WRDS) Library

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

For additional information about this document and the document conversion process, please contact WRDS at [email protected] and include the phrase “Digital Documents” in your subject heading.

To view other documents please visit the WRDS Library online at: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu

Mailing Address: Water Resources Data System University of Wyoming, Dept 3943 1000 E University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071

Physical Address: Wyoming Hall, Room 249 University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071

Phone: (307) 766-6651 Fax: (307) 766-3785

Funding for WRDS and the creation of this electronic document was provided by the Wyoming Water Development Commission (http://wwdc.state.wy.us)

Final Report

Hanna Water System Level II Study

A Wyoming Water Development Commission Project WWDC Project No. 05SC0295412

October 2014

PPMMPPCC Saratoga, Wyoming

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...... 1 TASK 1 – SCOPING AND PROJECT MEETINGS ...... 3 TASK 2 – REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION ...... 7 TASK 3 – POPULATION GROWTH AND WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS .. 11 TASK 4 – INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM ..... 12 2012 MASTER PLAN AND ALTERNATIVES ...... 12 Replace All Cast Iron Pipes with PVC...... 12 Replace Water line from the School Monument to Front Street, and Clark St. to Jefferson...... 13 Line into Recreation Center from Feldspar to Recreation Center...... 13 Replace Undersized Lines in Elmo...... 13 New Connection to Elmo ...... 13 Replacement of Gate Valves ...... 14 Replacement of Hydrants ...... 14 Replacement of End User Water Meters and Meter All Town Services...... 15 INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS NOT ADDRESSED BY THE TOWN ...... 15 Pressure Reducing Valves...... 15 OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 16 Tiered Water Rates, Revenue Support Of System ...... 16 Implement Computerized Record Keeping at the Water Treatment Plant ...... 16 Inspect and Clean/Repair Interior of the 1 MG Tank...... 16 Reduce the Maximum Storage Volumes Within the Tank and Increase the Range in Operational Levels ...... 16 Update or create an operation manual for the water system ...... 17 TASK 5 – HYDRAULIC MODEL AND GIS ...... 18 VERIFICATION AND CALIBRATION ...... 19 EXTENDED PERIOD SIMULATION FIRE FLOW SCENARIOS ...... 20 GIS UPDATE ...... 21 TASK 5a – SWING TIE ATTRIBUTION ...... 24 TASK 6 – EVALUATION OF SYSTEM OPERATIONS ...... 26 DEPLETIONS AND THE PLATTE RIVER RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM (PRRIP) .. 27 TASK 7 – CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS AND COST APPROXIMATIONS ...... 30 WWDC NON-ELIGIBLE PROJECT AREAS ...... 32 4th Street East (1) ...... 32 4th Street West (2) ...... 32 Front Street East (3) ...... 32 Front Street West (4) ...... 33 Old Town South (5) ...... 33 Old Town East (6) ...... 34 Old Town West (7) ...... 34 Old Town Distribution (8) ...... 34 South Third Street (12) ...... 35 South Tank Loop (18) ...... 35 East Avenue (25) ...... 35 Fifth Street Alley (26) ...... 36 Third Street Alley (27) ...... 36 First Street Alley (28) ...... 37 Rosebud Avenue Alley (29) ...... 37

7014.390/October 31, 2014 i Final Report WWDC ELIGIBLE PROJECT AREAS ...... 37 Old Town Transmission (9) ...... 37 South Jefferson (10) ...... 38 South West (11) ...... 38 West RR Crossing (13) ...... 39 South (14) ...... 39 South East (15) ...... 39 East (16) ...... 40 State Highway (17) ...... 40 North Tank Loop (19) ...... 40 Tank Look East (20) ...... 41 Tank (21) ...... 41 Tank Loop West (22) ...... 41 North Jefferson (23) ...... 42 West Elmo (24) ...... 42 TASK 8 – ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ...... 43 TASK 9 – IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRAINTS ...... 47 TASK 10 – INPUT FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS ...... 49 TASK 11 – SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES ...... 51 TASK 12 – LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS AND FINAL COST ESTIMATES ... 54 TASK 13 – WATER SYSTEM FINANCING ...... 58 EXISTING SYSTEM BUDGET AND FINANCING ...... 58 FUNDING SCENARIOS ...... 62 WATER SYSTEM FINANCING OPTIONS ...... 70 Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC)...... 70 Wyoming Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) ...... 71 Office of State Loans and Investments (OSLI) Mineral Royalty Grants ...... 71 Wyoming Business Council (WBC) ...... 73 United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development Program ...... 73 Private Lenders ...... 76 Specific Purpose Tax ...... 77 COMMENTS AND REQUIREMENTS ...... 77 Bibliography ...... 79

7014.390/October 31, 2014 ii Final Report LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 – As-Built Drawings ...... 10 Table 2 – Hydrant Pressure Testing ...... 20 Table 3 – Modeled Fire Flows ...... 21 Table 4 – Identification of Constraints for Hanna Water Main Project...... 48 Table 5 – Priority Project Schedule ...... 53 Table 6 – Town Priorities...... 56 Table 7 – Total Lifecycle Cost ...... 57 Table 8 – 2012-2014 Fiscal Year Budget ...... 59 Table 9 – Budget Alternative ...... 61 Table 10 – User Rates with NO Outside Funding Assistance ...... 64 Table 11 – User Rates with WWDC Funding with Grants and SLIB Loans ...... 65 Table 12 – Impact to User Rates with 100% RUS Loan Funding ...... 66 Table 13 – Impact to Rates with 100% SRF Funding ...... 67 Table 14 – Impact to User Rates with 100% RUS Grant and Loan Funding ...... 68 Table 15 – Impact to User Rates with 100% SLIB Funding with 75% Principal Forgiveness ...... 69 Table 16 – Funding Source Application Requirements ...... 78

TABLE OF FIGURES

Figure 1 – Water Transmission vs. Distribution ...... 6 Figure 2 – Hanna Water Model ...... 23 Figure 3 – Project Area Overview ...... 31 Figure 4 – Environmental Report Project Areas ...... 46

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Hanna Water Valve Swing Ties Appendix B Project Cost Approximations and Conceptual Design Drawings Appendix C Water Model Junction Table Appendix D Environmental Agency Response Letters

7014.390/October 31, 2014 iii Final Report INTRODUCTION

Hanna is located in Carbon County, approximately 40 miles northeast of the City of Rawlins. The Town’s population peaked in the early 1980s at approximately 2300 residents and now stands at 840, as of the 2010 census. The Town’s water system includes a water treatment plant built in 1980 along with a 20 million gallon open reservoir filled with surface water, collected from Rattlesnake Creek. The Town distribution system has a variety of water main sizes and pipe material, from steel and iron pipe installed in the 1920s to Asbestos Cement (AC), ductile iron (DIP) and Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) installed in the early 1980s1

This report is a Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) Level II Report that builds on the Master Plan Level I Study prepared by AVI Professional Corporation and submitted in September of 2012 (Master Plan). The Town is preparing to move forward with recommended projects from the Level I study. The Master Plan recommendations included additional meters and meter repairs, operational changes as well as transmission line and distribution main replacements.

In this report, general recommendations and projects from the Level I Master Plan are developed into specific projects with cost approximations and potential funding sources identified. The goal of this Level II study is to build on the Level I Study by developing recommended projects through prioritization, identification of funding sources, project constraints and preliminary project planning.

This Level II study also reviews water system operations and updates the Level I study with the most recent available information. In addition this study will update the existing Geographical Information System (GIS) with a valve shape file and swing tie attribute table. The Master Plan water model has been updated with revised demands, pressures and an extended time period simulation. Fire flows have also been modeled and verified in five different areas of the Town.

1 AVI Professional Corporation, Hanna Master Plan Level I Study, Final Report, September 2012

7014.390/October 31, 2014 1 Final Report Intent This study is anticipated to be used as a tool by the Town of Hanna to facilitate a comprehensive plan to address water transmission and distribution infrastructure repair and replacement. This study is intended as a complement to the 2012 Master Plan.

Goals The goals and objectives of this Level I study are: • Review and update population and water demand projections. • Identify priority project areas that address current needs and future replacement. • Develop conceptual plan sets that are project funding application ready.

Acknowledgements A study of this magnitude would not be possible without the contribution and cooperation of many competent professionals. In no particular order, we would like to thank the following for their contribution to and involvement with this project:

Chace Tavelli, Wyoming Water Development Commission Project Manager Tony Poulos, Town of Hanna Mayor Cody Braun, Hanna Town Council Wendy Faldowski, Hanna Town Council Bill Klemola, Hanna Town Council Linda Wagner, Hanna Town Council Larry Korkow, Public Works Director Pam Paulson, Hanna Treasurer Vivian Gonzales, Hanna Town Clerk Jack Heck, Water Treatment Plant Operator Matt Hoobler, Wyoming State Engineer’s Office North Plate River Coordinator

7014.390/October 31, 2014 2 Final Report TASK 1 – SCOPING AND PROJECT MEETINGS

Project meetings were held at several milestones during the project. An initial scoping meeting was held in Hanna on August 13, 2013 to familiarize the Town Council and staff with the project scope and schedule. Prior to scheduling the Scoping Meeting a conference was held with Chace Tavelli, WWDC Project Manager, to review the various areas of work and to define those parts and/or areas of the project that are not eligible for WWDC funding. Interested community members were also welcome to attend this initial scoping meeting, although no comments from the public were received.

Prior to the initial scoping meeting Task 2: Review of Existing Information was completed to allow a thorough review of historic materials and provide better preparation for the water system discussion. Maps and other visual aids were presented to clarify and identify project concerns. The primary purpose of the scoping meeting was to obtain input from the Town Council, water department operations personnel, and concerned citizens to set project goals. The following items were presented and discussed:

1. Project description 2. Review and update of master plan information 3. Prioritization and development of funding packages for priority water main replacements 4. Development of schedules for projects based upon priorities 5. Priority water mains identified on water system overview map (Figure 3) 6. Town’s top priorities a. Front Street (Main to Jefferson) b. Jefferson (South 3rd to Front Street) Under UPRR c. 4th Street d. Original 4” Mains in Original Town and Elmo 7. Determination of transmission lines vs distribution mains (See Figure 1) a. Transmission line: A water main whose primary function is to deliver all water from a source end to a discharge end. Transmission lines generally have few individual service taps and will carry the majority of the flow during times of high use and fire flows. b. Distribution main: A water main whose primary function is to deliver water to individual users. Distribution mains typically have the majority of the service taps and low flow rates unless a fire flow is directly taken from the main itself. 8. Existing information/data collection (population, water use, financial) 9. Water usage data and financial data for 2012 which has been received 10. Review of 2012 data and comparison with Master Plan

7014.390/October 31, 2014 3 Final Report 11. Update of Master Plan if necessary 12. Inventory and evaluation of the existing system a. Public Works preparation of a water valve map. b. Review valve information and see if Priority Mains can be Isolated 13. Conceptual designs and cost estimates a. Designs based on Sponsor input b. Development of project size based on funding packaging c. Individual projects broken down to identify funding eligibility for the various funding programs. WWDC only funds Transmission Lines and appurtenances associated with the line2. Distribution Mains as well as the service lines are not eligible components of a project area. d. Determination of priorities and sequencing e. Utilization of record drawings to develop preliminary plans f. Development of cost approximations for each project area 14. Identification of project constraints a. Funding constraints b. Legal constraints c. Site and soils conditions

A second project meeting was held on June 30, 2014 in Hanna. The second project meeting was a combined meeting to present growth and demand projections and conceptual project designs. The following items were presented and discussed:

Introductions • Chace Tavelli, WWDC Project Manager • Ken Schwerdt, PMPC Project Manager • Karl Smith, PMPC Project Engineer

Level II Study Description • Review and Update 2012 Master Plan Information • Identify and prioritize project areas • Develop funding scenarios and schedules for projects based upon priorities

Task #3 - Population Growth and Water Demand Projections • We have reviewed the 2012 Master Plan and believe that the conclusions presented then are still valid. • While Hanna may see some growth due to upcoming energy related projects, the system is sized to handle the population increase.

2 Wyoming Water Development Commission Legislative Water Committee, Operating Criteria of the Wyoming Water Development Program, November 3, 2011

7014.390/October 31, 2014 4 Final Report • The Medicine Bow Fuel & Power Project (DKRW) could result in significant increases in population and water demand. The DKRW project appears to have a low probability of moving forward at this time. • Additional comments from the Town included agreement with the growth and demand projections and reference to an existing trailer park that is permitted for 300 trailers. However to restore service to the trailer park, the existing infrastructure would require complete replacement.

Task #7 - Conceptual Designs and Cost Estimates • Method of Prioritization • Town’s Top Priorities th o 4 Street o Original 4” Mains in Original Town and Elmo o Front Street (Main to Jefferson) Original 4” Mains in Original Town and Elmo o rd o Jefferson (South 3 to Front Street) Under UPRR • Project size o Method for project sizing o Cost Approximation • Project classification o Distribution o Transmission • Restoration expectations o Street surfacing • Additional comments from the Town included agreement with the cost estimations and the apparent discrepancy with the Master Plan cost estimations. The Town is also concerned about the impact of street surfacing on the total cost of projects and restoring roads to original or better condition. The Town also has $67,000 in funding available for street repair on Jefferson.

Upon completion of the report, a public meeting will be held to present the findings of the report. All pertinent data will be presented at the meeting and a memorandum summarizing the views and comments presented at the meeting will be prepared.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 5 Final Report

TASK 2 – REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION

To achieve a historical perspective and understanding for the current water system, PMPC gathered and reviewed available information related to the Town’s water supply, transmission and distribution. This review was completed prior to the initial scoping meeting held in August, 2013 to identify the project areas for discussion.

The Master Plan was utilized extensively and information from the Master Plan was used to focus project resources on previously identified areas of concern. The Town Clerk and Public Works Director were interviewed to determine if any changes have occurred since completion of the Master Plan. Water production and water usage information was collected and reviewed to determine if any significant changes have occurred since completion of the Master Plan.

The following 2012 Master Plan recommendations were reviewed and updated:

1. System Operation: a. Complete leak detection program: Before a leak detection program can be contracted, missing components of the system must be located and exposed. A GIS map with a swing tie table to locate 286 valves has been prepared and presented in Task 5a. Of the 286 valves in the table, 24 were not located in the field, although the swing tie landmarks were located. Another eight valves were not located due to ambiguous locations in the middle of a field too far from any landmarks to measure. b. Initiate computerized record keeping: Computerized record keeping has been implemented. c. Inspect, clean and repair 1 MG Tank: This recommendation was completed in 2013. d. Reduce the maximum storage volumes within the tank and increase the range in operational levels within the storage tank in order to promote water circulation and mixing: Current operational policy is to keep the tank as full as possible at all times, with minimal fluctuation during the week. On weekends the tank level is allowed to fluctuate depending on demand. e. Develop and regularly update an operations manual for the water system: Not implemented.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 7 Final Report 2. System Infrastructure: a. Replace line valves and hydrants: A valve and hydrant replacement program is presented in this report. b. Priority of the 4" water mains in the old part of town: The 4” water mains are identified for priority replacement in this report. No active leaks reported at this time. c. Priority of poorly functioning valves and hydrants: A valve and replacement program in conjunction with priority main replacement areas is presented in this report. d. Replace end user meters and install meters on unmetered taps at Town buildings and parks: End user meter replacements and installations are ongoing to all facilities the Town services. e. Remove the existing Pressure Release Valve (PRV) which restricts flows from the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) to the storage tank: The existing PRV been reviewed, operation has been improved and additional recommendations are presented in Task 4. f. Replace 2" and 3" lines with 6" lines in Elmo: Some of the small diameter mains in Elmo are addressed in the Priority areas included in this report.

3. Water Treatment Plant: a. Better sealing on top of the clearwell: No change since the 2012 Master Plan. b. Improved clearwell hatches: No change since the 2012 Master Plan. c. Secure barriers to prevent contaminants: No change since the 2012 Master Plan. d. Computer for record keeping: Computerized record keeping has been implemented.

4. Improvements to Overall System: a. Integration of the new Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system into existing system: SCADA system has been installed; additional work is being pursued to optimize the system. b. and distribution system downstream of the WTP: Priority areas for replacement have been identified and are included in this report. c. Operation and infrastructure at the WTP and 1 MG Treated Water Storage Tank: No change since the 2012 Master Plan. d. Purchase Rattlesnake Creek/Pass Creek water rights: No change since the 2012 Master Plan. e. Purchase Little Snake Exchange Water: No change since the 2012 Master Plan.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 8 Final Report Supplemental Information Collected and Reviewed

PMPC has extensive files and as-built plans for the Town’s water system that were reviewed for information to produce the swing tie tables and conceptual design detail, such as water main sizing; and material and miscellaneous information, such as steel casing locations and underground conditions. The as-built information was used to create the conceptual designs and improve the accuracy of the cost approximations. The as-built drawings are indexed and keyed to a master map of the Town for locating project areas easily. The drawings reviewed are presented in Table 1.

In addition to the above listed drawings the following information was collected from Town personnel and records.

1. Financial Reports a. Meter Proof Reports 1/31/12 thru 6/30/13 Provided by the Town Clerk 2. Water Treatment Plant Records a. 2012 Water Production from the WTP Operator dated July 26th, 2013 3. WWDC Reports and Studies a. Master Plan Level I Study for the Town of Hanna September 2012 b. City of Hanna Waterline Replacement Environmental Review November 2012 4. Town of Hanna Staff Interviews a. Prioritize project areas b. Production records c. System operation 5. Town of Hanna Records a. Resolution 2013 – 426 Amending Revenue and Expenditures b. Ordinance No. 357 appropriating Money for the Annual Budget 2013- 2014 c. Ordinance No. 355 Amending Water Consumption Rates d. Town of Hanna Balance Sheet June 30th, 2013 (End of Fiscal Year 2013) 6. Wyoming Water Development Commission Consultation a. New project financing b. Transmission line definitions

7014.390/October 31, 2014 9 Final Report Table 1 – As-Built Drawings

Title Engineer Date Title Engineer Date 1971 Water and Johnson Fermelia 2/22/1971 Elmo connection and Robert Jack 3/11/1980 Sewer and Crank 1980 Loop Line Smith & Assoc. Sewer Johnson Fermelia 1975 Water Line Replacement Robert Jack 4/22/1981 Improvements and Crank - West Line Smith & Assoc. Elmo Water and Johnson Fermelia 10/7/1975 1.0 MGD Water Robert Jack 7/7/1981 Sewer Systems and Crank Treatment Plant Smith & Assoc. Water Storage Johnson Fermelia 10/9/1975 South Interceptor Sewer Robert Jack 10/19/1981 Tank and Crank Smith & Assoc. Interceptor Sewer Robert Jack 8/31/1976 Schematic Plan - Water Robert Jack 5/4/1982 System Smith & Assoc. Main Replacement Smith & Assoc. Hedgpeth Tract Robert Jack 5/2/1977 Sewer Improvements for Robert Jack 6/21/1982 Sewer Line Smith & Assoc. North and South Smith & Assoc. Tipperary Streets Hanna Water Line Robert Jack 6/14/1977 Hanna Recreation Center Banner Aug-82 Smith & Assoc. Sanitary Sewer Main Associates Interim Sewage Robert Jack 8/19/1977 Rattlesnake Pipeline Black and 11/14/1985 Treatment Smith & Assoc. Replacement Veatch Facilities Rattlesnake Creek Robert Jack 11/9/1977 Elmo Interceptor Sewer PMPC 7/11/1986 Water Smith & Assoc. Transmission Line Jones Addition Robert Jack 8/4/1978 1987 Lagoon PMPC 10/27/1987 Smith & Assoc. Improvement Hanna Water Tank Robert Jack 8/16/1978 1989 Waterline PMPC 9/11/1989 Replacement Smith & Replacement Project Associates Prairie Hills Robert Jack 9/7/1978 1991 Waterline PMPC 4/23/1991 Smith & Assoc. Replacement Project Hanna Water Robert Jack 9/19/1978 Rosebud Paving Project PMPC Jun-91 Distribution Smith & System Associates Improvements Water and Sewer Robert Jack 5/16/1979 Mountain View Addition Robert Jack 7/10/1991 Extension - Hanna Smith & Assoc. Smith & Assoc. High School Water and Sewer Robert Jack 7/30/1979 1992 Waterline PMPC 3/6/1992 Extension - Church Smith & Assoc. Replacement Project Tract Medallion Cove Robert Jack 9/28/1979 Utility Index Map PMPC 10/26/1993 Subdivision Smith & Assoc. Hanna Trailer Park Robert Jack 10/8/1979 Sewer Index Map PMPC 10/26/1993 Smith & Assoc. Hanna Street Robert Jack 1/26/1980 Rattlesnake PMPC 10/7/1999 Improvements Smith & Assoc. Transmission Pipeline Replacement Elmo connection Robert Jack 3/11/1980 Interceptor Drain CTL Thompson and 1980 Loop Smith & Assoc. Alignment and Line Easements

7014.390/October 31, 2014 10 Final Report TASK 3 – POPULATION GROWTH AND WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS

Population growth has been flat to negative and local industrial development is still in the feasibility and planning stages. The following large scale development projects have industrial siting plans on file with the State of Wyoming:

1. DKRW LLC (DKRW) - Coal to Liquid – 2300 additional employees during the construction phase and 450 full-time permanent employees for the remaining operational life of the project. The current term of their agreement with the state is to begin construction within 30 months of (June, 2016) or DKRW will lose their permit. Construction is on hold for financing with little indication of project start.

2. Power Company of Wyoming (PCW) – Wind farm development expected to bring additional construction workers into Carbon County. Project is moving forward in the review process. Hanna could see some impact from PCW development as neighboring towns reach capacity and employees look to Hanna for accommodations. This would likely result in now vacant homes being filled. At this time, peak demand for PWC workers is projected for the second and third quarters of 2017.

3. Gateway West/Trans West Transmission Lines – Electric transmission line project tied to the PWC wind farm project. See above comment regarding PCW.

The projects listed above have the potential to increase population in Carbon County by 1000 to 6000 construction employees annually and as the available inventory of rental homes decreases in neighboring towns, some of these additional employees could be looking for lodging to Hanna.

The recommendations of the Master Plan are still pertinent to the current growth and demand projections. The Hanna water system has supported approximately 2,100 people in the past so there could be a substantial increase in current population without requiring additional system capacity. Based on the available data; population growth will not adversely impact overall water demand in the foreseeable future. With minor repairs and improvements the water system can support additional population. Depletions issues are addressed in Task #6.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 11 Final Report TASK 4 – INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM

The Hanna water system has supported approximately 2,100 people in the past so there could be a substantial increase in current population without requiring additional system capacity. With the exception of the top five priority areas identified in Task 7, the Hanna Water system infrastructure has no known issues requiring immediate repair or replacement. In addition to addressing the Master Plan comments below, we have identified system components in Task #7 and provided a priority schedule for replacement within the next 20 years in Task #11.

The raw water reservoir, WTP and existing one million gallon storage tank are acceptable for the current and projected demand. There are no pump stations in the system. The PRV station maintains pressure throughout the Town. There are no identified bottlenecks in the supply or distribution system that prevents the Town from supplying water to customers. 2012 MASTER PLAN AND ALTERNATIVES Alternatives from the 2012 Master Plan have been presented in bold italics. The Master Plan alternatives have been updated with the most current information below.

Replace All Cast Iron Pipes with PVC.

The Master Plan recommends all 4” cast iron pipe (CIP) in the area of Town roughly bounded by Front Street on the south, Harrison to the east, Columbia on the west, then north to the limits of the system should be scheduled for upgrade. This alternative has been divided into seven separate priority project areas scheduled for funding and completion.

The Master Plan has identified that DIP and PVC sized below 6” in Elmo should also be replaced with 6” PVC. This alternative has been divided into six separate priority project areas scheduled for funding and completion.

In addition to the aging DIP, there are also water mains in Hanna built with other problematic material, such as cast iron pipe (CIP) and asbestos cement (AC) that have been identified and prioritized for replacement.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 12 Final Report Replace Water line from the School Monument to Front Street, and Clark St. to Jefferson.

Replacement of the water line from the School Monument to Front Street. However, the report recommends also replacing the line north on Madison to Third Street, Madison to Main, and Main back to Front Street. The Clark to Main section was not included, but could easily be added to a funding request. This alternative has been divided into six separate priority project areas scheduled for funding and completion. Line into Recreation Center from Feldspar to Recreation Center.

The 300 linear feet of line needed to address this priority is not shown on the Master Plan map in Section 3. However, it is included in the total linear feet of 6” PVC line in the Master Plan recommendations and cost estimates. The Rec Center domestic service line has been successfully replaced by Town staff with 2 inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) line along the same alignment. Replace Undersized Lines in Elmo.

All lines in Elmo, smaller than 6”, should be replaced with 6” PVC, specifically the 2” line from No Name Street to East Avenue between 2nd Street and 3rd Street and the 4” line from No Name Street to Rosebud between 3rd Street and 4th Street. This alternative has been divided into four separate priority project areas scheduled for funding and completion. New Connection to Elmo

The Master Plan also recommends a new line from No Name Street to Feldspar Court. Installation of this line will be expensive and is not a high priority in the report given the other needs of the Town; this line would provide a redundant transmission line to Elmo area and improve circulation through Elmo’s distribution lines. Increasing the size of lines will also enhance fire flows, as would the redundant transmission line. This alternative has been identified as a priority project area and scheduled for funding and completion.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 13 Final Report Replacement of Gate Valves

Included in the Master Plan are cost estimates for installing 6” and 8” gate valves as transmission and distribution lines of corresponding size are replaced. The industry standard is a gate valve for every 800 feet of transmission or distribution line. The number of valves recommended in the report intentionally includes additional valves above the standard to accommodate needs identified during system design and the configuration of distribution system. The Town is fortunate to have $18,579.00 in funding available through the Consensus Block Grant (CBG) for component replacement. When the Town determines the schedule and scope of system upgrades to be implemented, the $18,759.00 can be deducted from the amount to be budgeted. However, some funding agencies may not allow CBG funding to be counted as the Town’s required match. The valve exercising program was approached in two ways; priority areas for exercising valves are distinguished by not being scheduled for full replacement projects in the next five years and a tentative cost approximation for five valve replacements and one fire hydrant replacement has been developed. The plan is to include replacement costs in the Town’s annual budget, and methodically exercise valves in the identified project areas until five valves and a fire hydrant have been identified for replacement. After all the valves and hydrants in a project area are on a regular exercising program, operations staff could move on to the next project area.

