DOCSLIB.ORG

10 Wind Turbines.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10 Wind Turbines.Pdf Bosque County Citizens Against Wind Turbines Presentation to the Bosque County Commissioner's Court January 25, 2021 The purpose of this presentation is to inform the Bosque County Commissioners Court of opposition to any act by the Bosque County Commissioner's Court that would increase the likelihood of the construction of wind turbines in the County. Our initial presentation is directed at two goals supported by the information included with this memorandum: 1. Best Result- The Bosque County Commissioner's Court would pass a resolution stating it's position against wind turbines and specifically that no tax abatements will be granted for such purpose. 2. Next Best Result- Should any application be made for tax abatements or other actions that would further the construction of wind turbines in Bosque County, the Commissioner's Court would agree to move slowly and deliberately to allow citizens to be heard and information beyond this presentation to be made on the key issues. This opposition is based on at least the following issues supported by the studies and articles attached and on the flash drives provided: 3. Many organized groups of landowners, business men and women, residents and government officials have already organized and established websites over flowing with credible data on the negative impact of wind turbine energy. These groups include at least the following: a. TLOW.org (Brown County) b. Texas Land Owners Coalition (TXLC.org)(Central Texas) c. Save our Scenic Hill County Environment (Soshillcountry.org) d. WindAction.org ( National watch dog group) e. Plus groups without websites including: i. Cross Timbers Landowners Conservancy ii. Lower Laguna Madre Foundation iii. North Texas Wind Resistance Alliance iv. Protect North Palo Duro Canyon v. Protect Our West Texas Landscape f. An overview of the key issues from the TLOW.org website is attached to this presentation. 4. Negative impact of wind turbines on the value of land on which they are constructed as well as neighboring land severely affective the County tax base. a. See Derry Gardner (Gardner Appraisal Group, Inc./ San Antonio, Texas ) report and summary supporting a decrease in value of land between 29% and 45% for an average of 37%. (47 page report included in flash drive provided) b. See Kurt C Kielisch ( President/ Sr. Appraiser - Appraisal Group One) report and summary supporting a decrease in value of land between 12% and 40%. ( 17 page report included in flash drive provided) c. See Kurt C Kielish ( President/ Sr. Appraiser - Appraisal Group One) Wind Turbine Impact Study (Summary attached; full 73 page report in flash drive provided) d. See Lansink Appraisals and Consulting (Ontario, Canada) case study report supporting a decrease of between 35% and 37% in two case studies. ( 71 page report included in flash drive provided) 5. Growing evidence and concern over adverse health effects of industrial wind turbines. a. See Adverse Health Effects of Industrial Wind Turbines article by Dr. Roy Jeffery (Ontario, Canada) concluding that industrial wind turbines can harm human health if situated too close to residents. (See article attached) b. Madison County Iowa Board of Public Health on record that there are legitimate negative health effects caused by wind turbines. (See Article attached) 6. Extensive Study and Presentation to the Hamilton County, Texas Commissioner's Court Noting the Following Impact: a. Decreased property values b. Property taken through eminent domain for transmission lines c. Loss of scenic beauty and recreational assets d. Local businesses will be negatively impacted by wind turbines e. Noise, nuisance and turbine effects on health and pitting neighbor against neighbor f. Big energy law suits against rural counties g. Turbines and transmission lines effect on endangered species h. Impact on Fort Hood flights and training i. Wind turbine fires and accidents j. Good for the wind company but not good for county residents k. Serious concerns over decommissioning wind turbines; blades last 10 years. (See article attached) 7. Risk of Damage, Failure, Injury and Fire a. See pictures of all of these issues.