DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlas Smelting and Refining 5 Houston, Harris County NFA 02/16/2009 7 Years Between

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Atlas Smelting and Refining 5 Houston, Harris County NFA 02/16/2009 7 years between The site is located west of interstate Hwy 45 in the Houston Heights neighborhood, located north of downtown Houston, inside loop 610. The surrounding land use is residential. A Pre-Cerclis Check List was prepared for the site in March 2002. The Pre-Cerclis Report noted that the site posed a Low Potential Hazard. The Report further noted that the site was found to be inactive, and the two buildings comprising the site had signs that said “FOR LEASE.” It also noted that the previous site activities were unknown. No file information was available from the EPA or the TCEQ regarding the site operational history. A TCEQ representative visited the site on January 22, 2009. The representative observed that the old buildings had been demolished and removed from the site; and the site was currently occupied by two-story residences. The TCEQ representative also spoke to Mr. Matt Christianson, representative of Sullivan Interests (Luxury Home Builder) during the site visit. According to Mr. Christianson, the company is a real estate developer. The company purchased the site in 2006, and the adjacent Iron and Metal site in 2004. These two businesses are located in a residential neighborhood. The company removed the existing structures and built high end homes, which the company sold to individuals. Mr. Christianson further stated that the site was inactive at the time his company purchased the site; and the two on-site buildings were housing the parts painting equipment. The Company stated to TCEQ that the company did not notice any evidence that would indicate smelting operations were taking place in the buildings that were removed. Based on the file review and TCEQ investigation on January 22, 2009, no further action is recommended at this site under the State Superfund Program at this time. Colorado River Municipal Water District - Snyder Well Field PWS ID 2080022 Snyder, Scurry County OTH 08/29/2008 "The site is a Public Water Supply providing water to 2514 people and approximately 838 connections. It is still active under the Public Water Supply program and any enforcement action would first be taken under that program. TCEQ records do not indicate that the site is under any enforcement action at this time (record review of 08/28/08). In May of 2004 a routine sampling event indicated that benzene was present in the water supply well above the maximum contaminant level (MCL). In August of 2006 a Pre-CERCLIS inspection was conducted by the TCEQ to determine if a source of the benzene could be identified. During the Pre-CERCLIS inspection the supervisor in charge of the well, indicated that the likely source of the organic contaminants detected during a May 2004 sampling event was a malfunctioning exhaust fan. This malfunction occurred at approximately the same time as a non-compliance notification was sent to the MUD. In March of 2005 the TCEQ notified the MUD that the running average during the first quarter of 2005 was 7.0 ug/L which exceeds the MCL of 5.0 ug/L. The MUD was placed on compliance monitoring in 01/01/2005 based on these results and this monitoring ended in 03/31/2005. The most recent sampling results (November 2005) indicate that benzene was found at a concentration of 2.2 mg\L. The site will continue to be monitored by Public Water Supply. This site is currently active under the Public Water Supply Program and therefore is not eligible for the State Superfund program at this time." Buchanan Dam Site 28 Kingsland, Llano County OTH 10/20/2008 In 1985, the Texas Department of Water Resources (TDWR) investigated a complaint of gasoline in private water wells near the intersection of FM 1431 (also known as Ranch Road 1431) and State Highway 29 along Lake Buchanan in Llano County. Analysis of samples of 14 wells by TDWR and the Region 6 Department of Health collected in 1984 and 1985 detected the presence of benzene, toluene, xylene, dichloroethane, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and other constituents of gasoline at concentrations of 1 to 10 mg/L in at least three of the wells. Dichloroethane and MTBE were consistently found in two of the wells. The Buchanan Dam Site has been addressed under TCEQ State Lead Leaking Petroleum Storage Tank (LPST) Site #091262 Former Deano’s Gas Station, currently an active fuel facility. Davis Road Drum Site & May Cooperage Residential Removal 30 Houston, Harris County NFA 02/11/2015 20 years between spill discovery and clean up Site Setting and History: The May-Cooperage Drum Reclamation Company site (site) operated at the site located at 1714 Davis Street in Houston, Harris County, Texas in the 1980s. The site, also known as The Davis Road Dump site is a series of mostly vacant lots and encompasses approximately 0.25 acres of land in the center of a residential