DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

110765-RU DOCUMENT OF THE WORLD BANK GROUP Public Disclosure Authorized FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized RUSSIAN FEDERATION SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC: PATHWAYS TO INCLUSIVE GROWTH DECEMBER 16, 2016 EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. i CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Exchange Rate Effective December 6, 2016 Currency Unit – Ruble US$ 1 = Ruble 63.9242 FISCAL YEAR [January 1 – December 31] ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ALMP Active labor market programs GCI Global Competitiveness Index ANS Adjusted net savings GDP Gross domestic product ASI Agency for Strategic Initiatives GOST State standard (gosudarstvennyy standart in Russian) AVTODOR Russian Highways State Company GNRI Global Networked Readiness Index B40 Bottom 40 percent of the income GMM Generalized Method of Moments distribution statistical methodology BEEPS Business Environment and GRECO Group of States against Corruption Enterprise Performance Survey BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China, and GVC Global value chains South Africa (emerging economies) CBR Central Bank of Russia HBS Household Budget Survey CIT Corporate income tax ICT Information and communications technology ECD Early childhood development IEA International Education Association DAI Digital Adoption Index IFC International Finance Corporation DIA Deposit Insurance Authority IFFs Illicit financial flows EACU Eurasian Customs Union IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards EBRD European Bank for INDC Intended Nationally Determined Reconstruction and Development Contributions ECA Eastern and Central Europe IT Information technology EEU Eurasian Economic Union LCA Latent class analysis FAS Federal Antimonopoly Service LFS Labor Force Survey FBS Federal Bailiff Service LITS Life in Transition Survey FDI Foreign direct investment LNG Liquefied natural gas FTS Federal Tax Service LPI Logistics Performance Index MFN Most favored nation RVC Russia Venture Corporation MIGA Multilateral Investment RZD National railway company Guarantee Agency NCD Noncommunicable disease SCD Systematic Country Diagnostic NDC National Defined Contribution SEZ Special economic zone ii NPLs Nonperforming loans SMEs Small-and medium-sized enterprises NTB Nontariff barriers SOE State-owned enterprise NTM Nontariff measure SPS Sanitary and phytosanitary OECD Organization for Economic Co- STI Science, Technology, and Innovation operation and Development OOP Out-of-pocket T60 Top 60 percent of the income distribution PAYG Pay as you go TBT Technical Barriers to Trade PCM Price-cost margin TFP Total factor productivity PIACC Program for the International TFPQ Physical TFP Assessment of Adult Competencies PIRLS Progress in International Reading TFPR Revenue TFP Literacy PISA Program of International Student TVET Technical and vocational education and Assessment training PIT Personal income tax VAT Value-added tax PPP Purchasing power parity VEB Vnesheconombank PPPs Public-private partnerships WDI World Development Indicators R&D Research and development WTO World Trade Organization RLMS Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey IBRD IFC Regional Vice President: Cyril Muller Global Client Services Vice President: Dimitris Tsitsiragos Country Director: Andras Horvai Regional Director: Tomasz Telma Senior Director: Carlos Felipe Jaramillo/Ana Revenga Regional Strategy Head: George Konda Practice Manager: Miria Pigato/Carolina Sanchez Task Team Leader: Iuliia Mironova Task Team Leader: Birgit Hansl/ Emily Sinnott iii Acknowledgments The Russian Federation Systematic Diagnostic: Pathways to Inclusive Growth was written by a team co-led by Birgit Hansl (Lead Economist) and Emily Sinnott (Senior Economist). It was prepared by a team from across the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC), under the guidance of Cyril Muller (Vice President, Europe and Central Asia), Dimitris Tsitsiragos (Vice President, Global Client Services, IFC), Andras Horvai (Country Director) and Tomasz Telma (Regional Director, IFC). The IFC contributions to the report were provided by a team from industry and advisory services departments led by Iuliia Mironova (Strategy Officer, IFC). Dorota Nowak (Country Program Coordinator) and George Konda (Regional Strategy Head, Principal Economist, IFC) provided guidance and support throughout the process. The team appreciates the advice received throughout the preparation process from Ana Revenga (Deputy Chief Economist), Satu