Replacement of Hydrants

The cost of replacing existing hydrants when lines are installed is included in the report and recommendations. Standardizing the brand and model of replacement hydrants will simplify parts inventory and maintenance. Cost estimates for hydrants are based on replacing existing units as lines are installed. The report assumes existing hydrant locations provide adequate coverage. Such information is usually available in the Insurance Service Office (ISO) evaluation of community fire protection capabilities. However, it was not possible to locate a copy of the report for Hanna and a request for the report from the ISO received no response. For the response to this recommendation, see comment above.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 14 Final Report Replacement of End User Water Meters and Meter All Town Services

As noted in the report, many of the Town’s 20-year old Sensus meters are not functioning or provide questionable readings. Replacement of meters and metering of all currently unmetered use (Town building and parks or other irrigation) is the second priority recommendation in the report. As noted, an accurate accounting of use is important for several reasons. Users will pay for water actually used. Water conservation will be encouraged and WTP operational costs reduced, especially if the recommended rate increases and tiered rate structure is implemented. An accurate accounting of all metered use, including the currently unmetered facilities, will provide useful information for management of the WTP, the storage tank, and the distribution system. When total metered use is known, water loss in the system can be determined and remedial measures implemented if necessary. The Town has reported that the majority of water meters in the Town are functioning properly and reliably reading. The installation of meters, in Town owned buildings, is an ongoing project.

INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS NOT ADDRESSED BY THE TOWN

Pressure Reducing Valves.

As noted above, the existing PRV reduces line pressure by about 10 psi, thus restricting pressures in portions of the distribution system. While the existing unit does provide some protection against excessive pressure that can cause leaks or line breaks, it complicates operation of the WTP by triggering an automatic shutoff on short notice as the tank nears capacity and water backs up in the clearwells. During the investigation of the existing PRVs, it was discovered that the 8” PRV was working erratically due to a hole in the diaphragm. The diaphragm was replaced and the PRV performance issue has been resolved. However there appears to be an unresolved air issue in the system.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 15 Final Report OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Tiered Water Rates, Revenue Support Of System

Operation and maintenance of the water system is currently subsidized by revenues from the Carbon County Special Purpose Tax and the CBG. The base rate should support all system operational costs, plus creation of emergency and replacement enterprise funds. A base rate of $55.00 is recommended along with a tiered rate system that increases the cost per 1000 gallons as use increases. A new rate ordinance was the highest operational priority recommended in the Master Plan. The Town of Hanna raised the water utility rates in May of 2013. The base rate was not changed but the base gallons amount was reduced. There is not enough data available for review to determine if the rate change has impacted revenue for the Town.

Implement Computerized Record Keeping at the Water Treatment Plant

This recommendation may be achieved when the SCADA system is operational and functioning as designed. According to the water department, computerized record keeping is now standard at the treatment plant.

Inspect and Clean/Repair Interior of the 1 MG Tank

The Town reported that the interior of the tank was recently inspected and found to be in acceptable condition. A copy of the report was not available for review. This routine maintenance should be scheduled within the next five years. Liner repair or replacement will protect the integrity of the steel tank walls. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends treated water storage should be inspected, cleaned, and disinfected every three years. According to the water department, the water tank has been dive cleaned and inspected in 2013. A video of the dive is available at the water department.

Reduce the Maximum Storage Volumes Within the Tank and Increase the Range in Operational Levels

This recommendation addresses potential “water age” quality problems in the tank. However, system operators are reluctant to fluctuate tank levels, preferring to keep the tank in the 75-95% capacity range. The water department continues to operate the tank at high levels.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 16 Final Report Update or create an operation manual for the water system

Changes in Town staff often result in the loss of institutional knowledge. An operation manual need not be complex. The Public Works Superintendent currently keeps computer and hand-written records as does the WTP Operator.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 17 Final Report TASK 5 – HYDRAULIC MODEL AND GIS

The hydraulic model developed for the 2012 Master Plan was reviewed and updated with the most recent year of water production records provided by the Town and calibrated by hydrant flow testing. Extended period simulations and fire flow scenarios were also developed to assess the water system’s ability to service the Town. In addition, a proposed looping water main to Elmo was modeled for impacts to fire flow and water system function.

During review of the model it was discovered that there were a number of demand loads inconsistent with the existing layout of the Town. These loads were identified and removed. In addition, the water model also used a baseline demand of 767 gpm. There was no narrative basis in the 2012 Master Plan for the 767 gpm baseline demand or how demand loads were distributed in the model.

The nominal demand load used in this report was derived from the average daily demand. Average daily demand was estimated from the metered water production records provided by the treatment plant operator. Water production was graphed from records provided and the average of the non-irrigation months resulted in an average monthly baseline demand of 4,300,000 gallons per month. The assumption is that demands in the Town of Hanna consist of residential demands and little to no industrial or commercial demands. Residential demand typically occurs approximately 12 hours per day. Based on these assumptions the baseline daily demand for the aforementioned 12 hours per day is 195 gpm.

In addition to modifying the demands loads across the model a number of new elements were incorporated to improve the model. The model is updated with Pressure Reducing Valves (PRVs), changes to flow coefficients (Cv), pipe sizing, and abandoned pipes removed.

The clear well, at the water treatment plant was modeled with two tanks, so the model could properly simulate that two separate pipes supply the Town system. The tank elevations are set to the observed water treatment plant clearwell elevation.

Two PRV’s (an 8” and a 4”) were added downstream of the WTP, operating at pressures of 50 and 45 psi, respectively. On an average day the 8” PRV remains closed and water flows only through the 4” PRV to provide water to the town.

There were numerous pipe size and material changes required throughout the model, along with the insertion of missing mains, including a 20” line following the clear water reservoir. Water mains were added to the elementary school, recreational center and south of the Jones Addition.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 18 Final Report Pipe materials and Hazen-Williams coefficients were updated throughout the entire model. In the Master Plan model, all of the pipes were modeled as cast iron with a Cv of 130. The Town’s existing system is comprised of a number of different materials such as ductile iron, PVC and Asbestos Cement. There is an altitude valve, in the one million gallon storage tank that was modeled with a short six inch diameter section of pipe. WaterCAD automatically programs its tanks to include altitude valves but the pipe was added and given a minor loss coefficient to properly simulate the minor losses in the globe valve mechanism of the altitude valve. All abandoned and short dead ends were also removed from the model to clean up the presentation.

VERIFICATION AND CALIBRATION

To verify and calibrate the model, flow testing was performed on five fire hydrants in Hanna. The flow and pressure testing was conducted on May 27, 2014 with the assistance of Town personnel. The hydrant locations were selected to be representative of five distinct areas in the Town; Elmo, Jones Addition, Old Town, Mountain View Addition, and Medallion Cove Subdivision.

The flow testing consisted of attaching a diffuser with a pitot to a hydrant in the study neighborhood and a pressure gauge to the nearest available second hydrant. The subject hydrant was flow tested and flows calculated from the observed pressures. The measured flows were compared to the modeled data and the model is modified to match observed flows. Table 2 presents the results of the hydrant flow testing.

Flow testing validated the model over most of the Town. However, in Elmo the observed flows were inconsistent with the modeled flows. The observed flows were 50% greater than the modeled flows. Continued investigation did not identify any reason for the conservative fire flows predicted by the model.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 19 Final Report Table 2 – Hydrant Pressure Testing

HYDRANT PRESSURE TESTING

PRESSURE FLOW PITOT TES FLOW gpm @ T DATE TIME JUNCTION STATIC RESIDUAL 1 2 3 gpm 20psi 3 3 3 1 5/28/2014 9:15 AM J-121 85 44 5 5 5 3 3 3 5/28/2014 9:16 AM 85 44 5 5 5 1516 1945 4 4 4 2 5/28/2014 9:30 AM J-90 102 86 0 0 0 4 4 4 5/28/2014 9:32 AM 102 86 0 0 0 1621 3918 4 4 4 3 5/28/2014 9:50 AM J-155 115 104 0 0 0 3 3 3 5/28/2014 9:52 AM 115 104 0 0 0 1404 4497 3 3 3 4 5/28/2014 10:20 AM J-25 98 90 0 0 0 3 3 3 5/28/2014 10:22 AM 98 90 0 0 0 1404 4802 4 4 4 5 5/28/2014 10:40 AM J-68 80 63 0 0 0 4 4 4 5/28/2014 10:46 AM 80 63 0 0 0 1621 3203

EXTENDED PERIOD SIMULATION FIRE FLOW SCENARIOS

Extended period simulations attempt to model the system over time as water demand fluctuates throughout the day. For example, residential water use on a typical weekday is higher than average in the morning before people go to work, and is usually highest in the evening when residents are preparing dinner, washing clothes, etc. This variation in demand over time can be modeled using hourly demand patterns. Demand patterns are multipliers that vary with time and are applied to a given base demand, most typically the average daily demand. Extended period simulations strengthen the models ability to predict the impact of large demands, such as fire flows, on the water system.

Fire flows are modeled as a 3 hour demand; a conservative number based on ISO (Insurance Service Office) and NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) recommendations for single family wood frame structures. The fire flow demand was applied at five different locations throughout the Town. The 3 hour period was put into effect at 17:00-20:00 which would be at the time of peak water demand throughout the town (dinner, laundry, etc.). This time period represents an upper limit or worst case scenario for the Town water system. Table 3 lists the modeled fire flow results at five locations in Hanna.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 20 Final Report Table 3 – Modeled Fire Flows

TOWN OF HANNA - MODELED FIRE FLOWS Fire Flow Residual Pressure Time Duration Demand (GPM) Location (PSI) J-121 Northeast 5-8PM 3 hrs 800 49.8 corner of Elmo J-90 Jones 5-8PM 3 hrs 1200 98.6 Addition J-156 Old Town 5-8PM 3 hrs 1200 110.1 J-68 Mountain 5-8PM 3 hrs 1200 59.2 View Addition J-25 Medallion 5-8PM 3 hrs 1200 71.9 Cove

From the above table, fire flows in all five locations can be sustained without reducing system pressures below 20 psi. The Hanna Water Model, Figure 2, shows the locations of the tested fire hydrants.

GIS UPDATE

The GIS provided with the 2012 Master Plan was reviewed and updated with a valve shape file and swing tie attributes. Valve locations, along with many other components of the water system, were digitally mapped with the use of ArcGIS. A unique shapefile was created for the water valves. This was overlain with other shapefiles which contained locations of water mains, fire hydrants, parcels, etc. The valve locations were approximated from the information given on the swing tie attribute table. Street intersections, valve size, and field measurements were all utilized for placing the valve as correctly as possible. When locations were still in question, aerial imagery was used in an attempt to locate the valve. All valves were placed on the map with best information available.

A number of issues with the GIS provided became apparent during the update process. First, the water main GIS shapefile provided contained a conflicting coordinate system with that of the parcel shapefile, resulting in an offset between the two shapefiles. The offset is no more than a few feet in most locations, yet that is enough to cause the water mains to appear within private parcels rather than in the roadway. Valves were placed on water mains even though the locations conflict with parcel data. Second, a number of the descriptions from the record drawing swing ties were vague or difficult to interpret. Valves were placed as accurately as possible with the best information available. Third, on occasion, the valve size from the attribute table did not correspond with what was shown on the water main shapefile.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 21 Final Report The final step of the update process was to join the swing tie table with the valve locations on the GIS file. The final product gives a visual representation of the valve location in GIS along with the following corresponding attributes for each valve: ID, Street1, Street2, Valve Size, Location, Field Measurement1, Field Measurement2, and Notes.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 22 Final Report

TASK 5A – SWING TIE ATTRIBUTION

A swing tie is a method of locating equipment based on horizontal measurements to fixed landmarks such as fire hydrants and power poles. Swing tie measurements are usually made during the final phases of a construction project. A swing tie table, for the valves in Hanna was created and linked to the GIS. Existing maps were cross- referenced to determine the location and size of pipe for the existing valves. From the information gathered from the maps, a swing tie table was constructed to identify all of the existing valves. Once completed, a field analysis was conducted to verify that the valves and the landmarks utilized for the swing tie information were still present.

Existing maps of the water systems in place in Hanna and Elmo were gathered to begin the process of finding and categorizing all of the water valves in the area. Two maps were analyzed; one from PMPC and one from the Town of Hanna, to cross check the number of valves as well as the valve location and what size pipes were associated with each valve. The maps included “Elmo Connection 1980 Loop Lines,” as well as a map, provided by the Town of Hanna, of the water system.

Each of the maps contained valve location and swing tie measurements. The swing ties provided the valve locations in relation to landmarks in the area, such as power poles and fire hydrants. From the information in the maps, a swing tie table was constructed to identify each of the valves. The table applies a unique identifier to each valve. In addition to the swing tie information, the table contains cross streets, pipe size, and a brief description for each of the valves.

As part of the swing tie task, a valve naming convention was developed that can be used throughout the entire system. The naming convention uses the first letters of the intersecting streets with a direction designation to identify where a particular valve is located in reference to the other valves in that intersection.

For instance if there are two valve in the intersection of 3rd Street and Jefferson Street the naming would look like 3J-1N where the N designates this valve is North of the other valve so the second valve would be named 3J-2W with this valve being west of the first valve. This naming convention would has been used to tabulate existing valves and can be continued as valves are added to the system.

After the table was constructed, field verification was completed to ensure that the valves and landmarks identified from the maps still existed. If the landmarks had been removed, but the valve was present, new swing ties were measured from new landmarks to the valve.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 24 Final Report The use of swing ties as a location method is not exact. It gives the ability to roughly locate the valves. In the construction of the swing tie table, certain valve entries are highlighted in either yellow or red. In the field verification process, it was discovered that platted subdivisions have not yet been developed. Valves highlighted in yellow signify valves that are to be located in the undeveloped subdivisions or other undeveloped areas of the two towns. The yellow highlight assumes that the valves are present, as construction of the entryways to the subdivisions has been completed to the point of the valve location, but the valves could not be found. Another reason for the yellow highlighting is that both of the swing tie landmarks were present at the site but the valve could not be located. Valves highlighted in red signify that the valves could not be located. This could be due to the fact that the location of the valve is in a field far from landmarks, all of the swing tie landmarks have been removed from the location, or did not have any swing tie information associated with them to begin with. The complete swing tie table is shown in Appendix A.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 25 Final Report TASK 6 – EVALUATION OF SYSTEM OPERATIONS

The operation of the system has not significantly changed since the 2012 Master Plan. The two notable improvements to the system are the installation of the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system proposed in the Master Plan and repairing the existing pressure reducing valve system.

The SCADA system was installed and is currently operational. At this time it is primarily used for observing the functions of the water treatment plant, and only controls the ferric chloride process. The Town is considering expansion of the SCADA system to obtain additional system data and is reviewing recommendations for programming improvements to optimize utilization of the system and the efficiency of the plant.

Pressure reducing valves operate intermittently. Installation of air release valves have improved but did not solve operating issues related to air in the system. Air is introduced into the system when clear well levels drop to the outlet pipe elevation and water continues to drop in the transmission line. Air becomes trapped in the transmission line when water levels rise in the water treatment plant clear well. In addition, air release vacuum relief valves on the transmission lines from WTP to Town are not functioning and do not release accumulated air from system.

The following recommendations could address the water system air problems: replace air release and vacuum relief valves, install equipment in a manhole to permit servicing, add solenoid operators on PRVs in valve flow meters and line generator with storage batteries, connect added components to SCADA for monitoring and control. Maintain hydraulic operation as backup.

Increasing the operating level range in the storage tank is beneficial to the water quality of the system. At this time no operational changes address storage tank levels. Allowing the tank levels to operate in a greater range would improve water quality by reducing water age, encouraging mixing and reducing ice buildup in the winter months.

Much of the distribution system has lacked regular maintenance in the past, and the current operators are reluctant to exercise most valves due to the high potential of failure associated with old unmaintained equipment.

Project area specific recommendations for valve and hydrant exercising are based on the reported condition of the infrastructure and its priority according to this report. The project area specific valve exercising details are provided in Task 7.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 26 Final Report To accommodate the recommendations, the Town should implement an annual budget item in anticipation of replacing five valves annually. The cost for valve repairs could be substantial, and depending on the severity of the valves failure, could be incorporated into a planned infrastructure replacement project. An inoperable valve could be incorporated in to a future project, but a leaking valve should be repaired expediently.

DEPLETIONS AND THE PLATTE RIVER RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM (PRRIP)

The Town of Hanna is located in the North Platte River drainage, its water supply is from Rattlesnake Creek on the North end of the Elk Mountain. The regulations associated with the North Platte River, such as the PRRIP influence how Hanna accesses Platte River water for municipal use.

In 1997, Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska and the Department of Interior formed a unique partnership with the goal of sharing responsibilities for addressing endangered species issues within the Platte River Basin. Water users from the three states as well as local and national conservation groups joined the effort.

The PRRIP was implemented to recover habitat for four threatened and endangered species in the Central Platte River basin in Nebraska. Jeopardy biological opinions, by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service beginning in the 1970’s, were rendered for virtually all water projects (existing and new water related activities) that would deplete flows in the Platte River Basin. The barrage of jeopardy opinions, along with the cost of mitigation, served as the catalyst for creating the PRRIP.

The PRRIP provides a “reasonable and prudent alternative” for addressing the jeopardy condition of the target species by creating or restoring habitat in the Central Platte River, Nebraska. Measures undertaken by the PRRIP provide Endangered Species Act (ESA) protection for all existing water related activities, which allow them to operate as they have historically. Historical municipal depletions were based upon the maximum Platte River Basin water use in a five year period, ranging from 1992 through 1996, for each North Platte River municipality in Wyoming. However, depending on circumstances, the State of Wyoming may incur water replacement obligations if these historical maximum municipal depletions are exceeded and if the municipal under-runs are not sufficient to offset over-runs to the depletion baseline. Therefore, it is important for the State to work closely with each municipality to encourage or change operations that either prevent or delay triggering such replacement obligations.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 27 Final Report On January 1, 2007, the State of Wyoming entered into the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP) with the U.S. Department of the Interior, the State of Colorado, the State of Nebraska, representatives from environmental interests and water users’ interests throughout the Platte River Basin. The purpose of the PRRIP is to provide ESA coverage for water uses that existed on or before July 1, 1997. The PRRIP also provides a means for the development of Wyoming’s water in the Platte River basin while maintaining compliance under the ESA. The State of Wyoming developed a Wyoming Depletion Plan to allow new uses to occur in the North Platte River basin in Wyoming without adversely impacting the targeted endangered Platte River Basin species. This depletion plan is referenced in the PRRIP “Program Documents.”

In the Wyoming Depletions Plan municipal water use is measured against a depletion baseline that consists of the highest annual water use (depletions) that occurred during the irrigation season and non-irrigation season from 1992 through 1996. Under the PRRIP, Wyoming must measure and compare current annual depletions against the allowable annual depletion thresholds that were quantified for each municipality during this 1992-1996 period. Annual depletions for the Town of Hanna were established at 256 acre feet in the irrigation season, from May 1 through September 31, and 169 acre feet during the non-irrigation season, October 1 through April 31.

The Town provides a completed “Platte River Depletion Report-Municipal Water Use” form annually to the State Engineer’s Office (SEO) office. Town water use is itemized under the following headings:

• Surface Water Diversions into Primary Treatment • Ground Water Deliveries into Primary Treatment • Surface Water Diversions into Raw Water Irrigation • Groundwater Diversions into Raw Water Irrigation • Measured Effluent through Waste Water Treatment Facilities • Surface Water Sales, Ground Water Sales • Waste Water Effluent Treated from Water Sales • Waste Water Effluent Treated from Non-Municipal Water Supplies and other diversions.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 28 Final Report Since PRRIP implementation in 2007, water accounting has been undertaken by the SEO and is based on reports that are provided by the Town. The accumulated data, for the Upper Platte Basin, has shown the municipal use is either meeting or under allowable municipal depletions thresholds and agricultural use is regularly under the allotted irrigation depletion amounts. These under-runs are expected to continue into the foreseeable future. In the event of the Town exceeding their depletions thresholds, the State Engineer will put them on notice.

Once notice has been provided that depletions have been exceeded, the Town will provide the SEO with a plan to meet the benchmark in the next water year. The Town’s plan to reduce depletions could include conservation measures or purchase agreements. Hanna is currently under depletion amounts with the 2013 report showing 168 acre feet during the irrigation season, and 107 acre feet during the non-irrigation season. .

7014.390/October 31, 2014 29 Final Report TASK 7 – CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS AND COST APPROXIMATIONS

Conceptual level designs and cost estimates have been developed for the project areas identified by the Sponsor, WWDC Project Manager and extensive review of existing information and record documents. The cost estimates are the engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost and are made on the basis of experience and qualifications.

Probable construction costs were prepared using the standard of care customarily exercised by experienced and qualified consulting engineers generally familiar with municipal water systems. The following general procedure was used in preparing the probable construction costs:

• Determine quantities of materials and major system components from the conceptual design drawings. • Contact material suppliers and equipment venders to obtain current pricing. • Review recent bid tabulations from similar projects. • Prepare 2014 probable project opinion of cost. • Include contingency fees at 20% of the construction cost estimate. (Values may change during application and recommendation period.) • Include engineering fees at 20% of the total construction costs including design and construction engineering, survey, permitting, easements and legal fees. (Values may change during application and recommendation period.) • Adjust probable project cost based on inflation rate for future construction

The plan view drawings are suitably scaled and of sufficient detail to identify important project parameters such as: valves, fittings, water service connections, cross connection control and surface restoration. The drawings have been developed from information in past reports and as-built drawings. See Figure 3 – Project Area Overview.

Tabulated cost approximations have been prepared from the developed project plans. The cost approximation includes design, permitting, land acquisition, construction engineering, construction, and construction contingencies, along with material quantities such as length of pipe, number of fitting and connections, and road surface. The cost approximations are based on the year this study is completed with recommended inflation factors for the proposed construction schedule for those sections to be completed in the future.

PMPC has prepared opinions of probable construction costs, in tabular form, for each of the system improvement options. The tables, presented in Appendix B, identify Commission-eligible and non-eligible project costs. Cost approximations for each infrastructure improvement have been prepared as outlined in this Scope of Services.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 30 Final Report 26 21 24 25 4th St. 27 20 3rd St. 19 29

28 2nd St. East St. East 1st St. 22

Beryl Dr. 9 7th St. 18 2nd St. 6th St. Trona Ct. Mineral Dr. 5th St. 5th St. 5th St. 17B 4th St. Marble Ct. 6 23 3rd St. 7 Jade Dr. Love St. 8 Fossil Ct. 17A

Clark St. ColumbiaSt. 5

Jefferson St.

Front St. 4 3 13 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 12 10 LOCATION 1 4TH ST. (EAST) 2 4TH ST. (WEST) 3 FRONT ST. (EAST) 11 Love St. (South) 4 FRONT ST. (WEST) 5 OLD TOWN (SOUTH) 6 OLD TOWN (EAST) Tipperary St. (North)1 SH-72 7 OLD TOWN (WEST) 8 OLD TOWN 16 9 OLD TOWN 4th St. 10 SOUTH JEFFERSON 2 Clark St. (South) 11 SOUTH WEST Meadowlark Dr. 12 SOUTH 3RD ST. 13 WEST RR CROSSING 14 SOUTH ³ 15 SOUTH EAST 16 EAST Linda Dr. Alisha LeslieDr. Way LEGEND 17A STATE HIGHWAY WEST Heather Dr. Heather WATER MAINS 17B STATE HIGHWAY EAST 18 TANK LOOP (SOUTH) 2 INCH 19 TANK LOOP (NORTH) Hallie Way 4 INCH 20 TANK LOOP (EAST) 14 21 TANK LOOP (SOUTH) 6 INCH 22 TANK LOOP (WEST) 15 23 NORTH JEFFERSON 8 INCH 24 WEST ELMO 10 INCH 25 3RD ST. AND EAST ST. 26 5TH ST. ALLEY 12 INCH 27 3RD ST. ALLEY 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 PROPOSED MAIN 28 2ND ST. ALLEY Miles 29 1ST ST. ALLEY

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community L:\ArcGIS\7014\390\HannaMaster Plan.mxd

JOB NO.: 7014.390 DRAWN BY: CK DATE: 6/27/2014 118 E. Bridge PO Box 370 PROJECT AREA LOCATION MAP FIGURE Saratoga, WY 82331 FILE NAME: HANNA MASTER PLAN.MXD CHECKED BY: KS DATE: 6/27/2014 P: 307-326-8301 HANNA WATER SYSTEM LEVEL II STUDY PMPC F: 307-326-8301 AS SHOWN KS DATE: 6/27/2014 REV DATE BY SCALE: APPROVED BY: CIVIL ENGINEERS TOWN OF HANNA 3 WWDC NON-ELIGIBLE PROJECT AREAS

4th Street East (1) The 4th Street East project replaces approximately 1460 lineal feet of water distribution that services the Mountain View Addition. The existing 6” glued joint PVC has been problematic and requires replacement. The existing line will be replaced with 6” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are 16 residential taps identified for replacement along with two fire hydrants in this section of water main. The road surface appears to be recycled asphalt with no curb and gutter.

