DOCSLIB.ORG

Network RUS Electrification Strategy Draft for Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Network RUS Electrification Strategy Draft for Consultation Network RUS: Electrification Strategy Draft for Consultation May 2009 1 Foreword In England and Wales, two options in particular – the Great Western and Midland Main Lines – are shown to have high benefit to cost ratios. I am pleased to present this draft Electrification These options, along with a key strategic infill Strategy, which forms part of the Network Route scheme, are both presented in the proposed Utilisation Strategy (RUS). The Network RUS strategy. In the case of the Great Western Main looks at issues affecting the whole network Line, the work required to the existing network at rather than in specific geographical areas. the western end of the Crossrail route could, in effect, be the first stage of electrifying the line. Approximately 40 per cent of the network in terms of track miles is currently electrified, In Scotland, the main focus is on electrification though several main lines, much of the cross of priority schemes in the Central Belt, allowing country network, as well as key freight links and electric traction between Edinburgh and diversionary routes remain un-electrified. This Glasgow via Falkirk, and an extension to document therefore sets out a potential longer- Dunblane and Alloa. term strategic approach to further electrification of the network. As with each RUS, this has been developed with the full input of the rest of the rail industry Electrification presents a huge opportunity for including train and freight operators, as well as the industry, for those who use the railway and government and passenger representatives. I for the country as a whole. Our analysis shows thank everyone for their contribution to date. the long-term benefits of electrifying key parts of This is a draft for consultation so we are now the network in terms of both reducing its seeking feedback and comments to support and ongoing cost to the country and improving its inform our further analysis. Comments are environmental performance are significant. invited before a deadline of 14 July and we are working towards publication of the final strategy Governments in London, Edinburgh and Cardiff later this year. are looking to reduce both the operational cost of the railway and overall carbon emissions, as well as encouraging modal shift. Our analysis identifies the benefits a strategic approach to Iain Coucher electrification would bring in each of these areas. In the current economic climate, any investment will inevitably raise significant questions about affordability even where there are clear longer term cost savings. The industry will therefore need to work with government and other funders on this issue. Electrification also has a potentially significant role to play in reducing carbon emissions from rail transport as well as improving air quality and reducing noise. Electric trains, on average, emit 20 to 30 per cent less carbon than diesel trains, and their superior performance in terms of braking and accelerating can help reduce journey times. In addition, they provide more seats for passengers, making a greater contribution to increasing the overall capacity of the railway. Passengers and freight operators would also both benefit from an improved service in other ways, such as through the creation of more diversionary routes. Network RUS: Electrification Draft for Consultation 2 Executive Summary Scotland, the Welsh Assembly Government, Transport for London, the Passenger Transport Executive (PTE) Group, the Association of Train At present approximately 40% of the British rail Operating Companies (ATOC), freight operating network (measured in track miles) is electrified. companies, Passenger Focus, London These lines carry a little under half of the TravelWatch, the RoSCos and the Rail Freight passenger train miles operated and around 5% Group. The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) of the freight train mileage. Several main lines, attended Stakeholder Management Group much of the cross country network, many key meetings as observers. The Electrification freight links and diversionary routes remain un- Strategy was developed by a working group electrified. Consequently, a large number of consisting of Network Rail, the Department for passenger and freight services are operated by Transport, Transport Scotland, the Welsh diesel hauled trains. In many cases diesel trains Assembly Government, ATOC, DB Schenker, operate on the electrified network (a practice Transport for London, the PTE Group, the Rail known as ‘running under the wires’) because Industry Association, RoSCos and the Rail their diverse range of origins and destinations Freight Group, again with the ORR as involve running on unelectrified sections. observers. As a consequence, a significant proportion of Despite the unique role of the Network RUS in passengers and the majority of freight are the RUS programme, the process followed is carried by diesel operation which is more costly consistent with that adopted throughout the and produces more pollution than its electric RUS programme. It has involved an equivalent. understanding of the current electrified network, consideration of the ‘gaps’ in current