DOCSLIB.ORG

8458 the LONDON GAZETTE, 21 NOVEMBER, 1924. Character to That of the Corporation by Means 13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8458 the LONDON GAZETTE, 21 NOVEMBER, 1924. Character to That of the Corporation by Means 13 8458 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 21 NOVEMBER, 1924. character to that of the Corporation by means 13. The Bill will or may confer rights and of cash, shares, stock or debentures, or by any privileges upon the Corporation in addition and one or more of them. incidental to those hereinbefore referred to. 6. To provide if thought necessary or And Notice is hereby also given that on or desirable that the Corporation shall not issue before the 17th day of December next printed Debentures for any other purpose than that of copies of the Bill will be deposited in the Pri- purchasing or acquiring undertakings or vate Bill Office of the House of Commons and businesses of the character aforesaid, to limit on and after the 21st day of December next a or regulate the amount and value, of Deben- copy of the Bill may be inspected and copies tures so to be created and issued for any may also be obtained at the offices of the Cor- particular purpose, and to make regulations poration at the Boyal Exchange in the City of prescribing and limiting the amount or number London at the price of two shillings and six- of Debentures or the proportion of each issue pence per copy, and also at the offices of tho of the same to be set apart for and paid by the undersigned Parliamentary Agents1 in 39, Vic- Corporation in respect of every such under- toria Street, Westminster. taking or business so purchased or acquired by A notice stating the objects of the Bill has them as aforesaid. been or will be published in full in the 7. To empower the Corporation if they think " Times " of the 17th and 24th November, fit to redeem at any time or at such times as 1924. may be prescribed in the Bill such portion of the Debentures or any of them, as are redeem- Dated this 15th day of November, 1924. able, or to convert them into irredeemable BlSCHOFF, COXE, BlSCHOFF AND THOMP- stock. SON, 4, Great Winchester Street, 8. To empower the Corporation or the Court London, E.G., Solicitors for the Bill. of Directors on their behalf to divide all or any of their unissued capital into shares of such WYATT AND Co., 39, Victoria Street, denomination as they shall think fit and to (089) Westminster, Parliamentary Agents. convert the same into fully paid stock, to attach to the said shares such preference or preferred or deferred rights as to dividend or priority of capital as shall be determined by In Parliament.—Session 1925. them and to authorise the Corporation or Court of Directors as the ease may be if they think OLDHAM GOEPOEATION. fit to redeem any sucih shares or stock with or without a premium and on saich other terms TVTOTICE is hereby given that application is and conditions as shall be deemed necessary or •^ intended to be made to Parliament in the advisable. ensuing Session by the Mayor, Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Oldham 9. To alter and amend Fundamental Law (hereinafter referred to as " the Corporation '' 3 (c) of the Corporation so as to extend their and " the Borough " respectively) for an Act powers of acquiring holding and disposing of for all or some of the following purposes (that lands abroad which powers are now limited and is to say): — confined to " business premises " so as to 1. To alter and adjust the boundary between enable the Corporation to retain lands abroad the St. Paul's and Hollinwood Wards of the coming into their possession either by purchase Borough. or by way of reversion mortgage or otherwise for the general purposes of the Corporation and 2. To empower the Corporation to make and free of all restriction as to the purpose for which maintain within the Borough widenings and it is to be retained or oitherwise held or disposed improvements on both sides of Oheapside, of by the Corporation. Henshaw Street, Manchester Street, George Street, Vineyard Street, Lees Eoad, Ashton 10. To enable the Corporation to form sub- Road, Hollins Eoad and Manchester Eoad, on sidiary companies within and without the the north side of West Street, Market Place United Kingdom and to enable them to control and Bow Street, on the south side of Yorkshire manage or enjoy the benefit of the business Street, on the west side of King Street, on the carried on by such subsidiary companies and south-west side of Frederick Street, Drury to hold manage control and enjoy the same Lane and Chadderton Eoad and on the north- either solely or jointly with any other body west side of Featherstall Eoad North together person association or company as the case with all necessary and proper works and con- may be. veniences incidental thereto. 11. To authorise the Corporation to provide 3. To authorise the acquisition by compul- an official seal or seals for use in any country sion or agreement of lands and easements for territory district or place outside the United the purposes of the said improvements, of Kingdom and to empower them to appoint any lands between degg Street and Mill Street for person or official to affix the same to any docu- Town Hall extension purposes, and of lands in ment or instrument to which the Corporation the Urban District of Ohadderton for an exten- is a party in any such country district or place sion of Ghadderton Cemetery and to confer and generally to incorporate with and extend further powers upon the Corporation with to the Bill the provisions of Section 79 of the reference to the acquisition, retention and dis- Companies (Consolidation) Act, 1908. posal of lands. 12. To repeal alter and amend the Eoyal 4. To consolidate with amendments and Exchange Assurance Act, 1901 and any other additions the provisions of the existing Acts Act or Acts which may be inconsistent with the and Orders of the Corporation with reference purposes and provisions of the intended Bill. to their tramways undertaking, and to.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The London Gazette, November 20, 1908
