DOCSLIB.ORG

Cdl-Ad(2017)027

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Strasbourg, Warsaw, 11 December 2017 CDL-AD(2017)027 Opinion No. 901/2017 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion-Nr.: POLIT-MDA/314/2017 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA GOVERNING THE FUNDING OF POLITICAL PARTIES AND ELECTORAL CAMPAIGNS Adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 60th meeting (Venice, 7 December 2017) and by the Venice Commission at its 113th Plenary Session (Venice, 8-9 December 2017) on the basis of comments by Mr Philip DIMITROV (Member, Bulgaria) Mr Michael FRENDO (Member, Malta) Mr Pieter VAN DIJK (Expert, Former Member, Netherlands) Mr Fernando CASAL BÉRTOA (OSCE/ODIHR Core Group of Experts on Political Parties) Mr Richard KATZ (OSCE/ODIHR Core Group of Experts on Political Parties) Ms Tatyana HILSCHER-BOGUSSEVICH (OSCE/ODIHR Expert) Ms Alice THOMAS (OSCE/ODIHR Expert) Mr Alvis VILKS (GRECO Expert, Latvia) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int www.legislationline.org CDL-AD(2017)027 - 2 - Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Scope of the Joint Opinion ......................................................................................... 3 III. Executive summary and conclusions ......................................................................... 4 IV. Analysis and Recommendations ................................................................................ 5 A. International standards relating to the financing of political parties and electoral campaigns .......................................................................................................... 5 B. National legal framework and recent reforms – background ................................ 6 C. Funding sources ................................................................................................. 8 D. Reporting requirements and supervision ........................................................... 16 E. Sanctions .......................................................................................................... 20 - 3 - CDL-AD(2017)027 I. Introduction 1. By letter of 14 September 2017, Mr Cesar Florin Preda, Chair of the Monitoring Committee of the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly, requested an Opinion of the Council of Europe’s European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) on the legal framework governing the funding of political parties and campaigns, as well as the recent amendments to the electoral legislation of the Republic of Moldova. 2. By letter of 15 September 2017, the Secretary of the Venice Commission confirmed the Venice Commission’s readiness to carry out such an assessment and proposed, as a first step, that the Venice Commission jointly with the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) prepare an Opinion on the legal framework governing the funding of political parties and electoral campaigns. The recent amendments to the electoral legislation would be assessed at a later stage. 3. The Commission invited Mr Philip Dimitrov, Mr Michael Frendo and Mr Pieter van Dijk to act as rapporteurs for this Opinion. Ms Tatyana Hilscher-Bogussevich, Ms Alice Thomas, Mr Richard Katz and Mr Fernando Casal Bértoa were appointed as experts for the OSCE/ODIHR. In addition, the Council of Europe’s Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) was invited to appoint an expert to contribute to this Opinion. The expert appointed was Mr Alvis Vilks. 4. On 17-18 October 2017, a delegation composed of Mr Philip Dimitrov and Mr Pieter van Dijk on behalf of the Venice Commission, accompanied by Mr Michael Janssen from the Secretariat, Ms Tatyana Hilscher-Bogussevich and Mr Fernando Casal Bértoa on behalf of the OSCE/ODIHR, and Mr Alvis Vilks on behalf of GRECO visited Chişinău and met with the Chairperson of the Central Electoral Commission (CEC), the Minister of Justice, the Chairperson of Parliament, representatives of the parliamentary factions and groups, as well as non-parliamentary groups, civil society and international organisations. This Joint Opinion takes into account the information obtained during the above-mentioned visit. 5. In 2013, the OSCE/ODIHR and the Venice Commission published a Joint Opinion on draft legislation of the Republic of Moldova pertaining to the financing of political parties and electoral campaigns (hereafter: 2013 Joint Opinion).1 In 2015, the Republic of Moldova implemented a reform in this area. On 19 June 2017, a Joint Opinion on draft amendments to the electoral legislation (hereafter: 2017 Joint Opinion) – which included amendments to some campaign finance provisions – was adopted.2 On 20 July 2017, the electoral reform was enacted. More details on the reform process are given below under section IV.B. 6. The present Joint Opinion was adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 60th meeting (Venice, 7 December 2017) and by the Venice Commission at its 113th plenary session (Venice, 8-9 December 2017). 