Biogeographical Patterns in Pyrenomycetous Fungi and Their Taxonomy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biogeographical Patterns in Pyrenomycetous Fungi and Their Taxonomy ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2010. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON doi: 10.5248/114.281 Volume 114, pp. 281–303 October–December 2010 Biogeographical patterns in pyrenomycetous fungi and their taxonomy. 1. The Grayan disjunction Larissa N. Vasilyeva1 & Steven L. Stephenson2 [email protected] 1Institute of Biology & Soil Science, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA Abstract — In this paper the biogeographical pattern known as the Grayan disjunction is discussed with respect to pyrenomycetous fungi. The importance of considering biogeographical data in taxonomy is emphasized. Apiognomonia duschekiae is described as a new species, Biscogniauxia alnophila is proposed as a new name for B. mediterranea var. microspora, and Nemania sphaeriostoma is proposed as a new combination. Key words — Ascomycota, biogeography, distribution Introduction The importance of pyrenomycetous fungi in ecosystems as decomposer organisms cannot be overestimated, but many issues relating to their taxonomy, ecological preferences, and geographical patterns remain unclear on a global scale. Many pyrenomycetous fungi are restricted to particular hosts, and this association suggests that each species follows the distribution of its substrates, at least within uniform climatic zones, such as the cold temperate, warm temperate, or tropical zones. Indeed, there are circumpolar, circum-boreal, and pan-tropical pyrenomycete species, which some might consider to represent the primary distribution patterns for these fungi. More limited and peculiar patterns have been not discussed or even suspected. As a result, although the Asian mycobiotas are not similar to the European mycobiota, mycologists often have applied European names to morphologically similar Asian fungi because they assume that fungi are widely distributed. 282 ... Vasilyeva & Stephenson This paper discusses one biogeographical pattern that is usually termed the Grayan (Petersen & Hughes 2007) or Graysian (Tulloss 2005) disjunction in mycological literature. A number of plants and animals restricted to eastern North America where remnants of the ancient Tertiary flora persist can also occur in similar fragments of that flora in eastern Asia. Such a distribution, known as the famous “Asa Gray disjunction,” has been reported for species of fungi, primarily macrofungi (Hongo & Yokoyama 1978, Zang 1986, Wu & Mueller 1997, Yang 2000, Mueller et al. 2001) or lichenized fungi (Culberson 1972, Dey 1976, Wei & Biazrov 1991). An examination of the biogeographical patterns of pyrenomycetous fungi, which have not been considered previously, reveals a number of examples of Grayan distribution. Materials and methods The specimens mentioned in this study were collected by the senior author over many years throughout eastern Russia and the eastern United States. The basic map was taken from the web site http://commons.wikimedia.org and modified with our data. Photographs of ascomata were obtained using a Nikon D40x digital camera. Non-vicariance pattern Among the pyrenomycetous fungi are two species groups that demonstrate a Grayan distribution—those that occur in eastern Asia and eastern North America and those that display a vicariance pattern. Examples of the first group are Fracchiaea callista (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc. (Fig. 1), “Diatrypella informis” Ellis & Everh. (Fig. 2), Graphostroma platystoma (Schwein.) Piroz. (Fig. 3), and possibly Nitschkia floridana Fitzp. (Vasilyeva et al. 2010). Graphostroma platystoma occurs on dead branches of many kinds of trees, suggesting a wide distribution, but the fungus displays an affinity for eastern Asia and eastern North America. Similarly Diatrype albopruinosa (Schwein.) Cooke is found only in these two widely separated areas (Fig. 4); it has a broad tree host range in eastern North America (Rappaz 1987) but