Kahkonen (Director), Miria Pigato (Practice Manager) and Carolina Sanchez Paramo (Practice Manager). Ambar Narayan (Lead Economist) from the SCD Advisory Group provided valuable insights on the report. We also thank the peer reviewers: Deborah Wetzel (Senior Director); Sergei Shatalov (Lead Strategy Officer); Luis-Felipe Lopez-Calva (Lead Economist); and Nancy Benjamin (Senior Country Economist) for their excellent comments and inputs. Many staff contributed to this report, with inputs to specific chapters as well as the preparation of a series of background papers that helped inform this comprehensive diagnostic. Chapter 1: Macroeconomic and Shared Prosperity Trends was led by Birgit Hansl and Emily Sinnott, with contributions from Aurelien Kruse (GMF09); Giorgia Demarchi (GPVGE); Mikhail Matytsin (GPV03); Markus Brueckner (GMF04); Olga Emelyanova (GMF09); and Irina Rostovtseva (ECCU1). Chapter 2: Pathway One: Increasing Productivity for Diversified Growth was led by Birgit Hansl, with inputs from Sylvie Bossoutrot, (ECCU1); Rolf Behrndt (GMF09); Iuliia Mironova (CBCCE); Sergei Mytarev (CNGF8); Michael Edwards (GFM09); Juan Navas-Sabater (GTI09); Carlo Maria Rossotto (GTI11), Ana Paula Cusolito (GTCIE); Aurelien Kruse (GMF09); Mustapha Benmaamar (GTI03); Jung Eun Oh (GTI02); Daniel Alberto Benitez (GTI04); Natalija Gelvanovska (GTI09); Sanju Vaswani (CTTTT); Oleg Petrov (GTI09); Alexey Zhikharev (CA SEE); Justin Piers William Hill (GTCIE); Ljudmilla Poznanskaya (GTC10); Georgiana Pop (GTCTC); Gregory Kisunko (GGO15); Katerina Levitanskaya (GFM09); Kirill Vasiliev (GED03); Hernan Winkler (ECACE); Evgenia Epaneshnikova (GTI03); Tatyana Ponomareva (GTC10); Yanina Ermakova (ECCU1); Aleksandra Durova (GTI03); Mikhail Bunchuk (ECCU1); Olga Emelyanova (GMF09); Irina Rostovtseva (ECCU1); Greg Alton (CFGS8); Kristina Turilova (CASSC) and Antonio Skarica (CBCCE). Chapter 3: Pathway Two: Reducing Vulnerability by Deepening Human Capital Gains and Improving Access to Services was led by Emily Sinnott, with inputs from Aleksandra Posarac (GSP03); Ruslan Yemtsov (GSPDR); Zoran Anusic (GSP03); Aparnaa Somanathan (GHN03); Giorgia Demarchi (GPVGE); Sevil Salakhutdinova (GHN03); Mikhail Matytsin (GPV03), Dmitry Chugunov (GED03) Tigran Shmis (GED03) and Sergey Kozhukhov (CMGCS). Chapter 4: Requisites: Fiscal Sustainability, Good Governance and Better Natural Resource Management was led by Birgit Hansl, with inputs from Amitabha Mukherjee (GGO15); Iuliia Mironova (CBCCE); Emilia Battaglini (GEN03); Marianne Grosclaude (GFA03); Aurelien Kruse (GMF09); Artavazd Hakobyan (GFA03); Rajul Awashti (GGO28); Vladislava Nemova (GEN03); Eva Maria Melis (GGO15), Olga Emelyanova (GMF09), Simon Commander (ECACE); Izzah Akram Malik (GGO18), Natalia Kosheleva (CRKEU); Marina Frolova (CEUSB); Olga Schwartz (GGO15) and Irina Rostovtseva (ECCU1). Chapter 5: Policy Priorities and Actions was prepared by Giorgia Demarchi (GPVGE); Emily Sinnott; Birgit Hansl, with support from Irina Rostovtseva (ECCU1). iv The team would like to thank our counterparts in the Government of the Russian Federation, the private sector, academia and civil society, members of the World Bank Russia Country Team from all the World Bank Group Global Practices, and the IFC, who have participated in two substantive consultation events, and several follow-up meetings. We benefited greatly from their expertise and inputs in various forms. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Setting the Stage ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Pathway One: Increasing Productivity to Diversify Growth .................................................................... 13 Pathway Two: Deepening Human Capital Gains and Improving Access to Services ............................... 17 Requisites for Sustained, Inclusive Growth: Fiscal Sustainability, Good Governance, and Improved Management of Natural Resources ........................................................................................................ 22 Policy Priorities Emerging from the Diagnostic ....................................................................................... 27 Chapter 1. Macroeconomic and Shared Prosperity Trends ........................................................................ 31 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 31 Macroeconomic Stability during the Commodity Boom ......................................................................... 33 The Foundations of Stability and Growth ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Doing Business in Russia EY Sadovnicheskaya Nab., 77, Bld

