Chapter 26 Cenozoic Life

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 26 Cenozoic Life 236 Chapter 26 Cenozoic Life GUIDED STUDY The text chapter should be studied one section at a time. Life on Land (pp. 552-560) Before you read, preview each section by skimming it, noting headings and boldface items. Then read the 5. Describe the adaptations of grasses and herbaceous appropriate section objectives from the following plants that caused their spectacular radiation in the outline. Keep these objectives in mind and, as you read Cenozoic. the chapter section, search for the information that will enable you to meet each objective. Once you have finished a section, write out answers for its objectives. Cenozoic Marine Life (pp. 550-552) 1. List examples of major invertebrate groups that were missing from Cenozoic seas. 6. Discuss the diversification of birds in the Cenozoic, and the dominant roles they played. 2. Describe the diversification of foraminifera during the early Cenozoic. 7. Marsupial mammals developed in both South America and Australia. Why did those in South America suffer greatly from extinction in the Pliocene Epoch, but those in Australia have survived untouched until modern times? 3. Which marine invertebrates seemed little affected by the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event? 8. Describe the different stages in the development of the modern horse. What features underwent the most change, and why? 4. Describe the various forms that led to the evolution of whales from original land-based predators. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 237 Quaternary Extinctions (pp. 560-562) CHAPTER REVIEW 9. Describe the kinds of animals, both mammal and When you have finished reading the chapter, work bird, that were lost in the late Quaternary extinction through the material that follows to review it. Complete event. the sentences. As you proceed, evaluate your performance for each section by consulting the answers on page 245. Do not continue with the next section until you understand each answer. If you need to, review or reread the appropriate section in the textbook before continuing. 10. Describe how an abrupt climate change at the end of the Pleistocene could have been fatal to the large Introduction (p. 549) animal population at that time. 1. Fossils of creatures that lived in and around large lakes in what is now Utah, Wyoming, and Colorado during the Eocene Epoch are preserved in rocks of the _______ _______ ____________. Human Origins (pp. 562-569) 2. The warm, tropical climate of the region was 11. Describe the features that characterize primates. indicated by the presence of fossilized ______ trees What advantages do these features offer? and ferns. 3. The abundance of fossil ______ skeletons in these layers indicate a poisonous overturning of oxygen- rich surface waters with oxygen-poor bottom waters, causing massive kills. Cenozoic Marine Life (pp. 550-552) 12. List several differences between the two major groups of primates. 4. The mass extinctions at the end of the ___________ Era included all of the large marine __________, and the ammonoid cephalopods and rudistid bivalves. 5. ___________ diversified quite rapidly in the early 13. Describe the fundamental structural differences between modern humans and apes. Cenozoic, with ________ forms reaching the size of a five-cent piece. 6. ___________ seemed to have flourished with the increase of volcanism during the Miocene Epoch, when increased volcanism loaded the waters with 14. What are the most significant features of the silica from which their tests were built. recently discovered Australopithecus garhi? 7. With the extinction of the reef-building rudistid bivalves, the __________ ______ reclaimed their role by the Oligocene Epoch. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 238 8. ____________ were little affected by the 19. The demise of the ___________ opened the way for Cretaceous-Tertiary event, and are a main rapid diversification of both mammals and ______ component of temperate-water reefs today. in the Cenozoic. 9. ___________ and _________ quickly reestablished 20. Despite the prominence of gymnosperms and many their dominance in the shallow marine environment, seedless vascular plants in some environments with the rapid appearance of many modern forms. today, it is the continued expansion of the 10. Their chief new adaptation was to inhabit the ____________ that highlights Cenozoic plant ___________ shallow marine environments. evolution. 