Highways Capital Projects 2019-2020 Paving Arterials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highways Capital Projects 2019-2020 Paving Arterials HIGHWAYS CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 PAVING ARTERIALS (Route 1 – Route 99) DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Route 3, DeWolfe Road Area to Cranberry Lake Bridge (C824) Area 3.0 Route 3, Route 4 to Thomas Brook (T245) Area 7.1 Route 7, Broad Road to Brizley Brook No. 2 (B726) 3.4 Route 7, Route 102 Area to Milligan Brook No. 2 (M452) Area 4.1 Route 8, 2018 Contract towards Route 8/ Route160 Interchange Area 3.8 Route 10, Little River Bridge No. 1 (L555) Area to Route 670 Area 2.6 Route 11, Beach Street to Upper Foran Road 1.2 Route 11, Gum Road to Beach Street 2.8 Route 11, Route 134 Area to St. Pierre Road Overpass (S761) Area 2.4 Route 15, Route 2 Underpass (R555) to Painsec Junction CNR Overpass (P050) - 1.2 Eastbound Route 15, Route 11/ Route 132 Area to Route 933 Area 9.8 Route 15, Route 950 Interchange Area towards Saint-André Road Overpass 2.5 (S009) Route 17, de l’Aéroport Road to Saint-Léonard Town Limit 2.4 Page 1 of 8 HIGHWAYS CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 PAVING COLLECTORS (Route 100 – Route 199) DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Route 101, Branch Road to Airport Road Area 2.0 Route 102, Doe’s Lane to Morrisdale Beach Road 2.4 Route 105, Keswick River No. 1 (K265) to Route 616 3.7 Route 108, Bryenton Area towards Parker Road 1.9 Route 109, Route 2 Area to St. John River Bridge (A465) 1.5 Route 117, Little Black River Bridge (L330) to South Black River Road 4.9 Route 144, Rue Principale (Madawaska Maliseet First Nation) 1.8 Route 190, Gamblin Road to Route 2 Area 3.4 Page 2 of 8 HIGHWAYS CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 PAVING – LOCALS (Route 200 – Route 999 and Named Roads) DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Gorge Road, Moncton City Limit towards Crossman Hills Road 1.2 Pine Glen Road, Riverview Town Limit to Niagara Road 3.5 Route 313, Barachois Road to Portage Road Area 4.4 Route 350, Lavigne Road towards Sutherland Lane 3.1 Route 385, Two Brooks Road Area to Max Blue Road * 2.9 Route 555, Route 2 Underpass (H665) to Bull Road 1.0 Route 590, Estey Road Area towards Hydroline 3.6 Route 785, Entrance to Irving Mill to Alex Jack Detour Road 2.8 ∗ Converting asphalt to chipseal Page 3 of 8 HIGHWAYS CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 GRADING DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Darlings Island Road – Upgrading 1.0 Route 1, Route 100 (Rothesay Road) Intersection - Route 105, Currie Mountain towards Route 104 (Carryover) 2.8 Route 105, Medford Area – Slope Repair 0.3 Route 275, Val d'Amour Road Intersection - Route 560, River de Chute Area – Realignment 0.5 Route 885, Route 890 Intersection (Carryover) - Page 4 of 8 HIGHWAYS CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 LARGE CULVERTS DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Apple Brook (AK06), Route 114 - Baker Brook (B058), Route 101 - Bastarache Brook No. 1 (B176), Kay Road (Carryover) - Carters Brook North (WS21), Route 935 (Carryover) - Gaspereau Creek No. 1 (G132), Route 116 - Gulquac River (G680), Route 108 (Carryover) - McMorris Brook No. 2 (WB18), Route 15 - Red Head Road Culvert No. 2 (SU13) - Route 7, Culvert