    8'.58« THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 20, 1908. In Parliament.—Session 1909. • pipes situate wholly .in the said parish-of OLDHAM CORPORATION. Butterworth, commencing at .or in the winding, shaft of the said Butterworth Hall Colliery and (New Waterworks, Wells, Boreholes, Pumping terminating at or in the Butterworth Ha.ll. Stations ! and Aqueducts; New Road and Pumping Station. Footpath; Discharge of Water into Streams; Work No. 4.—An aqueduct, conduit or line Power to Collect and Impound Water; of pipes, situate wholly in the said parish of Maintenance of Waterworks; Breaking up Butterworth, commencing at or in the Butter-, Streets and Roads and Application of Water worth Hall Pumping Station and terminating Provisions of the Public Health Acts; Con- at or in the south-west corner of the existing firmation of Agreement with Platt Brothers Piethorne reservoir of the Corporation and .and Company Limited; Agreements with numbered 432 on the T»Vs Ordnance Map of Owners, &c., of Lands as to Drainage and the said parish of Butterworth, published in Protection of Waters and Waterworks from 1894. Pollution, &c.; Bye-laws for Preventing Work No. 5.—A well, borehole and pumping Pollution of Water; New Works to be part station (hereinafter referred to as "the Delph. of Water Undertaking of Corporation; New Pumping Station "), situate wholly in the parish Tramways and Incidental Works; Gauge ; and urban district of Saddleworth, in the West Motive Power; New Tramways to be part of Riding of the county of York, in the enclosures Tramways Undertaking of Corporation; Work- numbered 1621 and 1622 on the ysW Ordnance ing Agreements and Traffic Arrangements; Map of the said parish, and urban district .of Omnibuses and Motor Cars on the Trolley Saddleworth, published in 1906.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Cates, MD, DPH, Annual Re~Bort, Medical O~Cer Of
    1913. PUBLIC HEALTH. 17 already complaining of the large amount of "THE EVOLUlqON OF EPIDEMICS "* work and the large number of committees BvJ. T. C. NASH, M.D. (Edin.), D.P.H. (Camb.). (President of the Etstern Branch of the Society of which they are expected to attend. Medical Officers of Health.) The advocates for placing all sanitary Being a brief epitome or pr6cis of Chadwick Trust matters under the county councils would Lectures I., II. and III., on the Evolution of Epidemics. have us believe that the members of these councils have a much higher sense of duty than T HE evolution of disease implies and involves the members of rural district councils, but this the evolution of ideas of disease as well as certainly cannot apply to all county councils, of causes--the resultants being the labelled as, notwithstanding the permission given in the phenomena. Hence the importance of careful Local Government Act of i888 to appoint observation of phenomena objective and sub- medical officers of health, a cert~dn proportion jective, and of subsequent philosophic reasoning of county councils did not avail themselves of eoncerningsuch phenomena before pronouncing this privilege, and, indeed, only grudgingly a judgment. The history of disease should be appointed such officers when compelled to by traced back to broaden the outlook and the Housing and Town Planning Act of 19o 9. engender liberality of sentiment. Neither Chadwick nor Pasteur were medical DEFORmTIES.--\Vhen not due to tuberculosis men, but both played great pioneer parts in serious deformities are generally the result of preventive medicine, both making and recording infantile paralysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Oldham Radicalism and the Origins of Popular Liberalism, 1830-52 Author(S): Michael Winstanley Source: the Historical Journal, Vol
    Oldham Radicalism and the Origins of Popular Liberalism, 1830-52 Author(s): Michael Winstanley Source: The Historical Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Sep., 1993), pp. 619-643 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2639781 Accessed: 22/12/2008 08:12 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cup. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Historical Journal. http://www.jstor.org The Historicaljournal, 36, 3 (I 993), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Local Authority Arrangements, Areas and Names in England
    Changes to local authority arrangements, areas and names in England Orders and changes made by the Government and Councils between 1 April 2010 and 30 September 2011 Changes to local authority arrangements, areas and names in England Orders and changes made by the Government and Councils between 1 April 2010 and 30 September 2011 April 2012 Department for Communities and Local Government © Crown copyright, 2012 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. This document/publication is also available on our website at www.communities.gov.uk Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: Department for Communities and Local Government Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 030 3444 0000 April, 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4098-3456-4 Department for Communities and Local Government CONTENTS Part A Changes effected by order of the Secretary of State under the Local 4 Government Act 1972 1. Order conferring borough status under Section 245 of the Local Government Act 1972 4 Part B Changes effected by local authorities’ action or Order as notified to the 5 Secretary of State 1. Orders made under section 96 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 abolition of parishes 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Oldham Council Liberal Democrat Group Council Size Submission for the Electoral Review of Oldham Metropolitan Borough in 2020