7. The OSCE/ODIHR and the Venice Commission remain at the disposal of the Moldovan authorities for any further assistance that they may require. II. Scope of the Joint Opinion 8. The scope of this Joint Opinion covers the following legal provisions: Articles 24 to 313 of the Law on Political Parties (LPP); Articles 35 to 38, 382, 383, 41(22), and 69 to 71 of the 1 Joint Opinion on Draft Legislation of the Republic of Moldova pertaining to financing political parties and election campaigns CDL-AD(2013)002. 2 Joint Opinion on the draft laws on amending and completing certain legislative acts (electoral system for the election of the Parliament) CDL-AD(2017)012. CDL-AD(2017)027 - 4 - Electoral Code (EC); Articles 48 to 482 of the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO); and Article 1812 of the Criminal Code (CC). Those provisions are assessed with a particular focus on the 2015 and 2017 legal reforms and on their compliance with the relevant recommendations made in the above-mentioned previous Joint Opinions.3 9. The Joint Opinion raises key issues and provides indications of areas of concern. In the interest of conciseness, it focuses rather on areas that require amendments or improvements than on the positive aspects of the legislation in place. The ensuing recommendations are based on relevant Council of Europe and other international human rights standards and obligations, OSCE commitments and good international practices. Reference is also made to the relevant findings and recommendations from the previous Joint Opinions, OSCE/ODIHR and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) reports on elections observed4 and relevant GRECO reports.5 10. Moreover, in accordance with the commitments of the OSCE and the Council of Europe to mainstream a gender perspective into all policies, measures and activities,6 the Joint Opinion also takes account of the impact of the legislation on the equality between women and men. 11. The present Joint Opinion is based on English translations of the following legal texts, which must be read together: excerpts of the Law on Political Parties7 with amendments until 4 June 2013 and of the “Law Amending and Supplementing legislative instruments” of 9 April 2015, CDL-REF(2017)044, the “Law Amending and Completing Certain Legislative Acts” of 20 July 2017, CDL-REF(2017)045; as well as the Electoral Code as of 21 July 2016, CDL- REF(2017)020. Inaccuracies may occur in this Joint Opinion as a result of incorrect translations. 12. The OSCE/ODIHR and the Venice Commission would like to note that this Joint Opinion may not cover all aspects of the legal framework governing the funding of political parties and electoral campaigns in the Republic of Moldova, and that it does not prevent them from formulating additional written or oral recommendations or comments on this matter in the future. III. Executive Summary and Conclusions 13. The series of amendments introduced to the Law on Political Parties, the Electoral Code and other laws relevant to the financing of political parties and electoral campaigns in the Republic of Moldova during 2015-2017 brought improvements in a number of issues and some previous recommendations of the Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR were taken into account.8 The amendments strengthened inter alia disclosure and reporting requirements on political parties and electoral contestants, supervision and sanctions available in case of violation of the rules. The 2015 reform, as complemented by some further amendments to the Electoral Code in 2017, was an important step in the right direction. 3 CDL-AD(2013)002 and CDL-AD(2017)012. 4 See OSCE/ODIHR reports on elections in Moldova. 5 See in particular the third round evaluation report on transparency of party funding in the Republic of Moldova of 2011 (GRECO Eval III Rep (2010) 8E) and the subsequent compliance reports. 6 See par 32 of the OSCE Action Plan for the Promotion of Gender Equality adopted by Decision No. 14/04, MC.DEC/14/04 (2004), which refers to commitments to mainstream a gender perspective into OSCE activities; and the Council of Europe’s Gender Equality Strategy 2014-2017, which includes the realisation of gender mainstreaming in all policies and measures as one of five strategic objectives. 7 It is to be noted that the LPP was amended beyond 4 June 2013
Recommended publications
  • There Has Been No Bulgarian Tradition of Any Long-Standing Resistance to the Communist Regime