No. 1 (LX08) - Route 7, Culvert No. 16 (SS07), City of Saint John - Route 101 Culvert No. 3 (TB06) - Route 102 Culvert No. 28 (YE03) - Route 130 Culvert No. 19 (VA07) - Sullivan Creek No. 1 (S883), Temple Road - West St. Nicholas No. 3 (W435) - Page 5 of 8 BRIDGES CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 BRIDGES DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Craig Brook (C816), Route 107 - East Iroquois River No. 1 (E080), Iroquois Road – Rehabilitation - Eel River No. 1 (E340), Route 134 – Pier Rehabilitation - Florenceville Bridge (F470), Route 130 – Phase 2 Rehabilitation (Carryover) - Grant Brook No. 1 (G495), Route 124 (Multi-Year) - Indian Brook No. 2 (H767), Route 105 - Kennebecasis River No. 24 (K200), Route 114 – Phase 1 (Detour) - Keyhole (K315), Route 690 - Little Buctouche River No. 1 (L345) – Phase 2, Route 134 (Carryover) - Little River No. 3 (L550), Hickey Road (City of Saint John) - Miller Brook No. 1 (M446), Cape Road - Mill Lake Outlet (M429), Route 785 – Phase 2 - Nackawic River No. 1 (N005), Route 105 (Town of Nackawic) – Rehabilitation - (Multi-Year) Nash Creek No. 1 (N070), Route 134 (Multi-Year) - Parker (P095), Route 7 - Penniac Stream No. 5 (P270), Penniac Road (Carryover) - Pollett River No. 10 (P675), Route 114 (Multi-Year) - Porcupine Brook (P700), Route 645 – Phase 1 (Detour) - Rabbit Brook No. 1 (R003), Route 15 (Wheeler Boulevard) (Carryover) - Reversing Falls Bridge (R215), Route 100 – East Abutment Stabilization - Tobique River Bridge No. 4 (T400), Route 108/ Route 390 – Rehabilitation - (Carryover) Tobique River Bridge No. 5 (T405), Riley Brook – Rehabilitation (Carryover) - Wheeler Boulevard Pedestrian Tunnel (W507), Route 15 - Page 6 of 8 HIGHWAYS CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 MAJOR PROJECT AREAS DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Route 2, Mapleton Road Interchange Modifications - Route 108, Merritt Brook to Route 395 – Grading & Paving (Carryover) 2.6 Page 7 of 8 FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL COST-SHARED PROJECTS CAPITAL PROJECTS 2019-2020 PROJECTS DESCRIPTION LENGTH (km) Fundy Trail Connector Dark Hollow Road Area to Route 114 – Grading (Carryover) 8.5 Fundy Trail Parkway to Grassy Lake Area – Grading (Carryover) 9.0 Grassy Lake Area to Creek Road and Tait Brook (T025) – Grading (Multi-Year) 2.6 Point Wolfe Bridge (P540) (Carryover) - Petitcodiac – Bridge & Channel Construction Petitcodiac River Bridge No. 1.5 – Deck (Multi-Year) - Petitcodiac River Bridge No. 1.5 – Superstructure (Carryover) - Route 8, Anderson Bridge (Northwest Miramichi No. 1, N665) Foundations & Steel Superstructure (Multi-Year) - Routes 8 & 11, Centennial Bridge (Miramichi River Bridge No. 1, C244) Installation of Utility Ducts - Phase 4 Rehabilitation (Multi-Year) - Route 10, Coles Island Structures Detour Construction - Route 11, Route 15 to Shediac River Route 15/ Route 132 Interchange Modifications – Grading, Paving, Signing and - Lighting (Carryover) Route 11, Shediac River to Cocagne River Shediac River Bridge No. 1.5 West (S281) (Multi-Year) - Viaduc Road Interchange & Underpass (B006) (Carryover) - Route 11, Cocagne River to Little Bouctouche River Chemin Cormier Cross Area to Ward Road Area – Grading (Carryover) - Cocagne Sud Interchange Area – Grading, Paving, Signing and Lighting - (Carryover) Page 8 of 8 .
