Mammalia, Cetacea) of Pakistan: Locomotion and Habitat in the Initial Stages of Whale Evolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mammalia, Cetacea) of Pakistan: Locomotion and Habitat in the Initial Stages of Whale Evolution PalZ (2017) 91:601–627 DOI 10.1007/s12542-017-0362-8 RESEARCH PAPER Astragali of Pakicetidae and other early-to-middle Eocene archaeocetes (Mammalia, Cetacea) of Pakistan: locomotion and habitat in the initial stages of whale evolution 1 2 3 4 Philip D. Gingerich • Kurt Heissig • Ryan M. Bebej • Wighart von Koenigswald Received: 6 December 2016 / Accepted: 26 May 2017 / Published online: 28 June 2017 Ó Pala¨ontologische Gesellschaft 2017 Abstract Richard Dehm and colleagues of the Bayerische archaeocete taxa based on teeth. Multivariate morphomet- Staatssammlung fu¨r Pala¨ontologie und Geologie in Munich ric comparison (Auto3Dgm) shows that pakicetid astragali made an important collection of early-to-middle Eocene overlap almost completely in shape with those of early mammals at Ganda Kas in Pakistan during the winter of artiodactyls. Middle Eocene protocetid astragali are 1955/56. The genera and species Ichthyolestes pinfoldi and divergent from both. Retention of an astragalus indistin- Gandakasia potens were named from this collection. Both guishable from that of artiodactyls shows that pakicetids are now recognized as early and primitive archaeocete are closely related to artiodactyls phylogenetically, but cetaceans. In addition, Dehm’s group collected 16 com- does not make Ichthyolestes and Pakicetus terrestrial or plete or partial astragali of archaeocetes that were cursorial. Other skeletal elements and bone microstructure misidentified as artiodactyls. These bring the total number indicate that pakicetids were semiaquatic like later proto- of archaeocete astragali known from Ganda Kas to 28. cetids. Tropical riverine and marginal marine facies of the They separate clearly into four species distinguished by Kuldana Formation are likely habitats for initial stages of size: from smallest to largest Ichthyolestes pinfoldi Dehm the transition from terrestrial artiodactyls to semiaquatic and Oettingen-Spielberg, Pakicetus attocki (West), Gan- and fully aquatic archaeocetes. dakasia potens Dehm and Oettingen-Spielberg, and Am- bulocetus natans Thewissen et al. Ganda Kas artiodactyls Keywords Eocene Á Artiodactyla Á Cetacea Á Astragalus Á are smaller and rare in comparison. Ichthyolestes and Pa- Semiaquatic locomotion Á Transition from land to sea kicetus are pakicetid archaeocetes, Gandakasia is presently indeterminate to family, and Ambulocetus is an ambulo- Kurzfassung Richard Dehm machte mit Kollegen der cetid. Tooth size and astragalus size are highly correlated, Bayerischen Staatsammlung fu¨r Pala¨ontologie und corroborating reference of astragali to the first three Geologie Mu¨nchen im Winter 1955/56 bedeutende Aufsammlungen von Wirbeltierfossilien aus dem Handling editor: Thomas Mo¨rs. Unter- bis Mittel-Eoza¨n von Ganda Kas in Pakistan. Die Gattungen und Arten Ichthyolestes pinfordi und & Philip D. Gingerich Gandakasia potens beruhen u. a. auf diesem Material. [email protected] Beide werden jetzt als fru¨he und primitive Archaeoceten angesehen. Die Dehm-Gruppe sammelte daru¨ber hinaus 16 1 Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA vollsta¨ndige Astragali von Archaeoceten, die seinerzeit den Paarhufern zugeordnet wurden. Somit bela¨uft sich jetzt die 2 Bayerische Staatssammlung fu¨r Pala¨ontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 Munich, Germany Zahl der Astragali von Archaeoceten von Ganda Kas auf 28. Diese lassen sich aufgrund ihrer Gro¨ße den 3 Department of Biology, Calvin College, 1726 Knollcrest Circle SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546-4403, USA nachfolgenden vier Arten (in aufsteigender Gro¨ße) zuordnen: Ichthyolestes pinfoldi Dehm und 4 Steinmann-Institut fu¨r Geologie, Mineralogie und Pala¨ontologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universita¨t Oettingen-Spielberg, Pakicetus attocki (West), Gandakasia Bonn, Nussallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany potens Dehm und Oettingen-Spielberg sowie Ambulocetus 123 602 P. D. Gingerich et al. natans Thewissen et al. Die Artiodactyla aus Ganda Kas astragalus with a deep proximal pulley or trochlea and a sind im Vergleich dazu kleiner und seltener. Die shallower distal trochlea (see below). These diagnostic Archaeoceten Ichthyolestes und Pakicetus sind features are also present in the astragalus of early Pakicetidae, Gandakasia kann zurzeit noch keiner Familie archaeocetes. The deep proximal and distal trochleae and zugeordnet werden; Ambulocetus repra¨sentiert die the parallel medial and lateral tori of the former permit Ambulocetidae. Da die Gro¨ße der Za¨hne und die der dorsoventral flexion of the astragalus and foot relative to Astragali sehr gut korrelieren, besta¨tigt sich die Zuordnung the tibia and lower leg, but preclude mediolateral rotation der Astragali zu den ersten drei Taxa, die aufgrund der and pivoting that would be detrimental in the cursorial Za¨hne unterschieden wurden. Ein multivariater locomotion of artiodactyls (Schaeffer 1947). morphometrischer Vergleich (Auto3Dgm) zeigt, dass sich Whales were long thought to have evolved from general- die Astragali der Pakicetidae in der Gestalt fast vollsta¨ndig ized Paleocene-epoch mesonychian condylarths (Van Valen mit denen der fru¨hen Artiodactyla decken. Die Astragali 1966, 1968). However, discovery of skeletons of the early der mitteleoza¨nen Protocetidae unterscheiden sich aber von whales Artiocetus and Rodhocetus with associated artiodactyl beiden. Die Beibehaltung eines Astragalus, der von dem astragali showed that whales evolved from Eocene Artio- der Artiodactyla nicht unterscheidbar ist, zeigt dass die dactyla and not from Mesonychia (Gingerich et al. 2001b). Pakicetiden mit den Artiodactylen in einem engen This corroborated molecular evidence that Cetacea are phy- phylogenetischen Bezug stehen. Daraus folgt aber nicht, logenetically nested within Artiodactyla in a clade sometimes dass Ichthyolestes und Pakicetus terrestrisch lebten und called Cetartiodactyla (Montgelard et al. 1997). vorwiegend La¨ufer waren. Andere Skelettelemente und die We regard the traditional mammalian orders Cetacea Mikrostruktur der Knochen zeigen, dass diese Pakicetiden and Artiodactyla as distinct taxa of equal rank to ebenso semiaquatisch waren, wie die ju¨ngeren acknowledge that one major group of mammals united by Protocetidae. Die Fazies tropischer Flussmu¨ndungen und similarity (Cetacea) can, and did, evolve from another such die randlichen marinen Bereiche, die in der group (Artiodactyla). Systematists emphasizing holophyly Kuldana-Formation belegt sind, bilden den Lebensraum fu¨r in classification over monophyly in evolution are free to einen beginnenden U¨ bergang von terrestrischen group Cetacea with Non-Cetacean-Artiodactyla in an order Artiodactylen u¨ber semiaquatische Formen zu den voll Artiodactya, or Cetacea with Non-Cetacean-Cetartio- aquatischen Archaeoceten. dactyla in an order Cetartiodactyla. In this case our use of ‘Artiodactyla’ (and informal ‘artiodactyl’) can be regarded Schlu¨sselwo¨rter Eoza¨n Á Artiodactyla Á Cetacea Á as a shorthand equivalent of ‘Non-Cetacean-Artiodactyla’ Astragalus Á semiaquatische Fortbewegung Á U¨ bergang or ‘Non-Cetacean-Cetartiodactyla.’ vom Land zum Meer Study of locomotion in the initial stages of whale evo- lution is timely for comparing two contrasting narratives: (1) the early-to-middle Eocene archaeocetes Ichthyolestes Introduction and Pakicetus (Pakicetidae) were cursorial and terrestrial like their artiodactyl ancestors—implying that aquatic Whales are marine mammals that evolved from land-mam- adaptation originated after the origin of Cetacea (Thewis- mal ancestors in one of the major evolutionary transitions sen et al. 2001b; Fish 2016); or (2) early-to-middle Eocene documented in the fossil record. This transition affected the Ichthyolestes and Pakicetus were already semiaquatic, and form and function of many anatomical and physiological cetaceans originated from an unknown early Eocene ter- systems. The locomotor complex is one of the transitioning restrial or semiaquatic artiodactyl similar to Elomeryx systems most accessible for study in the fossil record. Here, (Gingerich et al. 2001b; Gingerich 2003a, 2005)orIndo- we focus on the form and function of a key skeletal element, hyus (Thewissen et al. 2007; Cooper et al. 2011)—imply- the astragalus, during the initial stages of whale evolution. ing that aquatic adaptation took place before or during the The astragalus is the bone in each mammalian ankle, left and origin of Cetacea. right, that forms an articular surface permitting flexion and extension of the foot