DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Management Sub-Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Construction Environmental Management Plan Compliance Matrix CRRDA REQUIREMENT ADDRESSED IN SECTION REFERENCE Coordinator-General’s change report – whole of project refinements 2019 Appendix 1 – Part C. – Condition 4 Construction Environmental Management Plan (a) Prior to the commencement of Project Work, a Construction Environmental This Plan Management Plan for those works (Relevant Project Work) must be developed by the Proponent and endorsed by the Environmental Monitor as being consistent with the Outline EMP and these imposed conditions. (b) The endorsed Construction Environmental Management Plan must be submitted to This Plan the Coordinator General at least 20 business days prior to the commencement of Relevant Project Works. (c) The Construction Environmental Management Plan must: (i) describe the Relevant Project Work Section 2 (ii) be based on predictive studies and assessments of construction impacts Relevant sub-plans which have regard to the scale, intensity, location and duration of construction works, and location of Directly Affected Persons (iii) be generally consistent with the Outline EMP and incorporate its This Plan environmental outcomes and performance criteria (iv) incorporate and respond to the Imposed Conditions (Construction) This Plan and associated Sub-plans (v) demonstrate that the Imposed Conditions (Construction) will be complied This Plan and associated Sub-plans with during Relevant Project Work (vi) incorporate the community engagement plan, including the complaints Sections 4.3, 6 and 8 management process, in accordance with Condition 9 (vii) where predictive studies indicate impacts beyond those provided for in the Associated sub-plans performance criteria, incorporate mitigation measures to achieve the environmental outcomes (viii) establish specific mitigation measures and processes for consultation with This Plan and associated Sub-plans Directly Affected Persons for Project Works under Conditions 9(c), 11(c), and 11(e) (ix) contain a program and procedures for ongoing monitoring to identify the Section 7.2 and associated sub-plans effectiveness of mitigation measures in achieving the Imposed Conditions (Construction) and the environmental outcomes in (iii) (x) include a process for regular review and if required updating of the Section 8.3 and associated sub-plans Construction Environmental Management Plan, including a process to review and implement additional or different mitigation measures in response to monitoring results (xi) incorporate the EMP sub-plans required by the Imposed Conditions or as All associated sub-plans required by the approved Outline EMP. i Construction Environmental Management Plan CRRDA REQUIREMENT ADDRESSED IN SECTION REFERENCE (d) The Construction Environmental Management Plan must be implemented for the This Plan duration of Relevant Project Work. (e) Relevant Project Work is authorised if it is undertaken in accordance with the This Plan Construction Environmental Management Plan. (f) The Construction Environmental Management Plan must be publicly available on the Section 8.4 project website for the duration of the construction phase. (g) The Construction Environmental Management Plan may be updated. (i) updates to the Construction Environmental Management Plan that include Section 8.3 new or additional Relevant Project Work must be endorsed by the Environmental Monitor as being consistent with condition 2 before Relevant Project Work may proceed. (h) Updates to the Construction Environmental Management Plan that are limited to new Section 8.3 or different mitigation measures for Managed Work may be endorsed by the Environmental Monitor. ii Construction Environmental Management Plan Details of Revision Amendments Document Control The CBGU Project Director is responsible for ensuring that this Plan is reviewed and approved. The Project Environment & Sustainability Manager is responsible for updating this Plan to reflect changes to the Project, legal and other requirements, as required. Amendments Any revisions or amendments must be approved by the CBGU Project Director or delegate before being distributed / implemented. Table 1 Document schedule Time for Submission Period during which Project Co must Update Interval provide updates Prior to Relevant Project Works From initial submission until the 6-monthly commencement of Relevant Project Works Revision Details Table 2 Revision details Revision Details A Internal Review 0 Updated Revision - Endorsed by IEM (23/08/2019) & Submitted to CG (23/08/2019) 1 For Review 2 For Review 3 For Review Distribution and Authorisation The CBGU Project Director is responsible for the distribution of this Plan. The controlled master version of this document is available for distribution as appropriate and maintained on TeamBinder. All circulated hard copies of this document are deemed to be uncontrolled. All personnel employed on the Project will perform their duties in accordance with the requirements of this Plan, supporting management plans, and related procedures. Table 3 Distribution List Recipient Distribution Method Cross River Rail Delivery Authority (Delivery Authority) TeamBinder Project Independent Certifier (PIC) TeamBinder CBGU Project Personnel (including SA and FM) As per TeamBinder Distribution List Proof Engineer/Verification Engineer As per TeamBinder Distribution List iii Construction Environmental Management Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose of the CEMP ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Project Summary ................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Site Investigation Works ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Site Establishment Works ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Roma Street .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.2 Albert Street ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2.3 Woolloongabba ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2.4 Boggo Road .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Construction Activities ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 Northern Portal ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.3.2 Roma Street .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3.3 Albert Street ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3.4 Boggo Road / Dutton Park / Southern Portal ............................................................................................................. 8 2.3.5 Woolloongabba ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Construction Sequence ......................................................................................................................... 8 3 Legislative Requirements .................................................................................. 10 3.1 Coordinator-General Conditions ......................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Commonwealth Legislation ................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 State Legislation .................................................................................................................................. 11 3.4 Approvals, Permits and Licences ......................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Guidelines and Standards .................................................................................................................... 12 4 Implementation ................................................................................................. 13 4.1 Environmental Management System Overview .................................................................................. 13 4.1.1 Environmental Aspects and Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Environmental Management Documentation ....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • No. 18 Northern NSW Local Health District

