DOCSLIB.ORG

CITY of NEW HAVEN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Updatecommunity Feedback Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CITY OF NEW HAVEN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATECommunity Feedback Survey 1. In which New Haven neighborhood do you live? Response Response Percent Count Amity 1.0% 8 Annex 2.3% 19 Beaver Hills 5.0% 42 City Point 1.8% 15 Cedar Hill 0.5% 4 Downtown 6.2% 52 Dixwell 3.6% 30 Dwight 3.9% 33 East Rock 13.8% 116 East Shore 5.7% 48 Edgewood 3.6% 30 Fair Haven 5.1% 43 Fair Haven Heights 3.8% 32 Hill North 2.5% 21 Hill South 2.5% 21 Long Wharf 0.1% 1 Prospect Hill 1.5% 13 Quinnipiac Meadows 1.4% 12 Newhallville 7.5% 63 Wooster Square/Mill River 3.8% 32 1 of 146 West River 4.9% 41 West Rock 4.2% 35 Westville 15.4% 129 If you do not live in the city, please specify where you live: 55 answered question 840 skipped question 77 2 of 146 2. In which New Haven neighborhood do you work? Response Response Percent Count Amity 1.1% 7 Annex 0.6% 4 Beaver Hills 1.6% 10 City Point 0.8% 5 Cedar Hill 1.0% 6 Downtown 47.7% 300 Dixwell 3.7% 23 Dwight 1.6% 10 East Rock 5.2% 33 East Shore 0.6% 4 Edgewood 1.6% 10 Fair Haven 4.6% 29 Fair Haven Heights 1.3% 8 Hill North 3.3% 21 Hill South 3.0% 19 Long Wharf 5.2% 33 Prospect Hill 1.1% 7 Quinnipiac Meadows 0.2% 1 Newhallville 3.5% 22 Wooster Square/Mill River 1.9% 12 West River 2.2% 14 West Rock 2.9% 18 Westville 5.2% 33 3 of 146 If you do not work in the city, please specify where you work: 247 answered question 629 skipped question 288 3. Do you attend a college or university in New Haven? Response Response Percent Count Yes 14.4% 125 No 85.6% 745 answered question 870 skipped question 47 4. For how long have you lived, worked, or attended a college or university in New Haven? Response Response Percent Count Less than 5 years 20.1% 172 5-10 years 15.8% 135 10-20 years 17.8% 152 More than 20 years 46.3% 396 answered question 855 skipped question 62 4 of 146 5. Rating from Least Important to Very Important, how important are the following general planning and design objectives to you? Least Somewhat Very Rating Rating Neutral Important Important Important Important Average Count Creating a comprehensive plan for 16.7% 34.2% 29.6% 7.5% (60) 11.9% (95) 3.66 795 the waterfront (133) (272) (235) Maintaining and enhancing the 14.0% 42.8% 28.2% 4.3% (34) 10.8% (86) 3.80 795 visual appearance of all buildings (111) (340) (224) Preserving the city's historic 11.7% 37.1% 38.9% 4.1% (33) 8.2% (65) 3.98 797 character (93) (296) (310) Promoting development of New 21.0% 35.5% 27.1% 6.6% (52) 9.9% (78) 3.66 787 Haven's harbor (165) (279) (213) Promoting neighborhood specific 14.8% 37.1% 39.2% 3.6% (28) 5.4% (42) 4.03 784 planning (116) (291) (307) Reducing housing density (number 26.9% 32.3% 15.8% 15.2% 9.7% (76) 2.83 783 of housing units per acre of land) (211) (253) (124) (119) Increasing housing density (number 24.4% 32.9% 16.7% 14.0% of housing units per acre of land 12.1% (94) 2.84 779 (190) (256) (130) (109) area) Reforming the city's zoning code of 33.1% 27.4% 23.1% ordinances which regulates various 6.9% (54) 9.5% (75) 3.50 788 (261) (216) (182) types of land uses in the city Other (please specify) 74 answered question 805 skipped question 112 5 of 146 6. Rating from Least Important to Very Important, how important are the following economic development and workforce training objectives to you? Least Somewhat Very Rating Rating Neutral Important Important Important Important Average Count 4.3% 37.0% 51.8% Attracting businesses 2.1% (17) 4.8% (38) 4.32 797 (34) (295) (413) 3.4% 31.8% 60.7% Retaining businesses 1.3% (10) 2.8% (22) 4.48 787 (27) (250) (478) Providing job training for interested 10.4% 26.9% 54.5% 3.5% (28) 4.7% (37) 4.24 789 residents (82) (212) (430) Other (please specify) 58 answered question 801 skipped question 116 7. Rating from Least Important to Very Important, how important are the following housing objectives to you? Least Somewhat Very Rating Rating Neutral Important Important Important Important Average Count Promoting affordable workforce 10.1% 34.3% 48.2% 2.3% (18) 5.2% (41) 4.21 791 (middle-income) housing (80) (271) (381) 21.6% 38.4% 27.8% Promoting market rate housing 4.4% (34) 7.8% (61) 3.77 781 (169) (300) (217) Creating more public-assisted (low- 19.9% 13.7% 18.4% 23.0% 25.0% 3.20 783 income) affordable housing (156) (107) (144) (180) (196) Other (please specify) 53 answered question 795 skipped question 122 6 of 146 8. Rating from Least Important to Very Important, how important are the following objectives on environment to you? Least Somewhat Very Rating