Thrust Fault Geometry of the Snake River Range, Idaho and Wyoming

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thrust Fault Geometry of the Snake River Range, Idaho and Wyoming Thrust fault geometry of the Snake River Range, Idaho and Wyoming NICHOLAS B. WOODWARD Department of Geological Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 ABSTRACT the Sevier thrust belt interacted with the Ancestral Teton or Targhee uplift. The large number of thrusts in the Snake River Range and the The Snake River Range is located at the north end of the Absa- truncated folds and thrusts shown by Rubey (1958) and Eardley (1960) roka fault system in the Idaho-Wyoming-Utah thrust belt, and it ad- have led others to suggest that the imbrication occurred from east tc west joins the Teton Mountains. Nine imbricate sheets of the Absaroka at the buttress (break-back sequence) (Kopania, 1983; Wiltschko and system form a shingled array of overlapping thrusts. Most fault no- Eastman, 1983). This is contrary to the over-all hinterland-to-foreland menclature in the range dates from early, discontinuous, reconnais- thrusting sequence described by Armstrong and Oriel (1965), Oriel and sance studies wherein names were applied from the top thrust down whether or not the thrust sheets separated by this method are, or ever were, connected as mechanical blocks. Fault names are revised here to consider the later: J continuity of sheets as the major criteria for defin- ing the block to w hich a name should be applied. The Absaroka thrust and St. John thrust are recognized to be equivalent different parts of a major transfer zone, using the continuity of sheets as the main criteria. The map pattern of the range is dominated by major re-entrants to the west in the traces of the St. John and Absaroka thrusts. The re-entrants in both major faults are caused by folding in their foot walls related to lateral ramping of each thrust upward to the south- east. The folding of the St. John thrust above the Indian Creek Culmination also folds the thrust sheets above it, helping to mark the emplacement of the imbricate sheets as being from top to bottom and west to east. The Absaroka system thrusts formed from 20 to 40 km west of their present position. They are folded by underlying faults of the Jackson or, farther south, the Darby system, indicating that the Ab- saroka system wsis emplaced into its present position by motion on these underlying faults. Discussions concerning mechanical interac- tion between the thrust belt and a foreland buttress (ancestral Teton or Targhee uplift) concentrate on intensities of deformation and changes in geometry adjacent to the proposed buttress. The individual imbricate geometries and regional changes in trend are more related to a changing stratigraphic package and the lateral thrust ramps than to geographic proximity to any proposed buttress. INTRODUCTION The Snake Ri ver Range is located at the northern end of the Idaho- Wyoming-Utah thrust belt. It adjoins the Tetons and Jackson Hole, Wyoming, to the northeast (Fig. 1). The main mountains are composed of imbricated thrust sheets of resistant Paleozoic rocks of the Absaroka thrust system, whereas the eastern foothills up to Teton Pass are composed of resistant folded and faulted Mesozoic rocks within the Jackson (Prospect) thrust sheet. The structures are unconformably overlain by Tertiary clastics and volcanoclastici of the Snake River Plain to the north and northwest. The area is interesting because of its excellent exposures of thrust faults and thrust-related structures. Horberg and others (1949) and Rubey (1955) suggested that it is this area where the Idaho-Wyoming thrust belt Figure 1. Generalized map of the Wyoming salient of the Cordil- "ran into" the Teton Mountains "buttress." Although the present Teton leran fold and thrust belt. The largest area in the north is occupied by Range is very young, Love (1983, and references therein) maintained that the Absaroka thrust sheet. Geological Society o f America Bulletin, v. 97, p. 178-193, 13 figs., February 1986. 178 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/97/2/178/3434629/i0016-7606-97-2-178.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 Figure 2. The stratigraphie units exposed in the Snake River Range are from Cambrian to Cretaceous in age (generalized from 700+meters Frontier U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle mapping and the author's measured sections). Isopach trends in Paleozoic rocks crosscut the range from northeast to southwest so that thicknesses are 700 + Aspen approximations. 240 Bear River Armstrong (1966), Wiltschko and Dorr (1983), and to data presented here. This paper focuses on the geometry of the many thrusts of the ï=m 135 Gannett Absaroka system. The relative timing of the Mosquito Pass and Jackson i5cr~ Stump S Preuss thrusts, which occur between the Absaroka fault and the Teton Block 240 Twin Creek (Fig. 3), is discussed only briefly. 