Wounded Knee 1973: Forty Years Later

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wounded Knee 1973: Forty Years Later THE CENTER FOR WESTERN STUDIES PRESENTS THE FORTY-FOURTH ANNUAL A National Conference on the Northern Plains History | Literature | Art | Archeology Wounded Knee 1973: Forty Years Later AUGUSTANA COLLEGE | APRIL 27 -28, 2 012 On display in conjunction with the Dakota Conference is the art exhibition Interpretations of Wounded Knee 1973 and 1890 , a one-time show featuring the work of twenty -two artists. A public artists’ reception will be held on Thursday, April 26, from 4:3 0- 6:30 p.m. This program is supported in part by a Challenge Grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities Welcome, Dakota Conference Presenters and Attendees! For the Forty-fourth Annual Dakota Conference, the Center for Western Studies will observe the fortieth anniversary of the occupation of Wounded Knee, South Dakota. We will do so in the larger context of the massacre at Wounded Knee by the US Seventh Calvary on December 29, 1890. On that date, Miniconjou Lakota chief Spotted Elk (Big Foot), over 300 of his Ghost Dance followers, and 38 Hunkpapas were attacked at their encampment on the banks of Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Reservation. Of the 230 Indian women and children and 120 men at the camp, at least 153 were counted dead and 44 wounded. Army casualties were 25 dead and 39 wounded. Eighty-three years later, on February 27, 197 3, 200 Oglala Lakota and American Indian Movement (AIM) supporters seized and occupied the village of Wounded Knee for 71 days in protest of a recent murder and long-held grievances against the BIA. They demanded an end to intimidation of AIM members and “traditionals” on the reservation. They demanded that treaties signed by the U.S. government be honored, especially the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty, which acknowledged Sioux claims to the Black Hills. The village was quickly surrounded by law-enforcement officials, and a siege ensued. Before it ended on May 5, the armed conflict claimed the lives of two AIM supporters. An FBI agent and a US Marshall were wounded, and 1,200 people were arrested. Through the free and open exchange among all conference attendees, we will consider the legacy of the occupation—and the earlier massacre. Fourteen books will be represented at the autograph party on Saturday, including several books on Wounded Knee. Two new books about the Great Plains will be featured in panel sessions: Remaking the Heartland: Middle America in the 1950s , by Robert Wuthnow, and The Plains Political Tradition: Essays on South Dakota Political Culture , edited by Jon Lauck, John Miller, and Donald Simmons. Dedicated to examining contemporary issues in their historical and cultural contexts, the Dakota Conference is a signature event of the Center for Western Studies, which provides programming in Northern Plains Studies at Augustana College. In awarding a Challenge Grant in support of the Centerʼs endowment, the National Endowment for the Humanities cited the Dakota Conference specifically for its hallmark blending of academic and non-academic presenters. If you value this approach to learning about the past, there is still time to help CWS meet its NEH endowment match. Thank you to each presenter and session chair and to the staff of Mikkelsen Library for their assistance in so many ways. Harry F. Thompson, Ph.D. , Executive Director Tim Hoheisel , Director of Outreach and Promotion Elizabeth Thrond , Collections Assistant Kristi Thomas , Secretary Financial Contributors Loren and Mavis Amundson CWS Endowment/SFACF Deadwood Historic Preservation Commission Tony & Anne Haga Carol Rae Hansen, Andrew Gilmour & Grace Hansen-Gilmour Carol M. Mashek Elaine Nelson McIntosh Mellon Fund Committee of Augustana College Rex Myers & Susan Richards V.R. & Joyce Nelson Rollyn H. Samp, in Honor of Ardyce Samp Roger & Shirley Schuller, in Honor of Matthew Schuller Jerry & Gail Simmons South Dakota Humanities Council Robert & Sharon Steensma Blair & Linda Tremere Richard & Michelle Van Demark Jamie & Penny Volin The Forty-Fourth Annual Dakota Conference Wounded Knee 1973: Forty Years Later The Center for Western Studies, Augustana College Sioux Falls, South Dakota, April 27-28, 2012 REGISTRATION FORM Please return this completed form with payment to: The Center for Western Studies, Augustana College, 2001 S. Summit Ave., Sioux Falls, SD 57197 For further information, call 605-274-4007 or e-mail [email protected]. For lodging, visit www.augie.edu/lodging. No. Registration: Required of all attendees Presenter fee _____ x $45.00 = $ _____ Save $5 by registering by April 16 _____ x $50.00 = $ _____ Registration after April 16 _____ x $55.00 = $ _____ One-day registration (not available to presenters) _____ x $25.00 = $ _____ Single-session registration (not available to presenters) _____ x $10.00 = $ _____ Full-time undergraduate student registration (student ID required) _____ x FREE n o i t a Current Augustana faculty r o f r (courtesy of Mellon Fund Committee) _____ x FREE e p t a r a Meals: All meals must be purchased in advance (prices include tax and