Rating Neutral Important Important Important Important Average Count Enhancing accessibility to 11.9% 37.1% 40.9% parks/open space in residential 2.3% (18) 7.9% (63) 4.07 800 (95) (297) (327) areas Encouraging energy 9.6% 33.8% 48.8% 3.1% (25) 4.7% (37) 4.21 795 efficient/sustainable buildings (76) (269) (388) 9.5% 25.5% 57.6% Lessening air pollution 2.1% (17) 5.2% (41) 4.31 791 (75) (202) (456) Mitigating the impact of climate 14.7% 30.9% 40.8% 6.7% (53) 6.9% (54) 3.92 787 change and sea level rise (116) (243) (321) 12.6% 31.9% 42.9% Reducing flood risks 5.1% (40) 7.4% (59) 4.00 792 (100) (253) (340) 11.3% 27.8% 52.8% Improving water quality 3.7% (29) 4.4% (34) 4.22 778 (88) (216) (411) Other (please specify) 41 answered question 802 skipped question 115 7 of 146 9. Rating from Least Important to Very Important, how important are the following transportation objectives to you? Least Somewhat Very Rating Rating Neutral Important Important Important Important Average Count 8.0% 33.6% 50.6% Improving traffic safety 1.4% (11) 6.4% (51) 4.26 798 (64) (268) (404) 19.9% 29.3% 36.8% Reducing traffic speed 7.4% (59) 6.6% (52) 3.81 793 (158) (232) (292) Expanding public transportation 11.2% 29.5% 50.6% 2.2% (17) 6.6% (52) 4.20 787 opportunities (88) (232) (398) Promoting pedestrian and bike 14.8% 26.4% 47.3% 5.3% (42) 6.2% (49) 4.04 795 connectivity across the city (118) (210) (376) Converting one-way to two-way 24.7% 30.5% 17.8% 16.3% 10.8% (86) 2.90 799 streets (197) (244) (142) (130) Improving connectivity among 11.4% 28.4% 28.5% 19.6% existing parks (such as West River 12.0% (95) 3.33 789 (90) (224) (225) (155) to West Rock to Beaver Ponds) Other (please specify) 67 answered question 807 skipped question 110 8 of 146 10. Rating from Least Important to Very Important, how important are the following objectives on community facilities and services to you? Least Somewhat Very Rating Rating Neutral Important Important Important Important Average Count Partnering with existing community 13.0% 34.3% 41.4% 4.8% (38) 6.5% (52) 4.01 797 facilities for youth activities (104) (273) (330) Creating more youth programs and 13.7% 30.5% 42.8% 6.4% (51) 6.5% (52) 3.97 796 facilities (109) (243) (341) Building a community center in my 19.0% 25.0% 16.1% 29.2% 10.8% (85) 3.26 789 neighborhood (150) (197) (127) (230) Other (please specify) 45 answered question 801 skipped question 116 11. Do you think the City's land use (zoning) regulations have been effective in protecting the character of your neighborhood? Response Response Percent Count Yes 20.7% 166 No 24.1% 193 Somewhat Agree 26.1% 209 Not Sure 29.1% 233 answered question 801 skipped question 116 9 of 146 12. Do you think the land use (zoning)regulations are adequately enforced in your neighborhood? Response Response Percent Count Yes 22.9% 183 No 24.5% 196 Somewhat Agree 17.1% 137 Not Sure 35.5% 284 answered question 800 skipped question 117 13. Housing costs include either a combination of principal, interest and insurance payments, and taxes for owner-occupied housing; or rent and utilities payments for renter- occupied housing. Do you spend more than 30 percent or one third of your annual household income on housing costs? (Check one of the following) Response Response Percent Count Yes 54.8% 427 No 35.3% 275 I don't know 9.9% 77 answered question 779 skipped question 138 10 of 146 14. Do you live in city, state, or federally subsidized public housing? Response Response Percent Count Yes 14.4% 112 No 85.6% 668 answered question 780 skipped question 137 15. From Least Important to Most Important, rate how important it is to you that the city provides or encourages the following housing types: 2 1 Least 4 5 Very Rating Somewhat 3 Neutral Important Important Important Count Important Publicly subsidized, affordable 16.6% (127) 12.9% (99) 15.8% (121) 28.2% (216) 26.4% (202) 765 rental or for-sale housing Market rate housing 5.2% (40) 9.4% (72) 23.3% (178) 37.5% (286) 24.5% (187) 763 High density housing such as 14.9% (114) 11.3% (86) 25.4% (194) 30.3% (231) 18.1% (138) 763 apartments and condominiums Mix of housing types (single- 5.7% (44) 8.0% (61) 17.1% (131) 39.8% (305) 29.5% (226) 767 family, duplex, townhomes) Quality non-subsidized home 2.9% (22) 7.0% (54) 17.7% (136) 40.5% (311) 31.9% (245) 768 ownership or rental Mixed use housing (housing with 10.2% (78) 9.0% (69) 27.3% (209) 28.2% (216) 25.2% (193) 765 commercial or retail) Senior housing (65 years and over) 4.8% (37) 8.2% (63) 23.5% (181) 30.7% (236) 32.8% (252) 769 answered question 779 skipped question 138 11 of 146 16.
Recommended publications
  • Apartment Buildings in New Haven, 1890-1930