    Doing Business in Russia EY Sadovnicheskaya Nab., 77, Bld

    Doing business in Russia EY Sadovnicheskaya nab., 77, bld. 1 115035, Moscow, Russia Paveletskaya Pl., 2, bld. 2 115054, Moscow, Russia Tel: +7 (495) 755 9700 Fax: +7 (495) 755 9701 2 Doing business in Russia Introduction This guide has been prepared by EY Russia to give the potential investor an insight into Russia and its economy and tax system, provide an overview of forms of business and accounting rules and answer questions that frequently arise for foreign businesses. Russia is a fast-developing country and is committed to improving the investment climate and developing a better legal environment for doing business. On the one hand, this makes doing business in Russia an attractive prospect; on the other, it can make for difficult decisions both when starting a business and further down the line. EY provides assurance, tax, legal, strategy, transactions and consulting services in 150 countries and employs over 300,000 professionals across the globe1, including more than 3,500 employees in 9 offices in Russia. EY possesses extensive, in-depth knowledge of Russian realities and is always ready to come to the assistance of first-time and experienced investors alike. This guide contains information current as at March 2021 (except where a later date is specified). You can find more information about doing business in Russia as well as up-to-date information on developments in its legal and tax environment on our website: www.ey.com/ru. 1 Who we are – Builders of a better working world | EY — Global Doing business in Russia 1 2 Doing business
  • Russian Withholding Tax Refund

    Russian Withholding Tax Refund

    Russian withholding tax refund Tax & Legal If you or your clients invested in Russian securities and are entitled to a substantial dividend or interest income, there is a chance that you overpaid your taxes and may qualify for a tax refund © 2018 Deloitte Consulting LLC Background Investors may apply a According to the The Russian The tax refund reduced tax rate for Russian tax withholding tax rate is practice in Russia is their interest and/or authorities, they are set at 15% on not well-developed: dividend income, ready to reimburse dividends and 20 the tax legislation depending on the overpaid taxes, if a percent on interest. does not provide for a conditions set by the full package of Effective from 1 specific list of Russian Tax Code or documents confirming January 2014, the documents to be applicable Double Tax the income payment duties of the tax collected and Treaties. Calculations chain and the agent for WHT requirements to be of a standard Russian investor’s rights to purposes were met. For these rate or the standard the income is transferred to the reasons, the process reduced Double Tax submitted. local Russian can be lengthy and Treaty rate, as well as custodian or, in a sometimes fruitless. submission of claims limited number of However, the trend is on tax can be cases, to the reassuring: the refunded, should be fiduciary, broker or number of successful made by investors issuer. refund claims and themselves within positive court three calendar years, decisions is growing. following the year in which it was withheld.
  • Lost for Words Maria Mikulcova

    Lost for Words Maria Mikulcova

    Lost for Words Effects of Soviet Language Policies on the Self-Identification of Buryats in Post-Soviet Buryatia Maria Mikulcova A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of MA Russian and Eurasian Studies Leiden University June 2017 Supervisor: Dr. E.L. Stapert i Abstract Throughout the Soviet rule Buryats have been subjected to interventionist legislation that affected not only their daily lives but also the internal cohesion of the Buryat group as a collective itself. As a result of these measures many Buryats today claim that they feel a certain degree of disconnection with their own ethnic self-perception. This ethnic estrangement appears to be partially caused by many people’s inability to speak and understand the Buryat language, thus obstructing their connection to ancient traditions, knowledge and history. This work will investigate the extent to which Soviet linguistic policies have contributed to the disconnection of Buryats with their own language and offer possible effects of ethnic language loss on the self-perception of modern day Buryats. ii iii Declaration I, Maria Mikulcova, declare that this MA thesis titled, ‘Lost for Words - Effects of Soviet Language Policies on the Self-Identification of Buryats in Post-Soviet Buryatia’ and the work presented in it are entirely my own. I confirm that: . This work was done wholly while in candidature for a degree at this University. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work.
  • Emerging Index - QSR

