DOCSLIB.ORG

Neutering Addison and Steele: Aesthetic Failure and the Spectatorial Public Sphere Author(S): Anthony Pollock Source: ELH, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neutering Addison and Steele: Aesthetic Failure and the Spectatorial Public Sphere Author(S): Anthony Pollock Source: ELH, Vol Neutering Addison and Steele: Aesthetic Failure and the Spectatorial Public Sphere Author(s): Anthony Pollock Source: ELH, Vol. 74, No. 3 (Fall, 2007), pp. 707-734 Published by: Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30029578 Accessed: 19-11-2015 08:31 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30029578?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ELH. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 150.135.239.97 on Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:31:14 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions NEUTERING ADDISON AND STEELE: AESTHETIC FAILURE AND THE SPECTATORIALPUBLIC SPHERE BY ANTHONYPOLLOCK More than four decades after its initial publication, Jiirgen Habermas'sStructural Transformation of the Public Sphere remains an unavoidablestarting point for studies of early eighteenth-century print culture. For Habermas,of course, the development of English coffee-house culture and its periodicalpress markedthe emergence of a potentiallyegalitarian discursive space, a realm governed more by the rationalforce of the better argumentthan by the institutional force of existing power relations.' Extending Habermas'sargument, historianLawrence Klein has recentlyargued that figureslike Anthony Ashley Cooper (Third Earl of Shaftesbury),Joseph Addison, and RichardSteele promotedan urbaneethos of sociabilitythrough their ideal of polite conversation,a form of dialogue that offered a "nor- mative frameworkfor human relationssince its conventionsimplied the values of freedom, equality,activity, pleasure, and restraint."2For Habermas'scritics, on the other hand, this interpretationof the post- Restorationpublic sphere is compromised:either by the blind spots in Habermas'stheory itself-especially regardingissues of gender and class-or by the fact that Habermas'sEnlightenment publicness was managedby preciselythose empowered Englishmenwhose interests it was supposed to scrutinize.3But both Habermasiansand their op- ponents leave unquestionedthe claim that post-RestorationEnglish writers imaginedtheir public sphere as a form of dialogic,conversa- tionalsociability focused on "rational-criticalpublic debate."4Addison and Steele, however,insisted that their paradigmaticperiodical The Spectator (1711-1714), despite its print dissemination, should be thought of as a vehicle for privatelyconsumed, surrogatevisuality-a spectatorialmodel of publicness.5 Addison and Steele's shift from a conversationalto a spectatorial model of print culture underminesrecent scholarlyconsensus about what these periodicalistshoped to achieve.6As a representativeread- ing, we can take Terry Eagleton'sview that Addison and Steele em- body the earliestexamples of criticism's"substantive social function," promotingsocial consolidationthrough their periodicalsby "codifying ELH 74 (2007) 707-734 c 2007 by The Johns HopkinsUniversity Press 707 This content downloaded from 150.135.239.97 on Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:31:14 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions norms"and "regulatingpractices"; as such, the Spectatorialproject is imaginedto be that of "consciouslyeducating a heterogeneouspublic into the universalforms of reason, taste and morality."'7Though they would emphasizethe criticalfunction of the public sphere more than Eagleton does, Habermasianswould agree that Addison and Steele register the early eighteenth-centurydesire for a particularkind of ethical social order and that their texts reflect a confident effort at reform.Erin Mackiehas complicatedthe imageof Addisonand Steele as reformersby suggestingthat, to succeed in the market,the essayists "depend upon" the same disruptivesocioeconomic forces that they "warnagainst" in their papers; even so, Mackie still views Addison and Steele as deeply invested in getting readersto "do, say,like, and buy the right thing[s]."8 One task of this essay will be to reconcilethe longstandingidea of Addisonand Steele as promotersof Augustanvalues-decorum, good