Fossils Are Generally Defined As Any Direct Or Indirect Evidence of Pre-Historic Life (Excluding Those Fossil-Like Objects That
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												  A Comparative Study of the Primary Vascular System OfAmer. J. Bot. 55(4): 464-472. 1!16'>. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PRIMARY VASCULAR SYSTE~1 OF CONIFERS. III. STELAR EVOLUTION IN GYMNOSPERMS 1 KADAMBARI K. NAMBOODIRI2 AND CHARLES B. BECK Department of Botany, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ABST RAe T This paper includes a survey of the nature of the primary vascular system in a large number of extinct gymnosperms and progymnosperms. The vascular system of a majority of these plants resembles closely that of living conifers, being characterized, except in the most primitive forms which are protostelic, by a eustele consisting of axial sympodial bundles from which leaf traces diverge. The vascular supply to a leaf originates as a single trace with very few exceptions. It is proposed that the eustele in the gyrr.nosperms has evolved directly from the protostele by gradual medullation and concurrent separation of the peripheral conducting tissue into longitudinal sympodial bundles from which traces diverge radially. A subsequent modification results in divergence of traces in a tangential plane, The closed vascular system of conifers with opposite and whorled phyllotaxis, in which the vascular supply to a leaf originates as two traces which subsequently fuse, is considered to be derived from the open sympodial system characteristic of most gymnosperms. This hypothesis of stelar evolution is at variance with that of Jeffrey which suggests that the eustele of seed plants is derived by the lengthening and overlapping of leaf gaps in a siphonostele followed by further reduction in the resultant vascular bundles. This study suggests strongly that the "leaf gap" of conifers and other extant gymnosperms is not homologous with that of siphonostelic ferns and strengthens the validity of the view that Pterop sida is an unnatural group.
- 
												  Prepared in Cooperation with the Lllinois State Museum, SpringfieldPrepared in cooperation with the lllinois State Museum, Springfield Richard 1. Leary' and Hermann W. Pfefferkorn2 ABSTRACT The Spencer Farm Flora is a compression-impression flora of early Pennsylvanian age (Namurian B, or possibly Namurian C) from Brown County, west-central Illinois. The plant fossils occur in argillaceous siltstones and sand- stones of the Caseyville Formation that were deposited in a ravine eroded in Mississippian carbonate rocks. The plant-bearing beds are the oldest deposits of Pennsylva- nian age yet discovered in Illinois. They were formed be- fore extensive Pennsylvanian coal swamps developed. The flora consists of 29 species and a few prob- lematical forms. It represents an unusual biofacies, in which the generally rare genera Megalopteris, Lesleya, Palaeopteridium, and Lacoea are quite common. Noegger- athiales, which are seldom present in roof-shale floras, make up over 20 percent of the specimens. The Spencer Farm Flora is an extrabasinal (= "upland1') flora that was grow- ing on the calcareous soils in the vicinity of the ravine in which they were deposited. It is suggested here that the Noeggerathiales may belong to the Progymnosperms and that Noeggerathialian cones might be derived from Archaeopteris-like fructifica- tions. The cone genus Lacoea is intermediate between Noeggerathiostrobus and Discini tes in its morphology. Two new species, Lesleya cheimarosa and Rhodeop- teridi urn phillipsii , are described, and Gulpenia limbur- gensis is reported from North America for the first time. INTRODUCTION The Spencer Farm Flora (table 1) differs from other Pennsylvanian floras of the Illinois Basin. Many genera and species in the Spencer Farm Flora either have not been found elsewhere in the basin or are very l~uratorof Geology, Illinois State Museum, Springfield.