    Emerging Index - QSR

    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE RAFI Emerging Index - QSR Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index Index Index Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country weight (%) weight (%) weight (%) Absa Group Limited 0.29 SOUTH BRF S.A. 0.21 BRAZIL China Taiping Insurance Holdings (Red 0.16 CHINA AFRICA BTG Pactual Participations UNT11 0.09 BRAZIL Chip) Acer 0.07 TAIWAN BYD (A) (SC SZ) 0.03 CHINA China Tower (H) 0.17 CHINA Adaro Energy PT 0.04 INDONESIA BYD (H) 0.12 CHINA China Vanke (A) (SC SZ) 0.09 CHINA ADVANCED INFO SERVICE 0.16 THAILAND Canadian Solar (N Shares) 0.08 CHINA China Vanke (H) 0.2 CHINA Aeroflot Russian Airlines 0.09 RUSSIA Capitec Bank Hldgs Ltd 0.05 SOUTH Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (A) (SC 0.01 CHINA Agile Group Holdings (P Chip) 0.04 CHINA AFRICA SH) Agricultural Bank of China (A) (SC SH) 0.27 CHINA Catcher Technology 0.2 TAIWAN Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (H) 0.04 CHINA Agricultural Bank of China (H) 0.66 CHINA Cathay Financial Holding 0.29 TAIWAN Chunghwa Telecom 0.32 TAIWAN Air China (A) (SC SH) 0.02 CHINA CCR SA 0.14 BRAZIL Cia Paranaense de Energia 0.01 BRAZIL Air China (H) 0.06 CHINA Cemex Sa Cpo Line 0.7 MEXICO Cia Paranaense de Energia (B) 0.07 BRAZIL Airports of Thailand 0.04 THAILAND Cemig ON 0.03 BRAZIL Cielo SA 0.13 BRAZIL Akbank 0.18 TURKEY Cemig PN 0.18 BRAZIL CIFI Holdings (Group) (P Chip) 0.03 CHINA Al Rajhi Banking & Investment Corp 0.52 SAUDI Cencosud 0.04 CHILE CIMB Group Holdings 0.11 MALAYSIA ARABIA Centrais Eletricas Brasileiras S.A.
  • Expert Survey on the Quality of Government in Russia's Regions Is Credible Information About the Regional

    Expert Survey on the Quality of Government in Russia's Regions Is Credible Information About the Regional

    EXPERT SURVEY ON THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT IN RUSSIA’S REGIONS: A REPORT MARINA NISTOTSKAYA ANNA KHAKHUNOVA CARL DAHLSTRÖM WORKING PAPER SERIES 2015:16 QOG THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Box 711, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG October 2015 ISSN 1653-8919 © 2015 by Marina Nistotskaya, Anna Khakhunova, Carl Dahlström. All rights reserved. Expert Survey on the Quality of Government in Russia’s Regions: A Report Marina Nistotskaya, Anna Khakhunova, Carl Dahlström QoG Working Paper Series 2015:16 October 2016 ISSN 1653-8919 SUMMARY The Expert Survey on the Quality of Government in Russia’s regions (Russia’s Regions’ QoG Expert Survey) focuses on the organizational design of public bureaucracy and bu- reaucratic behavior in Russia’s regions It is based on the subjective assessment of carefully selected experts 466 experts agreed to participate pro bono 311 questionnaires were completed The questionnaire includes 42 substantive questions, yielding 48 region-level indicators Geographical coverage: 79 regions out of 83 (at the time of the study) 64 regions have three or more experts There are two datasets, one individual-level and one region-level Suggested report citation: Nistotskaya, Marina, Anna Khakhunova and Carl Dahlström. 2015. Ex- pert Survey on the Quality of Government in Russia’s Regions: Report. Gothenburg: The QoG Working Paper Series 2015:16 Suggested data citation: Nistotskaya, Marina, Anna Khakhunova and Carl Dahlström. 2015. Expert Survey on the Quality of Government in
  • DISCUSSION PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized

    DISCUSSION PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized

    SOCIAL PROTECTION & JOBS DISCUSSION PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized No. 1931 | MAY 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Can Local Participatory Programs Enhance Public Confidence: Insights from the Local Initiatives Support Program in Russia Public Disclosure Authorized Ivan Shulga, Lev Shilov, Anna Sukhova, and Peter Pojarski Public Disclosure Authorized © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1 (202) 473 1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington,
  • US Sanctions on Russia

