DOCSLIB.ORG

Issue Paper Hungary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ISSUE PAPER HUNGARY: VIEWS OF SEVERAL SOURCES ON THE SITUATION OF ROMA All the sources of information contained in this document are identified and are publicly available. RESEARCH DIRECTORATE IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE BOARD OTTAWA, CANADA 2 September 2001 i This paper was prepared by the Research Directorate of the Immigration and Refugee Board on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. This paper is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. For further information on current developments, please contact the Research Directorate. Research completed 25 May 2001 Additional research completed 13 September 2001 ii Table of Contents MAP ............................................................................................................................................... iv GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................................... vi 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................1 2. ETHNIC AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF THE ROMA MINORITY.......................................1 3. ATTITUDE OF THE POPULATION...........................................................................................3 4. OVERVIEW OF GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND THEIR RESULTS.....................................5 4.1 Publicization of Government Programmes..................................................................................6 4.2 Control of Spending and Results of Government Programmes....................................................7 4.3 The Medium-Term Programme and the Long-Term Strategy .....................................................8 5. SKINHEAD ATTACKS..............................................................................................................9 6. THE ROMA AND THE POLICE.................................................................................................9 6.1 Treatment of Roma by the Police..............................................................................................9 6.1.1 Discrimination ..................................................................................................................12 6.2 Police Initiatives......................................................................................................................13 7. THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND LEGAL REPRESENTATION ................................................14 8. THE SYSTEM OF MINORITY SELF-GOVERNMENTS ........................................................15 8.1 Elections.................................................................................................................................16 8.2 Relations Between Minority Self-Governments and Other State Bodies....................................17 8.2.1 Relations Between Minority Self-Governments and Local Governments.............................17 8.2.2 Relations Between the National Roma Self-Government and the Roma Local Self- Governments.............................................................................................................................18 8.3 Funding and Services Provided by the Roma Minority Self-Governments.................................18 9. EDUCATION.............................................................................................................................19 9.1 Overview ...............................................................................................................................19 9.2 Government Programmes........................................................................................................21 9.2.1 The Complementary Normative Subsidy...........................................................................22 9.2.2 Scholarships.....................................................................................................................24 9.3 Segregation and Special Schools/Classes ................................................................................24 9.4 Non-Government Programmes ...............................................................................................26 9.4.1 Hostels ............................................................................................................................27 9.4.2 Extra-Curricular Activities (Tutoring) ................................................................................27 10. EMPLOYMENT......................................................................................................................28 10.1 Unemployment.....................................................................................................................29 10.2 Government Initiatives...........................................................................................................30 10.2.1 Public Works.................................................................................................................30 iii 10.3 Private and Non-Governmental Initiatives..............................................................................31 10.4 Discrimination.......................................................................................................................31 11. HEALTH ISSUES ....................................................................................................................32 12. SOCIAL ISSUES.....................................................................................................................32 12.1 Housing................................................................................................................................33 12.1.1 Squatters .......................................................................................................................34 12.2 Infrastructures.......................................................................................................................34 12.3 Social Assistance..................................................................................................................34 12.4 Children...............................................................................................................................35 13. NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS......................................................................35 13.1 Roma Community Houses.....................................................................................................36 NOTES ON SELECTED SOURCES.............................................................................................38 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................44 iv MAP Source: Merriam - Webster's Atlas. 2001. Hungary. <http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/nytmaps.pl?hungary> [Accessed 17 Sept. 2001] v vi GLOSSARY BECMIR: Bureau for European Comparative Minority Research IOM: International Organization for Migration MSzP: Hungarian Socialist Party (Magyar Szocialista Part, opposition) NEKH: Office for National and Ethnic Minorities NEKI: Legal Defence Bureau for National and Ethnic Minorities NRSG: National Roma Self-Government PHARE: (Poland and Hungary Action for the Restructuring of the Economy): The PHARE Programme is the European Union's initiative which provides grant finance to support its partner countries to the stage where they are ready to assume the obligations of membership of the European Union. UNHCR: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 1. INTRODUCTION From 15 May 2001 to 25 May 2001, the Research Directorate undertook a field mission to Hungary during which 30 interviews were conducted with a selection of Hungarian ministerial officials, representatives from local governments, Roma national and local self-governments, foreign governments, international governmental and non-governmental organizations, Roma and non-Roma non-governmental organizations, and experts. For some of them, clarifications and further information were received subsequently through correspondence. Dates in the parenthetical references distinguish the sources of information. This paper updates and should be read in conjunction with several IRB publications, including the May 2001 Issue Paper Hungary: Government Actions to Improve the Situation of Roma in 2000-2001, HUN36432.E of 11 January 2001, HUN35936.E of 17 November 2000, HUN35685.E of 6 October 2000, HUN34766.E of 8 September 2000, HUN34791.E of 28 August 2000 and HUN33946.EX of 28 February 2000, as well as information provided in 1998 and 1999, all available in the IRB Regional Documentation Centres and on the IRB Website at <www.irb.gc.ca>. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the specialists and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IRB or the Research Directorate. 2. ETHNIC AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF THE ROMA MINORITY Although non-Roma Hungarians regard the Roma as a homogeneous minority (Osztojkan 15 May 2001; Eros 21 May 2001), the Roma are characterized by an ethnic and social variety (Szabados 21 May 2001); for example with respect to level of education and living conditions (Kallai 24 May 2001). Despite this variety, Bela Osztojkan, a Roma writer, founder of the non-governmental organization Phralipe and vice-president of the National Roma Self-Government (NRSG), is unaware of any tensions
Recommended publications
  • Casestudy 2 Oszlopos.Indd