gratuity). e T Save $4 by purchasing Full Meal Package (3 meals) _____ x $43.00 = $ _____ Friday Lunch with program _____ x $15.00 = $ _____ Friday Dinner with program _____ x $17.00 = $ _____ Saturday Luncheon with program _____ x $15.00 = $ _____ Saturday Trail Breakfast _____ x FREE Supporting Gifts CWS Endowment Campaign (NEH Challenge Grant will match by 25%) $_________ CWS Membership ($50 basic membership) $ _________ TOTAL $ ________ I Check enclosed (made payable to CWS) I I I I Mastercard Visa Discover American Express Credit Card # __________________________________________________________ Exp. Date _______________ Security Code (on back) _________ Signature ______________________________________________________________ Name _________________________________________________________________ Address _______________________________________________________________ City __________________________________ State __________ Zip ______________ Phone _________________________ E-mail _________________________________ Award for Distinguished Contribution to the Preservation of the Cultural Heritage of South Dakota and the Northern Plains Lillian Johnsson A true “daughter of the prairie ,” Lillian Johnsson was born and raised in Worthington, Minnesota, and has been for many years a resident of Chamberlain, South Dakota, with her husband, Gil Johnsson. She has long been active in the General Federation of Womenʼs Clubs (GFWC), serving as President of the South Dakota State Chapter and as a member of the National Board of Directors Finance Committee. She represented South Dakota on the Presidentʼs White House Commission on Women in American History. In 2008 she was awarded the GFWC of South Dakota Jennie Award for Leadership. The General Federation is the largest volunteer association of women in the U.S. and abroad. Lillian has volunteered with the South Dakota Reading Council; the GFWCʼs Kids Voting Project and Travelers Club; helped to promote meal sites in the local community and on Lower Brule and Crow Creek reservations; and serves as a docent at the Akta Lakota Museum. A craft artisan known as the “Teddy Bear Lady” for her contributions under the national program Good Bears of the World, Lillian has been active in community theater, participated in mission camp activities for the Lakota and other tribes, and with Gil has led tours to Europe and the Middle East. She served as the authorʼs special assistant for Kristin Hogansonʼs publication Consumersʼ Imperium: The Global Production of American Domesticity, 1865-1920 (University of North Carolina Press). She has presented numerous programs locally and throughout the state, in schools, retirement centers, and nursing homes. Lillian has given several papers at the Dakota Conference and received the Arthur I. and Willmeta Johnson Award for her 2010 paper “She Chose Her Own Path: Nellie Z. Willhite, South Dakotaʼs First Woman Pilot.” She and her husband, Gil, received the 2008 South Dakota Library Association Friends of the Library Award. Northern Plains Autograph Party | Saturday, April 28, 2 012 (At the CWS Fantle Building from 12:1 5-1:0 0 p.m.) *Please see Session 23 for the list of authors attending the event and their recent books. 45th Annual Dakota Conference | April 2 6-27, 2013 “The Spanish Northern Plains” The Center for Western Studies, Augustana College, Sioux Falls, SD Friday, April 27 Registration (CWS Fantle Building) 8:15 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Indian History & Culture I People & Places The West Archives & Memory Chair: John McIntyre Chair: Tony Haga Chair: Gary Earl Chair: Aaron Woodard 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. A History of the Indian Wars: Peter Norbeck: Brought Artesian Central Meade County Tenacity World War II Letters from Native 1891-1973: Violence, Indian Water to the Prairie and Common Bob Benson, Sioux Falls, SD Servicemen Resistance, and Historical Memory Sense to Washington D.C. Rebekah Walker, Augustana College Jameson Sweet, University of Jean Rahja, Aberdeen, SD (student) Minnesota 9:35 - 10:05 a.m. The U.S. Governmental Response Breakneck: “Famous” Hill in Sioux Homesteading in Dakota Territory Letters from Mary Collins and to the 1862 Dakota Conflict County, Iowa Alvin Kangas, Lake Norden, SD Frank Waters Robyn Swets, Sioux Falls, SD Gordon Iseminger, University of Sebastian Forbush, Augustana North Dakota College (student) 10:10 - 10:40 a.m. Prelude to Wounded Knee 1890 Aeneas MacKay in the White River Celebrating 150 Years of the Augustana in the 1940s David Kvernes, Carbondale, IL Badlands, August,1849 Homestead Act Alden Hovda, Joyce Olson, Eunice Elwin Rogers, Moorhead, MN Marian Cramer, Bryant, SD Mansfield, Marjorie Hanson Meester, and Arlen Viste, Sioux Falls, SD 10:45 - 11:15 a.m. Indian Archive Project: Writing Local History: The I Paid All My Debts (A North Letters of Love Genealogical and Historical Factual, the Fictive, and the Dakota Saga) Sandy Jerstad, Sioux Falls, SD Resources at the South Dakota Missing in Six: A Football Coachʼs Lloyd Svendsbye, Eden Prairie, MN State Archives Journey to a National Record , by Virginia Hanson, Pierre, SD Marc Rasmussen Wayne Kvam, Kent, OH 11:30 a.m.