    Apartment Buildings in New Haven, 1890-1930

    The Creation of Urban Homes: Apartment Buildings in New Haven, 1890-1930 Emily Liu For Professor Robert Ellickson Urban Legal History Fall 2006 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Defining and finding apartments ............................................................................................ 4 A. Terminology: “Apartments” ............................................................................................... 4 B. Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 9 III. Demand ............................................................................................................................. 11 A. Population: rise and fall .................................................................................................... 11 B. Small-scale alternatives to apartments .............................................................................. 14 C. Low-end alternatives to apartments: tenements ................................................................ 17 D. Student demand: the effect of Yale ................................................................................... 18 E. Streetcars ........................................................................................................................... 21 IV. Cultural acceptance and resistance ..................................................................................
  • Contract Summary

    Contract Summary

    I-95 NEW HAVEN HARBOR CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Haven, East Haven, Branford, CT TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2012 VERSION 3.0 Prepared For: Connecticut Department of Transportation 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, Connecticut 06131-7546 Submitted by: Parsons Brinckerhoff 148 Eastern Boulevard, Suite 200 Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 I-95 New Haven Harbor Crossing Corridor Transportation Management Plan Improvement Program Version 3.0 Branford, East Haven, New Haven November 2012 Table of Contents Section Page • Letter of Endorsement 3 • Preface 4 • TMP Distribution 6 • Revision History / Change Management Process 10 • List of Acronyms 13 • Executive Summary 14 • TMP Roles and Responsibilities 17 • Program Project Descriptions 21 • Existing and Future Conditions 27 • Work Zone Impact Assessment 30 • Work Zone Impacts Management Strategies 34 − Temporary Traffic Control 34 − Transportation Operations 38 − Public Information / Public Outreach 40 • Monitoring 45 • Implementation Costs 51 • Appendix 1 I-95 New Haven Harbor Crossing Corridor Transportation Management Plan Improvement Program Version 3.0 Branford, East Haven, New Haven November 2012 Reference Documents Note: PDF files of the Reference Documents are included on the attached disk. • Accident Reports & Tables • Contract Plans and Special Provisions (See the Appendix for Lists) − Contract B − Contract E − Reconstruction of I-95 NB in the Long Wharf Area − Reconstruction of Waterfront Street − Route 34 East Downtown Crossing − Reconstruction of I-95 Over
  • GREATER NEW HAVEN Community Index 2016

