Section 4. Section 4(F) Resources, Uses, and Measures to Minimize Harm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 4. Section 4(F) Resources, Uses, and Measures to Minimize Harm Section 4. Section 4(f) Resources, Uses, and Measures to Minimize Harm 4.1 Parks and Recreational Section 4(f) Resources The Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation process for parks, recreation areas, and wildlife or waterfowl refuges involves the following steps: 1. Identifying publicly owned lands in the project area of potential effect (APE) that may be protected by Section 4(f) as parks, recreation areas, or wildlife or waterfowl refuges. 2. Evaluating the applicability of Section 4(f) to those lands. 3. Determining whether any of the alternatives would result in a “use” of Section 4(f) resources. 4. Evaluating avoidance alternatives and minimization/mitigation measures for any resources where a Section 4(f) use would occur. (Avoidance alternatives were discussed in Section 3.) Section 4(f) park and recreational resources inside the Sellwood Bridge Project APE are depicted on Figure 1.6-1. The ensuing subsections provide the following information about each of these resources: • Description • Section 4(f) Use Determination • Build Alternatives that Avoid Section 4(f) Use • Measures to Minimize Harm The No Build Alternative would have no impact on Section 4(f) resources. 4.1.1 Springwater Corridor Trail Description The Springwater Corridor Trail is a shared-use trail on a former rail line in southeast Portland. The paved surface is generally 12 feet wide with soft shoulders. The trail accommodates walkers, joggers, hikers, bicyclists, those in wheelchairs, and strollers. Inside the vicinity of the Sellwood Bridge Project, the trail is adjacent to an active (but lightly used) rail line, goes under the Sellwood Bridge, and terminates at SE Umatilla Street, where a gap in the trail exists. The Springwater Corridor Trail is the major southeast segment of the Portland Metro area’s 40- Mile Loop trail system. The trail itself extends far beyond the boundaries of the Sellwood Bridge project area, connecting several parks and open spaces, including Tideman Johnson Natural Area, Beggars-Tick Wildlife Refuge, the I-205 Bike Path, Leach Botanical Garden, Powell Butte Nature Park, and Gresham’s Main City Park. Sellwood Bridge Project Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation 4(f)-41 Parks and Recreational Section 4(f) Resources Section 4. Section 4(f) Resources, Uses, and Measures to Minimize Harm Springwater Corridor Trail. Section 4(f) Use Determination All Build alternatives would result in a similar Section 4(f) use of this resource because of temporary occupation of the trail associated with construction. Under all Build alternatives, parts of the trail would close during rehabilitation of the main bridge and installation of the bicycle/pedestrian bridge structure that would go over the trail. The estimated duration for constructing the Build alternatives is 3 to 4 years. Sections of trail underneath the main bridge and the bicycle/pedestrian bridge would be closed for brief periods at sporadic times during the project when overhead construction was occurring. Although this impact would be temporary, it would constitute a Section 4(f) use because project actions (under all the Build alternatives) currently do not meet the Section 4(f) statute’s fifth temporary occupation exception criterion (23 CFR 774.13[d]): There must be documented agreement of the appropriate Federal, State, or local officials having jurisdiction over the resource regarding the above conditions [a reference to the first four Section 4(f) temporary occupation exception criteria]. To satisfy this fifth criterion, the project would need to have documented agreement from Portland Parks and Recreation (PP&R) and Metro, the two public agencies that co-administer the Springwater Corridor Trail. To this end, communication has been initiated between the Sellwood Bridge project team, PP&R, and Metro regarding the issue of whether Build alternative impacts to the Springwater Corridor Trail are minor enough to meet the Section 4(f) temporary occupation exception criteria. Thus far, although neither PP&R nor Metro has determined that Build alternative impacts meet the temporary occupation exception criteria, they are open to future dialogue on this matter pending further project design details. Therefore, absent the aforementioned documented agreement, it is concluded presently that a Section 4(f) use of the Springwater Corridor Trail would occur under all Build alternatives. If PP&R and Metro concur at a later time that Build alternative impacts are minor enough to meet the temporary occupation exception criteria, there would be no Section 4(f) use at the Springwater Corridor Trail as a result of any Build alternative actions. Build Alternatives that Avoid Section 4(f) Use None. All Build alternatives would result in a Section 4(f) use of this resource. 