Monuments of Christian Sinnuris (Fayyum, Egypt)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ECA 8 (2011), p. 29-48; doi: 10.2143 / ECA.8.0.2961364 Monuments of Christian Sinnuris (Fayyum, Egypt) Peter GROSSMANN, Tomasz DERDA, and Jacques VAN DER VLIET Following an earthquake in the early 1990s, the saint. Already in the seventeenth century, the early ancient sanctuary of the Archangel Michael (Kani- orientalist Vansleb (J.M. Wansleben) described it sat al-Malak, Dayr al-Malak Mikhail) in Sinnuris as a church dedicated to the Archangel Michael5. It (locally pronounced Sinauris), a district town about cannot, therefore, be identified out of hand with twelve kilometers north of Fayyum city, was demol- an-Nabulusi’s western monastery6. It seems more ished and replaced by a glittering new church. likely that it was a successor to one of the two town Today, hardly any remains of Sinnuris’ past survive churches mentioned by an-Nabulusi, but even this in situ, and very little is known about the Christian cannot be verified for lack of further information. history of the town, which boasts a flourishing In any case, in September 2003 nothing remained Coptic Orthodox parish as well as a protestant of the earlier churches of Sinnuris other than a church1. ruined altar screen with some Coptic and Arabic For Late Antique and Early Medieval Sinnuris inscriptions, dumped in a narrow corridor to the (CenÕriv, CineÕriv), a certain amount of papyro- east of the new church. In the literature only scarce logical documentation exists in Greek and Coptic, documentation is found about the church’s prede- which still awaits systematic study2. These sources cessors (see below). suggest that the town had its share in the consider- The present article may be described as a form able economic activity that characterized the of salvage archaeology on paper. The first part con- Fayyum in the Byzantine and Early Islamic periods. sists of Peter Grossmann’s notes on the Medieval It was, in fact, sufficiently well known in the fifth church of Sinnuris, elements of which were still and sixth centuries to be mentioned as an Aîguptía kÉmj in the Ethnica of Stephen of Byzantium (s.v. CenÕriv). This impression of prosperity is con- firmed by the beautiful stone monuments from this period that were preserved until recently in the 1 The Orthodox church is no. 19 in the list of churches of Church of St Michael: the Greek funerary stela of the (then) diocese of Fayyum and Giza published in Som- the baker (siligniarios) Damian, published earlier by ers Clarke 1912, 205; it is erroneously mentioned under one of the present authors3, and the votive relief of the lemma ‘Sînarû’ in Timm 1984-1992, V, 2354-2355. For the protestant church, see Meinardus 1977, 579 (under Phib and Phoibammon, republished below. Baptist Evangelical Church); Timm 1979, 135. For a somewhat later period, we have the 2 See Wessely 1904, 163-165, 167-168; Timm 1984-1992, description of the Fayyum written around the year IV, 2034-2035 (s.v. Psenyris); 5, 2355-2356 (s.v. Sinau- 1245 by a Muslim author known as Uthman an- ris); Derda 2008, 143, ad no. 27, l. 7, with full references that are not repeated here. Contrary to Wessely, we con- Nabulusi. He reports that the quite considerable sider both forms of the toponym to refer to the same place. town of Sinnuris numbered two churches, one of 3 Van der Vliet 2002-2003, 140-142, Tafel 22, right. In the which was functioning, whereas the other had 1980s, this stela could still be seen in the old church, see fallen into disuse, in addition to a monastery to the Fathy Khurshid 1998, Pl. 50; it has disappeared since then. 4 Ed. Moritz 1899, 107, l. 15-16; Salmon 1901, 50-51; cf. west of the town, which he designates as Dayr Sin- Keenan 2005. nuris4. Fathy Khurshid, writing in the 1980s, 5 Vansleb 1677, 265; we thank Gertrud van Loon for kindly applies the same name to the modern church com- providing copies of the corresponding pages from Vansleb’s plex. This complex, however, is situated in the Italian diary of 1676 (Bibliothèque nationale de France, ms. italien 435, 51-52); for Vansleb, see now Hamilton north-eastern part of the town centre and is other- 2006, 142-151. wise always referred to by the name of its patron 6 Pace van der Vliet 2002-2003, 140. 