Recommended publications
  • Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920
    Flood Frequency Analyses for New Brunswick Rivers Aucoin, F., D. Caissie, N. El-Jabi and N. Turkkan Department of Fisheries and Oceans Gulf Region Oceans and Science Branch Diadromous Fish Section P.O. Box 5030, Moncton, NB, E1C 9B6 2011 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2920 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925. Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la publication dans un journal scientifique.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Your Frontispiece Or Quote Page Here (If Any)
    A LATE MARITIME WOODLAND PESKOTOMUHKATI FISHERY FROM THE MAINLAND QUODDY REGION, SOUTHWESTERN NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA by W. Jesse Webb B.A. (Hons.), Anthropology, 2009 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Academic Unit of Anthropology Supervisors: Susan E. Blair, Ph.D, Anthropology, Chair Matthew W. Betts, Ph.D, Anthropology Examining Board: Darcy J. Dignam, M.A., Anthropology Richard A. Cunjak, Ph.D., Biology This thesis is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK April 2018 © William Jesse Webb, 2018 ABSTRACT The nature of precontact Indigenous fisheries and their significance to subsistence economies, seasonal mobility, and diachronic cultural change remain underdeveloped in the archaeology of the Maritime Peninsula, northeastern North America. This thesis presents an analysis of a precontact fishery from BgDs-15, a small shell-bearing site located on the northern mainland of Passamaquoddy Bay, southwestern New Brunswick, Canada. Several hundred bones recovered during the 2004 field excavations and over 3,000 fish remains from midden column and bulk feature samples were examined. Most of these fish bones are attributable to Atlantic tomcod (Microgadus tomcod Walbaum, 1792) and unidentified, tomcod-sized gadids, with some herring (Clupeidae) present. Multiple lines of complementary evidence, including taxonomic composition, relative abundances, skeletal element frequency, seasonality, and the ethnohistoric record were examined to produce a high-resolution analysis of the BgDs-15 fishery and provide insight into ancestral Peskotomuhkati settlement-subsistence strategies during the Late Maritime Woodland period (ca. 1350–550 BP). ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The process of developing this thesis has, on the one hand, been the ideal of curiosity-driven academic research and, on the other, a Sisyphean personal struggle.
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Hills Wind Project Mi'kmaq Ecological Knowledge Study
    East Bay Hills Wind Project Mi’kmaq Ecological Knowledge Study Prepared for: Cape Breton Hydro Inc. December 2012 – Version 1 M.E.K.S. Project Team Jason Googoo, Project Manager Dave Moore, Author and Research Craig Hodder, Author and GIS Technician Mary Ellen Googoo, MEKS Interviewer John Sylliboy, MEKS Traditionalist Prepared by: Reviewed by: ___________________ ____________________ Craig Hodder, Author Jason Googoo, Manager Executive Summary This Mi’kmaq Ecological Knowledge Study, also commonly referred to as an MEKS or a Traditional Ecological Knowledge Study (TEKS), was developed by Membertou Geomatics Solutions (MGS) on behalf of Cape Breton Hydro Inc. (CBHI) for the proposed East Bay Hills Wind Power Project. This MEKS mandate is to consider land and water areas which the proposed project will utilize, and to identify what Mi’kmaq traditional use activities have occurred, or are currently occurring within, and what Mi’kmaq ecological knowledge presently exists in regards to the area. In order to ensure accountability and ethic responsibility of this MEKS, the MEKS development has adhered to the “Mi’kmaq Ecological Knowledge Protocol”. This protocol is a document that has been established by the Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi’kmaq Chiefs, which speaks to the process, procedures and results that are expected of a MEKS. The Mi’kmaq Ecological Knowledge Study consisted of two major components: • Mi’kmaq Traditional Land and Resource Use Activities , both past and present, • A Mi’kmaq Significance Species Analysis , considering the resources that are important to Mi’kmaq use. The Mi’kmaq Traditional Land and Resource Use Activities component utilized interviews as the key source of information regarding Mi’kmaq use in the Project Site and Study Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Brooks Improving Acccess to Aquatic Habitat Through Diverse Partnership