- 
												  Dr. Sahanaj Jamil Associate Professor of Botany M.L.S.M. College, DarbhangaSubject BOTANY Paper No V Paper Code BOT521 Topic Taxonomy and Diversity of Seed Plant: Gymnosperms & Angiosperms Dr. Sahanaj Jamil Associate Professor of Botany M.L.S.M. College, Darbhanga BOTANY PG SEMESTER – II, PAPER –V BOT521: Taxonomy and Diversity of seed plants UNIT- I BOTANY PG SEMESTER – II, PAPER –V BOT521: Taxonomy and Diversity of seed plants Classification of Gymnosperms. # Robert Brown (1827) for the first time recognized Gymnosperm as a group distinct from angiosperm due to the presence of naked ovules. BENTHAM and HOOKSER (1862-1883) consider them equivalent to dicotyledons and monocotyledons and placed between these two groups of angiosperm. They recognized three classes of gymnosperm, Cyacadaceae, coniferac and gnetaceae. Later ENGLER (1889) created a group Gnikgoales to accommodate the genus giankgo. Van Tieghem (1898) treated Gymnosperm as one of the two subdivision of spermatophyte. To accommodate the fossil members three more classes- Pteridospermae, Cordaitales, and Bennettitales where created. Coulter and chamberlain (1919), Engler and Prantl (1926), Rendle (1926) and other considered Gymnosperm as a division of spermatophyta, Phanerogamia or Embryoptyta and they further divided them into seven orders: - i) Cycadofilicales ii) Cycadales iii) Bennettitales iv) Ginkgoales v) Coniferales vi) Corditales vii) Gnetales On the basis of wood structure steward (1919) divided Gymnosperm into two classes: - i) Manoxylic ii) Pycnoxylic The various classification of Gymnosperm proposed by various workers are as follows: - i) Sahni (1920): - He recognized two sub-divison in gymnosperm: - a) Phylospermae b) Stachyospermae BOTANY PG SEMESTER – II, PAPER –V BOT521: Taxonomy and Diversity of seed plants ii) Classification proposed by chamber lain (1934): - He divided Gymnosperm into two divisions: - a) Cycadophyta b) Coniterophyta iii) Classification proposed by Tippo (1942):- He considered Gymnosperm as a class of the sub- phylum pteropsida and divided them into two sub classes:- a) Cycadophyta b) Coniferophyta iv) D.
- 
												  Ecological Sorting of Vascular Plant Classes During the Paleozoic Evolutionary Radiationi1 Ecological Sorting of Vascular Plant Classes During the Paleozoic Evolutionary Radiation William A. DiMichele, William E. Stein, and Richard M. Bateman DiMichele, W.A., Stein, W.E., and Bateman, R.M. 2001. Ecological sorting of vascular plant classes during the Paleozoic evolutionary radiation. In: W.D. Allmon and D.J. Bottjer, eds. Evolutionary Paleoecology: The Ecological Context of Macroevolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 285-335 THE DISTINCTIVE BODY PLANS of vascular plants (lycopsids, ferns, sphenopsids, seed plants), corresponding roughly to traditional Linnean classes, originated in a radiation that began in the late Middle Devonian and ended in the Early Carboniferous. This relatively brief radiation followed a long period in the Silurian and Early Devonian during wrhich morphological complexity accrued slowly and preceded evolutionary diversifications con- fined within major body-plan themes during the Carboniferous. During the Middle Devonian-Early Carboniferous morphological radiation, the major class-level clades also became differentiated ecologically: Lycopsids were cen- tered in wetlands, seed plants in terra firma environments, sphenopsids in aggradational habitats, and ferns in disturbed environments. The strong con- gruence of phylogenetic pattern, morphological differentiation, and clade- level ecological distributions characterizes plant ecological and evolutionary dynamics throughout much of the late Paleozoic. In this study, we explore the phylogenetic relationships and realized ecomorphospace of reconstructed whole plants (or composite whole plants), representing each of the major body-plan clades, and examine the degree of overlap of these patterns with each other and with patterns of environmental distribution. We conclude that 285 286 EVOLUTIONARY PALEOECOLOGY ecological incumbency was a major factor circumscribing and channeling the course of early diversification events: events that profoundly affected the structure and composition of modern plant communities.
- 
												  An Overview of the Fossil Record of Climbers: Bejucos, Sogas, Trepadoras, Lianas, Cipós, and VinesRev. bras. paleontol. 12(2):149-160, Maio/Agosto 2009 © 2009 by the Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia doi:10.4072/rbp.2009.2.05 AN OVERVIEW OF THE FOSSIL RECORD OF CLIMBERS: BEJUCOS, SOGAS, TREPADORAS, LIANAS, CIPÓS, AND VINES ROBYN J. BURNHAM Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA. [email protected] ABSTRACT – One of the most obvious life forms in tropical forests today is the liana, which laces together tree canopies and climbs the dark interiors of forests with snake-like stems. Lianas are ecologically important in extant, forested ecosystems, both intact and disturbed. Their contribution to forest diversity, food resources, structural complexity, and plant-animal interactions are recognized, but rarely studied. Climbers (woody lianas and herbaceous vines) are viewed as everything from diversity contributors to forest growth inhibitors by modern ecologists and systematists. Climbers take advantage of the structural support of trees to invest proportionately more in vegetative and reproductive organs, resulting in proliferation at the individual and species level. Today the climbing habit is dominated by angiosperm species, with only a minor contribution from ferns plus a single non-angiosperm seed plant genus, Gnetum. This contribution reports the establishment of the newly established database, Fossil Record of Climbers (FRC) that documents more than 1100 records of climbing plants from the Paleozoic to the Quaternary using published literature on the fossil record. The diversity of climbers in the fossil record prior to the evolution of angiosperms is explored, posing the hypothesis that climbers of the past had a similarly important role in tropical forests, at least in the Paleozoic.