sense, politeness-with the almostcomplete absence in their work of characterswho exemplifythese values.9Critics often view Mr.Specta- tor, the eidolon of Addisonand Steele'speriodical, as a model of the polite sociabilityhe is taken to promote, a readingthat equates Mr. Spectatorwith his creators'public images. J. G. A. Pocock has noted that Addisonand Steele, like manyupwardly-mobile mercantile Whigs in early eighteenth-centuryEngland, wanted to distance themselves from "new types of personality"that provided easy targets for Tory propagandists,personalities whose status depended upon a tenuous credit economy that made them seem "unprecedentedlydangerous and unstable";as a result, Addisonand Steele often claimed cultural patrilineagefrom a kindof neo-classical"Roman mythology"--with Cato as a model-in orderto appear"self-mastered, stoic, andpublic."'a Mr. Spectatoroccasionally wants to be this kindof figure,but his behaviors and inclinationsare hardlythose of the stablesocial hero. In Spectator 131, Mr. Spectatoradmits he "doesnot love Jollityand what they call Good-Neighbourhood";he makes"a very unsociable Figure" during his visit to Sir Roger'scountry estate, and he resolvesto returnto London "inorder to be alone"amid anonymouscrowds (S, 2:20, 21). As read- ers' surrogateparticipants in the disorderlypublic sphere,Addison and Steele's personae characteristicallydo not intervene, they withdraw. Mr. Spectator repeatedly removes himself from urban scenes that threatento overwhelmhim. Even the editorialpersona of the Tatler, the slightlymore extrovertedIsaac Bickerstaff,offers a ratherlimited assessment of what spectatorialjudgment can achieve: he hopes his laborsas culturalcritic "canbut wear one Impertinenceout of human 708 NeuteringAddison and Steele This content downloaded from 150.135.239.97 on Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:31:14 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Life, destroy a single Vice, or give a Morning'sChearfulness to an honest Mind,"as the minimalcondition of his not havingwritten "in vain" (T, 2:278). This perking up of the coffee-hour hardlymatches Eagleton'sdescription of Addison and Steele's "juridicaltechnology" bent on "scourgingdeviation and repressingthe transgressive."11 Perhaps we can better account for Addison and Steele's compli- cated relationshipto the supposedlydeviant elements in their culture by expandingon Mackie'sinsight that their periodicalpapers rely on the subversiveforces they want to contain. In fact, the papers col- laboratein the very productionor performanceof the disorderthey describe. Rather than encouragingsocial reform, the papers create an ideologicallyuseful image of the public sphere as beyond manage- ability.In the readingsthat follow,a blueprintfor their culturalproject emerges: the papers begin by depicting a public world in desperate need of regulation,but their subsequent attemptsto establishorder end up allegorizingthe failure, and even the illegitimacy,of their own disciplinaryefforts.12 In an apparentparadox, by establishingthe unmanageabilityof the public sphere, the papers attainwhat I would call their managerialmoment: the papers imply that social reform is not feasible, but they redeem that impossibilityby cultivatinga spec- tatorialethos that imaginesits public impotenceas both necessaryand unfortunate.As I hope to prove, the ideal of spectatorialneutrality or of "standingNeuter" is central to Addison and Steele's cultural project (S, 1:479). While previous readings emphasize Addison and Steele'sdesire to reformcontrary energies in earlyeighteenth-century England, I argue that the papers stage the failure of their public en- gagement in order to enable a privately-conductedneutralization (in the sense of "render[ing]ineffective") of their audience'simpulse to make ethics public.13Addison and Steele enforce a strict separation between an irremediablyantagonistic social realm and a compensatory private sphere of ethicallylegitimated spectatorship.In and through their periodicalessays, they develop an influential,aesthetic model of English publicness that theoreticallyassuages the violence it cannot practicallyprevent. I. VISION AND SOCIALORDER: THE SPECTATORIALPROJECT John Barrell has shown how eighteenth-centuryBritish writers hoped to containthe growingfragmentation of their society by