4(f)-42 Sellwood Bridge Project Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Parks and Recreational Section 4(f) Resources Section 4. Section 4(f) Resources, Uses, and Measures to Minimize Harm Measures to Minimize Harm Measures to minimize harm to the Springwater Corridor Trail under all Build alternatives would include, but would not be limited to, the following: • Installing overhead containment structures over the Springwater Corridor Trail in the vicinity of bridge construction • Preparing a detour plan in coordination with PP&R and Metro to address the manner in which Springwater Corridor Trail users would be rerouted during times of trail closure • Providing a temporary detour for the Springwater Corridor Trail, to include the following elements, as necessary: − Surfacing − Signage − Pavement markings 4.1.2 Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank) Description In 1988, the City of Portland adopted the Willamette Greenway Plan, whose stated goal was “to protect, conserve, maintain, and enhance the scenic, natural, historical, economic, and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River.” The Willamette Greenway Plan fulfilled the intentions of Oregon Planning Goal 15 (Willamette River Greenway). A primary objective of the Willamette Greenway Plan was “to create a continuous recreational trail extending the full length on both sides of the Willamette River but not necessarily adjacent to the river for the entire length.” As of 2007, a continuous Willamette Greenway Trail does not exist, but sections of the trail are in place, including sections located inside the project area. On the east side of the river inside the project area, a designated section of the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank) extends south from Sellwood Riverfront Park, passes under the Two views of the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank). Sellwood Bridge Project Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation 4(f)-43 Parks and Recreational Section 4(f) Resources Section 4. Section 4(f) Resources, Uses, and Measures to Minimize Harm Sellwood Bridge, and terminates at SE Umatilla Street. While the sections of the trail south of SE Spokane Street are on private property, they are still a public recreational resource. The City of Portland has a trail easement to this section of trail and manages this section of trail as part of the overall public trail system. The Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank)’s primary use is as a recreational trail for walking and biking. Aside from the paved trail itself, the only trail-related improvements are the disabled-access public restrooms located in Sellwood Riverfront Park. Section 4(f) Use Determination All Build alternatives would result in a similar Section 4(f) use of this resource because of temporary occupation of the trail associated with construction. Under all Build alternatives, parts of the trail would close during rehabilitation of the main bridge and installation of the bicycle/pedestrian bridge structure that would go over the trail. The estimated duration for constructing the Build alternatives is 3 to 4 years. Sections of trail underneath the main bridge and the bicycle/pedestrian bridge would be closed for brief periods at sporadic times during the project when overhead construction was occurring. Although this impact would be temporary, it would constitute a Section 4(f) use because project actions (under all the Build alternatives) currently do not meet the Section 4(f) statute’s fifth temporary occupation exception criterion (23 CFR 774.13[d]): There must be documented agreement of the appropriate Federal, State, or local officials having jurisdiction over the resource regarding the above conditions [a reference to the first four Section 4(f) temporary occupation exception criteria]. To satisfy this fifth criterion, the project would need to have documented agreement from Portland Parks and Recreation (PP&R), the agency that administers the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank). To this end, communication has been initiated between the Sellwood Bridge project team and PP&R regarding the issue of whether Build alternative impacts to the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank) are minor enough to meet the Section 4(f) temporary occupation exception criteria. Thus far, although PP&R has not determined that Build alternative impacts meet the temporary occupation exception criteria, it is open to future dialogue on this matter pending further project design details. Therefore, absent the aforementioned documented agreement, it is concluded presently that a Section 4(f) use of the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank) would occur under all Build alternatives. If PP&R concurs at a later time that Build alternative impacts are minor enough to meet the temporary occupation exception criteria, there would be no Section 4(f) use at the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank) as a result of any Build alternative actions. Build Alternatives that Avoid Section 4(f) Use None. All Build alternatives would result in a Section 4(f) use of this resource. Measures to Minimize Harm Measures to minimize harm to the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank) under all Build alternatives would include, but would not be limited to, the following: • Installing overhead containment structures over the Willamette Greenway Trail (East Bank) in the vicinity of bridge construction 4(f)-44 Sellwood Bridge Project Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Parks and Recreational Section 4(f) Resources Section 4.