11. The cephalopods were severely impacted by 21. The cooler and drier climate of the Miocene Epoch extinctions, with only a single genus of favored the expansion of ________, which had ____________ surviving. adapted to the grazing habits of mammals. The 12. Echinoids such as the familiar______ ________, physical toughness of these plants comes from their evolved to take advantage of the sandy, shallow incorporation of ________ into the cell structure. marine environment. 22. Colonization of spaces made vacant by flood or fire 13. The ammonoid predators of the Mesozoic were was a special adaptation of the __________ plants, replaced in the Cenozoic by modern fish called which also underwent a spectacular radiation in the _______, which have symmetrical fins, round later Cenozoic. scales, and short jaws. 23. Today, the surviving reptiles are mostly _________, 14. Larger marine predators such as ___________ which include crocodiles, lizards, and snakes. The evolved during the Tertiary Period, with one form only other surviving reptile group was the reaching nearly 40 feet in length. __________. 15. The largest marine predators of the Cenozoic were 24. By the end of the Mesozoic, the modern design of the _________, as they are today. They seem to birds with a ____________ beak, hollow ________, have evolved from wolf-sized, hoofed ancestors and the absence of a reptilian tail was established. that were adapted to an aquatic environment. 25. In the Early Tertiary Period, scavenging birds such 16. The earliest whale ancestors had functional hind as vultures and large__________ forms appeared. limbs and have been found in ______ _________, Some of the later carnivorous forms stood 2 meters but later forms retain only _______ of these limbs, tall and were probably the dominant _________ of and appear to be adapted to a fully aquatic the time. existence. 26. In isolated locations such as Madagascar and New 17. Most whales today are________ forms, but by the Zealand, giant flightless birds survived until the Miocene, the larger __________ whales appeared, Pleistocene, when __________with mammals and which include today the largest animals that have hunting by humans _______ them to extinction. ever lived on Earth. 27. Because of the long presence of the dinosaurs, _______________ of mammals was relatively slow Life on Land (pp. 552-560) before the start of the Cenozoic Era. 18. The evolution of __________on land far 28. In the early Paleocene Epoch, only about a ______ outdistanced diversification in the oceans. families of mammals existed. By the early Eocene epoch, there were already _______ families present. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 239 29. The early mammals were very small and their 38. Flesh-eating placental mammals are called fossils are quite scarce. Fortunately, their _____________. They form the most diverse and _________ and _____ structures are very complex of all mammalian orders, and are distinctive, and can be used for identification. characterized by specialized teeth, and keen senses 30. There are five subclasses of mammals. One of the of sight and ________. These mammals can be two subclasses that arose in the Mesozoic and divided into three groups or superfamilies became extinct in the early Cenozoic was the 39. The group containing cats, civets, and hyenas is ___________. called the _________. Dogs, bears, racoons, and 31. The most primitive of the three mammal subclasses weasels belong to the _______ group. The marine present today are the _______________, which lay group is called the ___________, and includes eggs and nurse their young. They can be traced seals, sea lions, and walruses. back to Cretaceous fossils. 40. Mammals having hoofed feet are called 32. The group of mammals in which the embryo ___________. Horses, rhinoceroses, and tapirs are hatches in the uterus and continues its development classified as being _________, or perissodactyls. there are called ________________. Deer, giraffes, bison, pigs, and hippopotamuses as 33. __________ has been a factor in the evolution of are classified as being _________, or artiodactyls. this mammalian group, for in areas such as South 41. The competitive success of the artiodactyls against America, where landbridges suddenly forced these their perissodactyl neighbors may have come by animals into direct competition with more advanced their development of a multi-chambered stomach, mammal groups, they eventually became which gave these ___________ an advantage in _________. In areas such as Australia, they have more efficient digestion. flourished in the absence of outside competition, 42. The largest land animals alive today evolved from until only recently. hoofed ancestors, and are recognized by their long 34. _________ mammals have the most advanced trunks or modified noses. These _______________ system of reproduction. They evolved from gave rise to the mammoths, mastodons, and modern marsupial ancestors during the Cretaceous Period elephants. and quickly became widespread. Quaternary Extinctions (pp. 560-562) 35. The first mammals of this most advanced