    2019–2020 BROKEN BROOKS IMPROVING ACCCESS TO AQUATIC HABITAT THROUGH DIVERSE PARTNERSHIP Prepared by Shane Boyd PETITCODIAC WATERSHED ALLIANCE 0 This page was intentionally left blank. i DISCLAIMER The Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance (PWA) is a non-profit environmental charity who works to protect and improve the ecological systems within the Petitcodiac River Watershed. We use local science to educate community members within the watershed about the ecology within the Petitcodiac River’s watershed boundary, and the importance of protecting this unique river system. Photographic Credits Unless otherwise indicated, photographs, charts, and maps in this publication are courtesy of the Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance. All other photograph or map credits appear following the image caption. General Disclaimer While every effort has been made to present accurate maps and data, the Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance does not guarantee that the maps and data are correct. Users of facts presented in this report, as well as the data herein must take care to ensure that applications envisaged for these data are appropriate uses. The opinions expressed in this document are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the employees and board members of the organisation, or of the Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance. The Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance 236 St. George St., Suite 405 Moncton, NB E1C 1W1 (506) 384-3369 ii We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Atlantic Salmon Conservation Foundation, New Brunswick’s Environmental Trust Fund, Government of Canada’s Recreational Fisheries Conservation Partnerships Program, New Brunswick’s Student Employment Experience Development and Government of Canada Summer Jobs. iii Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Septembre 2016 Utilisation Du Guide Des Points
    MARCHANDISES GÉNÉRALES Points de Service Day & Ross Marchandises Générales Septembre 2016 Utilisation du guide des points Les points de parité et le guide des points publiés Tout tarif appliqué à un point associé à un point de parité ou basé sur celui-ci sera le même que le tarif du point de base. Par exemple, Dieppe, au Nouveau-Brunswick, PROV VILLE TERMINAL NOTE 1 NOTE 2 POINT DE BASE dont le terminal de livraison est Moncton (MTN), est associé à Moncton, au Nouveau-Brunswick. NB DIEPPE MTN MONCTON Par conséquent, tous les taux et frais de la grille tarifaire s’appliquant à Moncton, s’appliqueront également à Dieppe. Changements et exceptions Cette application ne peut pas être utilisée lorsque le tarif est publié pour un point autre qu’un point de parité tel que Dieppe. Par conséquent, le point précisé dans le tarif du client aura préséance, que Moncton soit également publié dans ce tarif ou non. Les tarifs des points ultérieurs de Corner Brook à Labrador sont saisonniers. Les tarifs aériens s’appliqueront en hiver si le service est oert, en absence du service de traversier, sinon les expéditions à destination de Labrador ne seront pas acceptées, à moins que le service puisse être assuré par le terminal de Québec. Les tarifs vers certains points du nord-ouest, de Nunavut, du Yukon et du Labrador peuvent changer en hiver et pendant la période de débâcle du printemps à cause des fermetures de route et de l’interruption du service de traversier. Le service aérien sera oert sur demande. Notes La note 1 du guide des points porte sur les jours de service supplémentaires qui pourraient s’avérer nécessaires.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Watersheds 12 Digit Shapefile
    MS Watersheds 12 Digit Shapefile Tags 16-digit, Hydrologic Unit Code, Region, US, 4-digit, HUC, United States, Watershed Boundary Dataset, 2-digit, Basin, 10-digit, Hydrologic Units, Sub-basin, Watershed, WBD, 6-digit, inlandWaters, Sub-region, Subwatershed, 12-digit, 14-digit, 8-digit Summary The intent of defining Hydrologic Units (HU) within the Watershed Boundary Dataset is to establish a base-line drainage boundary framework, accounting for all land and surface areas. Hydrologic units are intended to be used as a tool for water-resource management and planning activities particularly for site-specific and localized studies requiring a level of detail provided by large-scale map information. The WBD complements the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) and supports numerous programmatic missions and activities including: watershed management, rehabilitation and enhancement, aquatic species conservation strategies, flood plain management and flood prevention, water-quality initiatives and programs, dam safety programs, fire assessment and management, resource inventory and assessment, water data analysis and water census. **** NOTE - MARIS Staff created a Mississippi collection from various regions in January 2019 **** Description The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) is a comprehensive aggregated collection of hydrologic unit data consistent with the national criteria for delineation and resolution. It defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point except in coastal or lake front areas where there could be multiple outlets as stated by the "Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD)" “Standard” (http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/). Watershed boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Samuel Miles Jones & Rebecca Crouse
