Nine Myths About Kosovo by Rebecca Grant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nine Myths About Kosovo by Rebecca Grant One year after Operation Allied Force, some strange notions have taken root. Nine Myths About Kosovo By Rebecca Grant ICTORY through airpower was a seductive slogan in the US around the time of World War II, but this is not “ V the time to re-embrace that myth.” Thus warned a Los Angeles Times editorial in June 1999, just as Operation Allied USAF photo by SrA. Jeffrey Allen Force was ending. Actually, we’ve witnessed the emergence of a new and different crop of myths—numerous untruths and half-truths which have clouded the role of aerospace power and the outcome of the air campaign. Over the past year, doubters have made many claims about what NATO’s airmen did and did not do. They’ve made it look as though the operation was more failure than success. “The past year has seen the operational lessons of Kosovo become encrusted with It is fashionable now to claim old myths about airpower and warfare. Each myth touches on deeper questions that allied airmen did not hit about strategy and military force and reflects pre-existing beliefs and doctrines.” Yugoslav tanks or artillery, that it An Air Force F-16 at Aviano AB, Italy, just before an April 4, 1999, mission. took a Kosovo Liberation Army ground offensive to push Slobodan Milosevic’s Serb army forces out of hiding, that airmen shied away from NATO commander, US Army Gen. ing how to allocate national resources operating at low altitude for reasons Wesley K. Clark, told Congress, and lay plans for maintaining national of personal safety, and that pilots the one indispensable condition for security in the future. mostly hit decoys instead of real victory was the success of the air Myths often contain grains of targets. In extreme cases, doubters campaign. truth, but the myths about aerospace have said that the air war was just Unfortunately, the past year has power and Allied Force threaten to too immaculate and broke the rules seen the operational lessons of Ko- distort the findings from this unusual of “just war.” sovo become encrusted with old campaign. If these myths were to be Operation Allied Force was a hard- myths about airpower and warfare. credited, one would have to conclude won success for NATO. Diplomacy Each myth touches on deeper ques- that aerospace power is nothing and determination played their roles tions about strategy and military force more than a flashy, unreliable tool in resolving the Kosovo crisis, and, and reflects pre-existing beliefs and of military force. No leader would even now, Kosovo’s long-term fate doctrines. Each myth also represents a long rely on such a force to protect remains unclear. However, as the top potential stumbling block in consider- national interests. 50 AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2000 Myth 1: Kosovo proves that the “halt phase” strategy is a non-starter. Since the mid-1990s, defense or disprove the halt phase theory. One a few days of bombing on a limited plans have called for the air com- such opinion came from the comman- set of targets. From the operational ponent to rapidly halt invading dant of the US Army War College, perspective, it was too late for a enemy ground forces in a regional Maj. Gen. Robert H. Scales Jr. He halt phase operation. With refugees, conflict. Yugo slav regular military concluded, “The Serbian dash into the Kosovo Liberation Army, and and special police forces had been Kosovo demonstrates the particular Yugoslav forces colliding across engaged in fighting with the Kosovo futility of attempting to pre-empt an Kosovo, the situation had long since Liberation Army for a year before enemy force using airpower alone.” become a morass of close combat the start of Allied Force, making it Scales went on to suggest that land without a traditional front line. too late to prevent an “invasion.” forces made better tools for strategic NATO did not have enough forces in However, in March 1999, another pre-emption. theater to provide 24-hour coverage contingent of Yugoslav army forces The mythmakers might believe of Yugoslav troops on the move. At- massed and began Operation Horse- that the halt phase failed, but the tacks on mobile ground targets did shoe, Milosevic’s attempt to drive facts were that, for political rea- not begin until the second week of the ethnic Albanian population out sons, there was no opportunity for April. NATO’s desire for a limited of Kosovo. NATO air power to halt or reverse air campaign took the halt phase At first glance, Operation Horse- the drive of the Yugoslav army. strike option off the table before it shoe seemed to be a chance to prove