Recommended publications
  • New Materials of Chalicotherium Brevirostris (Perissodactyla, Chalicotheriidae)
    Geobios 45 (2012) 369–376 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Original article New materials of Chalicotherium brevirostris (Perissodactyla, Chalicotheriidae) § from the Tunggur Formation, Inner Mongolia Yan Liu *, Zhaoqun Zhang Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrate, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 142, Xizhimenwai Street, PO Box 643, Beijing 100044, PR China A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Chalicotherium brevirostris was named by Colbert based on a skull lacking mandibles from the late Middle Received 23 March 2011 Miocene Tunggur Formation, Tunggur, Inner Mongolia, China. Here we describe new mandibular Accepted 6 October 2011 materials collected from the same area. In contrast to previous expectations, the new mandibular Available online 14 July 2012 materials show a long snout, long diastema, a three lower incisors and a canine. C. brevirostris shows some sexual dimorphism and intraspecific variation in morphologic characters. The new materials differ Keywords: from previously described C. cf. brevirostris from Cixian County (Hebei Province) and the Tsaidam Basin, Tunggur which may represent a different, new species close to C. brevirostris. The diagnosis of C. brevirostris is Middle Miocene revised. Chalicotheriinae Chalicotherium ß 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. 1. Abbreviations progress in understanding the Tunggur geology and paleontology (Qiu et al., 1988). The most important result of this expedition so far is
    [Show full text]
  • A New Middle Eocene Protocetid Whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and Associated Biota from Georgia Author(S): Richard C
    A New Middle Eocene Protocetid Whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and Associated Biota from Georgia Author(s): Richard C. Hulbert, Jr., Richard M. Petkewich, Gale A. Bishop, David Bukry and David P. Aleshire Source: Journal of Paleontology , Sep., 1998, Vol. 72, No. 5 (Sep., 1998), pp. 907-927 Published by: Paleontological Society Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1306667 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1306667?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology and are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Paleontology This content downloaded from 131.204.154.192 on Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:43:05 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms J. Paleont., 72(5), 1998, pp. 907-927 Copyright ? 1998, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/98/0072-0907$03.00 A NEW MIDDLE EOCENE PROTOCETID WHALE (MAMMALIA: CETACEA: ARCHAEOCETI) AND ASSOCIATED BIOTA FROM GEORGIA RICHARD C. HULBERT, JR.,1 RICHARD M. PETKEWICH,"4 GALE A.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes
    Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes by Ryan Matthew Bebej A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Philip D. Gingerich, Co-Chair Professor Philip Myers, Co-Chair Professor Daniel C. Fisher Professor Paul W. Webb © Ryan Matthew Bebej 2011 To my wonderful wife Melissa, for her infinite love and support ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank each of my committee members. I will be forever grateful to my primary mentor, Philip D. Gingerich, for providing me the opportunity of a lifetime, studying the very organisms that sparked my interest in evolution and paleontology in the first place. His encouragement, patience, instruction, and advice have been instrumental in my development as a scholar, and his dedication to his craft has instilled in me the importance of doing careful and solid research. I am extremely grateful to Philip Myers, who graciously consented to be my co-advisor and co-chair early in my career and guided me through some of the most stressful aspects of life as a Ph.D. student (e.g., preliminary examinations). I also thank Paul W. Webb, for his novel thoughts about living in and moving through water, and Daniel C. Fisher, for his insights into functional morphology, 3D modeling, and mammalian paleobiology. My research was almost entirely predicated on cetacean fossils collected through a collaboration of the University of Michigan and the Geological Survey of Pakistan before my arrival in Ann Arbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Thewissen Et Al. Reply Replying To: J