    GREATER NEW HAVEN Community Index 2016

    GREATER NEW HAVEN Community Index 2016 Understanding Well-Being, Economic Opportunity, and Change in Greater New Haven Neighborhoods A CORE PROGRAM OF In collaboration with The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven and other community partners and a Community Health Needs Assessment for the towns served by Yale-New Haven Hospital and Milford Hospital. Greater New Haven Community Index 2016 Understanding well-being, economic opportunity, and change in Greater New Haven neighborhoods MAJOR FUNDERS Other Funders The Greater New Haven Community Index makes extensive use of the 2015 DataHaven Community Wellbeing Survey, which completed in-depth interviews with 16,219 randomly-selected adults in Connecticut last year. In addition to the major funders listed above, supporters of the survey’s interviews with 1,810 adults in Greater New Haven as well as related data dissemination activities included the City of New Haven Health Department, United Way of Greater New Haven, Workforce Alliance, NewAlliance Foundation, Yale Medical Group, Connecticut Health Foundation, Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, and the Community Alliance for Research and Engagement at the Yale School of Public Health among others. Please see ctdatahaven.org for a complete list of statewide partners and funders. Lead Authors Mark Abraham, Executive Director, DataHaven Mary Buchanan, Project Manager, DataHaven Co-authors and contributors Ari Anisfeld, Aparna Nathan, Camille Seaberry, and Emma Zehner, DataHaven Amanda Durante and Fawatih Mohamed, University of Connecticut
  • 8-Ii-?7 Documentation

    8-Ii-?7 Documentation

    NPS Fonn 10-900-i OH a Vo . I 12 4 -10 I a United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form Continuation sheet _____________________ item number ______________ Page SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD Reference Number: 84001135______ Date Listed: 5/3/84 Ninth Square Historic District New Haven CT Property Name County————————State" This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, if any, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination8-ii-?7 documentation. jo/Signature of the Keeper Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Section #7 Inventory 240-236-10 770 Chapel Street In light of the recent rehabilitation work undertaken, this property's historic facade has been uncovered and is relatively intact. The c.1970 non-historic facade concealed two historic properties, located at 770-774 Chapel Street and 776-780 Chapel Street, both of which are now considered as contributing to the district's documented commercial architectural development from 1820 to c.1940. The 1920s buildings represent the Chicago Commercial Style and were constructed as New Haven's first "fireproof" structures. Page 7/3 of the National Register documentation is now revised to reflect this change as recommended by the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Mid-Atlantic Regional Office, NPS. Reference: See MARO memorandum, Part I applications, and State Review sheets. Note: The historic district is inadvertently misnamed by the State on the review sheets as the Chapel Street Historic District, they should read the Ninth Square Historic District.
  • Street Sweeping

    Street Sweeping

    A A A Low Graphics Sitemap (/sitemap.htm) Select Language Powered by Maps (/gov/maps.htm) Emergency Info (/gov/depts/emergency_info/default.htm) Forms (/cityservices/forms.htm) (/default.htm) Street Sweeping Street Sweeping Season 2021 NEW >>Street Sweeping Calendar April- November 2021 (https://www.newhavenct.gov/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?t=36105.04&BlobID=39514) Click here to see if your street/address was changed. (https://newhavenct.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html? id=1860b2be72814e1faeb12d59560907db) The annual program is designed to remove the heavy accumulation of salt, sand, litter and leaves that has collected over the winter months and to help keep New Haven’s 226 miles of streets clean. Department of Public Works annual street sweeping program operates April 1 – November 30 The annual program is designed to remove the heavy accumulation of salt, sand, litter and leaves that has collected over the winter months as well as help keep New Haven’s miles of streets clean. There are 14 Street Sweeping Routes in the City. Several of the Routes have had streets added or subtracted in this 2021 season ensuring productive and efficient citywide sweeping. Routes that have been impacted* are starred below: ROUTE # Neighborhoods Frequency - Monthly 1 Amity/West Rock First Monday & Wednesday 2 Beaver Hills Third Monday & Tuesday 3 * Newhallville/Prospect First Tuesday & Wednesday 4 * East Rock Second Monday & Tuesday 5* Cedar Hill/ Fair Haven Second Thursday & Friday 6 Fair Haven Heights/Foxon Third & Fourth Friday 7 Fair Haven
  • Quinnipiac Ridge

