DOCSLIB.ORG

[Communist Pamphlets]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[Communist Pamphlets] ILLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Brittle Books Project, 2011. COPYRIGHT NOTIFICATION In Copyright. Reproduced according to U.S. copyright law USC 17 section 107. Contact [email protected] for more information. This digital copy was made from the printed version held by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. It was made in compliance with copyright law. Prepared for the Brittle Books Project, Preservation Department, Main Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign by Northern Micrographics Brookhaven Bindery La Crosse, Wisconsin 2011 C OMMUNISM I. RUSSIA 1. HISTORICAL. The idea of Communism, which Webster defines as "Any theory or system of social organization involving common ownership of the agents of production, and some approach to equality in the distribution of the pro- ducts of industry," is not new. In 1776 Dr. Adam Weishaupt, a professor of law in a Bavarian college, founded the Order of the Illuminati with the aim of abolishing monarchy and all ordered government, private property, inheritance, patriotism, the family, and religion. The order spread rapidly tl :agh France, Italy and Germany, but was eventually exposed and driv- e :nderground. In 1789 the Jacobin Club, organized by Robespierre and ot a who had been affiliated with the Illuminati, did much to give so sa ,ainary a hue to the French Revolution and provide a pattern for the R ussian Bolsheviks some 130 years later. Undoubtedly influenced by Weishaupt, Jean Jacques Rousseau and ot' ers, Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels, two apostate young German Jews, produced the famous Communist Manifesto in 1848 as the platform of the Communist League, a German organization which later became inter- national. Marx divided society into two opposing camps, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, separated by class warfare until the former should have overcome the latter through the destruction of all those institutions of civilization which Weishaupt had aimed to abolish in the previous cen- tury. As a result of the spread of these doctrines, the First International was organized in London in 1864, a world body composed of radical groups from various nations, which survived until 1876 when its last convention was held in Philadelphia. Considerable impetus had been given to radical thought by the Paris Commune of 1871 and the Second International was organized within a few years of the dissolution of the First. In 1903 the radical left wing of the Russian Social Democratic Party, called the Bolsheviki, or "majority", split off from the right wing, the Menshevike, or "minority", to form two groups within the International. At the outbreak of the World War, the Bolsheviki repudiated the moderate group, which is still in existence as the Labor Socialist International with headquarters in London. Frequent conferences were held by the Second International, and in 1915 at Zmimer- wald, Switzerland, Nicolai Lenin, exiled from Russia for many years for his revolutionary activities, came into prominence. With Lenin in Switzerland, Trotzki in the Bronx, and Stalin exiled in Siberia, all completely detached for the time being from the: Russian scene, the Czar abdicated in March 1917 as a result of the first Russian Revolution, which was comparatively bloodless and of a bourgeois rather than proletarian character, the government being taken over by Prince Lvoff and the Douma. Within 30 or 40 days after the Prince had been succeeded by Kerensky, Lenin with thirty other left wing revolutionaries, through the good offices of the German Government, was conveyed in a sealed railway car via Germany into Russia, where, as the result of a second Revolution starting on 7 November 1917, Kerensky was overthrown and Lenin and Trotsky, as the leaders of the Bolsheviki, came into posses- 2 COMMUNISM sion of the supreme power. And thus, through the instrumentality of 30,000 or 40,000 actual Communists, the Soviet form of government was imposed upon this vast country of 150,000,000 souls amid scenes which far outdid the French Revolution. While Trotzky and the Red Army dealt with the Polish and the White Russian Armies, and the Cheka (secret police) suppressed all in- ternal riots and opposition with massacre and ruthless terrorism, Lenin set out to establish a state on pure Communistic lines. The value of the rouble was destroyed; trade of every kind, except by the state, was for- bidden; private and church property confiscated; industry nationalized; and the best brains of the country, technical along with the rest, destroyed or driven into exile. In 1921 Lenin, faced with a crisis in the total failure of the Marxian economic system, introduced his N. E. P. (or New Economic Policy), under which a certain amount of private business was permitted. In 1924, fearful of fostering capitalism in view of the accumulating means of individuals engaged in trade under this policy, repressive