occurs only on Padus avium Mill. in eastern Russia. This is not the only example of an apparent substrate preference displayed by pyrenomycetous or loculoascomycetous fungi in eastern Russia. As another example, Byssosphaeria rhodomphala (Berk.) Cooke, occurs in eastern Russia only on Maackia amurensis Rupr., Phellodendron amurense Rupr., and P. sachalinense (F. Schmidt) Sarg., whereas in North America this species is known mostly on Populus spp. and Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Barr 1990). Both Populus and Robinia are present in eastern Russia, yet they apparently never serve as hosts to Byssosphaeria rhodomphala. Maackia and Robinia are both members of the Fabaceae, unlike the more distantly related Phellodendron (Rutaceae) and Populus (Salicaceae). The preference of the same Pyrenomycetes: the Grayan disjunction ... 283 Fig. 1. Approximate biogeographical distribution of Fracchiaea callista. For North America, Nannfeldt (1975) cited the Alabama, Ontario, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina localities while the westernmost record thus far from Arkansas is supported by Vasilyeva’s collection in the Buffalo National River; Connecticut, Maryland and Virginia are omitted. Localities in eastern Russia and South Korea are also based on the first author’s own collections. Scale bar = 0.75 mm. species for different hosts in different regions remains inexplicable — unless they are not the same species. If further studies prove them to be different species, they would represent a vicariance pattern in the Grayan distribution, discussed below. A good example of Grayan disjunction is Hypoxylon sphaeriostomum, known earlier from the USA (Georgia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania; Miller 1961) 284 ... Vasilyeva & Stephenson Fig. 2. Approximate biogeographical distribution of “Diatrypella informis”. Only two localities are indicated for eastern Russia, although this species is rather common on dead branches of Carpinus cordata Blume and is also found throughout the Primorsky Territory, including the Sikhote-Ainsky Nature Reserve, Kedrovaya Pad Biosphere Reserve, Ussuriysky Nature Reserve, the Vladivostok vicinity, and near Anisimovka (District Shkotovo). The eastern North American locality is based on Ellis & Everhart’s North American Fungi No. 2530 (“Diatrypella informis E. & E. n. sp. (type), on dead Carpinus, London, Canada, Apr. 1890, J. Dearness”). Scale bar = 1 mm. and recorded later from eastern Russia (Fig. 5). This species, which Ju & Rogers (1996) excluded from Hypoxylon (considering it to belong to Euepixylon), is treated herein as Nemania sphaeriostoma. Some species that display an apparent Grayan distribution have been reduced to synonyms, although they are morphologically distinctive and have a restricted distribution. For instance, Ju et al. (1998) regarded Biscogniauxia pezizoides (Ellis & Everh.) Kuntze as synonymous with B. repanda (Fr.) Kuntze. Pyrenomycetes: the Grayan disjunction ... 285 Fig. 3. Approximate biogeographical distribution of Graphostroma platystoma. North American localities listed by Pirozynski (1974) include Ontario and Quebec in Canada and Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Vermont in the USA. The eastern Russian specimens were collected in the Primorsky and Khabarovsk territories, the Amur Region, and on Sakhalin and Kunashir islands. Scale bar = 0.7 mm. However these two names might just as easily represent different species that are restricted to different host plants (mostly Ulmus and Sorbus, respectively) and their occurrence on different continents has already been noted (Pouzar 1979). The later discovery ofB. pezizoides in eastern Asia (Vasilyeva 1998) fits its distribution in the Grayan disjunction (Fig. 6). Another example is Diaporthella platasca (Peck) Wehm. (Fig. 7), first described from the Adirondack Mountains in eastern United States (Peck 1873) and later been shown (Wehmeyer 1933) to have smaller stromata and larger ascospores (16–23 µm long) than the European species D. aristata (Fr.) Petr. (ascospores 13–16 