    There Has Been No Bulgarian Tradition of Any Long-Standing Resistance to the Communist Regime

    There has been no Bulgarian tradition of any long-standing resistance to the communist regime. There was neither any political opposition, nor any other kind of an influential dissident movement. Bulgaria never went through the purgatory of the Hungarian uprising of 1956, or the “Prague spring” of 1968. It is indeed difficult to find any counter arguments whatsoever against the cliché that Bul- garia was the closest satellite of the Soviet Union. The fundamental contradictions within the Union of Democratic Forces (SDS) coalition were present from the very first day of its inception. There were Marxists who were longing for “socialism with a human face”, intellectuals with liberal ideas, social democrats and Christian democrats, conservatives and radical demo- crats, monarchists and republicans. The members of the center-right coalition did not delude themselves about their differences; they rather shared the clear un- derstanding that only a painful compromise could stand some chances against the Goliath of the totalitarian Bulgarian Communist Party (BKP). It was this unani- mous opposition to the communist regime and its legacy that made the coalition possible. But only for a limited period of time. The United Democratic Forces (ODS) government under Prime Minister Ivan Kostov (1997-2001) completed the reformist agenda of anti-communism. At the end of the ODS term of office, Bulgaria was a country with a functioning market economy, stable democracy, and a clearly outlined foreign policy course towards the country’s accession to the European Union and NATO, which was accepted by all significant political formations, the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) included.
  • Vernacular Religion in Diaspora: a Case Study of the Macedono-Bulgarian Group in Toronto

    Vernacular Religion in Diaspora: a Case Study of the Macedono-Bulgarian Group in Toronto

    Vernacular Religion in Diaspora: a Case Study of the Macedono-Bulgarian Group in Toronto By Mariana Dobreva-Mastagar A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Trinity College and the Theological Department of the Toronto School of Theology In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College © Copyright by Mariana Dobreva-Mastagar 2016 Vernacular Religion in Diaspora: a case Study of the Macedono-Bulgarian group in Toronto PhD 2016 Mariana Dobreva-Mastagar University of St.Michael’s College Abstract This study explores how the Macedono-Bulgarian and Bulgarian Eastern Orthodox churches in Toronto have attuned themselves to the immigrant community—specifically to post-1990 immigrants who, while unchurched and predominantly secular, have revived diaspora churches. This paradox raises questions about the ways that religious institutions operate in diaspora, distinct from their operations in the country of origin. This study proposes and develops the concept “institutional vernacularization” as an analytical category that facilitates assessment of how a religious institution relates to communal factors. I propose this as an alternative to secularization, which inadequately captures the diaspora dynamics. While continuing to adhere to their creeds and confessional symbols, diaspora churches shifted focus to communal agency and produced new collective and “popular” values. The community is not only a passive recipient of the spiritual gifts but is also a partner, who suggests new forms of interaction. In this sense, the diaspora church is engaged in vernacular discourse. The notion of institutional vernacularization is tested against the empirical results of field work in four Greater Toronto Area churches.
  • Anti-Communism, Neoliberalisation, Fascism by Bozhin Stiliyanov

