<<

Geography 470: and eory of Spring 2015

Geography 470: History and Theory of Geography

Spring 2015. Tues. and Thurs. 5:00–6:20. Lucy Stone Hall, Room B-267 Instructor: Mazen Labban Office: B-248, Lucy Stone Hall E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: By appointment (email me at least one day in advance)

Course Description

History and Theory of Geography is an advanced undergraduate course designed for students majoring in geography and other students with a strong interest in geography. The course is a critical inquiry into the historical and philosophical development of modern geographical thought and the academic discipline of geography. It examines the development of modern geography from its early beginnings with the expansion of European exploration and colonialism in the fifteenth century, focusing on key themes, debates and controversies that have shaped the academic discipline throughout its development, particularly in the second half of the twentieth century, up to the present. We look at the development of geography in intellectual and social contexts, in relation to developments in the sciences, culture, geopolitics and the world economy. The purpose of the historical survey is to provide background for examining contemporary approaches to geographical questions, focusing especially on the relations between geographical knowledge and power. We conduct this critical exercise by examining ’ engagements with contemporary social theory and their endeavors to tease out the relations of power embedded in geographical concepts such as nature, space, place, landscape, etc. as well as in material spaces, environments, landscapes, etc. In the process we maintain focus on the tensions between geographic thought, the product of reflecting on the world and our position in it, and the discipline of geography, the enabling, institutionalization and containment of geographic thought. The ultimate aim of the course is to develop the critical conceptual and theoretical tools with which to think geographically about the planet and the world. The course does not assume any background or extensive knowledge of the subject, but the student’s critical interest and willingness to engage in critical discussion. Course format

All students are required to attend all sessions and to cover the assigned readings before class. The course comprises lectures and seminars. Classes will depend on every student’s commitment to the course: preparedness before class, willingness to engage with the readings, raise questions and participate in class discussion. Open and critical debate is an essential part of a education—students are encouraged to converse and disagree with each other respectfully. In the second half of the semester students will be asked to prepare short presentations (ca. 10 minutes) and lead class discussion. Students are expected not only to summarize key arguments covered in the assigned readings but also, and more importantly, to present them in ways that elicit class discussion, so students are expected to be active in leading the discussion.

USE OF CELLPHONES, LAPTOPS, TABLETS, AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE CLASSROOM.

1 Geography 470: History and eory of Geography Spring 2015

Reading material

Required books: 1. Livingstone, David N. 1992. The Geographical Tradition: Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

2. Cresswell, Tim. 2013. Geographic Thought: A Critical Introduction. Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell.

3. Wainwright, Joel. 2013. Geopiracy: Oaxaca, Militant , and Geographical Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

All three books are available at Rutgers University Bookstore. Also, copies will be placed on reserve at Kilmer Library.

All other readings are available through the course website on Sakai, under Resources, in folders with the same titles as the respective class sessions organized in chronological order.

Student evaluation 1) Midterm exam: 40%; 2) Final exam: 40%; 3) Performance 20% (including attendance, class presentation and participation in discussion).

The final exam is on Wednesday, May 13, 4:00–7:00 PM.

2 Geography 470: History and eory of Geography Spring 2015

Syllabus

Tuesday Jan 20 Introduction to the course

Thursday Jan 22 Thinking geographically in action

Harvey, David. 2004. Geographical knowledges/political powers. Proceedings of British Academy 122, pp. 87-115.

Kropotkin, Peter. 1885. What geography ought to be. The Nineteenth Century 18: 940–56.

Part I: Writing the

Tuesday Jan 27 Telling the story of geography: history, theory, writing

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapter 1.

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 1.

Thursday Jan 29 The contextualist approach to the history of geography

Smith, Neil. 1987. Academic war over the field of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 (2): 155–172.

Commentaries and Smith’s response: Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78: 144–163.

Tuesday Feb 3 Women in the production of geographical knowledge

Monk, Janice. 2004. Women, gender and the of American geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94: 1-22.

Domosh, Mona. 1991. Toward a feminist of geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16 (1): pp. 95–104.

Commentary by David Stoddart and Domosh’s response: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16(4): 484–490.