µm long). However, the two species were later confused and referred to D. aristata (Barr 1978, Chlebicki 2002). When D. aristata and D. platasca were found in eastern 286 ... Vasilyeva & Stephenson Fig. 4. Approximate biogeographical distribution of Diatrype albopruinosa. Some USA localities (Connecticut, the Dakotas, New Jersey, Mississippi) are from Rappaz (1987), and those for Canada (Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan) are taken from MycoBank (www.mycobank.com). The distribution range of this species in North America extends more to the west than for many other species with a Grayan disjunction. Only two collections are known from eastern Russia (in the Primorsky Territory and the Amur Region), but the senior author also found D. albopruinosa in China (Heilongjiang Province). Scale bar = 1 mm. Asia—on the Kamchatka Peninsula and Sakhalin Island, respectively—their differences became evident, not only with respect to morphology but also in their ecological preferences. Diaporthella aristata parasitizes living branches of birch trees (Betula ermanii Cham.), whereas D. platasca occurs on dead branches of low shrubs (Betula middendorffii Trautv. & C.A. Mey.). While describing the genus Diaporthella, Petrak (1924) noted the parasitic nature of D. aristata. However, the particular kind of substrate (trees or shrubs, in this case) might be of no importance, since Chlebicki (2002) indicated that D. aristata (with typical ascospores 14–16 µm long) occurs on living and dead twigs of a very low shrub (Betula nana
Recommended publications
  • (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) Большехехцирского Заповедника С
    Амурский зоологический журнал, 2019, том XI, № 1 Amurian Zoological Journal, 2019, vol. XI, no. 1 www.azjournal.ru УДК 595.793 DOI: 10.33910/1999-4079-2019-11-1-72-77 http://www.zoobank.org/References/3BCBB470-E17E-4207-9DA4-F6529D369A52 ДОПОЛНЕНИЯ И ИСПРАВЛЕНИЯ К СПИСКУ ПИЛИЛЬЩИКОВ (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) БОЛЬШЕХЕХЦИРСКОГО ЗАПОВЕДНИКА С. В. Василенко Институт систематики и экологии животных Сибирского отделения РАН, ул. Фрунзе, д. 11, Новосибирск, 630091, Россия Сведения об авторе Аннотация. Приводится 16 видов пилильщиков. Среди них 13 видов ранее Василенко Сергей Владимирович не отмечались на территории Большехехцирского заповедника. Acantholyda E-mail: [email protected] parki Shinohara et Byun, 1996, Arge disparilis (Kirby, 1882), A. flavomixta (André, SPIN-код: 9176-8171 1881), A. nigrovaginata Malaise, 1931, Strongylogaster empriaeformis (Malaise, 1931), Macrophya sanguinolenta (Gmelin, 1790), M. vacillans Malaise, 1931, Rhogogaster chlorosoma (Benson, 1943) и R. sibirica Enslin, 1912 впервые обнаружены в Хабаровском крае. A. hasegawae Takeuchi, 1927 впервые найден в Хабаровском крае и на о-ве Кунашир. Обсуждаются некоторые проблемы, связанные с сибирскими и дальневосточными видами рода Rhogogaster Konow, 1884. Ключевые слова: пилильщики, новые находки, Большехехцирский заповедник, Дальний Восток. AMENDMENTS TO THE LIST OF SAWFLIES (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) OF THE BOLSHEKHEKHTSIRSKII RESERVE S. V. Vasilenko Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 11 Frunze Str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia Author Abstract. The paper lists 16 species of sawflies of which 13 species were Sergey V. Vasilenko discovered on the territory of the Bolshekhekhtsirskii reserve for the first E-mail: [email protected] time. Acantholyda parki Shinohara et Byun, 1996, Arge disparilis (Kirby, SPIN: 9176-8171 1882), A.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Plant Genera Eaten by Ungulates (Wi, Winter; Sp, Spring; Su, Summer; Au,Autumn)
