Pnads254.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pnads254.Pdf THE WAMI RIVER INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW ASSESSMENT Synthesis Report, June 2008 WAMI RIVER INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW ASSESSMENT TEAM Project leaders: Mr. Julius Sarmett Dr. Elizabeth Anderson Basin Water Officer Deputy Director Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Office Global Water for Sustainability Program Tanzania Ministry of Water Florida International University, USA Ms. Appa Mandari WADA project coordinator Tanzania Coastal Management Partnership Scientific experts: Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Office: Mr. Mligo Cosmos, Riparian Specialist Mr. Ernest Lema University of Dar es Salaam Project Coordinator Ms. Pendo Hyera, Sociologist Eng. M.D. Rukiko Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Office Project Coordinator Dr. Phillip Mwanukuzi, Geomorphologist Eng. Misigaro Kigadye University of Dar es Salaam Project Coordinator Dr. P. M. Ndomba, Hydraulic Engineer Mr. Ebbo Makalinga University of Dar es Salaam Project Assistant Dr. Rashid Tamatamah, Aquatic Ecologist University of Dar es Salaam Project Assistant: Catherine McNally Dr. Patrick Valimba, Hydrologist Doctoral Student University of Dar es Salaam University of Rhode Island, USA ii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD................................................................................................................. IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................... V LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................... VI LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................ VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................2 CHAPTER 2: THE WAMI RIVER SUB-BASIN: PAST AND PRESENT .........................10 CHAPTER 3: RESULTS OF FIELD STUDIES (2007) AT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW ASSESSMENT SITES.......................................................................................25 CHAPTER 4: THE WAMI INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW ASSESSMENT: PROCESS AND PRODUCTS............................................................................57 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND THE FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR THE WAMI RIVER SUB-BASIN .......................................................................................................70 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................75 APPENDIX 1: RECOMMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES FOR EFA STUDY SITES...................................................................................77 APPENDIX 2: DATA UNCERTAINTIES AND RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR FIVE STUDY SITES IN THE WAMI RIVER SUB-BASIN ............................................84 APPENDIX 3: FLOW ASSESSMENT FORMS FROM DECEMBER 2007 WORKSHOP ..........................................................................................................................90 iii FOREWORD Environmental Flow Assessment (EFA) is a new concept in Tanzania, but the role it plays in enabling integrated management of water resources is vital and should not be underestimated. The overall objective of an EFA is to develop quantitative guidelines for management of flows in rivers. An EFA is a tool used to draw the line between the amount of water that can be withdrawn from a river for human uses and the amount of water that the river needs to sufficiently maintain ecosystems. The emergent product is a quantitative estimate of the flow needs of the river and, in some cases, a consideration of the different human uses of water. Tanzania’s new water policy, by according the environment second priority as a user of water, provides the necessary legal backing for the EFA process. However, to date few rivers in Tanzania have been subjected to this detailed assessment. As described in this document, the Wami project is a pioneering EFA effort as a Tanzanian-led project and a proactive approach to management. It falls alongside other notable EFA efforts in the country, such as those in the Pangani, Mara, and Rufiji (Ruaha) river basins. With this initiative the Country has substantively benefited in terms of the findings that have accrued out of this project and the experience gained by our staff who were involved in the study. It is recommended therefore that water resources experts should spend some time exploring this report and make use of the findings to establish a study similar to this one for river systems in the entire country. I also urge the policy makers to make use of EFA findings as a decision-making tool for sustainable development of the society which depends on water resources as a source of livelihood. We should not wait until when all rivers have gone dry and the ecosystem collapse, since it is difficult, costly and time consuming to reverse the process, even if we would wish doing it. Julius D. Sarmett Wami/Ruvu Basin Water Officer 4 June 2008 