    Casestudy 2 Oszlopos.Indd

    J. SELYE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE NO. 1. TYPOLOGY OF SHOPPING CENTRES IN BUDAPEST by Tamás Sikos T. and Magdalene Hoffmann KOMÁRNO 2005 ISSN 1336-7870 2005 by Research Institute, J. Selye University, Komárno Technical editor: Nagy Angéla, Polák Gábor Printed in Slovakia by Valeur s. r. o., Dunajská Streda CONTENTS 1. TYPOLOGY OF SHOPPING CENTRES IN BUDAPEST....... 5 2. TYPOLOGY OF SHOPPING CENTRES................................... 8 2.1. Winners and losers............................................................ 12 2.2. Estimation of trade............................................................ 12 . 2.3. Budagyöngye.................................................................... 13 2.4. Rózsakert........................................................................... 14 2.5. Mammut I. and Mammut II. ............................................. 15 2.6. Duna Plaza......................................................................... 17 2.7. WestEnd City Center......................................................... 18 2.8. Pólus Center...................................................................... 19 2.9. Sugár ................................................................................ 20 2.10. Campona........................................................................... 20 3. SUMMARY....................................................................................... 21 REFERENCES...................................................................................... 22 1. TYPOLOGY OF converted
  • Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Overview TT2020

    Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Overview TT2020

    Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Overview TT2020 1 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2020 Version Control VERSION AUTHOR DATE CHANGES 1.0 PMO 08/06/2019 First draft version TT2019 1.0 PMO 12/06/2019 Corrections by the members 2.0 PMO 30/07/2019 Final draft version TT2019 2.0 PMO 12/09/2019 GA Approval TT2019 2.0 PMO 26/09/2019 TAG/RAG Approval TT2019 3.0 PMO 11/03/2020 Final draft version TT2020 3.0 PMO 24/03/2020 GA Approval TT2020 3.0 PMO 08/04/2020 TAG/RAG Approval TT2020 3.0 PMO 30/04/2020 RFI Contact change 2 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2020 Table of Contents Version Control ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Mediterranean RFC Network Map with line categories ............................................................................................ 5 Rail Freight Corridors Network Map 2020 ................................................................................................................. 5 Single/Double Track features...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. General Information ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
  • Kalmár Ádám – Results of the Joint Operations

    Kalmár Ádám – Results of the Joint Operations

    Results of the Joint Operations and trainings working group Danube Commission 15. February 2017. Budapest Ádám KALMÁR pol. Lt. Colonel Head of Division Baranya County Police Headquarters Objectives of the working group plan and organize 3 joint operations on the Danube during 2014 elaborate operation plans – (FOP with annexes and national SOP’s) work out and apply the uniform data exchange form for statistics synchronize the joint law enforcement operations in 10 countries run the Temporary Coordination Centre in Mohács, Hungary at the SEB contribute to the more exact analysis and evaluation of law enforcement risks in inland shipping with producing a joint Danube risk analysis material – the DARIF Risk Analyses Chart evaluate the operations completed and draw the conclusions, come to an arrangement with the partners about necessary changes summarize the results of joint operations, supply data to the law enforcement bodies of the participating countries make recommendations on the possibilities of similar joint operations and trainings in the future Page 33 Thematic meetings of the working group . Three thematic workshops were held during the project with 10-15 experts in the team of working group . Experts delegated from Each DARIF state, EU Agencies such as Europol, FRONTEX, Aquapol and the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) in Moldova and Ukraine . They had experiences in the areas of organising and synchronizing joint law enforcement operations and actions. Summary of the technical workshops: • Joint Operations (JO’s) should be multi-purpose operations • JO’s should focus on documents of seamen, illegal immigration, searching of ships but also to tackle against environmental pollution.
  • Hungary 2023 City: Gödöllő