Recommended publications
  • The American Indian Movement, the Trail of Broken Treaties, and the Politics of Media
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History History, Department of 7-2009 Framing Red Power: The American Indian Movement, the Trail of Broken Treaties, and the Politics of Media Jason A. Heppler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss Part of the History Commons Heppler, Jason A., "Framing Red Power: The American Indian Movement, the Trail of Broken Treaties, and the Politics of Media" (2009). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History. 21. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss/21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FRAMING RED POWER: THE AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT, THE TRAIL OF BROKEN TREATIES, AND THE POLITICS OF MEDIA By Jason A. Heppler A Thesis Presented to the Faculty The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: History Under the Supervision of Professor John R. Wunder Lincoln, Nebraska July 2009 2 FRAMING RED POWER: THE AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT, THE TRAIL OF BROKEN TREATIES, AND THE POLITICS OF MEDIA Jason A. Heppler, M.A. University of Nebraska, 2009 Adviser: John R. Wunder This study explores the relationship between the American Indian Movement (AIM), national newspaper and television media, and the Trail of Broken Treaties caravan in November 1972 and the way media framed, or interpreted, AIM's motivations and objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Was a Treaty Signed at Wounded Knee
    Was A Treaty Signed At Wounded Knee When Anselm brutified his clonk deprave not electrically enough, is Patel trapezohedral? BawdierBignoniaceous Carlton and saunter guardant very Ximeneznourishingly often while dints Brewster some mourning remains snappilyextensional or follow-through and short-lived. disquietly. At the white house decision in prison otherwise used, a treaty wounded knee was at pine ridge to make your investment into an overwhelming and imagine that. AIM members, the Lakota culture was further decimated. Behind locked in wounded knee was an investigation of signing it signed a sign in. Black coyote was. The treaty was at pine ridge known as when dunn and has been signed out of congress commissioned a sign a wound cannot be in greater numbers. Indians crowded the spectator section but no Indians from the protest were invited to tell why they did it. Make sense of his day. Pat Bellanger, via archive. One but was. Colonel forsyth in charge on to sign that decision to protect his understanding of what it. Fall for these romance novels and romance books. Native American activists during the Wounded Knee Occupation. The treaty was at casinos on ethos can reflect our own injuries or contributed to sign treaties signed treaties. Regiment killed at wounded knee was passed to sign treaties signed up. Senie and Sally Webster. Black Elk invented the Ghost Shirt. Thus on treaties signed between robinson and treaty with a sign up to freely on different perspectives of signing up arms to live and other american indians? When the cordon was briefly lifted, food addiction, of sorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Remapping the World: Vine Deloria, Jr. and the Ends of Settler Sovereignty
    Remapping the World: Vine Deloria, Jr. and the Ends of Settler Sovereignty A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY David Myer Temin IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Joan Tronto October 2016 © David Temin 2016 i Acknowledgements Perhaps the strangest part of acknowledging others for their part in your dissertation is the knowledge that no thanks could possibly be enough. At Minnesota, I count myself lucky to have worked with professors and fellow graduate students alike who encouraged me to explore ideas, take intellectual risks, and keep an eye on the political stakes of any project I might pursue. That is why I could do a project like this one and still feel emboldened that I had something important and worthwhile to say. To begin, my advisor, Joan Tronto, deserves special thanks. Joan was supportive and generous at every turn, always assuring me that the project was coming together even when I barely could see ahead through the thicket to a clearing. Joan went above and beyond in reading countless drafts, always cheerfully commenting or commiserating and getting me to focus on power and responsibility in whatever debate I had found myself wading into. Joan is a model of intellectual charity and rigor, and I will be attempting to emulate her uncanny ability to cut through the morass of complicated debates for the rest of my academic life. Other committee members also provided crucial support: Nancy Luxon, too, read an endless supply of drafts and memos. She has taught me more about writing and crafting arguments than anyone in my academic career, which has benefited the shape of the dissertation in so many ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Indigenous Alliances: International Ngos of the United States and Canada in the 1970S