(Pictures attached) 8. Resolutions Against the Construction of Wind Turbines (attached) a. Gilespie County Resolution b. Gilespie County EDC Resolution c. Fredricksburg Visitors and Convention Bureau Resolution d. Farm Bureau Resolution Property Values Will Decrease Decreasing Property Values of 25% to 40% Where Wind Farms Exist Are Real. The installation of industrial wind power facilities will severely reduce local property values. Historically, 80% of land real estate transactions Brown and Coleman counties are those involving recreational buyers. In other words, people buy land in Brown and Coleman counties to enjoy the beauty, peace, and tranquility of the land and lifestyle that it represents. The result of a wind project in our area will be a significant reduction in marketability of our land, homes and our county if we allow it to proceed. While solar has a much smaller footprint, the impact to those adjoining or in sight line could still encounter a substantial impact on marketability and value in a market such as Brown County where recreational buyers make up the vast majority of transactions. The common sense approach concerning values, and the most widely used and accepted approach to valuing rural property, is defined as an estimate of value of recent sales of similar property in the surrounding or competing areas - as compared to the subject property. The facts are these: property values in our Brown County Texas areas have increased dramatically over the last several years with buyers from urban areas acquiring land for recreation and retirement purposes. These buyers spend money in our county and our cities. They eat at our restaurants, shop at our stores, contract with our tradesman, and pay taxes. In areas of our state and nation where wind turbine companies have developed wind industrial zones, property values have decreased materially. Many cannot sell their land once turbines are introduced. So, what will happen when industrial wind zones are developed in our counties, where land is selling at $3,000 or more per acre? It will significantly slow down our real estate market and slow our economic growth as we have come to know it. Just as scenic views and water features tend to increase property values, we know based on publicly available evidence that massive industrial turbines and power transmission lines will dramatically decrease property values. Based on independent studies, the values may decrease 25% to 40% or more in these areas. In fact, buyers are already wary of the prospect of wind zones in our county. Several brokers who sell property in our area, including Comanche and Mills Counties, state that 8 of 10 buyers will not even look at a property if there are wind turbines in view. Brokers have reported, that within the last six months they have had clients decide not to buy land because of the potential of wind turbines being built in proximity to the property. Those landowners who wish to sell property at this time are already seeing the effects of this proposed project. Value and marketability impacts are real and they are substantial. Furthermore the wind and solar companies gain the large profits of increased electricity costs, federal subsidies, and state tax credits. The landowner gains none of these tax incentives or real profits in comparison to such wind companies. Hard facts are - if wind turbines are in your view, you lose. Sources: Gardner report link http://www.texas-wildlife.org/program-areas/impact-of­ wind-turbines-on-market-value-of-texas-rural-land Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/judeclemente/2015/09/23/do-wind­ turbines-lower-property-values/?fbclid= ... Wind Action Group: http://www.windaction.org/posts/26696-testimony-of­ michael-mccann-on-property-value-impacts-in-adams ... Renewable Energy Requires Our Tax Dollars to Survive "For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit." Warren Buffett Renewable energy exists because our representatives in both the federal government and our local governments give multi-national companies our tax dollars. There are three significant tax revenue sources for these companies. The federal Production Tax Credit (PTC) provides a significant tax revenue for wind installations. It is estimated that this tax credit will provide $488 of our tax dollars to the wind energy industry by the time it phases out. The PTC is a