Long-standing intentions called for could even be considered. Myth 2: Air attacks on fielded forces ultimately were of no importance to the outcome of the war. This is a myth of classical propor- tions, for it reaches back as far as the earliest employment of airpower in DoD photo World War I. The stalemate on the Western Front led to a desire to at- tack the arms-producing industries that fed the war and to target the morale of the enemy’s nation. Yet even in 1918, airpower also proved its value in strikes against enemy airpower, army troops, command posts, lines of communication, and rear-area supplies. In every conflict since, theater commanders have tasked air to at- tack fielded forces, from World War II to Korea and Vietnam. In Opera- tion Desert Storm, ground order of battle targets made up 65 percent of the targets in the air tasking order of Central Air Forces. These included “One of NATO’s major goals was to inflict damage on the Yugoslav army. Tar -gets 33,560 of 51,146 total targets. like military barracks, ammunition dumps, and lines of communication also made up a significant fraction of fixed targets. It is just a myth to claim that these attacks The rule of thumb is that Command- were of no importance.” A bombed-out storage depot used by Yugoslav forces. ers in Chief always want to target adversary ground forces that are ac- tive in the battle area. In Ko sovo, the munication also made up a significant identifying ground force targets and Yugoslav ground forces were burning fraction of the fixed targets. that this is part of the joint forces air houses and driving out refugees, so The case can be made that NATO component commander’s job for the the pressure to target them came from should have prepared earlier to sus- CINC, from Day 1. Responsibility all sides. Ultimately, one of NATO’s tain air attacks on Yugoslav army lies with the air component, not just major goals was to inflict damage on forces, but it is just a myth to claim with the land component. In the end, the Yugoslav army and degrade its that these attacks were of no impor- it was the combination of pressure ability to threaten Kosovo’s popula- tance. Indeed, the serious point that on the armed forces and attacks on tion. Targets like military barracks, emerges from this myth is that com- major strategic targets that made the ammunition dumps, and lines of com- mand of aerospace power includes air war effective. AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2000 51 Myth 3: The Yugoslav army got away unscathed. Within days of Milosevic’s capitu- mission reports, gun camera video, Storm were higher, but, by percent- lation, Serbian generals told West­­ern and all other sources in what must age, airmen of Allied Force inflicted newspapers their army had lost only surely have been the most thorough significant damage on the Yugoslav 13 tanks to NATO airmen. The Sunday review of data in the history of war- army. In addition, military facilities Times of London reported that the fare. To count as a validated “hit,” such as barracks and ammunition 11-week NATO bombing campaign the report had to be confirmed by depots comprised about a quarter of did almost no damage to Serb fielded two or more sources. Validated hits the fixed or strategic target list. forces in Kosovo. Many were eager on targets within two kilometers of Clark made these findings public to demonstrate that the claims of each other were counted as a single in September 1999. He sent teams to aerospace power were exaggerated. hit. Despite the stringent criteria, NATO capitals to brief the assessment Serb propaganda played directly Clark’s team found that NATO airmen to allied leaders. Still, in December into a powerful myth that aircraft tallied 974 validated hits on tanks, 1999, The Washington Post reported are not good at destroying mobile Armored Personnel Carriers, artillery that airmen “did not manage to destroy ground targets. Behind that myth pieces, and trucks. a large part of the Yugoslav army in is the premise that it takes ground Raw numbers aside, the percent- Kosovo.” forces to achieve decisive results ages also made clear the Yugoslav Asserting that the Yugoslav army against enemy armies and that air army sustained heavy damage. Of- got away unscathed simply doesn’t plays only a supporting role, scor- ficial data show that the Yugoslav square with the evidence. During ing an occasional lucky hit or two, army in Kosovo lost 26 percent of the Cold War, planners believed a but without the weight and mass its tanks, 34 percent of its APCs, and division that lost 25 to 30 percent central to a campaign of maneuver 47 percent of the artillery to the air of its equipment and forces would and fires.
