially those that help side street traffic and buses, but without compromising pedestrian and bicycle safety. 13. Support the implementation of the Complete Streets Policies of the Lamorinda jurisdictions. 14. Support programs and actions that will improve mobility to, from and within the Lamorinda communities’ downtowns.

8 16

2.2 Routes of Regional Significance As indicated in Figure 1, the Lamorinda Action Plan identifies four Routes of Regional Significance:  SR-24 – From the Caldecott tunnel on the west end to the interchange with I-680 on the east end.  Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) – For service to and from the Orinda and Lafayette stations. This is a new designation in the 2014 Action Plan with the intent to assure high quality service to those who use the Orinda and Lafayette station, not to include major transportation infrastructure.  Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road – From Moraga Way just south of SR-24 to Inspiration Trail on the north.  Pleasant Hill Road – from the SR-24 interchange on the south to Taylor Blvd on the north. Figure 1: Lamorinda Routes of Regional Significance

9 17

Within Lamorinda, the four Routes of Regional Significance have been further differentiated by their role within the county. SR-24 and BART are identified as “Primary” Routes of Regional Significance because they are high-capacity, high- volume facilities designed to serve longer-distance trips between Lamorinda and other sub-regions as well as trips though Lamorinda. Pleasant Hill Road (between Taylor Boulevard and SR-24) and Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road are designated as “Secondary” Routes of Regional Significance. They provide a linkage between Lamorinda and other sub-regions and they also provide access to major regional facilities (SR-24 and BART), but they are not designed to carry high volumes and are designed to serve the residential neighborhoods and schools along them.

2.3 Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes Four additional routes have also been designated by the LPMC as “Interjurisdictional Routes.” While these routes do not warrant designation as Routes of Regional Significance, they do cross jurisdictional boundaries, and would benefit from the multi-jurisdictional planning process envisioned in Measure J. It is not the intent or expectation that this designation would serve as a stepping stone towards designation as a Route of Regional Significance. This designation will allow the LPMC to monitor the performance of these routes and work cooperatively to specify projects and programs to increase the safety and reliability of the routes while increasing multimodal mobility within Lamorinda. The designation is also intended to help the Lamorinda jurisdictions maintain the existing character, function, and use of the routes. Cooperatively defining projects that will help the Lamorinda area may also improve the chances of receiving funding for the projects from countywide or regional grant programs. LPMC and the individual Lamorinda jurisdictions will determine the implication of this designation rather than SWAT or CCTA. Interjurisdictional Routes would remain under the classification of “non-regional routes” under the Measure J Growth Management Implementation Guidelines and would be exempt from the requirements that apply to Routes of Regional Significance. In that way, this designation preserves the Lamorinda jurisdictions’ ability to maintain the existing character, function, and use of the routes and does not restrict the authority of the local jurisdiction to manage their own facilities. With this designation, the local jurisdictions would not experience any loss of control over the routes within their boundaries. Decisions by the LPMC about the Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes would have to have the support of the jurisdiction(s) affected by the decision. Each jurisdiction would also have the opportunity to opt out of the designation for the portion of a Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route within its boundaries.

10 18

The four Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes are as follows:  Moraga Way – From Moraga Road on the south end to Bryant Way on the north end.  Moraga Road – From Moraga Way on the south end to Mount Diablo Boulevard on the north end.  Mount Diablo Boulevard – From Happy Valley Road on the west end to Brown Avenue on the east end.  Lafayette-Moraga Regional Trail1 – For the entire length of the trail within Lamorinda. A map of the four Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes is provided in Figure 2. Figure 2: Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes

2.4 Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) and Performance Measures Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) are measures that can be used to monitor the performance of each of the Routes of Regional Significance. For Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes, Performance Measures have been identified. The Measure J Implementation Guide defines MTSOs as quantifiable

1 The Lafayette-Moraga Trail is to retain its existing use restrictions. Designation as a Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes is not intended to imply any possible change in purpose or use.

11 19

measures of effectiveness that include a target date for achieving the objective. MTSOs should specify the standards or levels of performance desired by the LPMC and the local jurisdictions. MTSOs can also help the LPMC determine when improvement projects or programs are needed to achieve a desired level of performance for a route. MTSOs are monitored each time an Action Plan is updated and values are forecast for a target year at least 25 years in the future. For this Action Plan, MTSOs in place in the 2009 Action Plan were monitored in 2013 and values forecast to 2040. Additional performance measures have also been identified for the Secondary Routes of Regional Significance and for the Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes. Data will be collected for these measures in a joint effort by CCTA and the local jurisdictions to provide indicators of how well the routes are currently performing. They are not considered MTSOs and for most, no target values for performance have been identified. This may be done at a later time once values have been estimated for the existing conditions for each route. For any performance measure for the Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes, there are no penalties or required procedures for not meeting the target value. They are meant only to guide the LPMC and the local jurisdiction in identifying appropriate actions for the routes. As performance measures, they will be used by the local jurisdictions and LPMC to plan for actions that will improve the safety and multimodal mobility of the routes. Table 1 identifies the MTSOs and additional performance measures for the Routes of Regional Significance. Table 2 identifies the performance measures for the Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes.

12 20

Table 1: MTSOs for Routes of Regional Significance

Route of Regional MTSOs Significance 1. Maintain a Delay Index (DI) of 2.0 (2.5 after 2030) or lower on the SR-24 corridor between I-680 and the Caldecott Tunnel during peak hour in the peak commute direction including freeway on-ramps.2 The DI is a ratio of peak period travel time to off- SR-24 peak period travel time. A Delay Index of 2.0 indicates that the trip would take twice as long during the peak hour as during the uncongested off- peak. 2. Maintain a Delay Index (DI) of 1.5 or less for all but the six most congested hours of the day. 1. Maintain an hourly average loading factor (ratio of passengers to seats) of 1.5 or less approaching Lafayette Station westbound and Orinda Station eastbound during each and every hour of service. An BART hourly averaging loading factor of 1.5 indicates that the number of passengers served during the hour is fifty percent greater than the number of seats available during that hour.

2 Monitoring or modeling of Delay Index should be for the entire length of corridor. The measurements should be made inside any points of capacity constraint imposed by either a gateway constraint policy or traffic management strategies designed to limit the flow of vehicles into the corridor. Doing so will insure that the effects of the gateway constraint policy or traffic management strategies are reflected in the MTSO values.

13 21

Table 1: MTSOs for Routes of Regional Significance

Route of Regional MTSOs Significance 1. Maintain peak hour peak direction delay index of 2.0 or lower. 2. Maintain a maximum wait time for drivers on side streets wishing to access Pleasant Hill Road or Taylor Boulevard of one signal cycle or less. 3. Increase the average vehicle occupancy on Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Boulevard to at least 1.3 during the peak commute hours by 2018. Pleasant Hill 4. Maintain a peak-hour level of service of “Good D”4 Road3 or better at signalized intersections consistent with the Lafayette General Plan for intersections not in the downtown area except at the gateways to the Action Plan area such as Rancho View Drive. Additional Performance Measures 5. Maintain an inventory of available pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 6. Monitor vehicle crash frequency. 7. Monitor pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency.

3 Regarding Pleasant Hill Road, the listed MTSOs can potentially conflict with one another, as maintaining a maximum wait time of one cycle or fewer on the side street can lead to an increase in the delay index on Pleasant Hill Road or the level of service at a signalized intersection. In this case, the MTSO addressing maximum wait time for drivers on side streets takes precedence. The City of Lafayette’s preference, per its General Plan, is to accommodate local traffic over through traffic. 4 “Good D” reflects an average delay per vehicle of 25 to 33 seconds, as defined in the City of Lafayette’s General Plan.

14 22

Table 1: MTSOs for Routes of Regional Significance

Route of Regional MTSOs Significance 1. Maintain peak hour peak direction delay index of 2.0 or lower. 2. The maximum wait time for drivers on side streets wishing to access San Pablo Dam Road or Camino Pablo should be no greater than one signal cycle. 3. Increase the average vehicle occupancy on Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road to at least 1.3 during the Camino Pablo/ San Pablo Dam peak commute hours by 2018. Road Additional Performance Measures 4. Maintain an inventory of available pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 5. Monitor vehicle crash frequency. 6. Monitor pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency. 7. Monitor the frequency and cause of unplanned lane closures of any type.

15 23

Table 2: Performance Measures for Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Performance Measures Route 1. Maintain an inventory of available pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 2. Monitor vehicle crash frequency. 3. Monitor pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency Moraga Way 4. Monitor the frequency and cause of unplanned lane closures of any type. 5. Maintain peak hour peak direction delay index of 2.0 or lower. 1. Maintain an inventory of available pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 2. Monitor vehicle crash frequency. 3. Monitor pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency 4. Maintain peak hour peak direction delay index of 2.0 or lower. 5. Achieve and maintain a peak-hour level of service of 6 Moraga Road5 “Poor D” or better at signalized intersections within downtown Lafayette consistent with the Lafayette General Plan for intersections in the downtown area. 6. Maintain a maximum wait time for drivers on side streets wishing to access Moraga Road at any signalized intersection between Herman Drive /St. Mary’s Road and Mount Diablo Boulevard of one signal cycle or fewer.

5 As with the MTSOs, when there is a potential conflict between the performance measure for wait time for drivers on side streets and the delay index or the level of service at a signalized intersection within Lafayette, the maximum wait time for drivers on side streets takes precedence because the City of Lafayette’s preference, as per its General Plan, is to accommodate local traffic over through traffic. 6 “Poor D” reflects an average delay per vehicle of 33 to 40 seconds, as defined in the City of Lafayette’s General Plan.

16 24

Table 2: Performance Measures for Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Performance Measures Route 1. Maintain an inventory of available pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 2. Monitor vehicle crash frequency. 3. Monitor pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency. 4. Maintain peak hour peak direction delay index of 2.0 or lower. Mount Diablo Boulevard 5. Maintain a peak hour level of service “Poor D” or better at signalized intersections within downtown Lafayette consistent with the Lafayette General Plan for intersections in the downtown area. 6. Maintain a maximum wait time for drivers on side streets wishing to access Mount Diablo Boulevard at any signalized intersection of one signal cycle or fewer. 1. Monitor pedestrian and bicycle volumes at crossings. 2. Monitor auto volumes at crossings. Lafayette- 3. Monitor average trail user delay at major road Moraga crossings. Regional Trail 4. Monitor pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency at crossings. 5. Monitor pavement condition over the entire trail.

17 25

3 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS

This section describes existing transportation conditions in Lamorinda including those of major roadways and transit services.

3.1 Routes of Regional Significance 3.1.1 State Route 24 (SR-24) SR-24 is a major freeway connection serving Central Contra Costa County, the Lamorinda area, and Alameda County, and carries between an average of 150,000 and 188,000 vehicles per day (2012 Caltrans ADT). In Contra Costa

18 26

County, the freeway runs from the I-680 interchange in Walnut Creek to the Caldecott Tunnel, and traverses the Lamorinda communities. Within this segment, there are generally four travel lanes in each direction with no high- occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes. To access Lamorinda, there are seven interchanges between I-680 and the Caldecott tunnel, and they are located at Pleasant Hill Road, Deer Hill Road/Oak Hill Road/First Street, Acalanes Road/El Nido Ranch Road, St. Stephens Drive, Camino Pablo, Gateway Boulevard, and Fish Ranch Road. BART runs within the center median of the SR- 24 right-of-way. In 1990, Lamorinda contributed 30 percent of all westbound AM peak period traffic through the Caldecott Tunnel. Since 1990, travel patterns have changed dramatically on SR-24. As shown in Figure 3, that number had dropped to 18 percent by 2013, as substantial growth has occurred in Central County and East County. This growth to the east of the corridor has led to an increase in congestion intensity and duration along SR-24. The Lamorinda contribution to traffic on SR-24 is expected to remain fairly stable in the next few decades decreasing to only 17 percent by 2040. In the eastbound direction, 41 percent of 2013 trips through the I-680/SR-24 interchange originated in Lamorinda and the percentage of these trips is projected to decrease slightly to 38 percent in 2040. Figure 4 illustrates the origins and destinations for eastbound AM peak period traffic on SR-24 for 2013 and 2040. The comparison indicates that the contribution of Lamorinda traffic will decrease from 41 percent to 38 percent while though traffic will increase. The biggest increase will come from Oakland and other parts of Central Alameda County. The largest increase in destinations for the eastbound traffic will be Concord and other parts of Central Contra Costa County as a result of the first phase of the Concord Naval Weapons Station reuse and other development in that area. The travel patterns in Figures 3 and 4 are based on results of the CCTA Countywide Transportation Model and reflect vehicle trips during the peak periods in 2013 and 2040. Travel in the corridor also includes person-trips by BART and people getting rides with other people, but they are not included in the travel patterns in Figures 3 and 4. Some work trips are also not made every day because of telecommuting, which is growing in popularity in the Lamorinda Area. These additional trips and travel characteristics are captured reasonably well in the Countywide Transportation Model and the forecasts for traffic on individual roadways, but cannot be incorporated in the origin-destination analysis for traffic on SR-24.

y r

m m

o i

a n

: 2

20 28

und

eak

2040

013

: 2

21 29

3.1.2 BART BART provides service to Lamorinda on the C line, which provides service between Pittsburg/Bay Point, Concord, Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Orinda, Oakland, San Francisco, Daly City, Colma, South San Francisco, San Bruno, the San Francisco Airport, and Millbrae. The line has connections to three of BART’s other lines in Oakland. Ridership in 2012, as measured by daily exits at the two Lamorinda stations, exceeded 6,000 passengers. A map showing the BART system is presented in Figure 5. Figure 5: BART System Map

Source: http://www.bart.gov, July 2013. BART provides service on the C line between 4:00 AM and 1:30 AM on weekdays with service every 5 to 10 minutes in the peak period (6:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and every 15 to 20 minutes in the off-peak period. Service is provided on Saturdays between 6:00 AM and 1:30 AM and on Sunday between 8:00 AM and 1:30 AM. 3.1.3 Pleasant Hill Road Connecting the cities of Martinez, Pleasant Hill, and Walnut Creek to Lafayette, Pleasant Hill Road is a major four-lane, north-south arterial that intersects with SR-24 roughly 1.5 miles west of I-680. Pleasant Hill Road is designated as a Route of Regional Significance south of Taylor Boulevard terminating at the SR-24 Interchange south of Deer Hill Road/Stanley Boulevard.. Pleasant Hill Road is

22 30

also a Route of Regional Significance within the Central County subregion north of Lafayette. The traffic volume on Pleasant Hill Road, based on a traffic count conducted in 2010 just south of Reliez Valley Road, was 1,992 vehicles in the southbound direction and 764 vehicles in the northbound direction during the AM peak hour. In the PM peak hour, the volume was 1,010 vehicles in the southbound direction and 2,222 vehicles in the northbound direction. Using 2012 turning movement counts, the City of Lafayette estimates that the two-way daily traffic volume just south of Reliez Valley Road is 28,700 vehicles. Two schools, Springhill Elementary and Acalanes High School, are served by the roadway. There is currently no transit service offered on Pleasant Hill Road north of Stanley Boulevard. Prior to the reconstruction of the I-680 / SR-24 interchange in 1999, Pleasant Hill Road carried significant through traffic that bypassed the congested interchange. Once the project was completed, traffic volumes and congestion dropped off but have recently been on the increase once again. 3.1.4 Camino Pablo / San Pablo Dam Road Camino Pablo is a major arterial that begins just south of SR-24 in downtown Orinda and runs north serving Orinda Village and turning into San Pablo Dam Road at the Bear Creek Road intersection. The traffic volumes on San Pablo Dam Road, based on a traffic count conducted in 2010 north of Orinda, was 1,126 vehicles in the southbound direction and 359 vehicles in the northbound direction during the AM peak hour. In the PM peak hour, the volume was 484 vehicles in the southbound direction and 945 vehicles in the northbound direction. The roadway serves the SR-24 interchange as well as the Orinda BART station, and ultimately connects to Richmond and I-80 in western Contra Costa County. AC Transit Route 74 operates along this corridor.

3.2 Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes 3.2.1 Moraga Way Moraga Way is a north-south arterial that intersects with SR-24 roughly 2.5 miles east of the Caldecott Tunnel and connects to Camino Pablo. Three schools - Miramonte High School, Orinda Intermediate School, and Del Rey Elementary School - are served by the roadway. The roadway connects residential communities and St. Mary’s College to SR-24 and the Orinda BART station as well as the downtown commercial areas of Moraga and Orinda, both of which are designated as Priority Development Areas. County Connection Route 6 operates along this corridor.

23 31

3.2.2 Moraga Road Moraga Road is a north-south arterial that intersects with Mount Diablo Boulevard and extends south into the Town of Moraga. Five schools - Lafayette Elementary School, Stanley Middle School, Campolindo High School, St. Perpetua School, and Donald Rheem Elementary - are served by the roadway. Moraga Road also provides access to Saint Mary’s College although the college is not on Moraga Road. The roadway connects residential communities to SR-24 and the Lafayette BART station as well as the downtown commercial areas of Moraga and Lafayette, both of which are designated as Priority Development Areas, and the Rheem commercial area. County Connection Route 6 operates along this corridor. 3.2.3 Mount Diablo Boulevard (Happy Valley Road to Brown Avenue) Mount Diablo Boulevard is an arterial that runs parallel to SR-24 between Acalanes Road and Pleasant Hill Road, serving the downtown area of Lafayette, the Lafayette BART station, and almost all of the city’s commercial districts. Only the portion of Mount Diablo Boulevard between Happy Valley Road and Brown Avenue is designated as a Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route. The roadway serves as a parallel route for vehicles diverting from SR-24 during periods of congestion. Although the roadway does not connect to another jurisdiction, it is interjurisdictional in terms of use. The section of Mount Diablo Boulevard in Downtown Lafayette is used for SR-24 access from the residential communities to the south. Downtown Lafayette’s Y-shaped street network is such that the SR- 24 eastbound freeway exit is located at Oak Hill Road and eastbound freeway entrance is located at 1st Street, both of which meet Mount Diablo Boulevard. Vehicles entering or exiting SR-24 westbound coming from or going to the south would exit onto Deer Hill Road and use either 1st Street or Oak Hill Road to do so. The main road south of Mount Diablo Boulevard is Moraga Road, which is between Oak Hill Road and 1st Street. Regarding transit service, County Connection Route 25 operates along this corridor. 3.2.4 Lafayette-Moraga Regional Trail The Lafayette-Moraga Regional Trail is a north-south, 7.7-mile long, linear park intended for pedestrian, equestrian, and bicycle use. Paralleling St. Mary’s Road through Lafayette and Moraga, the trail begins at Canyon Road about 0.7 miles south of Camino Pablo and terminates at Olympic Boulevard to the north in Lafayette.

3.3 Monitoring Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives Descriptions of the MTSOs and the target values for each were provided in Section 2. The values of the MTSOs established by the 2009 Action Plan for the

24 32

Lamorinda Routes of Regional Significance were monitored in 2013. Table 3 summarizes the results of the monitoring. All of these were met during the 2013 monitoring effort, except for the MTSO describing side street maximum waiting times on Pleasant Hill Road.

Table 3: Status of MTSOs of Routes of Regional Significance

Route MTSO 2013 Monitoring Report

Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or better AM: 1.5 during peak period/peak direction SR-24 PM: 1.4 (including freeway on-ramps). Caldecott Tunnel Maintain a Delay Index (DI) of 1.5 or to I-680 EB: 1.0 less for all but the six most congested WB: 1.0 hours of the day. Maintain a loading factor of 1.5 AM: 1.26 BART pax/seat or better during peak PM: 1.47 period/peak direction Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or better AM: 1.2 during peak period/peak direction. PM: 1.4 Pleasant Hill Road AM: 1, except for Quandt Rd Taylor Boulevard Maintain a maximum wait time for intersection (2 cycles) to drivers on side streets wishing to access PM: 1, except for intersections at SR-24 Pleasant Hill Road or Taylor Boulevard Mt Diablo Blvd, Quandt Rd, and of one signal cycle or fewer. Reliez Valley Rd (2 cycles for the 3 exceptions) Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or better AM: 1.2 Camino Pablo during peak period/peak direction. PM: 1.2 / San Pablo The maximum wait time for drivers on Dam Road side streets wishing to access San Pablo AM: 1 I-80 to SR-24 Dam Road or Camino Pablo should be PM: 1 no greater than one signal cycle. Note: MTSOs added in the 2014 Update were not monitored.

25 33

3.4 Transit Service Transit service in Lamorinda is provided by the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART), and County Connection. In general, transit ridership has been slowly recovering after a decline during the years following the economic downturn of 2000-2001 and the recession of 2008-2011. Both BART and County Connection experienced small ridership increases in 2012. 3.4.1 BART BART service to Lamorinda is provided at the Orinda and Lafayette BART stations. The stations can be accessed through on-site park-and-ride lots and through several County Connection bus routes. Ridership in 2012, shown as average annual weekday exits at the two local BART stations, is shown in Figure 6. The MTSO for BART is to maintain an hourly average loading factor (ratio of passengers to seats) of 1.5 or less approaching Lafayette Station westbound and Orinda Station eastbound during each and every hour of service. An hourly averaging loading factor of 1.5 indicates that the number of passengers served during the hour is fifty percent greater than the number of seats available during that hour. Monitoring in 2013 indicated that this MTSO was met, with the highest observed hourly average loading factor being 1.47 at 2:00 PM in the eastbound direction, and 1.26 at 7:00 AM in the westbound direction. Figure 6: Average Annual Weekday Exits at Orinda and Lafayette BART stations

Source: BART 2012 Ridership Report.

26 34

3.4.2 County Connection The Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCCTA), or County Connection, serves the Lamorinda area including both the Orinda and Lafayette BART stations. The bus routes currently serving this area are 1, 6, and 25, as illustrated in Figure 7. In addition to the regular bus routes, County Connection operates supplemental bus service on school days to accommodate heavy ridership. Such routes serving Lamorinda schools are 603, 606, 625, and 626. In 2009, the County Connection route system went through a major restructuring in which its routes were renumbered and/or changed and some weekend service eliminated, resulting in a decrease in ridership in subsequent years. Ridership on the Lamorinda area routes has fluctuated over the past decade, as shown in Figure 8. Figure 9 illustrates Lamorinda ridership in the 2012 fiscal year by route, and Figure 10 shows the 2012 FY ridership demographic profile by age group.

Figure 7: County Connection System Map (Lamorinda area)

Source: County Connection, July 2013.

27 35

Figure 8: Annual Ridership for County Connection Lamorinda Bus Routes

Source: County Connection, November 2013.

Figure 9: FY 2012 Ridership for County Connection Lamorinda Service, by Bus Route

Source: County Connection, November 2013.

28 36

Figure 10: FY 2012 Ridership for County Connection Lamorinda Service, by Age Group

Source: County Connection, January 2014.

3.4.3 Paratransit Paratransit services are provided by County Connection LINK and Lamorinda Spirit Van. The Lamorinda Spirit Van is an alliance between public and private organizations in Moraga, Orinda, and Lafayette. Ridership on these two services, shown in Figure 11, has been steadily rising, mirroring a trend found throughout the Bay Area. With population forecasts showing a large increase in the senior (age 62 and over) demographic, the rising demand for paratransit is a trend that is expected to continue. The Lamorinda jurisdictions have also teamed together to undertake a Lamorinda Circulator Study. The purpose of the study, which will be sponsored by CCTA and County Connection, will be to determine whether some type of shuttle service would be viable within the Lamorinda community and what would be involved in operating a shuttle to connect neighborhoods with BART, downtowns/Priority Development Areas (PDAs) and park-and-ride lots.

29 37

Figure 11: Annual Paratransit Ridership in Lamorinda 35,000

30,347 29,308 30,000 27,637 3,295 4,088 3,030 25,000

20,000

15,000 26,259 24,607 26,013 10,000 Annual Paratransit Ridership

5,000

0 2010 2011 2012 Lamorinda Spirit Van

County Connection LINK

Source: County Connection LINK, Lamorinda Spirit Van, 2014.

30 38

4 OVERALL GROWTH RATES AND FUTURE TRAVEL PATTERNS

Forecasts for future population and employment levels in Lamorinda were derived from the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) countywide travel model. Model forecasts are based on the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Current Regional Plan Projections produced in 2011 as part of the regional plan update and the 2013 CCTA Land Use Information System (LUIS ’13). Provided in the model are forecasts for the year 2010, 2020, 2030, and 2040. Current year 2013 estimates are derived through straight-line interpolation between 2010 and 2020.

31 39

4.1 Population Forecasts Population forecasts, including demographics, households, and employment are shown in Tables 4 and 5. By 2040, the total Lamorinda population is forecast to grow 11 percent from today. Seniors (age 62 and over) are to make up most of that growth, increasing by 54 percent. The forecasts were developed based upon ABAG’s Current Regional Plan Projections produced in 2011, and were subject to extensive review by the local jurisdictions. The forecasts reflect that by 2040, the percentage of people who are over the age of 62 and still in the work force will have dramatically increased. This trend applies not only for Lamorinda, but also for the remainder of Contra Costa. Table 4: Lamorinda Demographic Forecasts Lamorinda Lamorinda Net Growth 2013- Percent 2013 2040 2040 Growth Senior (Age 62+) 13,560 20,880 7320 54% Adult (Non-Senior) 35,880 35,420 -460 -1% Non-working Young 15,060 15,200 140 1% Total Population 64,500 71,500 7000 11% Source: CCTA Travel Demand Model, Projections 2013.

Table 5: Lamorinda Population, Households, Employed Residents and Employment Forecasts Lamorinda Lamorinda Net Growth Percent 2013 2040 2013-2040 Growth Total Population 64,500 71,500 7,000 11% Total Households 24,200 27,200 3,000 13% Total Employed Residents 28,700 33,000 4,400 15% Total Employees 19,000 21,900 2,900 15% Source: CCTA Travel Demand Model, Projections 2013. The total number of employees, or jobs, in Lamorinda is expected to grow at a slower rate than the number of employed residents. Since there are currently fewer employees than employed residents, the net out-commuting travel pattern that exists today will likely continue. Table 6 illustrates present and forecast work trip distribution within and outside of Lamorinda.

32 40

Table 6: Lamorinda Employed Residents Distribution Profile Work Location Lamorinda Other Bay Area 2013 2040 2013 2040 Lamorinda 3,200 3,400 25,500 29,600 Home Other Bay Location Area 15,800 18,500 Source: CCTA Travel Demand Model, Projections 2013. Total household growth among the three cities is roughly evenly distributed, as shown in Figure 12. Moraga is expected to have 1,300 new households, while the cities of Lafayette and Orinda are forecasted to absorb 1,050 new households each. Figure 12: Households by Area, 2013 to 2040

Source: CCTA Travel Demand Model, Projections 2013.

4.2 Employment Forecasts Total employment within Lamorinda is forecast to grow 15 percent by 2040 as shown in Table 7. Most of this growth is to occur in the service sector which will account for almost 50 percent of the total employment growth.

33 41

Table 7: Lamorinda Employment Forecast Lamorinda Lamorinda Net Growth Percent 2013 2040 2013-2040 Growth Retail 4,900 5,400 500 10% Service 8,800 10,300 1,500 17% Manufacturing 900 1,200 300 33% Agricultural 140 160 20 14% Wholesale 530 650 120 23% Other 3,700 4,200 500 13% Total Employment 18,970 21,910 2,940 16% Source: CCTA Travel Demand Model, Projections 2013. Distribution of employment growth is not expected to be even, with most of the growth occurring in Lafayette (about 1,430 jobs). Moraga and Orinda are forecasted to add about 830 and 680 jobs, respectively, as shown in Figure 13. Figure 13: Employment by Area, 2013 to 2040

Source: CCTA Travel Demand Model, Projections 2013.

4.3 Traffic Forecasts Travel forecasts were developed using the CCTA model system. The travel behavior represented by the CCTA model, which is consistent with the regional model used by MTC, is used to represent the growth in travel in each subregion. Forecasts are used to pivot off of existing travel patterns as reflected in traffic counts and transit ridership counts. These counts capture any unique travel characteristics of the travelers in any particular subregion. As shown in Table 8,

34 42

traffic demand is expected to grow significantly on Lamorinda area freeways and arterials. Table 8: Traffic Forecasts for Select Routes of Regional Significance and Interjurisdictional Routes 2013 - 2013 2013 - 2040 2040 AM AM Peak AM Peak AM Peak Road Name Peak Hour Direction Hour Hour Volume Volume Volume % Growth Growth Routes of Regional Significance SR-24 Westbound SR-24 west of I-680 interchange Westbound 9,800 1,490 15% (east of Pleasant Hill Road) SR-24 east of Oak Hill Road Westbound 9,800 1,700 18% SR-24 west of Acalanes Road Westbound 10,400 1,050 10% SR-24 west of Moraga Way Westbound 10,900 1,070 12% SR-24 at Caldecott Tunnel Westbound 10,400 1,630 16% Pleasant Hill Road at Reliez Valley Southbound 1,540 180 11% Road Camino Pablo at Miner Road Southbound 1,250 60 6% Interjurisdictional Routes Moraga Way north of Glorietta Northbound 850 80 9% Boulevard Moraga Road north of St Mary’s Northbound 860 120 14% Road (Lafayette) Mount Diablo Blvd west of Westbound 1,660 300 18% Moraga Road Source: CCTA Travel Demand Model, Projections 2011[age 52 .

4.4 Forecasts of MTSO Values for 2040 An assessment of travel forecasts for 2040 indicated that the programmed regional and local projects and the actions of this Action Plan would lead to achievement of all the Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives in the Lamorinda Area except for the side street delay on Pleasant Hill Road. A summary of the results of the analysis is presented in Table 9. The table provides the results from the 2013 MTSO monitoring, values estimated for a “No Project” forecast that excludes all actions contained in the five Action Plans, and values for a ‘With Actions” forecast that includes all actions from the five Action Plans. More detail on the MTSO values can be found in Appendix A. The growth in the volume of traffic though the corridor, particularly on SR-24, is kept low in the “With Actions” scenario by a significant increase in the BART service and

35 43

capacity assumed in the 2040 forecasts and by the Lamorinda Action Plan Gateway Constraint Policy.

36 44

Table 9: Assessment of MTSO Values for 2013 and 2040

Route MTSO 2013 Monitoring Report 2040 No Project 2040 With Actions

Maintain a Delay Index (DI) of 2.0 (2.5 AM: 1.0 (EB), 1.5 (WB) AM: 1.5 (EB), 2.4 (WB) AM: 1.4 (EB), 1.7 (WB) after 2030) or better during peak hour PM: 1.4 (EB), 1.3 (WB) PM: 2.0 (EB), 1.7 (WB) PM: 1.7 (EB), 1.7 (WB) SR-24 (including freeway on-ramps) Caldecott Tunnel to I-680 Maintain a Delay Index (DI) of 1.5 or Delay Index is below 1.5 for all but Delay Index is below 1.5 for all but Delay Index is below 1.5 for all but better for all but the six most the six most congested hours of the the six most congested hours of the the six most congested hours of the congested hours of the day day. day. day. Maintain a loading factor of 1.5 The MTSO is not exceeded in any The MTSO is not exceeded in any The MTSO is not exceeded in any BART pax/seat or better during each hour of hour of service. hour of service. hour of service. service Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or better AM: N/A (NB), 1.2 (SB) AM: 1.5 (NB), 1.4 (SB) AM: 1.3 (NB), 1.3 (SB) during peak hour PM: 1.4 (NB), N/A (SB) PM: 1.8 (NB), 2.1 (SB) PM: 1.6 (NB), 1.9 (SB) Pleasant Hill Road AM: 1 cycle, except for Spring Hill AM: 1 cycle, except for Spring Hill AM: 1 cycle, except for Spring Hill Taylor Boulevard to Maximum wait time for drivers on side Rd intersection (2 cycles) Rd intersection (2 cycles) Rd intersection (2 cycles) SR-24 streets wishing to access Pleasant Hill PM: 1 cycle, except for intersections PM: 1 cycle, except for PM: 1 cycle, except for intersections Road or Taylor Boulevard of one signal at Green Valley Dr, and Spring Hill intersections at Green Valley Dr, at Green Valley Dr, and Spring Hill cycle or less Rd (2 cycles) and Spring Hill Rd (2 cycles) Rd (2 cycles) Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or better AM: N/A (NB), 1.2 (SB) AM: 1.4 (NB), 1.6 (SB) AM: 1.3 (NB), 1.5 (SB) Camino Pablo / San during peak hour PM: 1.2 (NB), N/A (SB) PM: 1.4 (NB), 1.1 (SB) PM: 1.3 (NB), 1.0 (SB) Pablo Dam Road Maximum wait time for drivers on side AM: All intersections have 1 cycle AM: 1 cycle, except for Wildcat AM: All intersections have 1 cycle Wildcat Canyon Rd streets wishing to access San Pablo wait for side streets. Canyon Rd intersection (2 cycles) wait for side streets. to SR-24 Dam Road/Camino Pablo of one signal PM: All intersections have 1 cycle PM: All intersections have 1 cycle PM: All intersections have 1 cycle cycle or less wait for side streets. wait for side streets. wait for side streets. Note: MTSOs added in 2014 update were not monitored for 2013 Bold – MTSO value is below standard

Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

37 45

5 ACTIONS FOR ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

To address future traffic, congestion and mobility issues, the LPMC has identified a set of actions that are intended to result in achievement of the Action Plan vision, policies, and goals identified in Section 2.1. The actions represent a combination of specific projects, programs, measures, and mitigations that the Lamorinda jurisdictions have agreed to carry out as part of the Action Plan implementation. Although the actions are designed to achieve the fourteen statements of vision, policies, and goals of the LPMC, there is not a one-to-one correspondence between the actions and the statements. Most of the actions apply to a broad set of the fourteen statements and each of the statements would be addressed through a broad set of the actions. Supplemental material can be found in Appendix B in the form of a matrix for each of the Secondary Routes of Regional Significance (Pleasant Hill Road between Taylor Boulevard and SR-24 and Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road)

38 46

and each of the new Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes. Unless noted otherwise, these roadway segments are intended to retain their characteristics. Used to formulate Action Plan elements for each of the routes, each matrix divides the route in question into logical segments and provides an assessment for each of the following parameters:  Segment Characteristics  Roadway (or Trail) Characteristics  Needs  Possible Performance Measures  Possible Actions

5.1 Actions Table 10 lists the actions that the Lamorinda jurisdictions have agreed to carry out with support from CCTA, Caltrans, BART, County Connection, East Bay Regional Parks, and a variety of other transportation providers to implement the Lamorinda Action Plan. The table is divided into five sections:  Transit  Travel Demand Management  Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities and Safety  Roadway and Traffic Management  Regional Coordination and Action Plan Implementation For each action, Table 10 indicates the routes to which the action is to apply. While some of the actions are oriented to a single route, most apply to more than one. Table 10 also indicates the jurisdiction or other agency with the primary responsibility for implementation of each action. Each action was also evaluated for implementation potential and potential benefit. Those identified as “High” in both categories are indicated with bold and italics lettering in Table 10. Those identified as “High” in potential benefit only are shown with italics but not bold. The actions in this Lamorinda Action Plan reflect an orientation toward maintaining a safe travel environment, a reasonable level of service for travel within the area and a high quality of life for Lamorinda residents consistent with the stated vision, goals, and policies identified in Section 2.1 of this document. The actions are designed to achieve the MTSOs identified in Section 2.2 through demand management, traffic system management and the support of transit and other alternative modes of transportation. The actions are designed to provide safe opportunities for walking and bicycling particularly for school trips and for access to BART and bus services. There is also no direct one-to-one

39 47

correspondence between the actions and the MTSOs. The MTSOs define the overall standard of performance that is desired for the Routes of Regional Significance and the Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes, and the composite set of actions is designed to ensure that the standards are met for the routes.

40 48

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Pleasant Mount Lafayette- Transit Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Hill Diablo Moraga Pablo Dam Way Road Responsibility Road Boulevard Trail Road Support augmentation and expansion of, and seek funding for, Lamorinda subscription bus service (flex van) to Jurisdictions, 1.01 BART stations and high volume        CCCTA, and ridership locations such as St. BART Mary’s College, to provide additional transit opportunities. Support expansion of BART seat Lamorinda capacity through the corridor, 1.02 Jurisdictions parking capacity east of Lamorinda,        and BART and headway reduction. Develop a Lamorinda Transit Plan Lamorinda to identify future community transit 1.03 Jurisdictions needs and to address the changing        and CCCTA needs of the senior population. Support bus headway reductions on routes providing service to the Bay Lamorinda Point/Colma BART line and Jurisdictions, 1.04 reinstatement of direct service to        CCCTA, and important employment centers such as BART Pleasanton and Bishop Ranch. Support and seek additional funding for expanding transit service, including service between Lamorinda Lamorinda BART stations and adjacent Jurisdictions, 1.05 communities in Central County,        CCCTA, and service on Pleasant Hill Road north of BART Sr-24, service to Bishop Ranch and the Tri-Valley area, and service through the Caldecott Tunnel.

41 49

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Mount Lafayette Transit Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo - Moraga Hill Road Pablo Way Road Responsibility Boulevard Trail Dam Road Support BART and CCCTA strategies that enhance transit ridership and Lamorinda 1.06 reduce single-occupant vehicle trips        Jurisdictions, and encourage casual carpools for CCCTA, and BART one-way BART ridership. Support and seek funding for Lamorinda 1.07 augmentation and expansion of        Jurisdictions, school bus service in Lamorinda. CCCTA Seek funds to build and operate park and ride lots and associated Lamorinda BART shuttles in Lamorinda to 1.08 Jurisdictions, encourage carpooling and transit        CCCTA and BART ridership while reducing single occupant vehicle commute loads. Support transit service that links Lamorinda bus service more Lamorinda 1.09 directly to communities to the north     Jurisdictions and east of Lafayette and Orinda. Support the provision of public transit service in the Pleasant Hill Lafayette and 1.10 Road / Taylor Boulevard Corridor    CCCTA with connections to BART and other CCCTA services in Lafayette. Maintain Lamorinda school bus 1.11 program service to Wagner Ranch  Orinda School.

42 50

43 51

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Pleasant Mount Lafayette- Travel Demand Management Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Hill Diablo Moraga Pablo Dam Way Road Responsibility Road Boulevard Trail Road Support a collaborative effort with the Acalanes Union High School District to reduce auto trips and to Lamorinda 2.01 promote and increase ridesharing        Jurisdictions and use of transit for travel to and from the high schools in Lamorinda. Explore actions to improve SR-24 flow Lamorinda 2.02 in PM and use of BART consistent with        Jurisdictions, the Gateway Constraint Policy. CCCTA and BART Support school start times on Pleasant 2.03 Hill Road that reduce peak commute        Lafayette loads on the roadway. Encourage expanded Travel Demand Management (TDM) programs to increase the use of alternative modes of transportation and increase overall vehicle occupancy. Promote TDM Lamorinda 2.04 activities including ridesharing,        Jurisdictions casual carpooling and BART pool using resources such as the SWAT TDM program and RIDES for Bay Area Commuters. Encourage “green” commuting Lamorinda 2.05 including ZEV and NEV vehicles, clean        Jurisdictions fuel infrastructure and car sharing.

44 52

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Mount Lafayette Travel Demand Management Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo - Moraga Hill Road Pablo Dam Way Road Responsibility Boulevard Trail Road Support Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs at St. Mary’s College and the high schools, middle schools and elementary schools that encourage Lamorinda 2.06 students to take alternative modes      Jurisdictions of transportation to school to reduce demand on the roadway and increase vehicle occupancy rates. Seek funding to utilize existing Lamorinda 2.07 parking for park-and-ride for        Jurisdictions Lamorinda residents. Study need for, feasibility, and cost of installing additional park and ride lots and/or HOV bypass lanes Lamorinda 2.08 at critical congestion points in the    Jurisdictions corridors leading into Lamorinda Routes of Regional Significance from other subareas. Promote alternative work opportunities including employer Lamorinda 2.09 pre-tax benefit programs,        Jurisdictions compressed work-week schedules, flex schedules and telework. In cooperation with Lamorinda jurisdictions, develop TDM plans and provide consultations to Lamorinda 2.10 improve mobility and decreased        Jurisdictions parking demand for new development and redevelopment while not reducing parking supply.

