DOCSLIB.ORG

Model Documentation and Results for ERCOT Scenarios

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Model Documentation and Results for ERCOT Scenarios The Full Cost of Electricity (FCe-) Capacity Expansion and Dispatch Modeling: Model Documentation and Results for ERCOT Scenarios PART OF A SERIES OF WHITE PAPERS THE FULL COST OF ELECTRICITY is an interdisciplinary initiative of the Energy Institute of the University of Texas to identify and quantify the full-system cost of electric power generation and delivery – from the power plant to the wall socket. The purpose is to inform public policy discourse with comprehensive, rigorous and impartial analysis. The generation of electric power and the infrastructure that delivers it is in the midst of dramatic and rapid change. Since 2000, declining renewable energy costs, stringent emissions standards, low-priced natural gas (post-2008), competitive electricity markets, and a host of technological innovations promise to forever change the landscape of an industry that has remained static for decades. Heightened awareness of newfound options available to consumers has injected yet another element to the policy debate surrounding these transformative changes, moving it beyond utility boardrooms and legislative hearing rooms to everyday living rooms. The Full Cost of Electricity (FCe-) study employs a holistic approach to thoroughly examine the key factors affecting the total direct and indirect costs of generating and delivering electricity. As an interdisciplinary project, the FCe- synthesizes the expert analysis and different perspectives of faculty across the UT Austin campus, from engineering, economics, law, and policy. In addition to producing authoritative white papers that provide This paper is one in comprehensive assessment and analysis of various electric power a series of Full Cost system options, the study team developed online calculators that allow of Electricity white policymakers and other stakeholders, including the public, to estimate papers that examine the cost implications of potential policy actions. A framework of the particular aspects of research initiative, and a list of research participants and project sponsors the electricity system. are also available on the Energy Institute website: energy.utexas.edu Other white papers All authors abide by the disclosure policies of the University of Texas at produced through the Austin. The University of Texas at Austin is committed to transparency and study can be accessed disclosure of all potential conflicts of interest. All UT investigators involved at the University of Texas with this research have filed their required financial disclosure forms with Energy Institute website: the university. Through this process the university has determined that energy.utexas.edu there are neither conflicts of interest nor the appearance of such conflicts. Capacity Expansion and Dispatch Modeling: Model Documentation and Results for ERCOT Scenarios Neal Mann, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering Chen-Hao Tsai, Bureau of Economic Geology’s Center for Energy Economics, Jackson School of Geosciences Gürcan Gülen, Bureau of Economic Geology’s Center for Energy Economics, Jackson School of Geosciences Erich Schneider, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering Pedro Cuevas, McCombs School of Business Jim Dyer, McCombs School of Business John Butler, McCombs School of Business Tong Zhang, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering Ross Baldick, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering Thomas Deetjen, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering Rachel Morneau, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering Mann, Neal, Tsai, Chen-Hao, Gülen, Gürcan, Schneider, Erich, Cuevas, Pedro, Dyer, Jim, Butler, John, Zhang, Tong, Baldick, Ross, Deetjen, Thomas, Morneau, Rachel, “Capacity Expansion and Dispatch Modeling: Model Documentation and Results for ERCOT Scenarios” White Paper UTEI/2017-4-14, 2017, available at http://energy.utexas.edu/the-full-cost-of-electricity-fce/. The Full Cost of Electricity (FCe-) Model Documentation and Results for ERCOT Scenarios, July 2017 | iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................................................................ v List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................................................. vi List of Acronyms .........................................................................................................................................................................................vii Capacity Expansion and Dispatch Modeling ..............................................................................................................................................1 Long-Term Capacity Expansion Scenarios ...............................................................................................................................................20 Long-Term Capacity Expansion Results ...................................................................................................................................................29 2030 Hourly Dispatch Results ...................................................................................................................................................................38 Conclusions and Future Work ...................................................................................................................................................................41 References .................................................................................................................................................................................................42 Appendix A: ERCOT Plant Database for End-of-Year 2015 .......................................................................................................................44 Appendix B: LCOE, LACE, and Net Value ...................................................................................................................................................53 Appendix C: Wind Rating Factors by Aggregate County (%) ...................................................................................................................56 Appendix D: ERCOT Hardwired Plant Additions for the CT Scenario .......................................................................................................58 Appendix E: ERCOT Hardwired Plant Additions for the AR Scenario (in addition to the CT scenario) ...................................................59 The Full Cost of Electricity (FCe-) Model Documentation and Results for ERCOT Scenarios, July 2017 | iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Key Differences across Four Models ............................................................................................................................................10 Table 2 Resource Capacity by Fuel Type and Primary Mover ....................................................................................................................11 Table 3 Fuels Included in Modeling ..........................................................................................................................................................12 Table 4 Wind Rating Factors by Load Zone (%) ........................................................................................................................................14 Table 5 Distribution of Solar Resources in ERCOT ....................................................................................................................................15 Table 6 Solar Rating Factors by Region (%) ..............................................................................................................................................16 Table 7 Capacities for Combined Heat and Power Plants in ERCOT ..........................................................................................................17 Table 8 Monthly Maximum Capacity Factors for Hydroelectric Generators in ERCOT ................................................................................18 Table 9 Key Long-Term Capacity Expansion Scenario Assumptions ..........................................................................................................20 Table 10 Overnight Capital Expenditures by Generation Technology [$2015/kW], adapted from ERCOT (2015e) .........................................23 Table 11 Financial Parameters for Calculating Base Capital Carrying Cost for Potential New Resources .....................................................25 Table 12 Levelized Investment Tax Credit for Solar PV Facilities [$/MW-Week) ...........................................................................................25 Table 13 Retrofit Costs for Coal Power Plants ($/MW-Week). .....................................................................................................................26 Table 14 Retrofit Costs Assignment based on ERCOT (2011) ......................................................................................................................27 Table 15 Summary of Resources under the Two Scenarios (MW) with AURORAxmp ...................................................................................29 Table 16 Summary of Resources under the Two Scenarios
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRENDS in PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey Report of Selected IEA Countries Between 1992 and 2011
    TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Report IEA-PVPS T1-21:2012 TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Contents Introduction 2 1 Implementation of PV systems 3 2 The PV industry 24 3 Policy, regulatory and business framework for deployment 32 4 Summary of trends 39 PV technology note 44 Foreword This year’s 17th edition of the IEA PVPS international survey report on Trends in Photovoltaic (PV) Applications falls together with almost 20 years of global cooperation within the IEA PVPS The International Energy Agency (IEA), founded in 1974, Programme. The history of PV market deployment over this is an autonomous body within the framework of the decisive period for PV from its very first market developments to Organization for Economic Cooperation and the present large scale deployment, meanwhile accounting for Development (OECD). The IEA carries out a important shares of the newly installed capacity for electricity comprehensive programme of energy cooperation production, can uniquely be followed year by year in the series among its 28 member countries and with the of IEA PVPS trends reports. 2011 has been yet another year of unprecedented further market growth, continued massive participation of the European Commission. cost reduction and ongoing signs of industry and market consolidation. In total, about 28 GW of PV capacity were The IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme installed in the IEA PVPS countries during 2011 (2010: 14,2 GW), (IEA PVPS) is one of the collaborative research and thus again doubling the installed capacity of the year before; this development agreements within the IEA and was raised the total installed capacity in IEA PVPS countries close to established in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.17 Indirect and Cumulative Effects
    FHWA-AZ-EIS-19-01-D Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Section 3.17, Indirect and Cumulative Effects March 2019 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P This page intentionally left blank I-11 Corridor Draft Tier 1 EIS Section 3.17. Indirect and Cumulative Effects 1 3.17 Indirect and Cumulative Effects 2 This section identifies potential indirect and cumulative effects that would result from the 3 implementation of the Build Corridor Alternatives. 4 3.17.1 Regulatory Guidance 5 The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) states that indirect effects “are caused by the 6 action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. 7 Indirect effects may include growth-inducing effects and other effects related to induced 8 changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air 9 and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems” (Code of Federal Regulations 10 Title 40, Sec. 1508.8[b]). Indirect effects are commonly categorized as effects that would not 11 occur “but for” the implementation of a project. Indirect effects also can be considered “ripple 12 effects” (Transportation Research Board 2002). 13 The CEQ states that cumulative effects result from the “incremental impact of an action when 14 added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of which 15 agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions. Cumulative effects can 16 result from individually minor, but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of 17 time” (Code of Federal Regulations title 40, sec.