- 
												  Characteristics of the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian Boundary and Associated Coal-Bearing Rocks in the Southern AppalachiansCHARACTERISTICS OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN-PENNSYLVANIAN BOUNDARY AND ASSOCIATED COAL-BEARING ROCKS IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS By Kenneth J. England, William H. Gillespie, C. Blaine Cecil, and John F. Windolph, Jr. U.S. Geological Survey and Thomas J. Crawford West Georgia College with contributions by Cortland F. Eble West Virginia Geological Survey Lawrence J. Rheams Alabama Geological Survey and Roger E. Thomas U.S. Geological Survey USQS Open-File Report 85-577 1985 This report la preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or atratlgraphic nomenclature. CONTENTS Page Characteristics of the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian boundary and associated coal-bearing strata in the central Appalachian basin. Kenneth J. Englund and Roger E. Thomas.................................... 1 Upper Mississippian and Lower Pennsylvanian Series in the southern Appalachians. Thomas J. Crawford........................................................ 9 Biostratigraphic significance of compression-impression plant fossils near the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian boundary in the southern Appalachians. William H. Gillespie, Thomas J. Crawford and Lawrence J. Rheams........... 11 Miospores in Pennsylvanian coal beds of the southern Appalachian basin and their stratigraphic implications. Cortland F. Eble, William H. Gillespie, Thomas J. Crawford, and Lawrence J. Rheams...................................................... 19 Geologic controls on sedimentation and peat formation in the Carboniferous of the Appalachian
- 
												  Early Seed Plants from Western Gondwana: Paleobiogeographical and Ecological Implications Based on Tournaisian (Lower Carboniferous) Records from ArgentinaPalaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 417 (2015) 210–219 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Early seed plants from Western Gondwana: Paleobiogeographical and ecological implications based on Tournaisian (Lower Carboniferous) records from Argentina C. Prestianni a,⁎, J.J. Rustán b,d, D. Balseiro b,c,E.Vaccarib,d, A.F. Sterren b,c, P. Steemans e, C. Rubinstein f,R.A.Astinib a Paleontology Department, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium b Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra (CICTERRA), CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Edificio CICTERRA Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611, X5016GCA, Ciudad Universitaria, Córdoba, Argentina c Centro de Investigaciones Paleobiológicas (CIPAL), FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Velez Sarsfield 299, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina d Universidad Nacional de La Rioja, Av. René Favaloro s/n 5300, La Rioja, Argentina e Unité de Paléobiogéologie, Paléopalynologie et Paléobotanique, Dpt. de Géologie, Université de Liege, B18/P40 Boulevard du Rectorat, 4000 Liege, Belgium f Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA): CCT CONICET-Mendoza, Av. Ruiz Leal s/n, Parque General San Martín M5502IRA, Mendoza, Argentina article info abstract Article history: The oldest seed occurrences in Western Gondwana have been recognized in a new stratigraphic section located Received 28 May 2014 in Western Argentina (Precordillera Basin). Palynological evidence indicates an Early Mississippian (probably Received in revised form 21 October 2014 Tournaisian) age for this new succession. The two identified early seeds generas, Pseudosporogonites cf. hallei Accepted 29 October 2014 and Warsteinia sancheziae n. sp. were up to now considered as restricted to the Devonian of Laurussia.