45 53

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities and Safety Mount Lafayette Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo - Moraga Hill Road Pablo Way Road Responsibility Boulevard Trail Dam Road Evaluate and seek opportunities to improve and/or build pedestrian and bicycle facilities between the Lafayette and 3.01 Lamorinda BART stations and         Orinda adjacent land uses and communities. Support pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements around Lamorinda 3.02 schools, trailheads, and at         Jurisdictions intersections and along the bikeway network. Improve and/or add sidewalks Lamorinda 3.03 and/or pedestrian pathways.         Jurisdictions Support pedestrian and bicycle improvements including BART access, to encourage alternative Lamorinda 3.04 transportation modes, increase         Jurisdictions transit ridership, and reduce auto demand. Design pedestrian and bicycle facilities to connect with the planned EBMUD 3.05 Lafayette pathway identified in Lafayette’s         Bikeways Master Plan. Support the development of regional Lamorinda 3.06 bicycle facilities.         Jurisdictions Seek funding to provide bicycle parking infrastructure at employment Lamorinda 3.07 sites and activity centers throughout       Jurisdictions Lamorinda. Install, where appropriate, bicycle Lamorinda 3.08 lanes as part of any future roadway      Jurisdictions improvements to the corridor.

46 54

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities and Camino Primary Mount Lafayette Safety Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo - Moraga Hill Road Pablo Way Road Responsibility Boulevard Trail Dam Road Improve pedestrian Lamorinda 3.09 connectivity to multi-use     Jurisdictions trails. Explore the feasibility of widening existing pedestrian/bike facilities where appropriate to accommodate demand and Lamorinda where technically and Jurisdictions 3.10 financially feasible. Improve       and Contra north-south bicycling by Costa County providing a continuous bikeway facility to address the gap created by the Pleasant Hill Rd/Taylor Blvd split. Improve Lafayette-Moraga Lafayette and 3.11 Regional Trail street  Moraga crossings and striping. Encourage commute use of the Lafayette-Moraga Lafayette and 3.12 Regional Trail and other  Moraga trails systems as they are developed. Provide a bicycle and pedestrian trail from Wilder Road to Moraga Way to 3.13 Orinda provide a safer path of travel    for bicyclist currently riding on the SR-24 shoulder.

47 55

Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities and Camino Primary Mount Lafayette Safety Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo - Moraga Hill Road Pablo Way Road Responsibility Boulevard Trail Dam Road Work with East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD) and East Bay Regional Parks District (EPRPD) to reopen the Moraga 3.14 Lafayette-Moraga Regional    EBMUD Trail near August Drive EBRPD between School Street Bridge and Canyon Road Bridge to restore the pedestrian and bicycle link.

48 56

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Pleasant Mount Lafayette- Roadway and Traffic Management SR- Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation BART Hill Diablo Moraga 24 Pablo Way Road Responsibility Road Boulevard Trail Dam Road Investigate appropriate mechanisms, including maintaining existing roadway Lafayette, Orinda lanes and widths and restrictive 4.01 and Contra Costa signal timing and metering, to    County discourage use of arterial roads as a substitute for freeway travel. Explore opportunities to conduct studies to identify options for connecting regional traffic to SR-24 without negatively affecting Lafayette and Orinda downtowns or residential neighborhoods, including Lamorinda 4.02 options for bypass corridors.       Jurisdictions Seek funding to implement options selected by local jurisdictions, such as inclusion of projects in the expenditure plan(s) of future regional funding plans and measures. Seek and secure funding for implementation of the future Lafayette Downtown Congestion 4.03 Study for getting Lamorinda        Lafayette trips to and from SR-24 as a project of significant regional benefit.

49 57

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Mount Lafayette- Roadway and Traffic Management Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo Moraga  Hill Road Pablo Way Road Responsibility  Boulevard Trail Dam Road Support added person trip Lafayette and capacity on regional freeways that 4.04 Contra Costa could divert traffic from Pleasant    County Hill Road. Explore opportunities to work with TRANSPAC to develop a traffic management program to Lafayette and discourage use of 4.05 Contra Costa westbound/southbound traffic    County using Pleasant Hill Road north of SR-24 to bypass the I-680 SR-24 interchange. Seek funding for an auxiliary lane on eastbound SR-24 Gateway on- ramp to Brookwood and continue Lamorinda 4.06 completion of improvements to    Jurisdictions eastbound Brookwood off-ramp subject to specific design criteria. Support efforts of Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol to Lamorinda 4.07 implement an incident     Jurisdictions management program on SR-24. Support HOV and transit improvements in the I-680 and I- Lamorinda 4.08 80 corridors to reduce single     Jurisdictions occupant automobile use on SR-24. Support WCCTAC’s efforts to reduce diversion from I-80 to alternative routes in Lamorinda Lamorinda 4.09 through operational     Jurisdictions improvements that increase throughput on I-80.

50 58

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Mount Lafayette- Roadway and Traffic Management Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo Moraga Hill Road Pablo Way Road Responsibility Boulevard Trail Dam Road Explore ways to redesign roadway (Mount Diablo 4.10 Boulevard) to discourage      Lafayette diversion from SR-24 but without reducing capacity. Support multi-modal safety actions that encourage safe Lamorinda 4.11 speeds with particular emphasis      Jurisdictions on access to schools. Seek to monitor and evaluate Lamorinda 4.12 traffic speed and other safety      Jurisdictions issues on an annual basis. Seek to reduce the speed limit on Lafayette and southbound Taylor Blvd at 4.13 Contra Costa approach to Pleasant Hill Road to      County improve safety at the merge. Pursue opportunities to install Lafayette, Orinda permanent, speed feedback signs 4.14 and Contra Costa to slow vehicle speeds and reduce      County the severity of collisions. Seek funding to provide increased Lamorinda 4.15 enforcement of the existing speed      Jurisdictions limits. Protect adjacent residential Lafayette and streets from diverted cut-through 4.16 Contra Costa traffic through the installation of      County traffic calming measures.

51 59

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Mount Lafayette- Roadway and Traffic Management Pleasant Pablo/San Moraga Moraga Implementation SR-24 BART Diablo Moraga Hill Road Pablo Way Road Responsibility Boulevard Trail Dam Road Seek Measure J funding of HOV Orinda and 4.17 facility needs for San Pablo Dam  Contra Costa Road and Camino Pablo. County Lamorinda Minimize number of new street Jurisdictions and 4.18 and driveway access points to the    Contra Costa extent that is feasible. County Seek to coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda Lamorinda 4.19 agencies for detecting, reporting,      Jurisdictions announcing and documenting lane or road closures. Explore opportunities to coordinate Lamorinda Lamorinda 4.20 procedures/practices for traffic      Jurisdictions management during lane or road closure. Replace or reconstruct piping, drainage or undergrounding of Lamorinda 4.21 utility infrastructure to reduce      Jurisdictions incidence of lane or road closure Maintain vegetation and drainage Lamorinda 4.22 to reduce incidence of lane or      Jurisdictions road closure. Evaluate opportunities for Lamorinda 4.23 adaptive signal timing.      Jurisdictions Review and consider options for 4.24 improving truck loading      Lafayette regulations and actions. Add a right-turn lane to the Orinda and 4.25 eastbound SR-24 off-ramp for      Caltrans southbound Mroaga Was

52 60

Table 10: 2014 Lamorinda Action Plan – Proposed Actions (continued) Route of Regional Significance Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Route Camino Primary Regional Coordination and Action Plan Pleasant Pablo/Sa Mount Lafayette- Moraga Moraga Implementation Implementation SR-24 BART Hill n Pablo Diablo Moraga Way Road Responsibility Road Dam Boulevard Trail Road Participate in the Lamorinda Lamorinda 5.01 Transportation Impact Fee (LTIF).         Jurisdictions Support continuation and expansion Lamorinda 5.02 of Measures J return-to-source funds       Jurisdictions for road maintenance. Seek to establish reciprocity agreements with jurisdictions outside of Lamorinda to mitigate the downstream impacts of Lamorinda 5.03 proposed new development projects or     Jurisdictions General Plan Amendments that could adversely affect ability to achieve the MTSOs. Monitor and evaluate the MTSOs for all 5.04 Routes of Regional Significance every     CCTA four years. If the CCCTA cannot increase service to Acalanes High and Campolindo Schools, Lamorinda 5.05 evaluate the feasibility of augmenting   Jurisdictions the existing school bus program to add the high school as funding permits. Local jurisdictions to work with the transit agencies to resolve transit stop 5.06 access and amenity needs on San Pablo  Orinda Dam Road and Camino Pablo as identified by the transit agencies.

53 61

54 62

5.2 Preliminary Analysis Results of Actions While actions identified in Table 10 are intended to work toward achievement of the MTSOs by 2040, the modeling results show that this may not be the case. In fact, model runs indicate that some of the MTSOs will be exceeded by 2040, even with full implementation of the Action Plan. However, it should be recognized that, while implementing the actions may not achieve the MTSOs, there are benefits to doing so. The actions would still serve to manage the underlying issues targeted in the MTSOs, thus minimizing the adverse effects felt by the users of the facilities in question. In that regard, it is important to note that the CCTA’s GMP does not measure a local jurisdiction’s compliance with the GMP on whether or not all of the MTSOs have been achieved. GMP compliance is determined by asking, through the biennial GMP Checklist, whether each jurisdiction has carried out or is actively pursuing implementation of the actions assigned to it in the adopted Action Plan within the time frame of the Action Plan. Compliance with the GMP could become an issue, however, when a local jurisdiction fails to carry out or actively pursue implementation of the actions for which it is responsible. Every few years, CCTA will monitor the Routes of Regional Significance to assess whether the MTSOs are being met. If that monitoring effort shows that an MTSO exceedance has occurred, then the LPMC may wish to re-visit its adopted Action Plan, and determine whether revisions are necessary. Such revisions could include, for example, adding new actions, or changing the MTSOs. CCTA’s Growth Management Implementation Documents state that the RTPCs “should avoid watering down MTSOs during the revision process,” however, changes to the MTSOs are still an option for the LPMC. A preferred outcome would be to reach consensus for the Lamorinda jurisdictions to increase their local commitments to actions needed to achieve the MTSOs.7 To help address the issue of through traffic on Lamorinda’s Regional Routes, the following two policies have been adopted for inclusion in the Lamorinda Action Plan: Gateway Constraints, and Traffic Management. The combination of these policies has the potential to limit through traffic during any given hour to a level that could potentially be accommodated within the limits of the MTSOs.

5.3 Gateway Constraint Policy A key policy of this Action Plan for Lamorinda is to carry forward the adopted “gateway constraint” policy that controls the physical width of regional routes that serve Lamorinda. As stated in Section 2.1, the policy reads as follows:

7 Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Growth Management Program Implementation Guide, June 16, 2010, p. 36.

55 63

“Maintain capacity constraints at selected gateways with the intent of preserving and improving mobility on Routes of Regional Significance within Lamorinda.” The policy sets maximum number of through lanes and lane widths for SR-24 inbound gateways and similarly, identifies limits on the number of lanes for arterials such as Pleasant Hill Road and Camino Pablo. The Gateway Constraint policy is beneficial to Lamorinda residents, because it reserves some room on the regional system for traffic that has an origin and/or destination in Lamorinda. Furthermore, the modeling analysis indicates that a Gateway Constraint policy may be the key to achieving the MTSOs for Lamorinda. The south county jurisdictions of SWAT (Danville, San Ramon, and Contra Costa County) also have a Gateway Constraint policy that has been in place since 1995, when the first Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan was adopted. The policy has been successfully implemented through the TVTC, whose Contra Costa jurisdictions fall under the purview of SWAT as the designated RTPC under Measure C/J.

5.4 Gateway Policies for Specific Routes The location of Lamorinda gateways are identified in Figure 14. Each of the gateways is addressed below. Figure 14: Locations of Lamorinda Gateways

56 64

SR-24: The four-lane Caldecott section of SR-24 in the eastbound direction, and the four-lane cross section of SR-24 in the westbound direction, just west of the Pleasant Hill Road off-ramp, represent gateway constraints. In the eastbound direction, SR-24 gateway capacity is currently limited by the Caldecott Tunnel. At the time the baseline MTSO monitoring data was collected in 2013, the Caldecott Tunnel had three tunnels, each with two lanes. The center tunnel was reversible and was operated in the peak direction: westbound in the morning and eastbound in the evening. This method of operation provided four lanes of capacity in the peak direction. Because of the combination of factors at the entrances to the tunnel, the practical capacity in the peak direction was limited to about 8,000 to 8,400 vehicles per hour. Although a two-lane, fourth bore for the Caldecott Tunnel was opened in late 2013, only the capacity of the off-peak direction was increased for which only one tunnel (two lanes) was previously available. The capacity constraint for westbound traffic at the east end of SR-24 results from northbound and southbound congestion on I-680 during the morning peak producing stop-and-go conditions before the exit ramps to SR-24. A second constraint exists westbound on SR-24 at the Pleasant Hill Road exit where an auxiliary lane ends. Six lanes of westbound traffic enter SR-24 from the east end: three from southbound I-680, two from northbound I-680 and one from Mt. Diablo Boulevard in Walnut Creek. These six lanes merge to five lanes for a short segment, but only four lanes continue past the Pleasant Hill Road exit. The effective westbound capacity constraint at that point is about 8,400 to 8,800 vehicles per hour. Pleasant Hill Road: The two southbound through lanes on Pleasant Hill Road– Taylor Boulevard are proposed as a gateway constraint. The Gateway Constraint Policy would prohibit the addition of any through lanes, including short-link segments, on any portion of Pleasant Hill Road between SR-24 and the Lafayette city limits line north of the intersection with Taylor Boulevard. The other details of the gateway constraint are to be defined in a traffic management plan developed jointly with TRANSPAC (see Action 4.04 in Table 7). Pleasant Hill Road is two through lanes in each direction from its merge with Taylor Boulevard south to SR-24 with additional turn lanes at most intersections. The first signalized intersection south of the Pleasant Hill Road-Taylor Boulevard merge is at the “T” intersection with Rancho View Drive. Other major intersections are at Green Valley Road, Reliez Valley Road, Spring Hill Road and Stanley Road/Deer Hill Road. Each of these signalized intersections has left- and right-turn lanes on Pleasant Hill Road. The capacity constraints on arterials providing access to the Lamorinda area are determined by the number of lanes and the timing of signals at intersections near the entry point. On Pleasant Hill Road southbound during the AM peak period, capacity is determined primarily by the timing of signals at the four major intersections and how much green time is given to Pleasant Hill Road and how

57 65

much is given to the cross streets. While the gateway policy includes physical characteristics at key intersections, gateway constraints may also be affected by varying the timing of signals, both along the corridor and at strategic entry points into the system. This action is further discussed below in the Traffic Management strategy section. Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road: Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road is one lane in each direction with left turn lanes at most major intersections from the Orinda border south to Miner Road. It is two lanes in each direction with left and right turn lanes from Miner Road to SR-24. The southbound gateway capacity for the road is set primarily by the signals along the two-lane section of the road at Wildcat Canyon/Bear Creek Road, Miner Road and El Toyonal/Orinda Way.

5.5 Traffic Management Strategies While a Gateway Constraint policy could limit the volume of traffic entering Lamorinda during peak hours, it would not fully address the operational issues of how to manage the flow of traffic through the gateways. For that reason, Traffic Management Strategies are also proposed to further address the issue of peak hour traffic entering Lamorinda during the peak period. Traffic Management Strategies include single point metering (metering traffic through a signalized intersection) and signal timing coordination. For example, to encourage through commuters to use I-680 rather than Pleasant Hill Road, one possible traffic management strategy would be to meter the through-traffic flow on southbound Pleasant Hill Road in the AM peak period, while maintaining accessibility for Lamorinda residents who wish to enter Pleasant Hill Road via cross-streets within Lamorinda. A similar strategy could be appropriate for Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road. 8 The AM peak period traffic volume southbound on Pleasant Hill Road south of Reliez Valley Road was 2,690 vehicles based on a count taken in 1990 just before the improved I-680/SR-24 interchange was opened. By 2000, the volume had dropped to 1,974 because more traffic was using I-680 and SR-24. However, increasing congestion at the interchange in the past few years has resulted in an increase in the volume on Pleasant Hill Road indicating more diversion. Before implementing a traffic management strategy to restrict the flow of entering vehicles on either of these two arterials, turning-movement traffic

8 The traffic management strategy of single point metering and signal timing coordination is not without precedent. In the East County and Central County subareas, the Railroad Avenue/Kirker Pass Road/Ygnacio Valley Road corridor functions as a major travel route for commuters coming from East to Central County in the westbound AM peak period. The Central County Action Plan proposed that a Traffic Management Program (TMP) should be jointly prepared by the TRANSPAC and TRANSPLAN RTPCs to address this heavy commute traffic. In 2001, the TMP was developed and subsequently implemented throughout the corridor, with single point metering at agreed-upon locations in Pittsburg, Concord and Walnut Creek. The TMP serves to meter through traffic along the corridor, while allowing cross-street traffic full access.

58 66

counts should be conducted at the intersections along the corridor that might be considered as the constraining point to determine intersection level of service and the amount of traffic that might be diverted by the constraint. In addition turning-movement counts and travel-time runs should be conducted in the corridor after implementation to determine whether the traffic management strategy is having the desired effect and without unnecessarily large negative impacts in terms of queues at the metering signals. Local success of gateway constraint and traffic management strategies to maintain downstream roadway capacity for Lamorinda is dependent on maintaining local control of decisions and signal operations. Gateway constraints and traffic management strategies considered for specific routes within Lamorinda shall be determined only by a policy decision made by the locally elected board having control over the gateway in question, after having undertaken a thorough public review process.

59 67

6 FINANCIAL PLAN

6.1 Overview of the Financial Plan The projects and programs affecting Lamorinda receive funding from a variety of sources. Many of the projects and programs designed to address needs within an individual community are funded by the general revenues of the jurisdiction (City or County) in which the project is being implemented or through development impact fees specific to the jurisdiction. Larger projects of a more regional nature generally receive funding from a variety of funding sources designed to address subarea or regional issues. These include revenue from the county sales tax measures for Contra Costa County (Measure J). Measure C in Contra Costa County was passed in 1988 and provided a half-cent sales tax for transportation through March 31, 2009. Measure J was passed in 2004 and extends the half-cent sales tax through 2034. Measure J provides roughly $2 billion over the 25-year period. Some of the key Lamorinda projects that will be funded by Measure J are the following:  BART East County Rail Extension

60 68

 I-680 HOV Lane Gap Closure and Transit Corridor Improvements  BART Parking, Access and Other Improvements  Local Street Maintenance and Improvements  Major Street Traffic Flow, Safety and Capacity Improvements  Transportation for Livable Communities Grants  Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities  Bus Services  Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities  Commute Alternatives  Congestion Management, Transportation Planning Facilities and Services  Safe Transportation for Children Many of the actions being added to the Action Plan in this update are oriented to management of traffic and are designed to increase the safety and mobility of travelers by all modes and are not necessarily oriented to increasing the capacity of the routes. While some, like automated speed advisory signs, may represent capital expenditures, others like increased speed-limit enforcement or improved maintenance of trees and other vegetation to prevent unplanned lane closures, are operational in nature. The collection of actions for the Secondary Routes of Regional Significance and the Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes could be grouped into interjurisdictional packages or programs for funding from the current Measure J or its potential future extension. Including them in an expenditure plan for a Measure J extension would ensure that the countywide sales tax benefits Lamorinda. Additional regional funds are provided by the following federal, state and regional sources:  Federal Surface Transportation Funds – MAP-21  State Transportation Development Act (TDA)/State Transit Assistance (STA) Revenues  State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funds  State Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation  STDA, Article 3 – Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds  Bridge Toll Revenues  Regional Measure 2 Bridge Toll Revenues for Specific Projects and Programs  AB 1107 half-cent sales tax revenues for transit (BART and AC Transit)

61 69

 Transportation Fund for Clean Air - Vehicle Registration Fees for Clean Air Programs  One Bay Area Grant Program Because so many of the actions in this Action Plan Update are oriented to implementation of the Complete Streets policies of the local jurisdictions, packages of actions for the Lamorinda area would be eligible for many of the federal, state and regional funds designed to improve transit, pedestrian and bicycle safety and mobility and to develop safe routes to schools. Many of the funds have been combined in the Bay Area into the One Bay Area Grant program for distribution on a competitive basis by MTC/ABAG and by the Congestion Management Agencies in each county, which for Contra Costa is CCTA. The traffic growth that is expected on the Routes of Regional Significance and the Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes will be mitigated in part through a set of projects and programs as identified in this Plan. Funding for these projects and programs through existing sources, however, will not be sufficient to fully fund all of the identified needs. Since the first plan was adopted in 1995, the LPMC has looked to new development to defray the costs of mitigating the impacts it creates. The LPMC’s Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program generates additional revenue to mitigate the impacts of new development in Lamorinda. Developer funding of projects to mitigate the impacts of new development that occurs outside of Lamorinda is subject to the establishment of reciprocity agreements between the LPMC and the upstream jurisdiction where that new development occurs. The Central County RTPC (TRANSPAC) considers use of such reciprocity agreements for projects that generate in excess of 100 net peak- hour vehicle trips.

6.2 Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program (STMP) In August 1994, the Lamorinda Program Management Committee (LPMC) adopted the Lamorinda Transportation Improvement Program (LTIP) as its blueprint for transportation planning through the year 2010. According to the statutory requirements of Measure C, the LPMC must adopt a subregional traffic mitigation program to ensure that new growth is paying its share of the costs associated with that growth. The CCTA established April 15, 1998 as the deadline by which all Contra Costa County jurisdictions must adopt a fee in order to remain in compliance with the Growth Management Program and continue receiving return to source funds from CCTA. The LTIP is the result of the Lamorinda Traffic Study completed in late 1994. It identified roughly 37 improvements to regional roadways and transit facilities and total approximately $17.7 million (in 1998 dollars). The LPMC then created the Lamorinda Transportation Impact Fee (LTIF) as a mechanism to charge new development to mitigate the traffic impacts it creates. The LTIF identified seven

62 70

projects for use of the funds. A fee structure for new development was established based on the expected impact of the new development and the cost to mitigate the impact. Since its adoption, the funds of the LTIF have been used for some of the projects identified. This update to the Lamorinda Action Plan made adjustments to the estimated costs for the remaining projects to reflect rising construction costs. Adopted recommendations from the upcoming Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study, including the exploration of the downtown bypass corridor, should be incorporated as future projects and actions to be funded. No new projects have been added nor has a re-evaluation of the needs for new and past projects occurred, but a reassessment of the project list and fee structure will be considered in 2015.

63 71

7 PROCEDURES FOR NOTIFICATION, REVIEW, AND MONITORING

This chapter provides guidance on implementation of the Action Plan, including the procedures for circulation of environmental documents and review of General Plan Amendments (GPAs). The chapter also includes the process for monitoring and review of the Action Plan.

7.1 Notification Regarding Development Applications and Environmental Documents As part of the Growth Management Program, local cities and towns are required to notify neighboring jurisdictions regarding proposed projects and GPAs. By

64 72

agreement among the three cities within Lamorinda, the following notification procedures shall be followed:  For any GPA, the lead jurisdictions shall notify the Lamorinda jurisdictions staff and the designated staff person for LPMC as soon as the GPA application is deemed complete.  For any proposed project that generates more than 10 and less than 50 net new peak hour vehicle trips in either the AM or PM peak hour, the lead jurisdictions shall notify the planning directors of the other Lamorinda jurisdictions as soon as the development application is deemed complete. No additional actions are required, unless the proposed development is subject to CEQA, in which case the CEQA-related notification procedures apply as outlined below.  For proposed projects that would generate 50 or more net new peak hour vehicle trips, the Lamorinda jurisdictions agree to the following procedure: 1. The Lead Agency shall notify the planning directors of the other Lamorinda jurisdictions and the designated staff liaisons for LPMC; 2. Following receipt of notification, any Lamorinda jurisdiction may request, and the sponsoring jurisdiction shall agree to, an informational meeting to discuss the application.  If the project generates more than 100 net peak hour vehicle trips, the Lead Agency shall in turn notify the designated staff person for SWAT, the staff of other jurisdictions within SWAT, and adjacent RTPCs as appropriate so that affected jurisdictions may comment on proposed projects and subsequent environmental documentation9. When the above-mentioned development projects and GPAs involve the CEQA process, notification shall occur at the following two junctures: 1. Upon issuance of a Notice of Intent to Issue a Negative Declaration or a Notice of Preparation for EIR/EIS; and 2. Upon completion of a Negative Declaration or draft EIR/EIS (Notice of Completion). In each case, the neighboring communities are to be provided an opportunity to review and comment on the environmental documents. Copies of the environmental documents are to be made available in hard-copy or electronic form. The Lamorinda subarea has made the policy more stringent than the established CCTA notification policy by setting the threshold for circulation below 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips. The threshold for net new peak hour

9 Conversely, as required under Authority Resolution 93-02-G, the other RTPCs will notify SWAT of proposed projects and general plan amendments that exceed 100 peak hour vehicle trips.

65 73

vehicle trips is the threshold total number of vehicle trips projected to enter and leave the project site, during the AM or the PM peak hour (whichever is greater), not including bypass vehicle trips, and exempting vehicle trips that are currently generated by the site if it is under an existing use. Table 11 contains examples of the types of developments that generate 50 or more new peak hour vehicle trips.10

Table 11: Examples of Developments Meeting the 50 Net Peak Hour Trip Threshold Land Use Size1,2 AM trips PM trips Single Family 42 DU 42 50 Condominium (Low Rise) 64 DU 43 50 Apartments 86 DU 40 50 Hotel 82 DU 48 50 Fast Food Restaurant 1.0 KSF 33 54 Shopping Center 3 KSF 18 57 General Office 19 KSF 51 28 1 DU = Dwelling Units 2 KSF = 1,000 Square Feet Source: ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012.

The process is intended to reflect the spirit of the cooperative multi-jurisdictional planning process as outlined in Measure J (2004). Furthermore, it is the intent of the Lamorinda jurisdictions to diligently notify one another regarding proposed projects and general plan amendments, irrespective of whether such notification is legally required under CEQA. Figure 15 illustrates the notification procedure outlined above, as well as the procedure for review of General Plan Amendments, as discussed in the following section.

10 These trip generation rates are only a guide and may need to be adjusted to fit the specific type of project proposed.

66 74

Figure 15: Action Plan Review Process for Lamorinda GPAs and Projects

67 75

7.2 Review of General Plan Amendments Existing General Plans were used as the basis for the modeled land use assumptions developed for the Action Plan. General Plan amendments (GPAs) other than those assumed in the land use assumptions could reduce the effectiveness of the Action Plan. A process has been defined to address GPAs and their impact on the Action Plan as illustrated in Figure 15. The tools and procedures for conducting and analyzing GPAs shall be in accordance with the Measure C/J Technical Procedures and Implementation Documents. The jurisdiction considering the GPA should submit the GPA to the LPMC (and to other RTPCs if the amendment would generate more than 500 net new peak hour vehicle trips) for evaluation of its impact on the ability to achieve Action Plan objectives. LPMC would then evaluate proposed amendments only in relation to issues affecting Action Plan success and consistency. It will be the responsibility of the jurisdiction considering the amendment to either: 1. Demonstrate that the amendment will not violate Action Plan policies or the ability to meet Action Plan Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives; or 2. Propose modification to the Action Plan that will prevent the GPA from adversely affecting the regional transportation network. If neither of these can be done, approval of the General Plan amendment by a Contra Costa jurisdiction may lead to a finding of non-compliance with the Growth Management Program. If an MTSO is not met following implementation of the Action Plan, the GPA would need to be reevaluated through the forum of LPMC and SWAT. Amendments to the Plan could include a relaxation of MTSOs, a strengthening of actions, or a combination of these approaches. In certain cases, the MTSOs, as forecast, may exceed their prescribed thresholds under growth already included in the adopted general plans. This event alone will not result in a local jurisdiction being found out of compliance with the Measure J Growth Management Plan. However, any GPAs that are proposed must not adversely affect the policies or MTSOs of the Action Plan. In the case of MTSOs that already exceed the thresholds, the GPA must not make it worse. If there are MTSO exceedances, or projected MTSO exceedances, in a Lamorinda jurisdiction, then that jurisdiction can either (a) implement transportation improvements to correct the MTSO deficiency on that affected network segment, or (b) implement other measures intended to result in measurable improvements to MTSOs on the Routes of Regional Significance network. Failing this, the jurisdiction can refer the problem to the LPMC for joint resolution.

68 76

7.3 Action Plan Monitoring and Review The Action Plans are to be monitored by CCTA to determine whether or not the MTSOs are being met. If it is determined through the monitoring process that the MTSOs are not being met, the Action Plans may require modification and/or an update. The following steps are envisioned for Action Plan review:  Regularly monitor all Regional Routes of Significance to determine MTSO compliance (by CCTA);  If the results of the monitoring effort show that a regional route has exceeded the adopted MTSO, a focused Action Plan may be prepared by the RTPC;  A complete review of the Lamorinda Action Plan shall be conducted on a four- to five-year cycle (jointly by the RTPC and CCTA) in coordination with updates to the Authority’s Countywide Transportation Plan Update.

7.4 Process for Addressing MTSO Exceedances As noted above, from time to time, the MTSOs are monitored to determine whether they are being achieved. In addition, the MTSOs are evaluated to determine if they can be achieved in the future. For this update to the Lamorinda Action Plan, the MTSOs were monitored in 2013, and the traffic forecasts were prepared and evaluated for 2040. In both cases, exceedances of the adopted MTSOs were observed. Under adopted CCTA policy, exceedance of an MTSO does not constitute a compliance issue with the Growth Management Program. There is no consequence to local jurisdictions if an MTSO is exceeded over time and not the result of a single project. The primary purpose of the MTSOs is to provide a quantitative measure of transportation system performance that can be consistently applied as a metric for gauging the impacts of future growth and mitigating those impacts. The MTSOs adopted for this Plan are by no means the “lowest common denominator.” To the contrary, they reflect a broader objective of LPMC to ensure an acceptable level of mobility for its residents and workers in order to sustain the economy and maintain quality of life. It is not surprising, therefore, given the level of expected growth in Lamorinda, coupled with the constraints on adding new capacity to the system, that the MTSOs would be exceeded either today or in the future. When an exceedance has been determined, either through monitoring or during the Action Plan update process, the only action required under this Plan is that LPMC document the condition, and continue to monitor and address the MTSOs

69 77

in future updates to the Plan under the timeframe established in Section 7.3 above. In the case where a proposed development project or General Plan Amendment causes an exceedance, or exacerbates a situation where an already exceeded MTSO is still further exceeded, then the procedures in Section 7.2 regarding development applications review and general plan amendments shall apply.

70 78

Appendix A: Detailed MTSO Monitoring Values and Forecasts for the Lamorinda Action Plan

71 79

Table A-1: Lamorinda MTSOs based on Projections 2011 Route MTSO 2013 Monitoring Report P2011 – 2040 No Project P2011 – 2040 With Actions Maintain a Delay Index (DI) of 2.0 (2.5 after 2030) or better during AM: 1.0 (EB), 1.5 (WB) AM: 1.5 (EB), 2.4 (WB) AM: 1.4 (EB), 1.7 (WB) peak hour (including freeway on- PM: 1.4 (EB), 1.3 (WB) PM: 2.0 (EB), 1.7 (WB) PM: 1.7 (EB), 1.7 (WB) SR-24 ramps) Caldecott Tunnel to I-680 Maintain a Delay Index (DI) of 1.5 Delay Index is below 1.5 for all Delay Index is below 1.5 for all Delay Index is below 1.5 for all or better for all but the six most but the six most congested hours but the six most congested but the six most congested hours congested hours of the day. of the day. hours of the day. of the day.

Maintain a loading factor of 1.5 The MTSO is not exceeded in The MTSO is not exceeded in The MTSO is not exceeded in BART pax/seat or better during each any hour of service. any hour of service. any hour of service. hour of service

Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or AM: N/A (NB), 1.2 (SB) AM: 1.5 (NB), 1.4 (SB) AM: 1.3 (NB), 1.3 (SB) better during peak hour PM: 1.4 (NB), N/A (SB) PM: 1.8 (NB), 2.1 (SB) PM: 1.6 (NB), 1.9 (SB) Pleasant Hill AM: 1 cycle, except for Spring AM: 1 cycle, except for Spring AM: 1 cycle, except for Spring Road Maintain a maximum wait time Hill Rd intersection (2 cycles) Hill Rd intersection (2 cycles) Hill Rd intersection (2 cycles) Taylor Boulevard for drivers on side streets wishing PM: 1 cycle, except for PM: 1 cycle, except for PM: 1 cycle, except for SR-24 to access Pleasant Hill Road or intersections at Green Valley intersections at Green Valley intersections at Green Valley Taylor Boulevard of one signal Dr, and Spring Hill Rd (2 Dr, and Spring Hill Rd (2 Dr, and Spring Hill Rd (2 cycle or fewer. cycles) cycles) cycles) Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or AM: N/A (NB), 1.2 (SB) AM: 1.4 (NB), 1.6 (SB) AM: 1.3 (NB), 1.5 (SB) Camino Pablo / better during peak hour PM: 1.2 (NB), N/A (SB) PM: 1.4 (NB), 1.1 (SB) PM: 1.3 (NB), 1.0 (SB) San Pablo Dam The maximum wait time for AM: 1 cycle, except for Wildcat AM: All intersections have 1 AM: All intersections have 1 Road drivers on side streets wishing to Canyon Rd intersection (2 cycle wait for side streets. cycle wait for side streets. Wildcat Canyon access San Pablo Dam Road or cycles) PM: All intersections have 1 PM: All intersections have 1 Rd to SR-24 Camino Pablo should be no PM: All intersections have 1 cycle wait for side streets. cycle wait for side streets. greater than one signal cycle. cycle wait for side streets. Note: MTSOs added in 2014 update were not monitored for 2013 Bold – MTSO value is below standard Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

72 80

Table A-2: SR 24 Eastbound Freeway Segment Analysis –Delay Index (MTSO = 2 prior to 2030, = 2.5 after 2030) P2011 - 2040 P2011 - 2040 2013 Observations Freeway Segment No Project with Actions AM PM AM PM AM PM EB off to Gateway Blvd-EB on 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.4 1.7 from Gateway Blvd EB on from Gateway Blvd-EB 0.9 1.5 1.6 3.7 1.5 2.5 off to Camino Pablo EB off to Camino Pablo-EB on 1.0 1.4 1.5 2.5 1.4 2.0 from Bryant Way EB on from Bryant Way-EB 0.9 1.5 1.1 2.1 1.1 1.8 off to St Stephens EB off to St Stephens-EB on 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.4 from St Stephens Dr EB on from St Stephens Dr-EB 1.0 1.7 2.1 3.2 1.9 2.4 off to Acalanes Rd EB off to Acalanes Rd-Seg EB 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.9 1.3 1.6 on fromom Acalanes Rd EB on from Acalanes Rd-EB 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.8 Off to Oak Hill Rd EB off to Oak Hill Rd-EB on 1.0 1.2 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 from First St EB on from First St-EB off to 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.4 Pleasant Hill EB off to Pleasant Hill-EB on 1.0 1.5 1.6 2.3 1.5 2.0 from Pleasant Hill EB on from Pleasant Hill-Seg 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.6 1.1 1.5 EB off to Mt Diablo Seg EB off to Mt Diablo-EB off 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.6 1.6 1.9 to Ignacio Way Corridor Average 1.0 1.4 1.5 2.0 1.4 1.7 Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

73 81

Table A-3: SR 24 Westbound Freeway Segment Analysis –Delay Index (MTSO = 2 prior to 2030, = 2.5 after 2030) P2011 - 2040 P2011 - 2040 2013 Observations Freeway Segment No Project with Actions AM PM AM PM AM PM WB on from Gateway Blvd- 1.9 1.6 3.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 WB off to Gateway Blvd WB off to Gateway Blvd-WB 2.3 1.8 3.9 1.5 2.4 1.5 on from Camino Pablo WB on from Camino Pablo-WB 2.4 1.8 3.9 1.8 2.5 1.7 on from Camino Pablo WB off to Camino Pablo-WB 3.0 2.3 4.6 1.6 3.2 1.6 on from St Stephens Dr WB on from St Stephens Dr- 1.7 1.3 2.1 1.6 1.7 1.5 WB off to St Stephens Dr WB off to St Stephens-WB on 1.4 1.3 2.3 2.1 1.6 2.0 from Acalanes/Nido WB on from Acalanes/Nido- 1.2 1.1 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.6 WB off to Acalanes/Nido WB off to Acalanes/Nido-WB 1.2 1.0 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.8 on from Deer Hill Rd WB on from Deer Hill Rd-WB 1.4 1.2 1.7 2.2 1.4 2.2 off to Deer Hill Rd WB off to Deer Hill Rd-WB on 1.5 1.2 2.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 from Pleasant Hill WB on from Pleasant Hill-WB 1.5 1.2 2.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 off to Pleasant Hill WB off to Pleasant Hill-I-680 1.3 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.6 1.2

Corridor Average 1.5 1.3 2.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

74 82

Table A-4: San Pablo Dam Road Northbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index MTSO 2013 P2011 - 2040 P2011 - 2040 Arterial Segment Delay Observations No Project with Actions Index AM PM AM PM AM PM SR24 WB ramps-Camino 2.0 N/A N/A 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 Sobrante Camino Sobrate-Orinda Wy 2.0 N/A N/A 3.0 1.6 3.0 1.6

Orinda Wy-Miner Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2

Miner Rd-Ardilla Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 2.6 2.0 2.3 2.0

Ardilla Rd-North Ln 2.0 N/A N/A 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9

North Ln-Claremont Ave 2.0 N/A N/A 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.0 Claremont Ave-Manzanita 2.0 N/A N/A 2.0 4.6 1.7 4.6 Rd Manzanita Rd-Los 2.0 N/A N/A 2.2 1.4 1.8 1.4 Amigos/Sports Field Los Amigos/Sports 2.0 N/A N/A 2.1 1.4 1.7 1.5 Field/Monte Vista Rd Monte Vista Rd-Wildcat 2.0 N/A N/A 1.9 1.2 1.6 1.2 Canyon Rd Wildcat Canyon Rd-Castro 2.0 N/A N/A 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 Ranch Rd Corridor Average 2.0 N/A 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

75 83

Table A-5: San Pablo Dam Road Southbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index MTSO 2013 P2011 - 2040 P2011 - 2040 Arterial Segment Speed Observations No Project with Actions (mph) AM PM AM PM AM PM SR24 WB ramps-Camino 2.0 N/A N/A 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.3 Sobrante Camino Sobrate-Orinda Wy 2.0 N/A N/A 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.3

Orinda Wy-Miner Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3

Miner Rd-Ardilla Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 2.7 1.8 2.1 1.1

Ardilla Rd-North Ln 2.0 N/A N/A 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.1

North Ln-Claremont Ave 2.0 N/A N/A 2.5 2.1 2.0 1.3 Claremont Ave-Manzanita 2.0 N/A N/A 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 Rd Manzanita Rd-Los 2.0 N/A N/A 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.2 Amigos/Sports Field Los Amigos/Sports 2.0 N/A N/A 2.1 1.3 2.0 1.2 Field/Monte Vista Rd Monte Vista Rd-Wildcat 2.0 N/A N/A 3.1 1.6 3.0 1.4 Canyon Rd Wildcat Canyon Rd-Castro 2.0 N/A N/A 1.3 0.9 1.2 0.9 Ranch Rd Corridor Average 2.0 1.2 N/A 1.6 1.1 1.5 1.0

Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

76 84

Table A-6: Pleasant Hill Road Northbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index MTSO 2013 P2011 - 2040 P2011 - 2040 Arterial Segment Delay Observations No Project with Actions Index AM PM AM PM AM PM SR-24-Deer Hill Rd/Stanley 2.0 N/A N/A 1.8 2.1 1.7 2.1 Rd Deer Hill Rd/Stanley Blvd- 2.0 N/A N/A 2.2 2.6 1.4 1.5 Spring Hill Rd Spring Hill Rd-Reliez Valley 2.0 N/A N/A 2.1 2.6 1.3 1.6 Rd Reliez Valley Rd-Green Valley 2.0 N/A N/A 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 Dr Green Valley Dr-Rancho View 2.0 N/A N/A 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Dr Rancho View Dr-Geary Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2

Geary Rd-Grayson Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.7

Grayson Rd-Westover Dr 2.0 N/A N/A 2.0 2.4 1.9 2.3

Westover Dr-Taylor Blvd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.3 2.7 1.2 2.6

Corridor Average 2.0 N/A 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.6 Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

77 85

Table A-7: Pleasant Hill Road Southbound Arterial Segment Analysis – Delay Index MTSO 2013 P2011 - 2040 P2011 - 2040 Arterial Segment Delay Observations No Project with Actions Index AM PM AM PM AM PM SR-24-Deer Hill Rd/Stanley 2.0 N/A N/A 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.7 Rd Deer Hill Rd/Stanley Blvd- 2.0 N/A N/A 2.1 4.5 1.3 4.0 Spring Hill Rd Spring Hill Rd-Reliez 2.0 N/A N/A 2.5 5.0 1.6 4.6 Valley Rd Reliez Valley Rd-Green 2.0 N/A N/A 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.5 Valley Dr Green Valley Dr-Rancho 2.0 N/A N/A 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 View Dr Rancho View Dr-Geary Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1

Geary Rd-Grayson Rd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.9

Grayson Rd-Westover Dr 2.0 N/A N/A 1.5 3.4 1.5 2.8

Westover Dr-Taylor Blvd 2.0 N/A N/A 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.3

Corridor Average 2.0 1.2 N/A 1.4 2.1 1.3 1.9 Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

78 86

Table A-8: BART Loading Factor P2011 - 2040 With MTSO 2013 Observations P2011 - 2040 No Project Service Actions Loading Hour Factor Eastbound Westbound Eastbound Westbound Eastbound Westbound

4 1.5 0.06 0.66 0.07 0.84 0.05 0.45 5 1.5 0.28 0.95 0.35 0.90 0.19 0.48 6 1.5 0.27 1.14 0.35 1.19 0.23 1.15 7 1.5 0.21 1.23 0.27 1.29 0.25 1.25 8 1.5 0.19 1.21 0.24 0.84 0.13 0.81 9 1.5 0.15 0.70 0.18 0.88 0.10 0.47 10 1.5 0.16 0.58 0.20 0.74 0.11 0.39 11 1.5 0.25 0.53 0.32 0.67 0.17 0.36 12 1.5 0.56 0.31 0.71 0.39 0.38 0.21 13 1.5 0.72 0.25 0.91 0.32 0.49 0.17 14 1.5 0.88 0.25 1.12 0.32 0.59 0.17 15 1.5 1.39 0.32 1.76 0.40 0.94 0.21 16 1.5 1.16 0.44 1.35 0.56 1.31 0.30 17 1.5 1.11 0.33 1.04 0.42 1.00 0.33 18 1.5 0.97 0.24 0.58 0.30 0.56 0.16 19 1.5 0.64 0.15 0.61 0.19 0.32 0.10 20 1.5 0.56 0.12 0.71 0.15 0.57 0.12 21 1.5 0.49 0.22 0.62 0.28 0.49 0.22 22 1.5 0.37 0.09 0.47 0.12 0.38 0.09 23 1.5 0.44 0.03 0.56 0.04 0.44 0.03 Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

79 87

Table A-9: Side-Street Intersection Delay MTSO (Max 2013 Field P2011 - 2040 P2011 - 2040 Secondary (Cross) # Primary Street Wait Time Observations No Project With Actions Street in Cycles) AM PM AM PM AM PM 1 Pleasant Hill Road Rancho View Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Pleasant Hill Road Green Valley Dr 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 Pleasant Hill Road Reliez Valley Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 Pleasant Hill Road Spring Hill Rd 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Deer Hill Rd/ 5 Pleasant Hill Road 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Stanley Blvd Willdcat Canyon 6 Camino Pablo 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Rd 7 Camino Pablo Monte Vista Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Los Amigos/ 8 Camino Pablo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sports Field Manzanita Rd/ 9 Camino Pablo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Claremont Ave North Ln/ Ardilla 10 Camino Pablo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rd 11 Camino Pablo Minor Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 Camino Pablo Orinda Wy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 Camino Pablo Camino Sobrante 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Source: CCTA MTSO Monitoring Report, 2013 and CCTA Travel Model, 2014

80 88

Appendix B: Detailed Segment-Level Analysis of Route Characteristics and Needs

81 89

Lamorinda Secondary Routes of Regional Significance

Pleasant Hill Road

Possible MTSOs and Segment Segment Characteristics Roadway Characteristics Needs Possible Actions Performance Measures SR-24 to o Semi-rural character o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics MTSOs o Complete the sidewalk to fill the gaps Rancho View o Acalanes High School & o Left and right turn lanes o Maintain the number of roadway lanes o Delay Index o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- Drive Springhill Elementary School o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides o Pedestrian and bicycle access to schools, o Cross Street Delay mode services o Acalanes Park (on east side running up to Reliez o More frequent bus or other alternative o Intersection Level of Service o Coordinate Lafayette, Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill o Access to community Valley Rd) mode service, Performance Measures and Contra Costa procedures/practices for traffic swimming pool o Sidewalks on west side of street o Improve travel time reliability o Availability of pedestrian and management during lane or road closure o AM peak congestion from mostly absent bicycle facilities o Examine adaptive signal timing school access, o Pedestrian path between o Vehicle crash frequency o Extend pedestrian and bicycle facilities from south o Commute route, Springhill Rd and Reliez Valley Rd o Pedestrian or bicycle injury part of Pleasant Hill north to Spring Hill Road o AM and PM commute on west side crash frequency o Install speed warning signs congestion o Frequency of lane closures o Increase pedestrian safety devices o Access to SR 24, residential access

Rancho View o Semi-rural character o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics MTSOs o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- Drive to Taylor o Commute route o Class II bicycle facility on west side o Maintain the number of roadway lanes o Delay Index mode services Blvd o Limited to no sidewalk of street; Class III bicycle facility o More frequent bus or other alternative o Cross Street Delay o Coordinate procedures/practices for traffic on east side of street mode service o Intersection Level of Service management during lane or road closure o No pedestrian facilities o Reduce collisions Performance Measures o Install speed warning signs o Improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities o Availability of pedestrian and o Reduce the speed limit on Taylor Boulevard at bicycle facilities approach to Pleasant Hill Road o Vehicle crash frequency o Create bike lane cross-over from Pleasant Hill Road o Pedestrian or bicycle injury to Taylor Boulevard crash frequency o Improve pedestrian and bicycle access o Frequency of lane closures

82 90

Camino Pablo/San Pablo Dam Road

Possible MTSOs and Segment Segment Characteristics Roadway Characteristics Needs Possible Actions Performance Measures Moraga Way to o Access to Downtown o 5 lanes (3 northbound, 2 o Preserve segment characteristics MTSOs o Improve multi-modal access to BART for Lamorinda SR 24 commercial southbound) o Maintain the number of roadway lanes o Delay Index residents o Priority Development Area o Left turn lanes o Encourage safer traffic speeds o Cross Street Delay o Complete the pedestrian and bicycle network o Access to SR 24 o Intermittent stretches of medians o Initiate alternative-mode service to BART o Average Vehicle Occupancy o Enhance speed warnings and enforcement o Access to Orinda BART o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides and Downtown Performance Measures o Improve access to EB SR-24 station (south side lanes begin past the SR 24 o Improve pedestrian crossings o Availability of pedestrian and o Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety o Commute route ramps) o Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety bicycle facilities o Sidewalks on both sides of the road o Vehicle crash frequency (south side begins past the SR 24 o Pedestrian or bicycle injury eastbound off-ramps) crash frequency o Frequency of lane closures SR 24 to Orinda o Access to Downtown o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics MTSOs o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- Way commercial o Left and right turn lanes o Improve bicycle safety, Preserve segment o Delay Index mode services o Priority Development Area o Intermittent stretches of landscaped characteristics o Cross Street Delay o Complete the pedestrian and bicycle network o Access to SR 24 medians o Maintain the number of roadway lanes o Average Vehicle Occupancy o Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety o Access to Orinda BART o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides o Initiate alternative-mode service to BART Performance Measures station o No pedestrian facilities; pedestrian and Downtown o Availability of pedestrian and o Residential access bridge over SR 24 ramps connects to o Improve pedestrian crossings bicycle facilities o Commute route Orinda Way, which runs parallel to o Vehicle crash frequency Camino Pablo o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency o Frequency of lane closures Orinda Way to o Suburban character o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics MTSOs o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- Miner Rd o Residential access o Right turn lanes o Maintain the number of roadway lanes o Delay Index mode services o Commute route o Landscaped median present at o Improve multi-modal access to BART for o Cross Street Delay o Complete the pedestrian and bicycle network Orinda Way approach Lamorinda residents o Average Vehicle Occupancy o Class II bicycle lanes on west side o Increase pedestrian and bicycle safety Performance Measures o Narrow sidewalk on east side o Improve pedestrian crossings o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle facilities o Vehicle crash frequency o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency o Frequency of lane closures Miner Rd to o Semi-rural character o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics MTSOs o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- Bear Creek o Residential access o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides o Maintain the number of roadway lanes o Delay Index mode services Rd/Wildcat o Commute route o Pedestrian path on east side to o Improve pedestrian crossings in vicinity of o Cross Street Delay o Complete the pedestrian and bicycle network Canyon Rd o Narrow and winding road Monte Vista Rd Wagner Ranch Elementary School o Average Vehicle Occupancy o Reconstruct utility infrastructure to reduce incidence o Access to Wagner Ranch o Improve reliability Performance Measures of lane or road closure Elementary o Availability of pedestrian and o Maintain vegetation and drainage to reduce o Residential access bicycle facilities incidence of lane or road closure. o Vehicle crash frequency o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash frequency o Frequency of lane closures

83 91

Lamorinda Interjurisdictional Routes

Moraga Way

Segment Segment Characteristics Roadway Characteristics Needs Possible Performance Measures Possible Actions Moraga Road o Moraga Downtown o 4 lanes Moraga Road to School o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Complete the pedestrian pathways and bike to Camino Commercial, Cultural, Retail Street o Pedestrian and bicycle access o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle lanes/routes Ricardo and Office District o 2 lanes School Street to Camino o Auto access to stores facilities o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- o Priority Development Area Ricardo o More frequent bus or other o Vehicle crash frequency mode services o Commute route o Left turn lanes alternative mode service o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash o Coordinate and Improve procedures of Lamorinda o Class III bicycle lanes on both sides frequency agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and with gaps o Delay index documenting lane or road closures o Sidewalks on both sides from o Frequency of lane closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for Moraga Road to School Street traffic management during lane or road closure Camino Ricardo o Miramonte High School o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Complete the pedestrian pathways and bike to Eastwood o AM peak congestion from o Left turn and right turn lanes o Pedestrian and bicycle access to o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle lanes/routes Drive school access o Class III bicycle lanes on both sides schools facilities o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- o Commute route with Moraga city limits o More frequent bus or other o Vehicle crash frequency mode services o AM and PM commute o Sidewalks on both sides with some alternative mode service o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash o Coordinate and Improve procedures of Lamorinda congestion gaps frequency agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and o Delay index documenting lane or road closures o Frequency of lane closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure Eastwood Drive o Semi-rural character, Orinda o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- to Overhill Intermediate and Del Rey o Left turn and right turn lanes o Pedestrian and bicycle access to o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle mode services Drive Elementary off of Moraga o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides schools facilities o Reconstruct utility infrastructure to reduce Way o No pedestrian facilities o More frequent bus or other o Vehicle crash frequency incidence of lane or road closure and possibly o AM peak congestion from alternative mode service o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash extend bicycle lane width school drop off o Increased reliability of roadway frequency o Maintain vegetation and drainage to reduce o Commute route (frequent lane or road closure) o Delay index incidence of lane or road closure and possibly o AM and PM commute o Frequency of lane closures extend bicycle lane width congestion o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda o Limited to no sidewalk agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and documenting lane or road closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure Overhill Drive o Orinda Theatre Square o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- to Bryant Way Commercial and Retail Area o Left turn and right turn lanes o Pedestrian and bicycle access o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle mode services o Priority Development Area o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides of o Auto access to stores facilities o Improve multi-modal access to BART for Lamorinda o Access to BART station the road between Overhill Road and o Improved multi-modal access to o Vehicle crash frequency residents o Access to SR 24 Camino Pablo BART for Lamorinda residents o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash o Coordinate and Improve procedures of Lamorinda o Sidewalks on both sides o More frequent bus or other frequency agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and alternative mode service o Delay index documenting lane or road closures o Improve access to EB SR-24 o Frequency of lane closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure o Improve access to EB SR-24

84 92

Mount Diablo Boulevard

Segment Segment Characteristics Roadway Characteristics Needs Possible Performance Measures Possible Actions Happy Valley o Downtown Lafayette o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- Road to Brown Commercial, Cultural, Retail o Raised median with left turn lanes o Improve multi-modal access to BART o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle mode services Avenue and Office District o No right-turn only lanes except at for Lamorinda residents facilities o Initiate school bus service to Acalanes High School o Multifamily housing eastbound Moraga Road o Provide incentives to employees to o Vehicle crash frequency and Stanley Middle School o Priority Development Area o Class III bicycle lanes on both sides encourage alternative modes and o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash o Increase capacity of BART service o Access to BART station between Mountain View Drive decrease parking demand while frequency o Improve multi-modal access to BART for Lamorinda o Access to SR 24 and First Street improving supply where needed o Delay index residents o On-street parking o Sidewalks on both sides o Increase pedestrian and bicycle o Frequency of lane closures o Design pedestrian and bicycle facilities to connect safety Plus with the new EBMUD Trail o Improve pedestrian crossings o Intersection level of service o Complete the pedestrian network o Discourage diversion from freeway o Add more bike parking o Reduce congestion o Improve signal timing

85 93

Moraga Road

Segment Segment Characteristics Roadway Characteristics Needs Possible Performance Measures Possible Actions Moraga Way to o Moraga Downtown o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- St. Mary’s Road Commercial Area o Raised median with left turn lanes o Improve pedestrian and bicycle o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle mode services to BART station o Priority Development Area and right turn lanes access to businesses facilities o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda o Multi-family housing o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides o Improve auto access to stores and o Vehicle crash frequency agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and o Commute route o Sidewalks on parts of both sides apartments o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash documenting lane or road closures frequency o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for o Delay index traffic management during lane or road closure o Frequency of lane closures

St. Mary’s Road o Semi-rural o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Complete the pedestrian pathways and bike to Corliss Drive o Bordered by park and creek o Left turn and right turn lanes o Improve pedestrian and bicycle o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle lanes/routes as identified in the adopted Livable Multi-use trail o Narrow Class II bicycle lanes on access to park and trail facilities facilities Moraga Road project. o No housing frontage both sides o Vehicle crash frequency o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- o Commute route o Multi use path on east side o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash mode services to BART station frequency o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda o Delay index agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and o Frequency of lane closures documenting lane or road closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure Corliss Drive to o Residential frontage o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Complete the pedestrian pathways and bike Donald Drive o Access to Rheem Elementary o Left turn and right turn lanes o Improve pedestrian and bicycle o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle lanes/routes as identified in the adopted Livable School o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides access to schools Lafayette-Moraga facilities Moraga Road project. o Commute route o No pedestrian facilities Trail and commercial districts o Vehicle crash frequency o s o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- frequency mode services o Delay index o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda o Frequency of lane closures agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and documenting lane or road closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure Donald Drive to o Rheem commercial area o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Complete the pedestrian pathways and bike Dolores Court o Medium density housing o Mix of left turn lanes and center o Improve pedestrian and bicycle o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle lanes/routes as identified in the adopted Livable o Commute route two-way left turn lane access to businesses facilities Moraga Road project. o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides o Improve auto access to stores o Vehicle crash frequency o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- o Sidewalks on both sides form o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash mode services Donald Drive to Rheem Boulevard frequency o Improve existing communications between o Sidewalks on the west side of the o Delay index Lamorinda agencies for detecting, reporting, road north of Rheem Boulevard o Frequency of lane closures announcing and documenting lane or road closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure Dolores Court o Residential o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Complete the pedestrian pathways and bike to Via o Campolindo High School o Mix of left turn, right turn and o Improve auto, pedestrian and o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle lanes/routes as identified in the adopted Livable Granada/Sky Commute route center two-way left-turn lanes bicycle access to school facilities Moraga Road project. Hy Drive o Class II bicycle lanes on both sides o Reduce commute and school trip o Vehicle crash frequency o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- o Sidewalks on the west side congestion o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash mode services frequency o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda o Delay index agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and o Frequency of lane closures documenting lane or road closures

86 94

o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure

Moraga Road (Continued)

Segment Segment Characteristics Roadway Characteristics Needs Possible Performance Measures Possible Actions Via o Residential access via o 2 lanes, minimal shoulder, open o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- Granada/Sky driveways on a very narrow drainage o Improve pedestrian and bicycle o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle mode services Hy Drive to Old and winding road o Left turn lanes facilities facilities o Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety Mountain View o Semi-rural character o No bicycle or pedestrian facilities o Slow driving speeds o Vehicle crash frequency o Reconstruct utility infrastructure to reduce Drive/Silver o Steep gradients and high o Reduce vehicle collisions o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash incidence of lane or road closure and possibly Springs Road embankments o Side street ingress and egress frequency extend bicycle lane width o Commute route o Delay index o Maintain vegetation and improve drainage to o Access to schools o Frequency of lane closures reduce incidence of lane or road closure and o SR-24 and downtown possibly extend bicycle lane width Lafayette o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda o AM, mid-afternoon and PM agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and commute congestion documenting lane or road closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure Old Mountain o Residential frontage o 2 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- View o Commute route o Left turn lanes o Reduce commute and school trip o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle mode services Drive/Silver o AM, mid-afternoon and PM o No bicycle lanes congestion facilities o Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety Springs Road to commute congestion o Wide multi-purpose pathways o Improvement of pedestrian facilities o Vehicle crash frequency o Reconstruct utility infrastructure to reduce St Mary’s Road o Access to schools with split rail fence on both sides o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash incidence of lane or road closure and possibly o SR-24 and downtown of the road north of Hamlin frequency extend bicycle lane width Lafayette Road/Tanglewood Drive o Delay index o Maintain vegetation and improve drainage to o Frequency of lane closures reduce incidence of lane or road closure and Plus possibly extend bicycle lane width o Cross-street delay o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and documenting lane or road closures o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure St Mary’s Road o Lafayette Elementary School, o 4 lanes o Preserve segment characteristics Core Performance Measures o Increase availability and frequency of alternative- to Mount Stanley Middle School, and o Left turn lanes, right turn lane at o Improve pedestrian and bicycle o Availability of pedestrian and bicycle mode services Diablo St. Perpetua School Mt. Diablo Blvd access to school Lafayette-Moraga facilities o Evaluate opportunities for adaptive signal timing Boulevard o Day cares centers o No bicycle lanes, bike route trail and commercial districts o Vehicle crash frequency o Implement recommendations of the future o Church and theater between Moraga Blvd and Brook o Reduce commute and school trip o Pedestrian or bicycle injury crash Downtown Congestion Study o Downtown Lafayette Street congestion frequency o Identify and implement better connection of Commercial o Narrow sidewalks both sides of o Delay index Downtown bike lanes to the Lafayette-Moraga Trail o Priority Development Area the road o Frequency of lane closures o Coordinate and improve procedures of Lamorinda Access to BART station Plus agencies for detecting, reporting, announcing and o Commute route o Intersection level of service documenting lane or road closures o Cross-street delay o Coordinate Lamorinda procedures/practices for traffic management during lane or road closure o Widening of existing pedestrian/bike facilities

87 95

Lafayette-Moraga Regional Trail

Segment Segment Characteristics Trail Characteristics Needs Possible Performance Measures Possible Actions Canyon Rd to o Semi-rural o Mixed use, paved path o Enhance safety at trail crossings Core Performance Measures o Improvement of pedestrian and bike facility on the Country Club o Approximately 9-10 ft wide o Reduce conflicts between users o Pedestrian and bicycle volumes roads that cross the trails Dr o Improve directional signage to trail o Auto volumes at crossings o Provide connections from trail to school and park o Increase trail crossing visibility and o Average trail user delay at major road o Street crossing improvement and striping lighting crossings o Widen with continuous unpaved shoulder o Pavement upkeep o Frequency of pedestrian or bicyclist o Speed and rule enforcement injury at crossings o Enhanced directional signage o Pavement condition o Improve way –finding to the Valle Vista trailhead

Country Club o Semi-rural character o Sidewalk running along Country o Enhance safety at trail crossings o Core Performance Measures o Complete the off-road trail at gaps Dr to Moraga o Low-density commercial area Club Dr and School St o Reduce conflicts between users o Pedestrian and bicycle volumes o Widen with continuous unpaved shoulder Rd o Residential frontage o No bicycle facilities present-ride o Improve directional signage to trail o Auto volumes at crossings o Improve the marking and signage (until off-road on the street o Increase trail crossing visibility and o Average trail user delay at major road portion is completed) lighting crossings o Improve lighting on road segments o Provide off-road trail o Frequency of pedestrian or bicyclist o Enhanced directional signage o Pavement upkeep injury at crossings o Pavement condition

Moraga Rd to o Semi-rural character o Mixed use, paved path o Enhance safety at trail crossings Core Performance Measures o Enhanced directional signage So Lucille Ln o Approximately 9 ft wide o Reduce conflicts between users o Pedestrian and bicycle volumes o Enhance delineation of the trail within the Moraga o Bordered by trees and creek o Improve directional signage to trail o Auto volumes at crossings Common o Partially shaded o Increase trail crossing visibility and o Average trail user delay at major road o Widen with continuous unpaved shoulder lighting crossings o Enhance safety at the trail crossing with Rheem o Pavement upkeep o Frequency of pedestrian or bicyclist Boulevard injury at crossings o Pavement condition

So Lucille Ln to o Semi-rural character o Mixed-use, paved path o Enhance safety at trail-crossings Core Performance Measures o Link Buckeye Field with trail Pleasant Hill Rd o Trail behind residences and o Approximately 9 ft wide o Reduce conflicts between users o Pedestrian and bicycle volumes o Implement School St. at Topper improvements other buildings o Partially shaded o Improve directional signage to trail o Auto volumes at crossings o Implement School St. connection for school access o Bordered by flat, grassy area o Increase trail crossing visibility and o Average trail user delay at major road o Widen with continuous unpaved shoulder o Narrow trail bridge near Glenside lighting crossings o Provide connection to Iron Horse Trail Drive that does not allow two-way o Pavement upkeep o Frequency of pedestrian or bicyclist o Enhanced directional signage bicycle flow injury at crossings o Replace narrow bridge near Glenside Drive o Pavement condition

88 96

Supplementary Information – Attachments

1.a Resolution 61‐19 97 98 99 100

Supplementary Information – Attachments

3.a.1 2018 Housing Element Report 101 G.3

AGENDA TITLE: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018

RECOMMENDATION: Review the Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 and direct staff to file the Report with the appropriate state agencies.

BACKGROUND:

As required by State law (Government Code Section 65400), staff prepared the Annual Progress Report (APR) on implementation of the Housing Element contained in Attachment A. This report must be considered at a public meeting of the City Council and members of the public must have an opportunity to provide oral testimony and written comments. Reports are due April 1st of each year for the preceding year and are considered overdue 60 days after April 1st.

SUMMARY:

APRs are to be completed using forms development by the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). As shown in the attached report, building permits were issued for a total of 55 dwelling units during the calendar year 2018. Of the 55 units, 51 were detached, market-rate, single-family homes and 4 were market- rate accessory dwelling units. A majority of the permits issued were for single-family units in the Wilder subdivision.

The attached 2018 City of Orinda APR implements new, more detailed reporting requirements from HCD. This includes new reporting categories such as Table C, “Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need” (in other words, new sites rezoned for increased housing densities that were not included in the City’s certified Housing Element; Orinda has done no such rezoning during the reporting year). An overview of the new reporting requirements can be found here: http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/docs/Webinar-APR- Presentation-1-29-19.pdf

NEXT STEPS:

Based on Council review and direction, staff will file the report with the Department of Housing and Community Development and the State Office of Planning and Research.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Packet Pg. 94 102 G.3

Approving the Annual Progress Report does not have a fiscal impact. However, there could be legal costs to the City if the report is not approved by the City Council in a timely manner based on Government Code Section 65400, which states in part:

If a court finds, upon a motion to that effect, that a city, county, or city and county failed to submit, within 60 days of the deadline established in this section, the housing element portion of the report required pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) that substantially complies with the requirements of this section, the court shall issue an order or judgment compelling compliance with this section within 60 days.

ATTACHMENTS: A. Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 B. Government Code Section 65400 (as amended)

Respectfully Submitted by: Drummond Buckley Director of Planning

Prepared By: Drew Taplin, Planning Technician

Approved by:

Packet Pg. 95 103 G.3.a

Please Start Here

General Information Submittal Instructions

Jurisidiction Name Orinda Housing Element Annual Progress Reports (APRs) forms and tables must be Reporting Calendar Year 2018 submitted to HCD and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1 of each year for the prior calendar year; submit separate reports Contact Information directly to both HCD and OPR pursuant to Government Code section 65400. First Name Drummond There are two options for submitting APRs: Last Name Buckley 1. Online Annual Progress Reporting System (Preferred) - This enters your Title Director of Planning information directly into HCD’s database limiting the risk of errors. If you would like to use the online system, email [email protected] and HCD will send you the login Email [email protected] information for your jurisdiction. Please note: Using the online system only provides Phone (925) 253-4210 the information to HCD. The APR must still be submitted to OPR. Their email address is [email protected]. Mailing Address Street Address 2. Email - If you prefer to submit via email, you can complete the excel Annual 22 Orinda Way Progress Report forms and submit to HCD at [email protected] and to OPR at City Orinda [email protected]. Please send the Excel workbook, not a scanned or PDF copy Zipcode 94563 of the tables. v 3_6_19 Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Annual Progress Report January 2019Packet Pg. 96 104 G.3.a

Table A Housing Development Applications Submitted Total Total Date Approved Disapproved Project Identifier Unit Types Application Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Streamlining Notes Units by Units by Submitted Project Project 1 2 34 5 678 9 10 Total Was APPLICATION Tenure Very Low- Low- Moderate- DISAPPROVED SUBMITTED Unit Category Date Very Low- Low-Income Moderate- Above Total Local Jurisdiction Income Non Income Income Total PROPOSED Units by Project Pursuant to GC Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ (SFA,SFD,2 to Application Income Deed Non Deed Income Deed Moderate- APPROVED Notes+ Tracking ID+ R=Renter Deed Deed Non Deed Units by Project (Auto-calculated 65913.4(b)? 4,5+,ADU,MH) Submitted Restricted Restricted Restricted Income Units by project O=Owner Restricted Restricted Restricted Can Be (SB 35 Overwritten) Streamlining) Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 748 55 55 264-260-012 261 Monte Vista Ridge ADU O 8/2/2018 111No Road 266-250-013 119 Melody Lane ADU O 9/4/2018 111No 268-033-005 13 Muth Drive ADU O 12/11/2018 111No 262-042-026 140 Camino Sobrante ADU O 5/14/2018 111No 273-330-010 20 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 2/28/2018 111 No 273-330-012 16 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 4/4/2018 111 No 273-330-008 21 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 2/28/2018 111 No 273-380-020 87 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-380-019 85 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-380-017 81 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-380-024 88 Grassy Hill Way' SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-380-023 93 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 4/10/2018 111 No 273-380-022 91 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-380-028 22 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-380-025 86 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-380-018 83 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 3/30/2018 111 No 273-360-002 53 Wilder Road SFD O 4/20/2018 111 No 268-490-005 38 Oakridge Lane SFD O 10/9/2018 111 No 273-360-012 98 Dairy Creek Lane SFD O 5/29/2018 111 No 266-340-003 16 Honeywood Road SFD O 7/7/2018 111 No 265-051-015 221 El Toyonal SFD O 8/4/2018 111 No 273-350-015 75 Windy Creek Way SFD O 6/20/2018 111 No 273-320-012 25 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 8/29/2018 111 No 262-212-015 38 Los Dedos SFD O 11/30/2018 111 No 273-360-018 80 Dairy Creek Lane SFD O 9/19/2018 111 No 273-360-008 83 Dairy Creek Lane SFD O 3/20/2018 111 No 273-330-013 12 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 11/1/2018 111 No 273-300-014 33 Bigleaf Road SFD O 11/14/2018 111 No 273-340-006 98 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 9/1/2018 111 No 273-350-001 91 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 9/1/2018 111 No 273-350-002 95 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 9/1/2018 111 No 273-350-003 97 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 9/1/2018 111 No 273-350-004 99 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 9/1/2018 111 No 273-370-001 8 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 12/11/2018 111 No 273-370-002 10 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 12/11/2018 111 No 273-370-003 12 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 12/11/2018 111 No 273-380-015 52 Tomcat Way SFD O 12/20/2018 111 No 273-380-029 26 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 12/20/2018 111 No 273-380-030 28 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 12/20/2018 111 No 273-330-014 10 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 12/20/2018 111 No 273-065-026 56 Brookwood Road SFD O 4/10/2018 111 No 273-380-013 58 Tomcat Way SFD O 2/13/2018 111 No 273-380-005 61 Tomcat Way SFD O 2/13/2018 111 No 273-380-011 62 Tomcat Way SFD O 2/13/2018 111 No 273-380-004 59 Tomcat Way SFD O 2/13/2018 111 No 273-380-006 63 Tomcat Way SFD O 2/13/2018 111 No 273-380-012 60 Tomcat Way SFD O 2/13/2018 111 No

273-380-007 65 Tomcat Way SFD O 2/13/2018 111 No Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Packet Pg. 97 105 G.3.a

Table A2 Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units

Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Inco

1 234 567

Tenure Very Low- Very Low- Unit Category Very Low- Low- Income Low- Income Moderate- Moderate- Above Entitlement Very Low- Low- Income Low- Income Local Jurisdiction Income Non # of Units issued Income Non Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ (SFA,SFD,2 to Income Deed Deed Non Deed Income Deed Income Non Moderate- Date Approved Income Deed Deed Non Deed Tracking ID+ R=Renter Deed Entitlements Deed 4,5+,ADU,MH) Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Deed Restricted Income Restricted Restricted Restricted O=Owner Restricted Restricted

y Row: Start Data Entry Below 740 47 264-260-012 261 Monte Vista ADU O 8/2/2018 1 1 Ridge Road 266-250-013 119 Melody Lane ADU O 1 9/4/2018 1 268-033-005 13 Muth Drive ADU O 1 12/11/2018 1 273-330-010 20 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 13/13/2018 1 273-330-012 16 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 14/26/2018 1 273-330-008 21 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 13/13/2018 1 273-380-020 87 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-380-019 85 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-380-017 81 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-380-024 88 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-380-023 93 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 1 5/2/2018 1 273-380-022 91 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-380-028 22 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-380-025 86 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-380-018 83 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 14/20/2018 1 273-360-002 53 Wilder Road SFD O 1 5/3/2018 1 273-360-012 98 Dairy Creek Lane SFD O 16/15/2018 1 266-340-003 16 Honeywood Road SFD O 17/17/2018 1 265-051-015 221 El Toyonal SFD O 1 10/17/2018 1 273-350-015 75 Windy Creek Way SFD O 1 7/3/2018 1 273-320-012 25 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 1 9/14/2018 1 262-212-015 38 Los Dedos SFD O 1 12/4/2018 1 273-360-018 80 Dairy Creek Lane SFD O 1 10/4/2018 1 273-330-013 12 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 1 11/20/2018 1 273-300-014 33 Bigleaf Road SFD O 1 12/6/2018 1 273-340-006 8 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 1 9/11/2018 1 273-350-001 1 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 1 9/11/2018 1 273-350-002 5 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 1 9/11/2018 1 273-350-003 7 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 1 9/11/2018 1 273-350-004 9 Monkey Flower Lane SFD O 19/11/2018 1 273-065-026 56 Brookwood Road SFD O 15/22/2018 1 273-380-013 58 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-005 61 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-011 62 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-004 59 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-006 63 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-012 60 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-007 65 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-009 68 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-008 67 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-380-014 56 Tomcat Way SFD O 1 3/5/2018 1 273-360-006 61 Wilder Road 2 to 4 O 114/19/2018 2 273-310-013 50 Boeger Ranch SFD O Road 260-050-006 7 Oak Flat Road SFD O 264-240-005 19 La Encinal SFD O 273-140-013 4 Sunrise Hill SFD O 268-481-002 564 Tahos Road SFD O 262-010-043 52 Mira Loma ADU O 1 1/2/2018 1 Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Packet Pg. 98 106 G.3.a

Project Identifier omes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy Streamlining

1 8910 11 12 13 14 # of Units Was Project Certificates of Very Low- issued How many of APPROVED using Moderate- Moderate- Above Very Low- Low- Income Low- Income Moderate- Moderate- Above Occupancy or other Building Permits # of Units Issued Income Non Certificates of the units were GC 65913.4(b)? Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Income Deed Income Non Moderate- Income Deed Deed Non Deed Income Deed Income Non Moderate- forms of readiness Date Issued Building Permits Deed Occupancy or Extremely Low (SB 35 Restricted Deed Restricted Income Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Deed Restricted Income (see instructions) Restricted other forms of Income?+ Streamlining) Date Issued readiness Y/N try Below 451 55 436 40 264-260-012 261 Monte Vista N Ridge Road 266-250-013 119 Melody Lane N 268-033-005 13 Muth Drive N 273-330-010 20 Paintbrush Lane 1 7/19/2018 1 N 273-330-012 16 Paintbrush Lane 1 9/13/2018 1 N 273-330-008 21 Paintbrush Lane 1 7/13/2018 1 N 273-380-020 87 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-019 85 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-017 81 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-024 88 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-023 93 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-022 91 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-028 22 Wild Lilac Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-025 86 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-380-018 83 Grassy Hill Way 1 9/12/2018 1 N 273-360-002 53 Wilder Road 1 7/3/2018 1 N 273-360-012 98 Dairy Creek Lane 1 9/4/2018 1 N 266-340-003 16 Honeywood Road 1 12/7/2018 1 N 265-051-015 221 El Toyonal N 273-350-015 75 Windy Creek Way 1 11/6/2018 1 N 273-320-012 25 Paintbrush Lane N 262-212-015 38 Los Dedos N 273-360-018 80 Dairy Creek Lane N 273-330-013 12 Paintbrush Lane N 273-300-014 33 Bigleaf Road N 273-340-006 8 Monkey Flower Lane N 273-350-001 1 Monkey Flower Lane N 273-350-002 5 Monkey Flower Lane N 273-350-003 7 Monkey Flower Lane N 273-350-004 9 Monkey Flower Lane N 273-065-026 56 Brookwood Road N 273-380-013 58 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-005 61 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-011 62 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-004 59 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-006 63 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-012 60 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-007 65 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-009 68 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-008 67 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-380-014 56 Tomcat Way 1 5/17/2018 1 N 273-360-006 61 Wilder Road 117/25/2018 2 N 273-310-013 50 Boeger Ranch 1 2/6/2018 N Road 1 260-050-006 7 Oak Flat Road 1 5/30/2018 1 N 264-240-005 19 La Encinal 1 2/28/2018 1 N 273-140-013 4 Sunrise Hill 1 6/19/2018 1 N 268-481-002 564 Tahos Road 1 7/16/2018 1 N 262-010-043 52 Mira Loma 1 2/13/2018 1 1 7/31/2018 1 N Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Packet Pg. 99 107 G.3.a

Housing without Financial Housing with Financial Assistance Term of Affordability Project Identifier Infill Assistance or Deed Demolished/Destroyed Units Notes and/or Deed Restrictions or Deed Restriction Restrictions 1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 For units affordable without financial assistance or deed Demolished/ Term of Affordability or Number of Assistance Programs Deed Restriction restrictions, explain how the Demolished Destroyed Infill Units? Deed Restriction (years) Demolished/ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ for Each Development Type locality determined the units or Destroyed Units Notes+ Y/N+ (if affordable in perpetuity Destroyed (see instructions) (see instructions) were affordable Units+ Owner or enter 1000)+ Units+ (see instructions) Renter+

try Below 264-260-012 261 Monte Vista Ridge Road 266-250-013 119 Melody Lane 268-033-005 13 Muth Drive 273-330-010 20 Paintbrush Lane 273-330-012 16 Paintbrush Lane 273-330-008 21 Paintbrush Lane 273-380-020 87 Grassy Hill Way 273-380-019 85 Grassy Hill Way 273-380-017 81 Grassy Hill Way 273-380-024 88 Grassy Hill Way 273-380-023 93 Grassy Hill Way 273-380-022 91 Grassy Hill Way 273-380-028 22 Wild Lilac Way 273-380-025 86 Grassy Hill Way 273-380-018 83 Grassy Hill Way 273-360-002 53 Wilder Road 273-360-012 98 Dairy Creek Lane 266-340-003 16 Honeywood Road 265-051-015 221 El Toyonal 273-350-015 75 Windy Creek Way 273-320-012 25 Paintbrush Lane 262-212-015 38 Los Dedos 273-360-018 80 Dairy Creek Lane 273-330-013 12 Paintbrush Lane 273-300-014 33 Bigleaf Road 273-340-006 8 Monkey Flower Lane 273-350-001 1 Monkey Flower Lane 273-350-002 5 Monkey Flower Lane 273-350-003 7 Monkey Flower Lane 273-350-004 9 Monkey Flower Lane 273-065-026 56 Brookwood Road 273-380-013 58 Tomcat Way 273-380-005 61 Tomcat Way 273-380-011 62 Tomcat Way 273-380-004 59 Tomcat Way 273-380-006 63 Tomcat Way 273-380-012 60 Tomcat Way 273-380-007 65 Tomcat Way 273-380-009 68 Tomcat Way 273-380-008 67 Tomcat Way 273-380-014 56 Tomcat Way 273-360-006 61 Wilder Road 273-310-013 50 Boeger Ranch Road 260-050-006 7 Oak Flat Road 264-240-005 19 La Encinal 273-140-013 4 Sunrise Hill 268-481-002 564 Tahos Road 262-010-043 52 Mira Loma Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Packet Pg. 100 108

Table B Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress Permitted Units Issued by Affordability 1 2 34 G.3.a RHNA Allocation Total Units to Total Remaining Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 RHNA by Income by Income Level Date (all years) Level

Deed Restricted 84 84 Very Low Non-Deed Restricted Deed Restricted 47 47 Low Non-Deed Restricted Deed Restricted 54 13 41 Moderate Non-Deed Restricted 274 Above Moderate 42 44 53 37 51 185 Total RHNA 227 Total Units 44 55 44 55 198 172 Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Packet Pg. 101 109

Table C Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need

Project Identifier Date of Rezone Affordability by Household Income Type of Shortfall Sites Description

1 2 3 45678 9 1011 Local Above Moderate - Type of Shortfall Parcel Size General Plan Minimum Maximum Realistic Description of Existing APN Street Address Project Name+ Jurisdiction Date of Rezone Very-Low Income Low-Income Moderate Income Zoning Vacant/Nonvacant G.3.a Income (Acres) Designation Density Allowed Density Allowed Capacity Uses Tracking ID+ Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Packet Pg. 102 110 G.3.a

Table D Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

Housing Programs Progress Report Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

123 4 Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation

Facilitate the production of at least 42 new single-family homes (suitable for moderate- and above moderate income households) between 2014 and 2022 (RHNA period). Facilitate completion of 8 units of owner- ACTION 1.A: ORINDA GROVE occupied housing affordable to moderate DEVELOPMENT income households on the former Pine Building permits for 41 units at Orinda Grove were issued in 2013 Facilitate redevelopment/reuse of the former Grove School site. Provide for a diversity and permits for the remaining 32 units were issued in 2014. The Pine Grove School as a mixed-income of housing types to meet current and future 2014-2015 below market rate program for the development was established and the application residential development including 8 moderate- needs of all process for affordable units was completed. By the end of 2015, all units were income housing units and 65 market-rate residents without compromising the semi- constructed and final building inspections had been conducted. housing units. rural character of Orinda's single-family neighborhoods. Encourage planned unit developments, which allow variations from development standards provided that the overall density of the site remainsconsistent with the General Plan.