offer- ing persuasiverepresentations of it as still unified.14As Barrellpoints out, only those who could be considered disinterestedwere deemed AnthonyPollock 709 This content downloaded from 150.135.239.97 on Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:31:14 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions qualified to give an account of the social totality.Even magistrates and statesmen would not meet this standardof disinterestedness, since their perspectiveswere limited by the demandsof their specific occupations.To be reliable, the ideal spectator must be a property owner free from any particularemployment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moral Intent in the Plays and Dramatic Criticism of Richard Steele
    Moral intent in the plays and dramatic criticism of Richard Steele Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Feldman, Donna Rose, 1925- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 01:14:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318914 MORAL INTENT IN THE PLAYS AND DRAMATIC CRITICISM OF RICHARD STEELE by Donna Feldman A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate College University of Arizona 19^8 Approved» - Director of Thesis mm SiVsoO- TABLE OF COUTEiTS CHAPTER,: ' ■ : . ■ ; : : ; ' PAGE ' lo. IITRQDHCTIOI . , . = . = . o'-.o . 1 : II. EIGLISH DRAMA TO THE TIME OP STEELE, 8 III. STEELE'S EARLY PLAYS o o o o o o o o o 31 Introduction to the Study 31 The Funeral o o o o o o 0 o o d „o/ e 32 : Plot synopsis.' , o o o o <y o o o 32 Theme,o » o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3% Moral intent . » . .. N-0 o o o o o hh General effectiveness.>0.0 P o o O hS The Lying Lover' O O 0,00 O O 6 46 Plot synopsis. O .O 9 0 o o o o > ? Tlfe^ie.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Steele: a Conscious Rationalist
    RICHARD STEELE: A CONSCIOUS RATIONALIST By ELMO MURRAY ~~LL Bachelor of Arts Harding College Searcy, Arkansas 1953 Master of Arts Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas 1965 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 197 4 Tk-.u~ I 9 7f/ D fll?'-/r, ~.;L OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY M,~,Y 1 1 1976 RICHARD STEELE: A CONSCIOUS RATIONALIST Thesis approved: s~ tl 11/'~~ Thesis Advisor Dean of the Gradu~te College 938620 ii PREFACE This study represents an attempt to identify the intellectual premises underlying the religious, social, and political writings of Richard Steele, 1672-1729. Although Steele generally spoke through a persona, especially in his periodical essays, this study assumes that these personas speak for Steele. Furthermore, all of Steele 1 s writings have been used, as representing his views whether they were his e·ssays, his tracts, his plays, or his letters. I would like to express deep gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Samuel Woods, Jr., for his great patien·ce and help. I would also like to express appreciation to the other members of my committee, all of whom offered valuable criticisms: Dr. David Berkeley, Dr. Walter Scott, Dr. Judson Milburn, and Dr. William Wray. I would like to express appreciation to my typists, Mrs. Rita McGinnis and Mrs. Linda King, for their excellent work. Finally, I wish to express deep gratitude to my wife, Anita, and my children, Janet and Teresa, for their patience, encouragement, and many, many sacrifices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spectator
    The Spectator Background :- The character of Sir Roger de Coverley is representative of the old-fashioned country gentleman. He is first mentioned in the essay titled “The Spectator Club” whose purpose was to introduce the central “characters” as “men intended to represent the entire range of public opinion and enlightened bias”. The imaginary members of the Spectator Club were mirrors on to which the authors’ own ideas about society were reflected. The ‘members’ included representatives of the army, of commerce, of the town and of the country gentry (Sir Roger). Sir Roger is defined as a gentleman of ancient descent, a baronet (a member of the lowest hereditary titled British order). He is marked by the singularity of his character as a 56 year old mirthful bachelor, loved by the people around him rather than esteemed. Social History of The Spectator essays (publication years- 1711 