DOCSLIB.ORG

1/2015 Security and Human Rights in Chechnya and the Situation Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1/2015 Security and Human Rights in Chechnya and the Situation Of 1/2015 ENG Security and human rights in Chechnya and the situation of Chechens in the Russian Federation – residence registration, racism and false accusations Report from the Danish Immigration Service’s fact finding mission to Moscow, Grozny and Volgograd, the Russian Federation From 23 April to 13 May 2014 and Paris, France 3 June 2014 Copenhagen, January 2015 Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 2100 Copenhagen Ø Phone: 00 45 35 36 66 00 Web: www.newtodenmark.dk E-mail: [email protected] 1/2015 ENG Overview of Danish fact finding reports published in 2013 and 2014 Update on security and human rights issues in South‐ and Central Somalia, including Mogadishu, Joint report from the Danish Immigration Service’s and the Norwegian Landinfo’s fact finding mission to Nairobi, Kenya and Mogadishu, Somalia, 17 to 28 October 2012 Iran ‐ On Conversion to Christianity, Issues concerning Kurds and Post‐2009 Election Protestors as well as Legal Issues and Exit Procedures, Joint report from the Danish Immigration Service, the Norwegian LANDINFO and Danish Refugee Council’s fact‐finding mission to Tehran, Iran, Ankara, Turkey and London, United Kingdom, 9 November to 20 November 2012 and 8 January to 9 January 2013 Somalia ‐ Security and protection in Mogadishu and South‐Central Somalia Joint report from the Danish Immigration Service’s and the Norwegian Landinfo’s fact finding mission to Nairobi, Kenya and Mogadishu, Somalia 6 April to 7 May 2013 Iranian Kurds; On Conditions for Iranian Kurdish Parties in Iran and KRI, Activities in the Kurdish Area of Iran, Conditions in Border Area and Situation of Returnees from KRI to Iran, Joint report from the Danish Immigration Service’s and Danish Refugee Council’s fact finding mission to Erbil and Sulaimania, KRI, 30 May to 9 June 2013 Uganda ‐ Situation of LGBT persons in Uganda. Joint report from the Danish Immigration Service’s and the Danish Refugee Council’s fact finding mission to Kampala, Uganda from 16 to 25 June 2013 Update on security and protection issues in Mogadishu and South‐Central Somalia, Including information on the judiciary, issuance of documents, money transfers, marriage procedures and medical treatment, Joint report from the Danish Immigration Service’s and the Norwegian Landinfo’s fact finding mission to Nairobi, Kenya and Mogadishu, Somalia, 1 to 15 November 2013 Update on the Situation for Christian Converts in Iran, report from the Danish Immigration Service’s fact‐finding mission to Istanbul and Ankara, Turkey and London, United Kingdom 25 March to 2 April 2014 and 10 April to 11 April 2014 Eritrea – Drivers and Root Causes of Emigration, National Service and the Possibility of Return, Appendix edition, Country of Origin Information for Use in the Asylum Determination Process. Report from the Danish Immigration Service’s fact finding missions to Ethiopia and Eritrea, August and October 2014 Security and human rights in Chechnya Table of contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction and methodology ................................................................................................................. 4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Recent developments ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Disclaimer ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. General security and human rights situation in Chechnya ...................................................................... 9 1.1 Rule of law and avenues to seek redress ................................................................................................. 12 1.1.1 Cases illustrative of the human rights and rule of law situation in Chechnya ................................. 16 1.2 European Court of Human Rigths (ECHR) cases concerning ill-treatment, torture and disappearances 19 1.3 Chechens leaving the republic ................................................................................................................. 20 2. Illegal armed groups – size, structure and leadership, recruitment, supporters .....................................23 2.1 Size ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Leadership and structure ......................................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Activities ................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.4 Contact with local population .................................................................................................................. 27 2.5 Recruitment .............................................................................................................................................. 30 2.6 Financial support ...................................................................................................................................... 30 2.7 Links to international Jihad ...................................................................................................................... 30 3. Investigation and prosecution of members of the illegal armed groups .................................................31 3.1 Police units involved in investigation of illegal armed groups ................................................................. 32 3.2 Campaign against salafism ....................................................................................................................... 