measures were taken by the Government, and in 1928 the so-called Five Year Plan was formulated, which brings us up to the present day. 2. PRESENT ORGANIZATION IN RUSSIA. To help complete our background for the study of Communism in this country, some understanding of the present regime in Russia is neces- sary. The legislative power is vested in the Congress of Soviets, which meets every two years, selecting a central executive committee of between 400 and 500 members to represent it during the intermission. This com- mittee, in turn, selects a smaller group, known as the Praesidium, which is the real legislative authority and appoints the commissars and judicial officers of the government. Early in 1919, the Russian Communist Party and the Spartacus group of revolutionaries in Germany joined in issuing a call for an international congress of revolutionary workers to be held in Moscow. Out of this evolv- ed the Third, or Communist, International, also called the "Comintern" the instigating source of propaganda and revolutionary activities in other countries. To the protest of foreign governments against this Russian-inspired subversive action in their countries, the Soviet foreign minister is wont to disclaim all knowledge, with the statement that any such activities must have been the work of the Third International for which his government is not responsible. In point of fact, a thoroughly specious claim, for the directorates of the International (Komintern) and Soviet governments are interlocking, Stalin sitting at the same time in the Praesidia of both. For a present day description of the Russion Communist Party, which is inextricably bound up with the other two organizations, we quote from Professor Samuel N. Harper's recent book, "Making Bolshevilks": "There are just short of 2,000,000 Communist party-members, including candidates passing through a period of probation. It is enough to speak of them as 'party-members', for there is only the single party in the Soviet order. The two million Communists are distributed in some 50,000 groups or 'cells'; in practically every institution of any importance-government office, school, factory, or collective farm-there is the organized group of party-members, and it is the only group that is permitted to organize. The Communist leads politically the larger group of which he is a member, and supervises and directs its economic activity, carrying out the directions of the party authorities. These cells are coordinated by local committees, which, in turn, are under higher committees, all headed up in the Central Commit- tee, of which Stalin is the General Secretary ........... The party cells are RUSSIA 3 distributed also through the Red Army, in every regiment and barrack, to the number of over 6,000, coordinating the activity of the 120,000 Commun- ists in the official total of 562,000 Red Armyists." Theoretically, the Rus- sian Communist Party is only a branch of the Komintern and neither have anything to do with the Soviet Government. Practically, however, the party controls both through the Political Bureau of its Central Committee, called the Polit-bureau and consisting of 10 members. This domination is indicated by an. extract from a speech by Lenin: "Formally a solution of this problem is very difficult, because the only legal party among us con- trols the Government; " and again from a speech by Trotzky, "Who is going to decide this question? We have the council of people's commis- sars, but that council must be under a certain control. That control can- not be exercised by the unorganized working masses. We, therefore, have to summon the central committee of the party and have it formulate an answer to this proposition." Since, as Lenin says, "the only legal party controls the government", there is no opposition, no minority party whatever, with the result that the Soviet is an autocratic government comparable to that of Mussolini in Italy and far more ruthless. We quote Professor Harper again on the recent liquidation of the Kulaks, or rich peasants, by way of example, "It was in the looting of the rich peasants that the class struggle took on its most distressing forms during the first months of 1930 ........ The number of families literally thrown out of their homes, and even expelled from the village, cannot be estimated with any accuracy. There were about 5,000,000 officially designated as rich peasants. Many of the middle peasants were subjected to practically the same forcible expropriation, being told that they would be treated as rich peasants if they did not join the collective farm........Poor peasants told the writer of the ruthless methods of liqui- dation of the rich peasant which they adopted, 'We gave them till morning to get out, they could go where they wanted but they had to get out.' The freight trains of those sent north were described by railway workers" The Report of the Fish Committee mentions the same subject: "The O.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Garland's Million: the Radical Experiment To