    [Show full text]
  • PJM Begins Campaign for 'Fuel Security' Payments
    ISSN 2377-8016 : Volume 2018/Issue 4045 November,October 2, 6 2018 PJM Begins Campaign for ‘Fuel Security’ Payments Returning Chair Pledges study in December to Protect FERC’s By Rich Heidorn Jr. and Michael Brooks and plans to introduce Independence WASHINGTON — PJM on Thursday began its a problem statement campaign to compensate generators based on and issue charge in the Chatterjee Praises McIntyre’s first quarter of 2019, their “fuel security,” releasing an eight-page Leadership, Influence summary of a study that showed the RTO could with the filing of any face outages under extreme winter weather, proposed market rule By Michael Brooks changes with FERC in gas pipeline disruptions and “escalated” re- PJM CEO Andy Ott early 2020. WASHINGTON — It was little more than a source retirements. presents the RTO’s fuel year ago that FERC Chairman Neil Chat- At a press conference security study at the The study, which evaluated more than 300 terjee gathered reporters at commission at the National Press National Press Club in winter scenarios, was a “stress test … intended headquarters to assuage worries that Ener- Building, CEO Andy D.C. | © RTO Insider to discover the tipping point when the PJM gy Secretary Rick Perry’s recent proposal to Ott said the study was system begins to be impacted,” the RTO said. compensate coal and nuclear plants would intended to address the concerns of governors destroy the markets. (See “It is clear that key elements, such as availabil- and other policymakers about how soon the FERC Chair Praises ity of non-firm gas service, oil deliverability, Perry’s ‘Bold Leadership’ on NOPR.) pipeline design, reserve level, method of Continued on page 31 Much has happened since: Kevin McIntyre dispatch and availability of demand response took over as chair; the commission unani- become increasingly important as the system mously rejected Perry’s proposal; and, on comes under more stress,” it said.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Is Driving a Global Shift in Electricity Markets
    SOLAR IS DRIVING A GLOBAL SHIFT IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS Rapid Cost Deflation and Broad Gains in Scale May 2018 Tim Buckley, Director of Energy Finance Studies, Australasia ([email protected]) and Kashish Shah, Research Associate ([email protected]) Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 2 1. World’s Largest Operational Utility-Scale Solar Projects ........................................... 4 1.1 World’s Largest Utility-Scale Solar Projects Under Construction ............................ 8 1.2 India’s Largest Utility-Scale Solar Projects Under Development .......................... 13 2. World’s Largest Concentrated Solar Power Projects ............................................... 18 3. Floating Solar Projects ................................................................................................ 23 4. Rooftop Solar Projects ................................................................................................ 27 5. Solar PV With Storage ................................................................................................. 31 6. Corporate PPAs .......................................................................................................... 39 7. Top Renewable Energy Utilities ................................................................................. 44 8. Top Solar Module Manufacturers .............................................................................. 49 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Like the Wind: Selected Issues in Multi-Party Wind Lease Negotiations
    Texas A&M Journal of Property Law Volume 1 Number 3 Wind Farming: Obstacles to Planning Article 5 and Development 2014 Ride Like the Wind: Selected Issues in Multi-Party Wind Lease Negotiations Rod E. Wetsel University of Texas School of Law Steven K. DeWolf University of Texas School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/journal-of-property-law Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons Recommended Citation Rod E. Wetsel & Steven K. DeWolf, Ride Like the Wind: Selected Issues in Multi-Party Wind Lease Negotiations, 1 Tex. A&M J. Real Prop. L. 447 (2013). Available at: https://doi.org/10.37419/JPL.V1.I3.5 This Symposia Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Texas A&M Journal of Property Law by an authorized editor of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\T\TWR\1-3\TWR305.txt unknown Seq: 1 5-MAY-14 16:43 RIDE LIKE THE WIND:† SELECTED ISSUES IN MULTI-PARTY WIND LEASE NEGOTIATIONS By Rod E. Wetsel and Steven K. DeWolf ‡ I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 448 R II. HISTORY OF WIND DEVELOPMENT IN TEXAS: THE WIND BOOM ............................................ 