32 4. Situation of supporters of the illegal armed groups ..............................................................................34 4.1 The scale of court cases involving support to the insurgents .................................................................. 34 4.2 Fabricated criminal cases, forced confessions, detention and ill-treatment ........................................... 35 4.2.1 Typical false or fabricated charges ................................................................................................... 42 4.2.2 Treatment of alleged supporters and their relatives ........................................................................ 43 4.2.3 Jury trials ........................................................................................................................................... 44 4.3 Sentences ................................................................................................................................................. 45 4.3.1 Location for serving a prison sentence ............................................................................................. 46 4.4 Orders to appear for questioning/police summons (повестка) .............................................................. 46 4.4.1 Forged orders to appear ................................................................................................................... 48 4.5 Duty to report........................................................................................................................................... 49 4.6 Recruitment of informants ....................................................................................................................... 50 4.7 Reprisals against informants by the illegal armed groups ....................................................................... 51 1 Security and human rights in Chechnya 4.8 Family members to active members of the illegal armed groups and family members to supporters of the illegal armed groups ................................................................................................................................ 51 5. Arrests and prosecution of participants in the first and second war in Chechnya...............................54 6. Physical examination for bruises, scars or signs of torture ....................................................................55 7. Freedom of movement in Chechnya – check points/road blocks, internal borders .................................56 9. Russian language in Chechnya .............................................................................................................58 9.1 Police and court language ........................................................................................................................ 59 10. Social and economic situation in Chechnya.........................................................................................60 10.1 Employment ........................................................................................................................................... 60 10.1.1 Unemployment benefits ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jews – Kazan – Mafia – Pensioners – Forced Evictions – Department of Internal Affairs – State Protection – Internal Relocation – Israel
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: RUS17524 Country: Russia Date: 21 September 2005 Keywords: Russia – Jews – Kazan – Mafia – Pensioners – Forced evictions – Department of Internal Affairs – State protection – Internal relocation – Israel This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Please provide details of any discrimination against Jews in Russia, particularly in the Kazan area. 2. Please provide details of any mafia type activity in the area, particularly against pensioners, including attempts to evict them. 3. Please advise regarding role of the Government in increasing fees for pensioners occupying public facilities and the role of the Department of Internal Affairs in the Vakhitovsky region. 4. Does the government provide any assistance against the mafia in this area/city/province? 5. Can a Jewish woman move anywhere else where she would receive more protection from the government? 6. Please advise on a Jewish person's rights to reside in Israel, if any. RESPONSE 1. Please provide details of any discrimination against Jews in Russia, particularly in the Kazan area. Background According to the International Religious Freedom Report 2004, from a population of approximately 144 million “an estimated 600,000 to 1 million Jews remain in the country (0.5 percent of the total population) following large-scale emigration over the last 2 decades” (US Department of State 2004, Russia in International Religious Freedom Report 2004, 15 September, Section I.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction, Main Projects