    October 14, 2019 To: ABF Legal History Seminar From: John Fabian Witt Re: October 23 seminar Thanks so much for looking at my drafts and coming to my session! I’m thrilled to have been invited to Chicago. I am attaching chapters 5 and 8 from my book-in-progress, tentatively titled Garland’s Million: The Radical Experiment to Save American Democracy. The book is the story of an organization known informally as the Garland Fund or formally as the American Fund for Public Service: a philanthropic foundation established in 1922 to give money to liberal and left causes. The Fund figures prominently in the history of civil rights lawyering because of its role setting in motion the early stages of the NAACP’s litigation campaign that led a quarter-century later to Brown v. Board of Education. I hope you will be able to get some sense of the project from the crucial chapters I’ve attached here. These chapters come from Part 2 of the book. Part 1 focuses on Roger Baldwin, the founder of the ACLU and the principal energy behind the Fund. Part 2 (including the chapters here) focuses on James Weldon Johnson, who ran the NAACP during the 1920s and was a board member of the Fund. Parts 3 and 4 turn respectively to Elizabeth Gurley Flynn (a labor radical on the board) and Felix Frankfurter, who in the 1920s served as a key outside consultant and counsel to the Fund. To set the stage, readers have learned in Part 1 about Baldwin as a disillusioned reformer, who advocated progressive programs like the initiative and referendum only to see direct democracy produce a wave of white supremacist initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Morris Childs Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf896nb2v4 No online items Register of the Morris Childs papers Finding aid prepared by Lora Soroka and David Jacobs Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6010 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1999 Register of the Morris Childs 98069 1 papers Title: Morris Childs papers Date (inclusive): 1924-1995 Collection Number: 98069 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English and Russian Physical Description: 2 manuscript boxes, 35 microfilm reels(4.3 linear feet) Abstract: Correspondence, reports, notes, speeches and writings, and interview transcripts relating to Federal Bureau of Investigation surveillance of the Communist Party, and the relationship between the Communist Party of the United States and the Soviet communist party and government. Includes some papers of John Barron used as research material for his book Operation Solo: The FBI's Man in the Kremlin (Washington, D.C., 1996). Hard-copy material also available on microfilm (2 reels). Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Childs, Morris, 1902-1991. Contributor: Barron, John, 1930-2005. Location of Original Materials J. Edgar Hoover Foundation (in part). Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items, computer media, and digital files. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos, films, or digital files during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all material is immediately accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism in One Country” Promoting National Identity Based on Class Identification
    “Socialism in One Country” Promoting National Identity Based on Class Identification IVAN SZPAKOWSKI The Russian Empire of the Romanovs spanned thousands of miles from the Baltic to the Pacific, with a population of millions drawn from dozens of ethnic groups. Following the Russian Civil War, the Bolsheviks inherited the problem of holding together such a heterogeneous body. At the same time, they were forced to uphold Marxist ideology demanding worldwide revolution of the proletariat while facing the reality that despite the turmoil following the First World War no such revolution was forthcoming. In 1924 the rising Joseph Stalin, along with Nikolai Bukharin, devised the theory of “Socialism in One Country” which would become the solution to many of these problems facing the Bolsheviks. First of all, it proclaimed the ability of socialism to succeed in the Soviet Union alone, without foreign aid. Additionally, it marked a change from Lenin’s policy of self-determination for the Soviet Union’s constituent nations to Stalin’s policy of a compulsory unitary state. These non-Russian ethnics were systematically and firmly incorporated into the Soviet Union by the promotion of a proletariat class mentality. The development of the theory and policy of “Socialism in One Country” thus served to forge the unitary national identity of the Soviet Union around the concept of common Soviet class identity. The examination of this policy’s role in building a new form of national identity is dependant on a variety of sources, grouped into several subject areas. First, the origin of the term “Socialism in One Country,” its original meaning and its interpretation can be found in the speeches and writings of prominent contemporary communist leaders, chief among them: Stalin and Trotsky.