neighborhood. The Site is bordered to the north by Mills Street, to the east by a vacant lot and residential homes, to the south by residential homes, and to the west by Davis Street. Drums with unknown contents were reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) during a site sampling inspection that also documented metal-contaminated soils in 1988. The site had been prone to indiscriminate dumping over the years. The empty lots adjacent and to the south of the site and an empty lot across the street along Harrington Street have also experienced dumping over the years. A site inspection by EPA in 1988 documented 76 drums with unknown contents. Many drums were on their side with what appeared to be deliberate punctures. Sampling results from this site inspection found soils contaminated with metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and inorganic compounds. A removal action was conducted in March 1989 to address the abandoned drums. The site was referred by EPA to the TCEQ predecessor agency in August 1992 for further evaluation. The site was evaluated for eligibility into the State Superfund Program in August 1996. Additional sampling was recommended. TCEQ conducted a limited sampling event in June 2005 that focused on the empty lot across the street along Harrington Street where evidence of dumping was observed. This sampling documented lead (Pb) concentrations above residential soil Tier 1 Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs) in all samples and found laboratory detections of metals, VOCs, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), pesticides, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and cyanide in at least one sample. In June 2008, the TCEQ conducted a subsequent sampling event focusing on the residential properties adjacent to the Davis Road Dump site. This sampling documented lead concentrations above residential soil Tier 1 PCLs in three samples located on residential soil and found laboratory detections of metals, SVOCs, and PCBs. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) - benzo(a)pyrene and dibenz(a,h)anthracene - also exceeded residential soil PCLs in one of the samples on residential soil adjacent to the May-Cooperage site . In May 2009, the TCEQ conducted field sampling on the residential properties that were deemed to be contaminated, based on the July 2008 sampling results, to find the extent of contaminated soil on these properties. Soil samples from the back yard of 2613 Harrington Street exhibited lead levels above the protective concentration level (PCL) of 500 mg/kg prompting a removal action in August 2009 (Reference 1). During the July 2009 investigation assessment, new information was received indicating an additional source, located at 1714 Davis Road. In July and August 2009, the TCEQ conducted additional sampling to confirm the existence of a separate source of contamination located at 1714 Davis Road, on the southeast corner of Mills St. and Davis St. intersection, documenting lead, PCBs, arsenic, benzo(b)fluoranthene, and benzo(a)pyrene concentrations above residential soil PCLs at three other properties adjacent to the new source. Due to larger extent of contamination, the TCEQ referred the site to EPA in 2010 for additional assessment and removal action. The EPA Team mobilized to initiate removal action at the site in May 2013 . Due to the statutory funding limitation and the anticipated additional costs of the action, the EPA Team concluded Phase 1 of the on-site removal activities on 27 September 2013; consequently, the TCEQ completed the removal action at the Site. The TCEQ mobilized to begin the second and final phase of the removal action in March 2014. During the work conducted by TCEQ, the EPA Team continued to provide support to the removal action. The TCEQ assumed removal activities completing the removal action on June 2, 2014 (Reference 2). Conclusion: The Removals Program, in cooperation with EPA, has completed the removal action at the site. Sources to the critical pathway of exposure and HRS evaluation, the soil pathway, have been removed. The Removals Program has determined there is no longer an immediate health risk associated with the site. Additionally, site conditions post removal actions would not generate a qualifying HRS site score thus the site does not warrant further action or assessment. A SSDAP eligibility determination of NFA is concluded based on the information available at this MADCO Oil Co 48 Channelview, Harris County NFA 02/18/2009 9 years between spill discovery and assesment A site visit was conducted on November 19, 2008 to assess the current conditions at the site. The site is former Madco Oil Company service station. The Company abandoned the site prior to 1999 with three underground tanks and associated accessories still in place. On August 8, 1999, the Region 12 Spill Team responded to a request from the Channellview Volunteer Fire Department to contain a spill at the site.
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-Storied Place