Facilitate completion of 66 units of 2014 housing for very low- and extremely low- income seniors at the Monteverde Senior Apartments Project. Provide for a diversity ACTION 1.B: MONTEVERDE SENIOR of housing types to meet current and future APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT needs of all residents without Facilitate continued development and compromising the semi-rural character of construction of the Monteverde Senior Orinda's single-family neighborhoods. Apartments development on the former Orinda Construction was completed in November 2014 and the development was fully Participate in those housing assistance 31-Dec-14 Library site. This development will produce 66 occupied in December 2014. programs that are most appropriate to units of housing for very low- and extremely low- Orinda's setting and demographcis, with income seniors at a density of 48 units per acre an amphasis on programs that benefit and is anticipated to be completed in local seniors and those who live or work in December 2014. Orinda. Continue to provide density bonusesfor housing that includes dedicated affordable untis or units set aside for seniors, consistent with state law.

ACTION 1.C: PROMOTION OF SECOND UNITS Continue to implement a public information and outreach campaign via the City’s website and the Orinda City newsletter to inform property owners of the standards for second unit development and the importance of second Encourage the incluson of second units in units to Orinda. Provide information to new single-family homes, and support the Building permits for three second units were issued in 2015, encourage residents to apply for second units, creation of such units in existing single- two in 2016, seven were issued in 2017, and four in 2018. Applicants at the Planning particularly where their homes already include family homes, subject to design criteria of Department counter are informed of the second unit standards and, as appropriate, space that is configured for a conforming the Zoning Ordinance and building code encouraged to consider including a second unit in their development proposals. As of second unit (e.g., carriage houses, au pair standards as well as neighborhood January 1, 2017, state law overrides local ordinances and requires local jurisdictions to quarters, second kitchens on floors with compatibility considerations. Facilitate the ministerially approve certain second units, also known as "accessory dwelling units" separate entrances). The City will produce a development of 57 second units between Ongoing (ADUs) if units meet a set of minimum standards. Since this new law went into effect, flyer regarding second units and provide the 2014 and 2022. Based on prevailing there has been an increase in resident interest in construction of ADUs and multiple flyer at the Planning Department counter and to market rents (and the analysis in Chapter plans have been submitted and approved by the Planning Department. On August 1, project applicants for all discretionary land use 4 of this element), it is presumed that 2 of 2017, the City Council approved Ordinance 17-03 consistent with the new state law, applications. On average, a total of 93 these units will be affordable to very low- allowing for increased awareness and opportunities for ADU construction. 2018 discretionary land use applications, mainly for income households, 13 to low-income matched the number of entitlements issued for second units in 2017, and it is residential development projects, are households, and 38 to moderate-income anticipated that interest will continue. considered annually by the Planning households. Department. Many of the projects are on property that could support the development of a second unit. In addition, the City will publish at least annually informational materials pertaining to second units through a combination of media including the City’s website and direct mailings.

Promote the registration and legalization of existing second units in the city that meet current zoning and building safety standards, including those which ACTION 1.D: LEGALIZATION OF EXISTING are in active use as rental housing and UNREGISTERED SECOND UNITS those with the potential to be used as Notify property owners that under the revised rental units. Facilitate development of 57 See statement above regarding Action 1C. One building permit was issued in 2018 for Ongoing second dwelling unit standards, formerly illegal second units between 2014 and 2022. the legalization of an existing second unit that was entitled and reported in 2017. second units may possibly now meet the Based on prevailing market rents (and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. analysis in Chapter 4 of this element), it is Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : APR 2018) presumed that 2 of these units will be affordable to very low-income households, 13 to low-income households, and 38 to moderate-income households.

Encourage the incluson of second units in new single-family homes, and support the creation of such units in existing single- family homes, subject to design criteria of the Zoning Ordinance and building code ACTION 1.E: SECOND UNITS IN WILDER standards as well as neighborhood See statement above regarding Action 1C. To date, approvals have been granted for 7 (GATEWAY VALLEY) compatibility considerations. Facilitate second units in the Wilder subdivision. The Planning Department staff continue to Encourage builders in the Wilder development development of 57 second units between Ongoing inform Wilder developers of this Housing Element objective, and many of the approved to include second units in new homes or to 2014 and 2022. Based on prevailing plans have an option of including or converting square footage to second units. One incorporate space with the flexibility for second market rents (and analysis in Chapter 4 of such project was approved in 2018. unit conversions in the future. this element), it is presumed that 2 of these units will be affordable to very low- income households, 13 to low-income households, 38 to moderate-income households.

Packet Pg. 103 111 G.3.a

Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation

Participate in those housing assistance ACTION 1.F: AFFORDABLE HOUSING Through the City’s affordable housing program, 66 units restricted to extremely low- programs that are most appropriate to INCENTIVE PROGRAM and very low-income households were developed at a density greater than allowed Orinda's setting and demographcis, Continue to implement the City’s affordable without the program for the with an amphasis on programs that benefit housing incentive program (density bonus Monteverde Senior Housing project. Without the program local seniors and those who live or work in ordinance), which grants up to a 35 percent Ongoing approximately 55 units would have been allowed on the project site. The development Orinda. increase in the number of permitted units for was competed in November 2014 and fully Facilitate completion of 66 units of housing developments which set aside 20 percent or occupied in December 2014. The City will continue to implement the Affordable for very low- and extremely low-income more of their units as affordable, as defined by Housing Incentive Program. The City will continue to seniors at the Monteverde Senior state law. meet with interested housing developers on an ongoing basis. Apartments Project.

Participate in those housing assistance ACTION 1.G: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO programs that are most appropriate to The City worked successfully with Eden Housing to develop 66 units affordable to ORGANIZATIONS THAT CAN DEVELOP OR Orinda's setting and demographcis, extremely low- and very low-income senior households at the Monteverde Senior PRESERVE LOWER-COST HOUSING with an amphasis on programs that benefit Housing project. The project includes one manger’s unit affordable at the moderate Provide outreach and assistance to nonprofit local seniors and those who live or work in income level. The City will continue to meet with interested housing developers on an Ongoing organizations and builders whose expertise Orinda. ongoing basis. When applications for affordable units or mixed-income housing can inure to the benefit of low- and moderate- Facilitate completion of 66 units of housing developments are received, the City will proactively work with the applicants to address income Orinda residents, particularly seniors for very low- and extremely low-income issues of concern, such as parking, traffic and design, and will continue to explore and those with special needs. seniors at the Monteverde Senior ways to reduce the cost of developing such housing in Orinda on a case-by-case basis. Apartments Project.

ACTION 2.A: ASSISTANCE TO LOWER- Encourage reinvestment in the city's The City continues to participate in Contra Costa County's housing INCOME SENIOR HOMEOWNERS housing stock by private property owners. rehabilitation program. Due to limited time and resources, the City Participate in Contra Costa County’s housing Encourage 10 existing very low-income did not take additional steps to advertise the program's availability rehabilitation program, and publicize the Ongoing Orinda households to participate in the during the planning period. The City will begin coordinating with County staff and availability of the County’s low interest loan County’s major rehabilitation loan advertise the program in the city newsletter at least annually, and will post programs for lower-income seniors and other program. information/links to the City's website. households.

Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing stock by private property owners. Encourage the preservation of existing ACTION 2.B: PARTICIPATION IN FIRST-TIME affordable housing in the city, including the The City continues to participate in Contra Costa County's First Time Home Buyer and HOMEBUYER AND MCC PROGRAMS Orinda Senior Village, and existing second Mortgage Credit Certificate programs. Due to limited time and resources, the City did Participate in the County’s First-Time units and rental apartments. Conserve 2015 not take additional steps to advertise the program's availability during the planning Homebuyer and Mortgage Credit Certificate Orinda's existing supply of smaller and period. As noted in the Housing Element, the City will coorindate with County staff on (MCC) programs. more affordable single-family homes, implementing this program more proactively. including older two- and three-bedroom homes on lots smaller than 10,000 square feet.

ACTION 2.C: HOME MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROGRAMS Encourage reinvestment in the city's Advertise the availability of existing home housing stock by private property owners. maintenance, repair, and improvement Preserve 100 percent of the existing multi- The City participates in Contra Costa County's Neighborhood programs such as the low- and zero-interest family rental units in the city through 2023. 2015 Preservation Program. Due to limited time and resources, the City loans offered through Contra Costa County’s Preserve 100 percent of the existing (advertising) did not take additional steps to advertise the program's availability Neighborhood Preservation Program. Consider housing in the city's nonresidential zoning and 2017 during the planning period. As noted in the Housing Element, the City will coorindate applying for additional grant funding to assist districts through 2023. Encrourage 10 (funding) with County staff on implementing this program more proactively in 2019. homeowners with addressing ADA accessibility existing very low-income Orinda modifications to their homes. Conduct code households to participate in the County's enforcement on a complaint-driven basis to major rehabiltiation loan program. address safety and code compliance issues.

ACTION 2.D: SECOND UNIT RENT DATA Encourage the preservation of existing The City collected and monitored data periodically on second unit Continue to collect and monitor data on Ongoing affordable housing in the city, rents using online rental forums such as Craigslist. As noted in the second unit rents to better understand their including Ongoing Housing Element, the City will create a survey on second units which will be updated role in the Orinda housing market and the the Orinda Senior Village, and existing annually by the Planning Department. income groups they serve. second units and rental apartments.

Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing stock by private property owners. ACTION 2.E: FLOOR AREA RATIO LIMITS Conserve Orinda's existing supply of Planning Staff continues to successfully implement this program Maintain a sliding scale for calculating floor smaller and more affordable single-family Ongoing through the structure size limitations of the City’s Zoning Code area ratios (FAR) as a way to preserve the homes, including older two- and three- (Orinda Municipal Code Section 17.6.8). city’s existing stock of smaller homes. bedroom homes on lots smaller than 10,000 square feet.

Encourage reinvestment in the city's ACTION 2.F: DESIGN AWARDS AND housing stock by private property owners. RECOGNITION Conserve Orinda's existing supply of In 2016, a Mayor's Award was presented for Eden Housing's Develop a new category in the Mayor’s smaller and more affordable single-family 2015 Monteverde Senior Housing project, which included 66 multifamily Awards for Architectural Excellence for small homes, including older two- and three- units. A Mayor's Award was not awarded for architecture in 2018. homes or modifications to existing small bedroom homes on lots smaller than homes. 10,000 square feet.

There is information on some of the available energy cost reduction ACTION 2.G: REDUCTION IN HOME assistance programs in the Planning Department waiting area. Per ENERGY COSTS Encourage reinvestment in the city's Ongoing the Housing Element, the Planning Department will update Continue to advise residents of programs for housing stock by private property owners. information on energy assistance programs in the waiting area and reducing residential energy costs. will make links available on the City's website. ACTION 2.H: TITLE 24 ADMINISTRATION Implemented by Building Inspection Department staff through the Continue to enforce residential energy Encourage reinvestment in the city's application of the building codes. The 2016 Building Code took effect on January 1, Ongoing Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : APR 2018) conservation requirements as set forth in Title housing stock by private property owners. 2017 and presents more challenging energy savings targets compared to the 2013 24, California Administrative Code. Building Code.

Continue to allow multi-family ACTION 3.A: DOWNTOWN The City continues to allow residential units above commercial uses that are part of a residential uses above the ground floor Study the feasibility of mixed-use development 2018 mixed use development with a general use permit per Orinda Municipal Code Sections within Orinda’s Downtown Commercial at appropriate densities. 17.8.4 and 17.31. zoning district.

ACTION 3.B: ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN Meet annually with at least one Construction of 66 units of housing for very low- and extremely low-income seniors at STANDARDS TO IMPROVE affordable housing developer or the Monteverde Senior Apartments Project was AFFORDABILITY representative of an affordable housing completed in December 2014. This project made use of the City's Implement the City’s Affordable Housing advocacy group to discuss housing issues, Affordable Housing Incentive Program to build at a higher density Incentive Program to reduce production costs needs and opportunities in Orinda. than usually allowed by code. The City will continue to meet with interested housing in projects containing affordable units such as 2015 Encourage larger-scale residential developers on an ongoing basis. When applications for affordable units or mixed- adjusting design standards on a case-by-case developments to include a mix of unit income housing developments are received, the City will proactively work with the basis, which could include adjusting standards types, including smaller units and units applicants to address issues of concern, such as parking, traffic and design, and will for setbacks, lot coverage, street width, unit that are affordable to lower- and moderate- continue to explore ways to reduce the cost of developing such housing in Orinda on a size, and parking, for all affordable housing income households. case-by-case basis. projects.

Encourage the sharing of housing units by ACTION 3.C: SHARED HOUSING PROGRAM homeowners seeking to age in place or Consider participating in ECHO housing’s Due to limited time and staff resources since approval of the supplement their income. Shared housing “Shared Housing” or some similar program as Housing Element in 2015, the city did not take action to pursue a can provide an important resource for 2016 a way to improve housing opportunities for partnership with ECHO or other similar program to establish a shared senior housing seniors, young adults, and others in the lower-income seniors and extremely low- program in Orinda during the 2018 calendar year. This action will be pursued in 2019. community who cannot afford their own income Orinda residents. home or apartment.

Packet Pg. 104 112 G.3.a

Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation

ACTION 3.E: HOUSING SITE(S) As a part of the 5th Cycle Housing Element, the City considered anew whether to rely on the 3.2 acre Santa Maria site to help meet the City’s RHNA for lower income households. The City selected the Santa Maria site in EIR Alternative 1 to zone at up to 20 dwelling units per acre (the “default density” under State law) Maintain an adequate number and in order to accommodate 48 units of the City’s variety of sites to meet the City’s Within 2 allocation of lower income households. Regional Housing Needs Allocation. Meet years of On March 15, 2016, the Orinda City council approved revisions to Through this Action, the City will initiate and Orinda's Regional Housing Needs Adoption of the use permit process in the RM District consistent with Action 3E of the Housing process an amendment of the development Allocation mandates through a Housing Element. policies (i.e., general plan, zoning and/or combination of second units and Element zoning map) applicable on the selected site to rezoning of adequate land area at the replace the existing High Density Overlay default density. District on the site with policies to accommodate a total of 48 units at up to 20 dwelling units per acre (the “default density” under State law). This will be a public process. The precise wording of the development policies and configuration of the area covered will be determined through that public process.

Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and approval processes do not unduly ACTION 4.A: REVISE THE USE PERMIT Within 1 year constrain or delay the construction of On March 15, 2016, the Orinda City council approved revisions to REQUIREMENTS of adoption housing. City procedures should be the use permit process in the RM District consistent with Action 3E of the Housing Revise the use permit process in the of Housing consistent with Permit Streamlining Act Element. Residential Medium-Density (RM) District. Element requirements and should not include unreasonable fees or regulations.

Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and approval processes do not unduly constrain or delay the construction of housing. City procedures should be consistent with Permit Streamlining Act requirements and should not include ACTION 4.B: REDUCTION OF PERMITTING unreasonable fees or regulations. Make a COSTS AND DELAYS "completeness" determination for planning Planning Staff continues to be responsive to applicants and Explore the feasibility of expanding the City’s applications within two weeks or less for successfully make completeness determinations ahead of the 30- Affordable Housing Incentive Program to add Ongoing 80 percent of all applications received, day completeness deadline. Development impact fee waivers are provisions for reductions in application rather than available for affordable housing projects. processing costs for multi-family projects waiting the full 30 days allowed by the containing affordable units. Permit Streamlining Act. Provide at least one workshop or training seminar a year to assist owners, builders, contractors, and others with understanding Orinda's development process and requirements.

ACTION 4.C: SHARED PARKING Consider flexibility in development REGULATIONS standards, such as reduced parking Exceptions to the parking regulations are considered on a case-by-case basis. Consider adopting shared parking regulations requirements for senior housing, in order 2016 Consideration of a shared parking program is pending. where it can be demonstrated that there will be to accommodate additional affordable no parking shortages. units and reduce housing costs.

ACTION 4.D: BUILDING CODE UPDATES Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and Latest building code and local amendments adopted in January Continue to implement the California Building approval processes do not unduly 2017. Revised small-scale solar PV streamlining requirements Code of Regulations as locally amended. Ongoing constrain or delay the construction of adopted in 2015. The building code is administered by the Contra Update or amend the codes as state housing. Costa County Building Department. requirements change. ACTION 4.E: FEE UPDATES Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and Periodically review planning and building fees approval processes do not unduly The Planning Department's fees are updated annually to reflect to ensure they cover required costs but are not Annually constrain or delay the construction of actual processing costs. The 2020 fiscal year fee schedule will take effect July 1, 2019. Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : APR 2018) more than is necessary to provide the required housing. City services. Continue to promote equal housing opportunity for all Orinda residents and others seeking housing in the city, regardless of race, religion, marital/family status, ethnic background, or other This policy remains active. There were no fair housing complaints in 2018. The City ACTION 5.A: FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM arbitrary factors. Support programs that periodically includes housing inforamtion in a Distribute information regarding fair housing educate and inform residents about fair Ongoing quarterly newsletter. Articles regarding affordable homeownership issues in the City’s quarterly newsletter, at housing laws, the Regional Housing opportunities at Orinda Grove and the status of the Monteverde the Orinda Library, and at City offices. Needs Senior Apartments project were included in past newsletters. Allocation process, and the City's obligations under state housing law. Follow up on 100 percent of all fair housing complaints received by the City.

ACTION 5.B: LOCAL PREFERENCE IN Support programs that educate and inform HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES residents about fair housing laws, the The local preference program provisions were incorporated into the Continue measures to ensure that persons Regional Housing Needs Allocation Ongoing established below market rate program for the Orinda Grove project. This action will be who work in Orinda receive preference in the process, and the City's obligations under continued for other development projects. occupancy of new affordable for-sale housing state housing law. units.

ACTION 5.C: ASSISTANCE FOR PERSONS Encourage the development of WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES. housing designed to meet the unique Support the construction and rehabilitation of needs of seniors and persons with housing to meet the needs of Orinda Several of the units in the Monteverde project included universal disabilities. The City endorses the concept residents with developmental disabilities, Ongoing design features to accommodate the unique needs to seniors and of universal design, wherein all new including small group homes and units in persons with disabiltiies. This action will be continued. construction and renovations affordable housing developments that are are designed to recognize the varying designed for developmentally disabled levels of mobility in the population. persons.

Packet Pg. 105 113 G.3.a

Table E Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7

Description of Commercial Commercial Development Bonus Project Identifier Units Constructed as Part of Agreement Development Bonus Date Approved

1 2 34

Local Jurisdiction Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Description of Commercial Commercial Development Bonus APN Street Address Project Name+ Tracking ID+ Income Income Income Income Development Bonus Date Approved

Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Annual Progress Report JanuaryPacket 2019 Pg. 106 114 G.3.a

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title 25 §6202) Jurisdiction Orinda Note: + Optional field Reporting Period 2018 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas

Table F Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(2)

This table is optional. Jurisdictions may list (for informational purposes only) units that do not count toward RHNA, but were substantially rehabilitated, acquired or preserved. To enter units in this table as progress toward RHNA, please contact HCD at [email protected]. HCD will provide a password to unlock the grey fields. Units may only be credited to the table below when a jurisdiction has included a program in its housing element to rehabilitate, preserve or acquire units to accommodate a portion of its RHNA which meet the specific criteria as outlined in Government Code section 65583.1(c)(2).

Units that Count Towards RHNA + Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+ Note - Because the statutory requirements severly limit what can be Listed for Informational Purposes Only counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you The description should adequately document how each to populate these fields. Activity Type unit complies with subsection (c)(7) of Government Code Section 65583.1+

Extremely Low- Extremely Low- Very Low- Income+ Very Low-Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Income+ Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Rehabilitation Activity

Preservation of Units At-Risk

Acquisition of Units

Total Units by Income Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Annual Progress Report January 2019

Packet Pg. 107 115

Jurisdiction Orinda Reporting Year 2018 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)

Entitled Units Summary Income Level Current Year Deed Restricted 0 0 Very Low Non-Deed Restricted Deed Restricted 0 0 Low Non-Deed Restricted Deed Restricted 0 7 Moderate Non-Deed Restricted

40 Above Moderate Total Units 47 Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals

Submitted Applications Summary Total Housing Applications Submitted: 54 Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received: 55 Total Housing Units Approved: 55 Total Housing Units Disapproved: 0

Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions G.3.a Number of Applications for Streamlining 0 Number of Streamlining Applications Approved 0 Total Developments Approved with Streamlining 0 Total Units Constructed with Streamlining 0

Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits Income Rental Ownership Total Very Low 000 Low 000 Moderate 000 Above Moderate 000 Total 000

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Attachment: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2018 (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

Packet Pg. 108 3/13/2018 Law section 116 G.3.b

Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites

Code: Select Code Section: Search

Up^ << Previous Next >> cross-reference chaptered bills PDF | Add To My Favorites Highlight GOVERNMENT CODE - GOV TITLE 7. PLANNING AND LAND USE [65000 - 66499.58] ( Heading of Title 7 amended by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536. ) DIVISION 1. PLANNING AND ZONING [65000 - 66210] ( Heading of Division 1 added by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536. ) CHAPTER 3. Local Planning [65100 - 65763] ( Chapter 3 repealed and added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 1880. )

ARTICLE 7. Administration of General Plan [65400 - 65404] ( Article 7 added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 1880. )

65400. (a) After the legislative body has adopted all or part of a general plan, the planning agency shall do both of the following: (1) Investigate and make recommendations to the legislative body regarding reasonable and practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open-space land and natural resources, and the efficient expenditure of public funds relating to the subjects addressed in the general plan. (2) Provide by April 1 of each year an annual report to the legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes all of the following:

(A) The status of the plan and progress in its implementation. (B) The progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs determined pursuant to Section 65584 and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583. The housing element portion of the annual report, as required by this paragraph, shall be prepared through the use of standards, forms, and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development. The department may review, adopt, amend, and repeal the standards, forms, or definitions, to implement this article. Any standards, forms, or definitions adopted to implement this article shall not be subject to Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2. Before and after adoption of the forms, the housing element portion of the annual report shall include a section that describes the actions taken by the local government towards completion of the programs and status of the local government’s compliance with the deadlines in its housing element. That report shall be considered at an annual public meeting before the legislative body where members of the public shall be allowed to provide oral testimony and written comments.

The report may include the number of units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from nonaffordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved consistent with the standards set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583.1. The report shall document how the units meet the standards set forth in that subdivision.

(C) The number of housing development applications received in the prior year. Attachment: Government Code Section 65400 (as amended) (1759 : Housing APR 2018) (D) The number of units included in all development applications in the prior year.

(E) The number of units approved and disapproved in the prior year. (F) The degree to which its approved general plan complies with the guidelines developed and adopted pursuant to Section 65040.2 and the date of the last revision to the general plan. (G) A listing of sites rezoned to accommodate that portion of the city’s or county’s share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory required by paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583 and Section 65584.09. The listing of sites shall also include any additional sites that may have been required to be identified by Section 65863.

(H) The number of net new units of housing, including both rental housing and for-sale housing, that have been issued a completed entitlement, a building permit, or a certificate of occupancy, thus far in the housing element http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV§ionNum=65400 Packet Pg. 1091/2 3/13/2018 Law section G.3.b 117 cycle, and the income category, by area median income category, that each unit of housing satisfies. That production report shall, for each income category described in this subparagraph, distinguish between the number of rental housing units and the number of for-sale units that satisfy each income category. The production report shall include, for each entitlement, building permit, or certificate of occupancy, a unique site identifier which must include the assessor’s parcel number, but may include street address, or other identifiers. (I) The number of applications submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 65913.4, the location and the total number of developments approved pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 65913.4, the total number of building permits issued pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 65913.4, the total number of units including both rental housing and for-sale housing by area median income category constructed using the process provided for in subdivision (b) of section 65913.4.

(J) The Department of Housing and Community Development shall post a report submitted pursuant to this paragraph on its Internet Web site within a reasonable time of receiving the report. (b) If a court finds, upon a motion to that effect, that a city, county, or city and county failed to submit, within 60 days of the deadline established in this section, the housing element portion of the report required pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) that substantially complies with the requirements of this section, the court shall issue an order or judgment compelling compliance with this section within 60 days. If the city, county, or city and county fails to comply with the court’s order within 60 days, the plaintiff or petitioner may move for sanctions, and the court may, upon that motion, grant appropriate sanctions. The court shall retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order or judgment is carried out. If the court determines that its order or judgment is not carried out within 60 days, the court may issue further orders as provided by law to ensure that the purposes and policies of this section are fulfilled. This subdivision applies to proceedings initiated on or after the first day of October following the adoption of forms and definitions by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), but no sooner than six months following that adoption. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 374, Sec. 1.5. (AB 879) Effective January 1, 2018.) Attachment: Government Code Section 65400 (as amended) (1759 : Housing APR 2018)

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV§ionNum=65400 Packet Pg. 1102/2 118

Supplementary Information – Attachments

3.a.2 2019 Housing Element Report 119

AGENDA TITLE: Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2019

RECOMMENDATION: Review the Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2019 and direct staff to file the Report with the appropriate state agencies.

BACKGROUND: As required by State law (Government Code Section 65400), staff prepared the Annual Progress Report (APR) on implementation of the Housing Element contained in Attachment A. This report must be considered at a public meeting of the City Council and members of the public must have an opportunity to provide oral testimony and written comments. Reports are due April 1st of each year for the preceding year with a 60-day grace period. Therefore, the submittal of the report is considered timely provided it is submitted by May30th.

SUMMARY: APRs are to be completed using forms developed by the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). As shown in the attached report, building permits were issued for a total of 40 dwelling units during the calendar year 2019. Of the 40 units, 33 were detached, above moderate income, single-family homes and 7 were moderate income (non-deed restricted) accessory dwelling units. Many of the permits issued were for single-family units in the Wilder subdivision.

The attached 2019 City of Orinda APR reflects the second year of implementing new, more detailed reporting requirements from HCD. This includes new reporting categories such as Table G, “Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of”.

Note that the actual report is submitted to HCD in Excel format based on a template they provide. Unfortunately, the template does not print or covert to pdf format very legibly. The easiest way to view the pdf of Orinda’s APR is online at this site (this is the same document included as Attachment A):  https://cityoforinda.app.box.com/v/housingelementreport

NEXT STEPS:

Based on Council review and direction, staff will file the report with the Department of Housing and Community Development and the State Office of Planning and Research.

FISCAL IMPACT: 120

ATTACHMENTS: A. City of Orinda Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2019

Respectfully Submitted by: Drummond Buckley Director of Planning

Prepared By: Drummond Buckley, Director of Planning

Approved by:

121

Please Start Here

General Information Jurisidiction Name Orinda 2019 Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used Reporting Calendar Year when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick Contact Information an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be First Name Drummond updated. Last Name Buckley Title Director of Planning Email [email protected] Phone 9252534210 Mailing Address Street Address 22 Orinda Way City Orinda Zipcode 94563 v 2_27_20 Jurisdiction Orinda ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field 122 Reporting Year 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas (CCR Title 25 §6202) Table A Housing Development Applications Submitted Total Total Date Approved Disapproved Project Identifier Unit Types Application Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Streamlining Notes Units by Units by Submitted Project Project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Total Was APPLICATION Tenure Very Low- Moderate- DISAPPROVED SUBMITTED Unit Category Date Very Low- Low-Income Low-Income Moderate- Above Total Local Jurisdiction Income Non Income Total PROPOSED Units by Project Pursuant to GC Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ (SFA,SFD,2 to Application Income Deed Deed Non Deed Income Deed Moderate- APPROVED Notes+ Tracking ID+ R=Renter Deed Non Deed Units by Project (Auto-calculated 65913.4(b)? 4,5+,ADU,MH) Submitted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Income Units by project O=Owner Restricted Restricted Can Be (SB 35 Overwritten) Streamlining)

Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 38 38 0 0 271236004 172 Ivy SFD O 10/7/2019 1 1 1 0 No SFD 1 80 Dairy Creek Lane O 1 1 0 No 273360018 2/20/2019 0 0 271052010 5 Altamount SFD O 3/14/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273370005 18 Wild Lilac SFD O 6/20/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273370006 20 Wild Lilac SFD O 6/20/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273380001 53 Tomcat Way SFD O 6/20/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273380002 55 Tomcat Way SFD O 6/20/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273370001 8 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 7/10/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273370002 10 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 7/10/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273370003 12 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 7/10/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273370004 16 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 7/10/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273380030 28 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 7/10/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273380015 52 Tomcat Way SFD O 7/10/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273380029 26 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 7/10/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273300010 25 Bigleaf Road SFD O 10/29/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273320012 25 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 3/14/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273330014 10 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 5/2/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273300014 33 Bigleaf Road SFD O 3/14/2019 1 1 1 0 No 266250041 105 Melody Lane SFD O 5/23/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340015 58 Windy Creek way SFD O 3/11/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340020 55 Windy Creek Way SFD O 3/6/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340021 57 Windy Creek Way SFD O 3/7/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340016 56 Windy Creek Way SFD O 3/29/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340019 53 Windy Creek Way SFD O 5/2/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340022 59 Windy Creek Way SFD O 4/30/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340017 52 Windy Creek Way SFD O 4/30/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273340018 51 Windy Creek Way SFD O 7/17/2019 1 1 1 0 No 269052001 47 Orchard Road SFD O 5/22/2019 1 1 1 0 No 268410014 31 Meadow View SFD O 11/13/2019 1 1 1 0 No 262181004 15 Dias Dorados SFD O 5/7/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273360008 83 Dairy Creek Lane SFD O 6/11/2019 1 1 1 0 No 273330013 12 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 7/17/2019 1 1 1 0 No 262023029 54 Linda Vista ADU O 9/9/2019 1 1 1 0 No 266250013 119 Melody Lane ADU O 1/3/2019 1 1 1 0 No 0 0 268033005 13 Muth Drive ADU O 3/6/2019 1 1 1 0 No 266081006 123 Van Ripper Lane ADU O 6/6/2019 1 1 1 0 No 268290018 222 Overhill ADU O 11/20/2019 1 1 1 0 No 269061002 209 Moraga Way ADU O 8/15/2019 1 1 1 0 No 123 Jurisdiction Orinda ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas (CCR Title 25 §6202)

Table A2 Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units

Housing with Financial Assistance Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy Streamlining Infill and/or Deed Restrictions

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

# of Units Certificates of Was Project Tenure Very Low- issued How many of the Unit Category Very Low- Very Low- Low- Income Low- Income Moderate- Moderate- Above Entitlement Very Low- Very Low- Low- Income Low- Income Moderate- Moderate- Above Very Low- Low- Income Low- Income Moderate- Moderate- Above Occupancy or other APPROVED using Assistance Programs Deed Restriction Local Jurisdiction # of Units issued Building Permits # of Units Issued Income Non Certificates of units were Infill Units? Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ (SFA,SFD,2 to Income Deed Income Non Deed Non Deed Income Deed Income Non Moderate- Date Approved Income Deed Income Non Deed Non Deed Income Deed Income Non Moderate- Income Deed Deed Non Deed Income Deed Income Non Moderate- forms of readiness GC 65913.4(b)? for Each Development Type Tracking ID+ R=Renter Entitlements Date Issued Building Permits Deed Occupancy or Extremely Low Y/N+ 4,5+,ADU,MH) Restricted Deed Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Deed Restricted Income Restricted Deed Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Deed Restricted Income Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Deed Restricted Income (see instructions) Date (SB 35 Streamlining) (see instructions) (see instructions) O=Owner Restricted other forms of Income?+ Issued Y/N readiness

Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 33 40 0 0 0 0 0 6 51 57 0 0 273300005 15 Bigleaf Road SFD O 0 0 1 5/7/2019 1 N 273380016 50 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 11/18/2019 1 N 89 Dairy creek Lane SFD O 0 1 1 N 273360011 0 2/26/2019 273350018 32 Wilder Road SFD O 0 0 1 1/31/2019 1 N 273300016 37 Bigleaf Road SFD O 0 0 1 7/26/2019 1 N 273350017 36 Wilder Road SFD O 0 0 1 1/31/2019 1 N 270190009 149 Hall Drive SFD O 0 0 1 1/15/2019 1 N 28 Vista Del Orinda SFD O 0 1 7/16/2019 1 N 265130015 0 51 Camino Del SFD O 0 1 7/23/2019 1 N 264092010 Diablo 0 271211001 183 Ardith Ct SFD O 0 0 1 5/16/2019 1 N 273370014 23 West Hill Way SFD O 0 0 1 1/24/2019 1 N 273370015 21 West Hill Way SFD O 0 0 1 1/2/2019 1 N 23 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 0 1 11/26/2019 1 N 273330009 0 262192015 7 El Campanero SFD O 0 0 1 4/22/2019 1 N 273310001 15 Wild Rye Way SFD O 0 0 1 1/29/2019 1 N 273360001 51 Wilder Road SFD O 0 0 1 10/14/2019 1 N 262191006 38 La Campana SFD O 0 0 1 2/25/2019 1 N 273370013 25 West Hill Way SFD O 0 0 1 2/12/2019 1 N 273370016 19 West Hill Way SFD O 0 0 1 3/15/2019 1 N 263052010 11 Bobolink Lane SFD O 0 0 1 11/27/2019 1 N 273380011 62 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 6/11/2019 1 N 270010001 417 Moraga Way SFD O 0 0 1 10/9/2019 1 N 273380003 57 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 9/13/2019 1 N 273380004 59 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 8/22/2019 1 N 273380005 61 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 7/31/2019 1 N 273380006 63 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 10/2/2019 1 N 273380007 65 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 7/25/2019 1 N 273380008 67 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 4/26/2019 1 N 273380009 68 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 5/15/2019 1 N 273380010 66 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 4/3/2019 1 N 273380012 60 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 5/24/2019 1 N 273380013 58 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 7/16/2019 1 N 273380014 56 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 0 1 7/10/2019 1 N 61 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 12/13/2019 1 N 273340023 Way 0 62 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 12/20/2019 1 N 273350009 Way 0 264240005 19 La Encinal SFD O 0 0 1 11/7/2019 1 N 21 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 0 1 10/16/2019 1 N 273330008 0 20 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 0 1 12/19/2019 1 N 273330010 0 65 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 12/9/2019 1 N 273350010 Way 0 81 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 0 1 11/26/2019 1 N 273380017 0 93 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 0 1 12/11/2019 1 N 273380023 0 86 Grassy Hill Way SFD O 0 1 12/18/2019 1 N 273380025 0 69 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 8/1/2019 1 N 273350012 Way 0 68 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 6/26/2019 1 N 273350007 Way 0 72 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 3/11/2019 1 N 273350005 Way 0 71 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 8/14/2019 1 N 273350013 Way 0 70 Windy Creek SFD O 0 1 3/27/2019 1 N 273350006 Way 0 262092006 34 La Vuelta SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2019 1 N 271031001 75 La Cresta Road SFD O 0 0 1 5/24/2019 1 N 2 Camino Del Cielo SFD O 0 1 3/22/2019 1 N 265060006 0 1 Dalewood Terrace SFD O 0 1 9/20/2019 1 N 261042014 0 140 Camino 262042030 ADU O 0 1 10/3/2019 1 N Sobrante 0 261172014 513 Miner Road ADU O 0 0 1 4/10/2019 1 N 268033005 13 Muth Drive ADU O 0 1 5/14/2019 1 1 12/20/2019 1 N 262142009 2 La Senda ADU O 0 0 1 1/15/2019 1 N 272210014 26 Lost Valley Drive ADU O 0 1 1/3/2019 1 N 0 262132005 52 Miner Road ADU O 0 0 1 10/4/2019 1 N 271236004 172 Ivy SFD O 0 1 10/7/2019 1 0 N 80 Dairy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273360018 Lane 0 2/20/2019 270442009 65 Donald SFD O 0 1 3/14/2019 1 0 N 271052010 5 Altamount SFD O 0 1 3/20/2019 1 0 N 273370005 18 Wild Lilac SFD O 0 1 6/20/2019 1 0 N 273370006 20 Wild Lilac SFD O 0 1 6/20/2019 1 0 N 273380001 53 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 1 6/20/2019 1 0 N 273380002 55 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 1 6/20/2019 1 0 N 273370001 8 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 0 1 7/11/2019 1 0 N 273370002 10 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 0 1 7/11/2019 1 0 N 273370003 12 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 0 1 7/11/2019 1 0 N 273370004 16 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 0 1 7/11/2019 1 0 N 273380030 28 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 0 1 7/11/2019 1 0 N 273380015 52 Tomcat Way SFD O 0 1 7/11/2019 1 0 N 273380029 26 Wild Lilac Way SFD O 0 1 7/11/2019 1 0 N 273300010 25 Bigleaf Road SFD O 0 1 10/29/2019 1 0 N 25 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 1 1 0 N 273320012 0 3/22/2019 10 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 1 1 0 N 273330014 0 5/7/2019 273300014 33 Bigleaf Road SFD O 0 1 5/13/2019 1 0 N 266250041 105 Melody Lane SFD O 0 1 5/23/2019 1 0 N 58 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340015 way 0 3/13/2019 55 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340020 Way 0 3/13/2019 57 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340021 Way 0 3/13/2019 56 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340016 Way 0 3/29/2019 53 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340019 Way 0 5/2/2019 59 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340022 Way 0 5/2/2019 52 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340017 Way 0 5/2/2019 51 Windy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273340018 Way 0 7/22/2019 269052001 47 Orchard Road SFD O 0 1 5/22/2019 1 0 N 268410014 31 Meadow View SFD O 0 1 11/15/2019 1 0 N 262181004 15 Dias Dorados SFD O 0 1 5/10/2019 1 0 N 83 Dairy Creek SFD O 1 1 0 N 273360008 Lane 0 6/13/2019 12 Paintbrush Lane SFD O 1 1 0 N 273330013 0 8/9/2019 262023029 54 Linda Vista ADU O 0 1 9/9/2019 1 0 N 266250013 119 Melody Lane ADU O 0 1 1/7/2019 1 0 N 270442009 65 Donald Drive ADU O 0 1 3/14/2019 1 0 N 0 0 0 266081006 123 Van Ripper ADU O 1 1 0 N Lane 0 6/6/2019 268290018 222 Overhill ADU O 0 1 11/26/2019 1 0 N 269061002 209 Moraga Way ADU O 0 1 8/27/2019 1 0 N 124

Housing without Financial Term of Affordability Assistance or Deed Demolished/Destroyed Units Notes or Deed Restriction Restrictions 18 19 20 21

For units affordable without financial assistance or deed Term of Affordability or Demolished/Des restrictions, explain how the Number of Deed Restriction (years) Demolished or troyed Units locality determined the units Demolished/Dest Notes+ (if affordable in perpetuity Destroyed Units+ Owner or were affordable royed Units+ enter 1000)+ Renter+ (see instructions)

4 0 0

1 Demolished O

1 Demolished O 125

This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past Jurisdiction Orinda ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT year information comes from previous APRs. Reporting Year 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here (CCR Title 25 §6202)

Table B Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress Permitted Units Issued by Affordability 1 2 3 4

RHNA Allocation Total Units to Total Remaining Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 RHNA by Income by Income Level Date (all years) Level

Deed Restricted 84 84 Very Low Non-Deed Restricted Deed Restricted 47 47 Low Non-Deed Restricted Deed Restricted 54 20 34 Moderate Non-Deed Restricted 2 7 4 7 Above Moderate 42 44 53 37 51 33 218 Total RHNA 227 Total Units 44 55 44 55 40 238 165 Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas 126

Jurisdiction Orinda ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas (CCR Title 25 §6202) Table C Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need

Project Identifier Date of Rezone RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Type of Shortfall Sites Description

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Local Above Moderate- Type of Shortfall Parcel Size General Plan Minimum Maximum Realistic Description of Existing APN Street Address Project Name+ Jurisdiction Date of Rezone Very Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Zoning Vacant/Nonvacant Income (Acres) Designation Density Allowed Density Allowed Capacity Uses Tracking ID+ Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 127 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title 25 §6202) Jurisdiction Orinda Reporting Year 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Table D Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

1 2 3 4 Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation

Facilitate the production of at least 42 new single-family homes (suitable for moderate- and above moderate income households) between 2014 and 2022 (RHNA period). Facilitate completion of 8 units of owner- ACTION 1.A: ORINDA GROVE occupied housing affordable to moderate DEVELOPMENT Building permits for 41 units at Orinda Grove were issued in 2013 income households on the former Pine Grove Facilitate redevelopment/reuse of the former and permits for the remaining 32 units were issued in 2014. The School site. Provide for a diversity of housing Pine Grove School as a mixed-income below market rate program for the development was established and types to meet current and future needs of all 2014-2015 residential development including 8 moderate- the application process for affordable units was completed. By the residents without compromising the semi- income housing units and 65 market-rate end of 2015, all units were constructed and final building inspections rural character of Orinda's single-family housing units. had been conducted. neighborhoods. Encourage planned unit developments, which allow variations from development standards provided that the overall density of the site remainsconsistent with the General Plan.