Valve exercising, outside of current practice, is not recommended in this project area based on its high priority replacement status. Any valves replaced should be on an as necessary or emergency basis.

This project could reduce the operational cost of leak repair as well as improve system flow and reliability. System shutdowns, due to leak repair, could also be reduced. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of the project is $286,000.

4th Street West (2) The 4th Street West project replaces approximately 1540 lineal feet of water distribution main that connects the Mountain View Addition to the main transmission line from the water treatment plant. The existing 6” glued joint PVC has been problematic and requires replacement. The existing line will be replaced with 6” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are no residential taps identified or fire hydrants in this section of water main. There will be a small section of recycled asphalt surface restoration.

Front Street East (3) The Front Street East project replaces approximately 1950 lineal feet of water distribution main in Front and Short Street. The existing ductile iron pipe will be replaced with 6” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are 5 residential taps identified and two fire hydrants proposed for replacement. The road surface appears to be recycled asphalt with no curb and gutter.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 32 Final Report Valve exercising, outside of current practice, is not recommended in this project area based on its high priority replacement status. Any valves replaced should be on an as necessary or emergency basis.

Front Street West (4) The Front Street West project replaces approximately 840 lineal feet of water distribution main in Front Street. The existing PVC pipe will be replaced with 6” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are 4 residential taps identified and two fire hydrants proposed for replacement. The road surface appears to be recycled asphalt with no curb and gutter.

Old Town South (5) The Old Town South project replaces an extensive network of 4” and 6” cast iron main in Madison, 2nd and Taccalone Streets. The existing cast iron pipe will be replaced with approximately 1442 lineal feet of 6” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are 15 residential taps identified and three fire hydrants proposed for replacement. The road surface appears to be recycled asphalt with no curb and gutter.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 33 Final Report Old Town East (6) The Old Town East project replaces an extensive network of 4” and 6” cast iron main in Madison and 3rd Street. The existing cast iron pipe will be replaced with approximately 2000 lineal feet of 6” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are 10 residential taps identified and six fire hydrants proposed for replacement. The road surface appears to be recycled asphalt with no curb and gutter.

Old Town West (7) The Old Town West project replaces a 4” PVC main in 3rd Street. The existing pipe will be replaced with approximately 1100 lineal feet of 6” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are 7 residential taps identified and two fire hydrants proposed for replacement. The road surface is a combination of asphalt pavement and compacted road base with no curb and gutter.

Old Town Distribution (8) The Old Town Distribution project replaces a 6” PVC main in Main Street. The existing pipe will be replaced with approximately 2560 lineal feet of 6” and 12” PVC and ductile iron fittings. There are 21 residential taps identified and one fire hydrant proposed for replacement. The road surface appears to be recycled asphalt with no curb and gutter.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 34 Final Report This project could reduce the operational cost of leak repair as well as improve system flow and reliability. System shutdowns, due to leak repair, could also be reduced. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of the project is $447,000.

South Third Street (12) The South 3RD Street project replaces approximately 2890 lineal feet of distribution line that loops the north side of the south side of town. The existing 10” and 8” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 10” and 8” PVC. There are five service taps identified on the proposed alignment. This project will cross the State Highway. The existing road surface is asphalt pavement.

South Tank Loop (18) The South Tank Loop project would create additional looping capability with the Town of Elmo north of the Jones Addition. The South Tank Loop is considered part of the distribution system. The 2500 feet of new 10” PVC would give the Town additional flexibility in providing water to Elmo in the event of water main failure as well as loop existing dead end water mains.

There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise what valves there are and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $364,000.

East Avenue (25) The East Avenue project replaces approximately 820 feet of 8” distribution line that supplies Elmo. The existing 6” AC pipe will be replaced with 8” PVC along the existing alignment. There are no service connections along the proposed alignment. The existing road surface is asphalt pavement.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 35 Final Report The valves in this project area should be exercised with caution after the project budget for the valve replacements has been approved. Valves not performing should be identified and when five valves have been identified, the valve replacement project should be initiated.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $222,000.

Fifth Street Alley (26) The Fifth Street Alley project replaces approximately 1590 feet of distribution line that supplies the lots running along Fifth Street. The existing 8” line will be replaced with 8” PVC along the original alignment. There are seven service taps identified on the proposed alignment.

The valves in this project area should be exercised with caution after the project budget for the valve replacements has been approved. Valves not performing should be identified and when five valves have been identified, the valve replacement project should be initiated.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $198,000.

Third Street Alley (27) The Third Street Alley project replaces approximately 1500 feet of distribution line that supplies the residents of Elmo. The existing 4” cast iron line will be replaced with 8” PVC along the original alignment. There are eleven service taps identified on the proposed alignment.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $258,000.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 36 Final Report First Street Alley (28) The First Street Alley project replaces approximately 2160 feet of distribution line that supplies the residents of Elmo. The existing 8” line will be replaced with 8” PVC along the original alignment. There are 10 services taps identified along the proposed alignment.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $371,000.

Rosebud Avenue Alley (29) The Rosebud Avenue Alley project replaces approximately 1490 feet of distribution line that supplies the residents of Elmo. The existing 8” PVC will be replaced with 8” PVC along the original alignment. There are seven service taps identified along the proposed alignment. The existing road surface is asphalt pavement.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $267,000.

WWDC ELIGIBLE PROJECT AREAS Old Town Transmission (9) The Old Town Transmission project replaces approximately 4304 lineal feet of transmission line that runs north on Main Street. The existing 12” pipe will be replaced along the original alignment with 12” PVC. There is one service tap identified on the proposed alignment. The existing road surface appears to be recycled asphalt with no curb and gutter.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 37 Final Report

South Jefferson (10) The South Jefferson project replaces approximately 1170 lineal feet of transmission line that runs from South Jefferson, under the Union Pacific Railroad to North Jefferson. The existing 10” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 10” PVC. The existing 18” steel casing under the railroad tracks will be reused for the new installation. There is one service tap identified on the proposed alignment. The existing alignment crosses undeveloped areas so no road surface restoration is anticipated. There are two unused or unnecessary distribution mains proposed to be abandoned during the replacement project.

There are very few valves in this project area, no valve exercising, outside of current practice, is recommended.

South West (11) The South West project replaces approximately 2400 lineal feet of transmission line that connects the water treatment plant pipeline to the south end of the west rail road crossing. The existing 12” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 12” PVC. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

There are very few valves in this project area, no valve exercising, outside of current practice, is recommended.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 38 Final Report West RR Crossing (13) The West RR Crossing project replaces approximately 450 lineal feet of transmission line that runs under the Union Pacific Railroad to North Main. The existing 12” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 12” PVC. The existing 20” steel casing, under the railroad tracks, will be reused for the new installation. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise what valves there are and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $100,000.

South (14) The South project replaces approximately 3320 lineal feet of transmission line that connects the water treatment plant pipeline to the south end of the west railroad crossing. The existing 12” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 12” PVC. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise what valves there are and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $501,000.

South East (15) The South East project replaces approximately 5090 lineal feet of transmission line that connects the water treatment plant pipeline to the south end of the Mountain View Subdivision. The existing 8” PVC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 8” PVC. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise what valves there are and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $547,000.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 39 Final Report East (16) The East project replaces approximately 1550 lineal feet of transmission line that connects the water treatment plant pipeline to the south end of the Mountain View Subdivision. The existing 8” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 10” PVC. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise what valves there are and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $270,000.

State Highway (17) The State Highway project replaces approximately 6090 lineal feet of transmission line that connects the Town of Hanna with Elmo. The existing 8” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 8” PVC. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

The valves in this project area should be exercised, with caution, after the project budget for the valve replacements has been approved. Valves not performing should be identified and when five valves have been identified, the valve replacement project should be initiated.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $818,000.

North Tank Loop (19) The North Tank Loop project would create additional looping capability with the Town of Elmo north of the Jones Addition. The North Tank Loop addition would be considered part of the Town’s transmission system. The 3000 feet of new 10” PVC would give the Town additional flexibility in providing water to Elmo in the event of water main failure. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed. The new main will serve as an important loop in supplying water to Elmo.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 40 Final Report This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $387,000.

As an alternative, the North Tank loop is a good candidate for a fused HDPE installation due to the nature of the terrain and lack of services and laterals on the proposed alignment. An HDPE installation would be less expensive than jointed pipe and provide increased reliability.

Tank Loop East (20) The Tank Loop East project replaces approximately 1700 lineal feet of transmission line that connects Elmo with the Town’s storage tank. The existing 10” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 10” PVC. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise what valves there are and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $219,000.

Tank (21) The Tank project replaces approximately 800 lineal feet of transmission line that connects Hanna with the Town’s storage tank. The existing 10” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 10” PVC. There are no service taps identified on the proposed alignment and very little existing road surface will be disturbed.

There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise what valves there are and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $96,000.

Tank Loop West (22) The Tank Loop West project replaces approximately 2610 lineal feet of transmission line that connects Hanna with the Town’s storage tank. The existing 10” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 10” PVC. There is one service tap identified on the proposed alignment.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 41 Final Report There are very few valves in this project area. Every attempt should be made to exercise valves and any broken valves made part of the next project.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $437,000.

North Jefferson (23) The North Jefferson Street project replaces approximately 1810 lineal feet of transmission line in Jefferson Street connecting to the Town’s storage tank. The existing 10” AC pipe will be replaced along its existing alignment with 10” PVC. There are twelve service taps identified on the proposed alignment. The existing road surface is asphalt pavement.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $403,000.

West Elmo (24) The West Elmo Street project replaces approximately 1300 feet of 8” transmission line that supplies Elmo. The existing 8” AC pipe will be replaced with 8” PVC along the existing alignment. There are no service connections along the proposed alignment. The existing road surface is asphalt pavement.

This project is part of a long term capital improvement plan. The existing infrastructure is performing acceptably. The engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost of replacement is $314,000.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 42 Final Report TASK 8 – ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

For the Master Plan, an environmental report (ER) was produced by Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. for portions of the Town that were identified as needing infrastructure improvements3.

The current list of priority areas to be investigated as identified in the Scope of Services encompasses a larger area than what has been studied in the ER. The additional areas include Elmo, the Jones Addition and all areas south of the UPRR tracks. Figure 4 shows the existing and additional areas.

Letters were sent to all required agencies requesting a review of the proposed project areas and response to any anticipated environmental impacts that the contacted agency identifies.

During the course of the study, the Town of Hanna decided to pursue Drinking Water State Revolving Fund loan for one of the Town’s top priorities, South 4th Street. Based on recommendations from DWSRF Staff, we submitted the environmental review in two parts, one specific for the 4th Street project and one for the remaining project areas of the study. The primary reason for separating the South 4th St project was concern that some of the proposed new mains included in the study may have environmental concerns which would require additional time and investigation than was anticipated for the 4th Street water main replacement project.

3 Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc., City of Hanna Waterline Replacement Environmental Review, November , 2012

7014.390/October 31, 2014 43 Final Report The following is a summary of the responses from the applicable agencies for the South 4th St Project:

Agency Review South 4th St SHPO Historic No adverse effect, no further investigation. Preservation USACE Wetland Upland site, USACE authorization not required. Protection NRCS Farmland No soil data available, no further action Protection required. US Fish & Endangered Project is in compliance. Wildlife Species WY DEQ Air Clean Air Act No concerns except dust during construction Quality and disposal and handling of asbestos cement pipe if present. WY Game & Sage Grouse Area Only comments include recommendations to Fish minimize impacts to nearby water ways. WY State PRRIP Determined to be an existing water related Engineer activity, no mitigation required.

The following is a summary of the responses from the applicable agencies for the all other project areas identified:

Agency Review All Replacements SHPO Historic No adverse effect, no further investigation. Preservation USACE Wetland Protection Some project areas may require a Nationwide Permit 12, projects should be reviewed to determine if a pre-construction notification is required. NRCS Farmland No soil data available, no further action Protection required. Potential wetlands identified and may require USACE 404 permit US Fish & Endangered Species Project is in compliance. Wildlife WY DEQ Air Clean Air Act No concerns except dust during construction Quality and disposal and handling of asbestos cement pipe if present. WY Game & Sage Grouse Area Only comments include recommendations to Fish minimize impacts to nearby water ways. WY State PRRIP Determined to be an existing water related Engineer activity, no mitigation required.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 44 Final Report

Based on the responses received, the only item that may result in additional investigation is if any of the project areas are determined to be in a wetland. If wetlands will be impacted a permit may be required from the USACE. Copies of the response letters are included in Appendix D.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 45 Final Report 21 26 5th St. 24 25 27 20 29

28 East St. East 1st St. 22 19

7th St. Beryl Dr. 18 2nd St.

Trona Ct. 9 Mineral Dr. 5th St. 5th St. 17B 4th St. Marble Ct. Love St. Lincoln St. 23 Jade Dr. Chromite Ct. 7 3rd St. 8 6 Jefferson St.

Fossil Ct.

Clark St.

ColumbiaSt. School St. 5 17A

Harrison St.

Main St. Front St. 3 PROJECT 13 DESCRIPTION 4 LOCATION 10 1 4TH ST. (EAST) 12 2 4TH ST. (WEST) 3 FRONT ST. (EAST) Love St. (South) 4 FRONT ST. (WEST) 11 5 OLD TOWN (SOUTH) 6 OLD TOWN (EAST) 7 OLD TOWN (WEST) 1 SH-72 Tipperary St. (North) 8 OLD TOWN Jackson St. 9 OLD TOWN 4th St. 16 10 SOUTH JEFFERSON Clark St. (South) 11 SOUTH WEST 12 SOUTH 3RD ST. 2 Meadowlark Dr. 13 WEST RR CROSSING 14 SOUTH 15 SOUTH EAST 16 EAST Linda Dr.

Alisha LeslieDr. Way 17A STATE HIGHWAY WEST Heather Dr. Heather 17B STATE HIGHWAY EAST 18 TANK LOOP (SOUTH) 19 TANK LOOP (NORTH) Hallie Way ³ 20 TANK LOOP (EAST) 14 21 TANK LOOP (SOUTH) 22 TANK LOOP (WEST) 23 NORTH JEFFERSON 15 24 WEST ELMO LEGEND 25 3RD ST. AND EAST ST. Environmental Review 26 5TH ST. ALLEY 27 3RD ST. ALLEY 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 OLD PROPOSED 28 2ND ST. ALLEY Miles 29 1ST ST. ALLEY

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community L:\ArcGIS\7014\390\HannaMaster Plan.mxd

JOB NO.: 7014.390 DRAWN BY: BM DATE: 7/14/2014 118 E. Bridge PO Box 370 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW LOCATION MAP FIGURE Saratoga, WY 82331 FILE NAME: HANNA MASTER PLAN.MXD CHECKED BY: KS DATE: 7/14/2014 P: 307-326-8301 HANNA WATER SYSTEM LEVEL II STUDY PMPC F: 307-326-8301 ER1 AS SHOWN KS DATE: 7/14/2014 REV DATE BY SCALE: APPROVED BY: CIVIL ENGINEERS TOWN OF HANNA TASK 9 – IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRAINTS

In the Town of Hanna project constraints range from environmental and access constraints, to regulatory and compliance constraints. Table 4 is a spreadsheet of the projects identified in Task 7 with details on qualifying funding and specific project constraints.

The spreadsheet is a project by project detail of the constraints specific to each project.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 47 Final Report Table 4 – Identification of Constraints for Hanna Water Main Project

Main Project Area General Comments FUNDING SOURCE ELIGIBILITY CONSTRAINTS PERMITS OR PERMISSIONS Classification SLIB - Private WWDC DWSRF WBC RUS ECONOMIC LEGAL ENVIRONMENTAL DEQ WYDOT UPRR MRG Landowner Distribution Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. NO 3 1 4TH STREET EAST NO YES YES YES YES 2 YES NO NO NO 2 4TH STREET WEST Distribution No taps, primary looping line. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3 YES NO NO NO Distribution Minimal taps, carries significant fire flow for NO 3,6 3 FRONT STREET EAST areas on west end of old town NO YES YES YES YES 2 YES NO NO NO Distribution Minimal taps, carries significant fire flow for NO 3,6 4 FRONT STREET WEST areas on west end of old town NO YES YES YES YES 2 YES NO NO NO 5 OLD TOWN SOUTH Distribution Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3,10 YES NO NO NO 6 OLD TOWN EAST Distribution Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3,10 YES NO NO NO 7 OLD TOWN WEST Distribution Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3,10 YES NO NO NO OLD TOWN Distribution Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. NO 3,10 8 DISTRIBUTION NO YES YES YES YES 2 YES NO NO NO OLD TOWN Transmission Main Transmission from WTP to Tank. NO 3,10 9 TRANSMISSION YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO No taps, primary line from supply to north side of Transmission NO 3,7,11 10 SOUTH JEFFERSON town and to fill storage tank YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO YES NO No taps, primary line from supply to north side of Transmission NO 3 11 SOUTH WEST town and to fill storage tank YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO Distribution Minimal taps, carries significant fire flow for NO 3 12 SOUTH 3RD STREET areas on west end of old town NO YES YES YES YES 2 YES NO NO NO No taps, primary line from supply to north side of Transmission NO 3,11 13 WEST RR CROSSING town and to fill storage tank YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO YES NO No taps, primary line from supply to town and to Transmission NO 3 14 SOUTH fill storage tank YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO No taps, primary line from supply to town and to Transmission NO 3 15 SOUTH EAST fill storage tank YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO No taps, primary line from supply to town and to Transmission NO 3 16 EAST fill storage tank YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO 17 STATE HIGHWAY Transmission Minimal taps, primary line from supply to Elmo YES YES YES YES YES 1 NO 3 YES YES NO NO New Water Main, primary loop from storage tank Distribution NO 3 18 SOUTH TANK LOOP to Old Town NO YES YES YES YES 2 YES NO NO NO New Water Main, primary loop from storage tank Transmission 4 5,8 19 NORTH TANK LOOP to Elmo YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO YES No taps, primary line from storage tank to Jones Transmission NO 3 20 TANK LOOP EAST Addition and Elmo YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO No taps, primary line from storage tank to entire Transmission NO 3 21 TANK system YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO Minimal taps, primary line from storage tank to Transmission NO 3 22 TANK LOOP WEST west and south sides of Town YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO Primary line from supply to north side of town Transmission NO 3 23 NORTH JEFFERSON and to fill storage tank YES YES YES YES YES 1 YES NO NO NO 24 WEST ELMO Transmission Elmo west end transmission line, no taps. YES YES YES YES YES 1 NO 3 YES NO NO NO 25 EAST AVENUE Distribution Elmo NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3 YES NO NO NO 26 FIFTH STREET ALLEY Distribution Elmo north end distribution line, several taps. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3 YES NO NO NO 27 THIRD STREET ALLEY Distribution Elmo distribution line, several taps. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3 YES NO NO NO 28 FIRST STREET ALLEY Distribution Elmo distribution line, several taps. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3 YES NO NO NO 29 ROSEBUD AVENUE Distribution Elmo distribution line, several taps. NO YES YES YES YES 2 NO 3 YES NO NO NO

1) Project is eligible for funding from all funding sources based on source criteria. 2) Project is not eligibile for WWWDC funding based on source criteria. 3) All planned work is in existing right of way and or in areas of previously disturbed ground. 4) New pipeline alignment, may be subject to land acquisition and easement issues. 5) New pipeline alignment, may be subject to NEPA review if Federal funds are involved. 6) Previously identified soil conditions may drive up project cost. 7) Ground water conditions may impact project cost and schedule. 8) Difficult terrain with unknown soil conditions. 9) Aging infrastucture with service taps of indeterminate age and conditon. 10) High probability of unidentified, abandonded or unknown utilities. 11) Existing steel chase under rail road right of way.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 48 Final Report TASK 10 – INPUT FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS

The second project meeting was a combined meeting to present growth and demand projections and conceptual project designs. The meeting was held on June 30, 2014 in Hanna. The Town council, Mayor and operation’s staff were on hand to provide input on project progress and specific conceptual design concerns. The following items were presented and discussed:

1. Review and Update 2012 Master Plan Information 2. Identify and prioritize project areas 3. Develop funding scenarios and schedules for projects based upon priorities

The 2012 Master Plan was reviewed and the conclusions presented then are still valid. While Hanna may see some growth due to upcoming energy related projects, the system is sized to handle the anticipated population increase. The DKRW LLC (DKRW) could result in significant increases in population and water demand. However, the DKRW project appears to have a low probability of moving forward at this time due to financing and contract agreements. The Town concurred with the growth and demand projections.

The Town council agreed that if growth were to occur there are a substantial number of vacant homes that could be occupied without straining the system’s ability to provide adequate water. There is also a 300 lot trailer court permitted and previously occupied on the south side of Town. This trailer court could be restored to operation with some improvements to the existing water system. The Town supply would also be adequate if the existing trailer park returned to operation.

The conceptual designs where presented to the Town as a single exhibit and individual project areas. The single exhibit showed that most areas of the Town would be impacted at some point by the proposed infrastructure replacement projects. The individual project area plans provided details such as service connections, hydrants, valves, connection points and street restoration. The Town acknowledged that the projects would be locally disruptive while in progress. Their main concern was that the streets are restored to the pre-project condition. For most of the Town the existing street surface is a compacted recycled asphalt product. In some areas of Town the street surface is asphalt. There is very little concrete curb and gutter in any of the project areas.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 49 Final Report Projects were prioritized by ranking the existing water main by leak history, age, material, number of services and material. Water mains with a leak history and nearing the end of their design life are scheduled for immediate action as funding allows. Water mains with no leak history or age related problems were still scheduled for replacement within the 20 year planning horizon. The Town agreed with the proposed project prioritization schedule. The following are the Towns top priorities: 4th Street, Front Street (Main to Jefferson), Original 4” Mains in Old Town and Elmo, Jefferson (South 3rd to Front Street) Under UPRR

The proposed projects were sized according to total estimated cost. The majority of the project budgets fall between $150,000 and $400,000. This budget range provides for funding and project size options. There is also the option of combining projects to match funding capacity.

Projects were also classified by WWDC criteria into Distribution and Transmission water mains for funding requirements. WWDC funding is only available to transmission projects4. The Town understands which projects are eligible for WWDC funding.

Additional comments from the Town included agreement with the cost estimations and the apparent discrepancy with the Master Plan cost estimations. The Town also noted $67,000 in funding available for street repair on Jefferson.

4 Wyoming Water Development Commission Legislative Water Committee, Operating Criteria of the Wyoming Water Development Program, November 3, 2011

7014.390/October 31, 2014 50 Final Report TASK 11 – SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES

Project schedule is based on specific project milestones. The main project milestones for water main projects are: funding application deadlines, design, bidding and finally construction. Funding deadlines are set by the funding agencies and depend on legislative schedules, availability of specific funds and agency meeting schedules. Table 5 – Priority Project Schedule. presents the twenty-nine Projects divided into WWDC Eligible and Non-WWDC Eligible projects. The Town’s top priorities are scheduled in next ten years, with the remaining projects anticipated to occur twenty years or more in the future.

Bidding schedules can impact not only the schedule but also the final cost of the project. When projects are let to bid very early in the construction season, there is more contractor interest than late in the construction season when firms have less availability. Finally construction schedules vary not only by project size in terms of budget but also project complexities such as difficult soils, tight neighborhood replacement conditions as well as right-of-way and access issues.

Project Area. The top 12 projects listed have been identified as priorities by the Town, and are scheduled within the first ten years.

Project Budget with Inflation Factor. Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost from the detailed concept drawings presented in Task 7. The cost approximations include an inflation factor of 3% per year.

WWDC Funding Eligible. The WWDC provides funding for transmission projects5.

SLIB Funding Eligible. SLIB provides loan funding for water projects.

Construction Timeline. Presented as anticipated number of years until project installation based on project priority need. The highest priority projects are planned to be initiated one per year. Lower priority projects are generically planned to occur after twenty years.

Funding Application Deadline. WWDC funding applications are typically submitted in the fall of the year prior to the planned construction date. SLIB applications are accepted six times a year.

Funding Award Date. Funding is generally awarded in January of each year after application for funding is made.

5 Wyoming Water Development Commission Legislative Water Committee, Operating Criteria of the Wyoming Water Development Program, November 3, 2011

7014.390/October 31, 2014 51 Final Report

Design Days. Design includes project scoping, permitting, construction document review and preparation.

Bidding Days. Bidding days include advertising for bid, pre-bid meetings, bid review and award.

Construction Start. The construction start date includes a time allowance for processing of paperwork, notice to proceed and finalizing contract documents.