120 Nugget 120 Ankareh PREVIOUS WORK 240 Thaynes The most recent mapping in this mountain range was by U.S. Geo- 300 Woodside logical Survey geologists in the 1960s and 1970s. This work includes 160 Dinwoody 1:31,360 maps of the Driggs (Pampeyan and others, 1967) and Gams 60 Phosphoria Mountain quadrangles (Staatz and Albee, 1966) 1:24,000 maps of the Conant Valley (Jobin and Schroeder, 1964a), Thompson Peak (Jobin and 300 Wells Soister, 1964), Palisades Peak (Jobin, 1965), Teton Pass (Schroeder, 150 Amsden 1969), Observation Peak (Albee, 1973), Alpine (Albee and Cullens, (paleokarst) 1975), Ferry Peak (Jobin, 1972), and Pine Creek quadrangles (Schroeder 300 Mission Canyon and others, 1981). Previously, Gardner (1961) mapped part of the area; 160 Lodqepole and, during the 1940s, students from the University of Michigan field 120 Darby station at Camp Davis (see reference list for individuals) mapped and I 20 Bighorn 60 Gallatin named many of the thrusts. The Mount Baird and NEW the Palisades Dam 300 Gros Ventre quadrangle were mapped by the writer in 1978 and 1979 to connect the structures in the northern and southern parts of the range. The Michigan 300 meters Flathead Fm theses and USGS reports outline the stratigraphy of the range, which is Dal summarized by Wanless and others (1955) (Fig. 2). During mapping and Figure 3. Summary map of the nine thrust sheets (Fig. 4A-I) in the Snake River Range. Their recognition is based on two major criteria: (1) continuity of stratigraphic separation along a main fault trace; (2) stratigraphic cut-off line geometry showing that sheets have consistent three-dimensional, discrete fault shapes as mechanical blocks. The positions of structure sections in Figure 5 are also shown. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/97/2/178/3434629/i0016-7606-97-2-178.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 180 N. B. WOODWARD reconnaissance to clarify fault interrelationships, it became clear that thrust traces. Structure contour maps (Figs. 4A-4I) and balanced sections (Figs. nomenclature in the range suffered from a lack of consistency. Thrust 5A-5E) illustrate the shapes of the redefined thrust sheets in the range. names which were originally established in the southern part of the range These figures are derived from the previously mentioned quadrangle maps, were carried northward erroneously, not by direct mapping, but by pre- my mapping of the Mount Baird quadrangle, and local remapping of serving the stacking sequences of thrust names from highest to lowest. A critical areas. Thrust surfaces were renamed on the basis of the new proposed simplified nomenclature is used in Figure 3 and other maps here. mapping that documented the faults separating the major thrust sheets. The contour maps include hanging-wall cutoff positions for the different THRUST FAULT GEOMETRY stratigraphic contacts in each thrust sheet on the basis of available map data. A cutoff line is the intersection of the fault with a stratigraphic The thrust sheets in Figures 3 and 4 were defined on the basis of contact. Where cutoff lines are closely spaced, the thrust cuts through the continuity of the stratigraphic section in each fault block and on the section at a high angle (a ramp); where they are broadly spaced, the thrust preservation of, or regular change in, stratigraphic separation along fault cuts through the section at a low angle (a flat). Where cutoff lines parallel Figure 4. Structure contour maps of each of the thrust sheets in the range, based on the author's mapping of thrust traces and compilation from U.S. Geological Survey quadrangles in Woodward (1981). Teton Pass is shown in each map where appropriate. A trailing edge branch line as described by Beyer and Elliott (1982) is the line along which a thrust merges with the next overlying thrust; they are the western limits of the respective thrust sheets at depth. A leading edge tip line (C) is the line separating slipped and unslipped material in front of a blind thrust. The contours for the Little Elk and Needle thrusts are on the lowest imbricates in the respective systems. Hanging-wall (HW) cut-off lines are mimed for the appropriate stratigraphic units (see Fig. 2). A. The Baldy thrust sheet. B. The Needle thrust underlies a set of imbricates of Cambrian, Ordovician, and Devonian rocks from the Grey's River north to Elk Creek, where it may correlate with one of the upper faults within the Little Elk thrust system. C. The three main imbricates of the Little Elk thrust system are well exposed in Sheep Mountain, Sheep Creek Peak and Mount Baird and Elkhorn Peak. They are numbered 1-3 from lowest to highest. D. The three-dimensional geometry of the Elk thrust sheet can be defined because of its excellent exposure. The Palisades Creek W indow (PCW) helps to define the cut-off line positions by limiting their positions along Palisades Creek.