Facilitate completion of 66 units of 2014 housing for very low- and extremely low- income seniors at the Monteverde Senior ACTION 1.B: MONTEVERDE SENIOR Apartments Project. Provide for a diversity of APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT housing types to meet current and future Facilitate continued development and needs of all residents without compromising construction of the Monteverde Senior the semi-rural character of Orinda's single- Apartments development on the former family neighborhoods. Participate in those Construction was completed in November 2014 and the development 12/31/2014 Orinda Library site. This development will housing assistance programs that are most was fully occupied in December 2014. produce 66 units of housing for very low- and appropriate to Orinda's setting and extremely low-income seniors at a density of demographcis, with an amphasis on programs 48 units per acre and is anticipated to be that benefit local seniors and those who live completed in December 2014. or work in Orinda. Continue to provide density bonusesfor housing that includes dedicated affordable untis or units set aside for seniors, consistent with state law.

ACTION 1.C: PROMOTION OF SECOND UNITS Continue to implement a public information and outreach campaign via the City’s website and the Orinda City newsletter to inform property owners of the standards for second unit development and the importance of second units to Orinda. Provide information to encourage residents to apply for second units, Building permits for three second units were issued in 2015, particularly where their homes already include two in 2016, seven were issued in 2017, four in 2018, and six in 2019. space that is configured for a conforming Applicants at the Planning Department counter are informed of the second unit (e.g., carriage houses, au pair second unit standards and, as appropriate, encouraged to consider quarters, second kitchens on floors with Promote the public education about second including a second unit in their development proposals. As of separate entrances). The City will produce a units, including letting residents know about Ongoing January 1, 2020, state law overrides local ordinances and requires flyer regarding second units and provide the the benefits at the Planning Counter in local jurisdictions to ministerially approve certain second units, also flyer at the Planning Department counter and to coversations. known as "accessory dwelling units" (ADUs) if units meet a set of project applicants for all discretionary land use minimum standards. Since this new law went into effect, there has applications. On been an increase in resident interest in construction of ADUs and average, a total of 93 discretionary land use multiple plans have been submitted to the Planning Department. applications, mainly for residential development projects, are considered annually by the Planning Department. Many of the projects are on property that could support the development of a second unit. In addition, the City will publish at least annually informational materials pertaining to second units through a combination of media including the City’s website and direct mailings.

Promote the registration and legalization of existing second units in the city that meet current zoning and building safety standards, including those which are in active ACTION 1.D: LEGALIZATION OF EXISTING use as rental housing and those with the See statement above regarding Action 1C. One building permit was UNREGISTERED SECOND UNITS potential to be used as rental units. Facilitate issued in 2018 for the legalization of an existing second unit that was Notify property owners that under the revised development of 57 second units between 2014 Ongoing entitled and reported in 2017. With new state laws that went into second dwelling unit standards, formerly and 2022. Based on prevailing market rents effect on January 1, 2020, we expect to see more legalization of illegal second units may possibly now meet (and the analysis in Chapter 4 of this element), unregistered second units. the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. it is presumed that 2 of these units will be affordable to very low-income households, 13 to low-income households, and 38 to moderate-income households.

Encourage the incluson of second units in new single-family homes, and support the creation of such units in existing single-family homes, subject to design criteria of the Zoning ACTION 1.E: SECOND UNITS IN WILDER Ordinance and building code standards as See statement above regarding Action 1C. To date, approvals have (GATEWAY VALLEY) well as neighborhood compatibility been granted for 7 second units in the Wilder subdivision. The Encourage builders in the Wilder development considerations. Facilitate development of 57 Planning Department staff continue to inform Wilder developers of Ongoing to include second units in new homes or to second units between 2014 and 2022. Based this Housing Element objective, and many of the approved plans have incorporate space with the flexibility for on prevailing market rents (and analysis in an option of including or converting square footage to second units. second unit conversions in the future. Chapter 4 of this element), it is presumed that One such project was approved in 2018. None were approved in 2019. 2 of these units will be affordable to very low- income households, 13 to low-income households, 38 to moderate-income households.

ACTION 1.F: AFFORDABLE HOUSING Participate in those housing assistance Through the City’s affordable housing program, 66 units restricted to INCENTIVE PROGRAM programs that are most appropriate to extremely low- and very low-income households were developed at a Continue to implement the City’s affordable Orinda's setting and demographcis, density greater than allowed without the program for the housing incentive program (density bonus with an amphasis on programs that benefit Monteverde Senior Housing project. Without the program ordinance), which grants up to a 35 percent local seniors and those who live or work in Ongoing approximately 55 units would have been allowed on the project site. increase in the number of permitted units for Orinda. The development was competed in November 2014 and fully developments which set aside 20 percent or Facilitate completion of 66 units of housing for occupied in December 2014. The City will continue to implement the more of their units as affordable, as defined very low- and extremely low-income seniors at Affordable Housing Incentive Program. The City will continue to by state law. the Monteverde Senior Apartments Project. meet with interested housing developers on an ongoing basis. The City worked successfully with Eden Housing to develop 66 units Participate in those housing assistance 128 ACTION 1.G: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO affordable to extremely low- and very low-income senior households programs that are most appropriate to ORGANIZATIONS THAT CAN DEVELOP at the Monteverde Senior Housing project. The project includes one Orinda's setting and demographcis, OR PRESERVE LOWER-COST HOUSING manger’s unit affordable at the moderate income level. The City will with an amphasis on programs that benefit Provide outreach and assistance to nonprofit continue to meet with interested housing developers on an ongoing local seniors and those who live or work in Ongoing organizations and builders whose expertise basis. When applications for affordable units or mixed-income Orinda. can inure to the benefit of low- and moderate- housing developments are received, the City will proactively work Facilitate completion of 66 units of housing for income Orinda residents, particularly with the applicants to address issues of concern, such as parking, very low- and extremely low-income seniors at seniors and those with special needs. traffic and design, and will continue to explore ways to reduce the the Monteverde Senior Apartments Project. cost of developing such housing in Orinda on a case-by-case basis.

ACTION 2.A: ASSISTANCE TO LOWER- Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing The City continues to participate in Contra Costa County's housing INCOME SENIOR HOMEOWNERS stock by private property owners. Encourage rehabilitation program. Due to limited time and resources, the City Participate in Contra Costa County’s housing 10 existing very low-income Orinda did not take additional steps to advertise the program's availability rehabilitation program, and publicize the Ongoing households to participate in the during the planning period. The City will begin coordinating with availability of the County’s low interest loan County’s major rehabilitation loan County staff and advertise the program in the city newsletter at least programs for lower-income seniors and program. annually, and will post information/links to the City's website. other households.

Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing stock by private property owners. Encourage the preservation of existing affordable The City continues to participate in Contra Costa County's First Time ACTION 2.B: PARTICIPATION IN FIRST-TIME housing in the city, including the Orinda Home Buyer and Mortgage Credit Certificate programs. Due to limited HOMEBUYER AND MCC PROGRAMS Senior Village, and existing second units and time and resources, the City did not take additional steps to advertise Participate in the County’s First-Time 2015 rental apartments. Conserve Orinda's existing the program's availability during the planning period. As noted in the Homebuyer and Mortgage Credit Certificate supply of smaller and more affordable single- Housing Element, the City will coorindate with County staff on (MCC) programs. family homes, including older two- and three- implementing this program more proactively. bedroom homes on lots smaller than 10,000 square feet.

ACTION 2.C: HOME MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROGRAMS Advertise the availability of existing home Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing maintenance, repair, and improvement stock by private property owners. Preserve The City participates in Contra Costa County's Neighborhood programs such as the low- and zero-interest 100 percent of the existing multi-family rental 2015 Preservation Program. Due to limited time and resources, the City loans offered through Contra Costa County’s units in the city through 2023. Preserve 100 (advertising) did not take additional steps to advertise the program's availability Neighborhood Preservation Program. percent of the existing housing in the city's and 2017 during the planning period. As noted in the Housing Element, the City Consider applying for additional grant funding nonresidential zoning districts through 2023. (funding) will coorindate with County staff on implementing this program more to assist homeowners with addressing ADA Encrourage 10 existing very low-income proactively. accessibility modifications to their homes. Orinda households to participate in the Conduct code enforcement on a complaint- County's major rehabiltiation loan program. driven basis to address safety and code compliance issues.

ACTION 2.D: SECOND UNIT RENT DATA Encourage the preservation of existing The City collected and monitored data periodically on second unit Continue to collect and monitor data on Ongoing affordable housing in the city, rents using online rental forums such as Craigslist. As noted in the second unit rents to better understand their including Ongoing Housing Element, the City will create a survey on second units which role in the Orinda housing market and the the Orinda Senior Village, and existing second will be updated annually by the Planning Department. income groups they serve. units and rental apartments.

Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing ACTION 2.E: FLOOR AREA RATIO LIMITS stock by private property owners. Conserve Planning Staff continues to successfully implement this program Maintain a sliding scale for calculating floor Orinda's existing supply of smaller and more Ongoing through the structure size limitations of the City’s Zoning Code area ratios (FAR) as a way to preserve the affordable single-family homes, including (Orinda Municipal Code Section 17.6.8). city’s existing stock of smaller homes. older two- and three-bedroom homes on lots smaller than 10,000 square feet.

ACTION 2.F: DESIGN AWARDS AND Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing RECOGNITION stock by private property owners. Conserve In 2016, a Mayor's Award was presented for Eden Housing's Develop a new category in the Mayor’s Orinda's existing supply of smaller and more 2015 Monteverde Senior Housing project, which included 66 multifamily Awards for Architectural Excellence for small affordable single-family homes, including units. homes or modifications to existing small older two- and three-bedroom homes on lots homes. smaller than 10,000 square feet.

ACTION 2.H: TITLE 24 ADMINISTRATION Implemented by Building Inspection Department staff through the Continue to enforce residential energy Encourage reinvestment in the city's housing application of the building codes. The 2019 Building Code took effect Ongoing conservation requirements as set forth in Title stock by private property owners. on January 1, 2020 and presents more challenging energy savings 24, California Administrative Code. targets compared to the 2016 Building Code. The City continues to allow residential units above commercial uses Continue to allow multi-family ACTION 3.A: DOWNTOWN that are part of a mixed use development with a general use permit residential uses above the ground floor within Study the feasibility of mixed-use development 2018 per Orinda Municipal Code Sections 17.8.4 and 17.31. In 2020, Orinda Orinda’s Downtown Commercial zoning at appropriate densities. has started a Downtown Precise Plan that will explore the idea of district. increasing density in the Downtown Commercial Zone.

ACTION 3.B: ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN Construction of 66 units of housing for very low- and extremely low- Meet annually with at least one STANDARDS TO IMPROVE income seniors at the Monteverde Senior Apartments Project was affordable housing developer or AFFORDABILITY completed in December 2014. This project made use of the City's representative of an affordable housing Implement the City’s Affordable Housing Affordable Housing Incentive Program to build at a higher density advocacy group to discuss housing issues, Incentive Program to reduce production costs than usually allowed by code. The City will continue to meet with needs and opportunities in Orinda. in projects containing affordable units such as 2015 interested housing developers on an ongoing basis. When Encourage larger-scale residential adjusting design standards on a case-by-case applications for affordable units or mixed-income housing developments to include a mix of unit types, basis, which could include adjusting standards developments are received, the City will proactively work with the including smaller units and units that are for setbacks, lot coverage, street width, unit applicants to address issues of concern, such as parking, traffic and affordable to lower- and moderate-income size, and parking, for all affordable housing design, and will continue to explore ways to reduce the cost of households. projects. developing such housing in Orinda on a case-by-case basis.

Encourage the sharing of housing units by ACTION 3.C: SHARED HOUSING PROGRAM homeowners seeking to age in place or Consider participating in ECHO housing’s Due to limited time and staff resources since approval of the supplement their income. Shared housing can “Shared Housing” or some similar program as Housing Element in 2015, the city did not take action to pursue a provide an important resource for seniors, 2016 a way to improve housing opportunities for partnership with ECHO or other similar program to establish a shared young adults, and others in the community lower-income seniors and extremely low- senior housing program in Orinda during the calendar year. who cannot afford their own home or income Orinda residents. apartment.

ACTION 3.D: NO NET LOSS OF HOUSING CAPACITY Develop and implement an evaluation procedure to ensure the City maintains sufficient land to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation throughout the planning period. Because Orinda has a limited number of sites on which it can meet its Orinda has a limited number of sites on which it can meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation for low- Maintain an adequate number and Regional Housing Needs Allocation durign the planning period. and very low-income households during the variety of sites to meet the City’s Ongoing Therefore, the Planning Department monitors the existing sites planning period, it is important that the Regional Housing Needs Allocation. identified in the Housing Element as zoning changes are proposed availability of these sites be monitored. and/or as development is proposed on multi-family housing sites. Section 65863 of the California Government Code stipulates that a community may not reduce the allowable density on a housing site if the result is that the city is no longer able to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation. The City will comply with Government Code 65863. 129 ACTION 3.E: HOUSING SITE(S) As a part of the 5th Cycle Housing Element, the City considered anew whether to rely on the 3.2 acre Santa Maria site to help meet the City’s RHNA for lower income households. The City selected the Santa Maria site in EIR Alternative 1 to zone at up to 20 dwelling units per acre (the “default density” under State law) Maintain an adequate number and in order to accommodate 48 units of the City’s variety of sites to meet the City’s Within 2 allocation of lower income households. Regional Housing Needs Allocation. Meet years of On March 15, 2016, the Orinda City council approved revisions to Through this Action, the City will initiate and Orinda's Regional Housing Needs Allocation Adoption of the use permit process in the RM District consistent with Action 3E of process an amendment of the development mandates through a Housing the Housing Element. policies (i.e., general plan, zoning and/or combination of second units and Element zoning map) applicable on the selected site to rezoning of adequate land area at the default replace the existing High Density Overlay density. District on the site with policies to accommodate a total of 48 units at up to 20 dwelling units per acre (the “default density” under State law). This will be a public process. The precise wording of the development policies and configuration of the area covered will be determined through that public process.

Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and approval processes do not unduly constrain or delay ACTION 4.A: REVISE THE USE PERMIT Within 1 year the construction of housing. City procedures On March 15, 2016, the Orinda City council approved revisions to REQUIREMENTS of adoption should be the use permit process in the RM District consistent with Action 3E of Revise the use permit process in the of Housing consistent with Permit Streamlining Act the Housing Element. Residential Medium-Density (RM) District. Element requirements and should not include unreasonable fees or regulations.

Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and approval processes do not unduly constrain or delay the construction of housing. City procedures should be consistent with Permit Streamlining Act requirements and should not include ACTION 4.B: REDUCTION OF PERMITTING unreasonable fees or regulations. Make a COSTS AND DELAYS "completeness" determination for planning Planning Staff continues to be responsive to applicants and Explore the feasibility of expanding the City’s applications within two weeks or less for 80 successfully make completeness determinations ahead of the 30- Affordable Housing Incentive Program to percent of all applications received, rather Ongoing day completeness deadline. Development impact fee waivers are add provisions for reductions in application than available for affordable housing projects. processing costs for multi-family projects waiting the full 30 days allowed by the Permit containing affordable units. Streamlining Act. Provide at least one workshop or training seminar a year to assist owners, builders, contractors, and others with understanding Orinda's development process and requirements.

ACTION 4.C: SHARED PARKING Consider flexibility in development REGULATIONS standards, such as reduced parking Exceptions to the parking regulations are considered on a case-by- Consider adopting shared parking regulations requirements for senior housing, in order to 2016 case basis. Consideration of a shared parking program is pending. where it can be demonstrated that there will accommodate additional affordable units and be no parking shortages. reduce housing costs.

ACTION 4.D: BUILDING CODE UPDATES Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and approval Latest building code and local amendments adopted in January Continue to implement the California Building processes do not unduly constrain or delay 2020. Revised small-scale solar PV streamlining requirements Code of Regulations as locally amended. Ongoing the construction of adopted in 2015. The building code is administered by the Contra Update or amend the codes as state housing. Costa County Building Department. requirements change.

ACTION 4.E: FEE UPDATES Periodically review planning and building fees Ensure that Orinda’s permitting and approval The Planning Department's fees are updated annually to reflect to ensure they cover required costs but are processes do not unduly constrain or delay Annually actual processing costs. The 2021 fiscal year fee schedule will take not more than is necessary to provide the the construction of housing. effect July, 2020. required City services.

Continue to promote equal housing opportunity for all Orinda residents and others seeking housing in the city, regardless of race, religion, marital/family status, ethnic This policy remains active. There were no fair housing complaints in ACTION 5.A: FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM background, or other arbitrary factors. 2019. The City periodically includes housing inforamtion in a Distribute information regarding fair housing Support programs that educate and inform Ongoing quarterly newsletter. Articles regarding affordable homeownership issues in the City’s quarterly newsletter, at residents about fair housing laws, the opportunities at Orinda Grove and the status of the Monteverde the Orinda Library, and at City offices. Regional Housing Needs Senior Apartments project were included in past newsletters. Allocation process, and the City's obligations under state housing law. Follow up on 100 percent of all fair housing complaints received by the City.

ACTION 5.B: LOCAL PREFERENCE IN Support programs that educate and inform HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES residents about fair housing laws, the The local preference program provisions were incorporated into the Continue measures to ensure that persons Regional Housing Needs Allocation process, Ongoing established below market rate program for the Orinda Grove project. who work in Orinda receive preference in the and the City's obligations under state housing This action will be continued for other development projects. occupancy of new affordable for-sale housing law. units.

ACTION 5.C: ASSISTANCE FOR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES. Encourage the development of Support the construction and rehabilitation of housing designed to meet the unique needs of housing to meet the needs of Orinda seniors and persons with disabilities. The City Several of the units in the Monteverde project included universal residents with developmental disabilities, endorses the concept of universal design, Ongoing design features to accommodate the unique needs to seniors and including small group homes and units in wherein all new construction and renovations persons with disabiltiies. This action will be continued. affordable housing developments that are are designed to recognize the varying levels of designed for developmentally disabled mobility in the population. persons. 130

Jurisdiction Orinda ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Cells in grey contain auto-calculation Reporting Period 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation formulas (CCR Title 25 §6202)

Table E Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7

Description of Commercial Commercial Development Bonus Project Identifier Units Constructed as Part of Agreement Development Bonus Date Approved

1 2 3 4

Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 131

Jurisdiction Orinda ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas (CCR Title 25 §6202) Table F Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(2)

Units that Count Towards RHNA + Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+ Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be Listed for Informational Purposes Only counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you to populate these fields. The description should adequately document how each Activity Type unit complies with subsection (c)(7) of Government Code Section 65583.1+

Extremely Low- Extremely Low- Very Low- Income+ Very Low-Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Income+ Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+

Rehabilitation Activity

Preservation of Units At-Risk

Acquisition of Units

Total Units by Income 132

NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites Jurisdiction Orinda inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting Note: "+" indicates an optional field jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Cells in grey contain auto-calculation Reporting Period 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) during the reporting year. formulas ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title 25 §6202)

Table G Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of

Project Identifier

1 4

Realistic Capacity Local Jurisdiction Entity to whom the site APN Street Address Project Name+ Identified in the Intended Use for Site Tracking ID+ transferred Housing Element

Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 133

Jurisdiction Orinda Reporting Year 2019 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)

Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level Current Year Deed Restricted 0 Very Low Non-Deed Restricted 0 Deed Restricted 0 Low Non-Deed Restricted 0 Deed Restricted 0 Moderate Non-Deed Restricted 7

Above Moderate 33

Total Units 40 Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low- income permitted units totals

Housing Applications Summary Total Housing Applications Submitted: 38 Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received: 38 Total Housing Units Approved: 38 Total Housing Units Disapproved: 0

Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions Number of Applications for Streamlining 0 Number of Streamlining Applications Approved 0 Total Developments Approved with Streamlining 0 Total Units Constructed with Streamlining 0

Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits Income Rental Ownership Total Very Low 0 0 0 Low 0 0 0 Moderate 0 0 0 Above Moderate 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0

Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas 134

Supplementary Information – Attachments

3.c Ordinances for walking, biking and transit access 135 15.32.230 ‐ Path or sidewalk in single‐family and multifamily land use districts.

A. The City Engineer shall require dedication and construction of a path or sidewalk in a single-family or multifamily land use district when: 1. A path or sidewalk is consistent with the city master list of trails, pedestrian and bicycle paths formulated as required by the general plan; or 2. A path or trail is necessary to afford safe pedestrian access to a bus stop or other public facility. B. As a condition to issuance of a building permit for new development in the vicinity of a school serving grades kindergarten through 12, the City Engineer shall require dedication and construction of a path or sidewalk along the street or road abutting the property. C. When required to dedicate and construct a path or sidewalk, an applicant shall provide the path or sidewalk on at least one side of the street or road abutting the property.

(Prior code § 4-127)

15.32.240 ‐ Path or sidewalk in commercial land use district.

The City Engineer shall require dedication and construction of a path or sidewalk along at least one side of each street abutting the property in a commercial land use district.

(Prior code § 4-128)

15.32.250 ‐ Guidelines for path construction.

To the extent feasible, the City Engineer shall follow the following guidelines when requiring the dedication and construction of a path or sidewalk: A. The path or sidewalk shall not be built contiguous to the street or road; B. The path or sidewalk shall connect to another off-site sidewalk or path; C. Each path and sidewalk shall meander; D. A path or sidewalk need not follow the roadway alignment.

(Prior code § 4-129)

15.32.260 ‐ Use of pedestrian and bike paths.

The City Engineer shall require that a pedestrian and bike path be left unobstructed for use by pedestrian and bike travel.

(Prior code § 4-130)

Chapter 16.40 ‐ SIDEWALKS AND PATHS

Sections:

16.40.010 ‐ Paths.

A. Along Rear or Side Line of Lots. Where paths are established along the rear or side lines of lots, the path shall be entirely within the lot and contiguous to the rear line or side line of the lot, and the path shall be shown in dashed lines.

Page 1 136 B. Easements. Easements not less than six feet wide shall be provided for pedestrian paths when required for the public convenience. C. Surfacing. Pedestrian paths shall be surfaced with the same material of the same thickness specified below for sidewalks and for a width of at least five feet.

(CCCC§§ 96-8.202 — 96-8.206)

16.40.020 ‐ Sidewalks—Locations.

Portland cement concrete sidewalks shall be provided at the following locations within the subdivision: A. Along all thoroughfares; B. Along all arterials, collector and minor streets which serve as direct access to schools within one mile of an existing school or school site approved by the local school board. The one-mile distance shall be measured along the shortest pedestrian route available or planned, measured from the closest boundary of the school site and subdivision; C. Along all street wherein the area is zoned R-12 or in land use district having a higher density; D. Along all street within any portion of a subdivision zoned for multiple-family, business or commercial land uses.

(CCCC§ 96-8.402)

16.40.030 ‐ Sidewalks—Width and thickness.

Sidewalks shall be at least four feet wide, exclusive of curbs, and not less than three and five-eighths inches thick.

(CCCC§ 96-8.404)

16.40.040 ‐ Sidewalks—Obstruction restriction.

Sidewalks less than six feet in width shall not be obstructed by utility installations, mailboxes or by planting.

(CCCC§ 96-8.406)

16.40.050 ‐ Relationship to curbs.

Sidewalks adjacent to curbs shall be monolithic with curb if curbs did not exist prior to commencement of work included under the subdivision agreement. Sidewalks shall be adjacent to curbs unless the conditions of approval of the tentative map provide otherwise.

(CCCC§ 96-8.408)

16.40.060 ‐ Relationship to right‐of‐way.

Sidewalks shall be fully within the street right-of-way.

(CCCC§ 96-8.410)

Page 2 137

Supplementary Information – Attachments

6 CIP, 7‐21‐2020, abridged for Transportation projects 138

CITY OF ORINDA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

FISCAL YEARS 2019/2020 – 2023/2024

Adopted July 21, 2020

Before

After

Miner Rd. Pavement Rehabilitation Project 139

CITY of ORINDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FISCAL YEARS 19/20 – 23/24

Adopted: July 21, 2020

ELECTED OFFICIALS DARLENE GEE, Mayor AMY WORTH, Vice Mayor INGA MILLER, Councilmember DENNIS FAY, Councilmember NICK KOSLA, Councilmember

STEVE SALOMON, City Manager

Prepared By Scott Christie, Senior Engineer

With the CooperationI , nput, and Assistance of the Following Staff: PAUL RANKIN, Finance Director TODD TRIMBLE, Parks & Recreation Director LARRY THEIS, Public Works & Engineering Services Director DRUMMOND BUCKLEY, Planning Director JASON CHEN, City Engineer 140 CITY OF ORINDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY2020‐FY2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

Executive Summary ...... 1 Projects and Expenditures by Category ...... 2 Overview ...... 4

II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

City Buildings & Facilities City Hall Water Leak (1710) ...... 12 Community Center Window Replacement (4016) ...... 13 Sewer Line Community Center (4017) ...... 14 Community Center HVAC (4050) ...... 15 Community Center Accessibility Improvements (4086) ...... 16 City Hall Slide Stabilization (4108) ...... 17 Art & Garden Center Sound Absorption (4113) ...... 18 Community Center Roof Replacement (4141) ...... 19 Library Boiler Piping Replacement (4144) ...... 20 City Hall Elevator (4145) ...... 21 Fire Sprinkler Compliance & Repair (4156) ...... 22 Library Fountain – Replace Pump & Filter (4157) ...... 23 Mini Split HVAC System at Orinda Library (4160) ...... 24 Library Boiler Replacement (4161) ...... 25 Solar Back‐Up Community Center (4164) ...... 26 Library Roof Replacement (4173) ...... 27 Replace Library Air Handlers (4174) ...... 28 Library Painting, Exterior & Interior (4175) ...... 29

Long Term Planning Downtown Orinda Streetscape Master Plan (4130) ...... 30 Downtown Precise Plan (4163) ...... 31 141 CITY OF ORINDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY2020‐FY2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Park Improvements Wilder Fields 1 & 2 Turf Replacement (4013) ...... 32 Fencing & Gate Wilder Field 4 (4018) ...... 33 Resurface Community Park Tennis Courts (4052) ...... 34 Wilder Fields 4 Synthetic Turf (4061) ...... 35 St. Stephens Trail & Drainage Improvements (4068) ...... 36 Mini Park ‐Crossroads Park (4103) ...... 37 Community Park Renovation Plan & Improvements (4112) ...... 38 Community Park Pathway Improvements (4142) ...... 39

Transportation/Drainage Downtown & BART Wayfinding (0023) ...... 40 Miner Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit (0044)...... 41 El Toyonal EVA Bridge Rehabilitation (0067) ...... 42 Bear Creek Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit (0087) ...... 43 Miner Rd. Pavement Rehab & Shoulder Widening (4071) ...... 44 ADA Transition Plan Compliance, Roadway (4074) ...... 45 Storm Drain Plan & Inventory (4092) ...... 46 Storm Drain Liner, Ivy Dr. 48” (4094) ...... 47 Traffic Calming Improvements Program (4107)...... 48 Annual Bicycle, Trails and Walkways Program (4109) ...... 49 Annual Drainage Facilities Improvements Program (4111) ...... 50 2018 Measure J & L Pavement Rehabilitation (4118/4132) ...... 51 2019 Measure J & L Pavement Rehabilitation (4119/4120) ...... 52 Camino Pablo Bicycle Route Corridor Improvements (4128) ...... 53 Glorietta Elementary Safe Route to School (4131) ...... 54 Moraga Way Crosswalk at Brookside Road (4137) ...... 55 Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation. (4138) ...... 56 Martha Rd.‐Catherine Ct. Ped. Path (4140) ...... 57 Green Infrastructure Program for Pavement Projects (4146) ...... 58 142 CITY OF ORINDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY2020‐FY2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lavenida Culvert Repair (4148) ...... 59 2020 Annual Pavement Project (4150) ...... 60 Brookwood Culvert Repair (4151)...... 61 Camino Sobrante at Golf Course Slide Stabilization (4152) ...... 62 Loma Vista Pavement Repair (4153) ...... 63 2021 Annual Pavement Project (4155) ...... 64 2020 Stormdrain Improvement (4162) ...... 65 Pavement Rehab – El Toyonal, Oak Flat & La Espiral (4165) ...... 66 2022 Annual Pavement Project (4166) ...... 67 Storm Drain Moraga Way & Coral (4167) ...... 68 Ped Path Moraga Way, El Camino Moraga to Altamount (4168) ...... 69 Crosswalk, Orindawoods at Kite Hill Rd. (4169) ...... 70 Drainage Improvement at 25 La Cuesta (4170) ...... 71

2023 Annual Pavement Project (4171) ...... 72 Ped Xing Improvement Glorietta at Virginia (4172) ...... 73 Washington Ln. Widening Study (4172) ...... 74

Vehicles Fleet Replacements (0020) ...... 75

Unfunded Project List ...... 76

Bicycle, Trails & Walkways Plan ‐ Project Lists ...... 82

III. FINANCIAL SUMMARY

CIP Summary – Sources and Uses of Funds ...... 87

IV. APPENDICES

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 20‐01 ...... 110 143 CITY OF ORINDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY2020‐FY2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 41‐20 ...... 111

Fund Sources‐ Descriptions ...... 112

ACRONYMS ...... 114

GLOSSARY ...... 115 144

Executive Summary

The Public Works & Engineering Services Department annually updates the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to identify the infrastructure needs for roadways, drainage systems, parks, and community facilities. The CIP establishes the project priorities within the City and allocates funding resources to complete the planned work. (Note that some of the “projects” included in the CIP are not infrastructure, such as Long Term Planning and Fleet Replacements; these amount to less than 4% of the expenditures, and are included for convenience.) The CIP for Fiscal Years 2020 through 2024 includes expected expenditures for the current fiscal year 19/20 (July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020) and budgets/forecasts a four-year plan of future expenditures through June 30, 2024. This CIP allocates $ 16 million for 44 funded projects/programs for FY20/21. The majority of expenditures are for Transportation/Drainage projects, estimated at $11.5 million or approximately 74% of the FY20/21 CIP expenditures. (Note that these amounts include “Other uses” as denoted in the “Sources and Uses of Funds” summaries in the Financial Summary section. “Other uses” include portions of Staff costs for project management and engineering, and amount to 3% or less of annual expenditures.) The overall five-year CIP (FY 19/20 through FY 23/24) allocates $47 million to fund 64 capital improvements, significant maintenance capital outlay expenditures and non-capital type “projects” to accommodate restricted funding source reporting and monitoring requirements.

The anticipated projects are distributed by the improvement category. The City has been financially committed to its #1 priority of rehabilitating the pavement condition of the worst residential roadways, and this goal has been met. The 2019 Pavement Rehabilitation project is nearing final completion (having been delayed in part due to the coronavirus pandemic) rehabilitates or slurry seals 140 separate street segments for a total estimated cost of $13 million. The 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation project will be a smaller size (approximately $5 million), as the City has substantially completed the rehabilitation of its residential roads, which was largely funded from the 2016 Measure L $25 million bond. 145 City of Orinda, California Capital Improvement Plan

'19/'20thru '23/'24

PROJECTS BY CATEGORY

Category Project # '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total

CITY BUILDINGS & FACILITIES

City Hall Water Leak 1710 80,000 80,000 Community Center Window Replacement 4016 85,000 85,000 Sewer Line Community Center 4017 50,000 50,000 Community Center HVAC 4050 50,000 50,000 Community Center Accessibility Improvements 4086 10,000 100,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 185,000 City Hall Slide Stabilization 4108 5,000 640,000 245,000 890,000 Art and Garden Center Sound Absorption 4113 25,000 15,000 40,000 Community Center Roof Replacement 4141 275,000 275,000 Library Boiler Piping Replacement 4144 109,368 109,368 City Hall Elevator 4145 20,000 20,000 Fire Sprinkler Compliance and Repair 4156 9,145 9,145 Replace Pump and Filter for Library Fountain 4157 4,683 4,683 Install Mini Split HVAC System at Orinda Library 4160 30,000 30,000 Library Boiler Replacement 4161 75,000 75,000 Solar Back-Up Community Center 4164 317,551 317,551 Library Roof Replacement 4173 85,000 85,000 Replace Library Air Handlers 4174 190,000 190,000 Library Painting (Ext. & Interior) 4175 60,000 60,000

CITY BUILDINGS & FACILITIES Total 243,196 1,657,551 545,000 85,000 25,000 2,555,747

LONG TERM PLANNING

Downtown Orinda Streetscape Master Plan 4130 50,355 50,355 Downtown Precise Plan 4163 20,000 430,860 54,000 504,860

LONG TERM PLANNING Total 70,355 430,860 54,000 555,215

PARK IMPROVEMENTS

Wilder Fields 1&2 Turf Replacement 4013 1,000,000 1,000,000 Fencing & Gate Wilder Field 4 4018 37,000 37,000 Resurface Community Park Tennis Courts 4052 17,450 192,500 209,950 Wilder Park Field#4 Synthetic Turf 4061 225,000 225,000 St. Stephens Trail and Drainage Improvements 4068 15,000 65,000 80,000 Mini Park (Crossroads Park) 4103 10,000 310,000 320,000 Community Park Renovation Plan & Improvements 4112 215,000 675,000 890,000 Community Park Pathway Improvement 4142 24,877 24,877

PARK IMPROVEMENTS Total 52,327 1,979,500 690,000 65,000 2,786,827

TRANSPORTATION / DRAINAGE

Downtown and BART Wayfinding 0023 81,744 81,744 Miner Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0044 150,000 472,000 80,000 702,000 El Toyonal EVA Bridge Rehabilitation 0067 50,002 50,002 Bear Creek Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0087 200,000 925,000 240,000 1,365,000 Miner Rd Pavement Rehab & Shoulder Widening 4071 733,173 733,173 ADA Transition Plan Compliance (Roadway) 4074 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000

2020-2024 CIP Thursday, July 16, 2020 146 Category Project # '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total

Storm Drain Plan & Inventory 4092 66,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 316,000 Storm Drain Liner Ivy Dr (48in) 4094 40,000 130,000 170,000 Traffic Calming Improvements Program 4107 1,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,000 Annual Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways Program 4109 1,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 161,000 Annual Drainage Facilities Improvement Program 4111 137,321 275,000 275,000 275,000 245,000 1,207,321 2018 Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4118/4132 3,320 3,320 2019 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4119/4120 12,010,752 1,120,000 13,130,752 Camino Pablo Bicycle Route Corridor Improvements 4128 110,909 439,091 550,000 Glorietta Elementary Safe Route to School 4131 413,050 413,050 Moraga Way Crosswalk at Brookside Road 4137 65,000 65,000 Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation 4138 10,000 440,000 320,000 770,000 Martha Rd-Catherine Ct Ped Path 4140 1,141 38,860 420,000 460,001 Green Infrastructure Program for Pavement Projects 4146 25,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 Lavenida Culvert Repair 4148 50,000 165,000 215,000 2020 Annual Pavement Project 4150 315,000 6,291,355 6,606,355 Brookwood Culvert Repair 4151 29,150 29,150 Camino Sobrante at Golf Course Slide Stabilization 4152 25,000 55,000 620,000 700,000 Loma Vista Pavement Repair 4153 55,000 245,000 300,000 2021 Annual Pavement Project 4155 195,000 2,805,000 3,000,000 2020 Stormdrain Improvement 4162 205,000 205,000 Pavement Rehab - El Toyonal, Oak Flat, La Espiral 4165 497,000 403,000 900,000 2022 Annual Pavement Project 4166 195,000 3,555,000 3,750,000 Storm Drain Moraga Wy & Coral 4167 93,000 100,000 773,900 966,900 Ped Path MoragaWy ECM to Altam 4168 50,000 200,000 250,000 Crosswalk Orindawoods KiteHill 4169 75,000 75,000 Drainage Impvt 25 La Cuesta 4170 31,500 31,500 2023 Annual Paving Project 4171 195,000 2,805,000 3,000,000 Ped Xing Improvement Glorietta at Virginia 4172 50,000 50,000 Washington Ln. Widening Study 4176 30,000 30,000

TRANSPORTATION / DRAINAGE Total 14,708,562 11,582,806 6,238,000 4,998,900 3,250,000 40,778,268

VEHICLES

Fleet Replacements 0020 79,970 165,000 135,000 115,000 120,000 614,970

VEHICLES Total 79,970 165,000 135,000 115,000 120,000 614,970

GRAND TOTAL 15,154,410 15,815,717 7,662,000 5,263,900 3,395,000 47,291,027

2020-2024 CIP Thursday, July 16, 2020 147

Overview

Introduction The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is an investment plan that supports the quality of life in Orinda by providing for the design and construction of new improvements, and the rehabilitation of existing facilities that benefit the residents of the community. The most prominent City facilities include: City Hall, Community Center/Library, Maintenance Yards, numerous City parks, the extensive public storm drain system, and over 92.7 miles of public roadways. The CIP is updated annually in compliance with California State Statute as a revolving five-year program that is a guide for identifying current and future fiscal allocations. The upcoming fiscal year between July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 (FY20/21) acts as the City’s annual capital budget. The CIP program outlines the City of Orinda’s infrastructure needs/priorities and provides the City with a finance strategy. The purpose of adopting a CIP is to identify and coordinate those capital improvements deemed necessary to accommodate orderly improvements, set policy direction for capital improvements, and ensure capital facilities are provided in a timely manner. This strategic planning document supports the City by seeking to provide benefits to the community in the City’s 35th year of incorporation. Major capital improvements can require several years to strategically plan, design, fund, and finally construct. The program, as a whole, is an effort to coordinate the identification of dependable funding resources with the implementation of projects that respond to current needs and priorities. This CIP also includes a number of maintenance and other non-capital type “projects” to accommodate restricted funding source reporting and monitoring requirements. Due to the current financial climate, the City’s main focus is identifying dependable funding resources for Fiscal Year 20/21 and future years. By correlating the proposed public improvements to the City’s capacity for funding, the CIP helps maximize the funds available and schedules the expenditures

over a period of five years. The program for Fiscal Year20/21 sets forth infrastructure projects. It details the current status of FY19/20 projects and provides information and funding for proposed projects in FY20/21, and future planning through FY23/24. The CIP is divided into four sections: I - Overview II - Capital Improvement Plan Project Descriptions III - Financial Summary IV – Appendices Budgeting Process Projects and programs identified in the CIP originate from many sources. The previous year’s CIP provides the basis for most of the projects into the next CIP. Staff solicits ideas and proposals from other City departments, committees, commissions, and from residents for inclusion in the coming year’s CIP budget. Staff reviews the proposals in conjunction with the estimated revenue and expenditure information provided by the Finance Department. The CIP is prepared in accordance 148

with generally accepted accounting principles. The CIP development process generally starts in the spring with staff developing an initial draft of the CIP to be presented at a public hearing at a City Council Meeting/Workshop to review the proposed changes to the current CIP. The City Council provides feedback to Staff for inclusion in the final draft CIP. The proposed CIP was discussed at the July 7, 2020 City Council meeting. The proposed projects were reviewed for compliance with the Orinda General Plan by the Planning Commission on July 14, 2020. Staff subsequently updated the proposed CIP based on comments and direction by the City Council. The City Council is scheduled to approve this final CIP at its July 21, 2020 meeting.