    Hungary 2023 City: Gödöllő

    EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE HUNGARY 2023 CANDIDATE CITY: GÖDÖLLő 1 ENGAGE & SHARE HUNGARY 2023 City: Gödöllő TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction – General considerations 3. The town of Gödöllő is ready for the opportunity and challenge offered by the title of the Eu- ropean Capital of Culture, and ready to offer the model of a culturally lively European small town by incorporating its traditions into a continuous renewal expected by our modern age. 1. Contribution to the long-term strategy 11. The title of the European Capital of Culture offers a unique opportunity for Gödöllő for an ur- ban development way ensuring a liveable, high quality town-life, where taking responsibility by the young generation and their engagement towards the town is strengthened, where talents are supported and the number of culture consumers is increased. 2. European dimension 18. Gödöllő enjoys good, continuous cultural-artistic relations with its twin-cities, which projects the presentation of several European small-city cultural models. Networking is strengthened by European-wide open calls. Building partnerships with other ECoC cities contributes to the society forming and future oriented role of culture. 3. Cultural and artistic content 22. Engage&Share – The Gödöllő 2023 programme strengthens further the high standard artistic activity of our town, strengthens the engagement of culture-makers and culture-consumers, which we also share with the widest possible public. 4. Capacity to deliver 54. The preparation process for the title of the European Capital of Culture strengthens the co- operation among actors working for the town of Gödöllő, and specifically among actors in cultural and artistic fields, rethinks and stabilizes the cultural life and activity, the cultural infrastructure and relationship with its audience on long-term.
  • Engl Hungary State District Zalaerdö AG 2017Doc

    Engl Hungary State District Zalaerdö AG 2017Doc

    Hungary 2017 State dictrict For estry Zalaerdö PLC Office Germany: Office Austria: Ziegelstadel 1 · D-88316 Isny Europastr. 1/1 · A-7540 Güssing Phone: +49 (0) 75 62 / 914 54 - 14 Phone: +43 (0) 33 22 / 42 963 - 0 www.blaser-safaris.com Fax.: +43 (0) 33 22 / 42 963 - 59 [email protected] The Zalaed ő Company lies in western Hungary in the Zala Hills and stretches from the village of Bak to the Slovenian border and manages the biggest oak and beech forest in Hungary. The most important game species are red deer and wild boars. The quality of the red deer in this area is world famous. The stags in this area reach an age of 14-16 years when their enormous antlers obtain the biggest size. For estry • HUNTING AREA: 22.600 ha with 40 % woodland (beech and oak) Bánokszentgyörgy • NATURAL FEATURES: Hilly terrain District • ACCOMMODATION: Hunting lodge Szentpéterfölde main house cl. I, 6 double rooms Szentpéterfölde & Hunting lodge Szentpéterfölde out building cl. I, 4 double rooms Marki Hunting lodge Márki cl. I, 6 double rooms Hunting lodge Szentpéterfölde main house Hunting lodge Szentpéterfölde out building Main house Out building Hunting lodge Márki - 2 - District • HUNTING AREA: 24,000 ha with 50 % woodland Lenti : • NATURAL FEATURES: Hilly terrain • ACCOMMOD ATION: Hunting lodge Olgamajor cl. I, 13 twin bed rooms Hunting lodge Pusztapáti cl. I, 7 twin bed rooms Hunting lodge Olgamajor Hunting lodge Pusztapáti District • HUNTING AREA: 13,000 ha with 75 % woodland Letenye : • NATURAL FEATURES : Hilly terrain • ACCOMMODATION: Hunting lodge Budafa cl. I, 6 twin bed rooms - 3 - District • HUNTING AREA: 5,600 ha with 40 % woodland (beech & oak), 206 ha wild boar fence Nagykanizsa • NATURAL FEATURES : Hilly terrain.
  • Studia Botanica Hungarica 38. 2007 (Budapest, 2007)

    Studia Botanica Hungarica 38. 2007 (Budapest, 2007)