    NATURE | Vol 458 | 19 March 2009 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS ARISING Hippopotamus and whale phylogeny Arising from: J. G. M. Thewissen, L. N. Cooper, M. T. Clementz, S. Bajpai & B. N. Tiwari Nature 450, 1190–1194 (2007) Thewissen etal.1 describe new fossils from India that apparentlysupport fossils, Raoellidae or the raoellid Indohyus is more closely related to a phylogeny that places Cetacea (that is, whales, dolphins, porpoises) as Cetacea than is Hippopotamidae (Fig. 1). Hippopotamidae is the the sister group to the extinct family Raoellidae, and Hippopotamidae exclusive sister group to Cetacea plus Raoellidae in the analysis that as more closely related to pigs and peccaries (that is, Suina) than to down-weights homoplastic characters, althoughin the equallyweighted cetaceans. However, our reanalysis of a modified version of the data set analysis, another topology was equally parsimonious. In that topology, they used2 differs in retaining molecular characters and demonstrates Hippopotamidae moved one node out, being the sister group to an that Hippopotamidae is the closest extant family to Cetacea and that Andrewsarchus, Raoellidae and Cetacea clade. In neither analysis is raoellids are the closest extinct group, consistent with previous phylo- Hippopotamidae closer to the pigs and peccaries than to Cetacea, the genetic studies2,3. This topology supports the view that the aquatic result obtained by Thewissen et al.1. In all our analyses, pachyostosis adaptations in hippopotamids and cetaceans are inherited from their (thickening) of limb bones and bottom walking, which occur in hippo- common ancestor4. potamids9,10, are interpreted to have evolved before the pachyostosis of To conduct our analyses, we started with the same published matrix the auditory bulla, as seen in raoellids and cetaceans1.
    [Show full text]
  • LATE MIOCENE FISHES of the CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH and IDAHO By
    LATE MIOCENE FISHES OF THE CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH AND IDAHO by PATRICK H. MCCLELLAN AND GERALD R. SMITH MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 208 Ann Arbor, December 17, 2020 ISSN 0076-8405 P U B L I C A T I O N S O F T H E MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 208 GERALD SMITH, Editor The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series—the Miscellaneous Publications and the Occasional Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of these series. Beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and Circulars and each is sequentially numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum’s publications receive external peer review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, I nsects, Mollusks, and other topics is available.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Miocene Dome-Skulled Chalicothere
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3486, 45 pp., 26 ®gures, 8 tables October 27, 2005 An Early Miocene Dome-Skulled Chalicothere from the ``Arikaree'' Conglomerates of Darton: Calibrating the Ages of High Plains Paleovalleys Against Rocky Mountain Tectonism ROBERT M. HUNT, JR.1 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................... 2 Geologic Setting ................................................................ 3 Systematic Paleontology ........................................................ 12 Age of the Dome-Skulled Chalicothere ........................................... 28 The ``Arikaree'' Conglomerates of N.H. Darton ................................... 32 Post-Laramide Evolution of the Rocky Mountains ................................. 39 Acknowledgments ............................................................. 42 References .................................................................... 42 1 Department of Geosciences, W436 Nebraska Hall, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0549 ([email protected]). Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2005 ISSN 0003-0082 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3486 ABSTRACT Fragmentary skeletal remains discovered in 1979 in southeastern Wyoming, associated with a mammalian fauna of early Hemingfordian age (;18.2 to 18.8 Ma), represent the oldest known occurrence of dome-skulled chalicotheres
    [Show full text]
  • Agate Fossil Beds