    Appendix 1 Plant Genera Eaten by Ungulates (Wi, winter; Sp, spring; Su, summer; Au,autumn) Table 1. Plant genera eaten by Equus hemionus' Plant genera Locality" Badkhyz Nature Reserve! Barsakelmes Qapshaghay Game Island / Husbandry' (Seasons) Wi Sp Su Acanthophyllum +++ r ++ Acroptilon + Aegilops r ++ +++ Aeluropus r +++ Agropyron +++ Alhagi ++ ++ r ++ Allium +++ Amberboa +++ Anabasis +++ +++ Aphanopleura ++ Arabis + Aristida + Arnebia +++ +++ r Artemisia +++ +++ Astragalus +++ ++ + Atraphaxis r + + Atriplex ++ +++ Bongardia ++ Bromus +++ +++ +++ + ++ Bunium +++ Calamagrostis + Calligonum ++ ++ Caragana + ++ Cardaria ++ Carex +++ +++ +++ +++ Carthamnus ++ Centaurea ++ Ceratocarpus +++ Chorispora + Convolvulus +++ Cousinia +++ ++ r Crypsis ++ Delphinium +++ Table 1. Continued Plant genera Locality'' Badkhyz Nature Reserve' Barsakelmes Qapshaghay Game Island/ Husbandr y' (Seasons) Wi Sp Su Elymus + Ephedra ++ Eremopyrum +++ ++ +++ + Eremostachys r +++ Erodium ++ Euclidium + Eurotia +++ Ferula ++ ++ ++ Filipendula ++ Frankenia ++ Halocnemum +++ ++ Haloxylo n ++ +++ + Hordeum ++ +++ ++ Isatis +++ r Ixiolirion +++ Kochia + Lagonychium ++ Lepidium +++ Leptale um +++ Limonium +++ r + Lycium + Malcolmia ++ r ++ Medicago +++ Mentha +++ Nitraria ++ Onobrych is +++ Papaver ++ Phragmites + +++ Pistacia ++ Poa +++ +++ +++ +++ Psoralea ++ Ranunculus +++ Rheum + Roemeria ++ Rosa + Salsola +++ r + +++ Schismus ++ r Scorzonera +++ Secale ++ Sisy mbrium +++ Sorghum +++ Sphenopus r ++ Stipa ++ r + +++ Tamarix ++ r ++ + Tanacetum +++ ' Symbols indicate %
    [Show full text]
  • Mayfly Biodiversity (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Far East
    Евразиатский энтомол. журнал. Том 11. Прил. 2: 27–34 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2012 Mayfly biodiversity (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) of the Russian Far East Áèîðàçíîîáðàçèå ïîä¸íîê (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) ðîññèéñêîãî Äàëüíåãî Âîñòîêà T.M. Tiunova Ò.Ì. Òèóíîâà Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far East Branch, 100 let Vladivostoku ave. 159, Vladivostok 690022 Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. Биолого-почвенный институт ДВО РАН, просп. 100 лет Владивостоку 159, Владивосток 690022 Россия. Key words: Ephemeroptera, mayfly, fauna, Russian Far East. Ключевые слова: подёнки, фауна, Дальний Восток, Россия. Abstract. The mayfly fauna of the Russian Far East Наибольшее сходство видового состава подёнок currently includes 176 species from 39 genera and 18 fami- Дальнего Востока России с прилегающими территория- lies (i.e. 70 % of the total number of species known in ми отмечено для Японии и Кореи. Russia). The greatest diversity of mayflies is recorded from В биогеографическом отношении в фауне подёнок the southern part of the Russian Far East, including the доминируют палеархеарктические виды, составляющие basins of the Ussuri River, Amur, and the Sea of Japan. более 43 % фауны подёнок Дальнего Востока России. Species with Palaearchearctic ranges represent 43 % of the Наиболее обильны по числу видов с палеархеарктичес- mayfly fauna of the Russian Far East. Mayfly species com- ким и восточно-палеарктическим типами ареалов водо- position of the Russian Far East is similar to surrounding токи бассейнов рек Уссури, Амура и Японского моря. territories of Japan and Korea. Резюме. Фауна подёнок Дальнего Востока России Introduction представлена 176 видами из 39 родов и 18 семейств, что Biological diversity presents balance between for- составляет около 70 % фауны подёнок России и около mation and extinction of species over the course of the 4 % мировой фауны.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic and Biogeographical Study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: New Data on High Endemism of the Group
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 424:Systematic 19–57 (2014) and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East... 19 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group Yun Bu1, Mikhail B. Potapov2, Wen Ying Yin1 1 Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China 2 Moscow State Pedagogical University, Kibalchich str., 6, korp. 5, Moscow, 129278 Russia Corresponding author: Yun Bu ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Deharveng | Received 4 March 2014 | Accepted 4 June 2014 | Published 8 July 2014 http://zoobank.org/38EAC4B7-8834-4054-B9AC-9747AC476543 Citation: Bu Y, Potapov MB, Yin WY (2014) Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group. ZooKeys 424: 19–57. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388 Abstract Proturan collections from Magadan Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai, Primorsky Krai, and Sakhalin Oblast are re- ported here. Twenty-five species are found of which 13 species are new records for Russian Far East which enrich the knowledge of Protura known for this area. Three new species Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n., Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. and Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. are illustrated and described. The new materials of Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) are studied and described in details. Two new combi- nations, Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n. and Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia
    Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI 2018 Final Report Phoenix Fund 1 Securing a Future for Amur Leopards and Tigers in Russia – VI • 2018 Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Activities............................................................................................................................................ 4 SMART in five protected areas .................................................................................................................. 4 Annual workshop for educators ................................................................................................................ 8 Education in Khasan, Lazo, Terney and Vladivostok ................................................................................. 9 Tiger Day in Primorye .............................................................................................................................. 11 Art Contest .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Photo credits: PRNCO “Tiger “Centre”, Far Eastern Operational Customs Office, Land of the Leopard National Park, Alexander Ratnikov, and children's paintings
    [Show full text]
  • ALTA Conservation Update
    ALTA Conservation Update Amur Leopard and Tiger Alliance September 2007 Contributions by: • Tanya Arzhanova (Moscow Zoo) • Sergei Bereznuk (Phoenix Fund) • Martha Caron (Minnesota Zoo) • Sarah Christie (ZSL) • Michiel Hötte (ZSL / Tigris Foundation) • Anna Filippova, Masha Vorontsova and Maria Scherbacheva (IFAW) • Linda Kerley (Lazovsky Nature Reserve / WCS) • Sharon Miller (AMUR UK) and Katya Newman (AMUR Russia) • Dale Miquelle (WCS) ALTA contact person: Michiel Hötte, [email protected] New format for ALTA Conservation Updates The ALTA Conservation Update has a new format. From now on you will find our tiger, leopard and general news items in separate sections. Tigris Foundation will no longer distribute a separate Amur leopard newsletters. Instead, information about Amur leopards will be provided in the ALTA Conservation Updates. Topics: General 1. AMUR – Activities in late 2006 and early 2007 (Sharon Miller and Katya Newman) 2. Successful ALTA lobby in Moscow (Sharon Miller and Masha Vorontsova) Amur Tiger News 3. The International Tiger Coalition (ITC) and tiger trade in China (Sarah Christie) 4. Orphaned tiger cubs rescued (Anna Filippova and Masha Vorontsova) Amur Leopard News 5. Young female Amur leopard killed (Sergei Bereznuk) 6. Monitoring Far Eastern Leopards with Camera Traps (Dale Miquelle) 7. Medical and Genetic Assessments of wild Far Eastern Leopards (Dale Miquelle) 8. Amur leopard scat collection with dogs (Linda Kerley) 9. 2007 Winter Leopard Survey (Dale Miquelle) 10. Amur leopard reintroduction plan (Dale Miquelle) 11. North American Amur Leopard Population Management Plan (PMP) update (Martha Caron) 12. Amur Leopard EEP (European zoo breeding programme) update (Sarah Christie and Tanya Arzhanova) 1 Documents and information on Internet - Campaign against tiger trafficking (documents and films) available at www.tigrisfoundation.nl and www.endtigertrade.org - The Tiger Count 2005 final report is finally available.