    No. 18 Northern NSW Local Health District

    Submission No 18 ACCESS TO TRANSPORT FOR SENIORS AND DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE IN RURAL AND REGIONAL NSW Organisation: Northern NSW Local Health District Name: Ms Jillian Adams Position: Manager Date Received: 18 July 2016 Health Northern NSW 13 July 2016 NSW GOVERNMENT Local Health District Dora Oravecz Committee Manager NSW Parliament [email protected] ~ Northern NSW Local Health District submission to the Access to Transport for Seniors and Disadvantaged People in Rural and Regional NSW inquiry Dear Ms Oravecz, Northern NSW Health Promotion team has prepared this submission in relation to the NSW Parliament's Access to Transport for Seniors and Disadvantaged People in Rural and Regional NSW inquiry. Northern NSW Health and Northern Rivers Social Development Council jointly prepared a Commuter Bus Plan 2016 (attached) to address transport disadvantage in the Northern Rivers. This plan was initially sent to Transport for NSW for consideration in May 2016 but not funded on the grounds that "TfNSW does not currently have funding to approve the trial". This submission seeks to have the committee consider the Commuter Bus Plan as a means for accessing employment and tertiary education for transport disadvantaged people. There is significant transport disadvantage in Northern NSW. On average, North Coast residents have a household income two thirds oftheir city counterparts. The Northern Rivers Regional Transport Plan 1 states that: "The Northern Rivers region has an above average level of social disadvantage compared to the NSW median." There is a high reliance on private car usage and travel distances are generally longer, with places of employment, education and services spread out across the region.
  • Paul Ormonde's Audio Archive About Jim Cairns Melinda Barrie

    Paul Ormonde's Audio Archive About Jim Cairns Melinda Barrie

    Giving voice to Melbourne’s radical past Paul Ormonde’s audio archive about Jim Cairns Melinda Barrie University of Melbourne Archives (UMA) has recently Melbourne economic historian and federal politician Jim digitised and catalogued journalist Paul Ormonde’s Cairns’.4 Greer’s respect for Cairns’ contribution to social audio archive of his interviews with ALP politician Jim and cultural life in Australia is further corroborated in her Cairns (1914–2003).1 It contains recordings with Cairns, speech at the launch of Protest!, in which she expressed and various media broadcasts that Ormonde used when her concern about not finding any trace of Cairns at the writing his biography of Cairns, A foolish passionate university, and asked about the whereabouts of his archive: man.2 It also serves as an oral account of the Australian ‘I have looked all over the place and the name brings up Labor Party’s time in office in the 1970s after 23 years in nothing … you can’t afford to forget him’.5 Fortunately, opposition.3 Paul Ormonde offered to donate his collection of taped This article describes how Ormonde’s collection was interviews with Cairns not long after Greer’s speech. acquired and the role it has played in the development During his long and notable career in journalism, of UMA’s audiovisual (AV) collection management Ormonde (b. 1931) worked in both print and broadcast procedures. It also provides an overview of the media, including the Daily Telegraph, Sun News Pictorial Miegunyah-funded AV audit project (2012–15), which and Radio Australia. A member of the Australian Labor established the foundation for the care and safeguarding Party at the time of the party split in 1955, he was directly of UMA’s AV collections.
  • Cross River Rail Project Monthly Environmental Report