Recommended publications
  • WPLI Resolution
    Matters from Staff Agenda Item # 17 Board of County Commissioners ‐ Staff Report Meeting Date: 11/13/2018 Presenter: Alyssa Watkins Submitting Dept: Administration Subject: Consideration of Approval of WPLI Resolution Statement / Purpose: Consideration of a resolution proclaiming conservation principles for US Forest Service Lands in Teton County as a final recommendation of the Wyoming Public Lands Initiative (WPLI) process. Background / Description (Pros & Cons): In 2015, the Wyoming County Commissioners Association (WCCA) established the Wyoming Public Lands Initiative (WPLI) to develop a proposed management recommendation for the Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) in Wyoming, and where possible, pursue other public land management issues and opportunities affecting Wyoming’s landscape. In 2016, Teton County elected to participate in the WPLI process and appointed a 21‐person Advisory Committee to consider the Shoal Creek and Palisades WSAs. Committee meetings were facilitated by the Ruckelshaus Institute (a division of the University of Wyoming’s Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources). Ultimately the Committee submitted a number of proposals, at varying times, to the BCC for consideration. Although none of the formal proposals submitted by the Teton County WPLI Committee were advanced by the Board of County Commissioners, the Board did formally move to recognize the common ground established in each of the Committee’s original three proposals as presented on August 20, 2018. The related motion stated that the Board chose to recognize as a resolution or as part of its WPLI recommendation, that all members of the WPLI advisory committee unanimously agree that within the Teton County public lands, protection of wildlife is a priority and that there would be no new roads, no new timber harvest except where necessary to support healthy forest initiatives, no new mineral extraction excepting gravel, no oil and gas exploration or development.
    [Show full text]
  • Teton Range Bighorn Sheep Herd Situation Assessment January 2020
    Teton Range Bighorn Sheep Herd Situation Assessment January 2020 Photo: A. Courtemanch Compiled by: Teton Range Bighorn Sheep Working Group Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 Introduction and Overview .................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Process ................................................................................................................. 2 Key Findings: Research Summary and Expert Panel ......................................................... 3 Key Findings: Community Outreach Efforts ....................................................................... 4 Action Items .............................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................... 6 Purpose of this Assessment .................................................................................................... 6 Background ............................................................................................................................... 6 ASSESSMENT APPROACH....................................................................................................... 6 PART 1: Research Summary and Expert Panel ................................................................... 6 Key Findings: Research Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest
    Sensitive and Rare Plant Species Inventory in the Salt River and Wyoming Ranges, Bridger-Teton National Forest Prepared for Bridger-Teton National Forest P.O. Box 1888 Jackson, WY 83001 by Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming Dept 3381, 1000 E. University Avenue University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 21 February 2012 Cooperative Agreement No. 07-CS-11040300-019 ABSTRACT Three sensitive and two other Wyoming species of concern were inventoried in the Wyoming and Salt River Ranges at over 20 locations. The results provided a significant set of trend data for Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii), expanded the known distribution of Robbin’s milkvetch (Astragalus robbinsii var. minor), and relocated and expanded the local distributions of three calciphilic species at select sites as a springboard for expanded surveys. Results to date are presented with the rest of species’ information for sensitive species program reference. This report is submitted as an interim report representing the format of a final report. Tentative priorities for 2012 work include new Payson’s milkvetch surveys in major recent wildfires, and expanded Rockcress draba (Draba globosa) surveys, both intended to fill key gaps in status information that contribute to maintenance of sensitive plant resources and information on the Forest. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All 2011 field surveys of Payson’s milkvetch (Astragalus paysonii) were conducted by Klara Varga. These and the rest of 2011 surveys built on the 2010 work of Hollis Marriott and the earlier work of she and Walter Fertig as lead botanists of Wyoming Natural Diversity Database. This project was initially coordinated by Faith Ryan (Bridger-Teton National Forest), with the current coordination and consultation of Gary Hanvey and Tyler Johnson.
