DOCSLIB.ORG

Iran's Clandestine War on the Kingdom of Bahrain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iran's Clandestine War on the Kingdom of Bahrain 41 Dirasat Iran’s Clandestine War on the Kingdom of Bahrain: Saraya al Ashtar and the Military Wing of Hezbollah Bahrain Jumada I, 1440 - January 2019 Mitchell Belfer - Khalid Alshaikh Iran’s Clandestine War on the Kingdom of Bahrain: Saraya al Ashtar and the Military Wing of Hezbollah Bahrain Mitchell Belfer - Khalid Alshaikh 4 Dirasat No. 41 Jumada I, 1440 - January 2019 © King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies, 2019 King Fahd National Library Cataloging-In-Publication Data Alshaikh, Khalid - Belfer, Mitchell Irans Clandestine War the Kingdom of Bahrain: Saraya al Ashtar and the Military Wing of. / Alshaikh, Khalid - Belfer, Mitchell . - Riyadh , 2019 (دراسات ؛ p ; 23 x 16.5 cm . - ( 41 32 ISBN: 978-603-8268-00-1 1 - Iraq - Foreign relations 2- Bahrain I - Title II-Series 327.537055 dc 1440/3856 L.D. no. 1440/3856 ISBN: 978-603-8268-00-1 Table of Contents Abstract 6 Introduction and Overview 7 Saraya al Ashtar (SaA) 9 The Al-Wafa Islamic Movement and the SaA 13 The Military Wing of Hezbollah Bahrain (MWHB) 19 Some Impacts to Consider 24 Constraining the Iranian Threat 26 Conclusion 28 5 6 Dirasat No. 41 Jumada I, 1440 - January 2019 Abstract The 1979 Iranian revolution continues to reverberate throughout the Middle East. While many of the more pronounced Iranian proxies, such as the Lebanese Hezbollah and the Houthi militia in Yemen, are the focus of a wide assortment of terror-state explorations, it is important to look at some of the other organizations that Tehran utilizes in pursuit of its regional and international interests. Bahrain, has long been of a strategic interest to the Islamic Republic as it regards it as its Fourteenth Province and a stepping stone to a more direct confrontation with Saudi Arabia. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp prioritizes operations against Bahrain, for Manama has faced a host of radicalized terrorist groups commanded by the IRGC over the years which conducted terrorist attacks and coup attempts. While Bahraini security operations were able to contain most Iranian terrorist groups, the 2011 upheaval in much of the Arab world provided clandestine groups with new opportunities to polarize Bahrain and inspire political violence. This study focuses on several of the main Iran-backed groups to have emerged in Bahrain since 2011. Identifying the so-called: Saraya al Ashtar, along with its political umbrella Al Wafa movement, and the Military Wing of Hezbollah Bahrain, as the main groups, this study seeks to provide an understanding of those organizations since they pose the most pronounced challenge to Bahrain (at present) and to stability in the wider Arab Gulf. Additionally, the study presents and analyses the groups noted above (with reference to their context). It then asseses areas of impact of the groups and concludes with summarizing Bahrain’s measures on how to curtail these groups and their Iranian backers. Introduction and Overview The Islamic Republic of Iran was born and continues to live under the double concepts of taqqiyah and khode, which simultaneously encourage the use of mis- and disinformation and the generation and pursuit of hidden agendas. In a modern political context, this is manifesting itself in the manner in which Iran deploys its propaganda and the way it fights its wars. Iran is heavily involved—and bears responsibility (to a degree) for initiating conflict—in the civil wars and sectarian violence in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, and the Sahel. In those conflicts it is a direct and explicit actor that uses an assortment of its assets in pursuit of its strategic objectives, which include constructing land bridges from Iran to the Mediterranean (such as the Iran- Iraq-Syria highway) and eroding, through various means, regional nodes of traditional stability, such as the countries of the Arab Gulf. These are meant to increase Iran’s geopolitical position and establish a grand pincer with which to surround and pressure Saudi Arabia. Analyzing Iran’s behavior in the region exposes these objectives and the tools it uses to reach them. Iran has been, metaphorically, testing the waters in Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain1 to gauge the level of traction it has to commence and fuel insurgencies in those countries. For the most part, it is not yet able to inspire such activities, but not for lack of trying. Much like its behavior in Lebanon in the early 1980s, Iran is currently developing and utilizing special clandestine organizations imbedded within the Shia communities of the Arab Gulf states to conduct acts of sabotage and terrorism, and to generally stoke sectarian violence. Nowhere is this clearer than in the case of Bahrain: Iran's hardliners claim Bahrain as their fourteenth province (1) Qatar is deliberately omitted from this list, given the recent information about Doha’s duplicity in Iranian actions in the Gulf, coupled with its clear bandwagoning tendencies in the region, which involve engaging both Turkey and Iran on the strategic level, at the expense of its relationship with its traditional allies. 