    [Show full text]
  • The Karl Marx
    LENIN LIBRARY VO,LUME I 000'705 THE TEA~HINGS OF KARL MARX • By V. I. LENIN FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY U8AARY SOCIALIST - LABOR COllEClIOK INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS 381 FOURTH AVENUE • NEW YORK .J THE TEACHINGS OF KARL MARX BY V. I. LENIN INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS I NEW YORK Copyright, 1930, by INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS CO., INC. PRINTED IN THE U. S. A. ~72 CONTENTS KARL MARX 5 MARX'S TEACHINGS 10 Philosophic Materialism 10 Dialectics 13 Materialist Conception of History 14 Class Struggle 16 Marx's Economic Doctrine . 18 Socialism 29 Tactics of the Class Struggle of the Proletariat . 32 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MARXISM 37 THE TEACHINGS OF KARL MARX By V. I. LENIN KARL MARX KARL MARX was born May 5, 1818, in the city of Trier, in the Rhine province of Prussia. His father was a lawyer-a Jew, who in 1824 adopted Protestantism. The family was well-to-do, cultured, bu~ not revolutionary. After graduating from the Gymnasium in Trier, Marx entered first the University at Bonn, later Berlin University, where he studied 'urisprudence, but devoted most of his time to history and philosop y. At th conclusion of his uni­ versity course in 1841, he submitted his doctoral dissertation on Epicure's philosophy:* Marx at that time was still an adherent of Hegel's idealism. In Berlin he belonged to the circle of "Left Hegelians" (Bruno Bauer and others) who sought to draw atheistic and revolutionary conclusions from Hegel's philosophy. After graduating from the University, Marx moved to Bonn in the expectation of becoming a professor. However, the reactionary policy of the government,-that in 1832 had deprived Ludwig Feuer­ bach of his chair and in 1836 again refused to allow him to teach, while in 1842 it forbade the Y0ung professor, Bruno Bauer, to give lectures at the University-forced Marx to abandon the idea of pursuing an academic career.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Civil Rights Congress As a Communist Front Organization
    X Union Calendar No. 575 80th Congress, 1st Session House Report No. 1115 REPORT ON CIVIL RIGHTS CONGRESS AS A COMMUNIST FRONT ORGANIZATION INVESTIGATION OF UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES IN THE UNITED STATES COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ^ EIGHTIETH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Public Law 601 (Section 121, Subsection Q (2)) Printed for the use of the Committee on Un-American Activities SEPTEMBER 2, 1947 'VU November 17, 1947.— Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1947 ^4-,JH COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES J. PARNELL THOMAS, New Jersey, Chairman KARL E. MUNDT, South Dakota JOHN S. WOOD, Georgia JOHN Mcdowell, Pennsylvania JOHN E. RANKIN, Mississippi RICHARD M. NIXON, California J. HARDIN PETERSON, Florida RICHARD B. VAIL, Illinois HERBERT C. BONNER, North Carolina Robert E. Stripling, Chief Inrestigator Benjamin MAi^Dt^L. Director of Research Union Calendar No. 575 SOth Conokess ) HOUSE OF KEriiEfcJENTATIVES j Report 1st Session f I1 No. 1115 REPORT ON CIVIL RIGHTS CONGRESS AS A COMMUNIST FRONT ORGANIZATION November 17, 1917. —Committed to the Committee on the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. Thomas of New Jersey, from the Committee on Un-American Activities, submitted the following REPORT REPORT ON CIVIL RIGHTS CONGRESS CIVIL RIGHTS CONGRESS 205 EAST FORTY-SECOND STREET, NEW YORK 17, N. T. Murray Hill 4-6640 February 15. 1947 HoNOR.\RY Co-chairmen Dr. Benjamin E. Mays Dr. Harry F. Ward Chairman of the board: Executive director: George Marshall Milton Kaufman Trea-surcr: Field director: Raymond C.
    [Show full text]
  • John Ahouse-Upton Sinclair Collection, 1895-2014
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cn764d No online items INVENTORY OF THE JOHN AHOUSE-UPTON SINCLAIR COLLECTION, 1895-2014, Finding aid prepared by Greg Williams California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room 5039 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html ©2014 INVENTORY OF THE JOHN "Consult repository." 1 AHOUSE-UPTON SINCLAIR COLLECTION, 1895-2014, Descriptive Summary Title: John Ahouse-Upton Sinclair Collection Dates: 1895-2014 Collection Number: "Consult repository." Collector: Ahouse, John B. Extent: 12 linear feet, 400 books Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room 5039 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html Abstract: This collection consists of 400 books, 12 linear feet of archival items and resource material about Upton Sinclair collected by bibliographer John Ahouse, author of Upton Sinclair, A Descriptive Annotated Bibliography . Included are Upton Sinclair books, pamphlets, newspaper articles, publications, circular letters, manuscripts, and a few personal letters. Also included are a wide variety of subject files, scholarly or popular articles about Sinclair, videos, recordings, and manuscripts for Sinclair biographies. Included are Upton Sinclair’s A Monthly Magazine, EPIC Newspapers and the Upton Sinclair Quarterly Newsletters. Language: Collection material is primarily in English Access There are no access restrictions on this collection. Publication Rights All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Director of Archives and Special Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 11. I Have Approached This Subject in Greater Detail in J. D