    Anti-Communism, Neoliberalisation, Fascism by Bozhin Stiliyanov

    Post-Socialist Blues Within Real Existing Capitalism: Anti-Communism, Neoliberalisation, Fascism by Bozhin Stiliyanov Traykov A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Alberta © Bozhin Stiliyanov Traykov, 2020 Abstract This project draws on Alex William’s (2020) contribution to Gramscian studies with the concept of complex hegemony as an emergent, dynamic and fragile process of acquiring power in socio- political economic systems. It examines anti-communism as an ideological element of neoliberal complex hegemony in Bulgaria. By employing a Gramcian politico-historical analysis I explore examples of material and discursive ideological practices of anti-communism. I show that in Bulgaria, anti-communism strives to operate as hegemonic, common-sensual ideology through legislative acts, production of historiography, cultural and educational texts, and newly invented traditions. The project examines the process of rehabilitation of fascist figures and rise of extreme nationalism, together with discrediting of the anti-fascist struggle and demonizing of the welfare state within the totalitarian framework of anti-communism. Historians Enzo Traverso (2016, 2019), Domenico Losurdo (2011) and Ishay Landa (2010, 2016) have traced the undemocratic roots of economic liberalism and its (now silenced) support of fascism against the “Bolshevik threat.” They have shown that, whether enunciated by fascist regimes or by (neo)liberal intellectuals, anti-communism is deeply undemocratic and shares deep mass-phobic disdain for political organizing of the majority. In this dissertation I argue that, in Bulgaria, anti- communism has not only opened the ideological space for extreme right and fascist politics, it has demoralized left political organizing by attacking any attempts for a politics of socio- economic justice as tyrannical.
  • Addressing the Causes of Terrorism the Club De Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism Volume I

    Addressing the Causes of Terrorism the Club De Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism Volume I

    Addressing the Causes of Terrorism The Club de Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism Volume I THE INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT ON DEMOCRACY, TERRORISM AND SECURITY 8 11March2005Madrid THE INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT ON DEMOCRACY, TERRORISM AND SECURITY 8 11March2005Madrid Addressing the Causes of Terrorism The Club de Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism Volume I The opinions expressed in individual papers are based on the discussions of the working groups at the International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security. They reflect the views of their authors, but not necessarily those of the Club de Madrid or any of its members. The Club de Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism is available in Spanish and English. To order additional copies, please write to: Club de Madrid Felipe IV, 9 – 3º izqda. 28014 Madrid Spain Tel: +34 91 523 72 16 Fax: +34 91 532 00 88 Email: [email protected] © Club de Madrid, 2005 Series editor: Peter R. Neumann Editorial Assistance: Henrik A. Lund and Milburn Line Production: ESC/Scholz & Friends Contents Introduction by Kim Campbell 5 Addressing the Causes of Terrorism Psychology By Jerrold M. Post 7 Political Explanations By Martha Crenshaw 13 Economic Factors By Ted Robert Gurr 19 Religion By Mark Juergensmeyer 27 Culture By Jessica Stern 35 The Club de Madrid Mission and Activities 41 List of Members 42 The Madrid Summit 45 The Madrid Agenda 47 Introduction to the Club de Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism Dear friend, I am delighted to introduce the Club de Madrid Series on Democracy and Terrorism. The policy papers that can be found in this volume are the result of an unparalleled process of debate which culminated at the International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security in Madrid in March 2005.
  • Bulgaria: the Greatest Vacillations Simeon Djankov March 1, 2014 In

    Bulgaria: the Greatest Vacillations Simeon Djankov March 1, 2014 In

    Bulgaria: The Greatest Vacillations Simeon Djankov March 1, 2014 In one of the most famous economics books, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Joseph Schumpeter (1942) predicted the inevitable collapse of capitalism. I grew up in the last two decades of socialism in Bulgaria and as students we were repeatedly told that socialism would prevail in the whole world, and that in Bulgaria it would soon enter its ultimate form, communism. Then everything would be free and nobody would have to work, unless they wanted to. A strange thing to tell children. Luckily, few believed. In the summer of 1989 I finished high-school and took the entrance exams in international relations at the Karl Marx Institute of Economics in Sofia. In my graduating high-school class was also the grandson of the Secretary General of the Bulgarian Communist Party Todor Zhivkov. He, too, fancied a career in diplomacy. This was a problem. There were rigid quotas for entering international studies – for fear of students taking off to the West after graduation – and in that particular year there was only one slot allotted for diplomacy. As luck had it, Zhivkov Junior failed the exams and did what most offspring of totalitarian leaders had done before – went to study in Switzerland. And I entered the Karl Marx Institute. I did not stay long at the Karl Marx Institute, and neither did its name. In December 1988 during a speech at the United Nations Council in New York, Mikhail Gorbachev had declared that the Soviet Union would no longer intervene in the international affairs of other countries from the socialist bloc.
  • 25 Years Freedom in Bulgaria