Recommended publications
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000
    Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000 Volume III Peter Wiles Mark Bradbury Manuela Mece Margie Buchanan-Smith Nicola Norman Steve Collins Ana Prodanovic John Cosgrave Jane Shackman Alistair Hallam Fiona Watson Overseas Development Institute In association with Valid International August 2000 ,QGHSHQGHQW(YDOXDWLRQRI([SHQGLWXUH RI'(&.RVRYR$SSHDO)XQGV 3KDVHV,DQG,,$SULO¤-DQXDU\ 7KHHYDOXDWLRQFRQVLVWVRIWKUHHYROXPHVRIZKLFKWKLVLVWKHWKLUG 9ROXPH,0DLQ)LQGLQJVRIWKH(YDOXDWLRQ 9ROXPH,,6HFWRUDO6HFWLRQV LQFOXGLQJDVHFWLRQRQ:DU$IIHFWHG 3RSXODWLRQVDQG%HQHILFLDULHV 9ROXPH,,,,QGLYLGXDO'(&$JHQF\6XPPDULHV Overseas Development Institute :HVWPLQVWHU %ULGJH 5RDG /RQGRQ 6( -' 7HO )D[ (PDLO KSJ#RGLRUJXN :HEVLWH ZZZRGLRUJXN *UHDW 3RUWODQG 6WUHHW /RQGRQ :1 $+ 7HO )D[ )XUWKHUGHWDLOVDERXWWKLVHYDOXDWLRQFDQEHIRXQGRQWKH'(&ZHEVLWHDW ZZZGHFRUJXN &RYHU:DLWLQJIRUDKRXVHWREHUHEXLOWLQ.RVRYR 3KRWRJUDSKWDNHQE\-RKQ&RVJUDYHGXULQJWKH(YDOXDWLRQ)LHOGZRUN0DUFK 'LVDVWHUV(PHUJHQF\&RPPLWWHH Preface Preface This volume of the DEC Kosovo Evaluation contains summaries of each agency’s DEC funded activities. Each agency section also looks at key issues relating to performance which the evaluation team felt merited comment. This volume should be read in conjunction with Volumes I and II of the Report. Volume I contains the main findings of the evaluation, together with overall conclusions and an executive summary. Volume II contains sections on sectoral topics, such as food and nutrition, shelter and
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Kosovo: Another Balkans War?
    R� from AUSA 's Institute of Land Warfare Implications of Kosovo: Another Balkans War? For centuries the Balkan Peninsula has been the more violent eruption has increased since 1989, when geographic crossroad for ethnic, religious and the autonomy of the province under the former .· nationalistic fervor - where East meets West. The Yugoslavia was rescinded and it was placed under region includes Albania, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, virtual martial law; in response, ethnic Albanians have European Turkey, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia­ put into effect their own state structure and openly Herzegovina, Macedonia and the Federal Republic of advocate independence from Serbia. This situation, Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). leading to periodic violent clashes between the Serbian government and the ethnic Albanian majority, has Shortly after the end of the Cold War, the former continued throughout the process· of international Yugoslav republics of Slovenia and Macedonia were peacekeeping fostered by the Dayton Accords. The able to break away from Yugoslavia, essentially Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) emerged and has without open conflict. Croatia and Bosnia­ initiated a paramilitary campaign to challenge Serbian Herzegovina, however, dissolved into civil war, pitting authority. the centuries-old Muslim, Croat and Serb communities against one another. Both Serbia and Croatia actively In early March, the Serbian government deployed supported their ethnic brothers in the fighting. forces to Kosovo to root out KLA leaders, in apparent response to previous incidents involving loss of life 1995 The Dayton Accords, along with the strong among Serbian policemen. The extensive violence and show of force exhibited by NATO subsequent to the loss of life visited by the Serbian force upon ethnic United Nations effort, brought the fighting to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo War and Changing Ethnic Boundaries: 1980-2015
    Kosovo War and Changing Ethnic Boundaries: 1980-2015 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Pllana, Valone. 2017. Kosovo War and Changing Ethnic Boundaries: 1980-2015. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33826513 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Kosovo War and Changing Ethnic Boundaries: 1980-2015 Valone Pllana A Thesis in the Field of International Relations for the Degree of Masters in Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University March 2017 2017 Valone Pllana Abstract The Kosovo War and the resulting humanitarian crisis of 1990s, gained international attention from the nature of massacres and war crimes, as well as the Serbian government’s systematic ethnic cleansing campaign against Kosovar-majority ethnic group in Kosovo. Since the military humanitarian intervention in 1999, reconciliation process initiated by the European Union, U.S., and other members in the international community, began almost immediately after the war, in attempt to bring peace to the former Yugoslav republic and territory. However, little effort has been made in attempt to dissect and analyze the causes of the ethnic conflict, such as patterns of ethnic boundaries, given that ethnic tensions continue to challenge the peace-building process. This thesis research, therefore, investigates ethnic relations and changing ethnic boundaries in Kosovo between the years of 1980 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian National Army