Revenue/Funding Sources The CIP is funded and financed through a variety of revenues received which include the Measure L – ½ cent sales tax, Measure L-General Obligation Bond, development impact fees, gas tax, Countywide Sales Tax (CCTA Return to Source), grants, and general fund allocations. The total projected revenue in FY20/21 is approximately $7.5 million.

149

The funding sources are generally categorized in the following groups. For further detail of each funding source, please refer to the “Funding Sources” descriptions located at the end of Section III – Financial Summary.

1. General Fund allocations are authorized by the City Council on a case by case basis to the following funds for use by a specific project or program.  Capital Fund  Risk Management Fund  Road/Drainage Stabilization Fund

2. City Specific Revenues are generated by local sales, parcel, or general taxes that are assessed to property owners within Orinda.  Measure L – ½ cent sales tax  Measure L - $25 million General Obligation Bond, special property assessment  Library Fund – parcel tax  Road Maintenance Fee (solid waste provider)  Special Assessment/Benefit Districts  Donations

3. Regional/Outside of City Revenues are funding provided by outside of Orinda agencies allocated to the City based on a funding agreement or state law.  CCTA (Countywide Sales Tax) – Return to Source, Program 28c  Gas Tax/HUTA – recent increase in revenue from State approval of 12 cent tax per gallon increase phased in over three years

4. Development Impact Fees are fees collected to mitigate for specific impacts of development or growth within the community, which include the following:  Drainage Impact Fees  Park Dedication Fees  Transportation Impact Fees

5. Grants are applied for by City Staff and used specifically for the project identified in the application. Generally the City will need to provide a local match portion to the grant funds but it is a valuable outside resource to leverage as little as 10% city funds toward a project.  Federal Grants – FEMA, Surface Transportation Program, Safe Routes to School, Active Transportation Program, Highway Bridge Program, etc.  State Grants – Transportation Development Act, OES PSPS, HCD Development and Parks Proposition 68  Local Grants – Transportation Livable Communities, BART grants, East Bay Regional Park District (Measure WW), projects, etc. 150

The Finance Department provides final estimated fund balances from the previous fiscal year as well as revenue projections for each fund through FY23/24. CIP Project Managers then allocate expenditures by fiscal year for their assigned projects. Many of the CIP projects are funded from restricted funding sources. The restrictions vary, some funds are restricted to a particular development and any improvements within that area, while other funds are limited to a CIP category. Development related funding sources are primarily fees paid by developers to mitigate the impact the development will create and cannot be used for other needs. For example, fees collected for park improvements cannot be used for street improvements and would instead require the return of the fees to the affected developer if not used in the appropriate manner.

The City Council continues to supplement the CIP budget with General Fund allocations (also known as Capital Fund, Risk Management Fund or Road/Drainage Stabilization Fund) to help rehabilitate the City’s infrastructure. For example, in 2017, the City Council authorized funds from the General Fund to the Miner Road Sinkhole project to cover expenses until emergency funding reimbursements are received.

The Financial Summary in Section III provides information on revenues and expenditures for specific projects by fiscal year. Upon completion of a project, any remaining balance is returned to the funding authority or appropriate fund’s reserves to become available for future projects.

FY 20/21 CIP budgeted expenditures are estimated to be $15.5 million. Transportation/Drainage projects in FY20 are estimated at $11.5 million; this amount represents approximately 74% of the FY 20/21 CIP budget.

151

The overall five-year CIP allocates $47 million to fund capital improvements, other maintenance capital outlay expenditures, and other non-capital type “projects” to accommodate restricted funding source reporting and monitoring requirements.

Project Funding Criteria The structural integrity and safety of the Orinda roadway system is the highest infrastructure priority of the community. The City Council has stated that street improvements are a primary goal in making capital investments, and over the last five years the residential streets have been rehabilitated. Additionally, Garbage Franchise Fee revenue within the General Fund are used to fund the on-going day-to-day maintenance and repair of City roadways. The CIP projects contained within this program have been carefully evaluated to ensure: 1) The City’s capital improvement needs are met, both now and in the future; and 2) The City Council’s strategic priorities and goals are met. The City Council uses the following criteria to determine mandatory, necessary, and desirable capital improvement project priorities:

• Health and Safety – Projects are required to ensure the safety of the citizens • Compliance – Projects are in accordance with Federal and State Law • Legal – Projects that are legally obligated to be constructed • In Progress – Projects yet to be completed • Joint Agreements – Cooperative projects with outside agencies and/or cities • Development Related Projects – Funding by development driven projects • Grants and Leveraging – Projects utilize minimal local funds to supplement large grants

152

Program Process The preparation of the Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Orinda is a coordinated effort between the CIP Project Managers and a CIP committee. The committee is comprised of the Senior Engineer, the City Engineer, the Director of Public Works and Engineering Services, the Director of Finance, the Director of Parks and Recreation, and the City Manager. Projects are prioritized and the list is evaluated to determine if funding is available or if a project should be listed in the unfunded future improvement category. The CIP is presented to the City Council for consideration. The listing of projects is then reviewed by the Planning Commission who then makes a determination of General Plan conformance. The draft document is then presented to the City Council for review and public input prior to final approval by the Council.

The CIP emphasizes project planning, with projects progressing through a number of phases prior to completion. At any given phase, Council has the opportunity to re-evaluate whether or not to proceed with a project given cost escalations, changing priorities, or funding challenges. Typically projects are designated to be in the CIP, are then studied, and subsequently follow the normal process of design, bid, and construction. Because of limited funding and resources, more projects will be designated in the CIP for consideration than will actually be built. As projects are studied, particularly if there is no funding currently available, staff has the opportunity to seek grants and other sources of revenues to bring projects to fruition.

Project Descriptions The Capital Improvement Plan Project Descriptions in Section II presents a summary of each proposed capital project, provides a narrative, a proposed schedule, estimated project allocations, and proposed funding sources. The financial summary for each element also shows estimated operating impact for all years. Project descriptions also include photos and/or maps. Estimates for carryover projects are updated as necessary to reflect current costs. The expenditure estimates shown in the CIP reflect cost estimates that will be further refined as design, engineering, and cost studies are completed. The CIP projects are arranged in the following project categories:

A. Funded projects B. Unfunded projects

The emphasis on long-range capital planning focuses attention on current and future needs of the City and balancing these needs with the City’s fiscal resources.

Economic Overview The coronavirus pandemic will likely have a significant negative impacts to City revenue, and therefore Staff has recommended only high priority projects be delivered, and pushed out other projects to later dates. City Council will have opportunity to approve key expenditures as more accurate forecasts on the economy are developed. The City Finance Department continues to cautiously forecast revenue projections for future years. The revenue projections have remained conservative, with the hope that surplus revenue can buffer short economic slowdowns. The City’s 153

property tax revenue forecast is not expected to increase as the impact of the pandemic on property valuations and real estate sales activity is not known. It is also not currently known how the pandemic will impact construction costs.

Conclusion The funds programmed in this year’s Capital Improvement Plan reflect the funding revenue challenges experienced by the City of Orinda. The CIP represents optimized use of available local funds by leveraging State and Federal funds to achieve the Council’s ongoing priority of infrastructure improvements. The City has met its goal of rehabilitating the pavement of our aging roadway network, and continues to commit available revenues to maintaining our roadways. Respectfully submitted, Steve Salomon Steve Salomon City Manager 154

II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

155 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 0023 Project Name Downtown and BART Wayfinding

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $221,914 Description This is a collaborative project with Bay Area Rapit Transit (BART) at the Orinda BART station. This project provides improvements that will encourage residents and visitors to the City to access the Orinda BART station and the local communities by walking or bicyling.

The elements of the Wayfinding project consists of wall graphic directional with map, district ID signs, directional map kiosks, directional totems, and directional panels mounted on existing street light poles.

This project has been completed Justification This project will reduce confusion and stress navigating downtown Orinda for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7127 Construction Costs 56,935 56,935 7126 Construction 24,809 24,809 Management Total 81,744 81,744

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 205 Transportation Impact 56,604 56,604 Fees 331 CCTA Project Specific 25,140 25,140 Grants Total 81,744 81,744

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 156 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 0044 Project Name Miner Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit

Type BRIDGES Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 50 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $852,704 Description Seismic Retrofit: Construct steel shear keys at bents. Bridge elevation and width would not be changed, nor would the wood railing.

Location: Miner Rd. Bridge over San Pablo Creek, 200 ft. north of Camino Pablo

Schedule: Engineering work underway. Construction expected in Summer 2021.

This project covers transactions for federal project STPLZ-5444 (019) beginning 9-10-2018 but inlcudes $101,600 paid back to Caltrans/Fed in July 2018 for predecessor project (which has been closed out). Justification This bridge has been identified as in need of a seismic retrofit.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Right of Way 50,000 50,000 Professional Services 7125 Design Contracts 150,000 172,000 322,000 7127 Construction Costs 200,000 64,000 264,000 7126 Construction 50,000 16,000 66,000 Management Total 150,000 472,000 80,000 702,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 205 Transportation Impact 17,000 20,000 37,000 Fees 255 Grants: Federal 133,000 417,000 71,000 621,000 260 Grants: State 35,000 9,000 44,000 Total 150,000 472,000 80,000 702,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 157 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 0067 Project Name El Toyonal EVA Bridge Rehabilitation

Type BRIDGES Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 20 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $50,002 Description Replace deteriorated wood decking on the bridge, as identified by engineering report which evaluated the capacity of the bridge. The report was done in response to a request by MOFD to place the required load limit signs on this bridge. This bridge is outside City limits, at the upper end of El Toyonal, but maintained by the City under agreement with the County. This is a fire road that connects upper El Toyonal in Orinda to Wildcat Canyon Rd. on the north side. The bridge is closed to non-emergency vehicles but used for trail/recreational use.

This project is complete. Replacing the deck boards allows MOFD fire enginesto utilize the bridge to access high risk fire areas at the upper end of El Toyonal. Justification Due to deterioration of the wood deck boards, MOFD will not be able to safely use the bridge for their engine trucks, but only lighter vehicles. This can be considered an emergency situation.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Right of Way 202 202 Professional Services 7127 Construction Costs 49,800 49,800 Total 50,002 50,002

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 700 Capital Improvement 50,002 50,002 (General) Total 50,002 50,002

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 158 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 0087 Project Name Bear Creek Bridge Seismic Retrofit

Type BRIDGES Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 50 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $1,436,950 Description Seismic Retrofit: Construct steel shear keys at bents and abutments, install retianers between girders, instlall seat extenders at piers and install base plate retrofits at pier columns. No changes to roadway or railing.

Location: Bear Creek Rd. Bridge over San Pablo Creek, 1,200 ft. east if Camino Pablo

Schedule: Engineering work underway. Construction expected in Summer 2021.

This project covers transactions for federal project STPLZ-5444 (018) beginning 9-14-2018 but includes $36,260 paid back to Caltrans/Fed in July 2018 for predecessor project (which has been closed out). Justification This bridge has been identified as in need of a seismic retrofit.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Right of Way 50,000 50,000 Professional Services 7125 Design Contracts 200,000 315,000 515,000 7127 Construction Costs 500,000 202,000 702,000 7126 Construction 60,000 38,000 98,000 Management Total 200,000 925,000 240,000 1,365,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 200 Gas Tax 23,440 36,560 60,000 255 Grants: Federal 176,560 818,440 212,000 1,207,000 260 Grants: State 70,000 28,000 98,000 Total 200,000 925,000 240,000 1,365,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 159 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4071 Project Name Miner Rd Pavement Rehab & Shoulder Widening

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $821,328 Description Rehabilitate existing pavement along Miner Road between Camino Pablo and Lombardy Lane, including adding width to selective shoulder pavement areas where feasible. The project will include an asphalt overlay and pavement widening. The project may require that Miner Road be closed during construction and public traffic will be detoured along Camino Sobrante to expedite the construction work. Funding includes $387,918 from EBMUD pursuant to a settlement agreement and would be dispersed upon completion of the project along Miner Road.

This project has been completed

Justification Roadway pavement rehabilitation work is necessary to prevent the pavement condition to fall into the "Poor" condition rating. Research has shown it would cost more to repair a roadway that deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 3,388 3,388 7127 Construction Costs 710,705 710,705 7126 Construction 19,080 19,080 Management Total 733,173 733,173

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 24,388 24,388 (L) 200 Gas Tax 320,867 320,867 262 Other Grants 387,918 387,918 Total 733,173 733,173

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 160 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4074 Project Name ADA Transition Plan Compliance (Roadway)

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life N/A Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $250,000 Description This is an ongoing project which removes barriers to accessibility in the public right of way by replacing curbs with curb ramps at crosswalks and other public roadway locations, upgrading curb ramps to current standards, as identified in the roadway portion of the City’s ADA Transition Plan. This project built ramps at Altarinda/Santa Maria for FY 19/20. The locations for curb ramp work are reviewed by TSAC under thieir responsibility to address issues related to disability and access (per Resolution 77-07). To supplement these funds, Staff will seek TDA funding or other funding when grant opportunities arise. This project built ramps at Altarinda/Santa Maria for FY 19/20. In future years, priority locations for curb ramps in high-demand pedestrian corridors such as the downtown areas, near schools, and Altarinda will be scheduled. Curb ramps within Paving Project areas, such as Orinda Way and Altarinda, will be evaluated and upgraded as needed with the work. It is anticipated that priority locations will be completed by the end of FY22/23. Justification To install and replace facilities to comply with the Americans with Disability Act Transition Plan.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 20,000 7127 Construction Costs 50,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 230,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 200 Gas Tax 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 161 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4092 Project Name Storm Drain Plan & Inventory

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life N/A Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $566,000 Description This is an ongoing project to manage storm drain assets in the public roads (pipes, culverts, catch basins, etc.) and plan repairs and maintenance. Recent work has included the conversion of storm drain maps and records to a GIS based system in 2018, and the preparation of a Strorm Drain Repair Plan in 2019. The Repair Plan prioritizes the repair of corrugated metal pipes, and is based on a 2019 engineering study by Drake Haglan & Assoicates. The GIS system will be expanded to include other assets and information, and will be updated and verified with field condtions. This project will fund the GIS work, which will be handled primarily by an Engineering Technician who will work part time. This project will also fund technical studies, video inspection (CCTV) for the condition assessment of pipes on an as-needed basis, and title research to assist the City to determine the status of drainage easements on as-needed basis.

This project also funds a part time GIS Technician, who is a full time employee with City of Lafayette, under a cost sharing agreement with Lafayette and Moraga for one year. The cost of such GIS services (2 days per week) is more economical when compared to engaging a consultant for the work. $48,000 is budgeted in FY 20/21 for this purpose.

Schedule: Ongoing Justification To identify needs and deficiencies within the City's drainage system to better plan for future capital improvement plan projects. To reduce the potential for catastrophic pipe failures such as the 2017 Miner Rd. Sinkhole

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 66,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 316,000 Total 66,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 316,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 210 Drainage Impact Fees 66,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 316,000 Total 66,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 316,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 162 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4094 Project Name Storm Drain Liner Ivy Dr (48in)

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 30 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $170,000 Description Repair a deteriorated storm drain pipe crossing Ivy Dr. near Descanso. This corrugated metal pipe has holes in the invert and debris buildup near the outlet. The repair will likely consist of cleaning out the debris, grading the creek bed at the outlet and lining the pipe. Regulatory permits will be required. The pipe extends under private property and Staff is in discussion with owner regarding their participation in the repairs of the private portion.

Justification Pipe is identified as a high priority repair in the Strom Drain Repair Plan for the city

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 40,000 40,000 7127 Construction Costs 130,000 130,000 Total 40,000 130,000 170,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 210 Drainage Impact Fees 40,000 130,000 170,000 Total 40,000 130,000 170,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 163 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4107 Project Name Traffic Calming Improvements Program

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life N/A Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $138,000 Description Projects will be developed based on citizen requests that follow the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program process and eventually are considered by the City Council before funding is assigned to each project.

Schedule: Generally the process is expected to take six months for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program process, and assuming Council approval - another 3-4 months to install the calming improvements.

Justification Due to consistent traffic calming requests throughout the City, staff and TSAC has recommended that an annual program be established to fund traffic calming improvements.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 1,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,000 Total 1,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 200 Gas Tax 1,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,000 Total 1,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 164 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4109 Project Name Annual Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways Program

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life N/A Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $161,000 Description The Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways Master Plan ("BTW Plan") was adopted January 2011. Projects will be identified for grant opportunities such as Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS), Transportation Development Act (TDA), Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC), and Active Transportation Projects (ATP). Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways (BTW) Project(s) will be selected annually from the priority list of unfunded BTW projects in the CIP and in coordination/recommendation of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee (TSAC is the City's designated Bicycle Advisory Committee).

The City maintain a "Top 10 Priority List" of the BTW projects (attached at the end of the Project Desriptions seciton herein) as a guide for grant opportunities. Money budgeted in this project can be used as the city match if required for such grants. Justification The Annual Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways Program is intended as a supplemental City funding program to provide local match fund requirements to larger federal and statewide grants.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 1,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 161,000 Total 1,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 161,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 205 Transportation Impact 1,000 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 71,000 Fees 332 CCTA Supplemental (28C) 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 90,000 Total 1,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 161,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 165 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4111 Project Name Annual Drainage Facilities Improvement Program

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life N/A Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $1,357,321 Description Develop and implement minor repairs and replacement of City-maintained drainage facilities. Annual projects correct problem locations identified during the storm season or through ongoing inspections. Project locations are coordinated with the annual paving project). These funds are intended for small scale repairs and/or can be transferred to supplement drainage improvements on the Annual Pavement Management project or the Measure J and L Pavement/Drainage Rehabilitation project. The amount budgeted reflects only an estimate of funding available. It does not reflect the cost of repairs necessary to rehabilitate the drainage facilities. As projects are identified in the Storm Drain Plan with estimated cost of repairs, increased annual drainage funding will need to be determined to reflect the necessary rehabilitation/ replacement costs.

Schedule: Annual drainage projects will be selected in coordination with the Annual Paving program and Storm Drain Plan unless they require immediate repair. The Storm Drain Plan (Project 4092) will provide condition assessments of selected existing facilities and identify which are to be scheduled into the CIP as rehabilitation projects. Justification Minor repair and replacement of City's aging drainage facilities.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 2,321 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 102,321 7127 Construction Costs 135,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 195,000 1,005,000 7126 Construction 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 100,000 Management Total 137,321 275,000 275,000 275,000 245,000 1,207,321

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 210 Drainage Impact Fees 90,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 120,000 660,000 700 Capital Improvement 47,321 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 547,321 (General) Total 137,321 275,000 275,000 275,000 245,000 1,207,321

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 166 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4118/4132 Project Name 2018 Measure J & L Pavement Rehab

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $15,531,053 Description This project utilized Measure L, Half-cent Sales Tax Funds, and Measure J& L bonds to rehabilitate residential roads with new pavement using full reconstruction, full depth reclamation, cold in place recycling, etc.; and rehabilitate or replace drainage facilities underneath or adjacent to the roadway. The Measure J & L Paving program is only for residential roads with a PCI 25 or less.

This was a joint project with Moraga, for which Orinda was reimbursed for the Total Costs of work for the Town of Moraga including: project design, construction, and construction management. The project was bid under one contract, and Moraga's portion is paid from monies received from the Town of Moraga and accounted for in Fund 700. Moraga has also paid Orinda a $10,000 administration fee. Moraga's portion is approximately $1,882,000 and is reflected in the totals shown herein, and also tracked as project # 4132.

Schedule: Work was completed in 2018. Final payments to the construction manager were made in 2019 and the project has been closed out. Justification Roadway pavement rehabilitation work is necessary to prevent the pavement condition to fall into the "Poor" condition rating. Research has shown it would cost more to repair a roadway that deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7126 Construction 3,320 3,320 Management Total 3,320 3,320

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 700 Capital Improvement 3,320 3,320 (General) Total 3,320 3,320

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 167 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4119/4120 Project Name 2019 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehab

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $13,634,381 Description This project will use Measure L, Half-cent Sales Tax Funds, and Measure J& L bonds to rehabilitate residential roads with new pavement using full reconstruction, full depth reclamation, cold in place recycling, etc.; and rehabilitate or replace drainage facilities underneath or adjacent to the roadway. The Measure J & L Paving program is only for residential roads with a PCI 25 or less.

Note: this project includes $50,000 cost for curb ramp installation on Altarinda/Santa Maria, which will be charged against Project #4074, ADA Transition Plan Compliance

Schedule: Work began in Summer 2019 and will be complete in 2020.

Gas Tax funding in FY 19/20 includes construction expenditures of $100,000 LPP and RMRA (estimated $330,000 planned FY 19/20 for subject project, and $339,000 carryover from FY 18/19) Justification Roadway pavement rehabilitation work is necessary to prevent the pavement condition to fall into the "Poor" condition rating. Research has shown it would cost more to repair a roadway that deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 97,473 97,473 7127 Construction Costs 11,415,279 954,000 12,369,279 7126 Construction 498,000 166,000 664,000 Management Total 12,010,752 1,120,000 13,130,752

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 687,450 620,000 1,307,450 (L) 200 Gas Tax 801,265 801,265 330 CCTA Return To Source 25,552 25,552 (Local Share) 335 Road Maint Fee (Solid 425,000 500,000 925,000 Waste Provider) 741 GO Bond 2016 (L) 10,071,485 10,071,485 Total 12,010,752 1,120,000 13,130,752

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 168 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4128 Project Name Camino Pablo Bicycle Route Corridor Improvements

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $550,000 Description Improve, upgrade, and complete gaps in bicycle facilities along the Camino Pablo Bicycle Route corridor between El Toyonal and Moraga Way in Downtown Orinda. The project includes the installation of bike loop detectors and signal improvements at:

1.El Toyonal & Camino Pablo 2.Broookwood Road & Camino Pablo 3.Camino Encinas & Camino Pablo/Moraga Way

The project will also reduce a concrete island and extend the existing Class II bicycle lane located on Camino Pablo and Orinda Way to reduce bicycle/vehicle conflict, upgrade the class III bikeway to a class II bicycle lane (buffered when possible) between the SR-24 off-ramp and the BART station, add green paint to conflict zones, and install sharrows at the Theatre square area leading to and from the St. Steven’s Trail.

The project is currently in the final design stage. Justification This project improve the bicycle facilities in the area.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 110,909 110,909 7127 Construction Costs 369,154 369,154 7126 Construction 69,937 69,937 Management Total 110,909 439,091 550,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 263 Transportation 110,909 39,091 150,000 Development Act (TDA) 331 CCTA Project Specific 400,000 400,000 Grants Total 110,909 439,091 550,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 169 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4131 Project Name Glorietta Elementary Safe Route to School

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $486,500 Description To create a safer pedestrian route to Glorietta Elementary school, convert the road shoulder on the west side (school side) of Glorietta Blvd. to a shared-use path (pedestrians and bicycles). An asphalt dike (6 inch high) would be installed between the roadway/travel lane and the shoulder. The construction work also involves milling/grinding the existing asphalt shoulder and replacing it with a new asphalt surface that would be re- graded to limit the cross slope to 2% (for accessibility requirements). The existing shoulder width is between 5 ft. and 5.5 ft., and in most cases it will not be changed. It would be widened slightly where feasible but no further than existing private fencing, even though excess city right of way is available. The project extent is north of the School to Overhill Rd. and south to Rheem Blvd.

Given Orinda’s interest in preserving a rural atmosphere, this shared path is an alternative to traditional concrete sidewalks; this project’s scope was changed from the originally proposed sidewalk on Hillcrest Road due to neighborhood opposition to the sidewalk.

Schedule: Project was constructed in a combined contract with the 2019 Annual Paving Project for economies of scale. Construction was substantially completed in August 2019. Justification To improve pedestrian access to Glorietta Elementary School.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 7,150 7,150 7127 Construction Costs 351,500 351,500 7126 Construction 54,400 54,400 Management Total 413,050 413,050

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 200 Gas Tax 99,500 99,500 331 CCTA Project Specific 313,550 313,550 Grants Total 413,050 413,050

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 170 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4137 Project Name Moraga Way Crosswalk at Brookside Road

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $65,000 Description New corsswalk on Moraga Way at Brookside Road. Install pedestrian crossing devices (push button activated beacon (RRFB, Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon), and activated advance signage. Restore/replace pavement at east side landing and stripe crosswalk per Caltrans SP A24F.

In FY 2019/20, MTC allocated $30,000 in additional TDA funds for this project in order to utilize diverted funding from project 4135

City staff performed PM and CM work which was reimbursed through TDA funds

Schedule: Construction was substantially completed in December 2019. Justification To improve pedestrian facility in this area.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 940 940 7127 Construction Costs 59,000 59,000 7126 Construction 5,060 5,060 Management Total 65,000 65,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 263 Transportation 65,000 65,000 Development Act (TDA) Total 65,000 65,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 171 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4138 Project Name Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $770,000 Description Perform pavement rehabilitation/maintenance of Orinda Way between cul de sac near Santa Maria Way and Camino Pablo through the Orinda Village Downtown District. Includes required upgrades for ADA curb ramps and ADA parking spaces.

Schedule: Based on TIP programming, construction would occur in summer 2021. Consider bidding with annual paving project for economies of scale

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 10,000 30,000 40,000 7127 Construction Costs 380,000 300,000 680,000 7126 Construction 30,000 20,000 50,000 Management Total 10,000 440,000 320,000 770,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 200 Gas Tax 10,000 60,000 50,000 120,000 255 Grants: Federal 380,000 270,000 650,000 Total 10,000 440,000 320,000 770,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 172 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4140 Project Name Martha Rd-Catherine Ct Ped Path

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 30 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $491,634 Description This project is in the City BTW Plan, and the condition of the Pedestrian Path has been determined and surveyed. The neighborhood supports improving the path.

Based on the assessment and cost estimates, the scope of work has been determined.

Justification This facility is aged and does not meet accessibiity requirements.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 1,141 1,141 7125 Design Contracts 38,860 50,000 88,860 7127 Construction Costs 330,000 330,000 7126 Construction 40,000 40,000 Management Total 1,141 38,860 420,000 460,001

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 205 Transportation Impact 1,141 38,860 40,001 Fees 700 Capital Improvement 420,000 420,000 (General) Total 1,141 38,860 420,000 460,001

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 173 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4146 Project Name Green Infrastructure Program for Pavement Projects

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 20 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $120,000 Description As required by the State Water Board's municipal NPDES permit, the City of Orinda adopted a Green Infrastructure Plan in 2019. Green infrastructure refers to the construction and retrofit of storm drainage to reduce runoff volumes, disperse runoff to vegetated areas, harvest and use runoff where feasible, promote infiltration and evapotranspiration, and use bioretention and other natural systems to detain and treat runoff before it reaches creeks and the San Francisco Bay. The treatment is also intended to remove PCB, Mercury and other pollutants from stormwater. The purpose of this page is to reflect the need to set aside funds for the Green Infrastructure element in future residential paving projects. In most cases, the cost of the green infrastructure will be incorporated into the paving projects. The estimated cost of such work over the next 20 years (to meet the 2040 target treatment acreage) is $1 million to $2 million.

A GI bioswale facility has been designed and will be constructed on Lavenida Dr. as part of the 2019 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The cost of the engineering and construction is incorporated in that project and amounts to approximtely $ 30,000. Work is scheduled to be completed circa July 2020. Justification In order to be in compliance with the reissued Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP2), adopted by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board on November 19, 2015 (Order No. R2-2015-0049), the Green Infrastructure Plan submitted by Oinda sets target amounts of areas to be treated using green infrastructure for an approximate 20 year period, ending in 2040.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 5,000 10,000 15,000 7127 Construction Costs 20,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 105,000 Total 25,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 120,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 25,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 (L) Total 25,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 120,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 174 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4148 Project Name Lavenida Culvert Repair

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 30 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $215,000 Description Repair a 120-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe culvert that conveys a tributary stream of Moraga Creek under Lavenida Road. Pipe inspection found corrosion and metal loss in the invert (flow line) of the pipe. Needs permits from resource agencies, which would likely require "mitigation" work on upstream creek banks. Repair plan would be to line the invert with concrete.

Justification Pipe is currently distorted due to the invert deterioration, and continued deterioration may impede the flow and cause flooding and erosion of the road bank, which could impact and destabalize the roadway.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 50,000 50,000 7125 Design Contracts 25,000 25,000 7127 Construction Costs 130,000 130,000 7126 Construction 10,000 10,000 Management Total 50,000 165,000 215,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 50,000 165,000 215,000 (L) Total 50,000 165,000 215,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 175 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4150 Project Name 2020 Annual Pavement Project

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $6,606,355 Description To maintain road pavement, the City utilizes a Pavement Management System which uses data based on actual pavement condition to schedule maintenance treatments on a road by road basis. Using these results, a list of streets is determined in coordination with the CIOC. This annual pavement project will consist of various road treatments such as crack sealing, slurry seal, mill and fill asphalt or full depth reclamation. Stormdrains under public roads are inspected and repaired/replaced as needed. This project includes Camino Pablo Traffic Calming (project TBD 3010).

Construction will occur in summer 2020

Note Gas Tax exenditures in 20/21 include construction funded though SB1 RMRA (est. $320,000). Note no LPP funding this fiscal year.

As is typical for these paving projects, the bid estimate includes utility cover adjustments (approx. $200,000 for this project). Depending on bid prices, the utilty companies may agree to have city contractor do the work and then would reimburse city (and that amount would be credited back to the Fund the work was charged to). If the utility does not agree, they will arrange to do the work and it will be deleted from the city project. Justification Roadway pavement rehabilitation work is necessary to prevent the pavement condition to fall into the "Poor" condition rating. Research has shown it would cost more to repair a roadway that deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 310,000 46,355 356,355 7127 Construction Costs 5,950,000 5,950,000 7126 Construction 5,000 295,000 300,000 Management Total 315,000 6,291,355 6,606,355

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 976,556 976,556 (L) 200 Gas Tax 425,000 425,000 205 Transportation Impact 45,000 45,000 Fees 330 CCTA Return To Source 820,000 820,000 (Local Share) 335 Road Maint Fee (Solid 315,000 873,638 1,188,638 Waste Provider) 741 GO Bond 2016 (L) 3,151,161 3,151,161 Total 315,000 6,291,355 6,606,355

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 176 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4151 Project Name Brookwood Culvert Repair

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 30 Contact Puublic Works (925) 253-423 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $29,150 Description Repair a 144-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe culvert that conveys San Pablo Creek under Brookwood Road. Pipe inspection found corrosion and metal loss in the invert (flow line) of the pipe. Repair plans has been prepared and pricing quote has been obtained from a contractor. Regulatory permits were obtained. Work completed.

Justification Failure of the pipe would create potential safety issues, and cause road damage and access problems in this commercial area adjacent to Highway 24.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7127 Construction Costs 29,150 29,150 Total 29,150 29,150

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 200 Gas Tax 29,150 29,150 Total 29,150 29,150

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 177 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4152 Project Name Camino Sobrante at Golf Course Slide Stabilization

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 50 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $700,000 Description An existing retaining wall approximately 300 feet north of the 24 Camino Sobrante supports a section of Camino Sobrante roadway. The wall height varies from 2 feet to about 10 feet and is approximately 175 feet long. The unreinforced stone and mortar retaining wall shows severe distress; several full height vertical cracks in the central portion and an outward tilt over a majority of its length.

Justification The existing wall continues to move and may eventually fail, creating road instability and potentially impacting golf course operations, which City would possibly be liable for

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 25,000 55,000 80,000 7127 Construction Costs 550,000 550,000 7126 Construction 70,000 70,000 Management Total 25,000 55,000 620,000 700,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 620,000 620,000 (L) 200 Gas Tax 25,000 55,000 80,000 Total 25,000 55,000 620,000 700,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 178 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4153 Project Name Loma Vista Pavement Repair

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $300,000 Description Repair of severe pavement distress on section of Loma Vista drive between 44 and 52 Loma Vista. Repair by utilizing soldier pile and wood lagging wall with tiebacks.

Justification Road needs to be stablized to prevent further distress and potential road closure

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 55,000 55,000 7127 Construction Costs 230,000 230,000 7126 Construction 15,000 15,000 Management Total 55,000 245,000 300,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 55,000 245,000 300,000 (L) Total 55,000 245,000 300,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 179 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4155 Project Name 2021 Annual Pavement Project

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $3,000,000 Description To maintain road pavement, the City utilizes a Pavement Management System which uses data based on actual pavement condition to schedule maintenance treatments on a road by road basis. Using these results, a list of streets is determined in coordination with the CIOC. This annual pavement project will consist of various road treatments such as crack sealing, slurry seal, mill and fill asphalt or full depth reclamation. Funding is by a combination of the Orinda Add-On Sales Tax, Gas Tax, CCTA Return to Source, CCTA 28c, and Road Maintenance Fees (Solid Waste Provider).

Construction would occur in summer 2021

Assumes RMRA $345,000 + LPP $200,000= $545,000 min. Gas Tax funding required in FY 21/22 (Construciton funding) Justification Roadway pavement rehabilitation work is necessary to prevent the pavement condition to fall into the "Poor" condition rating. Research has shown it would cost more to repair a roadway that deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 140,000 20,000 160,000 7127 Construction Costs 50,000 2,700,000 2,750,000 7126 Construction 5,000 85,000 90,000 Management Total 195,000 2,805,000 3,000,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 1,265,000 1,265,000 (L) 200 Gas Tax 195,000 600,000 795,000 330 CCTA Return To Source 345,000 345,000 (Local Share) 335 Road Maint Fee (Solid 595,000 595,000 Waste Provider) Total 195,000 2,805,000 3,000,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 180 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4162 Project Name 2020 Stormdrain Improvement

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 50 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $205,000 Description The storm drain culverts listed below are in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culverts will require rehabilitation. •548 Miner Road (PL-440) •549 Miner Road (PL-483) •265 Camino Pablo (PL-1206) •216 Camino Sobrante (PL-1456)

Justification Failure of the pipe(s) would create potential safety issues, and cause road damage and access problems.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7127 Construction Costs 180,000 180,000 7126 Construction 25,000 25,000 Management Total 205,000 205,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 210 Drainage Impact Fees 205,000 205,000 Total 205,000 205,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 181 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4165 Project Name Pavement Rehab - El Toyonal, Oak Flat, La Espiral

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $900,000 Description Due to utility company replacement work (EBMUD water mains on El Toyonal and La Espiral and CCCSD sewer main on Oak Flat Rd.), repaving work on these streets has been delayed. These streets were part of the 2019 annual paving project and now are included in a separate project to be performed when the utility company work is completed, estimated to be summer 2022. The design work has already been completed.

Justification To maintain pavement condition index goals for Orinda's public roads

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7127 Construction Costs 467,000 370,000 837,000 7126 Construction 30,000 33,000 63,000 Management Total 497,000 403,000 900,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 497,000 403,000 900,000 (L) Total 497,000 403,000 900,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 182 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4166 Project Name 2022 Annual Pavement Project

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $3,750,000 Description This project/program has been added to reflect the intended future use of Orinda Add-On Sales Tax, Gas Tax, CCTA Return to Source, CCTA 28c and Road Maintenance Fees (Solid Waste Provider) for pavement maintenance related projects. Note that the City may also elect to use these funds for other transportation related projects such as bridge, roadway drainage, slope stabilization, bike, pedestrian, etc. projects.

This is a place holder. Future pavement maintenance project lists will be determined with coordination with the CIOC. As individual projects are identified, individual project sheets will be generated and the funding on this project will be reduced as funds are committed to the individual projects.

Assumes RMRA $355,000 + LPP $200,000= $555,000 min. Gas Tax funding required in FY 21/22 Justification Roadway pavement rehabilitation work is necessary to prevent the pavement condition to fall into the "Poor" condition rating. Research has shown it would cost more to repair a roadway that deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 140,000 20,000 160,000 7127 Construction Costs 50,000 3,450,000 3,500,000 7126 Construction 5,000 85,000 90,000 Management Total 195,000 3,555,000 3,750,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 195,000 1,150,000 1,345,000 (L) 200 Gas Tax 600,000 600,000 330 CCTA Return To Source 505,000 505,000 (Local Share) 335 Road Maint Fee (Solid 1,300,000 1,300,000 Waste Provider) Total 195,000 3,555,000 3,750,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 183 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4167 Project Name Storm Drain Moraga Wy & Coral

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 50 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $966,900 Description The storm drain culverts listed below are in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culverts will require replacement or rehabilitation and obtaining regulatory permits (which may take one year). •95 Coral Drive (PL-927) •188 Moraga Way (PL-454) •3 Risa Court (PL-898)

Justification These storm drains require repair and/replacement and are highest proirity locations in the 2019 Storm Drain Repair Plan Failure of the pipe(s) would create potential safety issues, and cause road damage and access problems.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 93,000 100,000 100,000 293,000 7127 Construction Costs 586,000 586,000 7126 Construction 87,900 87,900 Management Total 93,000 100,000 773,900 966,900

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 210 Drainage Impact Fees 93,000 100,000 773,900 966,900 Total 93,000 100,000 773,900 966,900

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 184 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4168 Project Name Ped Path MoragaWy ECM to Altam

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $250,000 Description Provide separated pedestrian pathway on west side of Moraga Way from El Camino Moraga and Altamount Dr. utilizing a six-inch high asphalt berm (dike).

Justification To improve pedestrian safety.

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 50,000 50,000 7127 Construction Costs 170,000 170,000 7126 Construction 30,000 30,000 Management Total 50,000 200,000 250,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 205 Transportation Impact 164,200 164,200 Fees 263 Transportation 50,000 35,800 85,800 Development Act (TDA) Total 50,000 200,000 250,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 185 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4169 Project Name Crosswalk Orindawoods KiteHill

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $75,000 Description Place a new crosswalk at this location: install solar powered RRFB’s (rectangular rapid flashing beacons), stripe a ladder-type crosswalk and construct a new curb ramp on the east side of Orindawoods Dr. The system would be activated by push buttons on each side. Orinda has three other similar systems in use. This project was requested by the public through TSAC, who then recommended it be included in the CIP.