- 
												  Lyginopteris Royalii Sp. Nov. from the Upper Mississippian of North AmericaReview of Palaeobotany and Palynology 116 (2001) 159±173 www.elsevier.com/locate/revpalbo Lyginopteris royalii sp. nov. from the Upper Mississippian of North America Alexandru Mihail Florian Tomescu*, Gar W. Rothwell, Gene Mapes Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA Received 22 August 2000; accepted for publication 6 February 2001 Abstract A new species of the seed fern Lyginopteris is described from a nodule in Upper Mississippian (middle Chesterian-Namurian A) shales of the Fayetteville Formation in northwestern Arkansas. The pyritized stem is 29 cm long and slightly compressed, with a diameter of about 11 £ 5 mm, and shows seven diverging leaf bases. The primary xylem of the specimen is eustelic. Foliar bundles extend through ®ve internodes before entering the rachis bases; they do not divide along their trajectory through the stem. Phyllotaxis of the specimen approaches 2/5. Longitudinally oriented sclerenchyma strands accompany the diverging foliar vascular bundles adaxially in the cortex, and are incorporated in the outer cortex above the level of foliar rachis divergence. In contrast to previously described Lyginopteris species, this species lacks capitate epidermal glands. A Lygino- pteris type rachis with a paired vascular bundle is preserved in the same nodule. Coprolites probably produced by oribatid mites are present in different tissues of the stem. The study of the leaf trace divergence necessitated the use of a deformation model to help reconstruct the original position of the cauline bundles in the compressed stele. This occurrence of Lyginopteris con®rms earlier reports of the genus from North America and emphasizes that it was not restricted to Western Europe.
- 
												  Studies of Paleozoic Seed Ferns: Anatomy and Morphology of Morphology of Microspermopteris AphyllumAmer. J. Bot. 63(10): 1302-1310. 1976. STUDIES OF PALEOZOIC SEED FERNS: ANATOMY AND MORPHOLOGY OF MICROSPERMOPTERIS APHYLLUM1 THOMAS N. TAYLOR AND RUTH A. STOCKEY Departmentof Botany,The Ohio State University,Columbus 43210 A B S T R A C T The discoveryof numerousspecimens of the monostelicpteridosperm genus Microspermop- teris in Pennsylvaniancoal ball petrifactionsfrom the Lewis Creek and What Cheer localities providesadditional information about the anatomicaland morphologicalvariability within thegenus. Specimensare now knownup to 1.1 cm in diam thatbear epidermalappendages in theform of variously-shapedtrichomes. The externalsurface of the stemis furtherornamented by longitudinalflaps of corticaltissue. Petiolesexhibiting a singleC-shaped vascular strand with abaxial protoxylemare producedin a 2/5 phyllotaxy.Large petiole bases that clasp the stemproduce primary pinnae alternately. The presenceof axillarybranching appears simi- lar to thatreported in Callistophytonand Lyginopteris. Triarchto polyarchadventitious roots, some withsecondary tissues, are producedat both nodal and internodalregions. Of the cur- rentlyrecognized monostelic seed ferngenera, Microspermopteris is most similarto Heter- angium. Informationis presentedthat supportscurrent ideas regardingthe evolutionof the gymnospermiceustele from protostelic Devonian ancestors. THE GENUS MICROSPERMOPTERISwas initiallyde- axes representingnumerous orders of branching. scribedby Baxter (1949) frompetrifaction ma- Specimens were collected fromthe What Cheer terial collected fromthe
- 
												  Triassic Floras of Antarctica: Plant Diversity and Distribution in High Paleolatitude CommunitiesPALAIOS, 2011, v. 26, p. 522–544 Research Article DOI: 10.2110/palo.2010.p10-122r TRIASSIC FLORAS OF ANTARCTICA: PLANT DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION IN HIGH PALEOLATITUDE COMMUNITIES IGNACIO H. ESCAPA,1,2* EDITH L. TAYLOR,1 RUBE´ NCU´ NEO,2 BENJAMIN BOMFLEUR,1,3 JULIE BERGENE,1 RUDOLPH SERBET,1 and THOMAS N. TAYLOR 1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-7534, USA, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; 2CONICET—Museo Paleontolo´gico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew, Chubut, 9100, Argentina, [email protected]; 3Forschungsstelle fu¨r Pala¨obotanik am Institut fu¨r Geologie und Pala¨ontologie, Westfa¨lische Wilhelms-Universita¨t Mu¨nster, Hindenburgplatz 57, D-48143 Mu¨nster, Germany, [email protected] ABSTRACT number of Antarctic plant fossils during his career. His collection—now at the University of Kansas—includes plants preserved as impressions Continental Triassic sequences in Antarctica are among the most and compressions, palynological samples, and silicified wood from continuous and best represented in Gondwana. Triassic fossil plants have numerous sites, including southern and northern Victoria Land (SVL, been collected sporadically from Antarctica since the beginning of the NVL) and the CTM. twentieth century, but our knowledge of the vegetation during this time Certainly one of the most significant contributions of Schopf’s has dramatically increased during the last three decades. Here we review fieldwork in Antarctica was the discovery of permineralized peat from the fossil record of Triassic plants as representatives of natural groups two sites in the CTM (Schopf, 1970, 1978).