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Wami River Initial Environmental Flow Assessment (Wami IEFA) project was a process-based approach to determining flow requirements of the Wami River and its related ecosystems, as a means for enabling more sustainable water management in the Wami River Sub-Basin. This project would not have been possible without the dedication, hard work, and strong collaborative spirit of the Wami IEFA team. In particular, the scientific experts should be acknowledged for the energy and professionalism that they brought to the project and the entire team benefited from their generosity in sharing their knowledge. Special thanks go to the University of Dar es Salaam for permitting their involvement. The staff of the Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Office (WRBWO) should also be recognized for their enthusiasm and support to the project, and for facilitating access to valuable information about the Wami River Sub-Basin, without which the flow assessments would not have been possible. It is hoped that the WRBWO staff have increased their knowledge of river ecosystems through participation in this project, and that the scientific experts now have a greater understanding of the decisions facing water managers in Tanzania following their collaboration with the WRBWO. Logistical and administrative support in Tanzania was provided by the Wami-Ruvu Basin Water Office, as well as the Tanzania Coastal Management Partnership (TCMP). The staff members of TCMP deserve acknowledgements for their efforts to offer guidance on the Wami IEFA project (Jeremiah Daffa, Baraka Kalangahe), to coordinate the Wami IEFA project with other related activities (Appa Mandari), and to assist with management funds for the project (Esther Kapinga). The drivers and other support staff of TCMP also provided needed assistance to the Wami IEFA project. Special thanks go to the Tanzanian Ministry of Water, in particular Washington Mutayoba, Elizabeth Nkini, and Saidi A. Faraji, for their support of the Wami IEFA initiative from beginning to end. It is hoped that this project and the lessons learned from the Wami IEFA provide an example for other basin water offices in Tanzania. Thanks also go to Saadani National Park, in particular the park ecologist, Halima Ramadhani, who lent valuable support as a voice for the park and the Wami River estuary. Funding for this project was provided by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Coca-Cola Company, as a component of the Tanzania Water and Development Alliance (WADA). We are grateful to the Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island, in particular Don Robadue and Jim Tobey, for the initial invitation to work with the Tanzania WADA program and for continued support throughout the project. The USAID Global Water for Sustainability Program, based at Florida International University, was also instrumental in providing complementary financial and administrative support, as well as technical guidance on the project. Special thanks go to Andrea Lamelas and Dr. Michael McClain at Florida International University. Dr. Jay O’Keeffe of the UNESCO-IHE was helpful with ideas on how to approach the Wami River project during its planning phases. Amanda Subalusky and John Stiefel provided valuable editorial assistance in the preparation of documents. We also would like to specially acknowledge Michael McClain, Jeremiah Daffa and Jim Tobey, who provided the initial impetus and idea for this project following a May 2006 visit to the Wami River, and who supported the Wami IEFA team throughout the project. v LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1. The Wami/Ruvu Basin Water Office: Vision, Mission, Core Values, and Main Responsibilities....................................................................................................5 Table 1.2. The Steps Process for the Wami Initial Environmental Flows Assessment .....7 Table 2.1. Major rivers of the Wami River Sub-Basin. ...................................................12 Table 2.2. Number of endemic vertebrate and tree species in Eastern Arc Forests in the Wami River Sub-Basin (Source: Burgess, 2005) ...............................................17 Table 2.3. Fishes reported from the Wami River and its tributaries, based on collections by Bernacsek 1980, Eccles 1992, and Tamatamah 2007. ........................................19 Table 2.4: Distribution of population by some districts in Wami River ............................22 Table 2.5. River resource use in the Wami River
Recommended publications
  • Forest Cover and Change for the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya Circa 2000 to Circa 2010