7 8 Dirasat No. 41 Jumada I, 1440 - January 2019 and they are determined to expand their revolution to the Island State. If Iranian claims to Bahrain were regulated as a rhetorical game, few would take notice. However, Iran has been steadily recruiting, training, and ultimately, deploying radicalized members within some of the Bahrani community—who pledge their allegiance to the Islamic Republic—to physically attack Bahrain, both to disrupt that country’s development and cohesion and as a stepping stone to doing the same in Saudi Arabia. Over the decades, Bahrain has faced a variety of terrorist groups that were trained and deployed under the command of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The most formidable challenges in the past have been: (1) the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain (IFLB), (2) the Military Wing of Hezbollah Bahrain (MWHB), and (3) Sacred Defense Bahrain (SDB). While the IFLB was subdued and dismantled following the Shia intifada in the 1990s, many of its proponents evaded arrest and joined the other active groups. The MWHB and the SDB survived into the 2000s and have been joined—in a post-2011 security environment—by several others, including the Youth of 14 February and the Saraya al Ashtar (SaA). Effective police work, coupled with several cases of infighting, thinned the numbers of these organizations, and a process of incorporation began. At present, while the Youth of 14 February remain active, their operations have been reduced to petty vandalism and limited Molotov cocktail attacks on stationary police forces. However, on the other end of the spectrum, Iran has honed the capacities of its two most pronounced agents in Bahrain: the SaA and the MWHB. As such, this study is meant to provide an understanding of those organizations, which currently pose the most pronounced challenge to Bahrain and to stability in the wider Arab Gulf. This study will proceed as follows. First, it presents and analyzes the SaA, followed by the MWHB. Second, the study will assess some areas of potential impact of the groups’ activities in Bahrain. This study will conclude with analyzing the Bahraini security policy toward Iran’s clandestine operatives in the region. Saraya al Ashtar (SaA) Clandestine operations organized and executed by members of an Iran-backed militia—later named Saraya al Ashtar (SaA)—can be traced to 2007. At that time, acts of violence had been greatly reduced as the result of coordinated police actions and high-profile prosecutions. However, a regrouping and incorporation of members of the (then) dissolved IFLB was in process. Although operating without the SaA brand until 2012, the organization existed as a clandestine unit that took advantage of the mounting troubles in early 2011 to form a new, radicalized terrorist group in Bahrain. As part of their training exercises, young men in the SaA (all from the Shia sect) from some of Bahrain’s villages—for example, Sanabis, Sitra, Diraz, Daih, and Bani Jamra—began the process of militarizing demonstrations by using political dissent as a means of triggering strategic riots aimed at attacking Bahrain’s security forces.2 The process followed a pattern: First, groups of young men and women would stage a march or protest in one of the Shia villages. The police would be present but would not engage with the protesters. From behind the main part of the protest lines, young SaA members would pelt security personnel with stones. The police would then attempt to arrest those engaging in stone throwing, which poses a danger to public safety. In response, the SaA trainees would scatter and regroup behind prearranged street barricades. Tires would be set ablaze and small arsenals of Molotov cocktails would be hurled at security force vehicles and riot police. At the time, such acts were seen as the last embers of the violent intifada from the (2) See Mitchell Belfer, Small State, Dangerous Region: A Strategic Assessment of Bahrain (Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing, 2014), pp. 202–240. 9 10 Dirasat No. 41 Jumada I, 1440 - January 2019 previous decade. However, they were, in fact, training exercises for far more violent and coordinated campaigns that came to fruition in the wake of the 2011–2012 wave of public violence. While many in Europe applauded the 2011 events in Bahrain, such an approach was misguided. Bahrain was not facing a human rights–centered protest only, but rather a new form of Iranian-supported public violence. As a result, Bahrain was forced to deal with the opportunistic SaA, which sought to exploit the regional upheaval and deploy its fighters to engage Bahrain’s security forces.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing Iranian Soft Power in the Arab World from Google Trends