    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
  • Franklin Fueling Systems Submersible Pumping Systems

    Franklin Fueling Systems Submersible Pumping Systems

    PRODUCT CATALOGUE FRANKLIN FUELING SYSTEMS SUBMERSIBLE PUMPING SYSTEMS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT US 5 Total System Solution 6 Submersible Pumping Systems 8 4" Submersible Pumps 9 Variable Speed 11 Intelligent 16 Magshell™ 19 2 Hp Fixed Speed 20 1½ Hp Fixed Speed 24 ¾ hp Fixed Speed, 50Hz 28 Advanced Protection 32 MLD+ 35 4" Submersible Pump Controllers 37 STP-SCI 37 STP-SCIIIC 39 STP-DHIB 41 STP-CBBS 43 Accessories 44 4" Spare Parts 45 6" High Capacity Pumps 48 3 and 5 hp 50Hz 50 High Capacity Line Leak Detectors 54 6" Submersible Pump Controllers 56 STP-CBB3C and STP-CBB5C 56 6" Spare Parts 57 DEF/AdBlue® 59 Pump Motor Assemblies 59 Submersible Turbine Pump Kits 60 Replacement Parts 64 CONTACT US 67 3 ABOUT US About Us Welcome to Franklin Fueling Systems, the world's leading provider of complete fuelling systems. We are comprised of the industry's most extensive lines of In addition to the industry's most comprehensive product fuelling product solutions. With us, you can get the most offering, Franklin Fueling Systems also provides: comprehensive product offering from the industry's leader in • One order for all equipment total system solutions. • Factory tested leak-tight equipment Franklin Fueling Systems provides unparalleled simplicity in • Reduced site downtimes placing one order, having one point of contact, relying on one service team and receiving one consolidated shipment. • 100% Bio-fuel compatible options A wide variety of products, a world class customer service • Effective control of your fuel stocks experience and extensive technical background create a • Ensured environmental protection complete system solution where our services, features and • Solutions to keep fuel in and water out products set us apart as the industry leader.
  • Module 1 Basics of Water Supply System

    Module 1 Basics of Water Supply System

    Module 1 BASICS OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Training Module for Local Water and Sanitation Management Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (MJP) CEPT University 2012 Basics of Water Supply System- Training Module for Local Water and Sanitation Management CONTENT Introduction 3 Module A Components of Water Supply System 4 A1 Typical village/town Water Supply System 5 A2 Sources of Water 7 A3 Water Treatment 8 A4 Water Supply Mechanism 8 A5 Storage Facilities 8 A6 Water Distribution 9 A7 Types of Water Supply 10 Worksheet Section A 11 Module B Basics on Planning and Estimating Components of Water Supply 12 B1 Basic Planning Principles of Water Supply System 13 B2 Calculate Daily Domestic Need of Water 14 B3 Assess Domestic Waste Availability 14 B4 Assess Domestic Water Gap 17 B5 Estimate Components of Water Supply System 17 B6 Basics on Calculating Roof Top Rain Water Harvesting 18 Module C Basics on Water Pumping and Distribution 19 C1 Basics on Water Pumping 20 C2 Pipeline Distribution Networks 23 C3 Type of Pipe Materials 25 C4 Type of Valves for Water Flow Control 28 C5 Type of Pipe Fittings 30 C6 Type of Pipe Cutting and Assembling Tools 32 C7 Types of Line and Levelling Instruments for Laying Pipelines 34 C8 Basics About Laying of Distribution Pipelines 35 C9 Installation of Water Meters 42 Worksheet Section C 44 Module D Basics on Material Quality Check, Work Measurement and 45 Specifications in Water Supply System D1 Checklist for Quality Check of Basic Construction Materials 46 D2 Basics on Material and Item Specification and Mode of 48 Measurements Worksheet Section D 52 Module E Water Treatment and Quality Control 53 E1 Water Quality and Testing 54 E2 Water Treatment System 57 Worksheet Section E 62 References 63 1 Basics of Water Supply System- Training Module for Local Water and Sanitation Management ABBREVIATIONS CPHEEO Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation cu.
  • Frontera Energy Corporation Dated: March 27, 2018