    Forest cover and change for the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya circa 2000 to circa 2010 Final report Karyn Tabor, Japhet J. Kashaigili, Boniface Mbilinyi, and Timothy M. Wright Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Biodiversity Values of the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests ....................................... 2 1.2 The threats to the forests ............................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Trends in deforestation ................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 The importance of monitoring ...................................................................................................... 8 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 study area ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Mapping methodology ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Habitat change statistics ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Map validation
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH NGURU MOUNTAINS: a Description of the Biophysical Landscape
    TANZANIA FOREST CONSERVATION GROUP TECHNICAL PAPER 11 SOUTH NGURU MOUNTAINS: a description of the biophysical landscape Nike Doggart and David Loserian (Ed.) 2007 Participatory Environmental Management Programme (PEMA) Suggested citation: Whole report Published by the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group © Tanzania Forest Conservation Group All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group as the copyright owner. Doggart, N. and D. Loserian (eds.) (2007). South Nguru Mountains: A Description of the biophysical landscape. TFCG Technical Paper No 11. DSM Tz pp 1 – 71. Sections within the report: Kiure, J. & N. Doggart (2007). Birds of the South Nguru Mountains. In: Doggart, N. and D. Loserian (eds.) (2007). South Nguru Mountains: A Description of the biophysical landscape. TFCG Technical Paper No 11. DSM Tz pp 1 – 71. ISSN 0856-8618 ISBN 9987-8958-2-4 Key words: Biodiversity, endemic, South Nguru Mountains, Eastern Arc Mountains, Mvomero, Tanzania, Kanga Forest Reserve, Mkindo Forest Reserve. Front cover photographs (clockwise from top left): Callulina sp. nov. is one of the new species of amphibian recorded during the surveys. Photo by Michele Menegon, 2005. Charcoal harvested from woodland near Kanga. Photo by David Loserian 2005. Leopard caught on a camera trap in Kanga. View of the South Nguru landscape from Kanga F.R. Photo by Andrew Perkin. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Perception and Indicators of Climate Change, Its Impacts, Available Mitigation Strategies in Rice Growing Communities Adjoining Eastern Arc Mountains
    Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 5(5): 267-279, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujar.2017.050503 Perception and Indicators of Climate Change, Its Impacts, Available Mitigation Strategies in Rice Growing Communities Adjoining Eastern Arc Mountains Kashenge Sophia1,*, Makoninde Emmanuel2 1Agriculture Research Institute – Dakawa, Tanzania 2Kilimanjaro Agriculture Training Center (KATC), Tanzania *Corresponding Authors: [email protected], [email protected] Copyright©2017 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract Ongoing forest disturbances in the areas Tanzania. According to TFCG [19], Eastern Arc Mountains adjoining the Eastern Arc Mountains in Kilombero District originally encompass 23,700 sq. km and stretch in scattered associated with growing population and farm expansion led mountain blocks from the Taita Hills in southern Kenya to to increasing land degradation and fluctuations of the Udzungwa Mountains in southern Tanzania. The main hydrological supply downstream. This threatens not only mountains, from north to south, are: Taita Hills, North and biodiversity but also irrigated rice productivity. A structured South Pare, West and East Usambara, North and South Interview in conjunction with awareness creation was Nguru, Ukaguru, Uluguru, Rubeho, and Udzungwa. These carried out in seven villages (Chita, Mbingu, Kisegese, series of isolated mountains have been heavily covered by Namawala, Mpofu, Njage and Mofu) to determine level of forests and are recognized as one of 34 globally important understanding among rice growers on the potential of these "hot spots" for forest biodiversity according to Conservation mountains for sustainable water flow downstream and the International [7].
    [Show full text]
  • Published Version
    PUBLISHED VERSION Francesco Rovero, Michele Menegon, Jon Fjeldså, Leah Collett, Nike Doggart, Charles Leonard, Guy Norton, Nisha Owen, Andrew Perkin, Daniel Spitale, Antje Ahrends and Neil D. Burgess Targeted vertebrate surveys enhance the faunal importance and improve explanatory models within the Eastern Arc Mountains of Kenya and Tanzania Diversity and Distributions, 2014; 20(12):1438-1449 © 2014 The Authors. Diversity and Distributions published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. PERMISSIONS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ http://hdl.handle.net/2440/96625 Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2014) 20, 1438–1449 BIODIVERSITY Targeted vertebrate surveys enhance the RESEARCH faunal importance and improve explanatory models within the Eastern Arc Mountains of Kenya and Tanzania Francesco Rovero1,2*, Michele Menegon1, Jon Fjeldsa3, Leah Collett4, Nike Doggart5, Charles Leonard5, Guy Norton4, Nisha Owen6,7, Andrew Perkin5, Daniel Spitale1, Antje Ahrends8 and Neil D. Burgess3,9,10 1Tropical Biodiversity Section, ABSTRACT MUSE- Museo delle Scienze, Corso del Aim Detailed knowledge of species distributions, endemism patterns and Lavoro e della Scienza 3, Trento 38123, 2 threats is critical to site prioritization and conservation planning. However, Italy, Udzungwa Ecological Monitoring Centre, Udzungwa Mountains National data from biodiversity inventories are still limited, especially for tropical forests, Park, P.O. Box 99, Mang’ula, Tanzania, and even well recognized hotspots remain understudied.