relative to the lower leg. Astragali are present in archaic whales (Archaeoceti) that retained feet, History of study but astragali are no longer present in living toothed whales (Odontoceti) and baleen whales (Mysticeti) that lack exter- This study started, in some sense, when Arthur Wynne nal hind limbs and feet. (1877) first reported fragmentary Eocene mammals from The astragalus in mammals is often distinctly shaped sites near Fatehjang in the Kala Chitta Range of Punjab. and diagnostic of taxonomic orders. For example, Artio- This region is now part of Pakistan, and the bones came dactyla (cows, sheep, deer, etc.) have a ‘double-pulley’ from strata variously referred to as the Kuldana series 123 Astragali of Pakicetidae and other Eocene archaeocetes of Pakistan 603 (Wynne 1874; Middlemiss 1896), upper nummulitic group the group was able to make a substantial collection of (Wynne 1877), ‘nummulitics’ (Lydekker 1880), lower middle Eocene specimens. The mammalian dental remains Chharat series (Pinfold
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • New Postcranial Specimens of the Anthracotheriidae (Mammalia; Artiodactyla) from the Paleogene of Fayum Depression, Egypt
    International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) - Volume-1, Issue-8,November 2015 ISSN: 2395-3470 www.ijseas.com New postcranial specimens of the Anthracotheriidae (Mammalia; Artiodactyla) from the Paleogene of Fayum Depression, Egypt 1 2 Afifi H. Sileem , Abdel Galil A Hewaidy 1 Vertebrate paleontology section, Cairo Geological Museum, Cairo, Egypt, [email protected] 2Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Egypt, <[email protected]> Abstract: The fossiliferous deposits exposed north of Birket Qarun in the Fayum Depression, northeast Egypt, have produced a remarkable collection of fossil mammals from localities that range in age from earliest late Eocene (~37 Ma) to latest early Oligocene (~29 Ma). Anthracotheriidae are among the most common mammals that are preserved in these deposits. Here we describe a new fossil specimens of the Anthracotheriidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) discovered in the Jebel Qatrani Formation of Fayum. The specimens consist of a seven astragalus, which is referable to Bothriogenys sp. from the formation. The specimens Bothriogenys sp. show a higher degree of size variation and some feature suggest that the anthracothere are not closely related to Hippopotamus. Key word: anthracothere, Bothriogenys; astragalus; Fayum; Early Oligocene. 376 International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) - Volume-1, Issue-8,November 2015 ISSN: 2395-3470 www.ijseas.com Introduction: The fossiliferous sedimentary deposits exposed north of Birket (lake) Qarun in the Fayum Depression (Fig.1), northeast Egypt, have produced a remarkable collection of a wide variety of fish, amphibian, reptile, bird and mammal taxa (e.g. Andrews, 1906; Simons and Rasmussen, 1990; Murray et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The World at the Time of Messel: Conference Volume
    T. Lehmann & S.F.K. Schaal (eds) The World at the Time of Messel - Conference Volume Time at the The World The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 2011 Frankfurt am Main, 15th - 19th November 2011 ISBN 978-3-929907-86-5 Conference Volume SENCKENBERG Gesellschaft für Naturforschung THOMAS LEHMANN & STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL (eds) The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference Frankfurt am Main, 15th – 19th November 2011 Conference Volume Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung IMPRINT The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Conference Volume Publisher PROF. DR. DR. H.C. VOLKER MOSBRUGGER Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Editors DR. THOMAS LEHMANN & DR. STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected]; [email protected] Language editors JOSEPH E.B. HOGAN & DR. KRISTER T. SMITH Layout JULIANE EBERHARDT & ANIKA VOGEL Cover Illustration EVELINE JUNQUEIRA Print Rhein-Main-Geschäftsdrucke, Hofheim-Wallau, Germany Citation LEHMANN, T. & SCHAAL, S.F.K. (eds) (2011). The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates. 22nd International Senckenberg Conference. 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main. Conference Volume. Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main. pp. 203.