    1520 GROUP OF COMPANIES PRESENTATION ABOUT COMPANY The 1520 Group of Companies is one of the largest production and construction holdings in Russia concentrated on the design and construction of railways. Group’s global reach covers the entire Russian railway track with a track gauge of 1,520 mm — from the Baltics to the Pacific Ocean. The Group employs over 20 thousand people. The 1520 Group of Companies focuses on complex construction, renovation and overhaul of railway infrastructure facilities of any complexity level, design and survey work, production of structures, assemblies and parts, construction and maintenance of highways. The 1520 Group of Companies is participating in the modernization and development of the «Eastern Polygon» — the Trans-Siberian and Baikal-Amur Mainlines, in the renovation and development of the Moscow Transport Hub as well as in other major projects intended for the integrated development of the railway infrastructure in the Russian Federation. The 1520 Group of Companies is a highly professional team of managers, designers, engineers and experts specialized in complicated construction- related fields who have unique experience in the railway and road construction in any climatic conditions. The 1520 Group of Companies is headed by Alexey Krapivin. 2 The 1520 GROUP OF COMPANIES is comprised of the following companies and enterprises: PROJECT DIVISION: ROSZHELDORPROJECT Moscow and 18 branches across Russia LENGIPROTRANS Saint-Petersburg DALGIPROTRANS Khabarovsk CONSTRUCTION DIVISION: BAMSTROYMEKHANIZATZIYA
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Engineering Research, volume 177 International Symposium on Engineering and Earth Sciences (ISEES 2018) Unique Natural Objects of Mountain Landscapes of the Chechen Republic Zaburayeva Kh.Sh. Gatsayeva L.S. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov, Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Oil and Gas Grozny, Russia Grozny State Oil Technical University [email protected] named M.D. Millionshchikov Grozny, Russia [email protected] Gayrabekov U.T. Dzhabrailov S.-E.M. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Faculty of Geography and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Chechen State University Russian Academy of Sciences, Grozny, Russia Faculty of Geography and Geoecology [email protected] Chechen State University Grozny, Russia [email protected] Daukayev Asl.A. Sediyeva M.B. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov, Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences Department of Earth Sciences Grozny, Russia Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic [email protected] Grozny, Russia [email protected] Abumuslimova I.A. Department of Biological and Medical Studies Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic Grozny, Russia indira_anChechen [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation State Actors of Protection
    European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Russian Federation State Actors of Protection March 2017 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Russian Federation State Actors of Protection March 2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Free phone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Print ISBN 978-92-9494-372-9 doi: 10.2847/502403 BZ-04-17-273-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9494-373-6 doi: 10.2847/265043 BZ-04-17-273-EN-C © European Asylum Support Office 2017 Cover photo credit: JessAerons – Istockphoto.com Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO Country of Origin Report: Russian Federation – State Actors of Protection — 3 Acknowledgments EASO would like to acknowledge the following national COI units and asylum and migration departments as the co-authors of this report: Belgium, Cedoca (Center for Documentation and Research), Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons Poland, Country of Origin Information Unit, Department for Refugee Procedures, Office for Foreigners Sweden, Lifos, Centre for Country of Origin Information and Analysis, Swedish Migration Agency Norway, Landinfo, Country of
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sector Field Directory
    HEALTH SECTOR FIELD DIRECTORY Republic of Chechnya Republic of Ingushetia Russian Federation June 2004 World Health Organization Nazran, Republic of Ingushetia TABLE OF CONTENTS ORGANIZATION 1. Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) 2. CARE Canada 3. Centre for Peacemaking and Community Development (CPCD) 4. Danish Refugee Council/Danish Peoples Aid (DRC/DPA) 5. Hammer FOrum e. V. 6. Handicap International 7. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) 8. International Humanitarian Initiative (IHI) 9. International Medical Corps (IMC) 10. Islamic Relief (IR) 11. International Rescue Committee (IRC) 12. Medecins du Monde (MDM) 13. Medecins Sans Frontieres – Belgium (MSF-B) 14. Error! Reference source not found. 15. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Holland (MSF-H) 16. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Switzerland (MSF-CH) 17. Memorial 18. People in Need (PIN) 19. Polish Humanitarian Organisation (PHO) 20. Save the Generation 21. SERLO 22. UNICEF 23. World Vision 24. World Health Organization (WHO) 2 Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) Sector: Health; Food; Non-Food Items; Education Location: Chechnya and Ingushetia Objectives: To render psychosocial support to people affected by the conflict; to provide specialised medical services for women and medical aid for the IDP population; to support education and recreational activities; to supply supplementary food products to vulnerable IDP categories with specific nutritional needs; to provide basic hygienic items and clothes for new-born; to help the IDP community to establish a support system for its members making use of available resources. Beneficiaries: IDP children, youth, women and men in Ingushetia and residents in Chechnya Partners: UNICEF, SDC/SHA CONTACT INFORMATION: INGUSHETIA Moscow Karabulak, Evdoshenko St.