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile EASTERN AFROMONTANE BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT FINAL VERSION 24 JANUARY 2012 Prepared by: BirdLife International with the technical support of: Conservation International / Science and Knowledge Division IUCN Global Species Programme – Freshwater Unit IUCN –Eastern Africa Plant Red List Authority Saudi Wildlife Authority Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants The Cirrus Group UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre WWF - Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund And support from the International Advisory Committee Neville Ash, UNEP Division of Environmental Policy Implementation; Elisabeth Chadri, MacArthur Foundation; Fabian Haas, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology; Matthew Hall, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Centre for Middle Eastern Plants; Sam Kanyamibwa, Albertine Rift Conservation Society; Jean-Marc Froment, African Parks Foundation; Kiunga Kareko, WWF, Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme Office; Karen Laurenson, Frankfurt Zoological Society; Leo Niskanen, IUCN Eastern & Southern Africa Regional Programme; Andy Plumptre, Wildlife Conservation Society; Sarah Saunders, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Lucy Waruingi, African Conservation Centre. Drafted by the ecosystem profiling team: Ian Gordon, Richard Grimmett, Sharif Jbour, Maaike Manten, Ian May, Gill Bunting (BirdLife International) Pierre Carret, Nina Marshall, John Watkin (CEPF) Naamal de Silva, Tesfay Woldemariam, Matt Foster (Conservation International)
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem: Eastern Arc Mountains & Coastal Forests of Tanzania & Kenya
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE EASTERN ARC MOUNTAINS & COASTAL FORESTS OF TANZANIA & KENYA Final version July 31, 2003 (updated: march 2005) Prepared by: Conservation International International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology In collaboration with: Nature Kenya Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania With the technical support of: Centre for Applied Biodiversity Science - Conservation International East African Herbarium National Museums of Kenya Missouri Botanical Garden Tanzania Forest Conservation Group Zoology Department, University of Dar es Salaam WWF Eastern Africa Regional Programme Office WWF United States And a special team for this ecosystem profile: Neil Burgess Tom Butynski Ian Gordon Quentin Luke Peter Sumbi John Watkin Assisted by experts and contributors: KENYA Hamdan Sheha Idrissa Perkin Andrew Barrow Edmund Howell Kim Verberkmoes Anne Marie Gakahu Chris Kajuni A R Ward Jessica Githitho Anthony Kilahama Felician Kabii Tom Kafumu George R BELGIUM Kimbwereza Elly D Kabugi Hewson Lens Luc Kanga Erustus Lejora Inyasi A.V. Matiku Paul Lulandala Luther Mbora David Mallya Felix UK Mugo Robinson Mariki Stephen Burgess Neil Ndugire Naftali Masayanyika Sammy Odhiambo Peter Mathias Lema USA Thompson Hazell Milledge Simon Brooks Thomas Wandago Ben Mlowe Edward Gereau Roy Mpemba Erastp Langhammer Penny Msuya Charles TANZANIA Ocker Donnell Mungaya Elias Sebunya Kaddu Baldus Rolf D Mwasumbi Leonard Bhukoli Alice Struhsaker Tom Salehe John Wieczkowski Julie Doggart Nike Stodsrod Jan Erik Howlett David Tapper Elizabeth Hewawasam Indu Offninga
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Vertebrate Surveys Enhance the Faunal Importance and Improve
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2014) 20, 1438–1449 BIODIVERSITY Targeted vertebrate surveys enhance the RESEARCH faunal importance and improve explanatory models within the Eastern Arc Mountains of Kenya and Tanzania Francesco Rovero1,2*, Michele Menegon1, Jon Fjeldsa3, Leah Collett4, Nike Doggart5, Charles Leonard5, Guy Norton4, Nisha Owen6,7, Andrew Perkin5, Daniel Spitale1, Antje Ahrends8 and Neil D. Burgess3,9,10 1Tropical Biodiversity Section, ABSTRACT MUSE- Museo delle Scienze, Corso del Aim Detailed knowledge of species distributions, endemism patterns and Lavoro e della Scienza 3, Trento 38123, 2 threats is critical to site prioritization and conservation planning. However, Italy, Udzungwa Ecological Monitoring Centre, Udzungwa Mountains National data from biodiversity inventories are still limited, especially for tropical forests, Park, P.O. Box 99, Mang’ula, Tanzania, and even well recognized hotspots remain understudied. We provide an exam- 3Center for Macroecology, Evolution and ple of how updated knowledge on species occurrence from strategically directed Climate, Natural History Museum of