    Quinnipiac Ridge

    'REEN-AP&RONT FINAL 0$&PDF0- A B C D E F G H I J %#/./-)#¬$%6%,/0-%.4 0ARK¬3TATION 5¬1UINNIPIAC¬2IDGE¬.ATURE¬0RESERVE¬;*= :¬#ASA¬,INDA ¬(ILL¬;&=¬ 0LACE¬TO¬GET¬INFORMATION¬ABOUT¬PARKS ¬PROGRAMS ¬LOCAL¬FLORA¬AND¬FAUNA ¬AND¬TOURS /N¬1UINNIPIAC¬!VE¬NORTH¬OF¬2TE¬ ¬ENTRANCE¬IS¬BETWEEN¬¬AND¬¬ ¬3YLVAN¬!VE¬ 1UINNIPIAC¬!VE :¬#ASA¬/NTONAL ¬(ILL¬;&=¬ &ARMERS¬-ARKET ,¬%DGEWOOD¬2ANGER¬3TATION¬;&= ¬3YLVAN¬!VE¬ 3ELL¬REGIONALLY¬AND¬ORGANICALLY¬GROWN¬PRODUCE¬3OME¬ALSO¬SELL¬FLOWERS ¬HAND¬ ,OCATED¬INSIDE¬%DGEWOOD¬0ARK¬NEAR¬THE¬CORNER¬OF¬%DGEWOOD¬!VE¬AND¬%LLA¬ 5¬(EMINGWAY¬#REEK¬.ATURE¬0RESERVE¬;*= :¬#EDAR¬(ILL¬!PARTMENTS ¬%AST¬2OCK¬;)=¬ CRAFTED¬ITEMS ¬BAKED¬GOODS ¬WINE ¬WOOL ¬EVEN¬REGIONAL¬COOKBOOKS¬3MALL¬FAMILY¬ 4¬'RASSO¬"LVD ¬THE¬2ANGER¬3TATION¬HOLDS¬A¬GREAT¬COLLECTION¬OF¬LOCAL¬ /N¬EAST¬SIDE¬OF¬1UINNIPIAC¬!VE¬IMMEDIATELY¬NORTH¬OF¬RAILROAD¬UNDERPASS ¬3TATE¬3T FARMS¬ARE¬KEPT¬GOING¬AND¬THE¬COUNTRYSIDE¬REMAINS¬GREEN¬ r AMPHIBIANS¬AND¬REPTILES¬ :¬#HAPELSEED ¬$WIGHT¬¬7EST¬2IVER¬;&=¬ D e p 5¬-ORRIS¬#REEK¬.ATURE¬0RESERVE¬;)= ¬#HAPEL¬3T B r r o UG o h !¬¬#ITY¬&ARMERSg¬-ARKET¬7OOSTER¬3QUARE¬;(= o 1 d 1 ,¬,IGHTHOUSE¬0OINT¬0ARK¬2ANGER¬3TATION¬;(= /N¬-EADOW¬6IEW¬3T¬NEAR¬,IGHTHOUSE¬0OINT :¬#ONSTANCE¬"AKER¬-OTLEY ¬.EWHALLVILLE¬;'= T R k s (',7,21 t 2USSO¬0ARK ¬CORNER¬OF¬#HAPEL¬AND¬$E0ALMA¬/PEN¬3ATURDAYS¬FROM¬ i Z4 d ¬,IGHTHOUSE¬2D¬4OUCH¬TANK¬AND¬COASTAL¬ECOLOGY¬PROGRAMS¬4OURS¬OF¬THE¬ ¬3HERMAN¬!VE¬ o e m AM PM ¬-AY¬THROUGH¬$ECEMBER¬¬7)#¬¬FOOD¬STAMPS¬ACCEPTED l LIGHTHOUSE ¬&ORT¬.ATHAN¬(ALE ¬AND¬THE¬CAROUSEL¬AVAILABLE¬ :¬#RAWFORD¬-ANOR ¬$WIGHT¬;'=¬ i 3TAR GAZING¬3ITE
  • Closing Doors, Closing Minds College Set to Host Neighbors-In-Need