    Frontera Energy Corporation Dated: March 27, 2018

    FRONTERA ENERGY CORPORATION ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 DATED: MARCH 27, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .............................................................................................................................................. 3 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 8 GENERAL MATTERS .................................................................................................................................................10 CORPORATE STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................................10 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS......................................................................................................11 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ..........................................................................................................................18 OIL AND NATURAL GAS CONTRACTS AND PROPERTIES ...................................................................................25 INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS ....................................................................................................................................31 RISK FACTORS .........................................................................................................................................................33
  • Pump Station Design Guidelines – Second Edition

    Pump Station Design Guidelines – Second Edition

    Pump Station Design Guidelines – Second Edition Jensen Engineered Systems 825 Steneri Way Sparks, NV 89431 For design assistance call (855)468-5600 ©2012 Jensen Precast JensenEngineeredSystems.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 OVERVIEW OF A TYPICAL JES SUBMERSIBLE LIFT STATION ....................................................................................... 3 DESIGN PROCESS ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 BASIC PUMP SELECTION ............................................................................................................................................... 5 THE SYSTEM CURVE ................................................................................................................................................... 5 STATIC LOSSES....................................................................................................................................................... 5 FRICTION LOSSES .................................................................................................................................................. 6 TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD ........................................................................................................................................
  • Washington and Saratoga Counties in the War of 1812 on Its Northern

    Washington and Saratoga Counties in the War of 1812 on Its Northern

    D. Reid Ross 5-8-15 WASHINGTON AND SARATOGA COUNTIES IN THE WAR OF 1812 ON ITS NORTHERN FRONTIER AND THE EIGHT REIDS AND ROSSES WHO FOUGHT IT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Illustrations Maj. Gen. Jacob Brown 3 Map upstate New York locations 4 Map of Champlain Valley locations 4 Chapters 1. Initial Support 5 2. The Niagara Campaign 6 3. Action on Lake Champlain at Whitehall and Training Camps for the Green Troops 10 4. The Battle of Plattsburg 12 5. Significance of the Battle 15 6. The Fort Erie Sortie and a Summary of the Records of the Four Rosses and Four Reids 15 7. Bibliography 15 2 Maj. Gen. Jacob Brown as depicted3 in an engraving published in 1862 4 1 INITIAL SUPPORT Daniel T. Tompkins, New York’s governor since 1807, and Peter B. Porter, the U.S. Congressman, first elected in 1808 to represent western New York, were leading advocates of a war of conquest against the British over Canada. Tompkins was particularly interested in recruiting and training a state militia and opening and equipping state arsenals in preparation for such a war. Normally, militiamen were obligated only for three months of duty during the War of 1812, although if the President requested, the period could be extended to a maximum of six months. When the militia was called into service by the governor or his officers, it was paid by the state. When called by the President or an officer of the U.S. Army, it was paid by the U.S. Treasury. In 1808, the United States Congress took the first steps toward federalizing state militias by appropriating $200,000 – a hopelessly inadequate sum – to arm and train citizen soldiers needed to supplement the nation’s tiny standing army.
  • BERNAL-THESIS-2020.Pdf (5.477Mb)

    BERNAL-THESIS-2020.Pdf (5.477Mb)