448 R III. THE TEXAS WIND LEASE ............................... 452 R A. Origins and Evolution .............................. 452 R B. Major Elements ..................................... 453 R IV. MULTI-PARTY WIND LEASE NEGOTIATIONS ............ 453 R A. The Town Hall Meeting Concept .................... 454 R B. Some Wind Groups and their Creators: Signing Parties .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • BC-TES-TMP-2443.Pdf (5.514Mb)
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS Para Optar el Título Profesional de INGENIERO MECÁNICO ELECTRICISTA “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA AL CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” Presentado Por: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ Asesor: Msc. Ing. JONY VILLALOBOS CABRERA LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS Para Optar el Título Profesional de INGENIERO MECÁNICO ELECTRICISTA “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA ALELECTRICISTA CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” Presentado Por: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ Aprobado por el Jurado Examinador PRESIDENTE: Dr. DANIEL CARRANZA MONTENEGRO. SECRETARIO: ING. CARLOS JAVIER COTRINA SAAVEDRA. MIEMBRO: ING. TEOBALDO EDGAR JULCA OROZCO. ASESOR: M.Sc. JONY VILLALOBOS CABRERA. LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS TITULO “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA AL CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” CONTENIDOS CAPITULO I: PROBLEMA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN. CAPITULO II: MARCO TEÓRICO. CAPITULO III: MARCO METODOLÓGICO. CAPITULO IV: PROPUESTA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN. CAPITULO V: ANÁLISIS E INTERPRETACIÓN DE LOS RESULTADOS. CAPITULO VI: CONCLUSIONES Y RECOMENDACIONES. AUTOR: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ --------------------------------- --------------------------------------- PRESIDENTE SECRETARIO ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- MIEMBRO ASESOR LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 DEDICATORIA Dedico éste Proyecto de Tesis a: Dios ya que gracias a Él he llegado a concluir una de mis metas la cual es concluir con mi carrera.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum Startpage: 0
    Control Number: 27706 Item Number: 1 75 Addendum StartPage : 0 PROJECT NO. 27706 REPORTS OF THE ELECTRIC § PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS, INC.'S DECEMBER 2009 REPORT ON CAPACITY, DEMAND AND RESERVES IN THE ERCOT REGION COMES NOW, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. (ERCOT) and files its December 2009 Report on Capacity, Demand and Reserves in the ERCOT Region. ERCOT's report is attached hereto as Attachment A. Respectfully submitted, (2'lYVyc 6ek Lori Cobos Associate Corporate Counsel Texas Bar No. 24042276 (512) 225-7073 (Phone) (512) 225-7079 (Fax) lcobosnercot.com ATTORNEY FOR THE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS 000001 1 i0 Attachment A Report on the Capacity, Demand and Reserves in the ERCOT Region December 2009 000002 Contents Tab Notes . :. .•.^ 1 4^•a^.v Please read Definitions List of definitions -0 0 .11 _P C^ran "=^tI Lists changes from prior report ^ -`;, Shows load forecast , generation resources, and reserve margin for summer ummSemmaryer x^ ',^ 2010 through summer 2015 Lists units and their capabilities used in determining the generation resources in SummerCapacities , the Summer Summary 000003 CDR WORKING PAPER FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY This ERCOT Working Paper has been prepared for specific ERCOT and market participant purposes and has been developed from data provided by ERCOT market participants. The data may contain errors or become obsolete and thereby affect the conclusions and opinions of the Working Paper. ERCOT MAKES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCURACY OF SAME OR THE FITNESS OR APPROPRIATENESS OF SAME FOR ANY PARTICULAR USE.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Air Emissions Calculations from Wind and Other Renewables