    Oldham Council Liberal Democrat Group Council size submission for the electoral review of Oldham Metropolitan Borough in 2020 1. The need for change 2. Reductions in workload 3. The impact of modern methods 4. Benefits of a reduction in councillors 5. Impact on the electoral cycle 6. Impact on council services Page 1 of 4 1. The need for change Oldham Borough has had 60 councillors since it was created in its present form in 1985. That was doubtless a fair assessment of effort required then. But that was a long time ago. In every job function of the council but this, numbers have been drastically reduced by automation, slimmed-down administration, centralisation, and budget cuts. The public and our workforce note with resentment that the councillors have refused to ‘share the pain’ of cuts. The Liberal Democrat group has been advocating a reduction to 40 councillors (42 if our ward resizing proposal is accepted) for a number of years, but it has been rejected, partly on the grounds that it would need to involve the Electoral Commission. With the Electoral Commission reassessing Oldham at present, we believe it could and should happen now. 2. Reductions in workload The council has fewer functions and its budget has roughly halved in recent years. Its erstwhile biggest responsibility – schools and colleges – is mainly funded and controlled by central government. Housing is now under independent housing associations. Policing, transport, Fire and Rescue and strategic planning are sub-regional functions. There are roles on boards, but little involvement of rank and file councillors beyond governorships of individual schools.
    [Show full text]
  • CPRE – Devolution Discussion Paper (2016)
    DEVOLUTION: A DISCUSSION PAPER FOR CPRE BY LILLIAN BURNS JUNE 2016 1 Where is the government’s devolution of powers agenda heading? CPRE report, June 2016 FOREWORD With the exception of Brexit, the UK government’s devolution agenda for England - which officials describe as “fundamentally changing the way England is run” - is the most significant political process influencing CPRE’s work as we think about our Strategic Plan for 2017-2020. In light of this, we were delighted when Lillian Burns, Vice Chair of CPRE North West, offered to produce an impact assessment of the impact of devolution on CPRE’s work. I am sure you will agree that Lillian has produced a thought-provoking and timely “think piece” on some of the challenges ahead. In principle, CPRE supports empowering local communities – our 2026 Vision aspires to a future where “most decisions on land use are taken locally”. However, as Lillian outlines, there are a range of concerns about how devolution is currently being carried out, particularly in relation to transparency, accountability, and stakeholder engagement. The high degree of complexity involved, and the fact that each devolution deal is unique, presents further challenges for civil society. The devolution agenda has simply not been subjected to the degree of scrutiny that its importance warrants. As Lillian outlines, policy areas that can be devolved from central and local government to Combined Authorities include transport, strategic planning and housing. Given the centrality of these issues to CPRE’s work, we need to understand the devolution process and assess its impact. In the meantime, there is the increasing influence of Local Enterprise Partnerships to consider, not least their ability to make funding decisions based solely on economic growth, and their overall lack of accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis.Pdf
    Civic and municipal leadership: a study of three northern towns between 1832 and 1867 Michael Joseph Brennan Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds, School of History March 2013 ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been submitted on the understanding that it is the copyright material and that no quotation from this thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2013 The University of Leeds Michael Joseph Brennan iii Acknowledgements This thesis has its origin in an MA in Local Regional History undertaken at the University of Leeds in 1988, but it would never have reached this state without the guidance, support and knowledge of my supervisor, Professor Malcolm Chase of the University of Leeds. I owe him a great debt for helping me to turn my hazy ideas into a coherent piece of work, and reminding me how to study History again, after years spent in education. My thanks are also due to the staff of the School of History and of the University Library for their help and guidance. I have visited the following archive centres: West Yorkshire Archive Services at Halifax and Wakefield, Local Studies Centres at Oldham and Rochdale and The National Archive at Kew. Wherever I have gone, I have been helped with kindness, humour and outstanding professionalism for which I am extremely grateful. I am delighted that my friend and colleague Alastair Linden was able to help with ideas and proof reading.