    The Japanese Journal of American Studies, No. 23 (2012) Searching for Indigenous Alliances: International NGOs of the United States and Canada in the 1970s Ayako UCHIDA* INTRODUCTION On September 13, 2007, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This declaration specifies that indigenous peoples have rights to self-determination, tra- ditional lands and territories, natural resources and sacred sites, and tra- ditional languages and customs. While it is a nonbinding human rights instrument, countries are expected to follow these rules in their relations with indigenous individuals and peoples. Although the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand voted against the passage of this declaration, they changed from opposition to support within a few years. President Barack Obama announced U.S. support for the declaration on December 16, 2010.1 The UN declaration marks the culmination of efforts by indigenous peoples and their supporters during the three decades previous to pas- sage. In the 1960s and 1970s Native Americans and Native Canadians sought recognition of self-determination and cultural identity from mainstream society and their governments. The resurgence of their activism was related to the development of the human rights regime and *Associate Professor, Nagoya University 209 210 AYAKO UCHIDA postcolonial movements in the Third World after World War II. During the 1970s these movements were internationalized, and consequently in 1982 the Working Group on Indigenous Populations (WGIP) was estab- lished within the UN Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimi- nation and Protection of Minorities. Since then indigenous peoples in the world have participated in an extensive discussion of their rights to im- prove how they are treated under international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Date ___Red Power Prevails Student Worksheet
    Name ______________________________ Date __________ Red Power Prevails Student Worksheet Warm Up (THINK) Take (1) min to reflect on the information you’ve learned in school about Native American history. Jot Down some words or phrases that come to mind. (PAIR) 1.Discuss your prior knowledge with a partner. Put a check by any information, above, that your partner also wrote down. 2.With the same partner reflect on any movements for Native American rights that either of you may have learned about or heard of. Jot Down your notes below. (3mins) (SHARE) Review your notes above and circle the one you both think is most important or interesting. One of you will share this with the whole group. Activity #1 - See Think Wonder Examine the images carefully, making educated observations. Complete the see, think, wonder sentence stems. Then use the background information to explore the history and purpose of the American Indian Movement. IMAGE 1 I see (only describe what you see) ● ● I see _____________ , which makes me think … So now I wonder….. IMAGE 2 I see (only describe what you see) ● ● I see _____________ , which makes me think … So now I wonder….. Founded in July 1968 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the American Indian Movement (AIM) is an American Indian advocacy group organized to address issues related to sovereignty, leadership, and treaties. During the 1950s, increasing numbers of American Indians had been forced to move away from reservations and tribal culture because of federal Indian termination policies intended to assimilate them into mainstream American culture. Founders of AIM included Mary Jane Wilson, Dennis Banks, Vernon Bellecourt, Clyde Bellecourt, and George Mitchell, while other activists like Russell Means worked with the organization prominently in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Women and Coerced Sterilization: on the Trail of Tears in the 1970S
    AMERICAN IMIAN CULTURE AND RESEARCHJOURNAL24:2 (2000) 1-22 Native American Women and Coerced Sterilization: On the Trail of Tears in the 1970s SALLY J. TORPY During the 1970s, the majority of American protest efforts focused on the feminist, civil rights, and anti-government movements. On a smaller scale, Native Americans initiated their own campaign. Network television periodi- cally broadcast scenes of confrontation ranging from the Alcatraz Occupation in 1969 through the Wounded Knee Occupation of 1973. The consistent objective was to regain treaty rights that had been violated by the United States government and private corporations. Little publicity was given to another form of Native American civil rights vio- lations-the abuse of women’s reproductive freedom. Thousands of poor women and women of color, including Puerto Ricans, Blacks, and Chicanos, were sterilized in the 1970s, often without full knowledge of the surgical proce- dure performed on them or its physical and psychological ramifications. Native American women represented a unique class of victims among the larger popu- lation that faced sterilization and abuses of reproductive rights. These women were especially accessible victims due to several unique cultural and societal real- ities setting them apart from other minorities. Tribal dependence on the federal government through the Indian Health Service (IHS), the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW), and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) robbed them of their children andjeopardized their future as sovereign nations. Native women’s struggle to obtain control over reproductive rights has provided them with a sense of empowerment consistent with larger Native American efforts to be free of institutional control.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (19Kb)
    Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. CENGAGE LEARNING AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale General OneFile Terms and Conditions and by using the machine generated PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of the machine generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom. Red power: why did America's natives go back on the warpath in the 1960s? Author: Tony McCulloch Date: Jan. 2009 From: 20th Century History Review(Vol. 4, Issue 2) Publisher: Philip Allan Updates Document Type: Report Length: 3,419 words Full Text: America in the 1960s and 1970s witnessed several ethnic protest movements linked to the demand for civil rights. Martin Luther King and the black Civil Rights movement arc the best-known examples of this ethnic activism. Another example is the Chicano Civil Rights movement associated with Cesar Chavez and Mexican American activism (see 20TH CENTURY HISTORY REVIEW, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Indian Movement's Strategic Choices
    The American Indian Movement’s Strategic Choices: Environmental Limitations and Organizational Outcomes Timothy Baylor Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania The roots of modern Indian protest reach backward in history and forward into the future. Modern protest developed out of specific historical contingencies. For many protesters, the immediate concerns of housing shortages, police brutality, poverty, unemployment, and similar issues existed along side other issues such as identity and status within the American mosaic. Did Indians represent just another ethnic group bound to be assimilated by American society, or did Indians embody something different and far more significant – nations? As modern Indian protest escalated, the question increased in salience. Nancy Lurie explained that “Indian distinctiveness ... stressed culturally and historically” included an “emphasis on treaties rather than judicial recourse in obtaining perceived rights of Indians,” “an attitude that all other Americans are ‘immigrants,’” and that Indians as the “‘First Americans’ deserve special consideration (1972:308). In this sense, Native Americans were different than Blacks and other ethnic minority groups; they were the only ethnic group the U.S. Supreme Court had defined as “domestic dependent nations” in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831). Just what this meant and the degree of tribal sovereignty this status conveys has continued to be a matter of political and judicial wrangling. Regardless of the Indians’ status as “domestic dependent nations,” the overall American policy was one of assimilation in which reservations were seen as a temporary necessity until Indians had gained the necessary cultural, educational, and technical levels of competence necessary to participate in American life. Central to accomplishing this end was the boarding school system.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Enactment and the Occupation of Wounded Knee
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 5-1-2002 MENDING THE SACRED HOOP: IDENTITY ENACTMENT AND THE OCCUPATION OF WOUNDED KNEE Sheryl L. Lindsley California State University, Stanislaus Charles Braithwaite California State University, Stanislaus, [email protected] Kristin L. Ahlberg University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Lindsley, Sheryl L.; Braithwaite, Charles; and Ahlberg, Kristin L., "MENDING THE SACRED HOOP: IDENTITY ENACTMENT AND THE OCCUPATION OF WOUNDED KNEE" (2002). Great Plains Quarterly. 39. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/39 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Great Plains Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 2 (Spring 2002). Published by the Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Copyright © 2000 Center for Great Plains Studies. Used by permission. MENDING THE SACRED HOOP IDENTITY ENACTMENT AND THE OCCUPATION OF WOUNDED KNEE SHERYL L. LINDSLEY, CHARLES A. BRAITHWAITE, and KRISTIN L. AHLBERG I can still see the butchered women and children lying heaped and scattered all along the crooked gulch as plain as when I saw them with eyes still young. And I can see something else died there in the bloody mud, and was buried in the blizzard.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirals of Transformation: Turtle Island Indigenous Social Movements and Literatures Laura M De Vos a Dissertation Submitted In