biodiversity surveys can change knowledge on perceived biodiversity impor- A Journal of Conservation Biogeography Denmark, University of Copenhagen, tance, and facilitate understanding diversity patterns and the delivery of conser- Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen vation recommendations. DK-2100, Denmark, 4Animal Behaviour Location Eastern Arc Mountains (EAM), Kenya and Tanzania. Research Unit, Mikumi National Park, P.O. Box 75, Mikumi, Tanzania, 5Tanzania Methods We surveyed amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals during 2005– Forest Conservation Group, P.O. Box 23410, 2009, targeting mountain blocks that had been poorly surveyed or unsurveyed Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 6Society for by the early Noughties. We combined new and old data to produce a database Environmental Exploration/Frontier, 60-62 of species presence by mountain block spanning four decades of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania's Nature Reserves
    THE ARC JOURNAL ISSUE 30 Biannual Newsletter Issue No. 30 May 2017 This Edition of the Arc Journal is focused on Tanzania’s 12 Nature Forest Reserves. It includes descriptions of each of the 12 reserves as well as information on their biodiversity, threats, management and tourism SPECIAL opportunities. View of Mkingu Nature Reserve. ISSUE Photo by Rob Beechey. Tanzania’s Nature Reserves Introducing Tanzania’s Nature Reserves coastal forests in southern Tanzania (Rondo) and one encompasses the forests of a recently dormant Prof. Dos Santos, Head of the Tanzania Forest Services Agency volcano (Mount Hanang). The last one (Minziro) In Tanzania, the Forest Legislation of 2002 recognises includes areas of lowland swamp forest close to the Nature Forest Reserves as protected forest areas of Uganda border that is of similar composition to the particularly high importance for the conservation of forests of the Congo Basin. biodiversity. Formation of Nature Reserves started in These 12 Nature Forest Reserves are being managed the 1990s with the gazettement of the Amani Nature by dedicated conservators distributed at each site, Reserve in the East Usambara Mountains. supported by teams of professional staff. At the Since 2002, the government has been working to TFS headquarters the Nature Forest Reserves fall identify and upgrade the status of a network of key under the section that manages the natural forests sites for conservation that were already under the of Tanzania. management of the Tanzania Forest Services (TFS) TFS is committed to improving the management Agency. There are two portfolios of Nature Forest and conservation of these sites and aims to Reserve – firstly within the Eastern Arc Mountains, generate sustainable sources of revenue for both the whilst the other portfolio includes the best examples management of the reserves and also to help support of other forests in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kilosa District REDD+ Pilot Project, Tanzania
    Adam B.S. Mwakalobo, Khamaldin Mutabazi Khamaldin B.S. Mwakalobo, Adam pilot project, Tanzania project, pilot Kilosa District REDD+ The A socioeconomic baseline survey George C. Kajembe, Dos Santos A.Silayo, A.Silayo, Santos Dos C. Kajembe, George REDD+ COUNTRY rePORT First published by the International Institute for Environment and Development (UK) in 2013 Copyright © International Institute for Environment and Development All rights reserved For a full list of publications please contact: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) 80-86 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8NH Tel: +44 (0)20 3463 7399 Fax: +44 (0)20 3514 9055 pubs.iied.org Citation: George C. Kajembe, Dos Santos A.Silayo, Adam B.S. Mwakalobo, Khamaldin Mutabazi (2013) The Kilosa District REDD+ pilot project, Tanzania. A socioeconomic baseline study IIED, London. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the Norwegian Government through NORAD, as part of a multi-country project coordinated by IIED in partnership with UMB on Poverty and Sustainable Development Impacts of REDD Architecture. The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the institutions involved in this project or of NORAD. Design by: Eileen Higgins, email: [email protected] Cover photo: Duncan Macqueen Poverty and sustainable development impacts of REDD architecture; options for equity growth and the environment About this project... Poverty and sustainable development impacts of REDD architecture is a multi-country project led by the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED, UK) and the University of Life Sciences (Aas, Norway).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Outcomes Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests
    Conservation Outcomes Machakos SOMALIA Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests The CEPF Niche for Investment 40°E The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) ensures that conservation action focuses on the Although the workshops did not prioritize the sites 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 ecosystem profile and five- year investment species at the greatest risk of extinction and the sites for investment, five sites were selected for greater Lunghi Forest strategy for the Eastern Arc Mountains and and landscapes that are most important for their focus under two of the five strategic directions for Lunghi Forest kilometers Boni Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya was protection. These targets are defined at three levels, CEPF investment. This has been done to avoid scale: 1/1,000,000 Forest projection: Lamberts Equal Area Azmuthial developed based on stakeholder workshops species, sites and landscapes, representing discrete diluting the impacts of crucial investments by 38° east longitude 7° south latitude and analyses by a consortium of locally based units along an ecological continuum, using a data- spreading them across too large an area. Dodori Forest conservation organizations coordinated by the driven process and standardized criteria. Species Biodiversity hotspots are regions International Centre of Insect Physiology and outcomes aim to avoid extinctions, and the primary The five sites receiving more focused attention hotspot boundary that harbor especially high numbers Ecology and Conservation International. set of targets for species outcomes are those species through Strategic Directions 1 and 2 are: Lower of endemic species and, at the that are globally threatened (Critically Endangered, Tana River Forests, Taita Hills, East Usambaras/ Lower Tana 2°S 2°S s same time, have been significantly More than 48 local, national and international Endangered and Vulnerable) according to the IUCN Tanga, Udzungwas, and Jozani Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Environmental Flow of the Wami River Sub-Basin
    How much water do we need for nature, livelihoods and people? Assessing the environmental flow of the Wami River Sub-Basin August 2008 Prepared by the Wami - Ruvu Basin Water Office Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island Florida International University with support from the Water and Development Alliance (WADA) The Tanzania Coastal Management Partnership for Sustainable Communities and Ecosystems The Water and Development Alliance (WADA) is a collaboration between the Coca-Cola System (including corporate, foundations, and bottling partners) and USAID to improve water resource management and expand access to improved drinking water and sanitation services for poor and marginalized people in developing countries. This publication is available electronically on the Coastal Resources Center’s website at http://www. crc.uri.edu. For more information contact: Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett Bay Campus, South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA. Tel: (401) 874-6224; Fax: (401) 874-6920. Citation: Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island and Florida International University. 2008. “How much water do we need for nature, livelihoods and people? Assessing the environmental flow of the Wami River and its sub-basin,” 34 pp. Disclaimer: This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Coca-Cola Africa Foundation, and the Coca-Cola Atlanta Foundation. The contents are the responsibility of the Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island as part of the Coca- Cola System (including corporate, foundations and bottling partners) and USAID Water and Development Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • S Tanzania Is Also Extremely Important for the Diversity and Griseldis—Are Migrants from the Palearctic
    Important Bird Areas in Africa and associated islands – Tanzania ■ TANZANIA NEIL E. BAKER AND LIZ M. BAKER Mountain Buzzard Buteo oreophilus. (ILLUSTRATION: MARK ANDREWS) GENERAL INTRODUCTION grassland, swamp and marsh, steppe-grassland, montane grassland, Afromontane moorland and agricultural areas. Throughout much The United Republic of Tanzania (area 936,760 km²) lies between of the west and south-east of the country there are extensive areas the latitudes of 01°00’S and 11°36’S and between the longitudes of of dry woodland dominated by Brachystegia and Julbernardia spp., 29°21’E and 40°29’E. It comprises mainland Tanganyika together usually referred to as miombo woodland. The dry central plateau with the islands of Unguja (also known as Zanzibar), Pemba, Mafia is dominated by Acacia and Commiphora woodlands which extend and a number of smaller ones. It is bordered by Kenya and Uganda southwards to the Usangu plains and the Rukwa valley, effectively to the north, by Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratic Republic the southern limit of the Somali–Masai biome. of Congo to the west, by Zambia and Malawi to the south-west, by The population of Tanzania was estimated at 31,507,000 in 1997, Mozambique to the south and, to the east, by the reef-fringed shores with a growth-rate of 2.9%. The population belongs to more than of the Indian Ocean. 120 ethnic communities many of whom have their own languages, The terrain ranges from sea-level to 5,895 m on Mount but Kiswahili and English are the official languages of Government.
    [Show full text]