    [Show full text]
  • 3B2 to Ps Tmp 1..43
    1984L0169 — EN — 22.01.1991 — 001.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 28 February 1984 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/ 268/EEC (United Kingdom) (84/169/EEC) (OJ L 82, 26.3.1984, p. 67) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Decision 91/25/EEC of 18 December 1990 L 16 25 22.1.1991 Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 112, 4.5.1991, p. 79 (91/25/EEC) 1984L0169 — EN — 22.01.1991 — 001.001 — 2 ▼B COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 28 February 1984 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (United Kingdom) (84/169/EEC) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Directive 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas (1), as last amended by Directive 82/786/EEC (2), and in particular Article 2 (2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (3), Whereas Directive 75/276/EEC (4) indicates which areas in the United Kingdom are included in the Community list of less-favoured areas within the meaning of Article 3 (4) of Directive 75/268/EEC; Whereas, pursuant to Article 2 (1) of Directive 75/268/EEC, the Government of the United Kingdom has requested an extension, via a redefinition,
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Representations Received on the Oldham Metropolitan
    Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Public Schedule of Representations and Responses Report for the Pre-Submission Public Participation Draft Statement of Community Involvement September 2006 Schedule of comments received on the Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council Pre-Submission Draft Statement of Community Involvement (Regulation 26 version) and the Council’s responses. Where a Representor has made more than one comment on the Draft Statement of Community Involvement these have been recorded separately. The following abbreviations are used in this document: LDF – Local Development Framework LDS – Local Development Scheme LDD – Local Development Document DPD – Development Plan Document SPD – Supplementary Planning Document SCI – Statement of Community Involvement RSS – Regional Spatial Strategy PPS12 – Planning Policy Statement 12 “Local Development Frameworks” EqIA – Equalities Impact Assessment 1 Countryside Agency Nature of Summary of representation Council’s response representation Other The SCI is unlikely to affect any of the Agency’s Noted. Landscape, Access or Recreation interests and therefore we have no specific comments to make. However, we do, of course, support and encourage effective community involvement within the planning system, including the preparation of the LDF. It is one of the Agency’s key principles that community involvement is considered essential to the achievement of our landscape, access and recreation interests in the new planning system. Local planning authorities are therefore encouraged to look at how they can successfully engage communities on these issues, and reflect this in the SCI. The Agency strongly supports community- planning initiatives, which we consider an essential part of good planning. We therefore support, for example, Village Design Statements and Concept Statements and are interested in incorporating these where possible in the new planning system.