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers National Park Service 1980 Agate Fossil Beds Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark "Agate Fossil Beds" (1980). U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers. 160. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark/160 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Park Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Agate Fossil Beds cap. tfs*Af Clemson Universit A *?* jfcti *JpRPP* - - - . Agate Fossil Beds Agate Fossil Beds National Monument Nebraska Produced by the Division of Publications National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 1980 — — The National Park Handbook Series National Park Handbooks, compact introductions to the great natural and historic places adminis- tered by the National Park Service, are designed to promote understanding and enjoyment of the parks. Each is intended to be informative reading and a useful guide before, during, and after a park visit. More than 100 titles are in print. This is Handbook 107. You may purchase the handbooks through the mail by writing to Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC 20402. About This Book What was life like in North America 21 million years ago? Agate Fossil Beds provides a glimpse of that time, long before the arrival of man, when now-extinct creatures roamed the land which we know today as Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Late Miocene of Thermopigi (Serres, N.Greece), and the Relationships of the Genus Denis Geraads, Nikolaï Spassov, Evangelia Tsoukala
    A skull of Ancylotherium (Chalicotheriidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Thermopigi (Serres, N.Greece), and the relationships of the genus Denis Geraads, Nikolaï Spassov, Evangelia Tsoukala To cite this version: Denis Geraads, Nikolaï Spassov, Evangelia Tsoukala. A skull of Ancylotherium (Chalicotheriidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Thermopigi (Serres, N.Greece), and the relationships of the genus. Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology, 2007, 27 (2), pp.461-466. halshs-00158253 HAL Id: halshs-00158253 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00158253 Submitted on 28 Jun 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A SKULL OF ANCYLOTHERIUM (CHALICOTHERIIDAE, MAMMALIA) FROM THE LATE MIOCENE OF THERMOPIGI (SERRES, N.GREECE), AND THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE GENUS DENIS GERAADS 1, EVANGELIA TSOUKALA 2 and NIKOLAÏ SPASSOV 3 1 UPR 2147 CNRS, 44 rue de l'Amiral Mouchez, 75014 Paris, France, [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 School of Geology, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece, [email protected] 3 National Museum of Natural History, Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd 1, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] RH: relationships of Ancylotherium 1 ABSTRACT The locality of Thermopigi in northern Greece has yielded a well- preserved skull of Ancylotherium pentelicum, among a rich collection of late Miocene mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyaenodonts and Carnivorans from the Early Oligocene to Early Miocene of Xianshuihe Formation, Lanzhou Basin, Gansu Province, China
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org HYAENODONTS AND CARNIVORANS FROM THE EARLY OLIGOCENE TO EARLY MIOCENE OF XIANSHUIHE FORMATION, LANZHOU BASIN, GANSU PROVINCE, CHINA Xiaoming Wang, Zhanxiang Qiu, and Banyue Wang ABSTRACT Fieldwork in the 1990s produced a few records of carnivorous mammals (cre- odonts and carnivorans) in the early Oligocene through early Miocene of Lanzhou Basin, Gansu Province, China. Although only five taxa are known so far, most repre- sented by fragmentary material, the new carnivore assemblage is unique and shows little resemblance to faunas elsewhere in eastern Asia. The early Oligocene record is represented by a single premolar of a Hyaenodon, referable to H. pervagus. In the early Miocene, a new species of Hyaenodon, H. weilini sp. nov., represented by sev- eral cheek teeth, is the last record of this genus in east Asia. A horizontal ramus of an amphicyonid, here identified as Ictiocyon cf. I. socialis, is the first record of this taxon in Asia, and a very small musteloid lower carnassial, although difficult to identify to genus, is clearly a new record because nothing of this small size has been known in Asia. The overall faunal composition seems to suggest affinity with northern Eurasia rather than southern Asia. Xiaoming Wang. Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90007, United States [email protected] Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 643, Beijing 100044, China. Zhanxiang Qiu. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 643, Beijing 100044, China.