In the last two years, both the Department for electrification, the drivers of change and the Transport and Transport Scotland have development of business cases for further published their long term visions for the rail electrification. network. Both governments wish to increase usage of the network, whist lowering its The potential for reduction in whole industry operating costs and minimising its costs is one of the key drivers of change. environmental impact. The Welsh Assembly Compared to a diesel operation, an electric Government is committed to the same service will have lower rolling stock operating objectives under the Wales Transport Strategy. costs (fuel savings currently estimated as This Route Utilisation Strategy considers between 19 and 26 pence lower per vehicle mile whether the expansion of the proportion of the and maintenance costs at approximately 20 UK railway operated under electric traction pence less per vehicle mile for passenger should be increased to help realise the visions. vehicles), have higher levels of vehicle reliability and availability and lower leasing costs. The Other than the Freight RUS, which was superior performance of electric vehicles can established in May 2007, the Network RUS is provide journey time savings. Whilst these may the only RUS which covers the entire network. be modest for high speed long distance Its network wide perspective – supported by a services, they can be more significant in urban stakeholder group with network wide expertise – areas where frequent stops make acceleration enables the development of a consistent savings more significant and, if the savings are approach to issues which underpin the significant on a particular route, diagrams could development of the network. It enables be saved. For freight services the use of loops strategies to be developed by the rail industry, may be avoided. Electric trains have more seats its funders, users and suppliers which are than diesel loco hauled trains, making a greater underpinned by a network wide perspective to contribution to accommodating anticipated planning. The outputs of the RUS will used in growth in demand. subsequent industry planning, including the geographical RUSs, thereby ensuring that the Electrification also has a significant role to play key issues are dealt with consistently throughout in reducing carbon emissions. Electric vehicles, the RUS programme. on average, emit 20% to 30% less CO2 emissions than their diesel counterparts. In The Network RUS is overseen by a Stakeholder addition, they tend to be quieter in operation. Management Group consisting of Network Rail, The Department for Transport, Transport Network RUS: Electrification Draft for Consultation 3 The service reliability, journey time and electrification from Edinburgh to Glasgow via environmental benefits of electrification result in Falkirk and be extended to Dunblane and Alloa, an improved product for the passenger. and to allow Glasgow to Falkirk and Motherwell Similarly, there is potential for freight operators to Cumbernauld services to run under electric to provide a superior product, potentially with traction. lower operating costs. The ability of freight operators to do this potentially increases as It is recommended that the improved knowledge more of the network is electrified. It is envisaged of implementation techniques and the emerging that infill electrification would enable cost costs of the Core Strategy be used to inform a savings to be achieved on some routes for decision on whether there would be a case for operators with existing electric locos. Further the implementation of further schemes. electrification potentially increases the Geographical RUSs will provide detailed availability of diversionary routes for electric understanding of demand, service structures vehicles, reducing the need for bus substitution and rolling stock deployment. Taken together, for passenger services, improving the freight the updated knowledge of costs and demand product and easing the provision of access for will enable business cases to be updated to maintenance work. Any further electrification of inform an updated Network RUS Electrification the network would involve highly reliable and Strategy which would identify the strongest easily maintainable equipment. It would be candidates to take forward. It is also delivered efficiently at low benchmarked
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rf LTW Chiltern Response
    campaigning by the Railway Development Society Limited Development of Train Services for Chiltern Routes Response from Railfuture 1. Introduction Railfuture is pleased to respond to the London TravelWatch document regarding the Development of Train Services for Chiltern Routes. Our comments will be brief and to the point. Railfuture is the campaigning name of the Railway Development Society Limited, a (not for profit) Limited Company organised in England as twelve regional branches plus two national branches in Scotland and Wales. This coordinated response has been compiled by Railfuture London & South East, and has been agreed with Railfuture Thames Valley for those sections of line in their area (Amersham to Aylesbury and West Ruislip to Bicester North). 