Construction Contract Days. Includes actual days in construction from Notice-to- Proceed to completion.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 52 Final Report Table 5 – Priority Project Schedule

Project Area Project Budget Construction Timeline Funding Application Deadline Funding Award Date Design Bidding Construction Start Construction Non-Eligible W/Inflation Factor (Years) (Mo-Yr) (Mo-Yr) Days Days (Mo-Yr) Contract Days

4TH STREET EAST $294,117 1 September-15 January-16 45 30 May-16 45 4TH STREET WEST $172,283 1 September-15 January-16 30 30 May-16 30 FRONT STREET EAST $335,222 2 October-16 January-17 45 30 May-17 60 FRONT STREET WEST $173,350 2 September-16 January-17 30 30 May-17 30 OLD TOWN SOUTH $367,876 3 September-17 January-18 60 30 May-18 60 OLD TOWN EAST $469,036 4 September-18 January-19 60 30 May-19 75 OLD TOWN WEST $280,762 5 September-19 January-20 39 30 May-20 45 OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $533,815 6 September-19 January-20 90 30 June-21 90 SOUTH 3RD STREET $609,784 10 September-23 January-24 90 30 June-25 90 SOUTH TANK LOOP $583,648 20 TBD TBD 82 30 TBD 120 EAST AVENUE $399,703 20 TBD TBD 56 30 TBD 90 FIFTH STREET ALLEY $357,507 20 TBD TBD 50 30 TBD 90 THIRD STREET ALLEY $464,675 20 TBD TBD 65 30 TBD 105 FIRST STREET ALLEY $670,045 20 TBD TBD 94 30 TBD 120 ROSEBUD AVENUE $482,402 20 TBD TBD 68 30 TBD 105

Project Area Project Budget Construction Timeline Funding Application Deadline Funding Award Date Design Bidding Construction Start Construction WWDC Eligible W/Inflation Factor (Years) (Mo-Yr) (Mo-Yr) Days Days (Mo-Yr) Contract Days

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $902,499 7 September-20 January-21 90 30 June-21 120 SOUTH JEFFERSON $201,532 8 September-21 January-22 30 30 May-22 45 SOUTH WEST $468,229 9 September-22 January-23 90 30 June-24 90 WEST RR CROSSING $138,046 20 TBD TBD 19 30 TBD 30 SOUTH $713,800 20 TBD TBD 100 30 TBD 75 SOUTH EAST $802,665 20 TBD TBD 112 30 TBD 120 EAST $407,558 20 TBD TBD 57 30 TBD 90 STATE HIGHWAY $1,274,938 20 TBD TBD 178 30 TBD 180 NORTH TANK LOOP $640,580 20 TBD TBD 90 30 TBD 120 TANK LOOP EAST $372,746 20 TBD TBD 52 30 TBD 90 TANK $167,847 20 TBD TBD 23 30 TBD 45 TANK LOOP WEST $788,803 20 TBD TBD 110 30 TBD 180 NORTH JEFFERSON $728,331 20 TBD TBD 102 30 TBD 150 WEST ELMO $567,190 20 TBD TBD 79 30 TBD 120

7014.390/October 31, 2014 53 Final Report TASK 12 – LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS AND FINAL COST ESTIMATES

Life cycle cost is an essential approach to decide on alternative rehabilitation strategies for infrastructure systems. While estimating lifecycle cost for fixed equipment such as pumps and treatment facilities is relatively straightforward, buried pipeline presents a unique challenge. Common decision variables for water mains include: 1. Type of rehabilitation alternative 2. Implementation timing 3. Relining (only improve pipe hydraulic capacity), 4. Replacement with the same diameter 5. Replacement with larger diameter 6. Do nothing

There are twenty nine conceptual projects proposed in Task 7. Of the twenty nine projects twelve have been identified as very old or failing infrastructure requiring immediate replacement and seventeen are projects that are expected to last longer than the twenty year project planning horizon. The recommended projects are all traditional replacement projects with the exception of the North and South Tank Loops. The replacement pipe material recommended is PVC; both for its long term durability and the Town’s familiarity with working with PVC.

The projects are prioritized based on leak history, age, material type and number of service taps. The most important consideration is leak history. Water main leaks are expensive to repair, interrupt service, could allow system contamination and stress water department personnel and budgets. Water main leaks are the direct result of age and, to some extent, pipe material and installation method. Recent leak history could make the project area a priority.

Age of a water main system is an important factor in project prioritization. All pipe systems have a defined service life. As the limit of the service life approaches more leaks can be expected. For this life cycle cost analysis, older projects have been prioritized higher.

Pipe material has a significant impact on design life of water mains. Hanna has a mix of pipe materials including: cast and ductile iron (CIP, DIP), Asbestos Cement (AC), and Poly-Vinyl Chloride (PVC).

7014.390/October 31, 2014 54 Final Report Cast iron (grey cast iron) is a historical type of pipe manufactured in the 19th and 20th centuries that is used as pressure pipe for transmission of water and sewage. Cast iron pipe was gradually superseded by ductile iron pipe, which is a direct development, with most existing manufacturing plants transitioning to the new material during the 1970s and 1980s.

Asbestos cement (AC) pressure pipe is used primarily for potable water, as well as for sewer mains and industrial effluent and process piping. AC pipe was first introduced in North America in the late 1920s and became a common choice for potable water main construction from the 1940s to the 1970s. The use of AC pipe was largely discontinued in North America in the early 1980s but AC pipe is still a significant portion of the water distribution systems in many North American cities.

Most modern water main installations today are PVC. PVC has been independently evaluated in a study “Long-Term Performance Prediction for PVC Pipe,” Report #2879 by the Water Research Foundation. The study concluded that PVC pipe can be expected to last over 100 years. However, installation methods can create performance issues for PVC, as experienced by the glued joints PVC installed in 4th street. The pipe is not failing, but the brittle glued joints are. Metallic fittings without suitable corrosion protection are also a common failure mechanism in early PVC pipe installations.

While service taps may not increase the risk profile for a specific project area; more taps are an indication of more pipe penetrations that could increase the leak potential along a given stretch of water main. In prioritizing the project areas, those with similar leak and age profiles were prioritized by number of service taps.

The twenty-nine conceptual projects are divided into WWDC Eligible and Non-Eligible Projects and presented in Table 6. This table prioritizes each project area based on the factors described above.

The life cycle estimated project total costs are presented in Table 7. The itemized estimated project costs developed in Task 7 and presented in Appendix B of this report were used for the design and construction costs. To assess the future costs of the projects, an inflation rate of 3% was added to each project based on the anticipated schedule developed in Task 11 and presented in the column labeled “Project Construction Budget with Inflation Factor”. To accommodate the operation and maintenance costs a $0.25 per foot cost was assessed to each project area over a twenty year period. Finally, to give the true cost of a project funded in the future with loaned money, a 2.5% interest rate was applied to the “Project Construction Budget with Inflation Factor” total for a twenty year period. The lifetime costs for projects planned in twenty years are drastically more than the current year project cost, however it is important to remember that the final costs will not be realized until 20 years after the project is completed, or 40 years from the date of this report.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 55 Final Report Table 6 – Town Priorities

Project Area Leak Line # of Main Date Material Length (ft) General Comments Estimated Cost Non-Eligible History Size Taps Classification Installed 1 4TH STREET EAST YES 6" PVC 1463 16 Distribution 1971 Primarily distribution. Glued joint PVC W/Joint failure. $285,550

2 4TH STREET WEST YES 6" PVC 1540 0 Distribution 1971 No taps, primary looping line. Glued joint PVC W/Joint failure. $167,265 Minimal taps, carries significant fire flow for areas on west end of Old Town. 3 FRONT STREET EAST YES 6" PVC&CIP 1948 5 Distribution 1980 $315,979 Metallic fitting corrosion and failure. Minimal taps, carries significant fire flow for areas on west end of Old Town. 4 FRONT STREET WEST YES 6" PVC&CIP 836 4 Distribution 1980 $163,399 Metallic fitting corrosion and failure. 5 OLD TOWN SOUTH YES 6" CIP 1442 15 Distribution UK Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. $336,659

6 OLD TOWN EAST YES 6" AC 2022 13 Distribution UK Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. $416,732

7 OLD TOWN WEST YES 6" PVC 1111 7 Distribution UK Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. $242,188 8 OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION YES 6" PVC 2562 21 Distribution UK Primarily distribution in the oldest part of town. $447,062 12 SOUTH 3RD STREET NO 8"/12" AC 2887 5 Distribution 1981 Minimal taps, carries significant fire flow for areas on west end of Old Town $453,737

18 SOUTH TANK LOOP NO NA NA 2483 0 Distribution NA New water main, primary loop from storage tank to Old Town $363,710

25 EAST AVENUE NO 8" AC 818 0 Distribution 1980 Elmo north end distribution line, several taps. $221,306

26 FIFTH STREET ALLEY NO 4" DIP/AC 1589 7 Distribution 1980 Elmo distribution line, several taps. $197,943

27 THIRD STREET ALLEY NO 4" DIP 1472 11 Distribution 1980 Elmo distribution line, several taps. $257,279

28 FIRST STREET ALLEY NO 6"/8" PVC 2164 10 Distribution 1980 Elmo distribution line, several taps. $370,988

29 ROSEBUD AVENUE NO 8" AC 1485 7 Distribution 1981 Elmo distribution line, several taps. $267,094 Project Area Leak Line # of Main Date Material Length (ft) General Comments Estimated Cost WWDC Eligible History Size Taps Classification Installed 9 OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION YES 12" CIP 4304 1 Transmission UK Main Transmission from WTP to Tank. $733,815 10 SOUTH JEFFERSON YES 10" DIP 1169 1 Transmission UK No taps, primary line from supply to north side of town and to fill storage tank $159,091

11 SOUTH WEST NO 12" AC 2400 0 Transmission 1978 No taps, primary line from supply to north side of town and to fill storage tank $358,859

13 WEST RR CROSSING YES 12" AC 450 0 Transmission 1981 No taps, primary line from supply to north side of town and to fill storage tank $99,727

14 SOUTH NO 12" AC 3314 0 Transmission 1981 No taps, primary line from supply to town and to fill storage tank $500,645

15 SOUTH EAST NO 8" PVC 5088 0 Transmission 1981 No taps, primary line from supply to town and to fill storage tank $546,576

16 EAST NO 10" AC 1550 0 Transmission 1978 No taps, primary line from supply to town and to fill storage tank $269,444

17 STATE HIGHWAY NO 8" AC 6093 0 Transmission 1980 Minimal taps, primary line from supply to Elmo $818,334

19 NORTH TANK LOOP NO NA NA 3000 0 Transmission NA New water main, primary loop from storage tank to Elmo $387,561

20 TANK LOOP EAST NO 10" AC 1708 0 Transmission 1980 No taps, primary line from storage tank to Jones Addition and Elmo $218,949

21 TANK NO 10" AC 790 0 Transmission 1980 No taps, primary line from storage tank to entire system $95,721

22 TANK LOOP WEST NO 10" AC 2606 1 Transmission 1980 Minimal taps, primary line from storage tank to west and south sides of town $436,741

23 NORTH JEFFERSON NO 10" AC 1809 12 Transmission 1977 Primary line from supply to north side of town and to fill storage tank $403,259

24 WEST ELMO NO 8" AC 1298 0 Transmission 1980 Elmo west end transmission line, no taps. $314,039

7014.390/October 31, 2014 56 Final Report Table 7 – Total Lifecycle Cost

Total Permitting Access Pre- Components Total Schedule for Project Construction 20 Yr Operation Project Area Final Design Legal Construction Contingency Inflation Factor Interest Life Monthly Component and Acquisition Construction and Estimated Replacement Budget W/Inflation and Maintenance Lifetime Cost Non-Eligible and Specs Fees Engineering 15% 3% Per Year of SRF Loan Debt Service Cost Mitigation and ROW Cost Engineering Project Cost (years) Factor @ 0.25$/FT

4TH STREET EAST $209,194 $20,919 $0 $0 $0 $20,919 $20,919 $230,114 $34,517 $285,550 1 $8,567 $294,117 $7,315 $83,218.08 $1,572 $384,650 4TH STREET WEST $122,538 $12,254 $0 $0 $0 $12,254 $12,254 $134,792 $20,219 $167,265 1 $5,018 $172,283 $7,700 $48,746 $921 $228,729 FRONT STREET EAST $231,486 $23,149 $0 $0 $0 $23,149 $23,149 $254,635 $38,195 $315,979 2 $19,243 $335,222 $9,740 $94,849 $1,792 $439,810 FRONT STREET WEST $119,706 $11,971 $0 $0 $0 $11,971 $11,971 $131,677 $19,752 $163,399 2 $9,951 $173,350 $4,180 $49,048 $927 $226,578 OLD TOWN SOUTH $246,637 $24,664 $0 $0 $0 $24,664 $24,664 $271,300 $40,695 $336,659 3 $31,217 $367,876 $7,210 $104,088 $1,967 $479,174 OLD TOWN EAST $305,298 $30,530 $0 $0 $0 $30,530 $30,530 $335,828 $50,374 $416,732 4 $52,304 $469,036 $10,110 $132,710 $2,507 $611,856 OLD TOWN WEST $177,427 $17,743 $0 $0 $0 $17,743 $17,743 $195,170 $29,275 $242,188 5 $38,574 $280,762 $5,555 $79,440 $1,501 $365,757 OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $327,518 $32,752 $0 $0 $0 $32,752 $32,752 $360,270 $54,040 $447,062 6 $86,753 $533,815 $12,810 $151,039 $2,854 $697,664 SOUTH 3RD STREET $332,408 $33,241 $0 $0 $0 $33,241 $33,241 $365,649 $54,847 $453,737 10 $156,048 $609,784 $14,435 $172,534 $3,260 $796,753 SOUTH TANK LOOP $262,059 $26,206 $0 $1,000 $5,000 $32,206 $26,206 $288,264 $43,240 $363,710 16 $219,938 $583,648 $12,415 $165,139 $3,120 $761,201 EAST AVENUE $162,129 $16,213 $0 $0 $0 $16,213 $16,213 $178,342 $26,751 $221,306 20 $178,397 $399,703 $4,090 $113,093 $2,137 $516,887 FIFTH STREET ALLEY $145,013 $14,501 $0 $0 $0 $14,501 $14,501 $159,514 $23,927 $197,943 20 $159,564 $357,507 $7,945 $101,154 $1,911 $466,605 THIRD STREET ALLEY $188,483 $18,848 $0 $0 $0 $18,848 $18,848 $207,331 $31,100 $257,279 20 $207,396 $464,675 $7,360 $131,476 $2,484 $603,511 FIRST STREET ALLEY $271,786 $27,179 $0 $0 $0 $27,179 $27,179 $298,964 $44,845 $370,988 20 $299,057 $670,045 $10,820 $189,584 $3,582 $870,449 ROSEBUD AVENUE $195,674 $19,567 $0 $0 $0 $19,567 $19,567 $215,241 $32,286 $267,094 20 $215,308 $482,402 $7,425 $136,492 $2,579 $626,319 Project Area WWDC Eligible

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $537,593 $53,759 $0 $0 $0 $53,759 $53,759 $591,352 $88,703 $733,815 7 $168,685 $902,499 $21,520 $255,355 $4,824 $1,179,375 SOUTH JEFFERSON $116,551 $11,655 $0 $0 $0 $11,655 $11,655 $128,206 $19,231 $159,091 8 $42,441 $201,532 $5,845 $57,022 $1,077 $264,399 SOUTH WEST $262,900 $26,290 $0 $0 $0 $26,290 $26,290 $289,190 $43,379 $358,859 9 $109,370 $468,229 $12,000 $132,482 $2,503 $612,711 WEST RR CROSSING $73,060 $7,306 $0 $0 $0 $7,306 $7,306 $80,366 $12,055 $99,727 11 $38,319 $138,046 $2,250 $39,059 $738 $179,355 SOUTH $366,773 $36,677 $0 $0 $0 $36,677 $36,677 $403,450 $60,518 $500,645 12 $213,155 $713,800 $16,570 $201,964 $3,816 $932,335 SOUTH EAST $400,422 $40,042 $0 $0 $0 $40,042 $40,042 $440,464 $66,070 $546,576 13 $256,089 $802,665 $25,440 $227,108 $4,291 $1,055,214 EAST $197,395 $19,740 $0 $0 $0 $19,740 $19,740 $217,135 $32,570 $269,444 14 $138,114 $407,558 $7,750 $115,316 $2,179 $530,624 STATE HIGHWAY $599,512 $59,951 $0 $0 $0 $59,951 $59,951 $659,463 $98,919 $818,334 15 $456,604 $1,274,938 $30,465 $360,734 $6,815 $1,666,137 NORTH TANK LOOP $279,532 $27,953 $0 $1,000 $5,000 $33,953 $27,953 $307,485 $46,123 $387,561 17 $253,018 $640,580 $15,000 $181,247 $3,424 $836,827 TANK LOOP EAST $160,402 $16,040 $0 $0 $0 $16,040 $16,040 $176,442 $26,466 $218,949 18 $153,797 $372,746 $8,540 $105,466 $1,993 $486,751 TANK $70,125 $7,013 $0 $0 $0 $7,013 $7,013 $77,138 $11,571 $95,721 19 $72,126 $167,847 $3,950 $47,491 $897 $219,288 TANK LOOP WEST $319,957 $31,996 $0 $0 $0 $31,996 $31,996 $351,953 $52,793 $436,741 20 $352,062 $788,803 $13,030 $223,186 $4,217 $1,025,019 NORTH JEFFERSON $295,428 $29,543 $0 $0 $0 $29,543 $29,543 $324,971 $48,746 $403,259 20 $325,072 $728,331 $9,045 $206,076 $3,893 $943,452 WEST ELMO $230,066 $23,007 $0 $0 $0 $23,007 $23,007 $253,072 $37,961 $314,039 20 $253,151 $567,190 $6,490 $160,482 $3,032 $734,162

7014.390/October 31, 2014 57 Final Report TASK 13 – WATER SYSTEM FINANCING

The Hanna water system operates as a Water Enterprise Fund. This section reviews the enterprise fund operation to determine current and anticipated future water system revenues and expenses. The statutory requirement of every water enterprise fund is to be financially self-supporting. For this report a water system is considered to be self- supporting if revenues are sufficient to pay all water system expenses including the following: 1. Retire existing water related debt (principal and interest). 2. Water Department employees’ salaries and costs. 3. Materials, supplies, utilities, and outside services necessary to operate and maintain the water system and provide normal improvements and replacement requirements for the system. 4. Administrative and overhead expenses. 5. Provide an emergency fund that annually accrues at least an amount equal to 1.5-2.5% of the operating expenses. 6. Accrue sufficient funds to pay for major repairs and replacement that will be required during the next twenty (20) years. 7. All other costs necessary for operation of the water system.

EXISTING SYSTEM BUDGET AND FINANCING The Towns budget for the Water Department and the Water Treatment Plant for the 2012-2014 Fiscal Year are presented in Table 8.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 58 Final Report Table 8 – 2012-2014 Fiscal Year Budget

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET WATER FUND REVENUE WATER USER FEES $179,000 $175,000 $150,000 WATER MAINT./METER FEE $43,000 BULK WATER SALES $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 WATER TAP FEES $3,000 $3,000 $1,500 PARTS/MATERIAL/MISCELLANEOUS $750 $750 $1,000 SERVICE CHARGE-PENALTIES $2,500 $2,500 $6,000 INTEREST $500 $400 GRANT-WATER VALVE REPLACEMENT $18,579 $18,579 GRANT-FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT $25,000 $25,000 CARRY OVER $118,000 $65,000 $94,000 TOTAL $304,750 $291,229 $340,079 WATER EXPENSES SALARIES AND WAGES $32,857 $39,128 $42,000 HEALTH INSURANCE $9,994 $14,203 $10,055 FICA CONTRIBUTION $2,190 $2,993 $3,213 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION $2,628 $3,090 $3,200 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION $898 $1,141 $588 WORKERS COMPENSATION $941 $653 $1,554 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR $6,000 $6,000 $4,000 TELEPHONE $575 $575 $450 DUES/TRAINING/TRANSP/LODGING $500 $2,000 $1,625 SHOP SUPPLIES $500 $500 $100 POSTAGE $800 $950 $950 ELECTRICITY $4,800 $4,000 $4,600 HEAT $1,500 $900 $1,500 VEHICLE GAS AND OIL $4,000 $5,000 $4,500 UTILITY CARDS $134 $150 $175 MAYOR/COUNCIL CONTINGENCY $49,149 $5,824 $59,368 SENSUS/INVENSYS SOFTWARE $1,500 $1,500 $1,525 GRANT-WATER VALVE REPLACEMENT $18,579 $532 GRANT-FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT $25,000 TOTAL $118,966 $132,186 $139,935 WATER TREATMENT PLANT SALARIES AND WAGES $56,747 $62,138 $64,000 HEALTH INSURANCE $9,903 $12,851 $9,273 FICA CONTRIBUTION $3,780 $4,754 $4,900 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION $5,896 $6,400 $4,900 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION $1,390 $1,637 $886 WORKERS COMPENSATION $1,885 $1,209 $2,368 WTP WATER SAMPLES $3,500 $3,500 $4,000 WTP MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR $10,000 $13,000 $10,000 WTP TELEPHONE $1,000 $1,000 $1,200 TRAINING/TRANSP/LODGING $1,200 $1,200 $1,000 POSTAGE $450 $500 $1,000 WTP ELECTRICITY $9,500 $9,500 $12,000 WTP HEAT $15,000 $13,000 $8,000 WTP VEHICLE GAS AND OIL $3,100 $3,100 $3,400 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS $650 $650 $3,500 WTP CHEMICALS $12,500 $12,500 $8,000 MAYOR/COUNCIL CONTINGENCY $49,283 $7,887 $59,367 LAND LEASE $2,330 $2,500 TOTAL $185,784 $157,156 $200,294 WATER FUND BALANCE $0 $1,887 -$150

7014.390/October 31, 2014 59 Final Report

The Town of Hanna revised their water rates in the spring of 2013. The revision included decreasing the amount of water that is included in the base rate, increasing the existing tiered rate schedule for water consumption over the base amount and adding a $10 per month meter maintenance fee for every service tap in the system. This was done in an effort to increase water system revenues for the Town. One result of this change is an approximately 10% overall net increase in water system revenues.

The increase appears to be due solely to the new maintenance fee, as water user fees actually decreased by 15% from the 2012-2013 fiscal year to the 2013-2014 fiscal year. A review of the first three months of water usage after the new rates went into effect versus the same months the previous year show that water usage by consumers decreased by an average of 30%. While environmental factors will impact the amount of water used, the higher rates may have reduced usage as well. Due to the fixed costs associated with operation of the water plant, the treatment costs for reduced production do not appear to offset lost consumption revenue.

The rate increase was recommended in the master plan as the Town had an apparent shortfall in its water budget when reserve accounts were removed. The recommendation was intended to promote a self-sustaining water system budget and improve water conservation. The tiered rate has provided some water conservation, however it also reduced revenues from water consumption. Hanna currently has sufficient water supply, and normally overflows their raw water reservoir due to more water coming in then needed to provide for the Towns demand. Further water conservation seems unnecessary, and the socio-economic impacts of the perception of readily available and affordable water to homeowners could be beneficial to the Town.

Based on the requirements stated at the beginning of this section and a review of the 2013-2014 budget, Hanna’s water system is not self-supporting. While the expenses are met, an increase in the base rate of $5.30 would be required for the water fund to provide an emergency fund equal to 2.5% of the annual operating costs (See Table 9.). A base rate increase is recommended rather than an incremental tiered rate increase, as previous tiered rate increases resulted in a net reduction of the consumption revenues.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 60 Final Report Table 9 – Budget Alternative

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET ALT1 WATER FUND REVENUE WATER USER FEES $179,000 $175,000 $150,000 $150,000 $23,977 WATER MAINT./METER FEE $43,000 $43,000 BULK WATER SALES $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 WATER TAP FEES $3,000 $3,000 $1,500 $1,500 PARTS/MATERIAL/MISCELLANEOUS $750 $750 $1,000 $1,000 SERVICE CHARGE-PENALTIES $2,500 $2,500 $6,000 $6,000 INTEREST $500 $400 TOTAL $186,750 $182,650 $202,500 $226,477 WATER EXPENSES SALARIES AND WAGES $32,857 $39,128 $42,000 $42,000 HEALTH INSURANCE $9,994 $14,203 $10,055 $10,055 FICA CONTRIBUTION $2,190 $2,993 $3,213 $3,213 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION $2,628 $3,090 $3,200 $3,200 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION $898 $1,141 $588 $588 WORKERS COMPENSATION $941 $653 $1,554 $1,554 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR $6,000 $6,000 $4,000 $4,000 TELEPHONE $575 $575 $450 $450 DUES/TRAINING/TRANSP/LODGING $500 $2,000 $1,625 $1,625 SHOP SUPPLIES $500 $500 $100 $100 POSTAGE $800 $950 $950 $950 ELECTRICITY $4,800 $4,000 $4,600 $4,600 HEAT $1,500 $900 $1,500 $1,500 VEHICLE GAS AND OIL $4,000 $5,000 $4,500 $4,500 UTILITY CARDS $134 $150 $175 $175 SENSUS/INVENSYS SOFTWARE $1,500 $1,500 $1,525 $1,525 2.5% MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT $5,515 TOTAL $69,817 $82,783 $80,035 $85,550 WATER TREATMENT PLANT SALARIES AND WAGES $56,747 $62,138 $64,000 $64,000 HEALTH INSURANCE $9,903 $12,851 $9,273 $9,273 FICA CONTRIBUTION $3,780 $4,754 $4,900 $4,900 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION $5,896 $6,400 $4,900 $4,900 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION $1,390 $1,637 $886 $886 WORKERS COMPENSATION $1,885 $1,209 $2,368 $2,368 WTP WATER SAMPLES $3,500 $3,500 $4,000 $4,000 WTP MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR $10,000 $13,000 $10,000 $10,000 WTP TELEPHONE $1,000 $1,000 $1,200 $1,200 TRAINING/TRANSP/LODGING $1,200 $1,200 $1,000 $1,000 POSTAGE $450 $500 $1,000 $1,000 WTP ELECTRICITY $9,500 $9,500 $12,000 $12,000 WTP HEAT $15,000 $13,000 $8,000 $8,000 WTP VEHICLE GAS AND OIL $3,100 $3,100 $3,400 $3,400 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS $650 $650 $3,500 $3,500 WTP CHEMICALS $12,500 $12,500 $8,000 $8,000 LAND LEASE $2,330 $2,500 $2,500 TOTAL $136,501 $149,269 $140,927 $140,927 WATER FUND BALANCE -$19,568 -$49,402 -$18,462 $0

7014.390/October 31, 2014 61 Final Report FUNDING SCENARIOS The proposed projects described in Task 7 cannot be funded by the current system rates. The following scenarios were developed to show the required rate increase to pay for the projects with varying amount and sources of financial assistance. The top priority projects anticipated in the first ten years are shown individually, and the remaining projects have been combined into a 20 year project. The projects were also split between WWDC eligible projects and non-eligible projects.