subsidy that benefits a few energy corporations. Only 15 parent companies account for more than three-fourths of all PTC eligibility. The PTC distorts electricity markets. It encourages wind energy producers to accept negative prices. The negative prices increase costs for other energy producers and electricity suppliers. The PTC operates within a web of wind energy incentives that increase costs to taxpayers, further distort electricity markets, and benefit large corporations. The PTC is slated to phase out completely by the end of 2019. The federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) provides significant tax credits offsetting the cost of building solar installations. This credit is the single largest funding source for,solar in Texas. Without the ITC, Texas would not have one solar installation. The ITC encourages large corporations, many of them foreign, to make investments in our rural areas. Local property tax abatements are also sought and provided to wind and solar developers. Under Texas Chapter 312 & 313 of the property tax code, local governments can provide a cap on the valuation of the newly installed wind and solar facilities at $1 OM per year for 10 years. Assuming that an installed cost $250M - $400M, this is an astronomical benefit to the large corporations and a terrible disservice to our communities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PJM Begins Campaign for 'Fuel Security' Payments
    ISSN 2377-8016 : Volume 2018/Issue 4045 November,October 2, 6 2018 PJM Begins Campaign for ‘Fuel Security’ Payments Returning Chair Pledges study in December to Protect FERC’s By Rich Heidorn Jr. and Michael Brooks and plans to introduce Independence WASHINGTON — PJM on Thursday began its a problem statement campaign to compensate generators based on and issue charge in the Chatterjee Praises McIntyre’s first quarter of 2019, their “fuel security,” releasing an eight-page Leadership, Influence summary of a study that showed the RTO could with the filing of any face outages under extreme winter weather, proposed market rule By Michael Brooks changes with FERC in gas pipeline disruptions and “escalated” re- PJM CEO Andy Ott early 2020. WASHINGTON — It was little more than a source retirements. presents the RTO’s fuel year ago that FERC Chairman Neil Chat- At a press conference security study at the The study, which evaluated more than 300 terjee gathered reporters at commission at the National Press National Press Club in winter scenarios, was a “stress test … intended headquarters to assuage worries that Ener- Building, CEO Andy D.C. | © RTO Insider to discover the tipping point when the PJM gy Secretary Rick Perry’s recent proposal to Ott said the study was system begins to be impacted,” the RTO said. compensate coal and nuclear plants would intended to address the concerns of governors destroy the markets. (See “It is clear that key elements, such as availabil- and other policymakers about how soon the FERC Chair Praises ity of non-firm gas service, oil deliverability, Perry’s ‘Bold Leadership’ on NOPR.) pipeline design, reserve level, method of Continued on page 31 Much has happened since: Kevin McIntyre dispatch and availability of demand response took over as chair; the commission unani- become increasingly important as the system mously rejected Perry’s proposal; and, on comes under more stress,” it said.
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Like the Wind: Selected Issues in Multi-Party Wind Lease Negotiations
    Texas A&M Journal of Property Law Volume 1 Number 3 Wind Farming: Obstacles to Planning Article 5 and Development 2014 Ride Like the Wind: Selected Issues in Multi-Party Wind Lease Negotiations Rod E. Wetsel University of Texas School of Law Steven K. DeWolf University of Texas School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/journal-of-property-law Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons Recommended Citation Rod E. Wetsel & Steven K. DeWolf, Ride Like the Wind: Selected Issues in Multi-Party Wind Lease Negotiations, 1 Tex. A&M J. Real Prop. L. 447 (2013). Available at: https://doi.org/10.37419/JPL.V1.I3.5 This Symposia Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Texas A&M Journal of Property Law by an authorized editor of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\T\TWR\1-3\TWR305.txt unknown Seq: 1 5-MAY-14 16:43 RIDE LIKE THE WIND:† SELECTED ISSUES IN MULTI-PARTY WIND LEASE NEGOTIATIONS By Rod E. Wetsel and Steven K. DeWolf ‡ I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 448 R II. HISTORY OF WIND DEVELOPMENT IN TEXAS: THE WIND BOOM ............................................ 