    BROWNWOOD: BAYTOWN’S MOST HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD by Laura Bernal A thesis submitted to the History Department, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Chair of Committee: Dr. Monica Perales Committee Member: Dr. Mark Goldberg Committee Member: Dr. Kristin Wintersteen University of Houston May 2020 Copyright 2020, Laura Bernal “A land without ruins is a land without memories – a land without memories is a land without history.” -Father Abram Joseph Ryan, “A Land Without Ruins” iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, and foremost, I want to thank God for guiding me on this journey. Thank you to my family for their unwavering support, especially to my parents and sisters. Thank you for listening to me every time I needed to work out an idea and for staying up late with me as I worked on this project. More importantly, thank you for accompanying me to the Baytown Nature Center hoping to find more house foundations. I am very grateful to the professors who helped me. Dr. Monica Perales, my advisor, thank you for your patience and your guidance as I worked on this project. Thank you to my defense committee, Dr. Kristin Wintersteen and Dr. Goldberg. Your advice helped make this my best work. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Debbie Harwell, who encouraged me to pursue this project, even when I doubted it its impact. Thank you to the friends and co-workers who listened to my opinions and encouraged me to not give up. Lastly, I would like to thank the people I interviewed.
  • Battle of Cook's Mills National Historic Site

    Battle of Cook's Mills National Historic Site

    Management Battle of Statement 2019 Cook’s Mills National Historic Site of Canada The Parks Canada Agency manages one of the finest and most extensive systems of protected natural and historic areas in the world. The Agency’s mandate is to protect and present these places for the benefit and enjoyment of current and future generations. This management statement outlines Parks Canada’s management approach and objectives for Battle of Cook’s Mills National Historic Site. The Battle of Cook's Mills National Historic Site is a rolling semi-rural landscape east of the Welland Canal bordering the north bank of Lyon’s Creek in the City of Welland, Ontario. It was the site of an engagement between British and Canadian troops and American forces during the War of 1812. After his unsuccessful siege of Fort Erie, Lieutenant-General Gordon Drummond withdrew north and concentrated his army along the Chippawa River. In October 1814, American forces under Major-General George Izard advanced northwards. On October 18th Izard ordered Brigadier General Bissell with a force of about 900 men to march to Cook's Mills, a British outpost, to seize provisions in the form of wheat intended for British troops. On October 19th, at Cook's Mills, a heavy skirmish took place, involving men of the Glengarry Light Infantry and the 82nd, 100th and 104th Regiments. Led by Lieutenant-Colonel Christopher Myers, the British and Canadian troops succeeded in their objective of assessing the American forces so that Drummond could take appropriate action. Having accomplished their reconnaissance in force they withdrew in good order.
  • Arkansas Moves Toward Secession and War

    Arkansas Moves Toward Secession and War

    RICE UNIVERSITY WITH HESITANT RESOLVE: ARKANSAS MOVES TOWARD SECESSION AND WAR BY JAMES WOODS A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS Dr.. Frank E. Vandiver Houston, Texas ABSTRACT This work surveys the history of ante-bellum Arkansas until the passage of the Ordinance of Secession on May 6, 186i. The first three chapters deal with the social, economic, and politicai development of the state prior to 1860. Arkansas experienced difficult, yet substantial .social and economic growth during the ame-belium era; its percentage of population increase outstripped five other frontier states in similar stages of development. Its growth was nevertheless hampered by the unsettling presence of the Indian territory on its western border, which helped to prolong a lawless stage. An unreliable transportation system and a ruinous banking policy also stalled Arkansas's economic progress. On the political scene a family dynasty controlled state politics from 1830 to 186u, a'situation without parallel throughout the ante-bellum South. A major part of this work concentrates upon Arkansas's politics from 1859 to 1861. In a most important siate election in 1860, the dynasty met defeat through an open revolt from within its ranks led by a shrewd and ambitious Congressman, Thomas Hindman. Hindman turned the contest into a class conflict, portraying the dynasty's leadership as "aristocrats" and "Bourbons." Because of Hindman's support, Arkansans chose its first governor not hand¬ picked by the dynasty. By this election the people handed gubernatorial power to an ineffectual political novice during a time oi great sectional crisis.
  • Coiled-Tubing Technology (1995-1998)