    Studia bot. hung. 38, pp. 155-178, 2007 THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF GÖDI LÁPRÉT NEAR GÖD, PEST COUNTY, HUNGARY GY. SZOLLÁT1, T. SEREGÉLYES! 2, Á. S. CSOMÓS2 and T. STANDOVÁR3 1 Department of Botany, Hungarian Natural History Museum H-1476Budapest, Pf. 222, Hungary; [email protected] ~Botanikus Bt., H-2481 Velence, Tünde u. 5, Hungary; [email protected] ^Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Eötvös Loránd University H-l 117Budapest, Pázmány P. stny. 1/c, Hungary; [email protected] The present study is an overview of the vegetation of the Gödi Láprét (meaning the "Fen at Göd") over the years from 1992 to date. The introduction contains a brief account on the tortu­ ous conservation history of the area in context of the subsequent commercialisation of certain parts of the land. The main botanical merits of the area are the fens and their transition to the ad­ jacent sandy vegetation. Conservationally, the fens are of national significance; the sandy areas are nearly intact in two small patches but otherwise rather degraded. The whole area harbours 33 protected and 2 strictly protected plant species, part of the presently recorded flora of 325. Key words: flora, Gödi Láprét, nature conservation, protected plant species, vegetation map INTRODUCTION The Gödi Láprét came into the frontline of interest in 1986, when a staff member at the Danube Research Station in Göd, Tamásné Rath, has first drawn attention to the botanical values of the area. In the following year several other botanists surveyed the area and found it botanically out­ standing. A local voluntary conservationist organisation in Göd initiated the preservation of the area in a proposal submitted to the Budapest Office of the National Bureau for Environment and Nature.
  • Spatial Aggregation and Robustness of Regionally Estimated Elasticities

    Spatial Aggregation and Robustness of Regionally Estimated Elasticities

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Békés, Gábor; Harasztosi, Péter Working Paper Grid and shake - Spatial aggregation and robustness of regionally estimated elasticities IEHAS Discussion Papers, No. MT-DP - 2015/26 Provided in Cooperation with: Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Suggested Citation: Békés, Gábor; Harasztosi, Péter (2015) : Grid and shake - Spatial aggregation and robustness of regionally estimated elasticities, IEHAS Discussion Papers, No. MT-DP - 2015/26, ISBN 978-615-5447-88-4, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Budapest This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129848 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten,
  • Individual Regional Baseline Report on Low Carbon Investments Funding – Southern Great Plain Region

    Individual Regional Baseline Report on Low Carbon Investments Funding – Southern Great Plain Region

    CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP BUDAPEST, 29 October, 2019 Individual Regional Baseline Report on Low Carbon Investments Funding – Southern Great Plain Region PROSPECT2030 | AACM Central Europe | Károly Oelberg INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Introduction Types of Funding Decentralised Other EU Funding in initiatives Hungary – Operational Programmes Joint EU/IFI National Cooperation with initiatives initiatives private stakeholders TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2 INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Types of investments funding 1. Decentralised funds made available from the ESI Funds 2. EU low-carbon initiatives 3. EU low-carbon initiatives in collaboration with IFIs 4. National funding schemes 5. Cooperation with private stakeholders TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3 INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Decentralised EU funds in Hungary Total budget: 29 730 million EUR Total EU fund: 25 013 million EUR Relevant OP budget: 16 569 million EUR Relevant OP EU funding: 14 341 million EUR Relevant PA budget: 2 744 million EUR Relevant PA EU funding: 2 389 million EUR TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4 INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Economic Development and Innovation OP PRIORITY AXES: ▪ Priority axis 1: Increasing the competitiveness and productivity of SMEs ▪ Priority axis 2: Research, technological development and innovation ▪ Priority axis 3: Info-communication developments ▪ Priority axis 4: Energy ▪ Priority axis 5: Employment ▪ Priority axis 6: Competitive labour force ▪ Priority axis 7: Tourism ▪ Priority
  • AMAZON of EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-Economic Analysis of Tourism Potentials

    AMAZON of EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-Economic Analysis of Tourism Potentials