448 R III. THE TEXAS WIND LEASE ............................... 452 R A. Origins and Evolution .............................. 452 R B. Major Elements ..................................... 453 R IV. MULTI-PARTY WIND LEASE NEGOTIATIONS ............ 453 R A. The Town Hall Meeting Concept .................... 454 R B. Some Wind Groups and their Creators: Signing Parties .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum Startpage: 0
    Control Number: 27706 Item Number: 1 75 Addendum StartPage : 0 PROJECT NO. 27706 REPORTS OF THE ELECTRIC § PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS, INC.'S DECEMBER 2009 REPORT ON CAPACITY, DEMAND AND RESERVES IN THE ERCOT REGION COMES NOW, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. (ERCOT) and files its December 2009 Report on Capacity, Demand and Reserves in the ERCOT Region. ERCOT's report is attached hereto as Attachment A. Respectfully submitted, (2'lYVyc 6ek Lori Cobos Associate Corporate Counsel Texas Bar No. 24042276 (512) 225-7073 (Phone) (512) 225-7079 (Fax) lcobosnercot.com ATTORNEY FOR THE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS 000001 1 i0 Attachment A Report on the Capacity, Demand and Reserves in the ERCOT Region December 2009 000002 Contents Tab Notes . :. .•.^ 1 4^•a^.v Please read Definitions List of definitions -0 0 .11 _P C^ran "=^tI Lists changes from prior report ^ -`;, Shows load forecast , generation resources, and reserve margin for summer ummSemmaryer x^ ',^ 2010 through summer 2015 Lists units and their capabilities used in determining the generation resources in SummerCapacities , the Summer Summary 000003 CDR WORKING PAPER FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY This ERCOT Working Paper has been prepared for specific ERCOT and market participant purposes and has been developed from data provided by ERCOT market participants. The data may contain errors or become obsolete and thereby affect the conclusions and opinions of the Working Paper. ERCOT MAKES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCURACY OF SAME OR THE FITNESS OR APPROPRIATENESS OF SAME FOR ANY PARTICULAR USE.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Air Emissions Calculations from Wind and Other Renewables
    ESL-TR-20-07-01 STATEWIDE AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FROM WIND AND OTHER RENEWABLES VOLUME I A Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality For the Period January 2019 – December 2019 Juan-Carlos Baltazar, Ph.D., P.E.; Jeff Haberl, Ph.D.; Bahman Yazdani, P.E.; David Claridge, Ph.D., P.E.; Sungkyun Jung; Farshad Kheiri; Chul Kim July 2020 Page 1 ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY July 15, 2020 Mr. Robert Gifford Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Austin, TX 78711-3087 Dear Mr. Gifford, The Energy Systems Laboratory (ESL) at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station of The Texas A&M University System is pleased to provide its annual report, “Statewide Emissions Calculations From Wind and Other Renewables,” as required by the 79th Legislature. This work has been performed through a contract with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). In this work, the ESL is required to obtain input from public/private stakeholders, and develop and use a methodology to annually report the energy savings from wind and other renewables. This report summarizes the work performed by the ESL on this project from January 2019 to December 2019. Please contact me at (979) 845-9213 should you have questions concerning this report or the work presently being done to quantify emissions reductions from renewable energy measures as a result of the TERP implementation. Sincerely, David E. Claridge, Ph.D., P.E. Director Enclosure . Page 2 Disclaimer This report is provided by the Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) as required under Section 388.003 (e) of the Texas Health and Safety Code and is distributed for purposes of public information.
