<<

Asian Defoliators Sharpening Your Observation Skills Objectives

• To learn how to recognize key characteristics of Dendrolimus (lappet ) and (gypsy moths) • To learn how to recognize similar, native, look-alike and distinguish them from the potential invaders Introduction

• Defoliation = the removal of all or part of the foliage of a plant • Herbivore = an which eats only plants • defoliators damage plants by eating leaves or needles Photo: tent and defoliation on © William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Bugwood.org

Introduction Classification based on • Insect order • Pattern • Feeding structure • Time of year • Host specificity

Photos: katydid feeding on leaves (top) © Herbert Pase III, Bugwood.org and skeletonizing on European linden (bottom) © Steven Katovich, USDA-FS, Bugwood.org Defoliation clue: insect order Most common insect orders which defoliate plants • —moths, butterflies • Hymenoptera— sawflies, • Coleoptera— • Orthoptera—katydids, grasshoppers, etc. • Diptera—flies

Photos: sawfly (top) © USDA-FS Region 8 - Southern Archive, Bugwood.org and (bottom) viburnum leaf adults © D.D. O’Brien, Cornell University, Bugwood.org

Defoliation clue: pattern

Defoliation by pattern • Complete leaf eaten • Individual holes • Mining • Skeletonizing

Photo: complete defoliation on pine caused by spiny © William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Bugwood.org

Defoliation clue: pattern

Complete defoliation Individual holes

Skeletonizing Mining damage

Photos: clockwise from top left © H. Ovidiu, University of Oradea; P. Weston, Cornell University; M. Zubrik, FRI – Slovakia; J. Solomon, US-FS. All images Bugwood.org.

Defoliation clue: feeding structures Feeding structures • Tents • Rolled leaves • Casebearers • Free feeders

Photos: eastern tent (top) © David Cappaert, State Univ., Bugwood.org and orangestriped oakworms © Ryan St. Laurent, Cornell University

Defoliation clue: feeding structure

Tents Rolled leaves

Free feeders Casebearers

Photos: clockwise from top left © P. Sloderbeck, Kansas State University; DPIW, Tasmania Archive; W. Upham, KSU; B. McNee, WI-DNR. All images Bugwood.org

Defoliation clue: time of year

Insects cause damage at specific times of the year • Spring defoliators • Spring/summer • Summer

Photo: nests © Dawn Dailey O’Brien, Cornell University

Asian defoliators featuring LYMANTRIA SPP. & DENDROLIMUS SPP. Asian defoliators (AD) vs native defoliators • Native defoliators and the established European gypsy () frequently defoliate broadleaved • The AD belonging to the Lymantria may defoliate broadleaved or coniferous trees • The ADs in the genus Dendrolimus are conifer feeders • Total defoliation of conifers is uncommon to rare in the Eastern US―and should alert you that it could likely be an AD introduction AD vs native defoliators

Native defoliating lappet moths () – Same family as Dendrolimus – Forest is common on is common on black cherry

Photos: forest tent caterpillar (top) © Franclemont larval slide collection, CUIC and eastern tent caterpillar (bottom) D. D. O’Brien, Cornell University AD vs native defoliators

• Native defoliators feed primarily on broadleaved trees • Conifer defoliation is uncommon in the Eastern US – Pine sawflies (order: Hymenoptera) • In parts of the western US native Lepidoptera conifer defoliators include the pine silkmoths & tussock moth AD vs native defoliators

• Defoliation of conifers in the Eastern US should be an instant red flag – Dendrolimus sibiricus, D. punctatus, and D. pini are obligate conifer feeders – Gypsy moths native to Asia (Lymantria spp.) will also feed on conifers • In the event of defoliation of coniferous trees, any Lepidoptera larvae should be collected and identified

© John H. Ghent, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org Conifer defoliation facts