    [Show full text]
  • Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla (Mammalia) from the Early-Middle Eocene Kuldana Formation of Kohat (Pakistan)
    CO"uTK1BL 11015 FKOLI IHt \lC5tLL1 OF I' ALEO\ IOLOG1 THE UNIVERSITY OF IVICHIGAN VOI 77 Lo 10 p 717-37.1 October 33 1987 ARTIODACTYLA AND PERISSODACTYLA (MAMMALIA) FROM THE EARLY-MIDDLE EOCENE KULDANA FORMATION OF KOHAT (PAKISTAN) BY J. G. M. THEWISSEN. P. D. GINGERICH and D. E. RUSSELL MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Charles B. Beck, Director Jennifer A. Kitchell, Editor This series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for publication of papers based chiefly on collections in the Museum. When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page and a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the mailing list, and to individuals upon request. A list of the separate issues may also be obtained by request. Correspond- ence should be directed to the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. VOLS. II-XXVII. Parts of volumes may be obtained if available. Price lists are available upon inquiry. I ARTIODACTI L .-I A\D PERISSODACTYL4 (kl.iihlhlAL1A) FROM THE EARLY-h1IDDLE EOCEUE KCLD..I\4 FORMATIO\ OF KOHAT (PAKISTAY) J. G. M. THEWISSEN. P. D. GINGERICH AND D. E. RUSSELL Ah.strcict.-Chorlakki. yielding approximately 400 specimens (mostly isolated teeth and bone fragments). is one of four major early-to-middle Eocene niammal localities on the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent. On the basis of ung~~latesclescribed in this paper we consider the Chorlakki fauna to be younger than that from Barbora Banda.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Middle Eocene Protocetid Whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and Associated Biota from Georgia Author(S): Richard C
    A New Middle Eocene Protocetid Whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and Associated Biota from Georgia Author(s): Richard C. Hulbert, Jr., Richard M. Petkewich, Gale A. Bishop, David Bukry and David P. Aleshire Source: Journal of Paleontology , Sep., 1998, Vol. 72, No. 5 (Sep., 1998), pp. 907-927 Published by: Paleontological Society Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1306667 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1306667?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology and are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Paleontology This content downloaded from 131.204.154.192 on Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:43:05 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms J. Paleont., 72(5), 1998, pp. 907-927 Copyright ? 1998, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/98/0072-0907$03.00 A NEW MIDDLE EOCENE PROTOCETID WHALE (MAMMALIA: CETACEA: ARCHAEOCETI) AND ASSOCIATED BIOTA FROM GEORGIA RICHARD C. HULBERT, JR.,1 RICHARD M. PETKEWICH,"4 GALE A.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of Manuscript and Figures
    The triple origin of whales DAVID PETERS Independent Researcher 311 Collinsville Avenue, Collinsville, IL 62234, USA [email protected] 314-323-7776 July 13, 2018 RH: PETERS—TRIPLE ORIGIN OF WHALES Keywords: Cetacea, Mysticeti, Odontoceti, Phylogenetic analyis ABSTRACT—Workers presume the traditional whale clade, Cetacea, is monophyletic when they support a hypothesis of relationships for baleen whales (Mysticeti) rooted on stem members of the toothed whale clade (Odontoceti). Here a wider gamut phylogenetic analysis recovers Archaeoceti + Odontoceti far apart from Mysticeti and right whales apart from other mysticetes. The three whale clades had semi-aquatic ancestors with four limbs. The clade Odontoceti arises from a lineage that includes archaeocetids, pakicetids, tenrecs, elephant shrews and anagalids: all predators. The clade Mysticeti arises from a lineage that includes desmostylians, anthracobunids, cambaytheres, hippos and mesonychids: none predators. Right whales are derived from a sister to Desmostylus. Other mysticetes arise from a sister to the RBCM specimen attributed to Behemotops. Basal mysticetes include Caperea (for right whales) and Miocaperea (for all other mysticetes). Cetotheres are not related to aetiocetids. Whales and hippos are not related to artiodactyls. Rather the artiodactyl-type ankle found in basal archaeocetes is also found in the tenrec/odontocete clade. Former mesonychids, Sinonyx and Andrewsarchus, nest close to tenrecs. These are novel observations and hypotheses of mammal interrelationships based on morphology and a wide gamut taxon list that includes relevant taxa that prior studies ignored. Here some taxa are tested together for the first time, so they nest together for the first time. INTRODUCTION Marx and Fordyce (2015) reported the genesis of the baleen whale clade (Mysticeti) extended back to Zygorhiza, Physeter and other toothed whales (Archaeoceti + Odontoceti).