    NOTES Introduction 11. I have approached this subject in greater detail in J. D. White, Karl Marx and the Intellectual Origins of Dialectical Materialism (Basingstoke and London, 1996). 12. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 38, p. 180. 13. K. Marx, Grundrisse, translated by M. Nicolaus (Harmondsworth, 1973), p. 408. 14. N. I. Ziber, Teoriia tsennosti i kapitala D. Rikardo v sviazi s pozdneishimi dopolneniiami i raz"iasneniiami. Opyt kritiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniia (Kiev, 1871). 15. N. G. Chernyshevskii, ‘Dopolnenie i primechaniia na pervuiu knigu politicheskoi ekonomii Dzhon Stiuarta Millia’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 3 (Geneva, 1869); ‘Ocherki iz politicheskoi ekonomii (po Milliu)’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 4 (Geneva, 1870). Reprinted in N. G. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, Vol. IX (Moscow, 1949). 16. Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vols XI–XVI. 17. M. M. Kovalevskii, Obshchinnoe zemlevladenie, prichiny, khod i posledstviia ego razlozheniia (Moscow, 1879). 18. Marx to the editorial board of Otechestvennye zapiski, November 1877, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 196–201. 19. Marx to Zasulich, 8 March 1881, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 346–73. 10. It was published in the journal Vestnik Narodnoi Voli, no. 5 (1886). 11. D. Riazanov, ‘V Zasulich i K. Marks’, Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vol. 1 (1924), pp. 269–86. 12. N. F. Daniel'son, ‘Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshch- estvennogo khoziaistva’, Slovo, no. 10 (October 1880), pp. 77–143. 13. N. F. Daniel'son, Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshchestvennogo khozi- aistva (St Petersburg, 1893). 14. V. V. Vorontsov, Sud'by kapitalizma v Rossii (St Petersburg, 1882).
    [Show full text]
  • The Political and Social Thought of Lewis Corey
    70-13,988 BROWN, David Evan, 19 33- THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL THOUGHT OF LEWIS COREY. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1969 Political Science, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL THOUGHT OF LEWIS COREY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David Evan Brown, B.A, ******* The Ohio State University 1969 Approved by Adviser Department of Political Science PREFACE On December 2 3 , 1952, Lewis Corey was served with a warrant for his arrest by officers of the U, S, Department of Justice. He was, so the warrant read, subject to deportation under the "Act of October 16 , 1 9 1 8 , as amended, for the reason that you have been prior to entry a member of the following class: an alien who is a member of an organi­ zation which was the direct predecessor of the Communist Party of the United States, to wit The Communist Party of America."^ A hearing, originally arranged for April 7» 1953» but delayed until July 27 because of Corey's poor health, was held; but a ruling was not handed down at that time. The Special Inquiry Officer in charge of the case adjourned the hearing pending the receipt of a full report of Corey's activities o during the previous ten years. [The testimony during the hearing had focused primarily on Corey's early writings and political activities.] The hearing was not reconvened, and the question of the defendant's guilt or innocence, as charged, was never formally settled.
    [Show full text]
  • African American Radical Pamphlet Collection
    African American Radical Pamphlet Collection Created by: Thomas Weissinger Professor Emeritus, University Library Professor Emeritus, African American Studies Last updated: 2016 Abrams, Charles. Race Bias in Housing. New York : [s.n.], 1947. “Sponsored jointly by the American Civil Liberties Union, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and American Council on Race Relations.” Rare Book & Manuscript Library 363.510973 AB83R American Civil Liberties Union. Black Justice. New York: ACLU, 1931. Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Baskette Collection, Folder 091, Item 06 _____. Illinois Division. Secret Detention by the Chicago Police: a Report. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1959. Law Compact Stacks. KFX1247.4 .A7X Ames, Jessie Daniel. Democratic processes at work in the South: report of Commission on Interracial Cooperation, Inc., 1939-1941. Atlanta, GA: Commission on Interracial Cooperation, 1941. 21pp. Main Stacks Call Number: 301.451 C736D Amini, Johari. An Afrikan Frame of Reference. Chicago, IL: Institute of Positive Education, 1972. Rare Book & Manuscript Library 305.896073 K962A Amis, B.D. Lynch Justice at Work. New York: Workers’ Library Publishers, 1930. Included in Communist and Radical Pamphlets on Discrimination against Negroes in the U.S. Main Stacks 325.26 C7374 Aptheker, Herbert. John Brown: American Martyr. New York: New Century Publishers, 1960. Main Stacks 973.7116 B81WAP _____. Labor Movement in the South during Slavery. New York: International Publishers, [n.d.]. Main Stacks 331.87Ap8L. _____. Toward Negro Freedom. New York: New Century Publishers, 1956. Main Stacks 352.26 AP49TO c.2 _____. The Negro in the American Revolution. New York: International Publishers, 1940. Rare Book & Manuscript Library 973.315 AP8N _____.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement Capture Or Movement Strategy? a Critical Race History Exchange on the Beginnings of Brown V