    Coiled-Tubing Technology (1995-1998)

    Coiled-Tubing Technology (1995-1998) DEA-67 Phase I1 PROJECT TO DEVELOP AND EVALUATE COILED-TUBING AND SLIM-HOLE TECHNOLOGY MAURER ENGINEERING INC. 2916 West T.C. Jester Boulevard Houston, TX 77018-7098 Telephone: (713) 683-8227 Facsimile: (713) 683-6418 Internet: http://www.maureng.com E-Mail: [email protected] TR98-10 April 1998 The copyrighted 1998 confidential report is for the use of Participants on the Drilling Engineering Association DEA-67 PHASE II project to Develop and Evaluate Coiled-Tubing and Slim-Hole Technology and their affiliates, and is not to be disclosed to other parties. Participants and their aff~liatesare free to make copies of this report for their own use. F Coiled-Tubing Technology (1995-1998) TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter ARTIFICIALLIFT ..............................................................1 BUCKLING ....................................................................2 CEMENTING ................................................................... 3 COILEDWBING ............................................................... 4 DRILLING ..................................................................... 5 FATIGUE ......................................................................6 FISHING ....................................................................... 7 LOGGING ..................................................................... 8 OVERVIEW ....................................................................9 PIPELINES .................................................................... 10 PRODUCTIONSTRINGS
  • Downloadrailroad-Era Resources of Southwest

    Downloadrailroad-Era Resources of Southwest

    Railroad-Era Resources of Southwest Arkansas (Lafayette, Little River, Miller, and Sevier Counties) 1870-1945 By the Staff of the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program Originally published by the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program in 1996. This volume is one of a series developed by the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program (AHPP) for the identification and registration of the state's cultural resources. For more information, write the AHPP at 1100 North Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, call (501) 324-9880, or send an e-mail to [email protected]. The Arkansas Historic Preservation Program is the agency of Arkansas Heritage responsible for the identification, evaluation, registration and preservation of the state's cultural resources. Arkansas Heritage is a division of the Arkansas Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism. Arkansas Historic Preservation Program 1100 North Street | Little Rock, AR 72201 | p: 501.324.9880 | f: 501.324.9184 [email protected] | ArkansasPreservation.com Railroad-Era Resources of Southwest Arkansas (Lafayette, Little River, Miller and Sevier Counties) 1870-1945 Cotton Belt Railroad Hospital, Texarkana, Miller County Cover photo courtesy of Arkansas History Commission Contents Early Railroad History .......................................................................................................................3 Early Railroad Development in Arkansas ..........................................................................................3 Railroad Development in Southwest
  • Beach and Bay Access Guide

    Beach and Bay Access Guide

    Texas Beach & Bay Access Guide Second Edition Texas General Land Office Jerry Patterson, Commissioner The Texas Gulf Coast The Texas Gulf Coast consists of cordgrass marshes, which support a rich array of marine life and provide wintering grounds for birds, and scattered coastal tallgrass and mid-grass prairies. The annual rainfall for the Texas Coast ranges from 25 to 55 inches and supports morning glories, sea ox-eyes, and beach evening primroses. Click on a region of the Texas coast The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on these maps, or the data from which it was produced. These maps are NOT suitable for navigational purposes and do not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. How to Use This Guide 3 III. Beach and Bay Public Access Sites A. Southeast Texas 7 (Jefferson and Orange Counties) 1. Map 2. Area information 3. Activities/Facilities B. Houston-Galveston (Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Matagorda Counties) 21 1. Map 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities C. Golden Crescent (Calhoun, Jackson and Victoria Counties) 1. Map 79 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities D. Coastal Bend (Aransas, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio Counties) 1. Map 96 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities E. Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron and Willacy Counties) 1. Map 2. Area Information 128 3. Activities/Facilities IV. National Wildlife Refuges V. Wildlife Management Areas VI. Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Centers 139 143 147 Introduction It’s no wonder that coastal communities are the most densely populated and fastest growing areas in the country.