Recommended publications
  • Sub-Area: Southeast
    PARKS 2020 VISION OUTHEAST Distinctive Features Studio in the Laurelhurst Park annex is a satellite of the Montavilla Community Center. I Aquatic facilities include Sellwood, Mt. Scott, Description: The Southeast sub-area (see map at the Buckman, Montavilla and Creston. end of this section) contains many of the city's older, I established neighborhoods. This area is a patchwork of The Community Music Center is in this sub-area. older, mainly single-family neighborhoods divided by I The Southeast sub-area has three Community linear commercial corridors. The Central Eastside Schools and 45 school sites. Industrial District, which borders the east bank of the I There are lighted baseball stadiums at Willamette, separates some residential neighborhoods Westmoreland and Lents Parks. from the river. Resources and Facilities: Southeast has 898 acres Population – Current and Future: The Southeast of parkland, ranking third in total amount of park sub-area ranks first in population with 154,000 and acreage. Most parks are developed, well distributed, is projected to grow to 157,830 by 2020, an increase in good condition, and can accommodate a range of of 2%. recreational uses. I Southeast has the City’s largest combined acreage DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE of neighborhood and community parks. I Southeast has a variety of habitat parks, including Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Tideman Johnson Park, and Johnson Creek Park that are popular sites for hiking, birding, walking, and general recreation use. I This sub-area includes part of the I-205 Bike Trail and about 4.6 miles of the Springwater Corridor, a 195-acre 16.5 mile-long regional trailway that includes many natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook: Portland, Oregon
    Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook: Portland, Oregon A Tool Designed to Foster Creativity and Innovation in Developing an Urban River’s Edge that Improves Conditions for Fish, Wildlife and People City of Portland, Oregon Bureau of Environmental Services Portland Development Commission GreenWorks, PC Landscape Architecture ClearWater West Fishman Environmental Services, LLC Inter-Fluve, Inc. May 2001 KPFF Consulting Engineers Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook: Portland, Oregon A Tool Designed to Foster Creativity and Innovation in Developing an Urban River’s Edge that Improves Conditions for Fish, Wildlife and People City of Portland, Oregon Bureau of Environmental Services Portland Development Commission GreenWorks PC, Landscape Architecture ClearWater West Fishman Environmental Services, LLC Inter-Fluve, Inc. May 2001 KPFF Consulting Engineers Acknowledgements CITY OF PORTLAND: Portland Development Commission: Michael McElwee Larry Brown Bureau of Environmental Services: Mary Abrams Mike Reed Chris Prescott Jim Middaugh Office of Planning and Development Review: Sallie Edmunds Barb Grover Eric Engstrom CONSULTING DESIGN TEAM: GreenWorks, P.C. Landscape Architecture and Environmental Design: Mike Abbaté David Elkin Liesl Lackaff Jeanette Pritchard Brian Wethington ClearWater West: Martha Mitchell Fishman Environmental Services, LLC: Paul Fishman Inter-Fluve, Inc.: Greg Koonce KPFF Consulting Engineers, Inc.: Andrew Jansky Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook May 2001 GreenWorks, PC • ClearWater West • Fishman Environmental Services • Inter-Fluve • KPFF Consulting Design Notebook Willamette River TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction to the Design Notebook 1 A. Vision 1 B. Audience and Purpose 1 1. User Groups 1 2. Intent of the Notebook 2 C. Background and Context for a Design Notebook 3 1. Overview of the Willamette River Watershed 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Reciprocal Admissions Program
    AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 2020 RECIPROCAL ADMISSIONS PROGRAM Participating Gardens, Arboreta, and Conservatories For details on benefits and 90-mile radius enforcement, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Program Guidelines: A current membership card from the American Horticultural Society (AHS) or a participating RAP garden entitles the visitor to special admissions privileges and/or discounts at many different types of gardens. The AHS provides the following guidelines to its members and the members of participating gardens for enjoying their RAP benefits: This printable document is a listing of all sites that participate in the American Horticultural Society’s Reciprocal Admissions Program. This listing does not include information about the benefit(s) that each site offers. For details on benefits and enforcement of the 90- mile radius exclusion, see https://ahsgardening.org/gardening-programs/rap Call the garden you would like to visit ahead of time. Some gardens have exclusions for special events, for visitors who live within 90 miles of the garden, etc. Each garden has its own unique admissions policy, RAP benefits, and hours of operations. Calling ahead ensures that you get the most up to date information. Present your current membership card to receive the RAP benefit(s) for that garden. Each card will only admit the individual(s) whose name is listed on the card. In the case of a family, couple, or household membership card that does not list names, the garden must extend the benefit(s) to at least two of the members. Beyond this, gardens will refer to their own policies regarding household/family memberships.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File Discussion Draft