    Response to Information Request ZZZ102898.E Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada www.irb-cisr.gc.ca Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIRs | Help The Board 27 August 2008 About the Board ZZZ102898.E Biographies Organization Chart Kosovo/Albania: Albanian National Army (Armata Kombetare Shqiptare, AKSh) operating in Kosovo Employment Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa Legal and Policy References Background Publications Tribunal Jane's Information Group, an intelligence provider used by business, Refugee Protection government and military decision-makers (n.d.), reports that the Albanian National Division Army (Armata Kombetare Shqiptare, AKSh) has existed since 1999 (6 Apr. 2005). In slight contrast, a Southeast European Times (SE Times) article states that the Immigration Division AKSh was established in 2001 (14 Nov. 2007). Immigration Appeal Division A Kosovo-based Research Associate at Durham University who specializes in Decisions security matters stated in a telephone interview with the Research Directorate that the AKSh is a pan-Albanian movement that seeks to unify all Albanian-speaking Forms territories (Research Associate 30 July 2008; AP 21 Nov. 2007) including Albania, Statistics Kosovo, southern Serbia, western Macedonia, southern Montenegro (PHW 2007 Research 2007, 19-20) and northern Greece (Research Associate 30 July 2008; see also BIRN 2008). Similarly, Freedom House states that the AKSh supports "creating a Research Program 'Greater Albania' in the Balkans" (2008). In contrast, Arberi, identified by two National media sources as the leader of the AKSh (B92 21 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo Conflict U.S
    CPD PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY Paper 3, 2009 The Kosovo Conflict U.S. Diplomacy and Western Public Opinion by Mark Smith La Diplomatie Publique Общественная дипломатия Public Diplomacy Publiczna Dyplomacja הסברה Publieksdiplomatie D ip lo m a c ia P ú b lic a 公共外交 Δημόσια Διπλωματία Публична дипломация Kosovo Conflict: U.S. Public Diplomacy and Western Public Opinion Mark Smith Center on Public Diplomacy University of Southern California Figueroa Press Los Angeles Kosovo Conflict: U.S. Public Diplomacy and Western Public Opinion Mark Smith Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2009 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-1-932800-61-6
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo 2020 Human Rights Report
    KOSOVO 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kosovo is a parliamentary democracy. The constitution and laws provide for an elected unicameral parliament (the Assembly), which in turn elects a president, whose choice of prime minister must be approved by the Assembly. Parliamentary elections were last held in October 2019 in a process generally considered free and fair, although European Union election observers noted that misuse of public resources and a lack of transparency of campaign finances resulted in an uneven playing field throughout the country. The Assembly was constituted in December 2019 with Albin Kurti confirmed as prime minister in February. After a no- confidence vote unseated Kurti’s government in March, Avdullah Hoti became prime minister on June 3 in a reconstituted government. Security forces include the Kosovo Police and the Kosovo Security Force, which respectively report to the Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Defense. The government continued the process of gradually transitioning the Kosovo Security Force into a territorial defense force in accordance with a 10-year plan which began in 2019. The Border Police, a subgroup of the Kosovo Police, are responsible for security at the border. Police maintain internal security, with the European Union rule-of-law mission in the country as a second responder for incidents of unrest. The NATO-led Kosovo Force, an international peacekeeping force, is a third responder. NATO’s Kosovo Force is responsible for providing a safe and secure environment and ensuring freedom of movement for all citizens. As of August, NATO’s Kosovo Force mission had approximately 3,400 troops from 27 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Repression and Violence in Kosovo and Kosovo: the Humanitarian Perspective
    REPRESSION AND VIOLENCE IN KOSOVO AND KOSOVO: THE HUMANITARIAN PERSPECTIVE TWO HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 18, 1998 AND JUNE 25, 1998 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 105-2-1 AND 106-2-2] Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.csce.gov REPRESSION AND VIOLENCE IN KOSOVO WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, 1998 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE WASHINGTON, DC. The Commission met, in Room 430, the Dirksen Senate Office Build- ing, Washington, DC., at 10:08 a.m., Hon. Alfonse D'Amato, Chair- man, presiding. Commissioners present: Hon. Christopher H. Smith; Hon. Benjamin Cardin; and Hon. Steny H. Hoyer. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN ALPHONSE D'AMATO Chairman D'Amato. Today's hearing of the Commission on Secu- rity and Cooperation in Europe is called to examine the current, criti- cal situation in Kosovo. In recent days, continuing Serbian repres- sion of the Kosovar Albanian Majority Population has triggered an escalating spiral of violence that demands U.S. leadership now to stop another outbreak of ethnic cleansing and to achieve a peaceful reso- lution to the crisis. This is one of the times when all people of conscience must speak out, and we must take action to stop the slaughter of innocent men, women, and children. Our distinguished panel of witnesses includes Mr. Isa Zymberi, who is the Director of the London Office of the Kosovo Information Cen- ter. Mr. Zymberi is a principal international spokesman for the lead- ership of the non-recognized Republic of Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Reintegration and War Commemoration. the Case of the Kosovo Liberation Army