    [Show full text]
  • Range Expansion and Population Growth of Non-Native Mountain
    Wildlife Society Bulletin; DOI: 10.1002/wsb.636 Original Article Range Expansion and Population Growth of Nonnative Mountain Goats in the Greater Yellowstone Area: Challenges for Management ELIZABETH P. FLESCH,1 Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Ecology Department, Montana State University, 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA ROBERT A. GARROTT, Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Ecology Department, Montana State University, 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA P. J. WHITE, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, P.O. Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190, USA DOUG BRIMEYER, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 420 N Cache, P.O. Box 67, Jackson, WY 83001, USA ALYSON B. COURTEMANCH, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 420 N Cache, P.O. Box 67, Jackson, WY 83001, USA JULIE A. CUNNINGHAM, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 1400 S 19th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA SARAH R. DEWEY, National Park Service, Grand Teton National Park, P.O. Box 170, Moose, WY 83012, USA GARY L. FRALICK, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, P.O. Box 1022, Thayne, WY 83127, USA KAREN LOVELESS, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 1354 Highway 10 W, Livingston, MT 59047, USA DOUG E. MCWHIRTER, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 2820 State Highway 120, Cody, WY 82414, USA HOLLIE MIYASAKI, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 4279 Commerce Circle, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA ANDREW PILS, United States Forest Service, Shoshone National Forest, 203A Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, WY 82414, USA MICHAEL A. SAWAYA, Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Ecology Department, Montana State University, 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA SHAWN T.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Teton National Park and John D
    From: Jackson Hole Children"s Museum To: Arne Jorgensen Subject: Time is Running Out! Date: Thursday, July 29, 2021 10:24:21 AM View this email in your browser "During a year of so much uncertainty, our family was so grateful to have the resources and support of local preschool programs at Children’s Learning Center, Jackson Hole Children’s Museum and Teton Literacy Center. It brought us peace of mind to know that there were caring, professional educators working to minimize the impact of this difficult year on our kids." – Jackson Hole Parent SEE ALL STORIES Hello friends and supporters, You’ve heard it before: kids are resilient. They’re capable of navigating big challenges and being okay. But with the help of caring teachers and peers, their chances are even better. When kids have professional support, guidance, and excellent education, they’re significantly more likely to come out of a challenging time — like the pandemic — with healthy social, emotional, and academic skills and on-track development. The Jackson Hole Children’s Museum, Teton Literacy Center, and Children’s Learning Center are dedicated to collaborating and implementing innovative programming to maximize the resilience of local kids in this critical moment. With programming that includes experience-based curricula as well as an expanded focus on social-emotional development, our organizations are teaming up to ensure that kids have every chance to be as resilient as possible. Your support of Champions for Children will empower us to continue this critical work. Healthy, happy kids make for healthy, happy families — which in turn makes for a thriving workforce, economy, and community.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Teton County, Wyoming, Exclusive of Yellowstone National Park
    WATER RESOURCES OF TETON COUNTY, WYOMING, EXCLUSIVE OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK 105° 104° U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4204 Prepared in cooperation with the WYOMING STATE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES OF TETON COUNTY, WYOMING, EXCLUSIVE OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK by Bernard T. Nolan and Kirk A. Miller U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4204 Prepared in cooperation with the WYOMING STATE ENGINEER Cheyenne, Wyoming 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director The use of trade, product, industry, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Water Resources Division Open-File Reports Section 2617 E. Lincolnway, Suite B Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 -5662 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and scope......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Plant Species of Concern on Caribou-Targhee National Forest: 2007 Survey Results