    Volume I: Policies, Objectives and Recommendations CHAPTER III. POLICIES, OBJECTIVES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an overview of the River Plan / South Reach proposal by topic: o Watershed Health and Resilience. o Recreation. o Riverfront Communities. Each topical section includes the following: A brief introduction. Overview of the issues and opportunities. Comprehensive Plan policy guidance. Objectives to address the issues and opportunities consistent with the policy guidance. Proposed actions to implement the objectives. Actions may include proposed regulations, investments and/or programs that would be implemented by the City, other jurisdictions, the community, property owners or others. The full action plan can be found in Part 2 of this volume (see page 285 in Part 2). The issues and opportunities raised in the topic sections, Watershed Health and Resilience, Recreation and Riverfront Communities, are not mutually exclusive. Therefore, you may need to explore each section to understand the full range of recommendations related to a particular issue. River Plan / South Reach Discussion Draft 25 Volume I: Policies, Objectives and Recommendations B. WATERSHED HEALTH AND RESILIENCE 1. OVERVIEW The Lower Willamette River is a defining feature of the City of Portland. It travels through the heart of the city and is held as a symbol of the deep relationship between the people of Portland and their natural environment. The South Reach portion of the Lower Willamette River is truly unique within the city because of its natural beauty and expansive natural resources. A diverse mix of habitat types in the area support a variety of flora and fauna, including salmonid species listed under the federal ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenspaces Accomplishment Report
    metropolitan Greenspaces program Summary of Accomplishments 1991-2005 Metro U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Parks and Greenspaces Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 600 NE Grand Avenue 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Ste. 100 Portland, Oregon 97232 Portland, Oregon 97266 (503) 797-1850 (503) 231-6179 January 2005 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ...................................................................................................... 2 METROPOLITAN GREENSPACES PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 2 PUBLICATIONS, PRODUCTS and GREENSPACES PROJECTS ............................................ 4 CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION GRANT PROJECTS ............................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANT PROJECTS ........................................................ 32 SALMONID EDUCATION AND ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROJECTS ............................ 57 GREEN CITY DATA PROJECT ................................................................................................ 64 Authors: This report was written by Ron Klein, Mel Huie, Lynn Wilson, Deb Scrivens and Ilene Moss of Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces and Jennifer Thompson with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office. Contacts: Kemper McMaster, State Supervisor Jennifer Thompson, Greenspaces Program Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Ste. 100 Portland, Oregon 97266 (503) 231-6179 Jim Desmond, Director Metro Regional Parks & Greenspaces 600
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