To assess the costs of the projects, several funding scenarios have been investigated. These scenarios vary from a direct funding by user rates to the use of different loan and grant programs.

The first scenario in Table 10 – User Rates with NO Outside Funding Assistance, anticipates that only user fees will be utilized to fund the projects and assumes there will be no state, federal or outside funding assistance. This table calculates the amount the users would have to pay to self-fund the project in the year it is proposed. As the project costs fluctuate, so will the required base rate, being higher some years and lower in other years. While this is not a realistic assessment for a Town to change their rates so erratically, it does show how much each user would have to pay if there were no other funding options available. To afford all of top priority projects over the next 20 years with a single rate increase, the rates would need to be increased by $110 per month for a total base rate of $145 per user. Further rate adjustments may be required to pay for the projects more than 20 years in the future.

The second scenario in Table 11 – User Rates with WWDC Funding with Grants and SLIB Loans assumes there will be some combination of loans and grants to fund the projects. This table funds all WWDC eligible projects with a combination of grants for 67% of the project costs, and a WWDC loan for the remainder of the project costs. All projects that do not qualify are assumed to utilize a DWSRF SLIB loan to fund the entire project.

Table 12 – Impact to User Rates with 100% RUS Loan Funding, shows the impact to user rates if RUS loans were utilized for the entire projects costs for all projects. This assumes no grants would be used and no Town funds would be used until the loans payments began.

Table 13 – Impact to Rates with 100% SRF Funding, shows the impact to user rates if SLIB loans were utilized for the entire projects costs for all projects. This assumes no grants would be used and no Town funds would be used until the loans payments began.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 62 Final Report Table 14 – Impact to User Rates with 100% RUS Grant and Loan Funding, shows the impact to user rates if RUS grants for 30% of the project costs and loans for 70% of the project costs were utilized for the entire projects costs for all projects.

Table 15 – Impact to User Rates with 100% SLIB Funding with 75% Principal Forgiveness, shows the impact to user rates if SLIB loans were utilized for the entire projects costs for all projects. This assumes that Hanna would continue to qualify for 75% principal forgiveness, and that program funding would continue for the entire planning horizon.

Various combinations of financing options may require varying amounts of Town matching funds. This match obligation may require individual user rates to increase. For example to fund the priority projects: with 100% SLIB loans and assuming 75% principal forgiveness user rates would require an adjustment of approximately $20 per month for a total base rate of $55 per user. Any additional funding, that can be leveraged as matching funds such as the 1% specific purpose tax, will reduce the required rate increase amount accordingly. Further rate adjustments may be required to pay for projects more than 20 years in the future.

To complete the priority projects, the required base rate would vary from $49 to $145 per month. As a comparison, 2.5% of Hanna’s Annual Median Household Income is approximately $68 per month.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 63 Final Report Table 10 – User Rates with NO Outside Funding Assistance

Schedule for Impact to User Non-Eligible Inflation Factor Project Budget Annual Fund Projected Monthly Rate Cost Approximation Replacement Rate (400 3% Per Year W/Inflation Factor Contribution Based on Current 35$/Mo Project Area (years) Users)

4TH STREET EAST $285,550 1 $8,567 $294,117 $294,117 $61 $96.27

4TH STREET WEST $167,265 1 $5,018 $172,283 $172,283 $36 $70.89

FRONT STREET EAST $315,979 2 $19,243 $335,222 $335,222 $70 $104.84

FRONT STREET WEST $163,399 2 $9,951 $173,350 $173,350 $36 $71.11

OLD TOWN SOUTH $336,659 3 $31,217 $367,876 $367,876 $77 $111.64

OLD TOWN EAST $416,732 4 $52,304 $469,036 $469,036 $98 $132.72

OLD TOWN WEST $242,188 5 $38,574 $280,762 $280,762 $58 $93.49

OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $447,062 6 $86,753 $533,815 $533,815 $111 $146.21

SOUTH 3RD STREET $453,737 10 $156,048 $609,784 $609,784 $127 $162.04

SOUTH TANK LOOP $363,710

EAST AVENUE $221,306

FIFTH STREET ALLEY $197,943 Long term replacement projects potentially financed through previous rate adjustments. THIRD STREET ALLEY $257,279

FIRST STREET ALLEY $370,988

ROSEBUD AVENUE $267,094

Total of 20+ Year Replacements $1,314,610 20 $1,059,722 $2,374,332 $169,595 $35 $70.33

Schedule for Impact to User WWDC Eligible Inflation Factor Project Budget Annual Fund Projected Monthly Rate Cost Approximation Replacement Rate (400 Project Area 3% Per Year W/Inflation Factor Contribution Based on Current 35$/Mo (years) Users)

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $733,815 7 $168,685 $902,499 $902,499 $188 $223.02

SOUTH JEFFERSON $159,091 8 $42,441 $201,532 $201,532 $42 $76.99

SOUTH WEST $358,859 9 $109,370 $468,229 $468,229 $98 $132.55

WEST RR CROSSING $99,727

SOUTH $500,645

SOUTH EAST $546,576

EAST $269,444

STATE HIGHWAY $818,334

NORTH TANK LOOP $387,561 Long term replacement projects potentially financed through previous rate adjustments.

TANK LOOP EAST $218,949

TANK $95,721

TANK LOOP WEST $436,741

NORTH JEFFERSON $403,259

WEST ELMO $314,039

Total of 20+ Year Replacements $5,342,762 20 $4,306,860 $9,649,622 $964,962 $201 $236.03

7014.390/October 31, 2014 64 Final Report Table 11 – User Rates with WWDC Funding with Grants and SLIB Loans

Schedule for Project Budget Monthly Debt Non-Eligible Inflation Factor SLIB 100% Impact to User Rate (400 Cost Approximation Replacement W/Inflation Service 20 yr Project Area 3% Per Year Loan @ 2.5% Users) (years) Factor Term

4TH STREET EAST $285,550.01 1 $8,567 $294,117 $294,117 $1,535 $3.84

4TH STREET WEST $167,264.85 1 $5,018 $172,283 $172,283 $899 $2.25

FRONT STREET EAST $315,978.66 2 $19,243 $335,222 $335,222 $1,750 $4.37

FRONT STREET WEST $163,399.24 2 $9,951 $173,350 $173,350 $905 $2.26

OLD TOWN SOUTH $336,658.82 3 $31,217 $367,876 $367,876 $1,920 $4.80

OLD TOWN EAST $416,732.32 4 $52,304 $469,036 $469,036 $2,448 $6.12

OLD TOWN WEST $242,188.20 5 $38,574 $280,762 $280,762 $1,466 $3.66

OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $447,061.87 6 $86,753 $533,815 $533,815 $2,787 $6.97

SOUTH 3RD STREET $453,736.78 10 $156,048 $609,784 $609,784 $3,183 $7.96

Total $34.28

20+ Year Replacements $1,314,609.80 20 $1,059,722 $2,374,332 $2,374,332 $12,692 $31.73

Schedule for Project Budget Monthly Debt Impact to WWDC Eligible Inflation Factor WWDC 67% WWDC 33% Cost Approximation Replacement W/Inflation Service 20 yr User Rate Project Area 3% Per Year Grant Loan @ 4.0% (years) Factor Term (400 Users)

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $733,814.58 7 $168,685 $902,499 $604,675 $297,825 $1,826 $4.57

SOUTH JEFFERSON $159,091.43 8 $42,441 $201,532 $135,027 $66,506 $408 $1.02

SOUTH WEST $358,858.50 9 $109,370 $468,229 $313,713 $154,516 $947 $2.37

Total $7.95

20+ Year Replacements $5,706,471.78 20 $4,600,051 $10,306,523 $6,905,370 $3,401,153 $20,855 $52.14

7014.390/October 31, 2014 65 Final Report Table 12 – Impact to User Rates with 100% RUS Loan Funding Schedule for Project Budget Impact to Non-Eligible Inflation Factor RUS 100% Loan Monthly Debt Cost Approximation Replacement W/Inflation User Rate Project Area 3% Per Year @3.25% Service (years) Factor (400 Users)

4TH STREET EAST $285,550 1 $8,567 $294,117 $294,117 $1,686 $4.21

4TH STREET WEST $167,265 1 $5,018 $172,283 $172,283 $987 $2.47

FRONT STREET EAST $315,979 2 $19,243 $335,222 $335,222 $1,921 $4.80

FRONT STREET WEST $163,399 2 $9,951 $173,350 $173,350 $994 $2.48

OLD TOWN SOUTH $336,659 3 $31,217 $367,876 $367,876 $2,109 $5.27

OLD TOWN EAST $416,732 4 $52,304 $469,036 $469,036 $2,688 $6.72

OLD TOWN WEST $242,188 5 $38,574 $280,762 $280,762 $1,609 $4.02

OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $447,062 6 $86,753 $533,815 $533,815 $3,060 $7.65

SOUTH 3RD STREET $453,737 10 $156,048 $609,784 $609,784 $3,495 $8.74

Total $46.37

20+ Year Replacements $1,314,610 20 $1,059,722 $2,374,332 $2,374,332 $13,609 $34.02

Schedule for Project Budget Impact to WWDC Eligible Inflation Factor RUS 100% Loan Monthly Debt Cost Approximation Replacement W/Inflation User Rate Project Area 3% Per Year @3.25% Service (years) Factor (400 Users)

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $733,815 7 $168,685 $902,499 $902,499 $5,173 $12.93

SOUTH JEFFERSON $159,091 8 $42,441 $201,532 $201,532 $1,155 $2.89

SOUTH WEST $358,859 9 $109,370 $468,229 $468,229 $2,684 $6.71

Total $22.53

20+ Year Replacements $5,028,722 20 $4,053,710 $9,082,432 $9,082,432 $52,057 $130.14

7014.390/October 31, 2014 66 Final Report Table 13 – Impact to Rates with 100% SRF Funding

Schedule for Project Budget Impact to User Non-Eligible Inflation Factor SRF 100% Loan Monthly Debt Cost Approximation Replacement W/Inflation Rate (400 Project Area 3% Per Year @2.50% Service (years) Factor Users)

4TH STREET EAST $285,550 1 $8,567 $294,117 $294,117 $1,572 $3.93

4TH STREET WEST $167,265 1 $5,018 $172,283 $172,283 $921 $2.30

FRONT STREET EAST $315,979 2 $19,243 $335,222 $335,222 $1,792 $4.48

FRONT STREET WEST $163,399 2 $9,951 $173,350 $173,350 $927 $2.32

OLD TOWN SOUTH $336,659 3 $31,217 $367,876 $367,876 $1,967 $4.92

OLD TOWN EAST $416,732 4 $52,304 $469,036 $469,036 $2,507 $6.27

OLD TOWN WEST $242,188 5 $38,574 $280,762 $280,762 $1,501 $3.75

OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $447,062 6 $86,753 $533,815 $533,815 $2,854 $7.13

SOUTH 3RD STREET $453,737 10 $156,048 $609,784 $609,784 $3,260 $8.15

Total $35.10

20+ Year Replacements $1,314,610 20 $1,059,722 $2,374,332 $2,374,332 $12,692 $31.73

Schedule for Project Budget Impact to User WWDC Eligible Inflation Factor SRF 100% Loan Monthly Debt Cost Approximation Replacement W/Inflation Rate (400 Project Area 3% Per Year @2.50% Service (years) Factor Users)

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $733,815 7 $168,685 $902,499 $902,499 $4,824 $12.06

SOUTH JEFFERSON $159,091 8 $42,441 $201,532 $201,532 $1,077 $2.69

SOUTH WEST $358,859 9 $109,370 $468,229 $468,229 $2,503 $6.26

Total $21.01

20+ Year Replacements $5,028,722 20 $4,053,710 $9,082,432 $9,082,432 $48,551 $121.38

7014.390/October 31, 2014 67 Final Report Table 14 – Impact to User Rates with 100% RUS Grant and Loan Funding

Schedule for Impact to Non-Eligible Cost Inflation Factor Project Budget RUS 30% RUS 70% Loan Monthly Debt Replacement User Rate Project Area Approximation 3% Per Year W/Inflation Factor Grant @ 3.25% Service (years) (400 Users)

4TH STREET EAST $285,550 1 $8,567 $294,117 $88,235 $205,882 $1,180 $2.95

4TH STREET WEST $167,265 1 $5,018 $172,283 $51,685 $120,598 $691 $1.73

FRONT STREET EAST $315,979 2 $19,243 $335,222 $100,567 $234,655 $1,345 $3.36

FRONT STREET WEST $163,399 2 $9,951 $173,350 $52,005 $121,345 $695 $1.74

OLD TOWN SOUTH $336,659 3 $31,217 $367,876 $110,363 $257,513 $1,476 $3.69

OLD TOWN EAST $416,732 4 $52,304 $469,036 $140,711 $328,325 $1,882 $4.70

OLD TOWN WEST $242,188 5 $38,574 $280,762 $84,229 $196,534 $1,126 $2.82

OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $447,062 6 $86,753 $533,815 $160,145 $373,671 $2,142 $5.35

SOUTH 3RD STREET $453,737 10 $156,048 $609,784 $182,935 $426,849 $2,447 $6.12

SOUTH TANK LOOP $363,710 16 $219,938 $583,648 $175,094 $408,553 $2,342 $5.85

Total $26.34

Total of 20+ Year Replacements $1,314,610 20 $1,059,722 $2,374,332 $712,299 $1,662,032 $9,526 $23.82

Schedule for Impact to WWDC Eligible Cost Inflation Factor Project Budget RUS 30% RUS 70% Loan Monthly Debt Replacement User Rate Project Area Approximation 3% Per Year W/Inflation Factor Grant @ 3.25% Service (years) (400 Users)

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $733,815 7 $168,685 $902,499 $270,750 $631,750 $3,621 $9.05

SOUTH JEFFERSON $159,091 8 $42,441 $201,532 $60,460 $141,073 $809 $2.02

SOUTH WEST $358,859 9 $109,370 $468,229 $140,469 $327,760 $1,879 $4.70

Total $15.77

Total of 20+ Year Replacements $5,342,762 20 $4,306,860 $9,649,622 $2,894,887 $6,754,736 $38,715 $96.79

7014.390/October 31, 2014 68 Final Report Table 15 – Impact to User Rates with 100% SLIB Funding with 75% Principal Forgiveness

Schedule for SLIB Loan 75% Non-Eligible Inflation Factor Project Budget SLIB Loan 25% Monthly Debt Impact to User Cost Approximation Replacement Principal Project Area 3% Per Year W/Inflation Factor @ 2.5% Interest Service Rate (400 Users) (years) Forgivness

4TH STREET EAST $285,550 1 $8,567 $294,117 $220,587 $73,529 $393 $0.98

4TH STREET WEST $167,265 1 $5,018 $172,283 $129,212 $43,071 $230 $0.58

FRONT STREET EAST $315,979 2 $19,243 $335,222 $251,416 $83,805 $448 $1.12

FRONT STREET WEST $163,399 2 $9,951 $173,350 $130,013 $43,338 $232 $0.58

OLD TOWN SOUTH $336,659 3 $31,217 $367,876 $275,907 $91,969 $492 $1.23

OLD TOWN EAST $416,732 4 $52,304 $469,036 $351,777 $117,259 $627 $1.57

OLD TOWN WEST $242,188 5 $38,574 $280,762 $210,572 $70,191 $375 $0.94

OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION $447,062 6 $86,753 $533,815 $400,361 $133,454 $713 $1.78

SOUTH 3RD STREET $453,737 10 $156,048 $609,784 $457,338 $152,446 $815 $2.04

Total $8.77

Total of 20+ Year Replacements $1,314,610 20 $1,059,722 $2,374,332 $1,780,749 $593,583 $9,519 $23.80

Schedule for SLIB Loan 75% WWDC Eligible Inflation Factor Project Budget SLIB Loan 25% Monthly Debt Impact to User Cost Approximation Replacement Principal Project Area 3% Per Year W/Inflation Factor @ 2.5% Interest Service Rate (400 Users) (years) Forgivness

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION $733,815 7 $168,685 $902,499 $676,875 $225,625 $1,206 $3.02

SOUTH JEFFERSON $159,091 8 $42,441 $201,532 $151,149 $50,383 $269 $0.67

SOUTH WEST $358,859 9 $109,370 $468,229 $351,172 $117,057 $626 $1.56

Total $5.25

Total of 20+ Year Replacements $5,342,762 20 $4,306,860 $9,649,622 $7,237,217 $2,412,406 $12,896 $32.24

7014.390/October 31, 2014 69 Final Report WATER SYSTEM FINANCING OPTIONS Funding for water system improvements and repairs can come from a number of sources. The funding sources all have varying degrees of application process and schedule.

This study has identified multiple project funding options that have been considered for water system improvements: WWDC Grants, DWSRF loans, SLIB Mineral Royalty Grants, Wyoming Business Council Grants, Rural Utility Service (RUS) loans and grants, County 1% Specific Purpose Tax and private funding. A brief description of each funding program is provided below:

Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC). WWDC funding packages typically include a 67% grant with the balance of eligible project costs incorporated into a loan from the Water Development Account. Usual loan conditions are a 30-year term at 4% interest. The Water Development Commission has the option of providing a grant for up to 75% of eligible costs and of extending the loan repayment period to 40 years.

WWDC only funds water supply, storage and transmission systems6. A transmission line has been defined as a water main whose primary function is to deliver all water from a source end to a discharge end. Transmission lines generally have few individual service taps and will carry the majority of the flow during times of high use and fire flows.

The Town is advised to consult with the WWDC Project Manager to determine the feasibility of an application for Level III funding to implement its preferred option. If an application is accepted, the WWDO staff will review the request and present a recommendation to the full Commission.

The deadline for WWDC Level III project applications is August 15th if new to the program, or October 1st if the project has gone through Level I or II. The projects developed in this report are currently in program. The final decision for project funding is made at the legislative session. Contact for information and direction is the Wyoming Water Development Office, 307-777-7626.

6 Wyoming Water Development Commission Legislative Water Committee, Operating Criteria of the Wyoming Water Development Program, November 3, 2011

7014.390/October 31, 2014 70 Final Report

Wyoming Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) This program is administered by the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, the Office of State Lands and Investments (OSLI), and the WWDC. Each year, these agencies prepare an Intended Use Plan which contains a comprehensive priority list of public water systems in Wyoming that have expressed interest in the DWSRF, are planning capital improvement projects, have been identified as serious public health risks, have received notices of Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) violations, or were issued administrative orders.

Hanna is currently ranked 21st on the 2015 priority list for “Hanna Water Mains”. The description for this item includes “Replace old, deteriorated and undersized water lines and valves (cross contamination potential).” Projects with higher ranking are considered to have high compliance and public health issues. Hanna is also ranked 85th for miscellaneous improvements including meters and autoread system, water source, transmission, treatment, distribution and storage upgrades.

Funding from the DWSRF has traditionally been a 100% loan for up to 20 years at 2.5% interest. However, policy changes now allow some loans to have principal “forgiveness” up to 75% of the total loan amount. Hanna’s Annual Median Household Income makes it eligible for the full 75% principle forgiveness.

The DWSRF application decisions are made by the State Loan and Investment Board (SLIB). The SLIB meets every other month for review and decision on SRF applications. Submittal of applications is typically required about three months prior to the meeting date.

Office of State Loans and Investments (OSLI) Mineral Royalty Grants The State Loan and Investment Board can provide grants up to 75% of eligible project costs. Criteria to receive a grant of up to 75% are: If the applicant is a municipality and has a population of less than 1,300 or is located within a county where the three- year average of the local government share of state sales and use tax per capita is less than seventy percent (70%) of the statewide average. Applicants who do not meet these requirements can apply for grants of up to 50% of the eligible project costs. The State Loan and Investment Board uses the following criteria when prioritizing funding decisions:

7014.390/October 31, 2014 71 Final Report First, the project must: 1. Alleviate an emergency situation which poses a direct and immediate threat to health, safety or welfare. 2. Be needed to comply with federal or State mandate addressing public health and safety 3. Provide an essential public service, including water supply

Second, the Board’s rules set forth the following additional criteria used in awarding Mineral Royalty Grants:

1. The extent of match committed to the project from all sources 2. The applicant has made a significant commitment of local resources 3. The applicant has matching funds from other than State grants 4. The project is appropriately sized in relation to the population served 5. The relative urgency of the project 6. The applicant is current on repayment obligations to the Board 7. The applicant plans to use Wyoming professional firms and contractors 8. The financial need of the applicant as determined by the Board 9. The percentage of the applicant’s population served by the project

In addition, the Board gives priority to applicants socially or economically impacted by development of minerals leased under the Federal Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. Project must be reviewed by appropriate State Agencies and the reviews are used in formulating funding recommendations.

The Mineral Royalty Grant program has no set priority list or numerical ranking of projects. If a project meets the requirements and funding is available, then funding has been traditionally recommended and approved for those projects. However, as noted in other funding source descriptions, applications for assistance often greatly exceed available appropriations.

The MRG Program application decisions are made by the State Loan and Investment Board (SLIB). The SLIB meets twice a year for review and decision on MRG applications. Submittal of applications is typically required about four months prior to the meeting date.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 72 Final Report Wyoming Business Council (WBC) The WBC has three grant programs providing assistance to municipalities. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) are available for up to $300,000 for community facilities and public infrastructure. CGBD is a federally funded pass through grant program from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Annual funding ranges from $2.2 to $3.75 million for the program. Competition for these grants is formidable. Application procedures are available on the WBC website. The other two grant programs administered by the WBC are within the Business Ready Community Program (BRC) and are not applicable to Hanna’s needs for replacement of water distribution lines. The BRC program is formatted to attract or retain businesses, provide for data centers, downtown development, community enhancement, and child/senior care facilities.

The WBC meets twice a year, typically May and August. Applications are due in January for the May meeting and May for the August meeting.

United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development Program USDA Rural Development Program (RDP) provides funding opportunities in the form of payments, grants, loans, and loan guarantees, for the development and commercialization of vital utility services. These programs revitalize rural communities with a variety of infrastructure improvements, and create sustainable opportunities for wealth, new jobs, and increased economic activity in rural America.

Purposes: To develop water and waste disposal systems in rural areas and towns with a population not in excess of 10,000. The funds are available to public bodies, non- profit corporations and Indian tribes.

Eligibility: To qualify, applicants must be unable to obtain the financing from other sources at rates and terms they can afford and/or their own resources. Funds can be used for construction, land acquisition, legal fees, engineering fees, capitalized interest, equipment, initial operation and maintenance costs, project contingencies, and any other cost that is determined by the Rural Development to be necessary for the completion of the project. Projects must be primarily for the benefit of rural users.

Terms: The rates that are used to calculate these loans are subject to change quarterly. Loans are made based on the applicant's authority and the life expectancy of the system's project, which may be up to the maximum of 40 years.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 73 Final Report Requirements: The material submitted with the application should include an application SF 424.2, two copies of the Preliminary Engineering Report, Environmental Report, population and median household income of the area to be served, current audits or financial information for the past three years, evidence of outstanding indebtedness, organizational documents, the applicant's IRS tax identification number, DUNS number, a proposed operating budget, and some certification forms. This loan program is based on repayment ability. These loans are calculated on similar systems rates, median household income, financial status of the system, and outstanding indebtedness. There are some systems that qualify for grant funding; however, grant funding availability is limited. Applicant contributions show ownership in the projects and are often recommended. These applicant contributions are the first money spent in any project.

Where to apply: Applications are accepted at any time through our Rural Development State and Area Offices. To locate an office near you go to http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/recd_map.html

Hanna’s median family income is below the state median; Hanna qualifies for a 30% grant – 70% loan funding package with an intermediate loan rate of 3.25%.

Rural Development funding was not used in any of the funding scenarios. Although the funding is available, it has a higher interest rate than DWSRF loans with less potential for grant funding or principle forgiveness.

Community Facilities Direct Loans Loan funds may be used to construct, enlarge, or improve community facilities for health care, public safety, and public services. This can include costs to acquire land needed for a facility, pay necessary professional fees, and purchase equipment required for its operation.

Applicants must have the legal authority to borrow and repay loans, to pledge security for loans, and to construct, operate, and maintain the facilities. They must also be financially sound and able to organize and manage the facility effectively.

Repayment of the loan must be based on tax assessments, revenues, fees, or other sources of money sufficient for operation and maintenance, reserves, and debt retirement. Feasibility studies are normally required when loans for the project will significantly change the borrower’s financial operations. The feasibility study should be prepared by an independent consultant with recognized expertise in the type of facility being financed. A WWDC Master Plan study has met this requirement for past projects, and this report is structured to meet RDP requirements.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 74 Final Report Hanna’s Median Household Income of $32,679 is 58% of the State of Wyoming MHI of $56,573 so the Town will qualify for a loan rate of 4.5%.

Loan repayment terms may not exceed the applicant’s authority (under State law or organizational structure), the useful life of the facility, or a maximum 40 years.

Bonds or notes pledging taxes, assessments, or revenues will be accepted as security if they meet statutory requirements. Hanna would be required to hold a bond election and issue general obligation bonds to guarantee loan repayment.

Applications are handled by USDA Rural Development field offices. Rural Development staff is available to discuss a community's needs and the services available. Field staff can provide application materials and current program information, and assist in the preparation of an application.

The Community Facility application process is a two-stage procedure (pre- application and application). Approximately 45 days are required to determine applicant eligibility, project priority status, and funding availability. After an application is submitted, time to process the application depends upon the scope of the project, environmental review, and legal issues.

Community Facilities Direct loan funding was not used in any of the funding scenarios. Although the funding is available, it has a higher interest rate than DWSRF loans.