    Cross River Rail Project Monthly Environmental Report

    Cross River Rail Project Monthly Environmental Report March 2020 Cross River Rail Project Monthly Environmental Report Executive Summary This monthly report has been produced for Project Works undertaken on site for March 2020 for the Rail, Integration and Systems (RIS), and Tunnel, Stations and Development (TSD) packages. This monthly report addresses the obligations outlined in the Coordinator-General’s change report – condition change (hours of works) 2019 (CGCR, October 2019) and the Project’s Outline Environmental Management Plan. The Construction Environmental Management Plans (CEMPs) prepared for the Relevant Project Works being delivered by both Unity Alliance (RIS Contractor) and CBGU JV (TSD Contractor) were endorsed by the Environmental Monitor (EM) and submitted to the Coordinator General in accordance with Condition 4 (a) and 4 (b) respectively. The following Project Works were undertaken in March 2020 – Mayne Area - Surcharge works in a small area of Mayne Yard North using suitable material from the Northern Corridor; and Demolition and removal of redundant infrastructure such as fences, pits, service, OHLE foundations and asbestos drainage culverts completed. Northern Area - Widening of existing access road in Victoria Park and installation of relocated shared user path; Northern Satellite Office facilities were installed and services provided as planned; and Enabling works within the Northern Corridor (removal of unsuitable material). Central Area - Continued site establishment and clearance, fencing and utility works across the central section; Piling preparation and piling across the sites; Shaft Excavation (Roma Street, Woolloongabba and Albert Street); Footbridge demolished and continued demolition works at Roma Street; and Continued demolition of Lot 1 on Albert Street.
  • Local Heritage Register

    Local Heritage Register

    Explanatory Notes for Development Assessment Local Heritage Register Amendments to the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, Schedule 8 and 8A of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, and the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 became effective on 31 March 2008. All aspects of development on a Local Heritage Place in a Local Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, are code assessable (unless City Plan 2000 requires impact assessment). Those code assessable applications are assessed against the Code in Schedule 2 of the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 and the Heritage Place Code in City Plan 2000. City Plan 2000 makes some aspects of development impact assessable on the site of a Heritage Place and a Heritage Precinct. Heritage Places and Heritage Precincts are identified in the Heritage Register of the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy in City Plan 2000. Those impact assessable applications are assessed under the relevant provisions of the City Plan 2000. All aspects of development on land adjoining a Heritage Place or Heritage Precinct are assessable solely under City Plan 2000. ********** For building work on a Local Heritage Place assessable against the Building Act 1975, the Local Government is a concurrence agency. ********** Amendments to the Local Heritage Register are located at the back of the Register. G:\C_P\Heritage\Legal Issues\Amendments to Heritage legislation\20080512 Draft Explanatory Document.doc LOCAL HERITAGE REGISTER (for Section 113 of the Queensland Heritage
  • Gold Coast Infill Stations Project Description Report

    Gold Coast Infill Stations Project Description Report

    Gold Coast Infill Stations Project Description Report April 2021 L\339467772.2 Table of Contents 1. Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Project Background and relationship with Cross River Rail ............................................ 3 3. Project Objectives .......................................................................................................... 5 4. Project Scope ................................................................................................................. 5 4.1 Pimpama Station ....................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Helensvale North Station ........................................................................................... 7 4.3 Merrimac Station ....................................................................................................... 8 L\339467772.2 2 1. Purpose The purpose of this document is to describe the background, objectives, and high-level scope of three new infill train stations being planned on the Gold Coast to Brisbane rail line, at Pimpama, Helensvale North and Merrimac. 2. Project Background and relationship with Cross River Rail The rail line connecting the Gold Coast to Brisbane (Gold Coast Line) is located inland with six existing Gold Coast stations at Ormeau, Coomera, Helensvale, Nerang, Robina and Varsity Lakes. As it provides a public transport trunk route north to Brisbane, the Gold
  • Referral of Proposed Action

    Referral of Proposed Action

    Referral of proposed action Project title: Cross River Rail 1 Summary of proposed action 1.1 Short description The Cross River Rail project is a proposed new 10.2 kilometre rail link in Brisbane connecting Dutton Park in the south to Bowen Hills in the north. The project will include 5.9 kilometres of twin rail tunnels (one track in each direction) under Brisbane’s inner city and new underground rail stations at Albert Street and Roma Street (in the Brisbane CBD), Woolloongabba, Boggo Road and a new surface station at the Exhibition showgrounds. Upgrades and enhancements to parts of the existing rail network will be delivered where these interface with the project and to support Cross River Rail operations. READING NOTE: The Cross River Rail project has previously (2010) been referred to the then Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts under reference number 2010/5427. The project was determined to be ‘not a controlled action - if undertaken in a particular manner’. Further planning and design has been undertaken since the original Cross River Rail concept was referred. This has resulted in a modified project of a smaller scale with reduced potential impacts and enhanced affordability. This referral has been prepared as a new referral based on key changes to the project resulting from further planning and design. The referral has been prepared as a stand-alone document that can be assessed without having to reference the previous referral. While the Cross River Rail proponent does not consider the proposed action likely to have a significant impact on a matter protected under the EPBC Act, this referral has also been prepared in light of the CRR 2010 EPBC decision including a number of particular manner conditions that require reassessment.