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Analysis of Marine Mammal Dispersal Routes Across Major Ocean Regions Using Beta Diversity at the Generic Level
    A Statistical Analysis of Marine Mammal Dispersal Routes Across Major Ocean Regions Using Beta Diversity at the Generic Level A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at George Mason University By Carlos Mauricio Peredo Bachelor of Science Seton Hill University, 2012 Director: Mark D. Uhen, Assistant Professor Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth Sciences Spring Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright 2015 Carlos Mauricio Peredo All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION Dedicated to my wonderful parents, Mauricio and Julie Peredo, who left behind everything they knew and started fresh in a foreign land purely in the pursuit of a better life for their children; to my older brother Miguel, whose witty humor, eternal optimism, and fierce loyalty has kept my head above water and a smile on my face throughout countless tribulations; to my younger brother Julio, who has far surpassed us all in talent and intellect, and who inspires me to never stop learning; and most of all, to my loving wife Molly, who has never stopped believing in me and drives me to settle for nothing less than perfection. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members, Drs. George, Lyons, and Parsons, for their tireless revisions and hard work on my behalf. I would like to thank George Mason University and the Smithsonian Institution for providing the support and inspiration for much of this project. I would like to thank the Paleobiology Database, and all of its contributors, for their ambitious vision and their relentless pursuit of its execution.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Beyond
    EVOLUTION ORIGIN ANDBEYOND Gould, who alerted him to the fact the Galapagos finches ORIGIN AND BEYOND were distinct but closely related species. Darwin investigated ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE (1823–1913) the breeding and artificial selection of domesticated animals, and learned about species, time, and the fossil record from despite the inspiration and wealth of data he had gathered during his years aboard the Alfred Russel Wallace was a school teacher and naturalist who gave up teaching the anatomist Richard Owen, who had worked on many of to earn his living as a professional collector of exotic plants and animals from beagle, darwin took many years to formulate his theory and ready it for publication – Darwin’s vertebrate specimens and, in 1842, had “invented” the tropics. He collected extensively in South America, and from 1854 in the so long, in fact, that he was almost beaten to publication. nevertheless, when it dinosaurs as a separate category of reptiles. islands of the Malay archipelago. From these experiences, Wallace realized By 1842, Darwin’s evolutionary ideas were sufficiently emerged, darwin’s work had a profound effect. that species exist in variant advanced for him to produce a 35-page sketch and, by forms and that changes in 1844, a 250-page synthesis, a copy of which he sent in 1847 the environment could lead During a long life, Charles After his five-year round the world voyage, Darwin arrived Darwin saw himself largely as a geologist, and published to the botanist, Joseph Dalton Hooker. This trusted friend to the loss of any ill-adapted Darwin wrote numerous back at the family home in Shrewsbury on 5 October 1836.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology
    Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology by Paul David Polly B.A. (University of Texas at Austin) 1987 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Paleontology in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA at BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor William A. Clemens, Chair Professor Kevin Padian Professor James L. Patton Professor F. Clark Howell 1993 Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology © 1993 by Paul David Polly To P. Reid Hamilton, in memory. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ix Acknowledgments xi Chapter One--Revolution and Evolution in Taxonomy: Mammalian Classification Before and After Darwin 1 Introduction 2 The Beginning of Modern Taxonomy: Linnaeus and his Predecessors 5 Cuvier's Classification 10 Owen's Classification 18 Post-Darwinian Taxonomy: Revolution and Evolution in Classification 24 Kovalevskii's Classification 25 Huxley's Classification 28 Cope's Classification 33 Early 20th Century Taxonomy 42 Simpson and the Evolutionary Synthesis 46 A Box Model of Classification 48 The Content of Simpson's 1945 Classification 50 Conclusion 52 Acknowledgments 56 Bibliography 56 Figures 69 Chapter Two: Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) from the Early Eocene Four Mile Fauna and Their Biostratigraphic Implications 78 Abstract 79 Introduction 79 Materials and Methods 80 iv Systematic Paleontology 80 The Four Mile Fauna and Wasatchian Biostratigraphic Zonation 84 Conclusion 86 Acknowledgments 86 Bibliography 86 Figures 87 Chapter Three: A New Genus Eurotherium (Creodonta, Mammalia) in Reference to Taxonomic Problems with Some Eocene Hyaenodontids from Eurasia (With B. Lange-Badré) 89 Résumé 90 Abstract 90 Version française abrégéé 90 Introduction 93 Acknowledgments 96 Bibliography 96 Table 3.1: Original and Current Usages of Genera and Species 99 Table 3.2: Species Currently Included in Genera Discussed in Text 101 Chapter Four: The skeleton of Gazinocyon vulpeculus n.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes
    Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes by Ryan Matthew Bebej A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Philip D. Gingerich, Co-Chair Professor Philip Myers, Co-Chair Professor Daniel C. Fisher Professor Paul W. Webb © Ryan Matthew Bebej 2011 To my wonderful wife Melissa, for her infinite love and support ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank each of my committee members. I will be forever grateful to my primary mentor, Philip D. Gingerich, for providing me the opportunity of a lifetime, studying the very organisms that sparked my interest in evolution and paleontology in the first place. His encouragement, patience, instruction, and advice have been instrumental in my development as a scholar, and his dedication to his craft has instilled in me the importance of doing careful and solid research. I am extremely grateful to Philip Myers, who graciously consented to be my co-advisor and co-chair early in my career and guided me through some of the most stressful aspects of life as a Ph.D. student (e.g., preliminary examinations). I also thank Paul W. Webb, for his novel thoughts about living in and moving through water, and Daniel C. Fisher, for his insights into functional morphology, 3D modeling, and mammalian paleobiology. My research was almost entirely predicated on cetacean fossils collected through a collaboration of the University of Michigan and the Geological Survey of Pakistan before my arrival in Ann Arbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Thewissen Et Al. Reply Replying To: J
    NATURE | Vol 458 | 19 March 2009 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS ARISING Hippopotamus and whale phylogeny Arising from: J. G. M. Thewissen, L. N. Cooper, M. T. Clementz, S. Bajpai & B. N. Tiwari Nature 450, 1190–1194 (2007) Thewissen etal.1 describe new fossils from India that apparentlysupport fossils, Raoellidae or the raoellid Indohyus is more closely related to a phylogeny that places Cetacea (that is, whales, dolphins, porpoises) as Cetacea than is Hippopotamidae (Fig. 1). Hippopotamidae is the the sister group to the extinct family Raoellidae, and Hippopotamidae exclusive sister group to Cetacea plus Raoellidae in the analysis that as more closely related to pigs and peccaries (that is, Suina) than to down-weights homoplastic characters, althoughin the equallyweighted cetaceans. However, our reanalysis of a modified version of the data set analysis, another topology was equally parsimonious. In that topology, they used2 differs in retaining molecular characters and demonstrates Hippopotamidae moved one node out, being the sister group to an that Hippopotamidae is the closest extant family to Cetacea and that Andrewsarchus, Raoellidae and Cetacea clade. In neither analysis is raoellids are the closest extinct group, consistent with previous phylo- Hippopotamidae closer to the pigs and peccaries than to Cetacea, the genetic studies2,3. This topology supports the view that the aquatic result obtained by Thewissen et al.1. In all our analyses, pachyostosis adaptations in hippopotamids and cetaceans are inherited from their (thickening) of limb bones and bottom walking, which occur in hippo- common ancestor4. potamids9,10, are interpreted to have evolved before the pachyostosis of To conduct our analyses, we started with the same published matrix the auditory bulla, as seen in raoellids and cetaceans1.
    [Show full text]