    ESL-TR-20-07-01 STATEWIDE AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FROM WIND AND OTHER RENEWABLES VOLUME I A Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality For the Period January 2019 – December 2019 Juan-Carlos Baltazar, Ph.D., P.E.; Jeff Haberl, Ph.D.; Bahman Yazdani, P.E.; David Claridge, Ph.D., P.E.; Sungkyun Jung; Farshad Kheiri; Chul Kim July 2020 Page 1 ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY July 15, 2020 Mr. Robert Gifford Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Austin, TX 78711-3087 Dear Mr. Gifford, The Energy Systems Laboratory (ESL) at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station of The Texas A&M University System is pleased to provide its annual report, “Statewide Emissions Calculations From Wind and Other Renewables,” as required by the 79th Legislature. This work has been performed through a contract with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). In this work, the ESL is required to obtain input from public/private stakeholders, and develop and use a methodology to annually report the energy savings from wind and other renewables. This report summarizes the work performed by the ESL on this project from January 2019 to December 2019. Please contact me at (979) 845-9213 should you have questions concerning this report or the work presently being done to quantify emissions reductions from renewable energy measures as a result of the TERP implementation. Sincerely, David E. Claridge, Ph.D., P.E. Director Enclosure . Page 2 Disclaimer This report is provided by the Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) as required under Section 388.003 (e) of the Texas Health and Safety Code and is distributed for purposes of public information.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Austin
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT Dated January 10, 2017 Ratings: Moody’s: “Aa3” Standard & Poor’s: “AA” Fitch: “AA-” (See “OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION – Ratings”) NEW ISSUE Book-Entry-Only Delivery of the Bonds is subject to the receipt of the opinion of Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Bond Counsel, to the effect that, assuming continuing compliance by the City of Austin, Texas (the “City”) with certain covenants contained in the Fifteenth Supplement described in this document, interest on the Bonds will be excludable from gross income for purposes of federal income taxation under existing law, subject to the matters described under “TAX MATTERS” in this document, including the alternative minimum tax on corporations. CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS (Travis, Williamson and Hays Counties) $103,425,000* Electric Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover page The bonds offered in this document are the $103,425,000* City of Austin, Texas Electric Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 (the “Bonds”). The Bonds are the fifteenth series of “Parity Electric Utility Obligations” issued pursuant to the master ordinance governing the issuance of electric utility system indebtedness (the “Master Ordinance”) and are authorized and being issued in accordance with a supplemental ordinance pertaining to the Bonds (the “Fifteenth Supplement”). The Fifteenth Supplement delegated to a designated “Pricing Officer” the authority to effect the sale of the Bonds, subject to the terms of the Fifteenth Supplement. See “INTRODUCTION” in this document. The Master Ordinance provides the terms for the issuance of Parity Electric Utility Obligations and the related covenants and security provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Andres Meesak Päikeseelekter TE2018.Pdf
    Päikeseenergeetika Eestis aprill 2018 Andres Meesak Eesti Päikeseelektri Assotsiatsioon Motivaatorid taastuvenergia lahenduste kasutuselevõtuks • Regulatiivsed – ma pean – (hoonete energiatõhususe nõuded, nõue piirata KHG emissiooni, ...) • Majanduslikud – see on mulle kasulik – (sääst igakuistelt energiakuludelt) • Maailmavaatelised – ma tahan säästa keskkonda Juba aastaid näitavad Eurobaromeetri uuringud (2008., 2009., 2011. ja 2014. aasta küsitlusvoorud), et eestlased on eurooplaste seas üks kliimamuutusi kõige vähem tähtsustavaid rahvaid. Justkui elaksime siin Euroopa perifeerias metsade varjus vanajumala selja taga puutumatuna globaalselt üha kriitilisemaks muutuvast magevee probleemist, põudadest, sagenevatest kuumalainetest ja üleujutustest. Kati Orru, Tartu