Community Facility Grants The Rural Development Program can provide grants for water projects in rural areas and towns. Grants are authorized on a graduated scale. Applicants located in small communities with low populations and low incomes will receive a higher percentage of grants. Applicants must have the legal authority necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed facility and also be unable to obtain needed funds from commercial sources at reasonable rates and terms.

Grant funds can be used to construct, enlarge, or improve community facilities for health care, public safety, and community and public services. This can include the purchase of equipment required for a facility's operation. A grant may be made in combination with other Community Facility financial assistance such as a direct guaranteed loan, applicant contributions, or loans and grants from other sources.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 75 Final Report The amount of grant assistance for project costs depends upon the median household income, the population in the community where the project is located, and the availability of grant funds. In most instances, projects, which receive grant assistance, have a high priority, are leveraged with other loans (including USDA loans), and grant awards. Grant assistance may be available for up to 75% of project costs.

Priority is given to projects that: • Serve small communities with the highest priority going to projects located in a community with a population of 5,000 or less. • Serve low-income communities with the highest priority going to projects serving communities with median household incomes below the higher of the poverty line or 60% of the State non-metropolitan median household income. • Loan and grant conditions are subject to negotiations between the Town and staff of USDA. While a 75% grant 25% loan is allowable under applicable regulations, the shortage of funds would probably result in a 50%/50% arrangement. • Community Facilities Grants funding was not used in any of the funding scenarios. Although the funding is available, it is often difficult to obtain.

Private Lenders There is potential for a public water system to acquire private financing for system improvements. While such financing is available, the interest rates and collateral requirements make such funding an unlikely option for Hanna.

There is no guarantee that the public agencies will have funds available or will agree to provide financing for any aspect of the recommended improvements to the Hanna water system. The Town has the option of seeking private funding. For example, Kaiser & Company in Cheyenne, Wyoming, has worked with other types of assessment districts to provide funding for improvements, including water and sewer system upgrades.

The Town, with assistance from a bonding company, could issue general obligation bonds in the amount necessary to fund some or all system improvements. This approach would make construction funding available up front with repayment guaranteed by general obligation bonds guaranteed by property assessments. The bonding process requires approval of a majority of homeowners at a special election. The amount assessed against each homeowner would be based on a percentage of the valuation of the property. If the Town is interested in this funding option, it could contact a bonding company for specific details and a more accurate estimate of end user costs.

Private Lender funding was not used in any of the funding scenarios. Although the funding is available, it is typically more expensive.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 76 Final Report Specific Purpose Tax Carbon County collects a 1% specific purpose tax and distributes it to the various municipalities based on population. Carbon County funds made available for infrastructure projects and the funds can be used as matching funds for WWDC loans and SLIB grants.

COMMENTS AND REQUIREMENTS Any public funding program receiving federal assistance, including USDA Rural Development and SRF, now requires compliance with all aspects of Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) minimum wage and project reporting requirements. Public funding receiving federal assistance is also subject to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance.

Rural Development and the State Revolving Loan Fund also require an Environmental Report submitted with the application for funding. Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) has prepared the Environmental Report, which will be submitted as a stand-alone document separate from the final project report7.

State and Federal funding agencies require three years of financial records demonstrating that the Town has sufficient revenues to cover debt service on a loan, to pay ongoing maintenance costs, and cover major system repair and component replacement costs. Table 16 summarizes the major funding agencies and the information required for their funding applications.

7 Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. City of Hanna Waterline Replacement Environmental Review, November, 2012.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 77 Final Report Table 16 – Funding Source Application Requirements

Q AGENCIES REQUIREMENT SLIB WWDC RUS Standard Form 424, “Application for Federal Assistance” X Standard Form 424A, “Budget Information – Non-Construction Programs” X Standard Form 424B, “Assurances – Non-Construction Programs” X Standard Form LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activity” X Form RD 400-1, “Equal Opportunity Agreement” X Form RD 400-4, “Assurance Agreement (Under Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964)” X Evidence of Legal Existence X X List of Directors and Officers X IRS Tax Exempt Status X Debarment and Suspension Rules X X Drug-Free Workplace Requirements X Audit X Financial Statements X X DUN's Number X Entity Information X X Requested Financing Plan X X Existing Water Supply System X Financial Information X X Project Description, Summary, Goals and Objectives X X X Engineer's Rate Study Report X DEQ permit to construct X X X Property Assessments X Needs Assessment X

7014.390/October 31, 2014 78 Final Report BIBLIOGRAPHY AVI Professional Corporation. (September 2012). Hanna Master Plan Level I Study. Western EcoSystems Technology, I. (November 2012). City of Hanna Waterline Replacement Environmental Review. Wyoming Water Development Commission Legislative Select Water Committee. (November 2011). Operating Criteria of the Wyoming Water Development Program.

7014.390/October 31, 2014 79 Final Report

APPENDIX A

HANNA WATER VALVE SWING TIES

FID ID Street1 Street2 Valve Location FldMeas1 Fldmeas2

0 MC-LEHO Leslie Way Hollie Way 6 W. Center of Int FH (SW) = 2 FT N/A 1 MC-PHO-1 Pamela Way Hollie Way 6 W. Center of Int FH (W) = 47 ft N/A 2 MC-PHO-2 Pamela Way Hollie Way 6 W. Center of Int FH (W) = 1 ft N/A 3 MC-P Pamela Way N/A 6 S. Edge of Road (Between Lots 3 and 4) FH (S) = 1 ft N/A 4 MC-LEP-1 Leslie Way Pamela Way 6 E. Center of Int FH (SE) = 1 ft N/A 5 MC-LEP-2 Leslie Way Pamela Way 6 S. Center of Int FH (S) = 6 ft PP (S) = 30 ft 6 MC-LEP-3 Leslie Way Pamela Way 6 S. Center of Int WV (S) = 7.6 ft PP (S) = 38 ft 7 MC-L-E Linda Drive N/A 6 E. End of Street FH (S) = 1 ft N/A 8 MC-L-W Linda Drive N/A 6 Block 2 Lot 5 FH (S) = 1 ft N/A 9 MC-LEL-E Leslie Way Linda Drive 6 E. Center of Int FH (SE) = 1 ft N/A 10 MC-LEL-N Leslie Way Linda Drive 6 S. Center of Int PP (S) = 22 ft N/A 11 MC-LEL-S Leslie Way Linda Drive 6 S. Center of Int PP (S) = 24 ft N/A 12 MC-LEA-N Leslie Way Alisha Drive 8 W. Center of Int PP (SE) = 45 ft N/A 13 MC-LEA-S Leslie Way Alisha Drive 6 S. Center of Int FH (SW) = 1 ft N/A 14 MC-HA Highway 72 Alisha Drive 8 S. Corner of Hanna Lot 5 PP (SE) = 54 ft SS (E) = 42 ft 15 MV-H-N Highway 72 N/A 10 S. Corner of Hanna Lot 1 PP (SE) = 59 ft N/A 16 MV-H-S Highway 72 N/A 8 S. Corner of Hanna Lot 1 PP (NE) = 58 ft N/A Old 1st Wyoming Bank Sign (SE) = 63 17 MV-HSC-S Highway 72 South Clark Street 10 S. Edge of South Clark Street ft N/A 18 MV-HSC-E Highway 72 South Clark Street 10 S. Edge of South Clark Street FH (SE) = 7 ft N/A 19 MV-HE-S1 Heather Drive N/A 10 S. End of Heather Drive N/A N/A 20 MV-HE-S2 Heather Drive N/A 8 S. End of Heather Drive N/A N/A 21 MV-HE-E1 Heather Drive N/A 8 E. Center of LDS Parcel Curb (W) = 3 ft N/A 22 MV-HE-E2 Heather Drive N/A 8 E. Side of Street / NW Corner LDS Curb (W) = 3 ft N/A 23 MV-HE-N1 Heather Drive N/A 8 NW Corner of Assembly of God FH (NE) = 17 ft N/A 24 MV-HE-N2 Heather Drive N/A 8 NW Corner of Assembly of God FH (E) = 1 ft N/A 25 MV-HEM-S Heather Drive Meadowlark Drive 8 E. Center of Int PP (NE) = 12 ft N/A 26 MV-HEM-N Heather Drive Meadowlark Drive 6 E. Center of Int PP (E) = 15 ft N/A MV-HEM- 27 W Heather Drive Meadowlark Drive 6 W. Center of Int FH (N) = 36 ft N/A 28 MV-M-S Meadowlark N/A 6 NW. Corner Block 2 Lot 6 FH (SW) = 4 ft N/A

29 MV-L Larkspur Drive N/A 6 S. End of Street FH (W) = 2.6 ft N/A 30 MV-LM-S Larkspur Drive Meadowlark Drive 6 S. Center of Int PP (NW) = 12 ft N/A 31 MV-LM-N Larkspur Drive Meadowlark Drive 6 E. Center of Int PP (W) = 21 ft N/A 32 MV-M-N Meadowlark N/A 6 Center of Street Lot 16 PP (N) = 36.4 ft N/A 33 MV-LSC-E Larkspur Drive South Clark Street 6 SE. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (E) = 1 ft N/A 34 MV-LSC-W Larkspur Drive South Clark Street 6 Center of Int PP (SE) = 50 ft N/A 35 MV-LSC-S Larkspur Drive South Clark Street 6 S. Center of Int PP (E) = 53.7 ft N/A MV-SC- 36 SH/S5 South Clark Alley 6 Center of Alley Way FH (S) = 4 ft N/A 37 MV-HSC Heather Drive South Clark Street 6 SE. Center of Int SL (W) = 46 ft N/A 38 MV-SC South Clark N/A 6 East Corner of Block 4 Addition Lot 6 FH (SE) = 1 ft N/A 39 MV-LSC-N South Clark Larkspur 6 NE. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (E) = 1 ft N/A South 5th 40 MV-S5SC Street South Clark Street 6 NW. Center of Int FH (NW) = 1 ft N/A South 5th 41 MV-S5 Street N/A 4 Mountain View Block 2 Lot 29 PP (E) = 87 ft Gas Meter (SE) = 46 ft MV-S4SC- South 4th 42 W Street South Clark Street 6 W. Center of Int (FH Lead) Telephone Pedestal (SE) = 5 ft N/A South 4th 43 MV-S4SC-E Street South Clark Street 4 NE. Center of Int N. Tennis Court Net (SE) = 36 ft N/A 44 MV-SCSH South Clark South Harrison 6 NE. Center of Int/E. Block 3 Lot 4 Telephone Pedestal (NE) = 27.4 ft N/A MV-S4SH- South 4th 45 W Street South Harrison 6 NE. Center of Int FH (NW) = 1 ft N/A South 4th 46 MV-S4SH-E Street South Harrison 6 NE. Center of Int Corner of Drive (W) = 12.4 ft N/A South 4th 47 MV-S4SH-S Street South Harrison 6 NE. Center of Int Corner of Drive (NW) = 13.4 ft N/A South 4th 48 MV-S4 Street N/A 6 SE. Corner Block 1 Lot 9 (FH Lead) FH (N) = 1 ft N/A South 4th 49 MV-S4SA-S Street South Adams Street 6 SW Center of Int SL (N) = 4 ft N/A South 4th 50 MV-S4SA-N Street South Adams Street 6 NE Center of Int PP (NW) = 14 ft N/A 51 MV-JSA Jackson Street South Adams Street 6 NE Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (NE) = 1 ft N/A South 3rd 52 MV-S3ST-N Street South Tipperary Street 4 SE. Center of Int Meter Pit (N) = 1 ft N/A South 3rd 53 MV-S3ST-S Street South Tipperary Street 4 SE. Center of Int Meter Pit (N) = 18 ft PP (NW) = 44.4 ft South 5th 54 MV-S5SL Street South Love Street 4 NE Center of Int (FH Lead) Old FH (NE) = 1 ft N/A 55 MV-SL N/A South Love Street 4 Midblock Between South 5th and Mtn. View Corner Drive (E) = 67 ft Corner Drive Block 3 Lot 5 = 58 ft

South 3rd 56 MV-S3SL-E Street South Love Street 8 NW Center of Int PP (NW) = 48 ft FH (NW) = 10.7 ft South 3rd 57 MV-S3SL-N Street South Love Street 8 NW Center of Int (FH Lead) PP (NW) = 40.5 ft FH (N) = 2 ft South 3rd 58 MV-S3SL-S Street South Love Street 8 NW Center of Int PP (NW) = 42 ft FH (N) = 9 ft 59 O-FCL Front Street Clark Street 6 E. Center of Int PP (N) = 11.5 ft N/A 60 O-F-CL/M Front Street N/A 6 Midblock Between Clark and Main SW Fence Corner = 1 ft N/A 63 O-FM-W Front Street Main Street 6 S. Center of Int N/A N/A 61 O-FM-S Front Street Main Street 6 SE. Center of Int N/A N/A 62 O-FM-E Front Street Main Street 6 NE. Center of Int FH (NE) = 15.7 ft WV (NW) = 22.5 ft 64 O-FM-N Front Street Main Street 6 N. Center of Int FH (E) = 12.5 ft PP ( NE) = 22.7 ft 65 O-FH-N Front Street Harrison Street 6 Center of Int PP (NE) = 41 ft FH (SE) = 43 ft 66 O-FH-S Front Street Harrison Street 6 SE. Center of Int N/A N/A 67 O-FS Front Street School Street 6 N. Center of Int SW Building Corner (NE) = 54 ft NW Building Corner (NE) = 70 ft 68 O-FA-N Front Street Adams Street 6 Center of Int WV (SW) = 19 ft WV (SE) = 18 ft 69 O-FA-W Front Street Adams Street 6 SW Center of Int Telephone Pedestal (SE) = 43 ft WV (E) = 20 ft 70 O-FA-E Front Street Adams Street 6 SE Center of Int Telephone Pedestal (S) = 31 ft WV (W) = 20 ft 71 O-F-A/MA Front Street N/A 6 Midblock Between Adams and Madison Old Flag Pole (NE) = 55 ft NW Corner U.P. Clubhouse = 12.4 ft 72 O-FMA-W Front Street Madison Street 6 SW. Center of Int PP (SE) = 36 ft WV (E) = 23.6 ft 73 O-FMA-S Front Street Madison Street 6 S. Center of Int PP (SW) = 39 ft WV (W) = 23.6 ft 74 O-FMA-N Front Street Madison Street 6 N. Center of Int PP (SW) = 77 ft N/A 75 O-HMA-S Highway 72 Madison Street 6 SW. Center of Int Point (SW) = 43.5 ft Point (S) = 42 ft 76 O-HMA-N Highway 72 Madison Street 6 NW. Center of Int PP (SE) = 52.8 ft Telephone Pedestal (SW) = 25 ft 77 O-TMA-N Madison Street Taccalone Street 4 E. Center of Int FH (SW) = 16 ft WV (S) = 16 ft 78 O-TMA-S Madison Street Taccalone Street 4 SE. Center of Int FH (NW) = 3 ft WV (N) = 16 ft 79 O-MA-T/3 Madison Street N/A 4 Midblock Between Taccalone and 3rd Street FH (W) = 3 ft N/A 80 O-3MA-N 3rd Street Madison Street 4 S. Center of Int PP (NW) = 63 ft WV (SW) = 10 ft 81 O-3MA-S 3rd Street Madison Street 4 SE. Center of Int PP (NW) = 67 ft WV (NE) = 10 ft 82 O-3L-S 3rd Street Love Street 4 S. Center of Int PP (NE) = 57 ft Lot 1 NE House Corner (W) = 87 ft 83 O-3L-N 3rd Street Love Street 4 E. Center of Int PP (NE) = 51 ft N/A 84 O-3A-W 3rd Street Adams Street 4 SW. Center of Int N/A N/A 85 O-3A-S 3rd Street Adams Street 4 S. Center of Int PP (N) = 35 ft Stop Sign (SE) = 16 ft

86 O-3A-N 3rd Street Adams Street 4 NE. Center of Int FH (E) = 1 ft N/A 87 O-H-2/3 Harrison Street N/A 4 Midblock Between 2nd and 3rd FH (S) = 15 ft N/A 88 O-3H 3rd Street Harrison Street 4 S. Center of Int N/A N/A 89 O-M-2/3-E Main Street N/A 6 Midblock Between 2nd and 3rd (Lot 13) N/A N/A 90 O-M-2/3-W Main Street N/A 6 Midblock Between 2nd and 3rd (Lot 7) N/A N/A 91 O-3M-S 3rd Street Main Street 6 S. Center of Int PP (NW) = 51 ft PP (NE) = 33.4 ft 92 O-3M-N 3rd Street Main Street 4 E. Center of Int PP (NW) = 51.1 ft PP (NE) = 28 ft 93 O-M-3/5 Main Street N/A 4 Midblock Between 3rd and 5th N/A N/A 94 O-5M-S 5th Street Main Street 2 E. Center of Int FH (N) = 1 ft N/A 95 O-5M-N 5th Street Main Street 12 NE. Center of Int FH (SW) = 10 ft WV (E) = 7 ft 96 O-5M-E 5th Street Main Street 10 NE. Center of Int FH (SE) = 5 ft WV (W) = 7 ft 97 O-2CL 2nd Street Clark Street 4 E. Center of Int N/A N/A 98 O-CL-2/3-1 Clark Street N/A 4 Midblock Between 2nd and 3rd (Lot 7) N/A N/A 99 O-CL-2/3-2 Clark Street N/A 4 Midblock Between 2nd and 3rd (Lot 7) N/A N/A 100 O-CL-2/3-3 Clark Street N/A 4 Midblock Between 2nd and 3rd (Lot 7) N/A N/A 101 O-2CO 2nd Street Columbia Street 2 W. Center of Int PP (SW) = 25.9 ft MH (NE) = 33.1 ft Columbia 102 O-CO-2/3 Street N/A 4 Midblock Between 2nd and 3rd (Lot 15) N/A N/A 103 O-3CO 3rd Street Columbia Street 4 E. Center of Int PP (NW) = 29 ft PP (SE) = 44 ft Jefferson 104 J-JH Street Highway 72 10 N. Center of Int FH (W) = 22 ft N/A Jefferson 105 J-JT-N Street Taccalone Street 10 Center of Int FH (SE) = 48.8 ft N/A Jefferson 106 J-JT-W Street Taccalone Street 10 W. Center of Int N/A N/A Jefferson 107 J-JT-S Street Taccalone Street 10 SE. Center of Int FH (E) = 40.6 ft N/A Jefferson 108 J-J-T/3 Street N/A 10 Midblock Between Taccalone and 3rd MH (SE) = 28 ft N/A 109 J-3J-S 3rd Street Jefferson Street 10 Center of Int N/A N/A 110 J-3J-N 3rd Street Jefferson Street 4 NW. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (SW) = 1 ft N/A Jefferson 111 J-J-4/5 Street N/A 10 Midblock Between 4th and 5th N/A N/A 112 J-5J-W 5th Street Jefferson Street 10 W. Center of Int PP (SE) = 44.3 ft WV (SE) = 48 ft 113 J-5J-S1 5th Street Jefferson Street 10 SW. Center of Int PP (SW) = 20 ft WV (SE) = 6 ft 114 J-5J-S2 5th Street Jefferson Street 10 SW. Center of Int FH (E) = 57.8 ft WV (NW) = 6 ft

115 J-5J-E 5th Street Jefferson Street 10 S. Center of Int FH (SE) = 32.8 ft WV (SW) = 52.7 ft 116 J-5J-N 5th Street Jefferson Street 10 NE. Center of Int N/A N/A 117 J-6J-N 6th Street Jefferson Street 10 Center of Int N/A N/A 118 J-6J-S 6th Street Jefferson Street 10 SW. Center of Int (FH Lead) N/A N/A 119 J-7J-S 7th Street Jefferson Street 10 Center of Int FH (S) = 41 ft N/A 120 J-7J-N 7th Street Jefferson Street 10 NE. Center of Int FH (SW) = 44.4 ft N/A 121 J-7L 7th Street Lincoln Street 4 N. Center of Int Rock Wall (SW) = 50 ft N/A 122 J-L-6/7 Lincoln Street N/A (Alley) 4 Midblock Between 6th and 7th PP (NW) = 26 ft FH (NE) = 9 ft 123 J-L-5/6 Lincoln Street N/A (Alley) 4 Midblock Between 5th and 6th (FH Lead) FH (SW) = 1 ft N/A 124 J-5L 5th Street Lincoln Street 4 NE. Center of Int PP (NW) = 42 ft Block 3 Corner (SW) = 68 ft 125 J-4L 4th Street Lincoln Street 4 NW. Center of Int PP (SW) = 37.6 ft Property Post (NE) = 15 ft 126 J-LJA Lincoln Street Jade Drive 6 N. Center Of Int FH (NE) = 17.8 ft N/A 127 J-JA-W Jade Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 1 Lot 4 SE Prop. Corner (NW) = 18.8 ft N/A 128 J-JA-W2 Jade Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 1 Lot 8 FH (NW) = 44.6 ft N/A 129 J-JA-N Jade Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 2 Lot 14 FH (S) = 21 ft WV (E) = 78 ft 130 J-JA-E Jade Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 2 Lot 15 WV (W) = 78 ft Lot 15 NE Corner (S) = 10 ft 131 J-JAM-N Jade Drive Mineral Drive 8 NW. Center of Int WV (SW) = 20 ft WV (SE) = 21 ft 132 J-JAM-W Jade Drive Mineral Drive 6 W. Center of Int FH (SW) = 50 ft WV (E) = 8 ft 133 J-JAM-E Jade Drive Mineral Drive 6 W. Center of Int FH (SW) = 56 ft PP (SE) = 78 ft 134 J-JAH-W Jade Drive Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int FH (NW) = 2 ft WV (E) = 48 ft 135 J-JAH-N Jade Drive Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int WV (SW) = 44 ft WV (SE) = 9 ft 136 J-JAH-E Jade Drive Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int WV (W) = 48 ft WV (NW) = 9 ft 137 J-MH-W Mineral Drive Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int FH (NE) = 3 ft MH (E) = 22 ft 138 J-MH-N Mineral Drive Highway 72 6 N. Center of Int FH (SW) = 20 ft WV (SE) = 14 ft 139 J-MH-E Mineral Drive Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int FH (NW) = 15 ft WV (NW) = 14 ft 140 J-M-W Mineral Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 3 Lot 5 MH (NW) = 21.7 ft N/A 141 J-M-N Mineral Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 3 Lot 8 MH (N) = 15 ft WV (W) = 8 ft 142 J-M-W2 Mineral Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 3 Lot 8 WV (E) = 8 ft WV (SE) = 15 ft 143 J-M-S Mineral Drive N/A 6 Midblock - Block 3 Lot 8 WV (N) = 14.6 ft WV (NW) = 15 ft 144 J-FH Fossil Court Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int PP (SW) = 23 ft N/A 145 J-MIH Mica Drive Highway 72 6 N. Center of Int PP (SW) = 25 ft MH (SW) = 12 ft

146 J-MI Mica Drive N/A 6 North Edge of Cul de Sac FH (W) = 3 ft N/A 147 J-CH-E Chromite Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int FH (N) = 2 ft N/A 148 J-CH-W Chromite Highway 72 6 N. Center of Int FH (E) = 30.5 ft N/A 149 J-C Chromite N/A 6 NE. of Cul de Sac (FH Lead) FH (NE) = 2 ft N/A 150 J-MAH-E Marble Court Highway 72 6 NE. Center of Int FH (N) = 4 ft N/A 151 J-MAH-W Marble Court Highway 72 6 NE. Center of Int FH (E) = 21 ft PP (SW) = 41 ft 152 J-MB-N Mineral Drive Bismuth Drive ? N. Center of Int SL (S) = 65 ft FH (W) = 24 ft 153 J-MB-W Mineral Drive Bismuth Drive 6 W. Center of Int SL (SE) = 18 ft WV (NE) = 7 ft 154 J-MB-S Mineral Drive Bismuth Drive 6 N. Center of Int SL (S) = 20 ft WV (SW) = 7 ft 155 J-B Bismuth Drive N/A 6 North End of Street - Lot 1 PP (NE) = 5 ft Curb (E) = 4 ft 156 J-FEH-W Feldspar Highway 72 6 NW. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (W) = 20 ft PP (SW) = 25 ft 157 J-FEH-E Feldspar Highway 72 6 NW. Center of Int PP (SW) = 24.8 ft N/A 158 J-H-FE/T-W N/A Highway 72 6 Midblock Between Feldspar and Tungston PP (NW) = 61 ft N/A 159 J-H-FE/T-E N/A Highway 72 8 Midblock Between Feldspar and Tungston PP (W) = 59 ft N/A 160 J-H-FE/T-S N/A Highway 72 8 Midblock Between Feldspar and Tungston N/A N/A 161 J-MFE Mineral Drive Feldspar 6 N. Center of Int FH (W) = 4 ft N/A 162 J-TH-W Tungston Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int PP (SE) = 23 ft N/A 163 J-TH-E Tungston Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int FH (E) = 20 ft N/A 164 J-MT Mineral Drive Tungston 6 N. Center of Int FH (E) = 4 ft N/A 165 J-H-T/BE N/A Highway 72 8 Midblock Between Tungston and Beryl N/A (Alley) N/A 166 J-BEH Beryl Drive Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int FH (N) = 4 ft N/A 167 J-BE-N Beryl Drive N/A ? East End of Hanna Family Housing FH (N) = 3 ft N/A 168 J-RH-N Rec Center Highway 72 ? NE. Corner of Rec Center SL (SW) = 61 ft FH (SW) = 49 ft 169 J-RH-S Rec Center Highway 72 ? NE Corner of Rec Center SL (NW) = 41 ft FH (NW) = 27 ft 170 J-RH-E Rec Center Highway 72 ? NE. Corner of Rec Center Flag Pole (SW) = 36 ft NW Memorial Corner (SE) = 19 ft 171 J-FE-S Feldspar N/A 6 Midblock - North side of Block NE Prop. Corner Lot 23 (W) = 32.9 ft WV (NE) = 25 ft 172 J-FE-N Feldspar N/A 6 Midblock - North side of Block NE Prop. Corner Lot 23 (N) = 17.6 ft WV (SW) = 25 ft 173 J-FET-S Feldspar Tungston 6 NW. Corner Lot 34 Large Telephone Pedestal (SW) = 41 ft Small Telephone Pedestal (S) = 29 ft 174 J-FET-N Feldspar Tungston 6 NW Corner Lot 34 Large Telephone Pedestal (SW) = 49 ft Small Telephone Pedestal (SW) = 35 ft 175 J-T N/A Tungston 6 NE. Corner Lot 35 Gas Meter (SW) = 79 ft NE Corner Post Lot 35 (SW) = 20.7 ft 176 J-BE-S N/A Beryl Drive 8 NW. Corner Block 9 Lot 1 SL (SE) = 65 ft FH (E) = 20 ft