    [Show full text]
  • Биота И Среда Заповедных Территорий Issn 2618-6764 Научный Рецензируемый Журнал 2019, № 2 Журнал Основан В 2013 Году, Издаётся С 2014 Года
    БИОТА И СРЕДА ЗАПОВЕДНЫХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ ISSN 2618-6764 НАУЧНЫЙ РЕЦЕНЗИРУЕМЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ 2019, № 2 Журнал основан в 2013 году, издаётся с 2014 года. В 2014–2017 годах именовался «Биота и среда заповедников Дальнего Востока» (Biodiversity and Environment of Far East Reserves), ISSN 2227-149X. Учредители: Дальневосточное отделение Российской академии наук и Дальневосточный морской заповедник — филиал Национального научного центра морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук. Редколлегия: главный редактор — Богатов Виктор Всеволодович, член-корр. РАН, д-р биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточное отделение РАН (ДВО РАН), Владивосток; зам. главного редактора — Дроздов Анатолий Леонидович, д-р биол. наук, проф., Национальный научный центр морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского ДВО РАН (ННЦМБ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; отв. секретарь редколлегии, и. о. зав редакцией — Тюрин Алексей Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, Дальне- восточный морской заповедник — филиал ННЦМБ ДВО РАН; Богачева Анна Вениаминовна, д-р биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Боркин Лев Яковлевич, канд. биол. наук, Зоологический институт РАН (ЗИН РАН), Санкт-Петербург; Глущенко Юрий Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточный федеральный университет (ДВФУ), филиал, Уссурийск; Дьякова Ольга Васильевна, д-р ист. наук, проф., Институт истории, археологии и этнографии народов Дальнего Востока ДВО РАН (ИИАЭ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Ильин Игорь Николаевич, д-р биол. наук, Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А. Н. Северцова РАН, Москва; Прозорова Лариса Аркадьевна, канд. биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пушкарь Владимир Степанович, д-р геогр. наук, проф., Дальневосточный геологический институт ДВО РАН (ДВГИ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пшеничников Борис Фёдорович, д-р биол.
    [Show full text]
  • Том 15. Вып. 2 Vol. 15. No. 2
    РОССИЙСКАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК Южный научный центр RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Southern Scientific Centre CAUCASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL BULLETIN Том 15. Вып. 2 Vol. 15. No. 2 Ростов-на-Дону 2019 Кавказский энтомологический бюллетень 15(2): 405–411 © Caucasian Entomological Bulletin 2019 Leafminer flies (Diptera: Agromyzidae: Agromyzinae) of the fauna of Russia and other countries of the Palaearctic Минирующие мухи (Diptera: Agromyzidae: Agromyzinae) фауны России и других стран Палеарктики © E.P. Nartshuk © Э.П. Нарчук Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb., 1. St Petersburg 199034 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Зоологический институт Российской академии наук, Университетская наб., 1, Санкт-Петербург199034 Россия Key words: Diptera, Agromyzinae, fauna, Russia, Palaearctic Region. Ключевые слова: двукрылые насекомые, минирующие мухи, фауна, Россия, Палеарктическая область. Abstract. A list of 38 species of the genera Agromyza are mining in leaves, stalks and seeds of different plants, Fallén, 1823 (9 species), Euhexomyza Lonsdale, 2014 a few produce galls or are mining in the young xylem of (1 species), Japanagromyza Sasakawa, 1958 (1 species), trees or roots. Host plants of most species are mono- Melanagromyza Hendel, 1920 (11 species) and and dicoledonous plants. A few species develop in ferns, Ophiomyia Braschnikov, 1897 (16 species) (Agromyzidae: horsetails or liverworts. Most species are more or less host Agromyzinae) occurring on the territory of Russia and some specific. Larvae of many species damage cultivated plants other countries together with localities and collection data and trees and a few are quarantine objects. The agromyzid is given. All the species are deposited in the collections of fauna of Russia and countries of the former USSR is the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences insufficiently studied.
