Downloaded for Each Phylum, but Not All Were Used in Phylogenetic Analyses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON Faculty of Engineering, Science, and Mathematics School of Ocean and Earth Science Resolving phylogenetic relationships within the order Enoplida (Phylum Nematoda) by Holly Marie Bik Thesis of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2010 Graduate School of the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton This PhD Dissertation by Holly Marie Bik has been produced under the supervision of the following persons Supervisors Prof John Lambshead Dr Lawrence Hawkins Dr Alan Hughes Dr David Lunt Research Advisor Prof W. Kelley Thomas Chair of Advisory Panel Dr Martin Sheader 2 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE & MATHEMATICS SCHOOL OF OCEAN & EARTH SCIENCE Doctor of Philosophy RESOLVING PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE ORDER ENOPLIDA (PHYLUM NEMATODA) by Holly Marie Bik The Order Enoplida (Phylum Nematoda) has been proposed as a divergent nematode lineage—Enoplid nematodes are thought to exhibit morphological and developmental characteristics present in the ‘ancestral nematode’. However, previous molecular phylogenies have failed to unequivocally confirm the position of this group. The Enoplida is primarily comprised of free-living marine species; if these taxa represent close relatives of the nematode ancestor, this relationship would presumably imply a marine origin for the phylum. Prior to this investigation, few publically available gene sequences existed for Enoplid nematodes, and published sequences represented only shallow water fauna from Northwest Europe. This study has aimed to improve resolution at the base of the nematode tree, using drastically increased taxon-sampling within the previously neglected Enoplid clade. Morphological identifications, nuclear gene sequences (18S and 28S rRNA), and mitochondrial gene sequences (Cox1) were obtained from marine specimens representing a variety of deep-sea and intertidal habitats. Molecular data were used to assess the phylogenetic placement of the Enoplid clade, resolve internal taxonomic relationships within this group, and investigate relationships between shallow water and deep-sea fauna. Despite rigorous empirical testing and comprehensive taxon sampling, large-scale phylogenetic analyses based on 18S rRNA sequences (using both Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference methods) failed to provide added resolution at the base of the nematode tree. Molecular data from the 18S rRNA gene was unable to confirm the placement of Enoplida as a divergent lineage representing the sister taxon to all other nematodes. These findings highlight the limitations of the 18S gene for resolving the deepest evolutionary splits amongst nematode clades. Analysis of internal relationships reveals that the Enoplida is split into two main clades, with groups consisting of terrestrial and primarily marine fauna, respectively. For marine taxa, deep-sea and shallow-water specimens from the same genus consistently appear as sister taxa. Deep-sea nematode species may have arisen via several evolutionary routes; some deep-sea clades appear to represent recently derived forms, while other groups seem to have radiated much earlier. Nematodes from deep-sea sites exhibit no obvious clustering according to depth or geographic location, and specimens represent a wide taxonomic range within the Enoplida. In addition, there seems to be some molecular evidence for purportedly cosmopolitan nematode species; identical gene sequences were recorded between distant shallow water locations, as well as between deep-sea and shallow water habitats. Data from Enoplid nematodes suggests an intriguing pattern for nematode species distributions—validating these preliminary insights will require a large amount of molecular data from many additional geographic locations. Future studies will also need to incorporate data from additional genetic loci (or use phylogenomic methods) in order to build robust deep phylogenies. 3 Table of Contents ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................3 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................4 List of Tables........................................................................................................................6 List of Figures ......................................................................................................................8 List of Accompanying Material...........................................................................................12 DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP.........................................................................................13 Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................14 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................15 1.1 An understudied phylum..........................................................................................15 1.2 Limitations of nematode morphology and taxonomy...............................................16 1.3 Molecular investigations in nematodes....................................................................17 1.3.1 The 18S ribosomal RNA gene.............................................................................19 1.3.2 The 28S ribosomal subunit gene........................................................................21 1.3.3 The Internal Transcribed Spacer Region ............................................................22 1.3.4 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I.........................................................................22 1.3.5 Other genetic methods .....................................................................................23 1.4 Practical applications of molecular data...................................................................25 1.4.1 DNA Barcoding..................................................................................................25 1.4.2 Future prospects ...............................................................................................27 1.5 Molecular evolution.................................................................................................28 1.6 Reconstructing evolution using phylogenetic methods ............................................31 1.6.1 Alignment Construction ....................................................................................31 1.6.2 Phylogenetic reconstruction..............................................................................34 1.6.3 Building molecular phylogenies.........................................................................36 1.6.3.1 Algorithmic methods..................................................................................37 1.6.3.2 Criterion-based methods............................................................................39 1.6.3.2.1 Parsimony............................................................................................39 1.6.3.2.2 Maximum Likelihood ...........................................................................40 1.6.3.2.3 Bayesian Inference ..............................................................................41 1.6.4 Models for estimating molecular evolution.......................................................42 1.6.5 Gauging support for tree topologies..................................................................45 1.6.6 Choosing a phylogenetic method ......................................................................48 1.7 Recent molecular phylogenies of the Phylum Nematoda .........................................49 1.8 Unresolved questions in nematode phylogenetics ...................................................50 1.8.1 Resolving early splits amongst nematodes ........................................................50 1.8.2 Internal relationships within the order Enoplida................................................53 1.8.3 The origin of deep-sea fauna.............................................................................64 1.9 Conclusions..............................................................................................................65 1.10 Aims and Objectives...............................................................................................66 2. Materials and Methods.................................................................................................67 2.1 Sampling Regime .....................................................................................................67 2.1.2 Collection of shallow water samples..................................................................67 2.1.3 Collection of deep-sea samples .........................................................................68 2.1.4 Sample processing.............................................................................................68 2.2 Time Series experiments..........................................................................................72 2.3 Taxonomic identification and video capture of Enoplid specimens...........................73 2.4 Final protocol for DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing ..........................................73 2.5 Attempts to amplify other informative loci .............................................................76 4 2.5.1 Orthologous nuclear genes...............................................................................76