to 1712): A daily periodical published in London. Main contributors- Sir Richard Steele and Joseph Addison. Addison took the lead with The Spectator. It was published every day except on Sundays. In fact, before the birth of this periodical, Steele had started The Tatler in the year 1709, publishing three times a week. This could be seen as a precursor to the kind of innovative, imaginative periodical writing which made The Spectator so popular and left its imprint on the literary world. Aim- “To enliven Morality with Wit, and to temper Wit with Morality”. The purpose of the fictional framework of the periodicals was to teach politeness to a transforming society and to bring the topic of morality into the everyday conversations of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Addison and Richard Steele. Selections from the Spectator Papers
    RESTORATION AND 18TH-CENTURY BRITISH LITERATURE GRADUATE COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION READING LIST SELECTED BY THE GRADUATE FACULTY THE DEGREE CANDIDATE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING READ ALL OF THE FOLLOWING WORKS: PROSE: Joseph Addison and Richard Steele. Selections from The Spectator Papers Aphra Behn. Oroonoko James Boswell. Selections from The Life of Johnson Edmund Burke. Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful Daniel Defoe. Robinson Crusoe or Moll Flanders Olaudah Equiano. The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano Henry Fielding. Shamela, Joseph Andrews David Hume. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: Section X, Parts I-II (“Of Miracles”) Samuel Johnson. Rasselas, Selections from The Rambler John Locke. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding: Book II, Chapter I (“Of Ideas in general, and their Original”); Book IV, Chapter XIX (“Of Enthusiasm”) Samuel Pepys. Selections from The Diary Ann Radcliffe. The Mysteries of Udolpho Samuel Richardson. Pamela Laurence Sterne. Tristram Shandy Jonathan Swift . “A Modest Proposal,” Gulliver’s Travels Horace Walpole. The Castle of Otranto Mary Wollstonecraft. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: Chapter 2; Chapter 9; Chapter 13, Section 6 Restoration/18th-Century British Literature 1 Rev. 1 August 2014 VERSE: Aphra Behn. “The Disappointment” Samuel Butler. Hudibras: Book I, Canto I John Dryden. “MacFlecknoe,” Absalom and Achitophel Oliver Goldsmith. “The Deserted Village” Thomas Gray. “Elegy Written in a Country Church-Yard” Samuel Johnson. “The Vanity of Human Wishes,”“London” Bernard Mandeville. “The Grumbling Hive; or, Knaves Turned Honest” (from The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits) Alexander Pope. “An Essay on Criticism”; “The Rape of the Lock”; An Essay on Man: “Epistle I”; The Dunciad: “Book the First” Jonathan Swift , “A Description of the Morning,”“A Description of a City Shower,”“Cassinus and Peter,”“Verses on the Death of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Field List: Restoration and Early Eighteenth Century
    University of California, Berkeley Department of English Qualifying Exam Reading Lists Historical Field List: Restoration and Early Eighteenth Century Note: As per the graduate handbook, “historical field lists are advisory rather than contractual; they determine the parameters of the exam, but do not rule out the possibility that the conversation may range more broadly. Students may not refer to historical field lists during the exam.” Samuel Pepys “Absolom and Achitophel” (1681) Diary Selections (1660) “MacFlecknoe” (1682) “To the Memory of Mr. Oldham” John Bunyan (1684) Grace Abounding to the Chief of “To the Pious Memory of Anne Sinners (1666) Killigrew” (1686) “To my Dear Friend Mr. John Dryden Congreve” (1693) “Annus Mirabilis” (1667) An Essay of Dramatic Poesy (1668) Aphra Behn Oroonoko (1688) John Milton Paradise Lost (1667) Jeremy Collier Samson Agonistes (1671) “A Short View of the Immoralityand Profaneness of the Andrew Marvell English Stage” (1698) “On Mr. Milton’s Paradise Lost” (1674) Mary Astell Some Reflections Upon Marriage John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester (1700) “The Maimed Debauchee” (1675) “The Imperfect Enjoyment” William Congreve (1675) The Way of the World (1700) “A Ramble in St. James’ Park” (1675) Anne Finch “A Satyr Against Mankind” “The