    The Journal for Interdisciplinary Middle Eastern Studies Volume 4, Spring 2019, pp. 33-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26351/JIMES/4/2 ISSN: 2522-347X (print); 2522-6959 (online) Assessing Iranian Soft Power in the Arab World from Google Trends Hillel Frisch Abstract Iran’s hard power in Lebanon is well-known. At its beck and call are the Hezbollah militia − the powerful military force through which it largely controls the Lebanese state, the many militias operating under the umbrella of the Popular Mobilization Force in Iraq, as well as links in the Palestinian arena to al-Jihad al-Islami and to Hamas. This is hardly true of its soft power. Analyzing search results presented by Google Trends, Iran’s soft power reach seems to be limited to the states with Shi’ite populations, especially in Lebanon and Bahrain. The country’s soft power is more tenuous in Iraq, the country with a majority of Shi’ites, who also represent the majority of Arabic speaking Shi’ites. Analysis of Google Trends searches suggests that Iraq is a spiritual center competing with Iran, among the smaller Shi’ite centers of population in Lebanon and Bahrain − where Shi’ite identity seems to be the most salient. While Arabic speaking Shi’ites evince interest in Iran, the Iranian public hardly reciprocates with interest in Shi’ites in the Arab world, a reflection of a center-periphery relationship between Iran and transnational Shi’ites. Keywords: Iran, soft power, Google Trends, Shi`ites, Arab world, Iraq, Lebanon, Bahrain Prof. Hillel Frisch – Bar-Ilan University, Israel; [email protected] 33 34 Hillel Frisch Introduction Iran’s hard power in Lebanon is well known.
    [Show full text]
  • CTC Sentinel Objective
    APRIL 2011 . VOL 4 . ISSUE 4 COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER AT WEST POINT CTC SENTINel OBJECTIVE . RELEVANT . RIGOROUS Contents Saudi Arabia Moves to FEATURE ARTICLE 1 Saudi Arabia Moves to Maintain Maintain Regime Stability Regime Stability By Toby Craig Jones By Toby Craig Jones REPORTS 4 Ayman al-Zawahiri’s Reaction to Revolution in the Middle East By Nelly Lahoud 7 How the Arab Spring Could Embolden Extremists By Philip Mudd 9 Are Islamist Extremists Fighting Among Libya’s Rebels? By Alison Pargeter 13 Bahrain: Crushing a Challenge to the Royal Family By Caryle Murphy 16 JI Operative Umar Patek Arrested in Pakistan By Zachary Abuza 18 The Implications of Colonel Imam’s Murder in Pakistan By Rahimullah Yusufzai Saudi King Abdullah has taken a number of steps to maintain regime stability in the kingdom. - Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images 20 Recent Highlights in Terrorist Activity audi arabia has not come Although it has been beset with the 24 CTC Sentinel Staff & Contacts through the recent unrest threat of militancy and terrorism, most sweeping the Middle East notably from al-Qa`ida in the Arabian unchanged. The kingdom has yet Peninsula (AQAP), Saudi Arabia’s Sto see the kind of popular uprisings that political order has not been imperiled brought down regimes in Tunisia and seriously in recent years. Where Egypt and that are threatening autocrats dissidents elsewhere have been calling in Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Bahrain. Yet for the overthrow of authoritarian leaders in Riyadh are deeply concerned governments, those calling for change about regional political developments About the CTC Sentinel in Saudi Arabia are more interested in and what it might mean for stability accommodation than revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sunni and Shiite Axes in the Middle East
    The Sunni and Shiite Axes in the Middle East Sima Shine 2QHRIWKHGH¿QLQJFKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIWKH0LGGOH(DVWRIUHFHQW\HDUVKDV been the worsening crisis between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and the efforts on both sides to consolidate regional coalitions in order to increase their regional LQÀXHQFH2YHUWKHODVWGHFDGHWKHUHJLRQZLWQHVVHGDVHULHVRIGUDPDWLF developments, caused by both endogenous and exogenous factors, while in the background the Saudi-led Sunni axis and the Iran-led Shiite axis took shape. On the one hand, the region saw the collapse of some Arab states as a result of their populations’ pent-up disappointment with the oppressive regimes that were unable to meet civilian needs. This development, along with the failure of secular pan-Arabism, paved the way for the rise of political Islam and the return of religion – in itself fertile ground for factionalism and sectarianism – to