    Closing Doors, Closing Minds College Set to Host Neighbors-In-Need

    Monday December 10, 2012 [email protected] Gateway Community College Vol. IV Issue II Winter 2012 College Set to Host Neighbors-in-Need Holiday Dinner By Bonnie Fahy, Co-editor At this festive event, there also will be an activ- ity room with face painting. The college will also have Santa and Mrs. Claus there to hand out toys to all the children. The kids can have their photo taken for a keepsake. Every guest will receive a winter coat and the adults will receive a bag full of personal care items Dattco Bus Company is donating the buses and the services of their drivers. The college does as much as possible to make this a joyful and cheerful experience for all, at the same time plus protecting the participants’ safety and privacy. Dr. Kendrick and those involved feel the need and de- sire to become involved with our downtown neigh- bors. We will be working with Market New Haven and the Town Green Committee to get the word out about the event to help us with coats, toys and $10 gift cards for our teen attendees. An event like this takes a massive amount of fundraising and donations; the college would like to thank Chabaso Bakery for donating rolls and Elm City Market for donating trays of Mac and Cheese. If someone would like to make a contribution, he/ Today many people through no fault of their own she can send or bring a check payable to Gateway have fallen on difficult times and have to live in tem- Foundation marked “Holiday Dinner”; 100% of the porary housing or a shelter.
  • October 2016 SCRCOG Board Agenda

    October 2016 SCRCOG Board Agenda

    SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bethany Branford East Haven Guilford Hamden Madison Meriden Milford New Haven North Branford North Haven Orange Wallingford West Haven Woodbridge Carl J. Amento, Executive Director SCRCOG MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA October 26, 2016 – 10:00 A.M. Location: 127 Washington Avenue, 4th Floor West North Haven, CT 06473 Full agenda materials can be found at our website – www.scrcog.org 1. Call to Order and Introductions – Mayor Benjamin Blake, Chairman 2. Presentation: CCM’s State‐Local Partnership Panel Initiative‐Joseph DeLong, President, Conference of CT Municipalities 3. Presentation: New Partnership Products to Improve Local Economies without Political Acrimony, Charles Patton, Senior Policy Analyst, Partnership for Strong Communities 4. Adoption of 9/28/16 SCRCOG Minutes – First Selectman Joseph Mazza, Secretary Pages 2-4 5. Treasurer’s Report for month ending 9/30/16 – First Selectman James Cosgrove, Treasurer Pages 5,6 6. Transportation Committee Report – Mayor William Dickinson, Chairman Pages 7-18 a. Adopt Resolution to approve 2015-2018 TIP Amendment Nineteen Pages 13, 14 b. Ozone Air Quality Conformity Resolution Pages 15, 16 c. PM 2.5 Air Quality Conformity Resolution Pages 17, 18 7. Appointment of Rebecca Andreucci as SCRCOG Representative to CT Resource & Development Page 19 Area Inc. Council 8. Congressional Reports – Louis Mangini, Aide to U.S. Representative Rosa DeLauro; Evan Johnson, Aide to Senator Christopher Murphy; Ellen Graham, Aide to Senator Richard Blumenthal 9. State Legislative Report – Michael Muszynski, Advocacy Manager, CCM 10. SCRCOG Executive Director’s Report – Carl Amento, Executive Director 11. Grant Opportunities and Upcoming Events – Carl Amento, Executive Director Pages 20-29 12.
  • Chapter V: Transportation

    Chapter V: Transportation

    Transportation CHAPTER V: TRANSPORTATION A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Located at the junction of Interstate 91 and Interstate 95, as well as a key access point to the Northeast Corridor rail line, New Haven is the highway and rail gateway to New England. It is the largest seaport in the state and the region and also the first city in Connecticut to have joined the national complete streets movement in 2008 by adopting the City’s Complete Streets Design Manual, balancing the needs of all roadway users including pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Journey to Work Data For a U.S. city of its size, New Haven has substantial share (45 Aerial view of New Haven seaport: largest in the state and the region. percent) of commuters who use a form of transportation other than driving alone. Approximately 15 percent of all commuters travel via carpool, close to 14 percent walk to work, while over 11 percent use a form of public transportation. Of the 10 largest cities in New England, only Boston has a higher percentage of residents who travel to work via non-motorized transportation. Also, out of this same group of cities, New Haven ranked highest in the percentage of people who walked to work. New Haven Vision 2025 V-1 Transportation Vehicular Circulation There are 255 miles of roadway in the city, ranging from Interstate highways to purely local residential streets. Of these roadways, 88 percent are locally-maintained public roads and 12 percent are state-maintained roads and highways. There are 43 locally- maintained bridges in the city.
  • Report Appendices.Pdf