2. General Comments Railfuture welcomes the initiative from LTW to suggest ways of raising standards of service on Chiltern Railways services in London and South East. We note the work that has gone into gathering the detail on network capacity and existing services. Chiltern is unique for a number of reasons: its close working relationship and shared infrastructure with London Underground (LU) on the Aylesbury Line; the close proximity of other LU and London Bus services to many Chiltern ‘metro’ stations on the High Wycombe line; the close mix of short and medium distance commuter traffic and the poor interchange facilities at Marylebone. It is equally unique for the impressive increase in patronage generated by reliable modern rolling stock and infrastructure; the benefits of a long-term franchise agreement and an imaginative customer oriented professional management team. It is also inhibited by many of the factors that make it unique! These range from the poor interchange facilities at Marylebone, to a lack of infrastructure between Wembley and West Ruislip.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Capacity Statement
    Framework Capacity Statement Network Rail December 2016 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 1 Contents 1. Purpose 1.1 Purpose 4 2. National overview 2.1 Infrastructure covered by this statement 6 2.2 Framework agreements in Great Britain 7 2.3 Capacity allocation in Great Britain 9 2.4 National capacity overview – who operates where 10 2.5 National capacity overview – who operates when 16 3. Network Rail’s Routes 3.1 Anglia Route 19 3.2 London North East & East Midlands Route 20 3.3 London North Western Route 22 3.4 Scotland Route 24 3.5 South East Route 25 3.6 Wales Routes 27 3.7 Wessex Route 28 3.8 Western Route 29 4. Sub-route and cross-route data 4.1 Strategic Routes / Strategic Route Sections 31 4.2 Constant Traffic Sections 36 Annex: consultation on alternative approaches A.1 Questions of interpretation of the requirement 39 A.2 Potential solutions 40 A.3 Questions for stakeholders 40 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 2 1. Purpose Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 3 1.1 Purpose the form in which data may be presented. The contracts containing the access rights are publicly available elsewhere, and links are provided in This statement is published alongside Network Rail’s Network Statement section 2.2. However, the way in which the rights are described when in order to meet the requirements of European Commission Implementing combined on the geography of the railway network, and over time, to meet Regulation (EU) 2016/545 of 7 April 2016 on procedures and criteria the requirements of the regulation, is open to some interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabeth Line
    COMPLETING ELIZABETH LINE THE ELIZABETH LINE Trial Running Update TRIAL RUNNING Plumstead Sidings PROJECT UPDATE WHAT IS TRIAL RUNNING? Delivery of the Elizabeth line is now in its Throughout the Trial Running programme Crossrail will Trial Running marks the point at which the Railways and complex final stages. Crossrail and Transport steadily increase the numbers of trains running in the tunnels. Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 This will then be further increased and will allow the railway (ROGS) apply for the first time in the Central Operating for London (TfL) are working to ensure the and the supporting systems to be operated as close as Section. Crossrail transitions from following the construction earliest possible opening for the Elizabeth line. possible to an operational timetable. regulations to following Rail regulations. The project is nearing the next important milestone and There is important work to be done but we will take the time Following a readiness review, we will sign over control of the expects to commence extensive commissioning of the railway needed to get it right. Our top priority is a safe railway which central operating section to TfL as infrastructure manager as in spring 2021. This is a crucial moment in the project with the London and the UK can rely on. we transition to ROGS and operate under the Railway Rule railway on track to open in the first half of 2022. Book. From that moment forward, TfL’s service and The progress we have seen over recent months highlights the infrastructure managers will be accountable for the safety, The next phase, Trial Running, involves integrated trials of clear path we have towards completing the Elizabeth line and operation and maintenance of the railway, and the Trial the railway to demonstrate that the Elizabeth line is safe and commencing passenger services in the first half of 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Lodge, Sutton Park