    A Journey Through History – the Ancestry of Rebecca Crouse – Descendant of United Empire Loyalists Rebecca Crouse Dana C. Legassie 5/4/2017 A History of Samuel Miles Jones & Rebecca Crouse According to my research, based upon the information I have been given and tracked down through an on-line records search, I have found the following information concerning the union of Rebecca & Miles Jones. Up to this point, we were unable to find a maiden name for Rebecca. In most of the on-line and available census records, she is listed by her married name of Rebecca Jones. Through my mother and her sisters, we were able to establish a possible surname of CROUSE. Through a lucky hit on an internet genealogy web site, that supposition has been proven as correct. Stepping back a couple of generations the surname appears as CRAUSS in an earlier census (pre-1860) listing for Rebecca’s grandfather. But I digress, and will touch on this further in this essay. A bit of a history lesson is needed at this point for clarification of some dates and locations. Previous to 1784, the Province or British Colony of New Brunswick and the State of Maine did not exist as the area was part of the British Colonies of Nova Scotia and Massachusetts. Only through the American Revolution and an act of the British Parliament in 1784 did this area become the British Colony of New Brunswick and did not become a Province until the Act of Confederation in 1867. Some of the place names have changed or have been amalgamated into other larger nearby communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Feed Grain Transportation and Storage Assistance Regulations
    CANADA CONSOLIDATION CODIFICATION Feed Grain Transportation and Règlement sur l’aide au Storage Assistance Regulations transport et à l’emmagasinage des céréales C.R.C., c. 1027 C.R.C., ch. 1027 Current to November 21, 2016 À jour au 21 novembre 2016 Published by the Minister of Justice at the following address: Publié par le ministre de la Justice à l’adresse suivante : http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca OFFICIAL STATUS CARACTÈRE OFFICIEL OF CONSOLIDATIONS DES CODIFICATIONS Subsections 31(1) and (3) of the Legislation Revision and Les paragraphes 31(1) et (3) de la Loi sur la révision et la Consolidation Act, in force on June 1, 2009, provide as codification des textes législatifs, en vigueur le 1er juin follows: 2009, prévoient ce qui suit : Published consolidation is evidence Codifications comme élément de preuve 31 (1) Every copy of a consolidated statute or consolidated 31 (1) Tout exemplaire d'une loi codifiée ou d'un règlement regulation published by the Minister under this Act in either codifié, publié par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi sur print or electronic form is evidence of that statute or regula- support papier ou sur support électronique, fait foi de cette tion and of its contents and every copy purporting to be pub- loi ou de ce règlement et de son contenu. Tout exemplaire lished by the Minister is deemed to be so published, unless donné comme publié par le ministre est réputé avoir été ainsi the contrary is shown. publié, sauf preuve contraire.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Salmon Southwest New Brunswick Outer Fundy SFA 23
    Fisheries Pêches and Oceans et Océans DFO Science Maritimes Region Stock Status Report D3-13 Atlantic Salmon Southwest New Brunswick outer Fundy SFA 23 Background Atlantic salmon inhabit 7 major rivers of the “outer Fundy” area of southwest New Brunswick. The rivers are bounded by and include the Saint John and St. Croix. Salmon stocks of these rivers are characterized by a maiden MSW (multi-sea- winter; large) component that, unlike inner Fundy stocks, migrates to the Labrador Sea and a 1SW (one-sea-winter; small) component that is known to venture to the south and east coasts of insular Newfoundland. This report summarizes the status of salmon stocks of the Saint John River above The Fishery Mactaquac, the Nashwaak, Kennebecasis and Hammond tributaries below Mactaquac and the Magaguadavic and St. Croix rivers. Within southwest New Brunswick, Aborig- inal peoples, including five First Nations, Stock characteristics vary between outer Fundy rivers, e.g., wild MSW fish comprise about 40% of total wild returns to were allocated 3,795 1SW fish, mostly from above Mactaquac, the Nashwaak and the Magaguadavic stocks returning to Mactaquac. Estimated rivers and 70% of wild returns to the St. Croix River. MSW salmon are 75- 85% female on the Saint John and 60% female harvests were 675 1SW and 285 MSW fish. on the St. Croix and provide most of the egg deposition. Wild In 1995, a fall harvest after a summer-long 1SW salmon are 15% female above Mactaquac, 40% female in the Nashwaak and 50% female in the St. Croix. About 20% closure was estimated at only 75 fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Support for Delineation of Inner Bay of Fundy Salmon Marine Critical Habitat Boundaries in Minas Basin and Chignecto