Justification Improve pedestian safety

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 8,000 8,000 7127 Construction Costs 67,000 67,000 Total 75,000 75,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 700 Capital Improvement 75,000 75,000 (General) Total 75,000 75,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 186 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4170 Project Name Drainage Impvt 25 La Cuesta

Type DRAINAGE Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 30 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $31,500 Description A failing, shallow, cobble rock lined ditch at this location needs upgrading (with a deeper ditch) so that overflow will not flood adjacent properties.

Justification improve drainage

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7127 Construction Costs 31,500 31,500 Total 31,500 31,500

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 700 Capital Improvement 31,500 31,500 (General) Total 31,500 31,500

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 187 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4171 Project Name 2023 Annual Paving Project

Type ROADS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $3,000,000 Description This project/program has been added to reflect the intended future use of Orinda Add-On Sales Tax, Gas Tax, CCTA Return to Source, CCTA 28c and Road Maintenance Fees (Solid Waste Provider) for pavement maintenance related projects. Note that the City may also elect to use these funds for other transportation related projects such as bridge, roadway drainage, slope stabilization, bike, pedestrian, etc. projects.

Assumes RMRA $360,000 + LPP $200,000= $560,000 min. Gas Tax funding required in FY 21/22

The current 1/2 cent add-on Sales Tax ends in FY 22/23 Justification Roadway pavement rehabilitation work is necessary to prevent the pavement condition to fall into the "Poor" condition rating. Research has shown it would cost more to repair a roadway that deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or reconstruction is necessary.

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax 195,000 300,000 495,000 (L) 200 Gas Tax 650,000 650,000 330 CCTA Return To Source 728,000 728,000 (Local Share) 335 Road Maint Fee (Solid 1,127,000 1,127,000 Waste Provider) Total 195,000 2,805,000 3,000,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 188 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4172 Project Name Ped Xing Improvement Glorietta at Virginia

Type BIKEWAYS / WALKWAYS Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life 15 Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $50,000 Description Install solar powered RRFB’s (rectangular rapid flashing beacons) at the existing crosswalk at this location. The system would be activated by push buttons on each side. Orinda has three other similar systems in use. This project was requested by the public through TSAC, who then recommended it be included in the CIP.

Justification Improve pedestrian safety. This project was referred by TSAC

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7125 Design Contracts 5,000 5,000 7127 Construction Costs 45,000 45,000 Total 50,000 50,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 205 Transportation Impact 50,000 50,000 Fees Total 50,000 50,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 189 Capital Improvement Plan '19/'20thru '23/'24 City of Orinda, California

Project # 4176 Project Name Washington Ln. Widening Study

Type Unassigned Department PUBLIC WORKS Useful Life N/A Contact Public Works (925) 253-4231 Category TRANSPORTATION / DRAIN

Total Project Cost: $30,000 Description Preliminary alignment study for the potential road widening of Washington Lane. MOFD emergency vehicle access along Washington Lane is critical to fighting a wildfire on the north side of Orinda. The initial study would include a topographic survey and development of alignment alternatives to provide a minimum pavement width of 28 feet; or more to include on-street parking and possibly a standard sidewalk. The study would include a preliminary cost estimate for future CIP budgets. Extensive outreach and coordination would need to be conducted with the nine fronting property owners. The existing pavement width is approximately 20 feet and the public right of way is 50 feet.

Justification Allows improved emergency access for MOFD

Expenditures '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 7180 Planning / Environmental 30,000 30,000 Total 30,000 30,000

Funding Sources '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24 Total 700 Capital Improvement 30,000 30,000 (General) Total 30,000 30,000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 190 CITY OF ORINDA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UNFUNDED CIP PROJECTS LIST FY 2020 to FY 2024 CIP

In lieu of individual project sheets for projects that do not have funding, this list represent projects that of significance but do not have funding sources identified. These projects will not move forward unless funding sources can be identified. The order of the project listed below do not present priority.

Public Works Dept. /Transportation Projects 1. Downtown Intersection Operational Improvements Description/Notes: Consider reconfiguration of the intersection of Camino Pablo/EB Hwy 24 Off- ramp/Brookwood Rd, including a traffic circle/roundabout or removal of some traffic movements. Due to the five legs to this intersection, signal operations are protracted and can be somewhat difficult to discern. Due to the high volumes of vehicles along Camino Pablo and the Hwy 24 off-ramp, multi-lanes within the circle must be considered to operate with reasonable level of service. Special consideration must be evaluated for pedestrian and bicycle traffic safety due to the lack of right of way control afforded by standard traffic signals. Cost: TBD

2. Camino Sobrante Slope Stabilization Description/Notes: This project contemplates a reconstruction and rehabilitation of Camino Sobrante from Orinda Way east to El Ribero. No funds have been secured for this major reconstruction project, which will include a geotechnical study for slope stabilization and repair. Cost: TBD

3. Moraga Way at Stein Way Improvements Description/Notes: The project is identified in the Lamorinda Fee and Financing Authority Expenditure Plan. It would address the increased traffic accessing Moraga Way at this intersection. The scope of the project is still to be determined. Cost: $750,000

4. Rheem Blvd. & Glorietta Blvd. Intersection Improvements (#3038) Description/Notes: The need for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection was identified in the Lamorinda Transportation Improvement Program (1994) based on the proposed Rancho Palos Colorados project in Moraga, which has not yet occurred. The need for improvements to this intersection continues to be monitored and will likely not be implemented until Moraga completes their Rancho Palos Colorados project. Cost: $TBD

5. Sign Inventory and Replacement Description/Notes: Inventory of Existing Roadway Signage including condition and retroreflectivity; add to GIS database. Establish a protocol of sign replacement by type or age Cost: $TBD

191 6. Full trash capture/Triton Drop Inlet to capture oil & grease runoff from Chevron Description/Notes: Install full trash capture device at inlet near Chevron gas station. Chevron may have a future improvement project. Depending on the future improvement project, the City may place a requirement for Chevron to construct this project. Cost: $TBD

7. Happy Valley Road Guardrail/Embankment Stabilization Description/Notes: Repair the slide on the northerly side of Happy Valley Road south of Sundown Terrance (near the border of Lafayette), consider soldier pile retaining walls along the west side of Happy Valley Road just north of the Sundown Terrance, and provide additional pavement width to install metal beam guardrails. Ref. CCTA CTPL potential project list.

Cost: $1,000,000+

8. Rheem Boulevard Culvert Repair (2023) -Storm Drain Repair -Group 1 (Note Strom Drain Repair Groups are organized by priority based on the City’s Storm Drain Repair Plan, 2019, with Group 1 being the highest priority in this unfunded list) Description/Notes: This culvert (PL-492), located near 15 Rheem Boulevard, is in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culvert will require replacement, repairing the headwall, slope stabilization and obtaining regulatory permits (which may take one year to obtain). Cost: $924,000

9. Various Storm Drain pipe Repair (2024) - Group 2 Description/Notes: The storm drain culverts listed below are in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culverts will require replacement or rehabilitation and obtaining regulatory permits (which may take one year to obtain). • 123 Orchard Road (PL-513) • 4 Orchard Road (PL-409) • 207 Moraga Way (PL-452) Cost: $915,750

10. Various Storm Drain pipe repair – Group 3 Description/Notes: The storm drain culverts listed below are in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culverts will require replacement or rehabilitation and obtaining regulatory permits. • 2 Dos Encinas (PL-864) • 232 Ivy Drive (PL-958) • 232 Ivy Drive (PL-959) Cost: $1,030,000

192 11. Various Storm Drain pipe repair – Group 4 Description/Notes: The storm drain culverts listed below are in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culverts will require replacement or rehabilitation and obtaining regulatory permits. • 199 Canon Drive (PL-1765) • 199 Canon Drive (PL-1766) • 8 Alta Vista (PL-1775) Cost: $1,503,150

12. Various Storm Drain pipe repair –Group 5 Description/Notes: The storm drain culverts listed below are in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culverts will require replacement or rehabilitation and obtaining regulatory permits. • 10 Ranch Road (PL-1074) • 511 Bear Creek Road (PL-1089) • 70 Van Tassel Lane (PL-1809) Cost: $1,048,900

13. Various Storm Drain pipe repair – Group 6 Description/Notes: The storm drain culverts listed below are in critical condition as identified in the highest priority pipes list, in the City’s Storm Drain Plan. The culverts will require replacement or rehabilitation and obtaining regulatory permits. • 38 Lost Valley Drive (PL-751) • 295 Orchard Road (PL-580) • 58 Brookside Road (PL-437) • El Camino Moraga (PL-867) Cost: $961,000

14. Ichabod Ln. Drainage (CIP Project #4154) Description/Notes: Per request from resident to reduce surface drainage in gutter along the frontage of the beginning of Ichabod Lane (89 Sleepy Hollow Lane) by installing new storm drain system 200’ uphill to open space ditch. Cost: $50,000 to $425,000, depending on extent of new stormdrain line

Public Works Dept. /Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects

15. Camino Pablo Pathway Rehabilitation Description/Notes: Pavement rehabilitation of Camino Pablo pathway from Wagner Ranch Elementary School to Orinda Way. (#1 on “Top 10” list compiled from BTW Plan) Cost: $TBD

16. Miner Road Pedestrian Bridge at San Pablo Creek Description/Notes: Construct a pedestrian bridge over San Pablo Creek. Ref. CCTA CTPL potential project list. Cost: $TBD

193 17. Brookwood Road Walkway Description/Notes: Provide a pedestrian walkway along Brookwood Road. (#7 on “Top 10” list compiled from BTW Plan) Cost: $TBD

18. Sandblast & Paint Pedestrian Overcrossing Hwy. 24 on-ramp (end of Orinda Way) Description/Notes: Sandblast and paint this Caltrans-owned bridge, which is maintained by the City under a Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans. Work will need to include containment facilities. Caltrans permits will be required. Cost: $125,000

Parks & Recreation Dept./Parks

19. Park and Recreation Master Plan (#4059) Description/Notes: Develop a Parks and recreation Master Plan with consideration of the recently adopted Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways Master Plan. The existing Master Plan was adopted in 1988. Cost: $100,000

20. Parklands Acquisition (#4060) Description/Notes: Provide funding for parkland acquisition opportunities as provided in the Orinda General Plan and Parks Master Plan. Cost: $TBD

21. Park Monument Signage (#4113) Description/Notes: Develop program to replace aging signs, and implement, subject to design and cost estimates. Cost: $ TBD

22. Replace Natural Grass Turf at Wilder Field 3 (CIP Project #4149) Description/Notes: Replace fescue turf with Bermuda grass, which is more durable and requires less irrigation. Cost: $200,000

Parks & Recreation Dept./Facilities

23. Art & Garden Center Parking Lot Description/Notes: Construct a parking lot uphill of the Art & Garden Center with ADA pathway. Funding has not be identified. Wilder residents have provided initial feedbacks. The scope of this parking lot needs to be further developed. Cost: $150,000

24. Community Center Exterior Painting (#4033) Description/Notes: Painting of the Community Center and Library Buildings. This project is considered a long term maintenance expenditure. (Library painting is now under separate funded project #TBD10) Cost: $140,000 194 25. Upgrades to City Hall Pedestrian Paths Description/Notes: Upgrade City Hall pedestrian paths, including adding lighting and railing. Cost: $50,000

26. Community Center Kitchen Renovations (#4022) Description/Notes: Upgrade kitchen to meet current health and safety codes. Cost: $75,000

27. Orinda Oaks Park Restroom Replacement (#TBD4012) Description/Notes: The project replaces the existing aged restroom with a new, efficient and accessible facility. Cost: $100,000

28. Replace the Roof Covering on the Wilder Ranch House Description/Notes: Replace the existing wood shake roof covering on the Wilder Ranch that has exceeded its useful life with a compliant alternative material. Cost: $25,000

Planning Dept.

29. Near-Term Downtown Pedestrian Safety and Beautification Enhancements Description/Notes: The project area for this project is focused on the connections between the Theatre District and BART and the Village District and BART. This includes re-opening the second pedestrian entrance to BART, beautification of the pedestrian undercrossing, pedestrian safety and comfort improvements, and improving the landing of the walkway from the pedestrian bridge from BART to the Village District, including creating a gateway to the existing pedestrian bridge near the southern end of Orinda Way (as detailed on pages 22-27 and 36-38 of the ConnectOrinda Plan). Potential funding could come from Measure RR and CCTA Measure J. Ref. CCTA CTPL potential project #3043. Cost: $50,000 - 650,000

30. Construct Living Landscape Berm on Bryant Way Description/Notes: Enhance Bryant Way through visual screening and freeway noise attenuation by creating an earthen mound with vegetation on top of it along the freeway side of Bryant Way (as detailed on pages 42-44 of the ConnectOrindaPlan). (Note this project is an expansion of the “Visual Screening Enhancements” project which appeared in the 2019-2023 Potential Project List (F). The planting work in that project was completed) Cost: $200,000 - $400,000

31. San Pablo Creek Restoration (CIP Project #4159) Description/Notes: Perform creek hydrology study work, determine potential creek alignments, determine trail alignments for future pedestrian creek trail, provide a pedestrian connection to the de Laveaga (EBMUD) trail, and perform property acquisition due diligence. Plan for public creek access (as detailed on pages 28-32 of the ConnectOrinda Plan). Future creek restoration phases would include CEQA compliance and project implementation. Note: The State Water 195 Board has allowed mitigation fees (from creek/culvert project regulatory permit conditions) to be paid into this project. Cost: $125,000

32. Library Terrace Area Pedestrian Improvements Description/Notes: This project will include replacing the existing surface material with decomposed granite, installing string lighting (if not already completed through remaining ConnectOrinda funds), permanent games (such as concrete foosball), and outdoor furnishings that transform the area into a well-used area for people of all ages that remains beautiful (as detailed on pages 33-35 of the ConnectOrinda Plan). Cost: $100,000

33. Murals Along Camino Pablo Near State Route 24 Description/Notes: Create murals along Camino Pablo near State Route 24 and Vashell Way. This includes the pedestrian bridges between the two sides of Downtown and BART (as shown on pages 61-62 of the ConnectOrinda Plan). The Vashell Way mural would be located on the south-east wall of the Casa Orinda building (as shown on page 40 of the ConnectOrinda Plan). This project includes funding for the community process of selecting qualified artists as well as partial funding for the murals. The intent is to use the city funding as seed money to be used as matching funds for community fundraising, Staff will outreach to the community groups for possible partnerships and potential philanthropic giving to fully fund the mural art desired by the community. Cost: $10,000

34. Vashell Way Pedestrian Activation

Description/Notes: Enhance Theatre District activity through transformation of Vashell Way into a part-time pedestrian alley. The project would include special paving, murals, lighting, and bollards (as detailed on pages 39-41 of the ConnectOrinda Plan). Potential funding could come from Measure RR and philanthropic community groups/community members. Cost: $250,000

196

TOP 10 PRIORITY LIST BIKEWAYS, TRAILS, and WALKWAYS (includes Crosswalks) BTW Relative Priority Project Name Description Lead Dept. Funding Length (mi) Proj. ID Cost Miner Road Path (portion of project Design and construction of pathway on Miner Road from Camino Pablo to Lombardy Lane. Public Works J.10 Gas Tax $$$ 1.5 Completed #4071) Includes shoulder pavement widening to provide additional space for pedestrians/cyclists.

Downtown Wayfinding Signage (project Install wayfinding signage that directs cyclists and pedestrians to popular destinations in Public Works M CCTA TLC $$ Completed #0023) Downtown and the Village. Grant Moraga Way / Brookside Road Stripe a white transverse crosswalk across north leg. Includes pedestrian actuated warning Public Works G MTC TDA $ Completed Intersection Improvements (project device or stop light. Grant #4137) Camino Pablo / Monte Vista Road Install ADA compliant ramps and stripe high visibility crosswalks. Install speed feedback signs Public Works B Trans. $ Scheduled Intersection Improvements (portion of approximately 1000 feet north and south of this intersection. Impact (2021‐2022) project #4150) Fees Martha Road / Catherine Court Walkway Stripe shoulder for pedestrians on eastbound Martha Road from the school parking lot Public Works 30 Trans. $$$ 0.3 (project #4140) entrance to the west end of the roadway. Consider parking restrictions during school commute In Progress Impact times. Pave, and reconstruct where necessary, existing path between Catherine Court and Martha Road. Fees (TIF) North Glorietta Blvd. Shoulder Striping Stripe shoulder from Robert Road to Martha Road (completed) and construct a four foot wide Public Works 29 CCTA TLC $$$ 0.6 walkway (will be created by constructing asphalt berm to separate from traffic lanes, as part Completed Grant of project #4131) between Daryl Drive and Martha Road.

#1 Camino Pablo Pathway Rehabilitation Replace existing asphalt walkway to improve smoothness and address ADA compliance for Public Works N/A Gas Tax, $$$$$ 1.1 slope and ramp placement TIF #2 Estabueno Drive / Lavenida Drive Stripe shoulder for pedestrian use on east side of Estabueno Drive from Lavenida Drive to the Public Works 38 TIF, SRTS $$ Walkway north end of Estabueno Drive. May require parking restrictions. Install pedestrian warning signage and crosswalk at intersection.

#3 East Altarinda Walkway Extend existing walkway on south side from Orinda Woods Drive to St. Stephens Drive. Public Works 9 Gas Tax, $$$ 0.2 TIF, TDA #4 San Pablo Creek Trail Construct dirt/gravel path along San Pablo Creek in Orinda Village (downtown area) from Santa Parks & Rec 14 Creek $$$$$ Maria Way to Camino Sobrante. grants #5 South Glorietta Boulevard Striping and Pave and stripe shoulder to maximum width on eastbound Glorietta Boulevard from Moraga Public Works 27 TDA, SRTS $$$ 0.8 Shoulder Widening Way to Martha Road. #6 Camino Pablo / Brookwood Road Construct bulb‐out with ADA compliant pedestrian landing pad on the southeast corner (tight Public Works E Gas Tax, $$ Intersection Improvements angle) of intersection. Install ADA compliant pedestrian pushbuttons on the southeast corner TIF and on the island at the northeast corner. Relocate existing crosswalk on northbound Orinda Way to connect the recommended bulb‐out to existing island to the northeast corner of the intersection. Construct ADA compliant curb ramps on the bulb‐out and island. Retime pedestrian crossing time to allow 2.8 feet/second at the Orinda Way (S) and Altarinda intersection. Construct a pedestrian bridge across San Pablo Creek, adjacent to the existing bridge.

#7 Brookwood Road Walkway Clear vegetation to provide a walkable shoulder on the north side of Brookwood Road where Public Works 18 TDA, TLC $$$$ 0.4 needed. Construct a decomposed granite path on the north side of Brookwood Road where shoulder does not exist. #8 Camino Sobrante Walkway Construct a walkway on Camino Sobrante from Orinda Way to Lake Cascade. Public Works 6 Gas Tax, $$ 0.6 TIF, TDA #9 Ivy Drive Walkway Construct walkway on one side of Ivy Drive for entire length. Consider replacing one side of on‐ Public Works 40 SRTS $$$$ 0.7 street parking with the walkway. #10 Lake Cascade Path Construct a pedestrian path around Lake Cascade. Public Works 8 N/A $$$ 1.2

Yellow highlighted projects are in progress or scheduled 197

Bikeways, Trails, and Walkways Master Plan BIKEWAYS Grey Highlighted Projects Yellow Highlighted Projects are in progress or scheduled Unfunded projects have no highlighting are complete Readiness BTW L‐ Low CIP or Top 10 list Project Name Description Lead Dept. Length (mi) Proj. ID M‐ Medium O/M* H‐ High Miner Road/ Honey Hill Road Bicycle Route Signed bicycle route from Camino Pablo to Honey Hill Road. Install speed feedback signs on south and Public Works 3 H CIP 2.8 northbound Miner Road. Install Share the Road sign (CAMUTCD W16‐1) or Bicycles May Use Full Lane sign (Federal MUTCD R4‐11) immediately north of the Camino Pablo intersection.

Camino Pablo / BART Undercrossing (Orinda Stripe Class II bike lanes Provide sharrows on Camino Pablo from Brookwood Road to Santa Maria Public Works 17 M CIP 0.4 Gateway Improvements) Way addressing Highway 24 on and off ramp conflict zones Camino Pablo Bikeway Improvements Restripe northbound lane between Orinda Way and Miner Road, providing bike pockets at Public Works 4 L CIP 0.7 intersections and widening bike lane to five feet where possible Ivy Drive Bicycle Route Signed bike route with sharrows (shared use pavement arrows) on Ivy Drive from Miramonte High Public Works 41 M CIP 1.2 School to Moraga Way and the entire length east of Moraga Way. Consider speed feedback signs on both directions of Ivy Drive between Coral and Arroyo Drives. Conduct targeted speed enforcement to determine most effective sign installation location. Any improvements should consider existing signage and reducing sign clutter on Ivy Drive. (Unsuccessful in 2019 TDA grant funding due in part to speed sign being major component)

El Nido Ranch Bicycle Route Signed bicycle route on El Nido Ranch Road from Lafayette/Orinda border to St. Stephens Drive. Public Works 11 H CIP 0.4

St. Stephens Drive / Via Las Cruces Bicycle Signed bicycle route from Via Las Cruces to St. Stephens Trail. Signed bicycle route from St. Stephens Public Works 10 H CIP 0.7 Route Drive to Honey Hill Road Glorietta Blvd. Bike Route Signed bicycle route on Glorietta Blvd. from Moraga Way to Lafayette/Orinda border. Consider Public Works 28 H CIP 1.4 feedback signs on both directions of Glorietta Boulevard in advance of Martha Road. (Not included in cost) Rheem Boulevard Bike Route Signed bicycle route from Glorietta Blvd. to eastern city limit. Install "Share the Road" (CAMUTCD Public Works 32 H CIP 1.1 W16‐1) or "Bicycles May Use Full Lane" sign (Federal MUTCD R4‐11) immediately east of the Glorietta Blvd. Intersection. Overhill Road / Tara Road / Southwood Drive Signed bicycle route on Overhill Road from Glorietta Blvd. to Tara Road, along Tara Road to Public Works 21 M CIP 1.4 Bicycle Route Southwood Drive, along Southwood Drive to Moraga Way Orchard Road Bicycle Route and Pedestrian Signed bicycle route on the entire length of Orchard Road (on both sides of Glorietta Blvd). Consider Public Works 25 M CIP 1.4 Signage installing pedestrian warning signage in addition to bicycle route signage.

Moraga Way Bike Lane Improvements Restrict parking along segments of Moraga Way where parked vehicles block bicycle lanes. Parking on Public Works 26 M O/M 1.4 Moraga Way adjacent to Miramonte High School was established by request of neighbors in Orinda and Moraga, and should not be removed at this time.

* CIP ‐ CIP project/requires design work O/M ‐ operations/maintenance work not requiring design

198

Bikeways, Trails, and Walkways Master Plan TRAILS Grey Highlighted Projects Yellow Highlighted Projects are in progress or scheduled Unfunded projects have no highlighting are complete Readiness BTW L‐ Low CIP or Top 10 List Project Name Description Lead Dept. Length (mi) Proj. ID M‐ Medium O/M* H‐ High Washington Lane / Bear Creek Road Trail Use existing fire road that connects Washington Lane to Bear Creek Road; Consider connections Parks & Rec 1 M CIP 1.2 to the EBMUD Orsan Trail on the north side of Bear Creek Road, and connection the Briones and San Pablo Reservoirs. Wilder/ Downtown Class I Multi‐Use Paved, ten foot wide path connecting the northwest end of the Wilder Development to Parks & Rec J.11 L CIP Path Brookwood Road. This path will run adjacent to the south side of Highway 24.

Miner Road Path (portion from Camino Design and construction of pathway on Miner Road from Camino Pablo to Lombardy Lane. Public Works J.10 L CIP 1.5 Pablo to Camino Don Miguel done in Includes shoulder pavement widening to provide additional space for pedestrians/cyclists. project #4071, 2019)

San Pablo Creek Trail Construct dirt/gravel path along San Pablo Creek in Orinda Village (downtown area) from Santa Parks & Rec  14 M CIP 0.4 Maria Way to Camino Sobrante. Village Grove ‐ Siesta Valley Trail Work with EBMUD to explore the construction of a trail from the Wilder Rd/Hwy 24 ramp to the Parks & Rec 13 L CIP 0.5 Laveaga Trail.  Lake Cascade Path Construct a pedestrian path around Lake Cascade. Parks & Rec 8 M CIP 0.6 Lamorinda to Redwood Trail Construct a soft surface trail along an unused utility ROW from east of the Rheem Blvd and city Parks & Rec J.9 M CIP limit intersection, through Orinda Oaks Park, across Moraga Way north of Ivy drive, and then connecting to the Robert Sibley Regional Volcanic Preserve trail.

Wanda Lane Trail Construct a trail connecting St. Stephen's Trail to Wanda Lane, approximately 200 feet north of Parks & Rec 12 L CIP 0.2 Muth Drive. * CIP ‐ CIP project/requires design work O/M ‐ operations/maintenance work not requiring design 199

Bart Path Access Ramp and Lighting Construct an ADA compliant ramp accessing the BART pedestrian undercrossing from Bryant Way. Public Works 15 L CIP 0 Improvements Install brighter, vandal‐proof lighting along BART path, particularly under the BART and Highway 24 overpasses. Downtown Wayfinding Signage (IN Install wayfinding signage that directs cyclists and pedestrians to popular destinations in Downtown Public Works M M CIP PROGRESS) and the Village. Coral Drive Walkway Construct walkway on one side of Coral Drive from Ivy Drive to Moraga Way. Public Works 39 L CIP 0.3 Coral Drive / Eastwood Drive Install advance crosswalk warning sign on eastbound Coral Drive at Eastwood Drive. Reposition Public Works K L CIP Intersection Improvements crosswalk across Coral Drive to be perpendicular to the curb face. Construct curb ramp at repositioned crosswalk end. Hillcrest Drive Walkway and Glorietta Construct a walkway on the west side of Hillcrest Drive. Requires undergrounding of the existing Public Works 31 L CIP 0.1 School ADA Ramp (NO LONGER drainage culvert from the Martha Road intersection, approximately 270 feet north. Replace the PURSUING DUE TO RESIDENT existing stairway at the school driveway across from Hillcrest Drive with an ADA compliant ramp. FEEDBACK) Estabueno Drive / Lavenida Drive Stripe shoulder for pedestrian use on east side of Estabueno Drive from Lavenida Drive to the north Public Works 38 L O/M 0.2  Walkway end of Estabueno Drive. May require parking restrictions. Install pedestrian warning signage and crosswalk at intersection. Ivy Drive Walkway Construct walkway on one side of Ivy Drive for entire length. Consider replacing one side of on‐street Public Works  40 L CIP 0.7 parking with the walkway. Camino Pablo / Brookwood Road Replace existing crosswalks with high‐visibility crosswalks. Consider raised crosswalk or special Public Works EL Intersection Improvements pavers across Brookwood Road as it enters Theater Square. Evaluate for leading pedestrian interval. (Completed‐ Construct curb ramps at freeway off ramp and Brookwood Road.) Construct bulbout/narrow turning radius at southeast corner of Brookwood Road / Camino Pablo. Conduct  traffic study to determine if northbound Moraga Way / Camino Pablo requires three through lanes, and if possible reduce road width. (Completed ‐ Install ADA accessible pedestrian push buttons.

 Camino Sobrante Walkway Construct a walkway on Camino Sobrante from Orinda Way to Lake Cascade. Public Works 6 L CIP 0.6 Camino Pablo / Monte Vista Road Install ADA compliant ramps and stripe high visibility crosswalks. Install speed feedback signs Public Works B M CIP Intersection Improvements approximately 1000 feet north and south of this intersection. Brookwood Road Walkway Clear vegetation to provide a walkable shoulder on the north side of Brookwood Road where Public Works 18 L CIP 0.4  needed. Construct a decomposed granite path on the north side of Brookwood Road where shoulder does not exist. Moraga Way / Estabueno Drive Install school‐area pedestrian warning signage. Evaluate for pedestrian‐actuated beacon or stop Public Works J H O/M Intersection Improvements light. (Not included in cost) North Glorietta Blvd. Shoulder Striping Stripe shoulder from Robert Road to Martha Road and construct a four foot wide walkway between Public Works 29 L CIP 0.6 Daryl Drive and Martha Road. South Glorietta Boulevard Striping and Pave and stripe shoulder to maximum width on eastbound Glorietta Boulevard from Moraga Way to Public Works 27 L CIP 0.8 Shoulder Widening Martha Road. Camino Pablo / Orinda Way (N) Construct bulb‐out with ADA compliant pedestrian landing pad on the southeast corner (tight angle) Public Works C L CIP Intersection Improvements and of intersection. Install ADA compliant pedestrian pushbuttons on the southeast corner and on the Pedestrian Bridge island at the northeast corner. Relocate existing crosswalk on northbound Orinda Way to connect the recommended bulb‐out to existing island to the northeast corner of the intersection. Construct ADA compliant curb ramps on the bulb‐out and island. Retime pedestrian crossing time to allow 2.8 feet/second at the Orinda Way (S) and Altarinda intersection. Construct a pedestrian bridge across San Pablo Creek, adjacent to the existing bridge.

Sleepy Hollow Lane / Washington Lane Install thermoplastic hatching on the northwest corner and advanced stop bar and in‐pavement Public Works A M CIP Intersection Improvements pedestrian paddle on the westbound approach of the intersection.

Moraga Creek Bridge Construct pedestrian bridge across Moraga Creek from Moraga Way to Miramonte High School Public Works 43 L CIP 0 grounds (near the tennis courts). Moraga Way / Hall Drive Intersection Stripe high visibility crosswalk across Moraga Way, install advance pedestrian warning signage. Public Works H M CIP Improvements Evaluate for pedestrian actuated beacon or traffic signal. (Not included in cost)

Moraga Way / Whitehall Drive Stripe yellow ladder crosswalk across northwest leg and associated pedestrian warning signage. Public Works I M CIP Intersection Improvements Moraga Way / Ivy Drive Intersection Retime signal to 2.8 feet per second. Install truncated domes on all corners. Construct pedestrian Public Works L M CIP Improvements landing pad on the southwest corner. Sleepy Hollow Lane/ Tarry Lane/ Clear vegetation to provide a walkable shoulder on one side of all roadways. Public Works 2 M O/M 0.5 Lombardy Lane Walkway Woodland Road Walkway Clear vegetation to provide a walkable shoulder from Valley View Drive to Moraga Way. Public Works 34 L O/M 0.2

Davis Road Walkway Clear vegetation to provide a walkable shoulder from Northwood Drive and Vashell Way. Public Works 20 L O/M 0.3

El Toyonal / Wagner Ranch Walkway Clear vegetation to provide walkable shoulder from Camino Pablo to swim club. Public Works 5 L O/M 0.5

Donna Maria Connector Path Construct a decomposed granite path from the end of Donna Maria Way to Adobe Lane. Parks & Rec 36 L CIP 0.1

Camino Encinas Walkway Clear vegetation to provide a walkable shoulder along entire length. Public Works 24 L O/M 0.5 Martha Road / Catherine Court Stripe shoulder for pedestrians on eastbound Martha Road from the school parking lot entrance to Public Works 30 L CIP 0.3 Walkway the west end of the roadway. Consider parking restrictions during school commute times. Pave, and reconstruct where necessary, existing path between Catherine Court and Martha Road.

La Cresta Road Walkway Clear vegetation to provide a walkable shoulder from Don Gabriel Way to Woodland Road. Public Works 37 L O/M 0.6 200

Bikeways, Trails, and Walkways Master Plan WALKWAYS Grey Highlighted Projects Yellow Highlighted Projects are in progress or scheduled Unfunded projects have no highlighting are complete Readiness BTW L‐ Low CIP or Top 10 List Project Name Description Lead Dept. Length (mi) Proj. ID M‐ Medium O/M* H‐ High Don Gabriel Way Walkway Extend existing walkway on northeast side of Don Gabriel Way from La Cresta Road to Valley View Public Works 35 L CIP 0.2 Drive. Construct ADA‐compliant curb ramp on southeast corner of Don Gabriel Way and Valley View Drive intersection. Moraga Way / Brookside Road Stripe a white transverse crosswalk across north leg. Evaluate for pedestrian actuated warning device Public Works G M CIP Intersection Improvements or stop light. (Not included in cost) Moraga Way / Camino Encinas Paint white ladder crosswalk across northwest leg. Evaluate for pedestrian actuated beacon or stop Public Works F M CIP Intersection Improvements light. (Not included in cost) Camino Pablo / Orinda Way (S) Retime pedestrian crossing time to allow 2.8 feet/second. (Part of project C) Public Works D H O/M Intersection Improvements Village Mid‐Block Connection Construct ADA Ramp to Rite Aid parking lot. Work with merchants to provide clear pedestrian path Public Works 16 L CIP 0.1 across parking lot, for example, striping ladder crosswalk. Southwood Road Walkway Construct a decomposed granite path on one side of Southwood Road from Tara Road to Moraga Public Works 19 L CIP 0.3 Way. East Altarinda Walkway Extend existing walkway on south side from Orinda Woods Drive to St. Stephens Drive. Public Works  9 L CIP 0.2 Valley View Drive Walkway Construct decomposed granite path from Don Gabriel Way to Moraga Way. Public Works 33 L CIP 0.6 Tara/Overhill Walkway Construct a decomposed granite path from Glorietta Blvd. to Southwood Drive. Parks & Rec 22 L CIP 1.3 Bates Blvd Signage and Striping Stripe shoulders for pedestrian use from Davis to Warford Terrace. Install pedestrian warning signage Public Works 23 M CIP 1 on southbound Bates Blvd. immediately after the Warford Terrace and Muth Drive intersections and on northbound Bates Blvd. immediately after the Davis Road and Warford Terrace intersections.