    APPENDIX B4.2 – LAND USE BACKGROUND INFORMATION Existing Land Uses Existing land uses are shown on Figures B4.2‐1 to B4.2‐3, which include the ½‐mile study areas surrounding the potential stations as well as the ¼‐mile study areas on each side of the alignment alternatives. Segment A begins in the southern end of downtown Portland, the central city of the region, includes the South Waterfront District and extends south to the Hillsdale neighborhood. Existing land use here has been historically influenced and constrained by the presence of SW Barbur Boulevard (formerly a rail line) and the Willamette River, and more recently by the development of Interstates 5 and 205 (I‐5 and I‐205) as well as SW Naito Parkway. The northern portion of this segment is an extension of the central city (downtown) in its more densely developed blocks, and is similar in feel to other neighborhoods in the southern downtown area. The southern section of Segment A is dominated by auto‐oriented uses separated by parking lots and driveways. Properties on SW Barbur Boulevard are predominantly zoned for general commercial uses, and are developed with many auto‐oriented uses separated by parking lots and driveways. The zoning along SW Barbur Boulevard includes a mixture of commercial, open space and residential uses on the northern edge, transitioning to primarily multifamily and single‐family housing through the steep and wooded area, and then mostly low‐density commercial for the remainder of the corridor heading south to Tigard. Along SW Barbur Boulevard, existing land uses include auto‐oriented low‐ density commercial uses involving offices, personal services, and retail, followed by restaurants, apartments, auto‐specific uses (mechanics, tire and oil centers, body shops) and hotels.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]
  • Open House Summary Notes
    Summary Notes from the River Plan / South Reach Open House -12/1/18, at Lewellyn School Approximately 90 people attended the open house, which featured 5 display stations: 1) Project Overview and Urban Design Concept, 2) Recreation, Parks, Trails and Scenic Resources, 3) Natural Resources: Habitat, Vegetation and Floodplains, 4) Transportation; and 5) Land Use and Zoning. Each display station had a map(s), displayed information on what we’ve (project staff have) learned, draft plan concepts for zoning and other implementation actions, and a chart pack for people to share their comments. A couple of stations had Big Idea concept illustrations. They were the Natural Resources and Recreation display stations. Comment cards were also available for participants to provide their thoughts on the materials presented at the open house or anything else related to the South Reach. Below are the comments received from the open house event. The comments are organized by topics. Similar comments were provided at different stations and are reflected once with an acknowledgement when others recorded their additional support for a specific comment. Project Overview and Urban Design Concept • Ferry stop at Oaks Amusement Park • More viewpoints at Oaks Amusement Park – looking towards downtown • Extend no wake zone south to SE Spokane St – restrictions on wake board, ballast or wake enhancing activities (4 people support this comment) • Move Springwater Corridor observation deck further south by Oaks Amusement Park • Bird safe and lighting standards incentive program • Trolley/bicycle study – is there enough room for both on the west side? • Lighting as a consideration on the Springwater Corridor Trail • No breach of levee between Ross Island and Hardtack Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette River, Upriver Reach RM16-26 Orphan Declaration Memo.Pdf
    State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Memorandum Date: August 23, 2019 To: Lydia Emer, Administrator, Land Quality Division From: Madi Novak, Northwest Region Cleanup Program Through: Kevin Parrett, NW Region Cleanup Program Manager Paul Seidel, NW Region Cleanup Program Manager Mike ZoIIistch, Acting HQ Cleanup & Emergency Response Program Manager Subject: Request for Orphan Site Designation - Willamette River, Upriver Reach, RM16-26,ECSI#6220 The purpose of this memorandum is to request official designation of portions of the Willamette River sediment between approximately River Mile (RM) 16 and RM 26, known as the Upriver Reach, as an Orphan Site under Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 465.381. This designation will enable DEQ to use the Oiphan Site Account to fund site investigation activities in this area. ORS 465.381(6)(a) allows DEQ to use the Orphan Site Account for DEQ expenses at sites where the responsible party is "unknown or is unwilling or unable to undertake all required removal or remedial action." As described in this memorandum, DEQ has determined that the party or parties liable for contamination in this area are currently unknown. As explained further below, two areas in the Upriver Reach are identified as high priority areas for characterization. DEQ has determined that timely investigation of these areas is a priority because the areas have the highest concentrations of contaminants known in the Upriver Reach, there is potential that even higher concentrations exist nearby, and there is potential for significant exposure and risk to human health. Background The Upriver Reach is the most upstream portion of the Lower Willamette River, starting near the Sellwood Bridge at RM 16 and extending to the Willamette Falls at approximately RM 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Park Assessment and Recommendations