the region’s political arena. The strengthening of the Sunni sector, which lacked a universally recognized spiritual-religious center, HQDEOHGWKHGHYHORSPHQWRIDUDQJHRI6XQQLJURXSVZKRDUHQRZ¿JKWLQJ each other while exploiting the disintegration of some state frameworks, and QXUWXULQJWKH6XQQL6KLLWHFRQÀLFW2QWKHRWKHUKDQGWKH$PHULFDQLQYDVLRQ RI,UDTWKHUHPRYDORI6DGGDP+XVVHLQ¶V6XQQLUHJLPHDQGWKHULVHRIWKH 6KLLWHPDMRULW\OHGWRWKH¿UVWHYHU6KLLWHUHJLPHLQDQ$UDEFRXQWU\DQG paved the way for Iran’s massive entry to the arena. This is how the “Shiite FUHVFHQW´FRPSULVLQJ,UDQ,UDT6\ULDDQG/HEDQRQZDVIRUPHG7KHZDU in Yemen, in which Iran is aiding the Shiite-allied Houthis, strengthened WKHLPDJHRIWKHVSUHDGRI,UDQLDQLQÀXHQFHIURPWKH*XOIDQGWKH6WUDLWRI Hormuz to the Mandeb Strait and the Red Sea. 141 Sima Shine At the heart of the rising tension and rivalry is the relationship between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which has known many ups and downs in the almost four decades since the Islamic Revolution in Iran and Ayatollah Khomeini’s blunt statement that the House of Saud must be overthrown.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations A/HRC/30/NGO/26
    United Nations A/HRC/30/NGO/26 General Assembly Distr.: General 3 September 2015 English only Human Rights Council Thirtieth session Agenda item 4 Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention Written statement* submitted by the Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain Inc, a non- governmental organization in special consultative status The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. [26 August 2015] * This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting non- governmental organization(s). GE.15-14914(E) *1514914* A/HRC/30/NGO/26 Human rights abuses in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB) would like to use the occasion of the 30th Session of the Human Rights Council to call attention to the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the State of Qatar’s continued human rights abuses. Throughout 2015, these countries have acted to suppress free speech and assembly by imprisoning peaceful activists on arbitrary charges. Torture and ill-treatment of detainees at the hands of security forces remain pervasive issues in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. The Government of Bahrain has made no significant progress towards cooperating with UN human rights mechanisms in 2015. Arbitrary detentions of peaceful opposition activists and human rights defenders have continued unchecked. Bahrain’s growing restrictions on free speech have contributed to a situation where the government detains activists with impunity, while laws criminalizing insults to the king, government or national emblems and banning protests have curtailed free expression.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK's Relations with Saudi Arabia and Bahrain
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee The UK’s relations with Saudi Arabia and Bahrain Fifth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 12 November 2013 Published on 22 November 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated agencies. Current membership Rt Hon Richard Ottaway (Conservative, Croydon South) (Chair) Mr John Baron (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell (Liberal Democrat, North East Fife) Rt Hon Ann Clwyd (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes (Labour/Co-op, Ilford South) Mark Hendrick (Labour/Co-op, Preston) Sandra Osborne (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Andrew Rosindell (Conservative, Romford) Mr Frank Roy (Labour, Motherwell and Wishaw) Rt Hon Sir John Stanley (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Rory Stewart (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the parliament: Rt Hon Bob Ainsworth (Labour, Coventry North East) Emma Reynolds (Labour, Wolverhampton North East) Mr Dave Watts (Labour, St Helens North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including news items) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/facom.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators Must Face Justice
    Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators must Face Justice A Report by the Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) March 2021 Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators must Face Justice I. Executive Summary 3 II. Methodology 4 III. Introduction 5 1. Patterns of Torture 6 1.1 The Prevalence of Torture in the Bahraini Justice System and Extraction of Confessions by Torture 6 1.2 Gross Violations of Fair Trial Rights and Due Process: The Admissibility of Confessions Extracted by Torture in Criminal Proceedings 10 1.3 The Use of Torture and its Chilling Effect on Exercising the Rights to Freedom of Expression, Assembly and Association 11 1.4 Torture and Travel Bans in Reprisal against Human Rights Defenders who Interact with International Human Rights Mechanisms 12 2. Ending the Culture of Impunity: Ensuring that Perpetrators of Torture are Held Accountable 14 2.1 Tackling the Culture of Impunity within Bahrain 14 2.2 Ensuring International Accountability by Moving Away from a Culture of Complicity in the International Community 15 3. Conclusion 20 4. Recommendations 21 4.1 Recommendations to the Government of Bahrain 21 4.2 Recommendations to the International Community 21 2 Patterns of Torture in Bahrain: Perpetrators must Face Justice I. Executive Summary This report provides a comprehensive overview of the specific ways and means by which torture is perpetrated in Bahrain, with a particular focus on the period since the 2011 popular movement and the violent crackdown that followed. The report documents the widespread use of forms of
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and Bahrain's February 14Th Movement Based on Goldstone's Fourth Generation Theory
    Science Arena Publications Specialty Journal of Politics and Law ISSN: 2520-3282 Available online at www.sciarena.com 2018, Vol, 3 (4): 62-78 A Comparative Analysis of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and Bahrain's February 14th Movement Based on Goldstone's Fourth Generation Theory Ehsan Bagheri Dana1, Alireza Beygi1, Peyman Hassani2* 1 Islamic Studies and Political Science, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran, 2 Islamic Studies and Law, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran. *Corresponding Author Abstract: The comparative analysis of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and Bahrain's February 14th movement as two Islamic countries which have been highly affected by each other in various fields is of great importance. By adapting the most critical Western ideas about the Islamic Revolution of Iran and analyzing its similarities and differences with Bahrain's February 14th movement, some of their most significant similarities and differences can be found. The " Goldstone's fourth generation " theory, which was presented as one of the late theories in the cause of the revolution, was evaluated by some scholars of the Islamic revolution in Iran and is still under investigation. The present study aimed at explaining the similarities and differences between the two events and evaluate the influence Bahrain’s movement from the Islamic Revolution of Iran through the comparative analysis of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and Bahrain's February 14th movement based on Goldstone's fourth generation theory. The findings of this study which were obtained based on a descriptive- analytical method and collection of sources based on the library and interviews with elite indicated that the Bahrain’s system in Bahrain's February 14th movement attempted to deny the effect of the Iranian revolution on Bahrain and introduce Bahrain's developments due to religious differences between Shiite and Sunni.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Torture Is the Policy and Impunity Is the Norm
    Bahrain: Torture is the Policy and Impunity is the Norm A Report by the Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) produced in cooperation with the Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) with support from the European Union February 2021 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Methodology and Resources 3 III. Main Acronyms 4 IV. Background 4 V. Bahrain’s International Obligations Regarding Torture 6 VI. Practices of the Security Agencies in Detention Centres 8 VII. The Officials Involved in Torture Practices 9 VIII. Victims and Survivors of the Practices of the Security Agencies 13 Political Activists and Human Rights Defenders 14 On Death Row or Already Executed 19 Protesters 20 Summary Table of Victims of Torture in Bahrain 21 IX. Recommendations 23 2 I. Introduction Bahrain has witnessed several uprisings throughout its contemporary history. Since before its independence, different popular movements have sought the same goal; a democratic society with equal rights. These peaceful movements have been faced with force and resulted in increased repression. The last popular movement of February 2011 was no different. From the first day of the 2011 popular movement, the Bahraini government chose to resort to force to end the peaceful demonstrations. Many protesters were killed because of the security forces’ brutality, either on the streets or under torture in the detention centres. Local and international reports have documented hundreds of cases of torture and ill-treatment. The UN concerned bodies and different international organisations have called on the Bahraini government to address the violations and end impunity. Almost a decade has passed since 14 February 2011, and nothing has changed.