  • Inner Brisbane Heritage Walk/Drive Booklet

    Engineering Heritage Inner Brisbane A Walk / Drive Tour Engineers Australia Queensland Division National Library of Australia Cataloguing- in-Publication entry Title: Engineering heritage inner Brisbane: a walk / drive tour / Engineering Heritage Queensland. Edition: Revised second edition. ISBN: 9780646561684 (paperback) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Brisbane (Qld.)--Guidebooks. Brisbane (Qld.)--Buildings, structures, etc.--Guidebooks. Brisbane (Qld.)--History. Other Creators/Contributors: Engineers Australia. Queensland Division. Dewey Number: 919.43104 Revised and reprinted 2015 Chelmer Office Services 5/10 Central Avenue Graceville Q 4075 Disclaimer: The information in this publication has been created with all due care, however no warranty is given that this publication is free from error or omission or that the information is the most up-to-date available. In addition, the publication contains references and links to other publications and web sites over which Engineers Australia has no responsibility or control. You should rely on your own enquiries as to the correctness of the contents of the publication or of any of the references and links. Accordingly Engineers Australia and its servants and agents expressly disclaim liability for any act done or omission made on the information contained in the publication and any consequences of any such act or omission. Acknowledgements Engineers Australia, Queensland Division acknowledged the input to the first edition of this publication in 2001 by historical archaeologist Kay Brown for research and text development, historian Heather Harper of the Brisbane City Council Heritage Unit for patience and assistance particularly with the map, the Brisbane City Council for its generous local history grant and for access to and use of its BIMAP facility, the Queensland Maritime Museum Association, the Queensland Museum and the John Oxley Library for permission to reproduce the photographs, and to the late Robin Black and Robyn Black for loan of the pen and ink drawing of the coal wharf.
  • Construction Environmental Management Plan Cross River Rail – Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance

    Construction Environmental Management Plan Cross River Rail – Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance

    Construction Environmental Management Plan Cross River Rail – Rail, Integration and Systems Alliance Project number: Document number: RIS-UNA-000-001-MPL-000268 Revision date: 23 August 2019 Revision number: 00 Document Approval Rev Date Prepared Reviewed Approved By Remarks By By A 28/06/19 UNITY IEM IEM comments addressed in Rev B Signature: B 20/08/2019 Unity IEM 21 August 2019 IEM comments addressed in Rev C Signature: C 22/08/2019 Unity IEM Nor further comments from IEM Signature: 00 23/08/2019 Unity IEM IEM Endorsed by IEM with Conditions, inclusive of scope restrictions Signature: Table of Contents 1 Purpose of this Plan .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Project Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Project Works - Activities Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Project Works – Areas of Works .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Project Works – Construction Methodologies .........................................................................................................
  • Community Engagement Plan

    Community Engagement Plan

    Community Engagement Plan Compliance Matrix Table 1 Compliance matrix CRRDA REQUIREMENT ADDRESSED IN SECTION REFERENCE Coordinator‐General’s change report – whole of project refinements 2019 Condition 9. Community Engagement Plan (a) The Proponent must develop a community engagement plan as part of the This Plan Construction Environmental Management Plan consistent with the Outline EMP’s Community and Stakeholder Engagement Plan. (b) The community engagement plan must be given to the Community Relations Monitor This Plan for advice at least 10 business days prior to the Construction Environmental Management Plan being provided to the Environmental Monitor. (c) The community engagement plan must provide for: (i) Directly Affected Persons to be consulted prior to commencement of Project Section 2 Works and ongoing thereafter about Project Works, predicted impacts and mitigation measures; (ii) Directly Affected Persons to be consulted about possible mitigation Section 3 measures; (iii) local communities near Project Works to be informed about the nature of Section 3 construction, including the timing, duration and predicted impacts of the works in advance of their commencement; (iv) information to be provided to public transport, road users, pedestrians and Section 3 cyclists about the predicted effects of Project Works on road, rail and pedestrian and cycle network operations, in advance of their commencement; (v) specific community consultation plans for identified key stakeholders; Section 5 (vi) implementation of an Indigenous employment policy, providing for Section 2.3 Indigenous training and employment opportunities; (vii) a process for advance notification to local communities of Project Works, Section 5 including the timing, duration, predicted impacts and mitigation measures, which is available on the project website and through other media.
  • Highways Byways