- 
												  Pteridophytes, Gymnosperms and Paleobotany)PLANT DIVERSITY-II (PTERIDOPHYTES, GYMNOSPERMS AND PALEOBOTANY) UNIT I: PTERIDOPHYTES General characters, Reimer’s classification (1954). Telome concept. Sporangium development – Eusporangiate type and Leptosporangiate type. Apogamy, Apospory, Heterospory and Seed habit. Detailed account on stellar evolution. UNIT II: Brief account of the morphology, structure and reproduction of the major groups- Psilophytopsida, Psilotopsida, Lycopsida, Sphenopsida and Pteropsida. (Individual type stydy is not necessary). Economic importance of Gymnoperms. UNIT III: GYMNOSPERMS General characters – Classification of Gymnosperms (Sporne, 1965), Orgin and Phylogeny of Gymnosperms, Gymnosperms compared with Pteridophytes and Angiosperms- Economic Importance of Gymnosperms. UNIT IV: A general account of distribution, morphology, anatomy, reproduction and life cycle of the following major groups – Cycadopsida (Pteridospermales, Bennettitales, Pentaxylales, Cycadales) Coniferopsida (Cordaitales, Coniferales, Ginkgoales) and Gnetopsida (Gneales). UNIT V: PALEOBOTANY Concept of Paleobotany= Geological time scale- Fossil- Fossilization- Compressions, Incrustation, Casts, Molds, Petrifactions, Compactions and Caol balls. Detailed study of the fossil forms- Pteridophytes: Lepidodendron, Calamites. Gymnosperms: Lyginopteris, Cordaites. Role of fossil in oil exploration and coa excavation, Paleopaynology. Prepared by: Unit I and II 1. Dr. A.Pauline Fathima Mary, Guest Lecturer in Botany K. N. Govt. Arts College(W), Auto., Thanjavur. Unit III and IV 1. Dr. S.Gandhimathi, Guest Lecturer in Botany, K. N. Govt. Arts College(W), Auto., Thanjavur. Unit V: 1. Dr. G.Santhi, Head and Assistant professor of Botany, K. N. Govt. Arts College(W), Auto., Thanjavur. Reference: 1. Rashid, A, (2007), An Introduction to Peridophytes- Vikas Publications, New Delhi. 2. Sporne, K.R. (1975). The Morphology of Pteridophytes, London. 3. Coultar, J. M. and Chamberin, C, J. (1976). Morphology of Gymnosperms.
- 
												  Nomenclature of FossilsNomenclature of Fossils The whole plant is not preserved, but only detached plant parts like stem, root, cone, leaf, etc. are preserved as fossils. These detached plant parts are being discovered in different times by different authors. Thus, the detached plant parts or organs are given name on the basis of Binomial Nomenclature (“generic and specific name”) acc.to rules of International Code of Botanical Nomenclature which have been framed for living plants. The first valid description of Lepidodendron came into existence from the publication of Sternberg in 1820. Thus, this date has been considered as the starting point of palaeobotanical nomenclature. Each detached organs or fragments is given a different name. Each of these names acquires the status of a genus. The generic name in fossils is applicable for only a plant part like root, stem, leaf, cone or other organ, without indicating to what plant is belongs. Thus, the genus is termed form genus or artificial genus in contrast to natural genus for living plants. A form genus cannot reliably be assigned to a single family; however, it may be assigned to an order or other higher taxonomical rank. For example, Stigmaria is a form genus of the order Lepidodendrales which cannot be assigned to any one of the three families: Lepidodendraceae, Sigillariaceae or Bothrodendraceae. When the relationships among different organs like stem, root, leaf and reproductive structures are established and can be assigned to the same family, then the genera can be called organ genera. For example, stem genus Bucklandia, leaf genus Ptilophyllum, male fructification Weltrichia and female fructification Williamsonia are genetically related and assigned to the same family Williamsoniaceae.