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Maritimes Region Science Response 2015/035 SUPPORT FOR DELINEATION OF INNER BAY OF FUNDY SALMON MARINE CRITICAL HABITAT BOUNDARIES IN MINAS BASIN AND CHIGNECTO BAY Context In April 2014, the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Species at Risk Management Division (SARMD) in the Maritimes Region requested information from DFO Science to assist with the delineation of boundaries for critical habitat (CH) being considered for Inner Bay of Fundy (IBOF) Atlantic Salmon within Chignecto Bay and Minas Basin, specifically: to assist with the delineation of the boundary between estuarine and marine habitat for several large, tidal estuaries (i.e., Petitcodiac River, Avon River, Salmon River Colchester, Shubenacadie River estuary and Cumberland Basin). DFO Science had previously provided advice on the characteristics and general location of important marine and estuarine habitat for IBOF salmon (DFO 2008; DFO 2013); however, additional information was requested to assist in delineating the precise boundaries of important marine habitat within Chignecto Bay and Minas Basin in order to subsequently propose, describe and map these as CH within an amended Recovery Strategy for IBOF salmon. Once identified in the Recovery Strategy, measures will be taken to protect this marine CH under the Species at Risk Act (SARA). This Science Response Report results from the Science Response Process of 11 July 2014 on Support for Delineation of Inner Bay of Fundy Salmon Marine Critical Habitat Boundaries. Background The inner Bay of Fundy populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) are listed as Endangered under the Species at Risk Act, and SARA requires the identification of CH for endangered species within a Recovery Strategy (or Action Plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Topics Subject Index
    National Society for the Peservation of Covered Bridges Subject Index for "Covered Bridge Topics" Accidents January 1962 Advertisements Winter 1995; Summer 2006 Advertisements inside CBs March 1948; Autumn 1945; Spring 1996 Atlantic Bridge Works Summer 1995 Atlantic Oil October 1969 Chesterfield Cigarettes Winter 1953 Coca-Cola July 1964 Long, Moses Fall 1992 Africa Cameroon Fall 2002 Age Winter 1982; Summer 2011 Akers Studio Photographs Summer 2014; Fall 2014 Alabama April 1960; January 1962; April 1962; July 1962; January 1964; January 1966; October 1970; April 1971; Winter 1997 (Newsletter); Spring 2005 Barbour Co. January 1973 Blount Co. March 1949; April 1960; January 1962; April 1962; July 1962; January 1964; January 1966; October 1970; April 1971; Winter 1997 (Newsletter); Spring 2005 Double Bridges (AL/01-05-02x) Fall 1998; Winter 1999 Hayden or Standridge Bridge (AL/01- April 1968 05-11x) Nectar Bridge (AL/01-05-04x) Summer 1995 Swann Bridge (AL/01-05-05) Spring 1993 Calhoun Co. July 1962; Winter 1997 (Newsletter) Coldwater Bridge (AL/01-08-01) Summer 2017 Mellon's Mill Bridge (AL/01-08-06) Summer 2017 Tallahatchee Bridge (AL/01-08-03) Summer 2017 Colbert Co. July 1962 Buzzard Roost Bridge (AL/01-17-01x) January 1961 Coleman Co. January 1965 Coosa Co. Spring 1981; Spring 2005 Oakachoy Bridge (AL/01-19-01) Summer 1991 Cullman Co. January 1962; April 1962; July 1963; April 1971; Fall 1991; Winter 1997 (Newsletter) Bessada Church Bridge April 1960 Double Bridges (AL/01-22-05x) Fall 1998; Winter 1999 Trimble Bridge (AL/01-22-02) April 1960 Etowah Co. July 1962; April 1964; April 1971; Winter 1997 (Newsletter) Gilliland Bridge (AL/01-28-02) July 1973 Lee Co.
    [Show full text]
  • 15.0 Heritage Resources
    MACTAQUAC PROJECT: FINAL COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CER) REPORT 15.0 HERITAGE RESOURCES Heritage resources are those resources, both human and natural, created by past human activities that remain to inform present and future societies of that past. Heritage resources include archaeological, architectural (built heritage), and palaeontological resources. Archaeological resources are defined as any physical remnants on or below the ground surface which show evidence of manufacture, alteration, or use by humans from the past. These physical remnants include Pre-Contact resources (i.e., the period between the retreat of glaciers in New Brunswick up to European contact in the early 17th Century) and Historic Period resources (i.e., from European contact and settlement to the mid-20th Century). Built heritage resources are human-made standing structures that provide evidence of a person, place, event or human use in the past. Palaeontological resources (i.e., fossils) comprise evidence of past multicellular life, including body fossils (e.g., bones, shells and plant stems), impressions (e.g., leaf imprints), and trace fossils. Palaeontological resources are often thousands of years to hundreds of millions of years old and are often the remains of extinct species. This section discusses the potential interactions of the Options with archaeological resources, built heritage resources, and palaeontological resources. 15.1 SCOPE OF THE REVIEW 15.1.1 Why Heritage Resources is a Valued Component Heritage resources is a VC because of the: interest and concerns regarding these resources from the general public as a whole; and interest of First Nations in the preservation and management of heritage resources related to their history and culture.
    [Show full text]