    WYOMING PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN ON CARIBOU-TARGHEE NATIONAL FOREST: 2007 Survey Results Teton and Lincoln counties, Wyoming Prepared for Caribou-Targhee National Forest By Michael Mancuso and Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY University of Wyoming Department 3381, 1000 East University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071 FS Agreement No. 06-CS-11041563-097 March 2008 ABSTRACT In 2007, the Caribou-Targhee NF contracted the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database (WYNDD) to survey for the sensitive plant species Androsace chamaejasme var. carinata (sweet- flowered rock jasmine) and Astragalus paysonii (Payson’s milkvetch). The one previously known occurrence of Androsace chamaejasme var. carinata on the Caribou-Targhee NF at Taylor Mountain was not relocated, nor was the species found in seven other target areas having potential habitat. Astragalus paysonii was found to be extant and with more plants than previously reported at the Cabin Creek occurrence. It was confirmed to be extirpated at the Station Creek Campground occurrence. During surveys for Androsace , four new occurrences of Lesquerella carinata var. carinata (keeled bladderpod) and one new occurrence of Astragalus shultziorum (Shultz’s milkvetch) were discovered. In addition, the historical Lesquerella multiceps (Wasatch bladderpod) occurrence at Ferry Peak was relocated. These are all plant species of concern in Wyoming. In addition to field survey results, a review of collections at the Rocky Mountain Herbarium (RM) led to several occurrences of Lesquerella carinata var. carinata and Lesquerella paysonii (Payson’s bladderpod) being updated in the WYNDD database . Conservation needs for Androsace chamaejasme var. carinata , Astragalus paysonii , and the three Lesquerella species were identified during the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Neogene-Quaternary Tectonics and Volcanism of Southern Jackson Hole, Wyoming and Southeastern Idaho
    Lageson and others -- Neogene-Quaternary Tectonics and Volcanism 115 Neogene-Quaternary Tectonics and Volcanism of Southern Jackson Hole, Wyoming and Southeastern Idaho David R. Lageson Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717 David C. Adams Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717 Lisa Morgan U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS-966, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Kenneth L. Pierce U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS-980, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Robert B. Smith Department of Geology and Geophysics, 717 W.C. Browning Building, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 INTRODUCTION This field trip guide focuses on the region south of the Snake volcanic rocks of the Snake River Plain Yellowstone region River Plain between Pocatello, Idaho and Jackson, Wyoming (Fig. (Adams, 1997). The second aspect involves a reinterpretation of 1). Our intent is not to rewrite the excellent geologic field guides large slide blocks found primarily within the Grand-Swan Valley that have already been published (e.g., Love and Reed, 1971; of southeast Idaho. We (Morgan and Lageson) suggest an alter- Love and Love, 1983; Love and Love, 1988; Love, 1989; Smith native hypothesis to the slow creep model of emplacement and Downs, 1989; Smith et al., 1990; Pierce and Good, 1992; (Boyer and Hossack, 1992), namely that some slide blocks may Good and Pierce, 1996), but rather to synthesize regional tec- have been emplaced catastrophically during large magnitude earth- tonic relations and present new information relative to the mag- quakes associated with large-volume silicic eruptions in the Heise matic and structural history of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • WYOMING CULTURAL PROPERTIES FORM (Rev
    WYOMING CULTURAL PROPERTIES FORM (rev. 3.0 8/29/18) Page number 1 Date ___________________________________________________________ Smithsonian # _______________________________ RECORD TYPE: _x__ First-recording, ___ Full Re-record, ___ Update, ___ Condition Report, ___ Site Lead PROPERTY CATEGORY: ___Prehistoric Site, ___Historic Site, _x__Building, ___Structure, ___Object, ___District, ___Landscape, ___Lithic Landscape, ___TCP 1. IDENTIFICATION/OWNERSHIP Consultant Project Number _________________________________ Agency Project Number(s) ___________________________________________ Associated Project Name_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Site Name _Ben Goe Cabin and Garage__________________________________________ Temporary Field Number ________________________ Other Common names: __U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Quarters No. 3_______________Agency Site Number ________________________________ Other Site Number _________________________________ Landowner (at time of this reporting, specify agency/district, if private give name and address): ___ check here if site information is confidential Fish and Wildlife Services National Elk Refuge P.O. Box 510 Jackson, WY 83001 2. LOCATION (repeat as needed on continuation sheets; ____ check here if additional locational information is on continuation sheet) Street address _Elk Refuge Road________________________________________ Town ____Jackson____________________________________ Lot-Block: _______N/A_____________________ Parcel