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasus Emirates
    Caucasus Emirates The threats against the 2014 Winter Olympics put a spotlight on the Caucasus Emirates, a separatist Islamic extremist group in the Russian Federation loosely aligned with Al Qaeda. Although the Emirates’ purported primary aim is to create a state independent of Russia, its increased incorporation of extremist ideology and anti-Semitism into its mission heighten its inclination for acts of terrorism, while providing fodder for its growth. Founded in 2007 by Doku Umarov, former president of a self-proclaimed Chechen secessionist government, the Caucasus Emirates serves as an umbrella group for a number of smaller extremist and separatist organizations operating out of the Caucasus area, which includes Chechnya and Dagestan. Its stated goal is to create an independent Islamist theocracy in the Muslim-populated areas of Russia. The organization brought together a number of independent groups that had been fighting Russia for independence for decades, but whose leadership had been largely decimated by Russian forces. Although it was founded in 2007, the only emerged as a more active organization with a series of claimed attacks between 2009 and 2011. These attacks included a June 2009 sniper attack on the Dagestan Ministry of the Interior that resulted in three deaths; a September 2009 suicide bombing in Makhachkala, Dagestan that resulted in twelve deaths; the bombing of a train that resulted in 27 deaths and 100 injuries; a March 2010 bomb of the Moscow metro that resulted in 40 deaths and 100 injuries; an August 2010 attack by 60 militants 1 / 4 on a Chechen village that resulted in 6 deaths and 24 injuries; and a January 2011 bombing of the Domodedovo airport in Moscow that resulted in 37 deaths and 180 injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMANITARIAN AID for the Victims of the Chechnya Conflict in the Caucasus
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID for the victims of the Chechnya conflict in the Caucasus GLOBAL PLAN 2007 Humanitarian Aid Committee – December 2006 ECHO/-EE/BUD/2007/01000 1 Table of contents Explanatory Memorandum page 1) Executive summary..................................................................................... 3 2) Context and situation.................................................................................. 3 2.1.) General Context.................................................................................... 3 2.2.) Current Situation.................................................................................. 4 3) Identification and assessment of humanitarian needs.............................. 5 4) Proposed DG ECHO strategy....................................................................... 8 4.1.) Coherence with DG ECHO´s overall strategic priorities.................... 8 4.2.) Impact of previous humanitarian response......................................... 9 4.3.) Coordination with activities of other donors and institutions............ 10 4.4.) Risk assessment and assumptions........................................................ 10 4.5.) DG ECHO Strategy.................................................................................11 4.6.) Duration............................................................................................. 12 4.7.) Amount of decision and strategic programming matrix..................... 13 5) Evaluation.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya
    Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Egor Lazarev All rights reserved ABSTRACT Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev This dissertation explores how the social and political consequences of armed conflict affect legal pluralism; specifically, the coexistence of Russian state law, Sharia, and customary law in Chechnya. The study draws on qualitative and quantitative data gathered during seven months of fieldwork in Chechnya. The data include over one hundred semistructured interviews with legal authorities and religious and traditional leaders; an original survey of the population; and a novel dataset of all civil and criminal cases heard in state courts. First, the dissertation argues that armed conflict disrupted traditional social hierarchies in Chechnya, which paved the way for state penetration into Chechen society. The conflict particularly disrupted gender hierarchies. As a result of the highly gendered nature of the conflict, women in Chechnya became breadwinners in their families and gained experience in serving important social roles, most notably as interlocutors between communities and different armed groups. This change in women’s bargaining power within households and increase in their social status came into conflict with the patriarchal social order, which was based on men’s rigid interpretations of religious and customary norms. In response, women started utilizing the state legal system, a system that at least formally acknowledges gender equality, in contrast to customary law and Sharia.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian-Speaking