    MIDLAND LODGE, SUTTON PARK A history of the building with details of its architecture, its association with two well-known tenants and the establishment of Sutton Coldfield’s Vesey Club in 1888. Roy Billingham Midland Lodge is a residential property situated within Sutton Park, designed by William Jenkins, a Birmingham architect, and built in 1880 for the Warden and Society of Sutton Coldfield. Following the Town’s incorporation in 1886, ownership passed to the new Corporation of Sutton Coldfield, and to Birmingham City Council in 1974 after Government reorganisation of local authority boundaries. The site of Midland Lodge (O.S. Grid Ref. SP 1121 9715) is adjacent to the Midland Gate entrance to Sutton Park at the western end of Midland Road which was constructed as a private road by the Midland Railway Company in 1879 to provide direct access for train passengers to and from the Park for their Sutton Park railway station. “New Lodge”, as the cottage was originally called, had several tenants prior to 1886 when Benjamin Stone, Sutton Coldfield’s first Mayor, took over the tenancy in order to meet the necessary residential qualifications to become a burgess of the Town. During his four years as Mayor, 1886-90, the lodge was known as “The Mayor’s Cottage” which he treated as his pied- à-terre, his own home being in Grange Lane, Erdington. After Stone terminated his tenancy in 1891 the cottage was referred to ever afterwards as “Midland Lodge”. Fig. 1(a) – Midland Lodge in c. 1910 Fig. 1(b) – Midland Lodge in February, 2014 Photograph by Benjamin Stone [Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • London to Norwich Direct Train
    London To Norwich Direct Train Kristos gurgles her incautiousness frontally, dree and patchier. Nightmarish Adnan usually calibrate some lurkers or sleet jawbreakingly. Weighted Stillman bade ministerially or bales harmonically when Wyatan is rhotic. East anglia is direct, there are implemented and can travel entry to change or parks on this car, no direct train to london norwich. How to Travel From London to Norwich by Train Bus TripSavvy. National Express runs a regular bus service between London Victoria Coach now and the Norwich Bus Station which leaves London at. Bus from London to Norwich Find schedules Compare prices Book Megabus National Express and National Express tickets. The cheapest train connections from London to Norwich. When creating an average northern advanced fare. Norwich is also elm hill and table service is definitely worth trying when it from your train to yorkshire and make significant damage to alcohol, london to norwich direct train! Click on a gift card pin. What is Norwich like about visit? Get cheap train tickets to Norwich with our split up search. The direct from london st pancras international partners sites selected are as nationalrail and direct train tickets between london liverpool street every kind of. Our London Sidcup Hotel is Located between London and Kent and just 100m from the Train them Free Wi-Fi Throughout Your content Book Direct. How it is regarded as a colourful excursion to norwich here when we cannot wait to ironically for all! Connect to new azuma trains from time limit fuel facility supplies renewable compressed natural habitats, so just under a button down.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity on North-South Main Lines
    Capacity on North-South Main Lines Technical Report Report October 2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: Department for Transport Steer Davies Gleave Click here to enter text. 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Technical Report CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... I 1 CREATING THE TIMETABLES THAT DETERMINE CAPACITY PROVISION IS A COMPLEX ISSUE .................................................................................................. 1 2 EUROPEAN COMPARISONS ........................................................................ 5 3 HOW CAPACITY CAN BE MEASURED ............................................................ 7 4 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES ..................................................................... 9 5 CAPACITY AND THE NORTH-SOUTH ROUTES ................................................ 11 West Coast Main Line .............................................................................. 11 Midland Main Line .................................................................................. 13 East Coast Main Line ............................................................................... 14 Route section categorisation: green/orange/red ............................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 5.1 Assessed post-2019 Capacity Pressures on North-South Main Lines 19 Contents Technical Report Summary 1. This note assesses the capacity of the North-South Rail Lines in the UK from the perspective
    [Show full text]
  • 1 MINISTERIAL ENGAGEMENT BRIEFING: KEITH BROWN Copied
    MINISTERIAL ENGAGEMENT BRIEFING: KEITH BROWN Copied to: Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Infrastructure, Investment and Cities Engagement Title Meeting with RAILQWEST. Timing Routine Organisation/Venue and full Scottish Parliament address including postcode Room – TG 22 Date and Time of Engagement Date: 11 March 2014 Time: 12:00 – 12:30 Background/Purpose MCS Ref (If appropriate) N/A MCS Letter reference: (If appropriate) Purpose/Invitation History: The meeting was arranged at the request of RailQwest to allow the group to put forward its case for the electrification of the City Union Line (Glasgow CrossRail) in Control Period 5. Relevance to Core Script Smarter, Wealthier and Farer Greeting Party and specific RailQwest attendees to be met at visitor meeting point on arrival (if services, where a member of the Minister’s event is at a non SE Building private office will escort them to the meeting room. Specific entrance for None Ministerial Car/parking arrangements Venue contact Number N/A Special Dress Requirements None Event Programme 1. Introductions 2. RailQwest presentation 3. General discussion 1 Summary Page (key issues, Annex A - Summary of Issues lines to take if pressed and Annex B - Biographs of attendees issues to avoid) Annex C - Map showing City Union Line Annex D - Other information Speech/Speaking Points Lines to take provided in Annex A Guest List or Meeting Ian Richard – Secretary of RailQwest Attendees Roddy McDougall – member Ken Sutherland – member William Forbes - member Supplementary Info: None Directions