    [Show full text]
  • Er-4348 and Numerical Models for the Jackson Hole
    ER-4348 p r o c e d u r e s f o r t h e development o f c o n c e p t u a l AND NUMERICAL MODELS FOR THE JACKSON HOLE ALLUVIAL AQUIFER, TETON COUNTY, WYOMING USING ARC/INFO GIS AND MODFLOW by Carma San Juan ProQuest Number: 10781218 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10781218 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ER-4348 This engineering report is submitted to the faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering (Geological Engineer). Golden, Colorado Date:^ ^ ./* v /# y Signed: Approved: Dr. Kenneth Kolm Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date: Dr. Roger Slatt Department Head, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ARTHUR 1/.K2S USHKOT ii COLORADO SCHOOL OF GOLOEfi CO 80401 ER-4348 ABSTRACT Jackson Hole, a rapidly developing region of northwest Wyoming, is experiencing increased surface and ground-water related disputes. Currently, no basin-encompassing model to assess ground-water resources of the shallow ground-water system has been satisfactorily completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Teton & Yellowstone Region
    2010 Mountain Country GRAND TETON & YELLOWSTONE REGION Vacation Excursions Mountain Towns National Parks Regional Map FREE yellowstoneadventureguide.com ShootingThe West Since D.D. Camera Corral 1960 60 S. CACHE STREET JACKSON, WYOMING 307.733.3831 AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II POWER. PRECISION. PERFORMANCE. • Nikon VR II THE BLUEPRINT FOR VERSATILITY • Nikon Super Integrated Coating • Low Noise ISO Sensitivity from 200 to 12,800 • Nano Crystal Coat TOWN SQUARE • Nano Crystal Coat ­ • Continuous Shooting Up to 9 FPS North All Nikon products include BROADWAY • HD Video Capture Nikon Inc. USA limited warranty Eddie E Bauer H % Niikon Authorized Dealer C • Up to 4,300 images per battery charge A www.nikonusa.com C PEARL Photograph: Sue Rogers TM 307.733.4159 800.543.6328 are qu S H n wy w 22 o T n’s so ert S Alb outh H P w ark Loo p y 8 s ’ h 9 t i We’re a Jackson Hole m S H o MUST-SEE! Try free High School Rd b a c c samples in our factory k store on Highway 89 at 100% Natural Smith’s Plaza. MADE IN JACKSON HOLE 3TEAK .ATURAL0ACK www.jhbuffalomeat.com .ATURAL call 800.543.6328 for a free catalog "UFFALO%LK 2 MOUNTAIN COUNTRY ADVENTURE GUIDE 2009 .ATURAL "UFFALO &ILET 4RAPPER 3TYLE "UFFALO *ERKY “WESTERN REFLECTIONS” 34YEARS OF INSPIRATION AT 6000 FT. JEWELRY ORIGINALS Gaslight Alley • Downtown Jackson Hole • 125 N.Cache www.danshelley.com • [email protected] • 307.733.2259 ALLDESIGNSCOPYRIGHTED NATURE TOWNS Connts 5 Greater Yellowstone Ecosytem 36 Cody RECREATION 6 Geotourism 39 Alpine Junction 16 Biking 9 Wildlife 40 Teton Village
    [Show full text]
  • Spread Creek Pit Bridger Teton National Forest and Grand Teton National Park Biological Assessment
    Spread Creek Pit Bridger Teton National Forest and Grand Teton National Park Biological Assessment August 2016 National Park Service – U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Forest Service – U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Highway Administration – U.S. Department of Transportation Grand Teton National Park P.O. Drawer 170 Moose, WY 83012-0170 Bridger Teton National Forest 340 N. Cache P.O. Box 1888 Jackson, WY 83001 Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Highway Division 610 East Fifth Street Vancouver, WA 98661-3801 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Consultation History ........................................................................................................... 3 Proposed Action .................................................................................................................. 4 Background ...................................................................................................................... 4 Operation of Spread Creek Pit ......................................................................................... 6 Conservation Measures .................................................................................................. 11 Schedule ......................................................................................................................... 12 Description of the Action Area .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]