    Spirals of Transformation: Turtle Island Indigenous Social Movements and Literatures Laura M De Vos A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: Dian Million, Chair Habiba Ibrahim, Chair Eva Cherniavsky José Antonio Lucero Program authorized to offer Degree: English ©Copyright 2020 Laura M De Vos University of Washington Abstract Spirals of Transformation: Turtle Island Indigenous Social Movements and Literatures Laura M De Vos Chairs of the Supervisory Committee: Dian Million Department of American Indian Studies Habiba Ibrahim Department of English Spirals of Transformation analyzes the embodied knowledges visible in Indigenous social movements and literatures. It demonstrates how a heuristic of spiralic temporality helps us see relationships and purposes the settler temporal structure aims to make not just invisible, but unthinkable. “Spiralic temporality” refers to an Indigenous experience of time that is informed by a people’s particular relationships to the seasonal cycles on their lands, and which acknowledges the present generations’ responsibilities to the ancestors and those not yet born. The four chapters discuss the Pacific Northwest Fish Wars, several generations of Native women activism, Idle No More, and the No Dakota Access Pipeline movement respectively. Through a discussion of literatures from the same place, the heuristic helps make visible how the place- based values, which the movements I discuss are fighting for, are both as old as time and adapted to the current moment. In this way, spiralic temporality offers a different conceptualization than what the hegemonic settler temporality is capable of. Spirals of Transformation: Turtle Island Indigenous Social Movements and Literatures Laura De Vos Spirals of Transformation: “Our bodies contain all of these rings and motions” ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of Leonard Peltier the Trial of Leonard Peltier
    THE TRIAL OF LEONARD PELTIER THE TRIAL OF LEONARD PELTIER by Jim Messerschmidr Foreword by William Kunstler sourh end press TO HELP LEONARD PELTIER FIGHT FOR JUSTICE Send inquiries about how you can help and donations to: Leonard Peltier Defense Committee P.O. Box 583 Lawrence, KS 66044 Send letters of support directly to Leonard: Leonard Peltier#89637-132 United States Penitentiary P.O. Box 1000 Leavenworth. KS 66048-3333 Copyright© 1983 by Jim Messerschmidt Any properly footnoted quotation of up to 500 sequential words may be used without permission, as long as the total number of words quoted does not exceed 2,000. For longer quotations or for a greater number of total words, please write for permission to South End Press. Cover design by Todd Jailer Cover graphic by Robert Warrior Typeset by Trade Composition and South End Press Produced by the South End Press collective Printed in the U.S.A. on acid-free, recycled paper. Library of Congress Number: 82-061152 ISBN: 0-89608-163-x (paper) ISBN: 0-89608-164-8 (cloth) www.southendpress.org South End Press, 7 Brookline Street, #1, Cambridge, MA02139-4146 06 05 04 03 02 7 8 9 10 11 THIS BOOK IS WRITTEN FOR LEONARD WHO REMAINS A POLITICAL PRISONER ON HIS OWN LAND. I DEDICATE THE BOOK TO ERIK AND THE FUTURE OF HIS GENERATION. Leonard Peltier Courtesy of the Leonard Peltier Defense Committee FOREWORD William Kunstler* Having tried the case of one of Leonard Peltier's co-defendants, twice arguedMr. Peltier'sappealsfrom his convictionsof the murders of two FBI agents on the Pine Ridge (SD) Indian Reservation, and presently handling hismotion for anewtrial, Ican hardly beranked as adisinterested witness.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching the Rhetorical Sovereignty of Gerald Vizenor Through Bearheart Lydia R
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: English, Department of Department of English 4-2016 Dreaming Free From the Chains: Teaching the Rhetorical Sovereignty of Gerald Vizenor Through Bearheart Lydia R. Presley University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss Part of the Ethnic Studies Commons, and the Literature in English, North America, Ethnic and Cultural Minority Commons Presley, Lydia R., "Dreaming Free From the Chains: Teaching the Rhetorical Sovereignty of Gerald Vizenor Through Bearheart " (2016). Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English. 113. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss/113 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. DREAMING FREE FROM THE CHAINS: TEACHING THE RHETORICAL SOVEREIGNTY OF GERALD VIZENOR THROUGH BEARHEART by Lydia R. Presley A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: English Under the Supervision of Professor Thomas Gannon Lincoln, Nebraska April, 2016 DREAMING FREE FROM THE CHAINS: TEACHING THE RHETORICAL SOVEREIGNTY OF GERALD VIZENOR THROUGH BEARHEART Lydia R. Presley, M.A. University of Nebraska, 2016 Advisor: Thomas Gannon The purpose of this thesis is to examine Gerald Vizenor’s novel Bearheart, through the lens of rhetorical sovereignty. What this means is that the crux of my understanding of Bearheart begins with the knowledge that the language, terminology, and style used by Vizenor are not only his choices, but also his inherent Native right to use.
    [Show full text]