Ülikooli keskkonnasotsioloog EPL 10.12.2015 Euroopa Liidu Hoonete energiatõhususe direktiiv (2010/31/EL): 01.01.2019 kõik riigi poolt kasutatavad uusehitised 01.01.2021 KÕIK uusehitised KAS LIGINULL VÕI NULLENERGIA HOONED Alates 2021 lisandub aastas ~ 25MW tootmisvõimsust uusehitiste näol, mis toodavad aastas ~ 20-25 GWh elektrit Euroopa Liidu Hoonete energiatõhususe direktiiv (2010/31/EL): Päikeseenergeetika Eestis 2018 Päikeseenergeetika Eestis 2017 - Installeeritud koguvõimsus ca. 19MW - Installeeritud 2017 ca. 7MW +50% +27% +45% +51% +59% +60% - Kokku tootjaid ca. 1100 - Suurimad jaamad 1MW (Kärdla, Kareda) - Valdavalt kuni 15kW erapaigaldised - Fortum Eesti kavandab Tartusse Raadile 50MW võimsusega jaama Aasta keskmine juurdekasv 48% ETEK Taastuvenergia aastaraamat 2017
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Wind Turbines.Pdf
    Bosque County Citizens Against Wind Turbines Presentation to the Bosque County Commissioner's Court January 25, 2021 The purpose of this presentation is to inform the Bosque County Commissioners Court of opposition to any act by the Bosque County Commissioner's Court that would increase the likelihood of the construction of wind turbines in the County. Our initial presentation is directed at two goals supported by the information included with this memorandum: 1. Best Result- The Bosque County Commissioner's Court would pass a resolution stating it's position against wind turbines and specifically that no tax abatements will be granted for such purpose. 2. Next Best Result- Should any application be made for tax abatements or other actions that would further the construction of wind turbines in Bosque County, the Commissioner's Court would agree to move slowly and deliberately to allow citizens to be heard and information beyond this presentation to be made on the key issues. This opposition is based on at least the following issues supported by the studies and articles attached and on the flash drives provided: 3. Many organized groups of landowners, business men and women, residents and government officials have already organized and established websites over flowing with credible data on the negative impact of wind turbine energy. These groups include at least the following: a. TLOW.org (Brown County) b. Texas Land Owners Coalition (TXLC.org)(Central Texas) c. Save our Scenic Hill County Environment (Soshillcountry.org) d. WindAction.org ( National watch dog group) e. Plus groups without websites including: i. Cross Timbers Landowners Conservancy ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Comentarios – PBJL Energy Corporation
    ó PBJL ENERGY CORPORATION 504 Fernado Calder St, Urbanización Ingenieros, San Juan, PR 00918 February 16, 2021 Mr. Edison Avilés-Deliz Chairman Public Service Regulatory Board Puerto Rico Energy Bureau 268 Muñoz Rivera Ave. San Juan, PR 00918 Filed under PREB Case Number: NEPR-MI-2020-0012 Re: Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s (“PREPA”) filing with the Public Service Regulatory Board of the Puerto Rico Energy Bureau under Case Number NEPR-MI-2020-0012 on February 9, 2021. Subject: Motion in Compliance with Order Submitting List of Projects PREPA will Potentially Chose to Acquire 150 MW of Renewable Energy Dear Mr. Avilés-Deliz: The 165 MW AC / 395 MW DC Montalva Solar Farm Project (hereinafter “Montalva” or “Project”) with its initial phase of 80 MW AC / 162 MW DC, sponsored by PBJL Energy Corporation (“PBJL”), a Puerto Rican corporation, together with Greenbriar Capital Corp (“Greenbriar”); hereby files a response to the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s (“PREPA”) filing with the Public Service Regulatory Board of the Puerto Rico Energy Bureau (“PREB”) dated February 9, 2021, under Case Number NEPR-MI-2020-0012 titled “Motion in Compliance with Order Submitting List of Projects PREPA will Potentially Chose to Acquire 150 MW of Renewable Energy.” PBJL and Greenbriar Capital Corp acknowledge the PREPA filing with PREB and herein highlight its project’s attributes for the consideration of the criteria for the selection and for approval of its proposed PPOA Power Purchase and Operation Agreement (”PPOA”) from among the 16 shovel-ready projects under consideration for approval by the FOMB. It should be technically and financially clear to PREPA and all stakeholders that Montalva is the lowest cost project to ratepayers and Montalva is a premier project for Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]