    Highways Byways

    Highways AND Byways THE ORIGIN OF TOWNSVILLE STREET NAMES Compiled by John Mathew Townsville Library Service 1995 Revised edition 2008 Acknowledgements Australian War Memorial John Oxley Library Queensland Archives Lands Department James Cook University Library Family History Library Townsville City Council, Planning and Development Services Front Cover Photograph Queensland 1897. Flinders Street Townsville Local History Collection, Citilibraries Townsville Copyright Townsville Library Service 2008 ISBN 0 9578987 54 Page 2 Introduction How many visitors to our City have seen a street sign bearing their family name and wondered who the street was named after? How many students have come to the Library seeking the origin of their street or suburb name? We at the Townsville Library Service were not always able to find the answers and so the idea for Highways and Byways was born. Mr. John Mathew, local historian, retired Town Planner and long time Library supporter, was pressed into service to carry out the research. Since 1988 he has been steadily following leads, discarding red herrings and confirming how our streets got their names. Some remain a mystery and we would love to hear from anyone who has information to share. Where did your street get its name? Originally streets were named by the Council to honour a public figure. As the City grew, street names were and are proposed by developers, checked for duplication and approved by Department of Planning and Development Services. Many suburbs have a theme. For example the City and North Ward areas celebrate famous explorers. The streets of Hyde Park and part of Gulliver are named after London streets and English cities and counties.
  • The Invasion of Sturt Creek Basin (Kimberley Region, Western Australia)

    The Invasion of Sturt Creek Basin (Kimberley Region, Western Australia)

    Into the Kimberley: the invasion of the Sturt Creek Basin (Kimberley region, Western Australia) and evidence of Aboriginal resistance Pamela A Smith The extent to which the traditional owners of the upper Sturt Creek basin in the south­ east Kimberley region resisted the exploration and colonisation of their country in the late nineteenth century is generally underestimated and seldom referred to in historical records. This paper documents the exploration and colonisation of the region and anal­ yses accounts of frontier conflict recorded in diaries and other historical documents from this period. These documents provide evidence of many incidents which, when viewed together, suggest that the traditional owners resisted colonisation as best they could without guns, and that the colonists perceived themselves as invaders. The southeast Kimberley was one of the last regions of Australia to be colonised by Europeans. The upper Sturt Creek basin, which occupies much of the southeast Kim­ berley (Figure 1), was the route used by the first European explorers entering the east Kimberley and a major route used by the first pastoralists entering the Kimberley with herds of cattle from Queensland. Much of this land was, and is, the traditional country of Nyininy language speak­ ers (a dialect of Jaru).1 Explorers and early pastoralists would have passed close to, if not through, several important meeting places of the Nyininy including Sweetwater on the Sturt Creek and Wan.gu (or Wungu) near Old Flora Valley (Tsunoda 1981: xvi, 6-7). This study examines the nature of the interaction between the explorers, the colonising pastoralists and the traditional owners, the Nyininy.
  • South East Queensland's Rail Horizon Foreword

    South East Queensland's Rail Horizon Foreword

    Department of Transport and Main Roads South East Queensland's Rail Horizon Foreword The Queensland Government is All levels of government must work We will roll out 75 new generation committed to revitalising and together to fund critical infrastructure six-car trains from late 2016 to transforming the South East projects such as Cross River Rail. We boost the number of trains by 30 per must deliver the right projects at the Queensland (SEQ) rail network cent, and timetable and signalling right time to ensure efficient use of so it can meet the challenges improvements will improve capacity public funds. and access by allowing more trains of a growing population and to move more quickly through the provide customers a high Investment in the rail network network. A taskforce is reviewing fare performing rail service. will give people better access to structures to improve affordability their places of work and connect and introducing practical measures Delivering an accessible, safe businesses and communities. It will to make public transport more and reliable transport system in support our economic growth and accessible for everyone. Queensland is a priority. By 2036, the generate jobs. population of SEQ is forecast to reach As demand continues to grow, there around 4.9 million people, placing South East Queensland’s (SEQ's) will come a time when new inner- increasing pressure on our transport Rail Horizon highlights the need for city capacity is needed. By around system, particularly in growth a better rail system to keep pace 2021 there will not be any capacity corridors and where the system with growth and provide a better to increase services on parts of converges in the Brisbane CBD.