    [Show full text]
  • 96-1359 Report of the Texas Economic Development Act 2021
    Glenn Hegar Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Report of the Texas Economic Development Act 2021 A Report of the Texas Economic Development Act Introduction In 2001, the Texas Legislature established the Texas Economic Development Act, often called Chapter 313 for its place in the Texas Tax Code. The Chapter 313 program allows public school districts to offer tax incentives for businesses that make large capital investments and create jobs in Texas communities. The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA) administers this program, devoting over 20,000 hours of staff time annually to the task. Chapter 313 currently is set to expire on December 31, 2022. In 2019, there were 383 active agreements. Of those, 42 percent were for manufacturing projects and 57 percent were for renewable energy projects. In the 2021 report, there are 509 active agreements; 38 percent are for manufacturing projects and 61 percent are for renewable energy projects. There are four research and development projects in each report. The Chapter 313 program continues to grow. In 2017, CPA received 68 new applications. The number of new applications grew to 94 in 2018 and to 133 in 2019. This report contains information on each of the 509 active agreements and aggregate data of these agreements. The information is submitted in compliance with Texas Tax Code, Chapter 313.032. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts • January 2021 1 A Report of the Texas Economic Development Act Statutory Reporting Requirements HB 3390 from the 83rd Legislature, Regular Session, repealed the reporting requirements in Sec. 313.008 and amended the reporting requirements in Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Costs and Emissions Reductions from the Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) Wind Transmission Project in Texas
    Costs and Emissions Reductions from the Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) Wind Transmission Project in Texas Gabriel Kwok* and Tyler Greathouse† *Dr. Dalia Patiño-Echeverri, Advisor †Dr. Lori Bennear, Advisor May 2011 Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University 2011 Abstract Wind power has the potential to significantly reduce air emissions from the electric power sector, but the best wind sites are located far from load centers and will require new transmission lines. Texas currently has the largest installed wind power capacity in the U.S., but a lack of transmission capacity between the western part of the state, where most wind farms are located, and the major load centers in the east has led to frequent wind curtailments. State policymakers have addressed this issue by approving a $5 billion transmission project, the Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ), which will expand the transmission capacity to 18,456 MW by 2014. In this paper, we examine the impacts of large-scale wind power in ERCOT, the power market that serves 85% of the state’s load, after the completion of the CREZ project. We assess the generation displaced and the resulting emissions reductions. We then examine the public costs of wind to estimate the CO2 abatement cost. We develop an economic dispatch model of ERCOT to quantify the generation displaced by wind power and the emissions reductions in 2014. Since there is uncertainty about the amount of new wind developed between now and 2014, three wind penetration scenarios were assessed that correspond to wind supplying 9%, 14% and 21% of ERCOT’s total generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasured Turbines
    RENEWABLES ig increases in renewable energy instal- lations look to put a powerful wind beneath the wings of U.S. project cargo TREASURED transportation for decades to come. BAs sure as the wind blows, North American demand for wind energy is flying high, according to government and trade association projections, TURBINES meaning those engaged in transport of the blades, turbines, nacelles, towers and related oversize com- ponents used in capturing it may just have to hold onto their proverbial hats. U.S. Wind Energy Boom to Power With lower costs of wind power generation, extended production tax credits, and moves by for- Heavy-Lift Imports, Exports ward-thinking corporations and state legislatures to reduce carbon footprints, the American Wind Energy Association has set its sights on doubling BY PAUL SCOTT ABBOTT U.S. wind energy capacity over the next five years. ABOVE: A section of tower for a wind installation is strapped to a specialized truck and taken to an under-construction wind farm. / Credit: Suzlon 36 BREAKBULK MAGAZINE www.breakbulk.com ISSUE 4 / 2016 PORTOFLONGVIEW.COM | T. 360-425-3305 F. 360-425-8650 | 10 PORT WAY, LONGVIEW, WASHINGTON 98632 RENEWABLES Utility companies see wind power providing energy security by diversify- ing the electricity generation portfolio, “Wind is winning.... The challenge is to make protecting against volatile natural gas renewable technology so cheap that it’s the price spikes, while using an environmen- tally friendly domestic source of energy. obvious choice.” – Chris Brown, Vestas Wind Systems Many utilities have signed long-term, fixed-price contracts for wind energy, often involving bringing the power The EIA report shows wind surpass- Maryland, Vermont and Hawaii have across state lines.