Spleen” (1701) (1675) Jonathan Swift William Wycherley A Tale of a Tub (1704) The Country Wife (1675) “A Description of a City Shower” (1710) George Etherege “Stella’s Birth-day” (1721) The Man of Mode, or, Sir Fopling Gulliver’s Travels (1726) Flutter (1676) “A Modest Proposal” (1729) “Strephon and Chloe” (1731) John Dryden 2 “The Lady’s Dressing Room” (1732) Delarivier Manley The New Atalantis (1709) Joseph Addison, Richard Steele Selections from The Spectator (1711) Alexander Pope An Essay on Criticism (1711) “The Rape of the Lock” (1712) “Windsor Forest” (1713) The Dunciad (1728) “Epistle to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 5: Restoration and 18Th-Century British Literature Primary Texts 1) Drama William Wycherley, the Country Wife (1675) Aphra
    Area 5: Restoration and 18th-Century British Literature Primary Texts 1) Drama William Wycherley, The Country Wife (1675) Aphra Behn, The Rover (1677) John Dryden, All for Love (1677) Thomas Otway, Venice Preserved (1682) William Congreve, The Way of the World (1700) Richard Steele, The Conscious Lovers (1722) John Gay, The Beggar’s Opera (1728) George Lillo, The London Merchant (1731) Oliver Goldsmith, She Stoops to Conquer (1773) or Richard Brinsley Sheridan, The School For Scandal (1777) Frances Burney, The Witlings (1778-1780) 2) Verse John Dryden, “Astraea Redux” (1660); “To my Honored Friend, Dr. Charleton...” (1663); Annus Mirabilis (1667); “Absalom and Achitophel” (1681); “Mac Flecknoe” (1684); “To the Pious Memory of . Anne Killigrew” (1685); “A Song for St. Cecilia’s Day” (1687) John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, “A Satire Against Reason and Mankind” (1679); “The Imperfect Enjoyment”; “The Disabled Debauchee”; “A Ramble in St. James Park” (1680) Aphra Behn, “The Disappointment” (1680); “The Golden Age”; “On Her Loving Two Equally” (1684),“To the Fair Clarinda”; “On Desire” (1688) Daniel Defoe, The True-Born Englishman [selections from Part I and Part II] (1700) Anne Finch, Countess of Winchilsea, “The Spleen” (1701); “A Nocturnal Reverie”; “To the Nightingale” (1713) Mary, Lady Chudleigh, “To the Ladies”; “To Almystrea” (1703) Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism (1709); “Windsor Forest” (1713); “The Rape of the Lock”; “Eloisa to Abelard”; “Epistle to Miss Blount” (1717); An Essay on Man (1733), “An Epistle from Mr. Pope to Dr. Arbuthnot”; “Epistle 2. To a Lady” (1735), The Dunciad in Four Books [cf. 1728 ed. in 3Books] (1743) Jonathan Swift, “A Description of a City Shower” (1710); “On Stella’s Birth-Day 1719”, “Stella’s Birth-Day 1727” (1728); “Verses on the Death of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Handel's Early London Operas
    Journal of Interdisciplinary History, xxxvi:3 (Winter, 2006), 445–472. HANDEL’S EARLY LONDON OPERAS Paul Monod The Politics of Handel’s Early London Operas, 1711–1718 It was the winter of 1710, and, according to John Mainwaring, Handel’s earliest biographer, “scarce a mail arrived . which did not bring some fresh account of victories or advan- tages gained by the English hero [John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough] over the armies of a Monarch, but lately the terror of Europe [Louis XIV].” Yet England, victorious in war, was also a nation torn by partisan strife between Whigs and Tories. The former adhered to principles of resistance to tyranny, toleration for religious dissenters, and war with France; the latter advocated obe- dience to monarchy, Anglican hegemony, and peace abroad. What the divided polity needed, Mainwaring wrote, was music— speciªcally, Handel’s music. “Nothing indeed seemed wanting to compleat the national felicity, but a person capable of charming down, by the magic of his melody, that evil spirit of faction and party, which fortune seems, at this time, to have conjured up.” Unfortunately, the magic did not work. “Handel, great as he was, could not do for England, what David did for Saul,” although Mainwaring implies that he made a good try at it.1 Mainwaring was not accurate about Marlborough’s great vic- tories, which had ended over a year before, but he was correct about the intense party strife of this period. It had reached a peak in February 1710 with the decision of the Whig government to put on trial Henry Sacheverell, a Tory clergyman, for preaching a seditious sermon.