    [Show full text]
  • New Occurrences of Corticioid and Poroid Fungi (Basidiomycota) in Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian Far East
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 54: 43–50 (2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/fce.2017.54.08 New occurrences of corticioid and poroid fungi (Basidiomycota) in Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian Far East Ilya A. Viner & Lyudmila Yu. Kokaeva Moscow State University, Faculty of Biology, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: New data on corticioid and poroid basidiomycetes from Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian Far East, is presented. Altogether there are 182 known species from the reserve; 76 are reported as new to the reserve and two as new to Russia. The material was collected in July of 2016 from 9 study plots located in forests of different types. Findings of some rarely collected species such as Botryobasidium botryoideum, Cerinomyces aff. aculeatus, Junghuhnia aurantilaeta, Phanerochaete robusta and Tyromyces wynneae are briefly discussed. The full-length ITS sequences ofJunghuhnia aurantilaeta, Phanerochaete robusta, Pyrrhoderma cf. sendaiense and Tyromyces wynneae were obtained and deposited in the GenBank. Junghuhnia aurantilaeta is proposed to be included in the new edition of the Red Data Book of Primorye Territory. The paper expands the knowledge of distribution of many species and increases the total number of species reported for the reserve. Keywords: biodiversity; corticioids; polypors; Russian Far East INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS The Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve is located on Fruit bodies were collected in Kedrovaya Pad the coastal spurs of the Manchurian Mountains. Nature Reserve, Primorye Territory, Russian The river valley of Kedrovaya river lies between Far East (Fig. 1), near Primorskaya station the Gakkelevsky and Sukhorechensky ridges (43°05’42”N, 131°35’6”E), Khasanskiy district (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and Corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017)
    Invertebrate Zoology, 2019, 16(3): 283–304 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2019 Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017) Yu.N. Sundukov1, K.V. Makarov2 1 Federal Scientific Center of East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 100-letiya Vladivostoka av. 159, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Zoology and Ecology Department, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Kibalchicha Street 6, Bld. 5, Moscow 129164 Russia.E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: An analyis of all available information on the ground beetles of the Russian Far East published in the 2nd edition of the first volume of the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera is presented. A total of 155 Far Eastern taxa of Carabidae is included, for which 178 changes are given: 108 of them concern distribution data, while 70 require taxonomic corrections. Another 8 omitted Far Eastern taxa are added to the catalogue; 31 and 19 taxa are included in or excluded from the fauna of the Far East, respectively; the distribution information is either restricted or expanded for 46 taxa. The total number of species-rank taxa in the fauna of the Far East is increased from 761 to 781. How to cite this article: Sundukov Yu.N., Makarov K.V. 2019. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Russian Far East: Additions and corrections to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 1 (2017) // Invert. Zool. Vol.16. No.3. P.283–304. doi: 10.15298/invertzool.16.3.07 KEY WORDS: Taxonomic list; omitted taxa; distribution; added taxa; excluded taxa; taxonomic refinements; regional biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report – Phoenix Fund
    2016 Annual Report – Phoenix Fund 1 2016 Annual Report – Phoenix Fund BACKGOUND Just a century ago, there were an estimated 100,000 tigers in the wild; today only about 3,500 survive and occupy 7% of their historic range. The tiger has traditionally been classified into nine subspecies, of which three are recently extinct and one likely so. Bengal, Amur, Sumatran, Indochinese, and Malayan tiger, are the surviving subspecies, while the Bali, Javan, Caspian, and, perhaps South China subspecies are extinct. A world without tigers would mean an ecological imbalance as they are the highest in the food chain and are predators. Nowadays, tiger is on the agenda at many highest level political meetings organized to discuss its conservation. At the end of one of such meetings, the International Tiger Forum held in St. Petersburg in 2010, leaders of 13 tiger range countries adopted a Global Tiger Recovery Program that includes a target of doubling wild tiger numbers by 2022, making core tiger areas inviolate, increasing public awareness of tiger conservation, setting up cross-boundary protected areas and cracking down on poaching and smuggling. Russia is one of the 13 tiger-range countries that signed a Declaration aimed at doubling tigers worldwide by 2022. Russian President Vladimir Putin is deeply concerned about Amur tiger conservation and has conducted many visits to Primorsky krai in the south of the Russian Far East, which is home to 95 per cent of the global population of Amur tigers. Unfortunately, this subspecies, in spite of a relative stabilization during previous decades, still face many threats such as poaching, habitat destruction, prey depletion and others.
    [Show full text]