    US Sanctions on Russia

    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
  • Share Listing

    Share Listing

    Annual Report 2018 | MAGNIT MAGNIT TODAY 3-11 99 STRATEGIC REPORT 13-27 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 29-53 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 55-113 APPENDICES 115-189 Structure of share capital1 Name Number of registered entities Proportion of authorized capital, % National Settlement Depositary 1 95.54 Including: PJSC VTB Bank 18.342 LLC VTB Infrastructure Investments 7.723 Legal entities and individuals 24 4.46 Total: 25 100 Share listing Listing of shares on the Moscow Exchange The Company’s shares have been listed on the Moscow Stock Exchange since April 24, 2006 (MGNT ticker) and are included in the first quotation list. The shares are included in the following indices: Stock Subindex, MOEX Index, MOEX Index 10, Blue Chip Index, Broad Market Index, Consumer Sector Index / Consumer Sector Index, RTS Consumer Sector Index, RTS Index, and Broad Market RTS Index, among others. 1. Shareholding structure is provided in accordance with the list of shareholders registered in the register of PJSC “Magnit” shareholders as of 31.12.2018 2. Information is provided as of 12.11.2018 based on the list of shareholders entitled to participate in the general shareholders meeting of PJSC “Magnit 3. Information is provided as of 12.11.2018 based on the list of shareholders entitled to participate in the general shareholders meeting of PJSC “Magnit 100 101 Weight of shares in indices Ticker Index name Weight in index, % RDXUSD Russian Depositary Index USD 2.85 RDX Russian Depositary Index EUR 2.85 NU137529 MSCI EM IMI (VRS Taxes) Net Return USD Index 0.09 RIOB FTSE Russia IOB
  • Dmitri V. Kovalenko

    Dmitri V. Kovalenko

    Dmitri V. Kovalenko Partner, Moscow Mergers and Acquisitions; Private Equity; Capital Markets Dmitri Kovalenko is co-head of the Moscow office and represents international and Russian clients on a broad range of mergers and acquisitions, private equity and joint venture transac- tions in Russia and other countries covering various industries and sectors. Mr. Kovalenko has practiced law in Skadden’s Moscow, Chicago and Paris offices since 1994. He is ranked in the top tier for Russia M&A and Russia capital markets work by Chambers Global and Chambers Europe, as well as for private equity in Russia by Chambers Europe. Mr. Kovalenko also was named as the 2021 Mergers and Acquisitions Lawyer of the Year and the 2020 Capital Markets Lawyer of the Year by The Best Lawyers in Russia, and was listed in the publication’s Global Business Edition. Additionally, he is listed as a leading individual in IFLR1000 and Who’s Who Legal, as well as repeatedly in The Legal 500 EMEA as a member of its Commercial, Corporate and M&A: Moscow Hall of Fame. T: 7.495.797.4600 F: 7.495.797.4601 His M&A and private equity experience has included advising: [email protected] - Mercury Retail Group in its US$1.2 billion sale of JSC Dixy Group to PJSC Magnit; - Horvik Limited in relation to its preconditional mandatory offer to acquire Trans-Siberian Gold Education plc, an AIM-quoted gold producer; LL.M. (with honors), Northwestern - Kismet Acquisition One, a special purpose acquisition company, in its US$1.9 billion initial University School of Law, Chicago, merger with Nexters Global Limited, the first-ever de-SPAC transaction involving a Russian USA, 1996 company.
  • Annual Report 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02

    Annual Report 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02

    AnnuAl RepoRt 2018 ABOUT THIS REPORT 02 1 / 2 ABOUT THIS REPORT Approach to the Report Boundaries of the Report Approval of the Report This Annual Report of Sberbank of Russia ¹ for 2018 (the “Report”) The financial data are presented in the Report Information on sustainable development is consoli- This Report received preliminary approv- in accordance with the IFRS consolidated financial dated by the major participants of the Group, which al by the Supervisory Board of Sberbank includes the performance results of Sberbank and its subsidiaries ² statements, unless otherwise specified in the text of have a significant impact on their regions of pres- (Minutes No. 11 of April 16, 2019). for the reporting period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. the Report. ence, and Sberbank Corporate University. The reliability of the data in the Report was con- Operational data are presented for PJSC Sberbank firmed by the Audit Committee of Sberbank. unless otherwise specified in the text of the Report. The Report has been prepared in accordance with In addition, the contents of the Report The Report was approved by the Annual General the legislation of the Russian Federation, including: comply with the following documents: Shareholder Meeting of Sberbank as of May 24, 2019 (Minutes No 32 as of May 29, 2019). ♦ Federal Law No. 39-FZ “On the Securities ♦ Requirements of the Moscow Stock The term “Group” as used in the sections “People: Nurturing New Skills in Effective Teams” Market” dated April 22,1996; Exchange on the preparation of annu- and “Impact on Society” includes Sberbank Corporate University and the following: al reports by joint stock companies; ♦ Federal Law No.
  • Identifying Russia's Structural Leaders