    [Show full text]
  • Drama 17Th and 18Th Centuries: Heroic Drama, Restoration Comedy, Sentimental Drama
    Drama 17th and 18th centuries: Heroic Drama, Restoration Comedy, Sentimental Drama Early Drama by Women: 1623-1673 Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle (16plays) 1632-1664 Katherine Philips (“Orinda”): Pompey (1663) and Horace Frances Boothby, Marcella 1640-1689 Aphra Behn: The Rover (1677); The City Heiress (1682); The Lucky Chance (1686) 1666-1709 Mary Pix (“Ariadne”): 1695 She Ventures and She Wins; ?1697: The Unnatural Mother [attributed to her] 1669-1723 Susanah Centlivre: The Perjured Husband (1700); A Bold Stroke for a Wife (1718) 1679-1749 Catharine Trotter: Love at loss (1700) Male Contemporaries: 1608-1674 John Milton Paradise Lost (1663?) 1628-1688 John Bunyan Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners (1666) The Pilgrim´s Progress (1676) 1631-1700 John Dryden The Indian Queen (1664); Marriage á la Mode (1672); Troilus and Cressida (1679); All for Love (1578); Amphitryon (1690) ?1634-91 Sir George Etherege The Man of Mode (1676) 1641-1715 William Wycherley The Country Wife (1675), The Plain-Dealer (1676) 1652-1685 Thomas Otway: Venice Preserv´d (1682) 1664-1726 Sir John Vanbrug The Relapse (1696); The Provok´d Wife (1697) 1670-1729 William Congreve The Double Dealer (1694); Love for Love (1695); The Way of the World (1700) 1672-1729 Richard Steele The Tender Husband (1705); The Conscious Lovers (1722) 1672-1719 Joseph Addison Cato (1713) 1674-1718 Nicholas Rowe The Fair Penitent (1703); Jane Shore (1714); Lady Jane Grey (1715) 1677?-1707 George Farquhar The Twin Rivals (1702); The Recruiting Officer (1706); The Beaux´ Strategem
    [Show full text]
  • The Periodical Essays of Steele, Addison, Johnson, and Goldsmith
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects English 1962 Advisors of the age of reason: The periodical essays of Steele, Addison, Johnson, and Goldsmith Carol Meyers Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/eng_honproj Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Meyers, Carol, "Advisors of the age of reason: The periodical essays of Steele, Addison, Johnson, and Goldsmith" (1962). Honors Projects. 24. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/eng_honproj/24 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. ADVISORS OF THE AGE OF REASON: THE PERIODICAL ESSAYS OF STEELE, ADDISON, JOHNSON, AND GOLDSMITH by Carol Meyers Submitted in Fulfillment of the Honors Program in English Int:roduction The periodical essay of the eighteenth century invited men of the Age of Reason to pour into it their talent and thought; it was a form in which they could make their points briefly and effectively; it was flexible, and was eventually familiar enough to be vTell-received.
    [Show full text]
  • Proper Names in Plays, by Chance Or Design?