    [Show full text]
  • New Electric Generating Plants in Texas Since 1995 (Updated 12/31/2013)
    ERCOT - Electric Reliability Council of Texas SPP New Electric Generating SERC - Southeastern Electric Reliability Council 6 SPP - Southwest Power Pool Plants in Texas Since 1995 WECC - Western Electricity Coordinating Council (excluding renewable) Amarillo 53 Kiowa, OK 226 146 19 189 20 147 SPP 28 229 10 74 66 Dallas 139 71 245 35 58 Abilene 52 54 30 79 237 3 22 45 231 136 234 145 17 El Paso 215 171 78 47 WECC ERCOT 85 251 233 57 Ector County 190 123 34 86 216 224 122 63 SERC 187 240 21 Austin 151 134 228 133 14 244 33 39 49 Houston Bastrop and Travis Counties 121 44 70 Harris County 55 26 27 48 80 248 64 236 5 32 36 37 San Antonio 242 76 120 87 246 56 67 69 119 59 223 127 140 149 180 181 Bexar County 114 90 15 65 99 131 137 182 193 227 247 13 18 Calhoun County Brazoria County Corpus 23 150 239 250 102 Guadalupe County Christi 4 11 83 241 24 46 221 Nueces County 38 16 50 124 128 219 Completed projects totaling 43,409 MW 12 211 232 2 12/31/2013 Announced projects totaling 19,198 MW 238 230 ERCOT - Electric Reliability Council of Texas SPP New Electric Generating 125 SERC - Southeastern Electric Reliability Council 141 SPP - Southwest Power Pool Plants in Texas Since 1995 152 184 WECC - Western Electricity Coordinating Council 186 164 84 218 (renewable) Amarillo 194 210 Carson County 202 198 178 205 43 135 188 192 203 Hansford County 225 61 118 132 155 Borden and Scurry Counties 94 60 77 88 92 96 97 110 111 179 213 167 169 148 208 101 185 207 107 Nolan and Taylor Counties 177 191 SPP 199 91 204 40 62 68 72 73 106 109 112 166 153 163 162
    [Show full text]
  • MAYAKI Ezekiel Asuku.Pdf
    MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF THE APPROPRIATE OFFSHORE WIND FARM LOCATION IN NIGERIA Energy sustainability requires meeting our energy needs upon which economic development depends. The need to improve on the present power generating capacity of Nigeria, has brought about energy diversification by increasing the present energy sources to include renewable resources and this has led to the idea of this work. This work is aimed at determining the appropriate offshore wind farm location(s) in Nigeria to address the issue of wind energy availability and utilization in the country. Attributes for offshore wind farm location were collected for three Alternatives in Nigeria which are Victoria Island in Lagos, Koko offshore region of Warri and Abbonema of Port-Hacourt. Wind speeds data were collected from the Nigeria Metrological (NIMET) stations in the states under consideration while other required attributes were collected with the use of a Questionnaire which was responded to by professionals. Collected data were analyzed using fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria analysis tool. Average of a ten years wind speed for Lagos, Warri and Port-Harcourt were 6.251m/s, 7.294m/s and 7.347m/s respectively. Analytic Hierarchy Process gave a Consistency Index of 0.1230 and Consistency Ratio of 0.0843. The consistency ratio from the AHP was used to calculate the required Criteria Weight (Cw) for the fuzzy TOPSIS analysis. The results from the TOPSIS analysis showed that Lagos showed a greater advantage over the two other alternatives been considered. Finally, from the cummulative value of the analyzed attributes, Victoria Island (Lagos) has the highest figure of 233.6677 with a consideration rate of 38% and this places it above Koko (Warri) and Abonnema (Port-Harcourt) with a value of 187.7704 (30%) and 195.4378 (32%).