    Identifying Russia's Structural Leaders

    June 7, 2011 GS SUSTAIN Equity Research Identifying Russia’s structural leaders Identifying long-term winners with SUSTAIN Russia Structural Leaders List We have applied the GS SUSTAIN framework to We have identified eight companies that have RUSSIA STRUCTURAL LEADERS 75 companies across our Russian coverage to delivered and in our view will continue to deliver y identify those well positioned to deliver long-term industry leading cash returns: Mechel, EDCL, Company Sector quality quartile position quartile Management CROCI CROCI average 2011- % 13E, CROCI change 2006-10, % quartile CROCI outperformance through sustained high cash Alliance Oil, Rosneft and Novatek in the natural Novatek Energy 32.1% 0.3% 1 1 1 Oil Serv & Pipe Eurasia Drilling Co 28.2% -2.1% 2 1 1 returns. The framework combines forecast cash resources space and Magnit, Cherkizovo and M- producers Mechel Steel 21.9% -0.6% 2 1 1 returns with objective measures of industry Video in the consumer segment. Investing in this Alliance Oil CompaEnergy 17.4% 0.8% 2 1 1 Magnit (GDR) Consumer 17.1% -0.2% 2 1 1 positioning and management quality, which in a list of companies would have generated over Cherkizovo Group Consumer 16.1% 1.2% 2 1 2 M-VIDEO Consumer 15.0% 1.4% 2 1 2 Russian context focus predominantly on 300% outperformance vs. the MSCI Russia since Rosneft Energy 13.9% 1.0% 2 1 2 ownership and corporate governance issues. January 2006. RUSSIA STRUCTURAL LEADERS WATCH LIST Russia at the intersection of global structural Russia Structural Leaders Watch List Company Sector dust y CROCI average 2011-13E, % CROCI change 2006-10, % quartile CROCI position quartile Management quality quartile trends Disclosure remains sub par in many Russian Uralkali Mining 38.3% 2.4% 1 1 3 Globaltrans Transport 20.3% 2.3% 1 1 3 Oil Serv & Pipe Russia’s economy and equity market are corporates and is the main reason why a number ChelPipe 18.0% -1.3% 2 1 3 producers undergoing a dramatic transformation through of companies that are forecast to generate Mail.ru Group Ltd.
  • Factsheet: DWS Russia

    Factsheet: DWS Russia

    Marketing Material Factsheet: DWS Russia Equity Funds - Emerging Markets August 2021 As at 31/08/2021 Fund Data Performance Investment Policy Performance - Share Class LC (in %) Equities of selected small, medium-sized and large Russian companies that we believe have a strong market position and good growth prospects; see the sales prospectus for details of the risks of focusing on a certain geographical area. Fund Benchmark* *Benchmark: MSCI Russia 10/40 (RI) ab 1.4.07 (vorher MSCI Russia Capped) Fund Management's Comment Calculation of performance is based on the time-weighted return and excludes front-end fees. Individual costs such as fees, commissions and other charges have not been included in this presentation and would have an adverse impact on returns if they were included. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. While Inflation surprised to the lower side lately, President Vladimir Putin announcement of two one-off payments to pensioners and military service personnel, which are to be Cumulative performance (in %) - share class LC dispensed in the coming quarters, are going 1 m 1 y 3 y 5 y s. Inception YTD 3 y avg 5 y avg 2017 2018 2019 2020 to slightly boost inflation and GDP at the same time, and are coming right ahead of the parliamentary elections. The majority of EUR 3.1 32.4 69.9 90.7 248.5 25.5 19.3 13.8 -10.0 -0.5 43.3 -6.7 Russian listed companies posted their BM IN EUR 2.0 31.5 64.6 89.5 531.0 23.3 18.1 13.6 -11.6 4.4 47.6 -11.2 earnings releases, resulting in positive sentiment on the market, and although an accident at a Gazprom facility was a short term headwind, the impact on production was considered limited.