• Coniferous trees are less tolerant of defoliation than trees. • Defoliation makes trees more vulnerable to secondary organisms. • Late season defoliation is less stressful than early season defoliation. Recognizing AD larvae

• The larvae of the three Dendrolimus spp. are all similar to each other, but very recognizable when compared to native conifer feeders • Most AD Lymantria spp. larvae are very similar to each other and cannot always be readily differentiated from the already established European gypsy moth Larvae: Siberian moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus)

Photo: © John Ghent, US-FS, Bugwood.org

Larvae: Dendrolimus

Pine- lappet moth Masson pine caterpillar () (Dendrolimus punctatus)

Photos: © William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Bugwood.org

Larvae: European gypsy moth ()

Photos: © Franclemont larval slide collection, CUIC, Cornell University Sharpening Your Observation skills SOME NATIVE LYMANTRIA LARVAL LOOK-ALIKES Lymantria look-alike: furcilla (: )

Photos: © Franclemont larval slide collection, CUIC, Cornell University Lymantria look-alike: Panthea spp. Lymantria look-alike: spp. () Lymantria look-alike: spp. (Lymantriinae) Sharpening Your Observation Skills SOME NATIVE DENDROLIMUS LARVAL LOOK-ALIKES Dendrolimus larval look-alike: sp. (Lasiocampidae)

Tolype velleda

Tolype laricis

Photos: © David Cappaert, Michigan State University, Bugwood.org and Agricultural Experiment Station Archive, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, Bugwood.org Dendrolimus larval look-alike: Artace sp. (Lasiocampidae)

Dot-lined white Artace cribrarius Artace colaria female

Photos: Artace cribrarius larva, courtesy of Sean McCann, Bugguide.com and Artace colaria female © CUIC, Cornell University Dendrolimus larval look-alike: American lappet moth ( americana: Lasiocampidae)

Photo courtesy of Andrée Reno Sanborn of Barton,

Dendrolimus larval look-alike: Gloveria (Lasiocampidae)

Gloveria gargamelle larvae

Photos: Gloveria gargamelle courtesy of Valerie Bugh Dendrolimus larval look-alike: angelica ()

Photo courtesy of Colin Gillette Dendrolimus spp. ADULT IDENTIFICATION

Siberian silk moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) Males and females are similar but females are larger, with broader wings. Wingspan • male: 40–60 mm • female: 60–80 mm Key features • three dark, notched stripes on the wings • white spot usually present near center of forewing

© Kent Loeffler, Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University Siberian silk moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus)

Males and females are similar but females are larger, with broader wings. Wingspan • male: 40–60 mm • female: 60–80 mm Key features • three dark, notched ♀ stripes on the wings • white spot usually present near center of forewing

Photo: and Diseases Image Library, Bugwood.org Pine-tree lappet moth (Dendrolimus pini)

Males and females are similar but females are larger, with broader wings. Wingspan • male: 50–70 mm • female: 70–90 mm Key features • prominent brown bands located at the base of the forewing • white spot usually present near center of forewing Pine-tree lappet moth: brown form Masson pine caterpillar (Dendrolimus punctatus)

Males and females are similar but females are larger, with broader wings. Wingspan • male: 50–80 mm • female: larger Key features • wings mostly uniform brown • line nearest edge of wing unconnected • line discontinuous rather than mostly continuous as in D. sibiricus and D. pini

Dendrolimus spp. ADULT LOOK-ALIKES

Large look-alike, Southwestern lappet moths (Lasiocampidae)

Caloecia juvenalis

Caloecia entima Large look-alike, Southwestern lappet moths (Lasiocampidae)

Dicogaster coronada

Quadrina diazoma Large look-alike, Southwestern lappet moths (Lasiocampidae)

Gloveria arizonensis Gloveria medusa Gloveria gargamelle Large native non-Lasiocampidae pine feeders

Pandora pine moth (Coloradia pandora)