177 J-BE-W N/A Beryl Drive 6 West of Cul de Sac SW Building Corner (NE) = 62.6 ft NW Building Corner (SE) = 59 ft 178 J-SH-W2 Silver Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int FH (NE) = 33 ft N/A 179 J-SH-W2 Silver Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (N) = 2.5 ft N/A 180 J-GH-W Gold Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int N/A N/A 181 J-GH-E Gold Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (N) = 2.5 ft N/A 182 J-SH-S Silver Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int WV (N) = 13.5 ft N/A 183 J-SH-N Silver Highway 72 8 NW. Center of Int WV (E) = 10.5 ft WV (S) = 13.5 ft 184 J-SH-E Silver Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (N) = 2.5 ft WV (W) = 10.5 ft 185 J-COH-N Copper Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int FH (E) = 15.7 ft N/A 186 J-COH-S Copper Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int FH (N) = 13 ft N/A 187 J-SCH-N Scoria Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (N) = 2.5 ft N/A 188 J-SCH-S Scoria Highway 72 2 SE. Center of Int N/A N/A 189 J-LH-W Limestone Highway 72 8 N. Center of Int FH (E) = 28.5 ft N/A 190 J-LH-E Limestone Highway 72 8 NE. Center of Int FH (N) = 2.5 ft N/A 191 E-N1-W First Street No Name Street 8 W. Center of Int Property Corner Lot 32 (NW) = 21.5 ft N/A 192 E-N1-N First Street No Name Street 6 NE Center of Int FH (NW) = 8.5 ft PP (NW) = 11 ft 193 E-N1-W2 First Street No Name Street 4 NE. Center of Int PP (NE) = 12.8 ft WV (E) = 12.8 ft 194 E-N1-E First Street No Name Street 6 E. Center of Int WV (NE) = 4.6 ft WV (SW) = 4 ft 195 E-N1-S First Street No Name Street 4 SE. Center of Int WV (NW) = 4 ft WV (NE) = 13.3 ft 196 E-E1-N First Street East Avenue 6 NE. Center of Int FH (NE) = 6 ft WV (S) = 5 ft 197 E-E1-S First Street East Avenue 6 NE. Center of Int PP (NE) = 11 ft WV (N) = 5 ft 198 E-N-1/2 No Name Alley B/T First and Second 4 Alley Between First and Second PP (SE) = 7.7 ft PP (SW) = 35.5 ft 199 E-W-1/2 West Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 4 Alley Between First and Second PP (SW) = 33.8 ft N/A 200 E-N2 Second Street No Name Street 8 W. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (W) = 2 ft N/A 201 E-E-1/2-N East Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 6 Midblock Between First and Second PP (SW) = 39 ft WV (SE) = 4.8 ft 202 E-E-1/2-E East Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 6 Midblock Between First and Second PP (SW) = 41 ft WV (NW) = 4.8 ft 203 E-E-1/2-S East Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 6 Midblock Between First and Second PP (W) = 38 ft WV (NE) = 4 ft 204 E-E-1/2-W East Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 6 Midblock Between First and Second PP (SW) 34 ft Concrete Wall (NE) = 40 ft 205 E-W-1/2-W West Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 4 Midblock Between First and Second Building Corner (SW) = 18 ft WV (E) = 24 ft 206 E-W-1/2-S West Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 6 Midblock Between First and Second PP (SW) = 31.6 ft WV (NE) = 3 ft 207 E-W-1/2-N West Ave. Alley B/T First and Second 6 Midblock Between First and Second PP (SW) = 35.4 ft Fence Corner (NW) = 43.4 ft

208 E-W1-N First Street West Avenue 6 NW. Center of Int FH (SW) = 13 ft PP (SW) = 36 ft 209 E-W1-S First Street West Avenue 6 NW. Center of Int PP (SW) = 8 ft WV (NE) = 3 ft 210 E-W-2/3-W West Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 2 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SW) = 8.4 ft Garage Corner (SE) = 35.5 ft 211 E-W-2/3-E West Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 2 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SW) = 35.2 ft Garage Corner (SE) = 9.9 ft 212 E-W-2/3-N West Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 2 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SE) = 38.7 ft N/A 213 E-?-1/2-S Rosebud/East Alley B/T First and Second 6 East End Block 3 Between First and Second FH ( S) = 4 ft End of Fence (SE) = 7 ft 214 E-?-1/2-N Rosebud/East Alley B/T First and Second 8 East End Block 3 Between First and Second FH (SW) = 6 ft End of Fence (SE) = 7.3 ft 215 E-R-2/3-N N/A Rosebud Avenue 6 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SW) = 40.6 ft PP (SE) = 12.5 ft 216 E-R-2/3-S N/A Rosebud Avenue 8 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (W) = 43.5 ft PP (E) = 7.5 ft 217 E-R3-S Third Street Rosebud Avenue 6 SW. Center of Int FH (W) = 3.4 ft Fence Corner (NW) = 57.2 ft 218 E-R3-N Third Street Rosebud Avenue 8 SW. Center of Int FH (SW) = 5.5 ft Fence Corner (NW) = 56 ft 219 E-N3-S Third Street No Name Street 6 SW. Center of Int FH (W) = 2.5 ft N/A 220 E-N3-E Third Street No Name Street 8 NW. Center of Int FH (SW) = 66 ft PP (SE) = 72 ft 221 E-N3-W Third Street No Name Street 8 NW. Center of Int FH (SW) = 64 ft PP (SE) = 75.5 ft 222 E-N3-N Third Street No Name Street 8 NW. Center of Int FH (SW) = 70 ft PP (SE) = 77 ft Alley B/T Third and Fourth 223 E-N-3/4 No Name St. 4 Midblock Between Third and Fourth 3rd Street FH (SW) = 156 ft 4th Street FH (NW) = 160 ft 224 E-N4 Fourth Street No Name Street 6 NE. Center of Int FH (W) = 2.5 ft N/A 225 E-N-4/5 No Name Alley b/t Fourth and Fifth St. 4 Midblock Between Fourth and Fifth PP (SE) = 61 ft Property Corner (SE) = 31.5 ft 226 E-N5-W Fifth Street No Name Street 8 NW. Center of Int FH (E) = 34 ft PP (SE) = 48 ft 227 E-N5-E Fifth Street No Name Street 6 E. Center of Int FH (N) = 7.5 ft N/A 228 E-W5-N Fifth Street West Avenue 6 NE. Center of Int FH (NW) = 28 ft Gas Meter (NE) = 60 ft 229 E-W5-E Fifth Street West Avenue 8 NE. Center of Int FH (NW) = 32 ft Gas Meter (NE) = 63.5 ft 230 E-W5-S Fifth Street West Avenue 6 NE. Center of Int FH (NW) = 28 ft Gas Meter (NE) = 69 ft 231 E-E5-W Fifth Street East Avenue 6 W. Center of Int PP (N) = 33.5 ft FH (SW) = 21.3 ft 232 E-E5-S Fifth Street East Avenue 8 S. Center of Int PP (NE) = 39.6 ft FH (SW) = 20.7 ft 233 E-E5-E Fifth Street East Avenue 6 N. of Fifth Street - Midblock PP (NW) = 60 ft Gas Meter (E) = 59.5 ft 234 E-E5-N Fifth Street East Avenue 4 N. of Fifth Street - Midblock PP (NW) = 14.5 ft Gas Meter (SE) = 61 ft 235 E-E-4/5-N East Ave. Alley b/t Fourth and Fifth St. 6 Midblock Between Fourth and Fifth PP (SW) = 14.5 ft Gas Meter (SE) = 74 ft 236 E-E-4/5-W East Ave. Alley b/t Fourth and Fifth St. 6 Midblock Between Fourth and Fifth PP (W) = 12 ft Gas Meter (E) = 72.7 ft 237 E-E-4/5-S East Ave. Alley b/t Fourth and Fifth St. 4 Midblock Between Fourth and Fifth PP (SW) = 12.6 ft Gas Meter (E) = 74.3 ft

238 E-E-4/5-E East Ave. Alley b/t Fourth and Fifth St. 4 Midblock Between Fourth and Fifth PP (SW) = 14.7 ft Gas Meter (E) = 71 ft 239 E-E4-E Fourth Street East Avenue 4 SE. Center of Int FH (SW) = 38.6 ft Chain Link Fence Corner (E) = 53.4 ft 240 E-E4-W Fourth Street East Avenue 6 SW. Center of Int FH (W) = 14 ft N/A Alley B/T Third and Fourth 241 E-E-3/4-W East Ave. St. 4 Midblock Between Third and Fourth PP (NW) = 24.2 ft NE Fence Corner (SW) = 57.6 ft Alley B/T Third and Fourth 242 E-E-3/4-N East Ave. St. 6 Midblock Between Third and Fourth PP (SW) = 25.5 ft NE Fence Corner (SW) = 61.7 ft Alley B/T Third and Fourth 243 E-E-3/4-E East Ave. St. 4 Midblock Between Third and Fourth PP (NW) = 27.5 ft NE Fence Corner (SW) = 58.8 ft Alley B/T Third and Fourth 244 E-E-3/4-S East Ave. St. 6 Midblock Between Third and Fourth PP (NW) = 26.8 ft NE Fence Corner (SW) = 54.6 ft 245 E-E3-N Third Street East Avenue 6 NW Center of Int Old Valve N/A 246 E-E3-S Third Street East Avenue 6 SW. Center of Int FH (W) = 2 ft N/A 247 E-E-2/3-W2 East Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 6 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SW) = 26.5 ft SW Fence Corner (NE) = 31.8 ft 248 E-E-2/3-E East Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 2 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SW) = 26.8 ft SW Fence Corner (NE) = 31 ft 249 E-E-2/3-S East Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 6 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SW) = 24 ft SW Fence Corner (NE) = 34.3 ft 250 E-E-2/3-N East Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 2 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SW) = 23.8 ft SW Fence Corner (NE) = 33.8 ft 251 E-E-2/3-W East Ave. Alley b/t Second and Third 2 Midblock Between Second and Third PP (SE) = 10 ft WV (E) = 28 ft 252 E-E2-S Second Street East Avenue 6 S. Center of Int FH (SW) = 31 ft NW Fence Corner (SE) = 19.8 ft 253 E-E2-E Second Street East Avenue 8 SE. Center of Int FH (SW) = 33 ft NW Fence Corner (SE) = 16.2 ft 254 E-E2-W Second Street East Avenue 8 SW. Center of Int FH (SW) = 28.3 ft NW Fence Corner (SE) = 19 ft ? Alley B/T Third and Fourth 255 E-?-3/4-S (Rosebud/East) St. 6 East End Block 9 Between Third and Fourth FH (NE) = 7.8 ft PP (E) = 33.6 ft ? Alley B/T Third and Fourth 256 E-?-3/4-N (Rosebud/East) St. 6 East End Block 9 Between Third and Fourth FH (N) = 6 ft PP (SE) = 31.1 ft 257 E-?5 Fifth Street ? (b/t Rosebud and East) 6 East End Block 10 FH (S) = 19.7 ft PP (SE) = 24.3 ft 258 E-R-S Rosebud Ave. N/A 8 Block 1 Between Lots 4 and 5 PP (SE) = 16.5 ft WV (N) = 4.4 ft 259 E-R-N2 Rosebud Ave. N/A 8 Block 1 Between Lots 4 and 5 PP (SE) = 20.5 ft WV (S) = 4.4 ft 260 E-R-3/5-N Rosebud Ave. N/A 6 Midblock Between Third and Fifth PP (W) = 7.5 ft SW Building Corner (SE) = 72.7 ft 261 E-R-3/5-S Rosebud Ave. N/A 6 Midblock Between Third and Fifth PP (NW) = 44 ft FH (S) = 60.3 ft 262 E-R5-W Fifth Street Rosebud Avenue 8 SW. Center of Int FH (NE) = 40.6 ft NE Garage Corner (SW) = 51.6 ft 263 E-R5-E Fifth Street Rosebud Avenue 8 SW. Center of Int FH (NE) = 42 ft NE Garage Corner (SW) = 53.1 ft 264 E-R5-N Fifth Street Rosebud Avenue 4 SW. Center of Int FH (NE) = 39 ft NE Garage Corner (SW) = 58.3 ft 265 E-R-N Rosebud Ave. N/A 4 North of Fifth Street FH (S) = 71.5 ft N/A 266 MV-SA-1 South Adams Street 10 North of North Tipperary Street End of Concrete Drainage (SW) = 32 ft PP @ NE Corner of Parking (S) = 84.25 ft

267 MV-SA-2 South Adams Street 4 East of Roadway FH (SE) = 80 ft Top End of Box Culvert (NE) = 75.5 ft 268 MV-SA-3 South Adams Street 6 FH Lead West of Roadway South of Railroad Tracks NE of Block 1 (First) 269 MV-SA-4 South Adams Street 10 West of Roadway South of Railroad Tracks NE of Block 1 (First) 270 MV-SC-1 South Clark Street 10 South Clark Street Extended North South of Railroad Tracks West of South Adams Street 271 MV-SC-2 South Clark Street 10 South Clark Street Extended North South of Railroad Tracks West of South Adams Street 272 MV-SC-3 South Clark Street 10 South Clark Street Extended North South of Railroad Tracks West of South Adams Street

273 MV-SA-5 South Adams Street 4 North of North Tipperary Street End of Concrete Drainage (SW) = 30 ft PP @ NE Corner of Parking Lot (S) = 83 ft South 5th 274 MV-S5SJ Street South Jefferson Street 6 E. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (E) = 1 ft N/A Mountain 275 MV-MVSA View South Adams Street 6 SW. Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (N) = 1 ft N/A Mountain 276 MV-MVSA View South Adams Street 6 NE Center of Int (FH Lead) FH (SW) = 1 ft N/A 277 MV-NT-N N/A North Tipperary Street 6 Block 4 Lot 8 (FH Lead) FH (NW) = 1 ft N/A 278 MV-NT-S N/A North Tipperary Street 6 Block 4 Lot 8 FH (N) = 52 ft N/A South 3rd 279 MV-S3-W Street Alley 8 Midblock (Block 3) WV (E) = 2 ft N/A South 3rd 280 MV-S3-E Street Alley 8 Midblock (Block 3) (FH Lead) FH (N) = 3 ft N/A O-MA-H/T- 281 N Madison Street N/A 4 Midblock Between HWY 72 and Taccalone PP (E) = 32.4 ft Curb Stop (N) = 21 ft O-MA-H/T- 282 S Madison Street N/A 4 Midblock Between HWY 72 and Taccalone PP (SE) = 37 ft N/A 283 O-4MA 4th Street Madison Street 2 SW. Center of Int N/A N/A O-MA-4/5- 284 W Madison Street N/A 2 Midblock Between 4th and 5th PP (SE) = 6 ft WV (E) = 30 ft 285 O-MA-4/5-E Madison Street N/A 2 Midblock Between 4th and 5th PP (SW) = 25 ft WV (W) = 30 ft 286 O-5MA 5th Street Madison Street 4 E. Center of Int FH (N) = 8.5 ft N/A

APPENDIX B

PROJECT COST APPROXIMATIONS AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DRAWINGS

4TH STREET EAST (1)

ESTIMATED TOTAL UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2$ 1,000 $ 2,000 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2$ 500 $ 1,000 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 50$ 80 $ 4,000 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1463$ 54 $ 79,002 6" GATE VALVE EA 7$ 1,500 $ 10,500 8” GATE VALVE EA 1$ 1,900 $ 1,900 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 8$ 800 $ 6,400 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 4$ 950 $ 3,800 8"X6" DIP TEE EA 1$ 1,050 $ 1,050 DIP BEND EA 2$ 750 $ 1,500 FIRE HYDRANT EA 2$ 5,000 $ 10,000 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 560$ 24 $ 13,440 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 16$ 1,300 $ 20,800 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 5$ 1,500 $ 7,500 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 1947$ 14 $ 26,285 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1$ 1,000 $ 1,000 MOBILIZATION $ 19,018 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1)$ 209,194

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $20,919.42 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 20,919

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $20,919.42 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $230,113.57 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $34,517.03 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 264,631

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 285,550

4TH STREET WEST DISTRIBUTION (2) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1540 $54.00 $83,160.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 7 $800.00 $5,600.00 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 3 $950.00 $2,850.00 10"X6" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 51 $13.50 $688.50 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 MOBILIZATION $11,028.45 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $122,538.35

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $12,253.84 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2) $12,253.84

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $12,253.84 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $134,792.19 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $20,218.83 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4) $155,011.01

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4) $167,264.85

FRONT STREET EAST DISTRIBUTION (3) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 50 $80.00 $4,000.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1948 $54.00 $105,192.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 9 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 2 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 11 $800.00 $8,800.00 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 4 $950.00 $3,800.00 10" DIP CROSS EA 1 $750.00 $750.00 DIP REDUCER EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 175 $24.00 $4,200.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 5 $1,300.00 $6,500.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 2600 $13.50 $35,100.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 21,044 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $231,486.20

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $23,148.62 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 23,149

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $23,148.62 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $254,634.82 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $38,195.22 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 292,830

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 315,979

FRONT STREET WEST DISTRIBUTION (4) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 25 $80.00 $2,000.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 836 $54.00 $45,144.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 6 $800.00 $4,800.00 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 4 $950.00 $3,800.00 DIP REDUCER EA 1 $400.00 $400.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 140 $24.00 $3,360.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 4 $1,300.00 $5,200.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 1120 $13.50 $15,120.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 10,882 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $119,706.40

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $11,970.64 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 11,971

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $11,970.64 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $131,677.04 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $19,751.56 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 151,429

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 163,399

OLD TOWN SOUTH DISTRIBUTION (5) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 6 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 150 $80.00 $12,000.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1442 $54.00 $77,868.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 12 $1,500.00 $18,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 13 $800.00 $10,400.00 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 5 $950.00 $4,750.00 10"X6" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 DIP BEND EA 1 $750.00 $750.00 6"X6" DIP CROSS EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 3 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 450 $24.00 $10,800.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 15 $1,300.00 $19,500.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 1922 $13.50 $25,947.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 6 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 22,422 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $246,636.50

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $24,663.65 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 24,664

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $24,663.65 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $271,300.15 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $40,695.02 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 311,995

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 336,659

OLD TOWN EAST DISTRIBUTION (6) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 150 $80.00 $12,000.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 2022 $54.00 $109,188.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 13 $1,500.00 $19,500.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 14 $800.00 $11,200.00 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 9 $950.00 $8,550.00 10" DIP CROSS EA 1 $750.00 $750.00 DIP BEND EA 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 DIP REDUCER EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 6 $5,000.00 $30,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE EA 390 $24.00 $9,360.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 13 $1,300.00 $16,900.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 2696 $13.50 $36,396.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 27,754 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $305,298.40

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $30,529.84 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 30,530

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $30,529.84 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $335,828.24 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $50,374.24 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 386,202

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 416,732

OLD TOWN WEST DISTRIBUTION (7) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 75 $80.00 $6,000.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1111 $54.00 $59,994.00 12" GATE VALVE EA 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 13 $1,500.00 $19,500.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 14 $800.00 $11,200.00 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 5 $950.00 $4,750.00 12"X6" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 140 $24.00 $3,360.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 7 $1,300.00 $9,100.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 1481 $13.50 $19,993.50 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 16,130 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $177,427.25

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $17,742.73 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 17,743

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $17,742.73 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $195,169.98 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $29,275.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 224,445

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 242,188

OLD TOWN DISTRIBUTION (8) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 5 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 250 $80.00 $20,000.00 12" PVC WATER MAIN LF 818 $95.00 $77,710.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1744 $54.00 $94,176.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 4 $800.00 $3,200.00 6"X6" DIP TEE EA 3 $950.00 $2,850.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 630 $24.00 $15,120.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 21 $1,300.00 $27,300.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 2325 $13.50 $31,387.50 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 29,774 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $327,517.85

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $32,751.79 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 32,752

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $32,751.79 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $360,269.64 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $54,040.45 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 414,310

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 447,062

OLD TOWN TRANSMISSION (9) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 5 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 250 $80.00 $20,000.00 12" PVC WATER MAIN LF 4304 $95.00 $408,880.00 12" GATE VALVE EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 12" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 DIP BEND EA 3 $750.00 $2,250.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SY 2466 $13.50 $33,291.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 48,872 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $537,593.10

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $53,759.31 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 53,759

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $53,759.31 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $591,352.41 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $88,702.86 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 680,055

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 733,815

SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET TRANSMISSION (10) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1169 $75.00 $87,675.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 2 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 10" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 DIP BEND EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 1 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 70 $24.00 $1,680.00 MOBILIZATION $ 10,596 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $116,550.50

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $11,655.05 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 11,655

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $11,655.05 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $128,205.55 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $19,230.83 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 147,436

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 159,091

SOUTH WEST TRANSMISSION (11) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 25 $80.00 $2,000.00 12" PVC WATER MAIN LF 2400 $95.00 $228,000.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 DIP BEND EA 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 23,900 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $262,900.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $26,290.00 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 26,290

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $26,290.00 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $289,190.00 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $43,378.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 332,569

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 358,859

SOUTH 3RD TRANSMISSION (12) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 25 $80.00 $2,000.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1440 $75.00 $108,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1447 $65.00 $94,055.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 3 $2,400.00 $7,200.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 4 $1,900.00 $7,600.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 11 $800.00 $8,800.00 10"X6" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 10"X8" DIP TEE EA 2 $1,100.00 $2,200.00 8"X6" DIP TEE EA 3 $1,050.00 $3,150.00 DIP BEND EA 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 DIP REDUCER EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 100 $24.00 $2,400.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 5 $1,300.00 $6,500.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 4" PAVEMENT STREET PATCH SY 383 $48.00 $18,384.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 8" DIRECTIONAL DRILL LF 50 $200.00 $10,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 30,219 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $332,407.90

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $33,240.79 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 33,241

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $33,240.79 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $365,648.69 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $54,847.30 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 420,496

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 453,737

WEST RR CROSSING TRANSMISSION (13) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 25 $80.00 $2,000.00 12" PVC WATER MAIN LF 450 $95.00 $42,750.00 12" GATE VALVE EA 3 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 3 $800.00 $2,400.00 12" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 DIP BEND EA 1 $750.00 $750.00 DIP REDUCER EA 1 $400.00 $400.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 4" COMPACTED ROAD BASE SY 31 $13.50 $418.50 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 6,642 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $73,060.35

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $7,306.04 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 7,306

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $7,306.04 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $80,366.39 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $12,054.96 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 92,421

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 99,727

SOUTH TRANSMISSION (14) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 12" PVC WATER MAIN LF 3314 $95.00 $314,830.00 12" GATE VALVE EA 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 1 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 12"X8" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 MOBILIZATION $ 33,343 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $366,773.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $36,677.30 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 36,677

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $36,677.30 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $403,450.30 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $60,517.55 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 463,968

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 500,645

SOUTH EAST TRANSMISSION LOOP (15) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 100 $80.00 $8,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 5088 $65.00 $330,720.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 2 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 4 $800.00 $3,200.00 10" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 8" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 DIP BEND LF 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 DIP REDUCER EA 1 $400.00 $400.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 36,402 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $400,422.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $40,042.20 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 40,042

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $40,042.20 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $440,464.20 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $66,069.63 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 506,534

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 546,576

EAST TRANSMISSION LOOP (16) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 75 $80.00 $6,000.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1550 $75.00 $116,250.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 2 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 4 $800.00 $3,200.00 10" DIP TEE EA 2 $1,400.00 $2,800.00 DIP BEND LF 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 DIP REDUCER EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 10" DIRECTIONAL DRILL LF 149 $200.00 $29,800.00 MOBILIZATION $ 17,945 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $197,395.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $19,739.50 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 19,740

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $19,739.50 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $217,134.50 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $32,570.18 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 249,705

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 269,444

STATE HIGHWAY TRANSMISSION (17) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 200 $80.00 $16,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 6093 $65.00 $396,045.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 10 $1,900.00 $19,000.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 10 $1,500.00 $15,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 20 $800.00 $16,000.00 8"X6" DIP TEE EA 10 $1,050.00 $10,500.00 DIP BEND EA 3 $750.00 $2,250.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 12 $1,500.00 $18,000.00 4" PAVEMENT STREET PATCH SY 442 $48.00 $21,216.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 5 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 8" DIRECTIONAL DRILL LF 100 $200.00 $20,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 54,501 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $599,512.10

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $59,951.21 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 59,951

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $59,951.21 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $659,463.31 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $98,919.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 758,383

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 818,334

SOUTH TANK LOOP TRANSMISSION (18) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 2483 $75.00 $186,225.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 6 $2,400.00 $14,400.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 9 $800.00 $7,200.00 10" DIP CROSS EA 1 $750.00 $750.00 DIP REDUCER EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 DIP BEND EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 10"X6" DIP TEE EA 3 $1,100.00 $3,300.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 140 $54.00 $7,560.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 MOBILIZATION $ 23,824 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $262,058.50