    [Show full text]
  • North Afr I CA M Iddle East
    / NorTh AFrica/ Middle eAsT observatory for the protection of human rights defenders annual report 2009 …439 / regIoNAl ANALYSIs NorTh AFrICA / mIDDLE eAsT observatory for the protection of human rights defenders annual report 2009 The entry into force in March 2008 of the Arab Charter on Human Rights, binding the States of North Africa and the Middle East that ratified it, contrasts with the persistent human rights violations and the many obstacles to the defence of human rights noted in this region in 2008. This text, in spite of some weak points, includes provisions that may help to advance the recognition of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the region and in addition provides for the creation of an Arab Human Rights Committee responsible for monitoring applica- tion of the Charter and whose work was due to begin in the first half of 2009. Nonetheless, apart from the fact that, at the end of 2008, only 27 of the Member States of the League of Arab States had ratified 1 the Arab Charter on Human Rights , several provisions remain not consistent with international human rights standards and instruments. As an example, the Charter stipulates that national legislation may take precedence over the provisions of the text, notably for security reasons. This provision, which calls into question the principle of the legal superiority of international and regional instruments over national legislation, risks restricting implementation of the Charter, especially in countries where massive human rights violations under the pretext of national security are witnessed. Human rights defenders were not spared in the persistent and resur- gent internal conflicts in certain countries of the region: they were subjected to assassinations (Iraq), arbitrary detentions (Yemen) and obstacles to their freedom of movement (Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territories) throughout the year in these countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Updates on the Crackdown on Human Rights in Bahrain
    Issue #2 September 2016 Updates on the Crackdown on Human Rights in Bahrain Enclosed a report on the 33rd session of the Human Rights council 400 Students Remain Detained with Launch of Academic Year The founder and president of the Bahrain Teach- ers’ Association (BTA), and assistant Secretary General of the Arab Teachers Union, Mahdi Abu Deeb, said on his Twitter account, “while students wear their school costumes, carry their school bags and go to their schools, there are 400 stu- dents that are detained and deprived from the right to education.” He, also, confirmed that it is the government’s full responsibility to overcome all hardships for the sake of the right to education, rath- er than create hardships. Therefore, “each detained student is in their protection as long as they are detained.” Mahdi Abu Deeb A Bahraini Boy Kept in Solitary Confinement On Sunday (September 4, 2016) Mostafa al-Motgha- wi (16 years old), the brother of the activist Ahmad al-Motghawi, received a summon to be present for interrogation at the Budaiya Police Station where he was arrested and kept in custody in the following day over charges of demonstrating in Duraz. On Wednes- day (September 7, 2016), Mostafa was transferred to the criminal investigations department building, despite the prosecutions’ deci- sion to release him. His lawyer and family members Mostafa al-Motghawi were not allowed to visit him. On Sunday (September 18, 2016), the tion. Bahraini authorities released Mostafa The two boys face charges related 12 days following his arrest. to taking part in Duraz protest that In a similar move, the authorities de- has being ongoing since over 90 days cided to detain boy Ali Mohammad Al- against revoking the citizenship of Aya- Moamen for 7 days pending investiga- tollah Sheikh Isa Qassim.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 465.03 Kb
    Regional Overview – Middle East 5 March 2019 acleddata.com/2019/03/05/regional-overview-middle-east-5-march-2019/ Tom Hart March 5, 2019 Throughout the Middle East region last week, overall instances of battles continued to decrease, while remote violence events, such as airstrikes and IED attacks, also decreased following a two-month upward trend. Despite this, reported fatalities increased significantly, especially in Yemen, where the above trends were reversed. Demonstration events, meanwhile, decreased across all countries in the region. In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was the main focal point of news reports last week. On 28 February, a UN Human Rights Council probe concluded that Israeli soldiers may have committed war crimes and/or crimes against humanity in their response to the Great Return marches in Gaza, which included the fatal shooting of medics, journalists, children, and disabled persons (Times of Israel, 28 February 2019). On the same day, Israel’s attorney general announced his intention to indict Netanyahu for bribery, fraud, and other charges with just 40 days before his re-election run (New York Times, 28 February 2019). In response, Israelis took to the street of Tel Aviv and demonstrated for his resignation. Whilst hundreds of Israelis took part in the demonstration against the PM, there were reports of only a few dozen demonstrating in his support. Meanwhile, in the southern province, a number of incendiary balloons were launched across the border from Gaza throughout the week. One such balloon exploded mid-air and caused damage to a number of homes in the Eshkol Regional Council, while another caused a fire in Kissufim forest.
    [Show full text]