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 5 11-1-1962 Proper Names in Plays, by Chance or Design? M. C. Golightly Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Golightly, M. C. (1962) "Proper Names in Plays, by Chance or Design?," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol5/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Golightly: Proper Names in Plays, by Chance or Design? proper names in plays by chance or design M C GOLIGHTLY readers of fictional material are generally subconsciously impressed with names given to characters in a play or story by an author without being aware of any underlying motiva- tion on the part of the author for having given them such names are ostensibly given through the creative process in an attempt to produce such symbolic representation of that char- acter which best expresses a personal estimate or understand- ing of it insofar as the author is concernedisconcerned this understand- ing takes place in part in the mind of the reader by his in- stinctive reaction to the name a process of which he is seldom aware it is logical to assume that these names like any other appellationsappellations given to any person place or thing are created from
    [Show full text]
  • Field List: the Long Eighteenth Century • Joseph Addison And
    Field list: The Long Eighteenth Century Joseph Addison and Richard Steele, The Spectator 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 26, 34, 50, 57, 66, 69, 81, 88, 106, 108, 109, 112, 113, 117, 119, 122, 130, 132, 137, 174, 189, 251, 261, 182, 203, 266, 276, 324, 335, 454, 517, 519 (1711-12) Joseph Addison, Cato (1713) Penelope Aubin, Charlotta du Pont (1722) Mary Astell, A Serious Proposal to the Ladies (1694) Anna Barbauld, Poems (1773) Jane Barker, The Galesia Trilogy, Part 1 (i.e./aka, “Love Intrigues,” 1719) William Beckford, Vathek (1782-French, 1786-English) Aphra Behn, Oroonoko (1678); The Rover (1677-81); Love Letters Between a Nobleman and His Sister (1684-87); poems: “The Disapointment,” “On Her Loving Two Equally,” and “To the Fair Clarinda” James Boswell, The London Journal (1762-3); Life of Johnson (1791) Frances Brooke, The Excursion (1777) Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry Into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1756) Frances Burney, Evelina (1778) Margaret Cavendish, Blazing World (1666) Susannah Centlivre, A Bold Stroke for a Wife (1718) Mary, Lady Chudleigh, “The Ladies Defence” (1700), “To the Ladies,” “The Inquiry,” “On the Death of My Honoured Mother,” Essays in Prose and Verse: “Of Knowledge,” “To the Ladies,” “Of Friendship,” John Cleland, Fanny Hill (1748) William Congreve, The Way of the World (1700) Hannah Cowley, The Belle’s Stratagem (1780) William Cowper, The Task: “Expostulation,” “Conversation,” “Retirement,” “The Castaway” (1785) Daniel Defoe, Robinson Crusoe (1719) John Dryden, All For Love (1678); “Absalom and Achitophel” (1681); “Mac Flecknoe” (1684); “To the Pious Memory of ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Periodical Essays of Steele, Addison, Johnson, and Goldsmith Carol Meyers Illinois Wesleyan University
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects English 1962 Advisors of the age of reason: The periodical essays of Steele, Addison, Johnson, and Goldsmith Carol Meyers Illinois Wesleyan University Recommended Citation Meyers, Carol, "Advisors of the age of reason: The periodical essays of Steele, Addison, Johnson, and Goldsmith" (1962). Honors Projects. Paper 24. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/eng_honproj/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Ames Library, the Andrew W. Mellon Center for Curricular and Faculty Development, the Office of the Provost and the Office of the President. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Commons @ IWU by the faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. ADVISORS OF THE AGE OF REASON: THE PERIODICAL ESSAYS OF STEELE, ADDISON, JOHNSON, AND GOLDSMITH by Carol Meyers Submitted in Fulfillment of the Honors Program in English Int:roduction The periodical essay of the eighteenth century invited men of the Age of Reason to pour into it their talent and thought; it was a form in which they could make their points briefly and effectively; it was flexible, and was eventually familiar enough to be vTell-received. The form itself reflecteo the common-sense practicality, restraint and moderation that the periodical v�iters were advocating. In one balanced, com­ paratively short piece of "�iting, a thought "las developed-- in an easy, quiet and painless manner--that could be driven home in later essays over a long period of time. If a vlriter had a pet idea or philosophy, he ':Ias given a medium for fixing it firmly in his reader's mind by repeating his thought at irregu�ar intervals.
    [Show full text]