    Movement Capture or Movement Strategy? A Critical Race History Exchange on the Beginnings of Brown v. Board Megan Ming Francis & John Fabian Witt In 2019, Megan Ming Francis published a path-breaking article challenging the conventional wisdom in the field on a core piece of civil rights history: the role of a philanthropic foundation called the American Fund for Public Service, also known as the Garland Fund, in working alongside the NAACP to produce the organization’s famous litigation campaign leading to Brown v. Board of Education. Starting in the late 1920s and early 1930s, education came to occupy a central place in the NAACP’s agenda, and education desegregation became the focus of its efforts to break the back of Jim Crow. In Francis’s provocative account, the predominantly white Garland Fund captured the agenda of the civil rights organization through its financial influence, shifting the organization’s central focus from racial violence toward education equality. An organization that had been focused on protecting Black lives from white violence reoriented its attention to a new campaign, which siphoned off resources from other projects, such as workers’ economic rights and Black labor concerns. In this exchange, Francis and legal historian John Fabian Witt debate exactly who captured whom in the relationship between the NAACP and the Garland Fund. Their exchange engages method and substance in the history of civil rights. Among other things, Witt contends that the NAACP’s leadership also subtly coopted the Garland Fund’s resources and turned them toward the civil rights organization’s preexisting objectives rather than vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Board of Directors, the Struggle with Anti-Communism, and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn Douglas Colin Post
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 11-1995 Partisanship within the American Civil Libterties Union: the Board of Directors, the struggle with anti-communism, and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn Douglas Colin Post Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Post, Douglas Colin, "Partisanship within the American Civil Libterties Union: the Board of Directors, the struggle with anti- communism, and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn" (1995). Master's Theses. Paper 803. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Partisanship within the American Civil Liberties Union: the Board of Directors, the Struggle with Anti-communism, and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, 1938-1940. By Douglas Colin Post. Master of Arts in history. University of Richmond. May 1996. Professor R. Barry Westin, thesis director. The American Civil Liberties Union and an overwhelming majority of its historians have maintained that the organization has devoted its efforts solely to the protection of the Bill of Rights. This thesis examines that claim, focusing on the events that culminated in the expulsion of Elizabeth Gurley Flynn from the Union's Board of Directors. Relying primarily on the organization's own publications and archives, as well as several insiders' accounts, the analysis concludes that the issue of communism increasingly polarized the Board and, in a gross violation of its nonpartisan commitment to the defense of civil liberties, led ultimately to the Communist Flynn's removal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of the Party: Experiencing American Communism
    Orion Teal The Life of the Party: Experiencing American Communism Nine years ago, while lost in the serpentine shelves of Powell’s “City of Books” in downtown Portland, Oregon, I discovered two books that would change my life: Nell Irving Painter’s The Narrative of Hosea Hudson: His Life as a Negro Communist in the South (1979) and Robin D.G. Kelley’s Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists in the Great Depression (1990). The fascinating, intertwined stories in the two books kindled my historical imagination, leading me to write a senior thesis exploring African Americans’ interest in the Soviet Union that was a springboard to my studies for my doctoral studies in History at Duke. Painter and Kelley’s works also began a passion for collecting books and ephemera on the American radical tradition. My collection has grown considerably over the years to more than one hundred books on the history of American radicalism and nearly as many pieces of political ephemera, from pinbacks and pamphlets to postcards and posters. The bibliography listed below reflects one of the collection’s strengths: materials that deal with the personal experience of the American Communist Party. Through memoirs, autobiographies, and biographies we can see the politics of American Communism through the eyes of those who lived through the movement’s fleeting triumphs and many tribulations. My interest in the personal side of the American radical experience is directly connected to my dissertation, which examines the role young people played in the New York Left after World War II. The dissertation focuses particularly on the many spaces throughout the city and its environs where young people came into contact with radical ideas, including cooperative housing projects, progressive private schools, summer camps, labor union youth groups, student activist organizations, and secular Jewish shules.
    [Show full text]