    Portland State University PDXScholar Master of Urban and Regional Planning Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Workshop Projects Planning 1-1-2010 Willamette Park Assessment and Recommendations Julia Babcock Portland State University Bernadette Le Portland State University Maren Murphy Portland State University Amy Rossa Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_murp Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Babcock, Julia; Le, Bernadette; Murphy, Maren; and Rossa, Amy, "Willamette Park Assessment and Recommendations" (2010). Master of Urban and Regional Planning Workshop Projects. 18. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_murp/18 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Urban and Regional Planning Workshop Projects by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. ARKWILLAMETTE P ASSESSMENT & TIONSARECOMMEND CTEJOPRA OFCUSUEROFQQ CTEJOPRLANNINGPP CUSUER ROUPGG LANNING ROUP: INALFFEPORTRR INAL EPORT ULIAJJOCKABCBB ULIAERNADETTEBB OCKABC, B LL ERNADETTEEEARENMM, M URPHYMM AREN &A&A&A URPHY&MY AAOSSRR MY AOSS 9,UNEJJ 2010 UNE 9, 2010 LIENTCCTLANDOR:P: LIENT P SARKPP TLANDORTIONACREE&R SARK& R TIONACREE WILLAMETTE PARK ASSESSMENT & RECOMMENDATIONS Willamette Park Assessment & Recommendations is a project developed by Quercus Planning Group, a team of Portland State UiUnivers ity MtMaster of UbUrban & RiRegional Plann ing Stu den ts. Quercus Planning Group worked as a consultant to Portland Parks & Recreation, and partnering agency Bureau of Environmental Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Section 4(F) Evaluation
    Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Contents Section Page 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................4(f)-1 1.1 What is Section 4(f)? ............................................................................................................... 4(f)-1 1.1.1 Test of Prudence and Feasibility........................................................................... 4(f)-2 1.2 Why are We Considering the Sellwood Bridge Project?............................................... 4(f)-2 1.3 Where is the Project Located? ............................................................................................. 4(f)-2 1.4 What is the Purpose of the Project? ................................................................................... 4(f)-3 1.5 Why is the Project Needed? ................................................................................................. 4(f)-3 1.5.1 Inadequate Structural Integrity ............................................................................. 4(f)-4 1.5.2 Substandard and Unsafe Roadway Design.......................................................... 4(f)-6 1.5.3 Substandard Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities across the River .................... 4(f)-6 1.5.4 Travel Demands Exceed Available Capacity...................................................... 4(f)-7 1.6 Section 4(f) Resources in the Area of Potential Effect.................................................... 4(f)-7 2. Proposed Actions ........................................................................................................4(f)-9
    [Show full text]
  • 5035 SE Mcloughlin Blvd PORTLAND, OR
    5035 SE McLoughlin Blvd PORTLAND, OR FOR SALE OR LEASE JORDAN CARTER CLAY NEWTON TYLER LINN 503.221.2280 503.721.2719 503.721.2702 Owner-User Opportunity [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable. It is provided without any representation, warranty, or guarantee, expressed or implied as to its accuracy. Prospective Buyer or Tenant should conduct an independent investigation and verification of all matters deemed to be material, including, but not limited to, statements of income and expenses. Consult your KIDDER.COM attorney, accountant, or other professional advisor. FOR SALE OR LEASE 5035 SE McLoughlin Blvd PORTLAND, OR Unique owner- user opportunity in NEW 2-SIDED ELECTRONIC close-in SE Portland HIGHLY VISIBLE LOCATION EXTENSIVELY REMODELED MESSAGING SIGN (58 SQ. FLEXIBLE CM2 WITH DAILY TRAFFIC IN 2016 FT. EACH SIDE) AT COST OF COMMERCIAL ZONING COUNT OF +53,000 $60,000 SALE PRICE: $2,500,000 LEASE RATE: $20/SF + NNN 6,258 SF BUILDING WITH LOCATED ¼ MILE FROM CAN BE DELIVERED WITH ±18 PARKING SPACES SE 17TH AVE & HOLGATE THE CURRENT TENANT OR BIKING SCORE OF 88 BLVD MAX STATION DELIVERED VACANT 360° VIEW 473,029 38.7 $114,481 $577,391 POPULATION WITHIN AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD MEDIAN AGE MEDIAN HOME VALUE 5-MILE RADIUS INCOME JORDAN CARTER CLAY NEWTON TYLER LINN 503.221.2280 503.721.2719 503.721.2702 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] KIDDER.COM This information supplied herein is from sources we deem reliable.
    [Show full text]