29 95300_ECA8(2011)_03.indd 29 27/02/13 15:17 visible in 1977, although much had been changed and some pillars in the nave appeared to represent and built over. In the second part, Tomasz Derda an earlier building phase (Fig. 1)9. It is unknown and Jacques van der Vliet republish the Late Antique when the church to which these older elements votive relief of Phib and Phoibammon, which they belonged was erected. Our discussion below sug- recorded in September 2003, adding an icono- gests that it may have been of medieval date, yet it graphical commentary by van der Vliet, who also may have replaced a Late Antique predecessor in acted as the general editor of the article7. In an this location10. The lateral outer walls of this ear- appendix, van der Vliet briefly presents the inscrip- lier, possibly Medieval church were demolished tions of the altar screen mentioned above. already in the nineteenth century, during recon- struction and enlargement works. The structure I. THE ANCIENT CHURCH OF was expanded on its south side with a three-aisled THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL IN SINNURIS basilical church which had three altar rooms (haykals). A panel in this South Church, inscribed The Church of St Michael in Sinnuris, as it was in Arabic, recorded that it was built in 189011. The visible in the 1970s (Pl. 1), preserved only meagre one-aisled northern annex, with only one altar vestiges of its original architecture8. Merely the apse room, was not dated but may have been somewhat older than the South Church (Fig. 3). Nothing of all these constructions remains today. Fortunately, in 1977, before the church was demolished, those elements of its architecture that 7 The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Clara ten Hacken, Leiden, for the Arabic texts. The article prof- appeared to belong to its earlier, possibly Medieval ited from critical remarks by Gertrud van Loon, Zuzana building phase could be recorded. These seem to Skalova, and Ewa D. Zakrzewska. point to a basilical structure with rectangular pillars 8 Vansleb, who visited Sinnuris on 31 July 1672, must have that are placed in a strangely transversal alignment. seen more, but he was far from impressed. He characterized A western pair of such pillars, integrated into later the church as “fort pauvre”, without giving further details 12 (Vansleb 1677, 265); he showed more interest in the stone constructions, survived in situ . In the light of the relief, described below. general proportions of the church, it seems unlikely 9 Samuel al Syriani/Badii Habib 1990, 146-147, Fig. 190 that there were originally more of these pillars to (ground plan), Pl. 188, left; cf. Fathy Khurshid 1998, 135- 138, Pl. 8 (ground plan) and 46-58; a brief notice with a the west. The strong west wall that was incorpo- photo of the interior also in Leclant 1979, 364, Pl. XIII, rated into the more recent northern annex may Fig. 18 (here reproduced again as Pl. 1). have preserved parts of the original western outer 10 For the Late Antique and Early Medieval sources on Sin- wall. Only the situation of the entrance, placed out nuris, see the references given in the introduction. 11 The panel is reproduced in Fathy Khurshid 1998, Pl. 46; of the axis of the building, is a curious feature. The cf. Samuel al Syriani/Badii Habib 1990, 147. It situates the phenomenon is not without parallels elsewhere: in renovation of the church under the administration of a the Church of the Mother of God in the Monas- mu’allim Shihat Abd as-Sayyid and in the episcopacy of the tery of St Catherine in the Sinai, for instance, dat- famous Bishop Abraham, bishop of the Fayyum between 1881 and 1914, but does not provide further details. For ing from the reign of Justinian, where the displace- a plan of this South Church, see Samuel al Syriani/Badii ment of the main entrance is probably due to Habib 1990, ibid., and Fathy Khurshid 1998, Pl. 8. irregularities in the soil13. In the Sinnuris church, 12 Unwarrantedly considered modern by Samuel al Syriani/ however, this entrance does not seem to have been Badii Habib 1990, 147; that they had been integrated into the design of the modern South Church does not contra- part of the original plan. dict their original character. The next two pillars to the east To the east of this pair of transversal pillars, and are not original, however; their position corresponds situated at about the same distance as to the western exactly to that of the inner piers of the South Church and entrance wall, one finds another pillar belonging to they must have been inserted together with these. 13 See Grossmann 1990, 34, Fig. 3; also in the city church of this same building phase. This latter pillar shows a the Holy Anargyroi at Pharan (Sinai) the outer entrance to more or less westward oriented T-shaped profile, the narthex as well as the entrance to the nave are clearly but with legs of unequal length on all sides, as can placed out of the axis of the church, see Grossmann 1998, often be found in pillars of transeptal churches14. In 66-74, with Fig. 5.