    25 Years Freedom in Bulgaria

    25 YEARS FREEDOM IN BULGARIA CIVIC EDUCATION | TRANSITION | BERLIN WALL | PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA | FREEDOM | 1989 | INTERPRETATIONS | OPEN LESSONS | MYTHS | LEGENDS | TOTALITARIAN PAST | DESTALINIZATION | BELENE CAMPS | GEORGI MARKOV | FUTURE | CITIZENS | EAST | WEST | SECURITY SERVICE | ECOGLASNOST | CIVIL DUTY AWARD | ANNIVERSARY | COMMUNISM | CAPITALISM | ARCHIVES | REMEMBRANCE| DISSIDENTS | ZHELYO ZHELEV | RADIO FREE EUROPE | VISEGRAD FOUR | HISTORY| POLITICAL STANDARTS | RULE OF LAW | FREE MEDIA | NOSTALGIA | REGIME| MEMORIES | RATIONALIZATION | HUMAN RIGHTS | HOPE | NOW AND THEN | DISCUSSING | VISUAL EVIDENCES | REPRESSIONS | HERITAGE | INTELLECTUAL ELITE | IRON CURTAIN | CENCORSHIP | GENERATIONS | LESSONS | TRANSFORMATION | TODOR ZHIVKOV | COLD WAR | INSTITUTIONS | BEGINNING | INFORMATION | RECONCILIATION | FACTS | EXPERIENCES | CONSENSUS | DISTORTIONS | MARKET ECONOMY | REFORM | UNEMPLOYMENT | THE BIG EXCURSION | IDEOLOGY | PUBLIC OPINION | NATIONAL INITIATIVE | TRUTH | ELECTIONS years ee B 25 years free Bulgaria is a civic initiative under the auspices of the President of Bulgaria, organized by Sofia Platform Fr ulgaria years CONTENT ee B Fr ulgaria CIVIC EDUCATION | TRANSITION | BERLIN WALL | PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA | FREEDOM | 1989 | INTERPRETATIONS | OPEN LESSONS | MYTHS | LEGENDS | TOTALITARIAN PAST | 1. 25 Years Freedom in Bulgaria 02 DESTALINIZATION | BELENE CAMPS | GEORGI MARKOV | FUTURE | CITIZENS | EAST | WEST | SECURITY 2. Remembrance and Culture 04 SERVICE | ECOGLASNOST | CIVIL DUTY AWARD
  • Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies

    Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies

    The London School of Economics and Political Science Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies Giulia Pastorella A thesis submitted to the European Institute of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, February 2016 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86852 words, excluding bibliography, appendix and annexes. Statement of joint work Chapter 3 is based on a paper co-authored with Christopher Wratil. I contributed 50% of this work. 2 Acknowledgements This doctoral thesis would have not been possible without the expert guidance of my two supervisors, Professor Sara Hobolt and Doctor Jonathan White. Each in their own way, they have been essential to the making of the thesis and my growth as an academic and as an individual. I would also like to thank the Economic and Social Research Council for their generous financial support of my doctoral studies through their scholarship.
  • Europe Dialogues No