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering a Rail Revolution for Communities
    Delivering a Rail Revolution for Communities Malcolm Holmes, Executive Director West Midlands Rail Executive is a movement for change, driving a revolution in rail services for West Midlanders • Increasing local influence over our rail network through: • A strong role in the specification and procurement of the 2017 West Midlands franchise • Leading the local management of the franchise • A role in specification of other franchises that operate in the region • A fully devolved West Midlands rail franchise WMRE Strategic Focus Single Network Vision West Midlands Rail Investment Strategy West Midlands West Midlands Rail Franchising Rail Programme Stations Alliance & Partnerships WMRE Strategic Focus Single Network Vision West Midlands Rail Investment Strategy West Midlands West Midlands Rail Franchising Rail Programme Stations Alliance & Partnerships Franchises in WMRE Area Crewe Stoke-on-Trent West Midlands Franchise - WMSBU West Midlands Franchise - WCSBU Derby Cross Country Nottingham Stafford Chiltern Railways Rugeley Trent Valley Wales & Borders (Arriva Trains Wales) Burton-on- Rugeley Town Trent Inter City West Coast (Virgin Trains) Cannock Lichfield Trent Lichfield City Valley Great Western (First Great Western) East Midlands Walsall Tamworth Shrewsbury Sutton Coldfield Tame Bridge Pky Wolverhampton Nuneaton Birmingham Aston Snow Hill Hinckley Leicester Telford Telford Central Smethwick Galton Bridge New St Rowley Regis Birmingham International Cradley Heath Birmingham Moor St University Coventry Rugby Stourbridge Solihull Long Buckby
    [Show full text]
  • SUGGESTED LAYOUT and SERVICES for OLD OAK
    98 Manor Way, Beckenham, Kent BR3 3LR 07843 234002 www.westlondonlinegroup.org.uk March 2014 SUGGESTED LAYOUT and SERVICES FOR OLD OAK COMMON FOR WEST LONDON LINE, NORTH LONDON LINE, GREAT WESTERN MAIN LINE, CROSSRAIL and HS2 plus WEST COAST MAIN LINE and MIDLAND MAIN LINE There is a lack of detailed and complete information in Network Rail’s London & South East Route Utilisation Strategy regarding demand on the West London Line and others in the area that would arise from an interchange with the Great Western Main Line (GWML), Crossrail and High Speed 2 (HS2) at Old Oak Common that would also be integrated with the regeneration proposals in this area. We have therefore set out below our suggested revisions to TfL’s proposed Option A for the layout for the Old Oak Common interchange. Our suggestions should accommodate anticipated increased rail demand arising generally, from growth on the WLL, WLL and other lines’ connections with Crossrail/GWML and HS2, and the need to produce a Premier Interchange that is ‘future-proofed’ until at least 2080. We believe these suggestions are workable and provide better rail capacities and integration, with lesser impacts on residents and ecological areas, and with no sprawl. Our suggested curves are no tighter than elsewhere in Option A; ideally these should be eased to minimise ‘wheel squeal’ and running times. The feasibility of our suggestions in terms of gradients and height clearances for running tracks would need to be checked. The HS2 and Crossrail/GWML platforms are unchanged, although we would urge that the HS2 platforms are elevated to reduce vertical interchange distances between them and other lines (and presumably the spoil to be removed for the HS2 station box): this elevation should also ease our suggested connections between the HS2 tracks and those of Crossrail and the WLL.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Transport
    House of Commons Transport Committee Freight Transport Eighth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 July 2008 HC 249 Published on 19 July 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £24.50 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chairman) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Mr Philip Hollobone MP (Conservative, Kettering) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Mr Eric Martlew MP (Labour, Carlisle) Mr Lee Scott MP (Conservative, Ilford North) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Mr Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Mr David Wilshire MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe and Nantwich) was also a member of the Committee during the period covered by this report. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Tom Healey (Clerk), Annette Toft (Second Clerk), David Davies (Committee Specialist), Tim Steer (Committee Specialist), Alison Mara (Committee Assistant), Ronnie Jefferson (Secretary), Gaby Henderson (Senior Office Clerk) and Laura Kibby (Media Officer).
    [Show full text]