Thursday Feb 5 Race and racism in (the history of) geography

Kobayashi, Audrey. 2014. The dialectic of race and the discipline of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (6): 1101–1115.

Wilson Gilmore, Ruth. 2002. Fatal couplings of power and difference: notes on racism and geography. The Professional 54 (1): 15–24

Pulido, Laura. 2002. Reflections on a white discipline. The Professional Geographer 54 (1): 42–49.

Bunge, William. 1965. Racism in geography. The Crisis 72 (8): 494–497, 538.

3 Geography 470: History and eory of Geography Spring 2015

Part II: The of geographical knowledge

Tuesday Feb 10 The emergence of modern geography

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapters 2–3.

Thursday Feb 12 Exploration, knowledge and empire

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapter 2.

Tuesday Feb 17 Science, social utility and natural theology

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapters 3–4.

Thursday Feb 19 Imperial science

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapter 5.

Tuesday Feb 24 Environment, race and empire

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapters 6–7

Thursday Feb 26 History, culture and the particularity of place

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapter 8.

Tuesday March 3 Areal differentiation: geography as chorology

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapter 9, pp. 304–316.

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 4.

Barnes, T. J. and M. Farish. 2006. Between : science, militarism, and American geography from world war to cold war. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96: 807–26.

Thursday March 5 The quantitative revolution: geography as spatial science

Livingstone, The Geographical Tradition. Chapter 9, pp. 316–346.

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 5.

Barnes, T. J. 2008: Geography’s Underworld: the military-industrial complex, mathematical modelling, and the quantitative revolution. Geoforum 39: 3–16.

Tuesday March 10 MIDTERM EXAM

Thursday March 12 Return of midterm exam and general discussion.

4 Geography 470: History and eory of Geography Spring 2015

Tuesday March 17 No class. Spring recess March 14–22 Thursday March 19

Part III: Contemporary geographical thought

Tuesday March 24 Humanistic geography

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 6.

Peet, Richard. 1998. , phenomenology, and humanistic geography. Chapter 2 of Modern Geographical Thought. Blackwell.

Thursday March 26 Radical/

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 7.

Peet, Richard. 1998. Radical geography, marxism and marxist geography. Chapter 3 of Modern Geographical Thought. Blackwell.

Peet, Richard. 1985. Radical Geography in the United States: A Personal History. Antipode 17 (2–3): 1-17.

Tuesday March 31

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 8.

Rose, Gillian. 1993. The geographical imagination: knowledge and critique. Chapter 4 of and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Polity Press.

McDowell, Linda. 1999. Introduction: place and gender. Chapter 1 of Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist . University of Minnesota Press.

Thursday April 2 Postmodern geography

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 9.

Gregory, Derek. 1994. Chinatown part three? uncovering postmodern geographies. Chapter 4 of Geographical Imaginations. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Tuesday April 7 Poststructural geography

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapters 10–11.

Woodward, Keith and Jennifer Lea. 2010. Geographies of Affect. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Geographies. Eds. Susan J. Smith, Rachel Pain, Sallie A. Marston, and John Paul Jones III. London: Sage.

5 Geography 470: History and eory of Geography Spring 2015

Thursday April 9 More-than- geographies

Cresswell, Geographic Thought. Chapter 12.

Wolch, Jennifer. 2002. Anima urbis. in 26(6): 721–742.

Tuesday April 14 Blues epistemology Woods, Clyde. 1998. What happens to a dream arrested? (Chapter 1); The blues tradition of explanation (Chapter 2). In Development arrested: the blues and plantation power in the Mississippi Delta. London: Verso.

Thursday April 16 Demonic grounds: black, radical, feminist

McKittrick, Katherine. 2006. Geographic stories (Introduction); I lost an arm on my last trip home: black geographies (Chapter 1); The last place they thought of: black women’s geographies (Chapter 2). In Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the of Struggle. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Tuesday April 21 Schedule to be determined: Annual meeting of the Association of Thursday April 23 American Geographers, April 21–25

Tuesday April 28 Geographic thought against the disciplining of geography

Wainwright, Geopiracy.

Thursday April 30 Commentary by Emily Gilbert: Human Geography 7 (3): 78–82. Commentaries and Wainwright’s response: Dialogues in Human Geography 4 (1): 86–101.

6