    [Show full text]
  • Failsworth 1 Failsworth
    Failsworth 1 Failsworth Coordinates: 53.5102°N 2.1575°W [1] Failsworth Failsworth Pole Failsworth shown within Greater Manchester Population 20,555 (2001 Census) [2] OS grid reference SD895015 - London 163 mi (262 km) SSE Metropolitan borough Oldham Metropolitan county Greater Manchester Region North West Country England Sovereign state United Kingdom Post town MANCHESTER Postcode district M35 Dialling code 0161 Police Greater Manchester Fire Greater Manchester Ambulance North West EU Parliament North West England UK Parliament Ashton-under-Lyne List of places UK England Greater Manchester Failsworth is a town within the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham, in Greater Manchester, England. It lies on undulating ground, on the course of the Rochdale Canal and north bank of the River Medlock. It is 2.7 miles (4.3 km) west-northwest of Ashton-under-Lyne, 2.9 miles (4.7 km) south-southwest of Oldham and 4.2 miles (6.8 km) to the east-northeast of Manchester city centre. Failsworth lies within the orbital M60 motorway, which Failsworth 2 skirts Failsworth's eastern boundary. Failsworth had a total population of 20,555 in 2001. Historically a part of Lancashire, until the 19th century Failsworth was a small agricultural township linked, ecclesiastically, with the parish of Manchester. Farming was the main industry of this rural area, with locals supplementing their incomes by hand-loom weaving in the domestic system. The introduction of textile manufacture during the Industrial Revolution facilitated a process of unplanned urbanisation in the area, giving rise to Failsworth as a mill town, marked architecturally by several large redbrick cotton mills.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Act 1981
    Greater Manchester Act 1981 CHAPTER ix LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE Greater Manchester Act 1981 CHAPTER ix ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Citation and .commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Appointed day. PART II EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES 4. Advances for land acquisition or building work. 5. Loans for management of land. 6. Grants for industrial purposes. 7. Further power to assist industry. 8. Guarantee of rents, etc., of industrial buildings. 9. Duration of Part TI. c. ix Greater Manchester Act 1981 PART III LANDS, OPEN SPACES AND MUNICIPAL PROPERTY Section 10. Disposal of lost and uncollected property. 11. Byelaws as to leisure centres. 12. Closure of parks. 13. Provision of parking places in parks, etc. 14. Provision of vehicles in parks, etc. 15. Contribution towards provision of recreational facilities. 16. As to certain parks and recreation grounds. PART IV HIGHWAYS 17. Highway amenities. 18. Regulation of placing things on footway. 19. Power to provide kiosks, etc. 20. Buildings under highways. 21. Recovery of street works charges where owner unknown. 22. Street numbers. 23. Interference with property of local authorities, etc. 24. Provision of trees and shrubs. 25. hnprovement lines. 26. Prohibition of parking of goods vehicles in residential streets. 27. Control of verges. 28. Temporary stoppage of footpaths and bridleways. 29. Vesting of former highway land. PART V PUBLIC HEALTH 30. Hairdressers and barbers. 31. Registration of hawkers of food and their premises. 32. Acupuncturists, tattooists, ear-piercers, electrolysists, etc. 33. Definition of" inhabitant" in Act of 1936. 34. Dust, etc., from building operations. 35. Carrying or storage of waste food.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Archives of the Police Forces of England and Wales
    A Guide to the Archives of the Police Forces of England and Wales Ian Bridgeman Clive Emsley FORWARD BY THE PATRON OF THE POLICE HISTORY SOCIETY, LORD KNIGHTS, CBE, QPM, DL Clive Emsley and Ian Bridgeman have performed a great service in bringing out this comprehensive guide to the police archives of England and Wales, and revealing the wide range that these cover. Given the ravages of time, police mergers, weeders and weevils, coverage is necessarily uneven so that, for example, nothing survives in the Gloucester police archives which dates from before 1929 whereas Cambridge has records going back to 1822. The Cambridgeshire Constabulary is also exceptional in the number of documents which it has retained from the 1830's and 1840's, since police records do not generally pre-date the compulsory establishment of the new police following the 1856 Police Act. Many of the surviving records have already been deposited in local record offices, but what this guide reveals for the first time is the very wide range of the material which remains in police archives - some of it in a very poor state of preservation and much of it unindexed. In particular, most forces - for obvious internal, bureaucratic reasons - seem to have retained their personnel registers which, since they often run consecutively for a hundred or more years, provide an invaluable source for research into family, medical or migration history. Unfortunately, police stations do not always make ideal quarters for such valuable but fragile records. Space is often at a premium, as of course is the financial support necessary for proper conservation.
    [Show full text]