    Europe Dialogues No

    CUBA – EUROPE DIALOGUES No. 1 / 2007 QUARTERLY BULLETIN ON RELATIONS BETWEEN CUBANS AND EUROPEANS CUBAN VIEWS Cuba Waits for the Day After Cuban Transitional Programs ON TRANSITION EDWARD MCMILLAN-SCOTT 2 NIKOLA HOřejš 4 Ahead of Central Europans: ANALYSIS Draft of Todos Cubanos FREDO ARIAS KING 7 Notes on the Draft Constitution Ready for Changes: APSC In the Hands of the Generals VOjtěcH CEPL 10 LUCAS GARVE 15 JOSÉ ANTONIO FORNARIS 17 Cuba and the Keys Reformists and NGO Charter 77 after Thirty Years OPINION of the Spanish Transition Recommendations KUSÝ MIROSLAV 19 CARLOS ALBERTO MONTANER 12 MARKUS MECKEL 16 NGO Network: CUBA LIBRE IN BULGARIA 25 Document: Warszaw Appeal MAKING STATEMENT 21 Recent Events International Committee for EVENTS WHILE ON HOLIDAY 26 NEW REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS 23 Democracy in Cuba 30 ISHR SUES CUBA AT THE UN 27 2007 Events 32 photo by Pavel Hroch by photo Pavel CUBA WAITS FOR THE DAY AFTER Edward McMillan-Scott he autumn streets of Havana are The only colour on the crumbling colo- sons’ imprisonment in 2003 for crimes dark at night. The few electric nial buildings comes from political slo- against the state. A token 75 political Tlights are reserved for the main high- gans extolling the 1957 revolution led activists had been rounded up. ways. Side streets are lit only by the by Los Hermanos Castro (‘The Castro occasional patched-up pre-revolution Brothers’). One is the dictator Fidel, The Women were eager to talk, eager Buick or Chevrolet, sometimes an open dying from stomach cancer, the other to know my opinion about what hap- door throws neon light onto the pave- his notoriously boozy brother Raul.
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1998 - June 30,1999 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-•1789 TTele . (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www.cfr.org E-mail communications@cfr. org Officers and Directors, 1999–2000 Officers Directors Term Expiring 2004 Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 2000 John Deutch Chairman of the Board Jessica P.Einhorn Carla A. Hills Maurice R. Greenberg Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Robert D. Hormats* Vice Chairman Maurice R. Greenberg William J. McDonough* Leslie H. Gelb Theodore C. Sorensen President George J. Mitchell George Soros* Michael P.Peters Warren B. Rudman Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Term Expiring 2001 Leslie H. Gelb Officer, and National Director ex officio Lee Cullum Paula J. Dobriansky Vice President, Washington Program Mario L. Baeza Honorary Officers David Kellogg Thomas R. Donahue and Directors Emeriti Vice President, Corporate Affairs, Richard C. Holbrooke Douglas Dillon and Publisher Peter G. Peterson† Caryl P.Haskins Lawrence J. Korb Robert B. Zoellick Charles McC. Mathias Jr. Vice President, Studies David Rockefeller Term Expiring 2002 Elise Carlson Lewis Honorary Chairman Vice President, Membership Paul A. Allaire and Fellowship Affairs Robert A. Scalapino Roone Arledge Abraham F. Lowenthal Cyrus R.Vance John E. Bryson Vice President Glenn E. Watts Kenneth W. Dam Anne R. Luzzatto Vice President, Meetings Frank Savage Janice L. Murray Laura D’Andrea Tyson Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2003 Judith Gustafson Secretary Peggy Dulany Martin S.
  • Collaborative