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $26,205.85 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION $0.00 LEGAL FEES $1,000.00 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY $5,000.00 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 32,206

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $26,205.85 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $288,264.35 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $43,239.65 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 331,504

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 363,710

NORTH TANK LOOP TRANSMISSION (19) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 3000 $75.00 $225,000.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 3 $2,400.00 $7,200.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 5 $800.00 $4,000.00 10" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 DIP BEND EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 10"X6" TEE EA 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 6' GATE VALVE EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 4' PAVEMENT STREET PATH SY 40 $48.00 $1,920.00 MOBILIZATION $ 25,412 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $279,532.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS 27,953.20 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0.00 LEGAL FEES 1,000.00 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 5,000.00 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 33,953

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $27,953.20 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $307,485.20 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $46,122.78 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 353,608

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 387,561

TANK LOOP EAST TRANSMISSION (20) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1708 $75.00 $128,100.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 2 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 10" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 DIP BEND EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 4" PAVEMENT STREET PATCH SY 40 $48.00 $1,920.00 MOBILIZATION $ 14,582 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $160,402.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $16,040.20 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 16,040

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $16,040.20 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $176,442.20 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $26,466.33 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 202,909

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 218,949

TANK TRANSMISSION (21) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 790 $75.00 $59,250.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 6,375 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $70,125.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $7,012.50 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 7,013

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $7,012.50 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $77,137.50 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $11,570.63 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 88,708

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 95,721

TANK LOOP WEST TRANSMISSION (22) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 50 $80.00 $4,000.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 2606 $75.00 $195,450.00 10" GATE VALVE EA 5 $2,400.00 $12,000.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 1 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 7 $800.00 $5,600.00 10"X6" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 10"X8" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 10" DIP TEE EA 2 $1,400.00 $2,800.00 DIP BEND EA 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 40 $24.00 $960.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 1 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 5 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 4" PAVEMENT STREET PATCH SY 920 $48.00 $44,160.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 29,087 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $319,957.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $31,995.70 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 31,996

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $31,995.70 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $351,952.70 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $52,792.91 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 404,746

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 436,741

NORTH JEFFERSON TRANSMISSION (23) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 175 $80.00 $14,000.00 10" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1809 $75.00 $135,675.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 10"X6" DIP TEE EA 2 $1,100.00 $2,200.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 420 $24.00 $10,080.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 12 $1,300.00 $15,600.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 PLANT MIX PAVEMENT SY 2412 $18.00 $43,416.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 10" DIRECTIONAL DRILL LF 100 $200.00 $20,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 26,857 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $295,428.10

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $29,542.81 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 29,543

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $29,542.81 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $324,970.91 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $48,745.64 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 373,717

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 403,259

WEST ELMO TRANSMISSION (24) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 100 $80.00 $8,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1298 $65.00 $84,370.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 14 $1,900.00 $26,600.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 14 $800.00 $11,200.00 8" DIP TEE EA 6 $1,200.00 $7,200.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 11 $1,500.00 $16,500.00 4" COMPACTED ROAD BASE SY 1543 $13.50 $20,830.50 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 8"X6" DIP TEE EA 4 $1,050.00 $4,200.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 DIP REDUCER EA 5 $400.00 $2,000.00 DIP BEND EA 3 $750.00 $2,250.00 FIRE HYDRANT EA 3 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 20,915 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $230,065.55

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $23,006.56 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 23,007

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $23,006.56 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $253,072.11 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $37,960.82 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 291,033

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 314,039

EAST AVENUE TRANSMISSION (25) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 100 $80.00 $8,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 818 $65.00 $53,170.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 4 $1,900.00 $7,600.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 6 $800.00 $4,800.00 8" DIP CROSS EA 2 $650.00 $1,300.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 8 $1,500.00 $12,000.00 4" PAVEMENT STREET PATCH SY 1090 $48.00 $52,320.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 DIP REDUCER EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 4" GATE VALVE EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 MOBILIZATION $ 14,739 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $162,129.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $16,212.90 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 16,213

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $16,212.90 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $178,341.90 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $26,751.29 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 205,093

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 221,306

FIFTH STREET ALLEY DISTRIBUTION (26) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 50 $80.00 $4,000.00 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1589 $54.00 $85,806.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 2 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 5 $800.00 $4,000.00 8" DIP TEE EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 DIP BEND EA 1 $750.00 $750.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 245 $24.00 $5,880.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 7 $1,300.00 $9,100.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 4" COMPACTED ROAD BASE SY 44 $13.50 $594.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 6" GATE VALVE EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 6" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 13,183 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $145,013.00

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $14,501.30 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 14,501

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $14,501.30 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $159,514.30 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $23,927.15 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 183,441

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 197,943

THIRD STREET ALLEY DISTRIBUTION (27) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 50 $80.00 $4,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1472 $65.00 $95,680.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 6 $1,900.00 $11,400.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 10 $800.00 $8,000.00 8" DIP TEE EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 8" DIP CROSS EA 2 $650.00 $1,300.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 385 $24.00 $9,240.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 11 $1,300.00 $14,300.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 4" PAVEMENT STREET PATCH SY 111 $48.00 $5,328.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 4" GATE VALVE EA 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 DIP REDUCER EA 4 $400.00 $1,600.00 MOBILIZATION $ 17,135 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $188,482.80

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $18,848.28 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 18,848

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $18,848.28 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $207,331.08 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $31,099.66 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 238,431

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 257,279

FIRST STREET ALLEY DISTRIBUTION (28) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 50 $80.00 $4,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 2164 $65.00 $140,660.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 12 $1,900.00 $22,800.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 13 $800.00 $10,400.00 8" DIP CROSS EA 3 $650.00 $1,950.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 350 $24.00 $8,400.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 10 $1,300.00 $13,000.00 4" PAVEMENT STREET PATCH SY 491 $48.00 $23,568.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 10 $1,500.00 $15,000.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 4" GATE VALVE EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 DIP REDUCER EA 3 $400.00 $1,200.00 8" DIP TEE EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 MOBILIZATION $ 24,708 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $271,785.80

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $27,178.58 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 27,179

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $27,178.58 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $298,964.38 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $44,844.66 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 343,809

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 370,988

ROSEBUD AVENUE DISTRIBUTION (29) TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE UTILITY LOCATES LS 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 CEMENT TREATED FILL CY 150 $80.00 $12,000.00 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1485 $65.00 $96,525.00 8” GATE VALVE EA 6 $1,900.00 $11,400.00 INSTALL/ADJUST VALVE BOX W/CONCRETE COLLAR EA 6 $800.00 $4,800.00 8" DIP TEE EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 DIP BEND EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 1" POLY WATER SERVICE LF 245 $24.00 $5,880.00 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION EA 7 $1,300.00 $9,100.00 PLANT MIX PAVEMENT SY 1060 $18.00 $19,080.00 WATER MAIN CONNECTION SY 5 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 MOBILIZATION $ 17,789 TOTALS TOTAL COMPONENT COST (SUBTOTAL #1) $195,673.50

PREPARATION OF FINAL DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS $19,567.35 PERMITTING AND MITIGATION 0 LEGAL FEES 0 ACQUISITION OF ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY 0 PRE‐CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #2)$ 19,567

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #1X10%) $19,567.35 COMPONENTS AND ENGINEERING (SUBTOTAL #3) $215,240.85 CONTINGENCY (SUBTOTAL #3X15%) $32,286.13 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (SUBTOTAL #4)$ 247,527

TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (SUBTOTAL #2 + SUBTOTAL #4)$ 267,094

APPENDIX C

WATER MODEL JUNCTION TABLE

Junction FlexTable: Fire Flow

Current Time: 0.000 hours

Label Demand Satisfies Fire Fire Flow Pressure Pressure Elevation Hydraulic Grade (gpm) Flow (Available) (psi) (Calculated (ft) (ft) Constraints? (gpm) Residual) (psi) J-1 0.00 True 1,500.00 48.3 30.6 6,930.00 7,041.74 J-2 0.00 True 1,500.00 91.6 79.6 6,830.00 7,041.74 J-3 0.00 True 1,058.42 48.3 20.0 6,930.00 7,041.74 J-5 0.00 True 1,500.00 48.5 37.3 6,930.00 7,042.06 J-7 0.00 True 1,500.00 93.8 81.9 6,825.00 7,041.74 J-8 0.00 True 1,500.00 117.6 106.7 6,770.00 7,041.72 J-9 0.00 True 1,500.00 117.6 107.3 6,770.00 7,041.71 J-10 5.00 True 1,500.00 117.6 107.3 6,770.00 7,041.71 J-13 0.00 True 1,394.46 82.9 20.0 6,850.00 7,041.72 J-14 0.00 False 100.51 93.8 20.9 6,825.00 7,041.72 J-15 0.00 True 1,056.28 84.6 20.0 6,846.00 7,041.54 J-16 0.00 True 1,500.00 93.7 45.0 6,825.00 7,041.54 J-17 0.00 True 1,500.00 95.8 58.0 6,820.00 7,041.54 J-18 0.00 False 157.91 89.4 20.0 6,835.00 7,041.54 J-19 0.00 False 118.38 95.8 20.1 6,820.00 7,041.54 J-20 0.00 False 112.95 91.5 20.6 6,830.00 7,041.54 J-23 0.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 79.9 6,790.00 7,041.72 J-24 0.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 81.0 6,790.00 7,041.72 J-25 1.25 True 1,500.00 95.9 62.7 6,820.00 7,041.57 J-26 5.00 True 1,500.00 89.4 53.8 6,835.00 7,041.58 J-27 5.00 True 1,500.00 89.4 40.1 6,835.00 7,041.58 J-28 3.75 True 1,500.00 91.6 64.4 6,830.00 7,041.62 J-29 5.00 True 1,500.00 93.7 64.5 6,825.00 7,041.62 J-30 7.50 True 1,500.00 89.4 72.1 6,835.00 7,041.72 J-32 7.50 True 1,500.00 93.7 44.8 6,825.00 7,041.54 J-33 5.00 True 1,500.00 98.0 55.0 6,815.00 7,041.51 J-34 5.00 True 1,500.00 100.2 41.0 6,810.00 7,041.48 J-36 3.75 False 834.35 100.1 20.0 6,810.00 7,041.32 J-37 3.75 False 800.88 104.4 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.31 J-38 2.50 False 600.16 105.3 20.0 6,798.00 7,041.28 J-39 2.50 False 671.09 100.1 20.0 6,810.00 7,041.32 J-40 5.00 True 1,032.41 106.6 20.0 6,795.00 7,041.46 J-41 3.75 True 1,500.00 104.5 58.7 6,800.00 7,041.52 J-42 5.00 True 1,500.00 104.5 58.5 6,800.00 7,041.53 J-45 2.50 True 1,500.00 104.5 22.3 6,800.00 7,041.53 J-46 2.50 True 1,500.00 100.2 87.7 6,810.00 7,041.69 J-47 5.00 True 1,500.00 98.1 85.7 6,815.00 7,041.69 J-48 2.50 True 1,500.00 106.7 94.5 6,795.00 7,041.69 J-49 2.50 True 1,500.00 115.4 103.5 6,775.00 7,041.69 J-50 7.50 True 1,500.00 115.4 103.8 6,775.00 7,041.70 J-51 2.50 True 1,296.01 100.2 20.0 6,810.00 7,041.65 J-52 7.50 True 1,257.36 85.1 20.0 6,845.00 7,041.65 J-53 5.00 True 1,500.00 100.2 24.1 6,810.00 7,041.65 J-54 2.50 True 1,317.98 95.9 20.0 6,820.00 7,041.65 J-59 7.50 True 1,500.00 109.8 96.4 6,788.00 7,041.69 J-60 5.00 True 1,500.00 110.6 99.1 6,786.00 7,041.72 J-61 1.25 True 1,500.00 105.4 56.5 6,798.00 7,041.69 J-62 1.25 True 1,500.00 104.6 90.7 6,800.00 7,041.72 J-63 0.00 True 1,500.00 100.3 85.9 6,810.00 7,041.72 J-64 0.00 True 1,500.00 100.3 85.6 6,810.00 7,041.72 J-65 1.25 True 1,500.00 100.3 82.4 6,810.00 7,041.72

Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 4) 14-0509 HANNA WATER MODEL-MAX DAY.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.04.58] 6/12/2014 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT Page 1 of 5 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Junction FlexTable: Fire Flow

Current Time: 0.000 hours

Label Demand Satisfies Fire Fire Flow Pressure Pressure Elevation Hydraulic Grade (gpm) Flow (Available) (psi) (Calculated (ft) (ft) Constraints? (gpm) Residual) (psi) J-66 0.00 True 1,500.00 100.3 63.3 6,810.00 7,041.72 J-67 0.00 True 1,500.00 49.3 34.3 6,928.00 7,042.00 J-68 0.00 True 1,500.00 82.9 51.0 6,850.00 7,041.72 J-69 2.50 True 1,500.00 82.9 32.6 6,850.00 7,041.72 J-70 2.50 False 934.17 61.3 20.0 6,900.00 7,041.71 J-71 0.00 True 1,500.00 74.3 35.3 6,870.00 7,041.72 J-72 0.00 True 1,500.00 70.0 27.1 6,880.00 7,041.72 J-73 0.00 True 1,383.17 70.0 20.0 6,880.00 7,041.72 J-74 0.00 True 1,358.11 74.3 20.0 6,870.00 7,041.72 J-75 0.00 False 818.29 61.3 20.0 6,900.00 7,041.72 J-76 0.00 False 858.28 61.3 20.0 6,900.00 7,041.72 J-77 0.00 True 1,500.00 115.4 104.1 6,775.00 7,041.73 J-78 0.00 True 1,500.00 98.1 87.7 6,815.00 7,041.75 J-79 0.00 True 1,500.00 78.6 69.4 6,860.00 7,041.77 J-80 0.00 True 1,500.00 67.8 59.5 6,885.00 7,041.81 J-81 0.00 True 1,500.00 59.2 51.6 6,905.00 7,041.93 J-82 0.00 True 1,500.00 46.0 41.9 6,936.00 7,042.36 J-84 0.00 True 1,500.00 84.4 75.2 6,847.00 7,042.03 J-85 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 92.4 6,780.00 7,041.68 J-86 0.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 90.3 6,790.00 7,041.68 J-87 5.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 91.5 6,790.00 7,041.68 J-88 5.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 91.7 6,790.00 7,041.68 J-89 0.00 True 1,500.00 106.7 90.8 6,795.00 7,041.68 J-90 5.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 93.8 6,790.00 7,041.69 J-91 0.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 93.9 6,790.00 7,041.70 J-92 5.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 95.1 6,790.00 7,041.70 J-93 0.00 True 1,500.00 106.7 93.9 6,795.00 7,041.72 J-94 5.00 True 1,500.00 104.6 91.1 6,800.00 7,041.72 J-95 0.00 True 1,500.00 102.4 86.8 6,805.00 7,041.70 J-96 0.00 True 1,107.81 102.1 68.9 6,805.00 7,041.07 J-97 0.00 True 1,022.37 84.8 51.5 6,845.00 7,040.94 J-98 5.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 80.8 6,790.00 7,041.68 J-99 5.00 True 1,500.00 87.3 68.1 6,840.00 7,041.68 J-100 3.75 True 1,500.00 108.9 86.4 6,790.00 7,041.68 J-101 5.00 True 1,500.00 95.9 79.6 6,820.00 7,041.69 J-102 5.00 True 1,500.00 87.3 59.1 6,840.00 7,041.74 J-103 5.00 True 1,500.00 95.9 72.4 6,820.00 7,041.69 J-104 0.00 True 1,500.00 100.2 76.7 6,810.00 7,041.69 J-105 5.00 True 1,500.00 87.3 33.0 6,840.00 7,041.69 J-106 3.75 True 1,500.00 104.6 79.0 6,800.00 7,041.69 J-107 7.50 True 1,500.00 82.9 27.8 6,850.00 7,041.69 J-108 5.00 True 1,500.00 83.1 73.2 6,850.00 7,042.03 J-109 7.50 True 1,500.00 76.6 66.8 6,865.00 7,042.01 J-110 5.00 True 1,500.00 80.9 70.0 6,855.00 7,042.00 J-111 1.25 False 387.66 102.0 20.0 6,805.00 7,040.86 J-112 7.50 False 613.40 102.0 20.0 6,805.00 7,040.86 J-113 5.00 True 1,012.23 84.8 50.5 6,845.00 7,040.92 J-114 5.00 False 998.71 81.3 45.8 6,853.00 7,040.90 J-115 7.50 False 994.24 80.0 45.3 6,856.00 7,040.89 J-116 5.00 False 986.75 76.1 42.3 6,865.00 7,040.89 J-117 7.50 False 983.40 71.3 29.5 6,876.00 7,040.88

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Junction FlexTable: Fire Flow

Current Time: 0.000 hours

Label Demand Satisfies Fire Fire Flow Pressure Pressure Elevation Hydraulic Grade (gpm) Flow (Available) (psi) (Calculated (ft) (ft) Constraints? (gpm) Residual) (psi) J-118 5.00 False 948.21 57.1 20.0 6,909.00 7,040.88 J-119 7.50 False 849.38 54.5 20.0 6,915.00 7,040.88 J-120 5.00 True 1,003.74 78.3 44.0 6,860.00 7,040.91 J-121 0.00 False 982.85 72.6 38.3 6,873.00 7,040.89 J-122 0.00 False 980.47 80.0 45.4 6,856.00 7,040.89 J-123 5.00 True 1,001.54 78.3 45.0 6,860.00 7,040.91 J-124 7.50 False 990.72 68.7 35.5 6,882.00 7,040.90 J-125 5.00 False 983.65 62.7 29.1 6,896.00 7,040.89 J-126 0.00 False 974.31 62.3 28.7 6,897.00 7,040.89 J-127 5.00 False 965.44 57.9 24.4 6,907.00 7,040.89 J-128 0.00 False 902.94 50.1 20.0 6,925.00 7,040.89 J-129 5.00 False 982.76 74.4 40.3 6,869.00 7,040.89 J-130 0.00 False 979.36 73.1 38.5 6,872.00 7,040.89 J-131 5.00 False 978.08 75.2 40.9 6,867.00 7,040.89 J-132 0.00 False 975.78 68.3 33.5 6,883.00 7,040.89 J-133 5.00 False 976.03 78.3 43.8 6,860.00 7,040.89 J-134 0.00 False 973.03 55.3 20.9 6,913.00 7,040.89 J-135 0.00 False 974.30 56.6 22.2 6,910.00 7,040.89 J-138 5.00 False 965.23 53.6 20.0 6,917.00 7,040.89 J-139 0.00 False 937.60 52.3 20.0 6,920.00 7,040.89 J-140 5.00 False 279.22 33.3 20.0 6,964.00 7,040.88 J-141 0.00 False 882.30 50.6 20.0 6,924.00 7,040.89 J-142 5.00 False 982.94 73.9 36.5 6,870.00 7,040.89 J-143 0.00 False 979.37 80.0 45.5 6,856.00 7,040.89 J-144 3.75 True 1,360.51 70.0 20.0 6,880.00 7,041.82 J-145 3.75 True 1,500.00 61.4 43.9 6,900.00 7,041.91 J-146 3.75 True 1,500.00 61.4 50.3 6,900.00 7,041.93 J-147 3.75 True 1,500.00 59.2 28.3 6,905.00 7,041.91 J-148 3.75 False 790.98 67.8 20.0 6,885.00 7,041.82 J-151 5.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 86.6 6,790.00 7,041.68 J-152 1.25 True 1,500.00 113.2 87.5 6,780.00 7,041.68 J-153 5.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 90.8 6,780.00 7,041.68 J-154 0.00 True 1,500.00 115.4 96.0 6,775.00 7,041.68 J-155 5.00 True 1,500.00 117.5 100.3 6,770.00 7,041.68 J-156 0.00 True 1,500.00 117.6 105.4 6,770.00 7,041.70 J-157 7.50 True 1,500.00 117.5 92.8 6,770.00 7,041.68 J-158 12.50 True 1,500.00 108.5 58.5 6,791.00 7,041.67 J-159 5.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 42.2 6,780.00 7,041.62 J-160 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 64.7 6,780.00 7,041.63 J-161 1.25 True 1,500.00 104.5 44.1 6,800.00 7,041.63 J-162 0.00 True 1,283.78 104.5 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.63 J-163 5.00 False 875.06 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.59 J-164 1.25 False 638.87 108.8 20.0 6,790.00 7,041.58 J-223 3.75 False 728.96 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.58 J-166 5.00 False 906.90 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.61 J-167 0.00 True 1,336.52 108.9 20.0 6,790.00 7,041.62 J-168 5.00 True 1,293.92 104.5 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.62 J-169 0.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 66.2 6,790.00 7,041.65 J-170 0.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 51.4 6,790.00 7,041.65 J-171 5.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 31.3 6,790.00 7,041.65 J-172 5.00 True 1,500.00 78.6 26.6 6,860.00 7,041.68

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Junction FlexTable: Fire Flow

Current Time: 0.000 hours

Label Demand Satisfies Fire Fire Flow Pressure Pressure Elevation Hydraulic Grade (gpm) Flow (Available) (psi) (Calculated (ft) (ft) Constraints? (gpm) Residual) (psi) J-173 0.00 True 1,500.00 78.6 39.7 6,860.00 7,041.69 J-174 0.00 True 1,500.00 95.9 85.2 6,820.00 7,041.74 J-175 5.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 86.8 6,780.00 7,041.65 J-177 0.00 True 1,453.01 98.1 20.0 6,815.00 7,041.65 J-178 5.00 True 1,500.00 111.0 65.8 6,785.00 7,041.65 J-179 0.00 True 1,500.00 108.9 38.0 6,790.00 7,041.65 J-180 5.00 True 1,500.00 111.0 23.4 6,785.00 7,041.65 J-181 5.00 True 1,044.91 111.0 20.0 6,785.00 7,041.64 J-182 0.00 True 1,500.00 100.2 71.5 6,810.00 7,041.69 J-183 5.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 57.4 6,780.00 7,041.67 J-184 0.00 True 1,500.00 104.6 53.1 6,800.00 7,041.68 J-185 5.00 True 1,500.00 95.9 52.2 6,820.00 7,041.69 J-186 5.00 True 1,500.00 87.3 33.9 6,840.00 7,041.69 J-187 0.00 True 1,500.00 82.9 37.7 6,850.00 7,041.69 J-188 5.00 False 917.37 104.6 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.67 J-189 0.00 True 1,500.00 96.8 87.0 6,818.00 7,041.76 J-190 0.00 False 380.22 65.6 20.0 6,890.00 7,041.68 J-191 0.00 True 1,500.00 115.4 92.4 6,775.00 7,041.73 J-192 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 59.2 6,780.00 7,041.73 J-193 0.00 True 1,500.00 111.1 36.0 6,785.00 7,041.73 J-194 0.00 True 1,500.00 111.1 33.0 6,785.00 7,041.73 J-195 0.00 True 1,500.00 111.1 29.4 6,785.00 7,041.73 J-199 0.00 True 1,500.00 111.1 49.4 6,785.00 7,041.73 J-200 0.00 True 1,500.00 115.4 82.6 6,775.00 7,041.73 J-203 0.00 True 1,500.00 91.6 79.6 6,830.00 7,041.74 J-204 0.00 True 1,500.00 93.8 81.8 6,825.00 7,041.74 J-205 0.00 True 1,500.00 93.8 81.9 6,825.00 7,041.74 J-206 0.00 False 821.01 104.6 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.74 J-207 5.00 True 1,500.00 95.8 55.7 6,820.00 7,041.54 J-208 0.00 True 1,500.00 93.7 43.7 6,825.00 7,041.54 J-209 5.00 False 658.72 104.4 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.28 J-210 0.00 False 710.07 104.4 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.29 J-211 5.00 False 659.09 104.4 20.0 6,800.00 7,041.28 J-212 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 72.0 6,780.00 7,041.68 J-213 5.00 False 961.70 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.65 J-214 5.00 False 769.77 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.64 J-215 0.00 False 733.50 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.65 J-216 0.00 False 975.25 68.3 32.1 6,883.00 7,040.89 J-217 0.00 False 961.79 55.3 20.0 6,913.00 7,040.89 J-218 0.00 False 894.87 49.7 20.0 6,926.00 7,040.89 J-219 0.00 False 594.74 41.1 20.0 6,946.00 7,040.88 J-220 0.00 True 1,500.00 78.6 21.9 6,860.00 7,041.77 J-221 0.00 False 891.83 78.6 20.0 6,860.00 7,041.77 J-222 0.00 True 1,500.00 95.9 41.9 6,820.00 7,041.72 J-224 0.00 True 1,500.00 61.3 28.6 6,900.00 7,041.65 J-225 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 24.3 6,780.00 7,041.66 J-226 0.00 False 588.15 44.5 20.0 6,938.00 7,040.89 J-227 0.00 False 297.49 34.6 20.0 6,961.00 7,040.88 J-228 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 41.2 6,780.00 7,041.66 J-229 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 40.1 6,780.00 7,041.66 J-230 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 46.5 6,780.00 7,041.63

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Junction FlexTable: Fire Flow

Current Time: 0.000 hours

Label Demand Satisfies Fire Fire Flow Pressure Pressure Elevation Hydraulic Grade (gpm) Flow (Available) (psi) (Calculated (ft) (ft) Constraints? (gpm) Residual) (psi) J-231 0.00 True 1,500.00 113.2 45.7 6,780.00 7,041.63 J-232 0.00 False 973.33 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.61 J-233 0.00 False 970.74 113.2 20.0 6,780.00 7,041.61

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)

APPENDIX D

ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY RESPONSE LETTERS