    NOVEMBER 2017 ‘RUSSIAN-SPEAKING’ FIGHTERS IN SYRIA, IRAQ AND AT HOME: CONSEQUENCES AND CONTEXT FULL REPORT Mark Youngman and Dr Cerwyn Moore Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies Department of Political Science and International Studies University of Birmingham This report was produced out of the Actors and Narratives programme, funded by CREST. To find out more information about this programme, and to see other outputs from the team, visit the CREST website at: https://crestresearch.ac.uk/projects/actors-and-narratives/ About the authors: Mark Youngman is an ESRC-funded doctoral student and Cerwyn Moore a Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies at the University of Birmingham. Disclaimer: This report has been part funded by an ESRC IAA award and part funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1). It draws on the existing work of the authors, and supplements their work with original research and ongoing data collection of Russian-speaking foreign fighters.www.crestresearch.co.uk The cover image, Caucasus Emirate, is a remixed derivative ofProposed divisions of the Caucasus Emirate by ArnoldPlaton, under CC BY-SA 3.0. Caucasus Emirate is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. by R. Stevens, CREST. ©2017 CREST Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence. www.crestresearch.ac.uk/copyright CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................4 PART I: ASSESSING THE ‘RUSSIAN-SPEAKING’
    [Show full text]
  • Russia the Ingush-Ossetian Conflict in the Prigorodnyi Region
    Russia Page 1 of 32 RUSSIA THE INGUSH-OSSETIAN CONFLICT IN THE PRIGORODNYI REGION Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch New York · Washington · London · Brussels Copyright © May 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalogue Number: 96-75960 ISBN: 1-56432-165-7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is based on a trip to the Republic of Ingushetiya, hereafter Ingushetiya, and the Republic of North Ossetia- Alaniya, hereafter North Ossetia, both states of the Russian Federation, from August 11-19, 1994. Until 1994, North Ossetia was the North Ossetian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), a part of the former Soviet Union. Until 1992, Ingushetiya was part of the Checheno-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), and was also part of the former Soviet Union. Human Rights/Helsinki representatives visited Vladikavkaz, Kartsa, Chermen, Tarskoye, Kurtat, Dachnoye, and Maiskii in North Ossetia and Nazran and Gaziyurt in Ingushetiya. Jeri Laber and Rachel Denber edited the report, and Shira Robinson provided production assistance for its publication. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki thanks both North Ossetian and Ingush authorities as well as officials from the Russian Temporary Administration (now the Temporary State Committee) for their cooperation with the mission participants. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki would like to express our appreciation to all those who read the report and commented on it, including Prof. John Collarusso of McMaster University. We would also like to thank the members of the Russian human rights group Memorial, who provided generous assistance and advice. In 1994 Memorial published an excellent report on the conflict in the Prigorodnyi region, "Two Years after the War: The Problem of the Forcibly Displaced in the Area of the Ossetian-Ingush Conflict." Finally, we would like to thank the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Henry Jackson Fund, the Merck Fund and the Moriah Fund for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Chechen War: the Information Component
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The Second Chechen War: The Information Component by Emil Pain, Former Russian Ethno-national Relations Advisor Translated by Mr. Robert R. Love Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS. This article appeared in The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file a Military Review July-August 2000 In December 1994 Russian authorities made their first attempt to crush Chechen separatism militarily. However, after two years of bloody combat the Russian army was forced to withdraw from the Chechen Republic. The obstinacy of the Russian authorities who had decided on a policy of victory in Chechnya resulted in the deaths of at least 30,000 Chechens and 5,000 Russian soldiers.1 This war, which caused an estimated $5.5 billion in economic damage, was largely the cause of Russia's national economic crisis in 1998, when the Russian government proved unable to service its huge debts.2 It seemed that after the 1994-1996 war Russian society and the federal government realized the ineffectiveness of using colonial approaches to resolve ethnopolitical issues.3 They also understood, it seemed, the impossibility of forcibly imposing their will upon even a small ethnoterritorial community if a significant portion of that community is prepared to take up arms to defend its interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17
    [Show full text]