    Collaborative

    TEACHING THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNISM TEACHING THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNISM Published by: Hannah Arendt Center – Sofia 2013 This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies, the Hannah Arendt Center - Sofia and Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. The Centre for European Studies, the Hannah Arendt Center -Sofia, the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or any subsequent use of the information contained therein. Sole responsibility lies on the author of the publication. The processing of the publication was concluded in 2013 The Centre for European Studies (CES) is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP) dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.thinkingeurope.eu TEACHING THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNISM Editor: Vasil Kadrinov Print: AVTOPRINT www.avtoprint.com E-mail: [email protected] Phohe: +359 889 032 954 2 Kiril Hristov Str., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Teaching the History of the Communism Content Teaching the History of the Communist Regimes in Post-1989 Eastern Europe - Methodological and Sensitive Issues, Raluca Grosescu ..................5 National representative survey on the project: “Education about the communist regime and the european democratic values of the young people in Bulgaria today”, 2013 .......................................................14 Distribution of the data of the survey ...........................................................43 - 3 - Teaching the History of the Communism Teaching the History of the Communist Regimes in Post-1989 Eastern Europe Methodological and Sensitive Issues Raluca Grosescu The breakdown of dictatorial regimes generally implies a process of rewriting history through school curricula and textbooks.
  • Bulgaria's 1996 Parliamentary Elections

    Bulgaria's 1996 Parliamentary Elections

    BULGARIA April 1996 Parliamentary Election Report Copyright© 1996 International Republican Institute Issued July 1996 Table of Contents Tab 1......................Background Tab 2......................The 1994 Elections Tab 3......................Parliamentary Groups Tab 4......................Non-Parliamentary Groups Tab 5......................Representative Seating Charts Tab 6......................Bulgaria Political Situation Update Tab 7......................Appendix 1: Chronology of 1994 Activities Tab 8......................Appendix 2: Chronology of IRI's Early Efforts BULGARIA BACKGROUND In March 1994, the International Republican Institute (IRI) renewed its program to assist Bulgarian national parties and coalitions with the development and operation of their grassroots structures and to strengthen communications between national and local party organizations. IRI's resident program officer conducted over 80 one-day workshops throughout the country during 1994 and four major conferences on media communications, voter contact programs, message development, research and polling, local party organization and election law. The conferences and workshops were designed to assist the development of parties not represented in parliament and prepare them for the upcoming parliamentary elections as well as continue to help parties represented in the Parliament with the strengthening of their organizations and coalitions. The ultimate goal was to help all parties extend their outreach to voters in Bulgaria, ensure electoral success for a
  • Uncaptive Minds

    Uncaptive Minds

    Uncaptive Minds Special Issue: 25 Years After 1989 Reflections on Unfinished Revolutions Summer 2015 UNCAPTIVE MINDS SPECIAL ISSUE • 25 YEARS AFTER 1989 REFLECTIONS ON UNFINISHED REVOLUTIONS ISSN: 0897–9669 EDITORS: ERIC CHENOWETH AND IRENA LASOTA Cover Design by Małgorzata Flis © Copyright 2015 by the Institute for Democracy in Eastern Europe. This Special Issue of Uncaptive Minds is being published as part of the seminar project, “25 Years After 1989: Time for Reflection on Unfinished Business.” The Special Issue includes the full edited papers, responses, and discussion among the seminar participants. A report of the seminar summarizing the findings of the seminar is published separately under the title “IDEE Special Report: 25 Years After 1989: Reflections on Unfin- ished Revolutions.” The seminar, Special Issue of Uncaptive Minds, and Special Report were made possible in part by a grant of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. • The Special Issue of Uncaptive Minds and the Special Report are available online at IDEE’s new web site, www.idee-us.org. • Requests for permission for reproduction of the Special Issue of Uncaptive Minds or “IDEE Special Report: 25 Years After 1989” should be sent to: [email protected]. Send ATTN: Permission for Use. • Price: Print copies are available for cost of shipping and handling as listed below. Send a request with a check or money order made out to “IDEE” to: IDEE 1718 M Street, No. 147 Washington, DC 20036 Special Issue of Uncaptive Minds: 25 Years After 1989 US: Single Copy: $7.50. Additional Copies at: $5.00/apiece. IDEE Special Report: “25 Years After 1989” US: Single Copy: $5.00.