    AMAZON OF EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) DTP2-002-2.2 AOE BIKE TRAIL Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Project AoE Bike Trail, DTP2-002-2.2 Work package: WP3: Product development Output Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Authors Anja Krajnik, Urška Dolinar, Tatjana Marn Institution Iskriva, Institute for Development of Local Potentials Date April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Acknowledgment We would like to thank all participants who actively contributed with their inputs and comments during preparation of the Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials of the Amazon of Europe area: Municipality of Velika Polana (Damijan Jaklin, Nina Lebar) WWF Austria (Stefanie Edelmüller, Arno Mohl) Trail Angels (Günter Mussnig, Rudi Trinko) Tourism Association Bad Radkersburg (Belinda Schagerl-Poandl, Christian Contola) Tourism Board Međimurje (Petra Murković, Iva Vurušić Mađarić, Rudi Grula) Public instituton for nature protection of Virovitca-Podravina County (Tatjana Arnold Sabo, Sabina Hranic, Antun Damjan) Public Institution County Development Agency of Osijek-Baranja County (Adela Sadiković, Ivana Kišćinal) Koprivnica Križevci County (Vladimir Šadek, Emilija Cvelber, Snježana Babok Grgić) WWF Adria (Ivana Korn Varga, Ana Kuzmanić, Lana Jurić) West-Pannon RDA Ltd. (Ádám Bolyós, Máté Deák, Tibor Polgár, Bejczy Delinke) Balaton-felvidéki Natonal Park Directorate (Csaba
  • Kalocsa Város Településfejlesztési Koncepciója – MEGALAPOZÓ VIZSGÁLAT ÉS CÉLFA

    Kalocsa Város Településfejlesztési Koncepciója – MEGALAPOZÓ VIZSGÁLAT ÉS CÉLFA

    VÁROSÉPÍTÉSI TANÁCSADÓ ÉS TERVEZŐ IRODA KFT. KALOCSA VÁROS TELEPÜLÉSFEJLESZTÉSI KONCEPCIÓJA MEGALAPOZÓ VIZSGÁLAT ÉS CÉLFA ÉRSEKI PALOTA 2016. DECEMBER HÓNAP VÁROSÉPÍTÉSI TANÁCSADÓ ÉS TERVEZŐ IRODA KORLÁTOLT FELELŐSSÉGŰ TÁRSASÁG SZÉKHELY: 1085 BUDAPEST, JÓZSEF KÖRÚT 29. • TELEFON: (36 1) 413-0959 • HONLAP: HTTP:// VATIKFT.HU/ TARTALOMJEGYZÉK HELYZETFELTÁRÓ, HELYZETELEMZŐ MUNKARÉSZ 1.1. Településhálózati összefüggések, a település helye a településhálózatban, térségi kapcsolatok ... 6 1.2. A területfejlesztési dokumentumokkal való összefüggések vizsgálata .......................................... 10 1.2.1. Európa 2020 stratégia ............................................................................................................. 10 1.2.2. Az Európai Unió 2014-2020-ra vonatkozó tematikus céljai .................................................... 11 1.2.3. Nemzeti Fejlesztés 2030 – Országos Fejlesztési és Területfejlesztési Koncepció ................... 12 1.2.4. Terület- és településfejlesztési Operatív Program (TOP) ........................................................ 15 1.2.5. Partnerségi Megállapodás ....................................................................................................... 16 1.2.6. Ágazati stratégiák .................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.7. Bács-Kiskun Megye Területfejlesztési Koncepciója 2014-2030 ............................................... 18 1.2.8. Bács-Kiskun Megye Területfejlesztési Programja ...................................................................
  • European Commission

    European Commission

    C 171/12 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.5.2020 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2020/C 171/07) This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATING THE APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Duna/Dunai’ Reference number PDO-HU-A1345-AM02 Date of communication: 9.2.2020 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Addition of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora, Újszilvás and Bácsszentgyörgy to the demarcated area (a) Product specification headings affected: IV. Demarcated area (b) Single document heading affected: Demarcated geographical area (c) Reasons: — The Wine Community Council of the Kunság Region (Kunsági Borvidék Hegyközségi Tanácsa) amended the product specification for the ‘Kunság/Kunsági’ PDO. The areas of the municipalities of Kömpöc, Petőfiszállás, Pálmonostora and Újszilvás classified as Class I and II according to the vineyard cadastre of wine-producing regions were added to the demarcated area. The change affects the demarcated area in the product specification for the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO and has been included in this application. The characteristics of the areas included in the vineyard cadastre correspond to the demarcated area of the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO. Vine-growing is one of the traditional economic activities of local inhabitants. The classification of the wine region and the possibility to produce the ‘Duna/Dunai’ PDO generates significant employment and income in these municipalities and contributes greatly towards the local tourism industry.