    Südosteuropa 58 (2010), H. 4, S. 478-519 ISABEL STRöHLE The Politics of Reintegration and War Commemoration. The Case of the Kosovo Liberation Army Abstract. This article examines the contentious question of the appropriate position of veterans in a postwar society, by juxtaposing the externally led reintegration policies with local concep- tions of (re-)integration propagated in the veterans’ circles of the Kosovo Liberation Army. Reintegration assistance, a constituent part of post-conflict reconstruction efforts, ultimately aims at demilitarization by supporting the return of former combatants to civilian life in the wake of armed conflict. As is illustrated with the case of Kosovo, reintegration programs can hardly live up to their overly ambitious aims; the assumed division between the combatants and the rest of the society is problematic in the context of partisan warfare. Despite pledges to contextual sensitivity, reintegration programs cannot do justice to the complexity of postwar realities. Hence, if disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) is to be successful beyond dismantling the machinery of war, more attention has to be paid to existing social cleavages and group boundaries formed on the basis of varying wartime experiences. Isabel Ströhle is pursuing a Ph.D. in the Department of History at the University of Munich. Introduction The Republic of Kosovo unilaterally declared independence on 17 February, 2008,1 nine years after the war (officially conflict) in Kosovo had come to an end.2 During this decade one of the most complex UN missions in the history of peace-building and postwar reconstruction was launched. The disarmament, 1 The research for this article was financed by the Berghof Foundation for Conflict Studies in the framework of the 28-month research project entitled “The role of non-state actors in the conflict transformation of the conflicts in Macedonia and in Kosovo”, which was housed at the University of Munich and supervised by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo & Montenegro
    School of Social Sciences Kosovo & Montenegro Why Different Outcomes? Bachelor’s Thesis in Political Science Fall Term 2008 Author: Mimoza Ardolic Supervisor: Lennart Bergfeldt Abstract University of Växjö, School of Social Sciences Course: PO 5363, Political Science Title: Kosovo & Montenegro – Why Different Outcomes? Author: Mimoza Ardolic Supervisor: Lennart Bergfeldt Date: 2008-01-15 The purpose of this study has been to assess why the pursuit for independence turned out to be a matter of such difficulty in the case of Kosovo and not in Montenegro, seeing as they are two apparent similar cases. The research questions are: How can it be that two analogous situations where two regions (Kosovo and Montenegro), quite similar in several aspects, want independence from the same country (Serbia) result in so different outcomes? Why has Kosovo’s attempt to achieve self-government been such a difficulty? Why did Montenegro manage to achieve autonomy without (great) difficulties? The findings are that despite the similarity between these two cases, they have ample differing characteristics as well. The factors detected are that whilst the Kosovo conflict is characterized by: a troublesome history, no common ground, an existing deep hatred, Russian opposition and the nationalist Milošević; the Montenegrin case is set apart by: an intertwining, rather peaceful history, friendly relations, Russian cordiality and the nationalist Djukanović. The interpretation of these elements according to the nationalist theory is as follows: Milošević and Djukanović (and their ideology: nationalism) are the real causes. The other elements are mere means to their ambition for nation building. The difference between these two men and the elements (their means) explains the different outcomes in the two cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo, Nato, and Strategic Bombing
    The Lessons and Non-Lessons of the Air and Missile Campaign in Kosovo Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Revised August, 2000 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. The Air and Missile Campaign in Kosovo 9/17/03 Page ii Table of Contents I. THE LESSONS AND NON-LESSONS OF THE NATO AIR AND MISSILE CAMPAIGN IN KOSOVO .1 II. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: THE COURSE AND CHARACTER OF THE NATO CAMPAIGN .....................................................................................................................................................................................3 BOSNIA AND THE DAYTON ACCORDS BECOME THE PRELUDE TO WAR IN KOSOVO................................................. 4 THE DIPLOMATIC PRELUDE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 PEACE TALKS END IN WAR ................................................................................................................................... 13 Serbia’s Grand Strategic and Tactical Mistakes .............................................................................................13 NATO’s Blundering into Large-Scale War ......................................................................................................14 OPERATION ALLIED FORCE: THE AIR AND MISSILE CAMPAIGN ............................................................................. 16 The Phases and Non-Phases of the Air and Missile Campaign .......................................................................17
    [Show full text]