    Report Appendices.Pdf

    APPENDIX A Appendix A Sampling Methodology for DataHaven 2015 Survey Respondents are contacted via landline or cell phone. The design of the landline sample is conducted so as to ensure the selection of both listed and unlisted telephone numbers, using random digit dialing (RDD). The cell phone sample is drawn from a sample of dedicated wireless telephone exchanges from within Connecticut and the specified zip codes within New York State. Respondents are screened for residence in the state of Connecticut or one of the seven zip codes in New York. The primary supplier of the RDD landline and cell phone samples is Survey Sampling International (SSI) of Shelton, Connecticut, “the premier global provider of sampling solutions for survey research1”. From the SSI Fact Sheet on Radom Digit Samples (for landline telephone samples): Most SSI samples are generated using a database of “working blocks.” A block (also known as a 100-bank or a bank) is a set of 100 contiguous numbers identified by the first two digits of the last four digits of a telephone number. For example, in the telephone number 255-4200, “42” is the block. A block is termed to be working if one or more listed telephone numbers are found in that block. The sample composition is comprised of random numbers distributed across all eligible blocks in proportion to their density of listed telephone households. All blocks within a county are organized in ascending order by area code, exchange, and block number. Once the quota has been allocated to all counties in the frame, a sampling interval is calculated by summing the number of listed residential numbers in each eligible block within the county and dividing that sum by the number of sampling points assigned to the county.
  • Urbanism and Its End

    Urbanism and Its End

    THE INSTITUTION FOR SOCIAL AND POLICY STUDIES AT YALE UNIVERSITY THE YALE ISPS SERIES DOUGLAS W. RAE CITYURBANISM AND ITS END YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS • NEW HAVEN AND LONDON Frontispiece: Construction workers posing for an on-the-job portrait during urban renewal’s Church Street Project, c. 1963. NHCHS. Copyright © 2003 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Unless otherwise specifically noted, all photographs are by permission of the New Haven Colony Historical Society (NHCHS). All rights reserved. Designed by Nancy Ovedovitz and set in Scala type by The Composing Room of Michigan, Inc. Printed in the United States of America by R. R. Donnelley, Harrisonburg, Virginia. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rae, Douglas W. City : urbanism and its end / Douglas W. Rae. p. cm. — (Yale ISPS series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-300-09577-5 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. New Haven (Conn.)—Politics and government—20th century. 2. New Haven (Conn.)—Economic conditions—20th century. 3. New Haven (Conn.)—Social conditions—20th century. 4. City and town life—Connecticut—New Haven—History—20th century. 5. Industrialization—Social aspects—Connecticut—New Haven— History—20th century. 6. Urban renewal—Connecticut—New Haven—History—20th century. I. Title. II. Series. F104.N657R34 2003 974.6؅8043—dc21 2003009974 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
  • No Place to Park: the Uneasy Relationship Between a City and Its Cars

    No Place to Park: the Uneasy Relationship Between a City and Its Cars

    No Place To Park: The Uneasy Relationship Between a City and its Cars YiLing Chen-Josephson May 11, 2007 Submitted to Professor Robert Ellickson Yale Law School 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS: WHAT THEY ARE AND WHERE THEY CAME FROM ............................................................................................. 8 A. New Haven’s Off-Street Parking Requirements ................................................................................. 11 1. Pre-1963............................................................................................................................................... 11 2. Post-1963 ............................................................................................................................................. 12 II. THE PROBLEM WITH OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS ............. 15 A. A Fertility Drug for Cars ...................................................................................................................... 15 B. Effects on the Housing Market: A Form of Exclusionary Zoning ..................................................... 18 C. Preventing Adaptive Reuse ................................................................................................................... 20 D. Miscalculations ...................................................................................................................................... 22 III. “THE NEEDS AND ASPIRATION OF THE CITY”: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE PARKING PROVISIONS OF NEW HAVEN’S ZONING ORDINANCE