* CIP ‐ CIP project/requires design work O/M ‐ operations/maintenance work not requiring design 201

III. FINANCIAL SUMMARY

202 City of Orinda, California Capital Improvement Plan

'19/'20thru '23/'24

SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS

Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

100 General Fund

Beginning Balance 00000

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue Gen Fund City Hall Water Leak #1710 80,000 0 0 0 0 Gen Fund Library Boiler #4144 16,405 0 0 0 0 Gen Fund Police Command Vehcicle (#0020) 7,500 0 0 0 0

Total 103,905 0 0 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 103,905 0 0 0 0

Total Funds Available 103,905 0 0 0 0

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment CITY MANAGER Fleet Replacements 0020 (7,500) 0 0 0 0

Total (7,500) 0 0 0 0 PARKS & RECREATION City Hall Water Leak 1710 (80,000) 0 0 0 0 Library Boiler Piping Replacement 4144 (16,405) 0 0 0 0

Total (96,405) 0 0 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (103,905) 0 0 0 0

Change in Fund Balance 00000

Ending Balance 00000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 203 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

105 Orinda Add-On Sales Tax (L)

Beginning Balance 2,524,244 3,489,906 2,331,350 803,350 381,850

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4105 - Sales Tax Add-On 1,200,000 1,170,000 1,230,000 952,500 0 4110 - Interest 45,000 10,000 5,000 1,000 0 4790 - Project Reimbursement Revenue 482,500 0 0 0 0

Total 1,727,500 1,180,000 1,235,000 953,500 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 1,727,500 1,180,000 1,235,000 953,500 0

Total Funds Available 4,251,744 4,669,906 3,566,350 1,756,850 381,850

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS Miner Rd Pavement Rehab & Shoulder Widening 4071 (24,388) 0 0 0 0 2019 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4119/4120 (687,450) (620,000) 0 0 0 Green Infrastructure Program for Pavement 4146 0 (25,000) (35,000) (30,000) (30,000) Projects Lavenida Culvert Repair 4148 (50,000) (165,000) 0 0 0 2020 Annual Pavement Project 4150 0 (976,556) 0 0 0 Camino Sobrante at Golf Course Slide Stabilization 4152 0 0 (620,000) 0 0 Loma Vista Pavement Repair 4153 0 (55,000) (245,000) 0 0 2021 Annual Pavement Project 4155 0 0 (1,265,000) 0 0 Pavement Rehab - El Toyonal, Oak Flat, La Espiral 4165 0 (497,000) (403,000) 0 0 2022 Annual Pavement Project 4166 0 0 (195,000) (1,150,000) 0 2023 Annual Paving Project 4171 0 0 0 (195,000) (300,000)

Total (761,838) (2,338,556) (2,763,000) (1,375,000) (330,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (761,838) (2,338,556) (2,763,000) (1,375,000) (330,000)

Change in Fund Balance 965,662 (1,158,556) (1,528,000) (421,500) (330,000)

Ending Balance 3,489,906 2,331,350 803,350 381,850 51,850

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 204 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

200 Gas Tax

Beginning Balance 1,066,548 568,302 292,665 337,965 441,165

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110 Interest 11,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4190 - Local Partnership Pgm (LPP) Funding Cycle 300,000 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 4707 - Rd Maint Rehab Acct (RMRA) 320,000 330,000 345,000 355,000 365,000 4999 - Other Revenue 21,895 0 0 0 0 Gas Tax Sections 2103-2107 425,500 448,000 454,500 461,000 467,000

Total 1,078,395 783,000 1,004,500 1,021,000 1,037,000

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 1,078,395 783,000 1,004,500 1,021,000 1,037,000

Total Funds Available 2,144,943 1,351,302 1,297,165 1,358,965 1,478,165

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS Bear Creek Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0087 (23,440) (36,560) 0 0 0 Miner Rd Pavement Rehab & Shoulder Widening 4071 (320,867) 0 0 0 0 ADA Transition Plan Compliance (Roadway) 4074 (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) Traffic Calming Improvements Program 4107 (1,000) (30,000) (30,000) (30,000) (30,000) 2019 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4119/4120 (801,265) 0 0 0 0 Glorietta Elementary Safe Route to School 4131 (99,500) 0 0 0 0 Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation 4138 (10,000) (60,000) (50,000) 0 0 2020 Annual Pavement Project 4150 0 (425,000) 0 0 0 Brookwood Culvert Repair 4151 (29,150) 0 0 0 0 Camino Sobrante at Golf Course Slide Stabilization 4152 (25,000) (55,000) 0 0 0 2021 Annual Pavement Project 4155 0 (195,000) (600,000) 0 0 2022 Annual Pavement Project 4166 0 0 0 (600,000) 0 2023 Annual Paving Project 4171 0000(650,000)

Total (1,360,222) (851,560) (730,000) (680,000) (730,000) Other Uses Operations - Traffic Signal & Guardrail Maint (70,000) (70,000) (71,100) (75,000) (77,000) Sr Engineer 80% (Salary / Benefits) (146,419) (137,077) (158,100) (162,800) (168,000)

Total (216,419) (207,077) (229,200) (237,800) (245,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (1,576,641) (1,058,637) (959,200) (917,800) (975,000)

Change in Fund Balance (498,246) (275,637) 45,300 103,200 62,000

Ending Balance 568,302 292,665 337,965 441,165 503,165

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 205 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

205 Transportation Impact Fees

Beginning Balance 957,432 926,687 800,327 663,627 691,127

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110 - Interest 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4701 - Transp Impact Fee 30,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000

Total 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000

Total Funds Available 1,002,432 971,687 845,327 708,627 736,127

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS Downtown and BART Wayfinding 0023 (56,604) 0 0 0 0 Miner Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0044 (17,000) (20,000) 0 0 0 Annual Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways Program 4109 (1,000) (17,500) (17,500) (17,500) (17,500) Martha Rd-Catherine Ct Ped Path 4140 (1,141) (38,860) 0 0 0 2020 Annual Pavement Project 4150 0 (45,000) 0 0 0 Ped Path MoragaWy ECM to Altam 4168 0 0 (164,200) 0 0 Ped Xing Improvement Glorietta at Virginia 4172 0 (50,000) 0 0 0

Total (75,745) (171,360) (181,700) (17,500) (17,500)

Total Expenditures and Uses (75,745) (171,360) (181,700) (17,500) (17,500)

Change in Fund Balance (30,745) (126,360) (136,700) 27,500 27,500

Ending Balance 926,687 800,327 663,627 691,127 718,627

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 206 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

210 Drainage Impact Fees

Beginning Balance 1,456,618 1,350,618 1,127,618 852,618 29,218

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110- Interest 20,000 10,000 5,000 500 500 4702 - Drainage Impact Fee 235,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

Total 255,000 160,000 155,000 150,500 150,500

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 255,000 160,000 155,000 150,500 150,500

Total Funds Available 1,711,618 1,510,618 1,282,618 1,003,118 179,718

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS Storm Drain Plan & Inventory 4092 (66,000) (100,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) Storm Drain Liner Ivy Dr (48in) 4094 0 (40,000) (130,000) 0 0 Annual Drainage Facilities Improvement Program 4111 (90,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (120,000) 2020 Stormdrain Improvement 4162 (205,000) 0 0 0 0 Storm Drain Moraga Wy & Coral 4167 0 (93,000) (100,000) (773,900) 0

Total (361,000) (383,000) (430,000) (973,900) (170,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (361,000) (383,000) (430,000) (973,900) (170,000)

Change in Fund Balance (106,000) (223,000) (275,000) (823,400) (19,500)

Ending Balance 1,350,618 1,127,618 852,618 29,218 9,718

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 207 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

240 Park Dedication Fees

Beginning Balance 1,185,953 1,231,798 532,298 217,298 217,298

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110 - Interest 19,000 3,000 0 0 0 4703 - Park Dedication Fees 100,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 90,000

Total 119,000 83,000 85,000 90,000 90,000

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 119,000 83,000 85,000 90,000 90,000

Total Funds Available 1,304,953 1,314,798 617,298 307,298 307,298

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PARKS & RECREATION Community Center Window Replacement 4016 0 0 (85,000) 0 0 Community Center HVAC 4050 0 (50,000) 0 0 0 Resurface Community Park Tennis Courts 4052 (17,450) (192,500) 0 0 0 Wilder Park Field#4 Synthetic Turf 4061 0 (75,000) 0 0 0 Community Center Accessibility Improvements 4086 (10,000) (100,000) (25,000) (25,000) (25,000) Mini Park (Crossroads Park) 4103 (10,000) (75,000) 0 0 0 Community Park Renovation Plan & Improvements 4112 0 (215,000) (275,000) 0 0 Community Center Roof Replacement 4141 0 (75,000) 0 0 0 Community Park Pathway Improvement 4142 (24,877) 0 0 0 0 Fire Sprinkler Compliance and Repair 4156 (6,145) 0 0 0 0 Replace Pump and Filter for Library Fountain 4157 (4,683) 0 0 0 0

Total (73,155) (782,500) (385,000) (25,000) (25,000) PUBLIC WORKS St. Stephens Trail and Drainage Improvements 4068 0 0 (15,000) (65,000) 0

Total 0 0 (15,000) (65,000) 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (73,155) (782,500) (400,000) (90,000) (25,000)

Change in Fund Balance 45,845 (699,500) (315,000) 0 65,000

Ending Balance 1,231,798 532,298 217,298 217,298 282,298

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 208 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

255 Grants: Federal

Beginning Balance 3,627 0 0 0 0

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4357-Fed Grant Hwy Bridge (#0044) 133,000 417,000 71,000 0 0 4357-Fed Grant Hwy Bridge (#0087) 176,560 818,440 212,000 0 0 4357-Fed Grant Orinda Wy (#4138) 0 380,000 270,000 0 0

Total 309,560 1,615,440 553,000 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 309,560 1,615,440 553,000 0 0

Total Funds Available 313,187 1,615,440 553,000 0 0

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS Miner Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0044 (133,000) (417,000) (71,000) 0 0 Bear Creek Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0087 (176,560) (818,440) (212,000) 0 0 Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation 4138 0 (380,000) (270,000) 0 0

Total (309,560) (1,615,440) (553,000) 0 0 Other Uses Accounting Adjustment (3,627) 0 0 0 0

Total (3,627) 0 0 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (313,187) (1,615,440) (553,000) 0 0

Change in Fund Balance (3,627) 0 0 0 0

Ending Balance 00000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 209 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

260 Grants: State

Beginning Balance 0 217,551 0 0 0

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4225-State Transportation Grant Prop 1B (#0044) 0 35,000 9,000 0 0 4225-State Transportation Grant Prop 1B (#0087) 0 70,000 28,000 0 0 4358-State Grant OES PSPS (#4164) 217,551 0 0 0 0 4358-State HCD Development Grant (#4163) 0 205,000 20,000 0 0 4358-State Parks Grant Prop 68 (#4112) 0 0 200,000 0 0

Total 217,551 310,000 257,000 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 217,551 310,000 257,000 0 0

Total Funds Available 217,551 527,551 257,000 0 0

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PARKS & RECREATION Community Park Renovation Plan & Improvements 4112 0 0 (200,000) 0 0 Solar Back-Up Community Center 4164 0 (217,551) 0 0 0

Total 0 (217,551) (200,000) 0 0 PLANNING Downtown Precise Plan 4163 0 (205,000) (20,000) 0 0

Total 0 (205,000) (20,000) 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS Miner Road Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0044 0 (35,000) (9,000) 0 0 Bear Creek Bridge Seismic Retrofit 0087 0 (70,000) (28,000) 0 0

Total 0 (105,000) (37,000) 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses 0 (527,551) (257,000) 0 0

Change in Fund Balance 217,551 (217,551) 0 0 0

Ending Balance 217,551 0 0 0 0

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 210 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

262 Other Grants

Beginning Balance 00000

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4358 Grants East Bay Reg Pk District WW (#4061) 0 150,000 0 0 0 4420-Donations (Orinda Cmmty Foundation ) 0 235,000 0 0 0 (#4103) 4420-Donations (Pk Rec Fdn ) (#4112) 0 0 200,000 0 0 4790-Project Reimb (EBMUD#4071) 387,918 0 0 0 0

Total 387,918 385,000 200,000 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 387,918 385,000 200,000 0 0

Total Funds Available 387,918 385,000 200,000 0 0

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PARKS & RECREATION Wilder Park Field#4 Synthetic Turf 4061 0 (150,000) 0 0 0 Mini Park (Crossroads Park) 4103 0 (235,000) 0 0 0 Community Park Renovation Plan & Improvements 4112 0 0 (200,000) 0 0

Total 0 (385,000) (200,000) 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS Miner Rd Pavement Rehab & Shoulder Widening 4071 (387,918) 0 0 0 0

Total (387,918) 0 0 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (387,918) (385,000) (200,000) 0 0

Change in Fund Balance 00000

Ending Balance 00000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 211 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

263 Transportation Development Act (TDA)

Beginning Balance 00000

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4359-Grants Local TDA(#4128) 110,909 39,091 0 0 0 4359-Grants Local TDA(#4137) 65,000 0 0 0 0 4359-Grants Local TDA(#4168) 0 50,000 35,800 0 0

Total 175,909 89,091 35,800 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 175,909 89,091 35,800 0 0

Total Funds Available 175,909 89,091 35,800 0 0

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS Camino Pablo Bicycle Route Corridor 4128 (110,909) (39,091) 0 0 0 Improvements Moraga Way Crosswalk at Brookside Road 4137 (65,000) 0 0 0 0 Ped Path MoragaWy ECM to Altam 4168 0 (50,000) (35,800) 0 0

Total (175,909) (89,091) (35,800) 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (175,909) (89,091) (35,800) 0 0

Change in Fund Balance 00000

Ending Balance 00000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 212 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

330 CCTA Return To Source (Local Share)

Beginning Balance 688,708 1,183,156 731,786 737,136 588,436

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110-Interest 10,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 4310- CCTA 510,000 365,630 347,350 354,300 361,390

Total 520,000 368,630 350,350 356,300 362,390

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 520,000 368,630 350,350 356,300 362,390

Total Funds Available 1,208,708 1,551,786 1,082,136 1,093,436 950,826

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS 2019 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4119/4120 (25,552) 0 0 0 0 2020 Annual Pavement Project 4150 0 (820,000) 0 0 0 2021 Annual Pavement Project 4155 0 0 (345,000) 0 0 2022 Annual Pavement Project 4166 0 0 0 (505,000) 0 2023 Annual Paving Project 4171 0000(728,000)

Total (25,552) (820,000) (345,000) (505,000) (728,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (25,552) (820,000) (345,000) (505,000) (728,000)

Change in Fund Balance 494,448 (451,370) 5,350 (148,700) (365,610)

Ending Balance 1,183,156 731,786 737,136 588,436 222,826

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 213 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

331 CCTA Project Specific Grants

Beginning Balance 1,043 0 0 0 0

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4310- BART Wayfinding CCTA (#0023) 25,140 0 0 0 0 4310- Camino Pablo CCTA (#4128) 0 400,000 0 0 0 4310- Safe Route School CCTA (#4131) 313,550 0 0 0 0 4310-Streetscape Plan CCTA (#4130) 50,355 0 0 0 0

Total 389,045 400,000 0 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 389,045 400,000 0 0 0

Total Funds Available 390,088 400,000 0 0 0

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PLANNING Downtown Orinda Streetscape Master Plan 4130 (50,355) 0 0 0 0

Total (50,355) 0 0 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS Downtown and BART Wayfinding 0023 (25,140) 0 0 0 0 Camino Pablo Bicycle Route Corridor 4128 0 (400,000) 0 0 0 Improvements Glorietta Elementary Safe Route to School 4131 (313,550) 0 0 0 0

Total (338,690) (400,000) 0 0 0 Other Uses Transfer From Fund 331 to 330 Return To Source (1,043) 0 0 0 0

Total (1,043) 0 0 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (390,088) (400,000) 0 0 0

Change in Fund Balance (1,043) 0 0 0 0

Ending Balance 00000

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 214 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

332 CCTA Supplemental (28C)

Beginning Balance 34,497 56,877 52,277 46,497 41,167

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110-Interest 500 200 200 200 200 4310-CCTA 27,880 23,700 22,520 22,970 23,430

Total 28,380 23,900 22,720 23,170 23,630

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 28,380 23,900 22,720 23,170 23,630

Total Funds Available 62,877 80,777 74,997 69,667 64,797

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS Annual Bicycle, Trails, and Walkways Program 4109 0 (22,500) (22,500) (22,500) (22,500)

Total 0 (22,500) (22,500) (22,500) (22,500) Other Uses Regional Administration Fee (6,000) (6,000) (6,000) (6,000) (6,000)

Total (6,000) (6,000) (6,000) (6,000) (6,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (6,000) (28,500) (28,500) (28,500) (28,500)

Change in Fund Balance 22,380 (4,600) (5,780) (5,330) (4,870)

Ending Balance 56,877 52,277 46,497 41,167 36,297

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 215 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

335 Road Maint Fee (Solid Waste Provider)

Beginning Balance 586,124 666,399 346,761 808,761 567,261

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110-Interest 10,000 4,000 7,000 8,500 8,000 4233 Road Maint Fee (Garbage) 810,275 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 800,000

Total 820,275 1,054,000 1,057,000 1,058,500 808,000

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 820,275 1,054,000 1,057,000 1,058,500 808,000

Total Funds Available 1,406,399 1,720,399 1,403,761 1,867,261 1,375,261

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS 2019 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4119/4120 (425,000) (500,000) 0 0 0 2020 Annual Pavement Project 4150 (315,000) (873,638) 0 0 0 2021 Annual Pavement Project 4155 0 0 (595,000) 0 0 2022 Annual Pavement Project 4166 0 0 0 (1,300,000) 0 2023 Annual Paving Project 4171 0 0 0 0 (1,127,000)

Total (740,000) (1,373,638) (595,000) (1,300,000) (1,127,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (740,000) (1,373,638) (595,000) (1,300,000) (1,127,000)

Change in Fund Balance 80,275 (319,638) 462,000 (241,500) (319,000)

Ending Balance 666,399 346,761 808,761 567,261 248,261

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 216 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

340 Wilder Community Maint. Endowment

Beginning Balance 1,410,014 1,374,244 324,244 326,244 328,244

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue Interest 25,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 0

Total 25,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 25,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 0

Total Funds Available 1,435,014 1,376,244 326,244 328,244 328,244

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment CITY MANAGER Fleet Replacements 0020 (8,270) 0 0 0 0

Total (8,270) 0 0 0 0 PARKS & RECREATION Wilder Fields 1&2 Turf Replacement 4013 0 (1,000,000) 0 0 0 Fencing & Gate Wilder Field 4 4018 0 (37,000) 0 0 0 Art and Garden Center Sound Absorption 4113 (25,000) (15,000) 0 0 0

Total (25,000) (1,052,000) 0 0 0 Other Uses Developer Park Improvements Per DA (10,500) 0 0 0 0 Operating Budget Expense - Parking Lot Lights (15,000) 0 0 0 0 Park Signage (2,000) 0 0 0 0

Total (27,500) 0 0 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (60,770) (1,052,000) 0 0 0

Change in Fund Balance (35,770) (1,050,000) 2,000 2,000 0

Ending Balance 1,374,244 324,244 326,244 328,244 328,244

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 217 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

520 Library Parcel Tax

Beginning Balance 125,986 174,563 133,661 55,282 70,058

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4100 - Parcel Taxes 520,100 520,928 521,756 522,101 522,377 4110 - Interest 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Total 522,100 521,928 522,756 523,101 523,377

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 522,100 521,928 522,756 523,101 523,377

Total Funds Available 648,086 696,491 656,417 578,383 593,435

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PARKS & RECREATION Library Boiler Piping Replacement 4144 (92,963) 0 0 0 0 Fire Sprinkler Compliance and Repair 4156 (3,000) 0 0 0 0 Library Boiler Replacement 4161 0 (63,750) 0 0 0 Library Roof Replacement 4173 0 (72,250) 0 0 0 Replace Library Air Handlers 4174 0 0 (161,500) 0 0 Library Painting (Ext. & Interior) 4175 0 0 0 (55,500) 0

Total (95,963) (136,000) (161,500) (55,500) 0 Other Uses Library Op Cost Without Capital (377,560) (426,830) (439,635) (452,825) (466,400)

Total (377,560) (426,830) (439,635) (452,825) (466,400)

Total Expenditures and Uses (473,523) (562,830) (601,135) (508,325) (466,400)

Change in Fund Balance 48,577 (40,902) (78,379) 14,776 56,977

Ending Balance 174,563 133,661 55,282 70,058 127,035

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 218 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

603 Building Maintenance (ISF)

Beginning Balance 588,058 695,378 627,318 658,438 715,378

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue No Funds 00000 4110 - Interest 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4899 - Charges for Indirect Costs 194,320 155,940 160,620 165,440 170,000

Total 204,320 160,940 165,620 170,440 175,000

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 204,320 160,940 165,620 170,440 175,000

Total Funds Available 792,378 856,318 792,938 828,878 890,378

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PARKS & RECREATION City Hall Elevator 4145 0 (20,000) 0 0 0 Install Mini Split HVAC System at Orinda Library 4160 0 (30,000) 0 0 0 Library Boiler Replacement 4161 0 (11,250) 0 0 0 Library Roof Replacement 4173 0 (12,750) 0 0 0 Replace Library Air Handlers 4174 0 0 (28,500) 0 0 Library Painting (Ext. & Interior) 4175 0 0 0 (4,500) 0

Total 0 (74,000) (28,500) (4,500) 0 PUBLIC WORKS City Hall Slide Stabilization 4108 (5,000) (35,000) 0 0 0

Total (5,000) (35,000) 0 0 0 Other Uses Annual Operating Expenditures (Repairs / Equip) (92,000) (120,000) (106,000) (109,000) (113,000)

Total (92,000) (120,000) (106,000) (109,000) (113,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (97,000) (229,000) (134,500) (113,500) (113,000)

Change in Fund Balance 107,320 (68,060) 31,120 56,940 62,000

Ending Balance 695,378 627,318 658,438 715,378 777,378

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 219 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

605 Vehicle Replacement (ISF)

Beginning Balance 372,747 575,057 495,057 528,557 587,057

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110 - Interest 10,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 4146 - Sale of Salvaged Equip 1,500 3,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 4899 Replacement Charges 255,010 80,000 165,000 170,000 175,000

Total 266,510 85,000 168,500 173,500 178,500

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 266,510 85,000 168,500 173,500 178,500

Total Funds Available 639,257 660,057 663,557 702,057 765,557

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment CITY MANAGER Fleet Replacements 0020 (64,200) (165,000) (135,000) (115,000) (120,000)

Total (64,200) (165,000) (135,000) (115,000) (120,000)

Total Expenditures and Uses (64,200) (165,000) (135,000) (115,000) (120,000)

Change in Fund Balance 202,310 (80,000) 33,500 58,500 58,500

Ending Balance 575,057 495,057 528,557 587,057 645,557

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 220 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

612 General & Long Term Plans

Beginning Balance 651,359 798,974 419,481 347,731 350,731

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110 - Interest 4,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 5101 - Transfer In From General Fund 200,000 0 0 0 0

Total 204,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 204,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000

Total Funds Available 855,359 800,974 422,481 350,731 353,731

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PLANNING Downtown Precise Plan 4163 (20,000) (225,860) (34,000) 0 0

Total (20,000) (225,860) (34,000) 0 0 Other Uses Staffing Project Mgr (Project #4163) (36,385) (155,633) (40,750) 0 0

Total (36,385) (155,633) (40,750) 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (56,385) (381,493) (74,750) 0 0

Change in Fund Balance 147,615 (379,493) (71,750) 3,000 3,000

Ending Balance 798,974 419,481 347,731 350,731 353,731

2020-2024 CIP Thursday, July 16, 2020 221 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

700 Capital Improvement (General)

Beginning Balance 492,147 2,365,635 1,149,135 359,135 234,135

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4190 - Misc Revenue (Miner Rd Sinkhole Grant) 2,245,993 0 0 0 0 4190 - Misc Revenue (Moraga) 17,500 0 0 0 0 4358 - CalOES (Miner Rd Sinkhole) 230,636 0 0 0 0 General Fund Contribution El Toyonal EVA Bridge 50,002 0 0 0 0

Total 2,544,131 0 0 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 2,544,131 0 0 0 0

Total Funds Available 3,036,278 2,365,635 1,149,135 359,135 234,135

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PARKS & RECREATION Sewer Line Community Center 4017 0 (50,000) 0 0 0 Community Center Roof Replacement 4141 0 (200,000) 0 0 0 Solar Back-Up Community Center 4164 0 (100,000) 0 0 0

Total 0 (350,000) 0 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS El Toyonal EVA Bridge Rehabilitation 0067 (50,002) 0 0 0 0 City Hall Slide Stabilization 4108 0 (605,000) (245,000) 0 0 Annual Drainage Facilities Improvement Program 4111 (47,321) (125,000) (125,000) (125,000) (125,000) 2018 Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4118/4132 (3,320) 0 0 0 0 Martha Rd-Catherine Ct Ped Path 4140 0 0 (420,000) 0 0 Crosswalk Orindawoods KiteHill 4169 0 (75,000) 0 0 0 Drainage Impvt 25 La Cuesta 4170 0 (31,500) 0 0 0 Washington Ln. Widening Study 4176 0 (30,000) 0 0 0

Total (100,643) (866,500) (790,000) (125,000) (125,000) Other Uses Mid-Year Transfer One - Time To Info - Technology (40,000) 0 0 0 0 Mid-Year Transfer One - Time To ISF Buildings (40,000) 0 0 0 0 Mid-Year Transfer One - Time To ISF Fleet (100,000) 0 0 0 0 Mid-Year Transfer One - Time To ISF Risk (100,000) 0 0 0 0 Mid-Year Transfer One-Time #612 General Plan (200,000) 0 0 0 0 Fund Mid-Year Transfer One-Time General Fund (80,000) 0 0 0 0 Project #4132 - City Admin Charge For Moraga (10,000) 0 0 0 0

Total (570,000) 0 0 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (670,643) (1,216,500) (790,000) (125,000) (125,000)

Change in Fund Balance 1,873,488 (1,216,500) (790,000) (125,000) (125,000)

Ending Balance 2,365,635 1,149,135 359,135 234,135 109,135

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 222 Source '19/'20 '20/'21 '21/'22 '22/'23 '23/'24

741 GO Bond 2016 (L)

Beginning Balance 13,422,241 3,332,198 0 0 0

Revenues and Other Fund Sources Revenue 4110 Interest 135,000 7,393 0 0 0 4790 Project Reimbursements (Utilities) 33,595 0 0 0 0

Total 168,595 7,393 0 0 0

Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 168,595 7,393 0 0 0

Total Funds Available 13,590,836 3,339,591 0 0 0

Expenditures and Uses Capital Projects & Equipment PUBLIC WORKS 2019 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehab 4119/4120 (10,071,485) 0 0 0 0 2020 Annual Pavement Project 4150 0 (3,151,161) 0 0 0

Total (10,071,485) (3,151,161) 0 0 0 Other Uses Paving Mgr (Salary/Benefits / Ins Alloc) (187,153) (188,430) 0 0 0

Total (187,153) (188,430) 0 0 0

Total Expenditures and Uses (10,258,638) (3,339,591) 0 0 0

Change in Fund Balance (10,090,043) (3,332,198) 0 0 0

Ending Balance 3,332,198 0 0 0 0

2020-2024 CIP Tuesday, July 14, 2020 223

IV. APPENDICES

224 225 226

FUND SOURCES

Capital Fund – Fund created to account for transactions related to capital improvement projects. The funding for these expenditures is typically received through interfund transfers from the City’s General Fund. Capital funding consists of remaining General Fund balances from closed projects.

CCTA Program 28c – Fund is administered by CCTA for projects/programs identified in the Countywide Measure J sales tax Expenditure Plan for the southwest subregion of Contra Costa County. It allows each subregion to proposed projects and programs critical to addressing local transportation needs of each subregion.

CCTA (Projects) – Fund is administered by CCTA for special projects that are granted on a project by project basis a portion of the Countywide Measure J sales tax. Generally these funds are allocated after a call for projects for a specific type of improvement, and must be included in CCTA’s Strategic Plan.

CCTA Return to Source – Countywide Measure J Sales Tax funds that proportionally assigned to each jurisdiction within Contra Costa County. Return to Source funds may be used for the construction and improvement of state highways, the construction, maintenance, improvement, and operation of local streets, roads, and highways, and the construction, improvement, and operation of public transit systems.

Drainage Impact Fees – Drainage Impact Fees are imposed on new development that creates additional impervious surface. The revenue is specified for drainage studies or improvement projects.

East Bay Regional Park District Measure WW – Regional funding of parks improvements.

Federal/State Funding – Funding is provided by State or Federal Programs, usually in conjunction with, or as a match to, some other form of funding.

Gas Tax Funds – Gas Tax funding is an 18 cents per gallon excise tax imposed by the State of California. Revenues are intergovernmental revenues received from the State each year with distribution based on population and a flat distribution amount. It will increase by 12 cents per gallon phased in between 2017‐2019 and then increase annually based on consumer price index for inflation. The use of Gas Tax funds is limited for street maintenance and related capital improvement project purposes.

General Fund – The City’s primary operating fund that is an account for tax and other general fund revenues (e.g., sales taxes, property taxes, investment interest, etc.).

Grant Funding Sources – Sources of grant funding are available from local, State, and Federal sources. These grant funds are generally received on a competitive basis.

Highway Bridge Program (HBP) – Authorized by the Federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA‐21), this program provides for the replacement or rehabilitation of public highway bridges over waterways, other topographical barriers, other highways, or railroads. 227

FUND SOURCES, continued

Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) – Formula funded Gas tax revenue provided to cities and counties for local streets and roads.

Library Fund– City of Orinda’s parcel tax for funding the library operations and maintenance of facilities.

Measure J – In 2014, $20 million General obligation bond approved by City of Orinda residents. Primary use of revenue is for road and drainage improvements on residential roads as selected by the Citizens’ Infrastructure Oversight Commission, generally roads with Pavement Condition Index less than 25.

Measure L (Sales Tax)– In 2012, a 0.5% sales tax approved by City of Orinda residents. Primary use of revenue is for road and drainage improvements on residential roads as selected by the Citizens’ Infrastructure Oversight Commission, generally roads with Pavement Condition Index less than 25.

Measure L (Bond) – In 2016, $25 million General obligation bond approved by City of Orinda residents. Primary use of revenue is for road and drainage improvements on residential roads as selected by the Citizens’ Infrastructure Oversight Commission.

Park Dedication Fees ‐ Park Dedication Fees are imposed on new development. The revenue is restricted for park and open space CIP projects.

Risk Management Fund – Monies set aside from the General Fund by City Council action for on‐going litigation or potential risk abatement issues for a project.

Road/Drainage Stabilization Fund – Monies set aside on a yearly basis from excess/unreserved General Fund revenues by City Council action for emergency/unforeseen road and drainage stabilization projects.

Stormwater Utility Assessment – Stormwater Utility Assessment (SUA) fees provide funding for activities that are necessary to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater program elements. The SUA, besides being a source of funding for Orinda’s share of Contra Costa County Clean Water Program activities, funds local drainage maintenance operations that improve the quality of stormwater controls consistent with NPDES objectives.

Transportation Impact Fees – The Transportation Improvement Fee was developed to help fund transportation improvements that will be needed as development occurs in the City. The fees collected are designated for improvements to the transportation system. Fees shall be used to complete circulation, transportation, and parking improvement projects specified in the Orinda General Plan or the Orinda Capital Improvement Program or the budget of the City of Orinda.

Tree Mitigation Fund – Fees collected to mitigate impact from tree removals throughout the City. 228 Acronyms

A L ABAG – Association of Bay Area Governments LEED – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act LF – Linear foot ATP – Active Transportation Program (Grant) LFFA – Lamorinda Fee & Finance Authority LAFCO – Local Agency Formation Commission B LLD – Landscape and Lighting District BAAQMD – Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART – Bay Area Rapid Transit M BMP – Best Management Practice MPA – Municipal Pooling Authority BTW – Bicycles, Trails, and Walkways Master Plan MTC – Metropolitan Transportation Commission

C N CALEMA – California Emergency Management Agency NPDES – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination CALTRANS – California Department of Transportation System

CCC – Contra Costa County CCCFC – Contra Costa County Flood Control O CCCSD – Central Contra Costa Sanitary District O & M – Operation & Maintenance CCTA – Contra Costa Transportation Authority OBAG – One Bay Area Grant (MTC) CCO – Contract Change Order OES – Office of Emergency Services CCTA – Contra Costa Transportation Authority OUSD ‐ Orinda Union School District

CCCSD – Central Contra Costa Sanitary District CEQA – California Environmental Quality Act P CFD – Community Facilities District PBTF – Pedestrian, Bicycle, Trails Facilities (Grant) CIOC – Citizen Infrastructure Oversight Committee PCI – Pavement Condition Index CIWMB – California Integrated Waste Management Board PDA – Priority Development Area CMP – Corrugated Metal Pipe PS&E – Plans, Specs, and Estimate

COP – Certificate of Participation CPM – Critical Path Method (Scheduling) R RFP – Request for Proposal E ROW – Right of Way EBMUD – East Bay Municipal Utility District RTIP – Regional Transportation Improvement Program EBRPD – East Bay Regional Park District RTPC – Regional Transportation Planning Committee EIR – Environmental Impact Report RWQCB – Regional Water Quality Control Board

EOC – Emergency Operations Center EPA – Environmental Protection Agency S SIA – Subdivision Improvement Agreement F SRTS – Safe Routes to School grant program FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency STIP – State Transportation Improvement Program FHWA – Federal Highway Administration STP – Surface Transportation Program SWAT – Southwest Area Transportation SWPPP – Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan G GASB – Governmental Accounting Standards Board GIS – Geographic Information Services T GNP – Gross National Product TAC – Technical Advisory Committee TDA – Transportation Development Act (Grant) GPA – General Plan Amendment st TEA 21 – Transportation Equity Act for the 21 Century TIP – Transportation Improvement Program H TLC – Transportation for Livable Communities (Grant) HBP – Highway Bridge Program TSAC – Traffic Safety Advisory Committee HOA – Home Owners Association HUTA – Highway Users Tax Account U HVAC – Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning System ULL – Urban Limit Line

229 GLOSSARY

A Account ‐ A subdivision within a fund for the purpose of classifying transactions.

Accounting System – The methods and records established to identify, assemble, analyze, classify, record, and report a government’s transactions and to maintain accountability for the related assets and liabilities.

Actual Cost ‐ The amount paid for asset; not its market value, insurable value, or retail value. It generally includes freight‐in and installation costs but not interest on the debt to acquire it.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ‐ Federal economic stimulus funding for transportation projects.

Americans with Disabilities Act ‐ A Federal law providing for a wide range of protection to individuals.

Assessments ‐ Charges made to parties for actual services or benefits received.

Assets ‐ Government‐owned property that has monetary value.

Audit ‐ A review of the accounting system and financial information to determine how government funds were spent and whether expenditures were in compliance with the legislative body’s appropriations.

B Bond ‐ A written promise from a local government to repay a sum of money on a specific date at a specified interest rate. Bonds are most frequently used to finance capital improvement projects.

Budget ‐ A plan of financial operation, for a set time period, which identifies specific types and levels of services to be provided, proposed appropriations or expenses, and the recommended means of financing them.

Budget Amendments ‐ The Council has the sole responsibility for adopting the City’s budget, and may amend or supplement the budget at any time after adoption by majority vote.

Budget Document ‐ The financial plan report reviewed and adopted by the City Council.

C California Emergency Management Agency ‐ The governing State agency responsible for emergency services in California.

Capital Improvement – Construction or major repair of City buildings and facilities such as streets, roads, highways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, traffic signals , and parks.

Capital Improvement Plan ‐ A financial program of authorized expenditures for tangible, long‐term construction of, or improvements to public physical facilities.

Capital Expenditures – Expenditures resulting in the acquisition of or addition to the government’s general fixed assets.

Capital Outlay ‐ Expenditures which result in the acquisition of, or addition to, fixed assets.

Capital Fund ‐ A governmental fund used to account for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds and trust funds.

Certificate of Participation ‐ Obligations of a public entity based on a lease or installment sale agreement.

Community Facilities District ‐ A funding mechanism for capital improvements for a specific area of development.

Construction Engineering – Engineering work during the construction process ensures projects are constructed in accordance with design parameters and specifications.

230 GLOSSARY

Contingency ‐ An appropriation of funds to cover unforeseen events or unanticipated expenditures.

Contractual Services ‐ Professional services procured independently by contract or agreement with an individual, firm, corporation or other governmental units.

Current Fiscal Year ‐ The fiscal year in progress from July 1 through June 30.

D Department ‐ A basic organizational unit of government which is functionally unique in its delivery of services.

Development ‐ In real estate, process of placing improvements on or to a parcel of land; projects where such improvements are being made.

E Encumbrance ‐ The commitment of appropriated funds to purchase goods or services. An encumbrance is not an expenditure. An encumbrance reserves funds to be expended.

Estimate ‐ To approximate.

Expenditure/Expense ‐ The outflow of funds paid or to be paid for an asset obtained or goods and services obtained regardless of when the expenditure is actually paid.

F Fee ‐ Cost of Service.

Federal Emergency Management Agency ‐ The governing Federal agency responsible for emergency services nationwide.

Fiscal Year ‐ The 12‐month period for recording financial transactions specified by the City as beginning July 1 and ending June 30.

Full Time Equivalent ‐ The designation of staffing based on the Full Time Equivalent for personnel using a guideline of 2,080 hours per year (1.0 FTE) or for 1,040 hours (0.5 FTE).

Fund ‐ A separate accounting entity, with a self‐balancing set of accounts, to record all financial

transactions (revenues and expenditures) for specific activities or government functions.

Fund Balance ‐ The excess of assets over liabilities and reserves; also known as surplus funds. This term applies to governmental funds only.

G Gas Tax Fund ‐ A fund to account for receipts and expenditures of money apportioned under Street and Highway Code section 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5 of the State of California.

Garbage Franchise Fees ‐ A form of rent for use of public streets and roadways.

General Fund ‐ A governmental fund used to account for tax and revenues (e.g., sales taxes, property taxes, investment interest) and records the transactions of general governmental services.

Grants ‐ Contributions or gifts of cash or other assets from another governmental agency to be used or expended for a specified purpose.

H Highway Bridge Program – Federal program to fund rehabilitation of bridge structures. Highway Users Tax Account – An excise tax on gasoline.

I Inflation ‐ Rise in the prices of goods and services, as happens when spending increases relative to the supply of goods on the market.

231 GLOSSARY

Infrastructure ‐ The physical assets of the City, such as streets, water, wastewater, public buildings, and parks, and the support structures within a development.

Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ‐ This fund was created to administer those monies the City has secured for various street and traffic signal projects from the federal government.

J Jurisdiction ‐ Geographic or political entity governed by a particular legal system or body of laws.

L Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District Funds ‐ Funds to account for revenues derived from annual assessments which are used to pay the cost incurred by the City for landscape maintenance and street lighting maintenance.

Liability ‐ Debt or other legal obligations arising out of transactions in the past which must be liquidated, renewed or refunded at some future date. Encumbrances are not considered to be liabilities.

Lump Sum ‐ Typically a single payment instead of a series of installments.

N Net ‐ (1) Figure remaining after all relevant deductions have been made from the gross amount. (2) To arrive at the difference between additions and subtractions or plus amounts and minus amounts.

O Objective ‐ Measurable statement of the intended beneficial and tangible effects of a program’s activities. An objective is a specific target toward which a manager can plan, schedule work activities and make staff assignments.

Operation & Maintenance ‐ Cost associated with a capital facility that will impact the City on an ongoing and annual basis.

Operating Expense ‐ A series of object codes which include expenditures for items which primarily benefit the current period and are not defined as personnel services, contractual services or capital outlays.

Ordinance ‐ The laws of a municipality.

Organization ‐ Organized structure of roles and responsibilities functioning to accomplish predetermined objectives.

P PG&E Rule 20A Funding ‐ Projects performed under Rule 20A are nominated by an agency and discussed with Pacific Gas & Electric Company, as well as other utilities. The costs for undergrounding overheard utilities under Rule 20A are recovered through electric rates after the project is completed.

Prior Expenditures ‐ The fiscals year preceding the current year.

Program ‐ An organized self‐contained set of related work activities within a department or division, which are directed toward common objectives and represent a well‐defined expenditure of City

resources. R Reserve ‐ That portion of a fund’s balance legally restricted for a specific purpose and therefore not available for general appropriation.

Resolution ‐ (1) In general, expression of desire or intent. (2) Legal order by a government entity.

Revenues ‐ Funds received from various sources and treated as income to the City, which are used to finance expenditures. Examples are tax payments, fees for services, receipts from other governments, fines, grants, licenses, permits, shared revenue and interest income.

232 GLOSSARY

Right of Way ‐ The public designation for space needed to accommodate streets, public utilities and other public facilities.

S Special Assessment – A compulsory levy made against certain properties to defray all or part of the cost of a specific capital improvement or service deemed to benefit primarily those properties.

Special District ‐ A designated geographic area established to provide a specialized service.

T Taxes – Compulsory charges levied by a government to finance services performed for the common benefit.

U Update ‐ Revise printed information according to the most current information available.

233

Supplementary Information – Attachments

7 TSM Ordinance – Resolution 00‐06 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248

Supplementary Information – Attachments

9 Measure J Growth Management Element, Resolution 19‐09 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257

Supplementary Information – Attachments

12.1 LSM Annual Report, FY 2017‐18 258

ANNUAL REPORTING FORM for LOCAL STREET MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS (LSM) FUNDS (18% LSM FUNDS & 2.09% ADDITIONAL FUNDS) FOR ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES DURING FISCAL YEAR 2017-18

Jurisdiction: ______CITY OF ORINDA______

If you have any questions regarding this form, please contact Matt Kelly at CCTA, 925-256-4730. Please return the form to CCTA, along with the project detail spreadsheet, Attention: Wilma Van Hook, at the address below

Total for FY 2017-18

Balance as of July 1, 2017 135,738

18% + 2.09% Funds Received during FY 2017-18 (actual, not accrued) 37,644

Eligible Expenditures (Please describe all expenditures in excess of $10,000 on the LSM Audit Reporting spreadsheet) Local Street and Roads 135,223 Growth Management Planning and Compliance Transit Capital and Operations Trails Parking Facilities Transportation Demand Management/Transportation Systems

Management Total Expenditures during FY 2017-18 135,223 Funds Remaining 38,159 Interest Earned 176

Balance as of June 30, 2018 38,335

Form prepared by: Paul S. Rankin Phone: (925) 253-4224 Email: [email protected] Title: Finance Director Date: December 14, 2018 259

CITY OF ORINDA Reporting Period: Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 CCTA Measure J Local Streets & Roads Maintenance Audit Reporting Form (for expenditures of $10,000 or more) Measure J Funds Project Type Project Name Project Description (Location, Limits) Expended ($) Reporting Metric (see instructions) Pavement rehabilitation (full depth reclamation and mill & fill): Don Gabriel Way from Valley View Drive to El Camino Moraga Way, El Camino Moraga from Don Gabriel Way to Moraga Way, and El Nido Ranch Road from St. Stephen Drive 2 lane miles were rehabilitated and Measure J Local Streets and Roads 2017 Annual Paving to City Limit). $ 135,223 funds were 18% of the project expenses. 260

Supplementary Information – Attachments

12.2 LSM Annual Report, FY 2018‐19 261

ANNUAL REPORTING FORM for LOCAL STREET MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS (LSM) FUNDS (18% LSM FUNDS & 2.09% ADDITIONAL FUNDS) FOR ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES DURING FISCAL YEAR 2018-19

Jurisdiction: ______CITY OF ORINDA______

If you have any questions regarding this form, please contact Matt Kelly at CCTA, 925-256-4730. Please return the form to CCTA, along with the project detail spreadsheet, Attn: Jackie Reyes (address listed below)

Total for FY 2018-19

Balance as of July 1, 2018 38,335

18% + 2.09% Funds Received during FY 2018-19 (actual, not accrued) 701,543

Eligible Expenditures (Please describe all expenditures in excess of $10,000 on the LSM Audit Reporting spreadsheet) Local Street and Roads 57,273 Growth Management Planning and Compliance Transit Capital and Operations Trails Parking Facilities Transportation Demand Management/Transportation Systems

Management Total Expenditures during FY 2018-19 57,273 Funds Remaining 682,605 Interest Earned 6,102

Balance as of June 30, 2019 688,707

Form prepared by: ___Nancy Zhang______Phone: _ __925-253-4223______Email: [email protected]__ Title: __Senior Accountant__ Date: __12/16/2019_

262

Jurisdiction: City of Orinda (for expenditures of $10,000 or more) Reporting Period: FY 2018‐2019 CCTA Measure J Local Streets & Roads Maintenance Audit Reporting Form Measure J Funds Project Type Project Name Project Description (Location, Limits) Expended ($) Reporting Metric (see instructions) Contribution towards project that rehabilitated Rehabilitation of medians along Camino Pablo from Orinda 7,000 SF of medians. 63.5% of the full project cost Local Streets and Roads Camino Pablo Median Project Way to Camino Encinas $50,000 was funded by sources other than CCTA