    [Show full text]
  • REMARKETING MEMORANDUM and "REDEMPTION and "REDEMPTION BONDS"
    REMARKETING MEMORANDUM Dated: November 9, 2010 RATINGS: Fitch AA+/F1+ Moody's Aa2/VMIG 1 Standard & Poor's AA-/A-1+ NOT A NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry-Only See "RATINGS" herein In the opinion of Bond Counsel, the conversion of the Bonds to a two-year Term Rate, as described under "THE BONDS – INTEREST" herein, will not have an adverse affect on the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes under the existing law, subject to the matters under "TAX MATTERS" herein. See Appendix E. "Form of Initial Opinion of Co-Bond Counsel and Form of Remarketing Opinion of Bond Counsel" for information concerning the legal opinion delivered on November 18, 2004 and the legal opinion to be delivered in connection with the remarketing of the Bonds. See "TAX MATTERS" herein. $147,615,000 CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS ELECTRIC AND GAS SYSTEMS JUNIOR LIEN REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2004 (CUSIP: 796253Y55)* Dated: Date of Delivery Mandatory Tender Date: December 3, 2012 Due: December 1, 2027 Interest: The City of San Antonio, Texas ("City") Electric and Gas Systems Junior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2004 ("Bonds") will be remarketed in a two-year Term Mode. While in the Term Mode (i) the Bonds will bear interest at 1.15% per annum from December 1, 2010 for an interest rate period extending through November 30, 2012 and thereafter for successive two-year interest rate periods (unless changed as described herein) at Term Rates determined by the Remarketing Agent, and (ii) interest on the Bonds will be payable on each June 1 and December 1, beginning June 1, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTION Policy • Advocacy • Business • Finance • Legal • Environment • International
    DIRECTION Policy • Advocacy • Business • Finance • Legal • Environment • International DNV GL: A cleaner, more electrified world is within reach by 2050 An era of abundant and cleaner energy lies ahead, according to DNV GL’s modeling of the world energy system. (Courtesy: DNV GL) DNV GL recently published its first followed by onshore wind, hy- “Our report shows that the ener- Energy Transition Outlook (ETO): dropower, and offshore wind, in gy industry, more than any other, Renewables, Power and Energy that order. has the power and knowledge to Use. The industry implication re- manage the world’s carbon bud- port is part of DNV GL’s new suite Despite this optimistic outlook, the get in a smarter way,” said Ditlev of Energy Transition Outlook pub- report finds that the world is not on Engel, CEO at DNV GL-Energy. lications. The report reviews global course to achieve the climate objec- “Until 2050, the electricity share energy demand and energy supply tives of the Paris agreement. of energy demand will grow from and summarizes the implications DNV GL forecasts that human- 18 percent to 40 percent, yet this for the power and renewables sector ity will exhaust the 2 degrees C transformation is not happening and large industrial energy users. carbon budget (the amount of CO2 fast enough. Speeding up the ac- An era of abundant and clean- that can be emitted without trig- celeration by decarbonization of er energy lies ahead, according to gering dangerous climate change) heat and transport will be one vital DNV GL’s modeling of the world by 2041, pointing toward a global measure to put the brakes on glob- energy system.
    [Show full text]
  • City of San Antonio, Texas
    REMARKETING MEMORANDUM Dated: November 18, 2014 NOT A NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry-Only RATINGS: See "RATINGS" herein In the Original Opinion (hereinafter defined), Co-Bond Counsel (hereinafter defined) rendered an opinion, assuming continuing compliance by the City (hereinafter defined) after the date of initial delivery of the Bonds (hereinafter defined) with certain covenants contained in the Ordinance (hereinafter defined) and subject to the matters set forth under "TAX MATTERS" herein, that interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes under existing statutes, regulations, published rulings, and court decisions (1) would be excludable from the gross income of the owners thereof pursuant to section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date of initial delivery of the Bonds, and (2) would not be included in computing the alternative minimum taxable income of individuals or, except as described herein, corporations. Because the Bonds are being converted from the initial Interest Period (defined herein) to a new Interest Period, the Ordinance does not require that an Opinion of Counsel be delivered in connection with such conversion Co-Bond Counsel will, however (and in accordance with the Ordinance), render an opinion to the Paying Agent/ Registrar (defined below) that such remarketing will not adversely affect the excludability of interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes. The Remarketing Agent (defined below) will be allowed to rely on any such opinion. See "TAX MATTERS" herein. Additionally, see "THE BONDS – Determination of Interest Rate; Rate Mode Changes" identifying circumstances when an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel is required as a condition for an interest rate mode conversion.
    [Show full text]