    [Show full text]
  • First North American Fossil Monkey and Early Miocene Tropical Biotic Interchange Jonathan I
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature17415 First North American fossil monkey and early Miocene tropical biotic interchange Jonathan I. Bloch1, Emily D. Woodruff1,2, Aaron R. Wood1,3, Aldo F. Rincon1,4, Arianna R. Harrington1,2,5, Gary S. Morgan6, David A. Foster4, Camilo Montes7, Carlos A. Jaramillo8, Nathan A. Jud1, Douglas S. Jones1 & Bruce J. MacFadden1 New World monkeys (platyrrhines) are a diverse part of modern Primates Linnaeus, 1758 tropical ecosystems in North and South America, yet their early Anthropoidea Mivart, 1864 evolutionary history in the tropics is largely unknown. Molecular Platyrrhini Geoffroy, 1812 divergence estimates suggest that primates arrived in tropical Cebidae Bonaparte, 1831 Central America, the southern-most extent of the North American Panamacebus transitus gen. et sp. nov. landmass, with several dispersals from South America starting with the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama 3–4 million years Etymology. Generic name combines ‘Panama’ with ‘Cebus’, root taxon ago (Ma)1. The complete absence of primate fossils from Central for Cebidae. Specific name ‘transit’ (Latin, crossing) refers to its implied America has, however, limited our understanding of their history early Miocene dispersal between South and North America. in the New World. Here we present the first description of a fossil Holotype. UF 280128, left upper first molar (M1; Fig. 2a, b). monkey recovered from the North American landmass, the oldest Referred material. Left upper second molar (M2; UF 281001; Fig. 2a, b), known crown platyrrhine, from a precisely dated 20.9-Ma layer in partial left lower first incisor (I1; UF 280130), right lower second the Las Cascadas Formation in the Panama Canal Basin, Panama.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Marine Mammals
    Romero, A. 2009. The Biology of Marine Mammals. The Biology of Marine Mammals Aldemaro Romero, Ph.D. Arkansas State University Jonesboro, AR 2009 2 INTRODUCTION Dear students, 3 Chapter 1 Introduction to Marine Mammals 1.1. Overture Humans have always been fascinated with marine mammals. These creatures have been the basis of mythical tales since Antiquity. For centuries naturalists classified them as fish. Today they are symbols of the environmental movement as well as the source of heated controversies: whether we are dealing with the clubbing pub seals in the Arctic or whaling by industrialized nations, marine mammals continue to be a hot issue in science, politics, economics, and ethics. But if we want to better understand these issues, we need to learn more about marine mammal biology. The problem is that, despite increased research efforts, only in the last two decades we have made significant progress in learning about these creatures. And yet, that knowledge is largely limited to a handful of species because they are either relatively easy to observe in nature or because they can be studied in captivity. Still, because of television documentaries, ‘coffee-table’ books, displays in many aquaria around the world, and a growing whale and dolphin watching industry, people believe that they have a certain familiarity with many species of marine mammals (for more on the relationship between humans and marine mammals such as whales, see Ellis 1991, Forestell 2002). As late as 2002, a new species of beaked whale was being reported (Delbout et al. 2002), in 2003 a new species of baleen whale was described (Wada et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original 4.92 MB
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………..………2 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………. 3 WHAT IS COMPLEXITY? ………………………………………………………………... 3 HIERARCHY ……………………………………………………………………………... 5 DIVISION OF LABOR & PARTS …………………………………………………………...7 COMPLEXITY VERSUS REDUNDANCY…………………………………………………… 8 REFINED DEFINITION OF COMPLEXITY ………………………………………………… 9 WHY FOCUS ON WHALES?..... ………………………………….......…………………..…9 METHODS………………………………………………………………………………..………14 APPLICATIONS …………………………………………………………………………. 20 SOURCES OF DATA ……………………………………………………………………... 20 RESULTS ………………………………………………………………………………..………..20 DISCUSSION….………………………………………………………………………………..… 28 TREND TOWARDS SIMPLICITY ...………………………………………………………...28 FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF EXTINCT CETACEANS ……………………………………..….. 30 ROLE OF HABITAT IN DENTITION SIMPLIFICATION ……………………………………. 31 CONCLUSIONS …………………………………………………………………………………...35 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………..………. .36 APPENDIX A……………………………………………………………………………..……… 37 APPENDIX B……………………………………………………………………………..……… 39 APPENDIX C……………………………………………………………………………..……… 40 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………. 42 [1] ABSTRACT Over billions of years, evolution has given rise to organisms that have increased dramatically in complexity, from microbes alone to communities that include modern humans and the great whales. But change in individual lineages, occurring by chance and in adaptation to unpredictable circumstances, does not necessarily involve increasing complexity. Complexity may increase or decrease depending on the immediate situation.
    [Show full text]