Northern pine sphinx ( bombycoides) Pine devil (Citheronia sepulcralis) Lymantria spp. ADULT IDENTIFICATION Lymantria (the similar species) The key feature to recognize: arc and dot • L. dispar asiatica • L. dispar japonica • L. umbrosa

• L. albescens arc • L. postalba dot

Lymantria (the similar species)

Lymantria dispar dispar (EGM) L. d. asiatica L. d. japonica Lymantria (the similar species)

L. postalba

Lymantria umbrosa L. albescens Lymantria (the unique, easily identifiable species) • L. mathura — Rosy gypsy moth • L. monacha* — Nun moth • L. xylina

Rosy gypsy moth ()

Wingspan • male FW length: 21–24 mm • female ~38 mm Key features • males yellow hindwings • females whitish with pink – immediately recognizable from other AD Lymantria spp. – no native look-alike species

Lymantria xylina

Wingspan • male FW length: 25–28 mm • female: ~35 mm Key features • off-white coloration • single transverse, wavy band on forewing – No native look-alike species

Nun moth (Lymantria monacha)

Wingspan • male FW length: 18–20 mm • female: 27–29 mm Key features • white forewings with ziz- zagging lines • arc/dot not as pronounced • heavy maculation • hindwings are greyish

Nun moth look-alikes

Furcula scolopendrina Black zigzag moth ()

Lichnoptera decora Native tussock moths (: Lymantriinae)

Orgyia spp. Key diagnostic features • white patch in lower corner of forewings, about a quarter of the way from edge (in most species) • dorsal abdominal tufts of scales • females are wingless Dasychira spp. Key diagnostic features • Dorsal abdominal tufts of scales Native tussock moths: Orgyia

Orgyia spp. Key diagnostic feature • patch of white scales on the bottom edge of the forewing

Lymantria dispar dispar Key diagnostic feature • no white patch • arc dot feature

Native tussock moths: Orgyia

Orgyia leucostigma

Orgyia definita

Orgyia antiqua Orgyia falcata Native tussock moths: Dasychira

Dasychira spp. Key diagnostic features • dorsal tufts of scales • stockier than Orgyia spp. • females are winged

Lymantria dispar dispar Key diagnostic features • no dorsal tufts • arc dot feature

Native tussock moths: Dasychira

Dasychira tephra

Dasychira grisefacta

Dasychira vagans Supporting materials

Visit www.FirstDetector.org for materials to supplement this presentation including posters, diagnostic photo guides and promotional materials.

Authors

Ryan St. Laurent ‘16, Department of Entomology, Cornell University

Rachel McCarthy, NPDN Training and Education Coordinator, Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University Reviewed by

John H. Ghent, USDA Forest Service Entomologist, Ashville, References

• https://caps.ceris.purdue.edu/survey/asian-defoliator/reference/2013 • Ferguson D.C. (1978) , Lymantriidae. In: Hodges RW et al. (Eds) The moths of North America, fascicle 22.2. Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Washington, DC. • Franclemont, J.G. (1973). The Moths of America North of Mexico. 20.1. Mimallonoidea and , Apatelodidae, , Lasiocampidae. London, E.W. Classey & R.B.D. • Pogue, M. G. and P. W. Schaefer. (2007) A review of selected species of Lymantria Hübner [1819] including three new species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Lymantriinae) from subtropical and temperate regions of Asia, some potentially invasive to North America. Forest Health Technology Enterprise TeamTechnology Transfer. FHTET-2006-07. • Wagner, D. L. (2005) Caterpillars of Eastern North America: A Guide to Identification and Natural History. Princeton University Press. • Wagner, D. L., D. F. Schweitzer, J. B. Sullivan, and R. C. Reardon. (2011) Owlet Caterpillars of Eastern North America (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Princeton University Press. Acknowledgements

Funding for the Sharpening Your Observations Skills project was provided by the USDA 10201 Farm Bill, cooperative agreement 13-8236-0984-CA.