DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparison of Shovel Testing and Surface Collection As Archaeological Site Discovery Methods: a Case Study Using Mississippian Farmsteads

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparison of Shovel Testing and Surface Collection As Archaeological Site Discovery Methods: a Case Study Using Mississippian Farmsteads University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2016 A Comparison Of Shovel Testing And Surface Collection As Archaeological Site Discovery Methods: A Case Study Using Mississippian Farmsteads Cameron Smith Howell University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Howell, Cameron Smith, "A Comparison Of Shovel Testing And Surface Collection As Archaeological Site Discovery Methods: A Case Study Using Mississippian Farmsteads" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 337. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/337 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARISON OF SHOVEL TESTING AND SURFACE COLLECTION AS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE DISCOVERY METHODS: A CASE STUDY USING MISSISSIPPIAN FARMSTEADS A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology The University of Mississippi By CAMERON SMITH HOWELL May 2016 Copyright Cameron Smith Howell 2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Shovel testing and controlled surface collection are common methods of archaeological site investigation that are generally approved by state and federal agencies as well as the academic community for cultural resource management projects and research. While both techniques are equally utilized, little research has been conducted on how equivalent these techniques are in terms of their efficacy for finding site. This thesis seeks to find a way to compare these techniques by creating Mathematical Models to describe how well the methods behave when tested on known datasets generated from Mississippian period farmsteads. The predicted performance can then be compared to real world results of investigations. A discussion then follows on the implications for treating the investigation techniques as equivalent and recommendations are made to adjust for survey efficacy bias in future research designs. ii DEDICATION For my parents Harold and Harriet Howell and especially my son, Rowan Howell. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It has been a long, arduous journey, but I have finally made it. I could not have done it without the help of a number of people and institutions. Dr. Jay Johnson and my committee members Robbie Ethridge and Matthew Murray have shown extreme patience and a continued willingness to work with me, which was essential to me being able to finish and not having to start all over again. I would likely still be working on it in the next lifetime, if that were the case. To them I owe a big debt of thanks for helping push this through. Thanks also go to the numerous people who provided reports as well as the state historic preservation offices in Mississippi and Georgia. Mark Williams allowed me to quickly dive through their nascent site database and pull out reports. Janet Rafferty and Evan Peacock provided reports which greatly helped to add to the database for Mississippi, as did Jay Johnson from his own surveys in the area. I am thankful for the fieldwork done by graduate students at Alabama whose work provided almost all of the information on the Black Warrior River Valley. An underlying goal of this thesis was to learn statistical techniques and geographic modeling. I had the benefit of great teachers who helped me achieve this goal through their patient instruction: my father Harold Howell for ideas on how to model geometrically the surface collection model, Dr. Henrique Momme for spatial analysis, Jay Johnson for basic statistical reasoning, and the University of South Carolina’s Drs. John Grego and Brian Habing for more intricate statistical understanding. iv Along the way I had a great deal of involvement from a number of helpful ears and oftentimes bewildered readers who provided editorial commentary and positive feedback which makes all the difference for creating the energy necessary to finish this kind of task: Leoma Gilley for editorial comments on organizing life and the thesis, Linda Christensen for positive reinforcement and life outlook, my mother Harriet Howell for help on graphically illustrating the Mathematical Models, and Rachel Black for editorial feedback. Finally, the energy and unwavering belief in me by my family and friends made all the difference, and I count myself as being especially blessed and privileged to have had their love and support. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... xi 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Bias ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.2 History of Archaeological Methods and Theory of Site Discovery ............................... 15 2.3 Regulation and Development of Cultural Resource Management ................................. 27 3 DATA ................................................................................................................................... 36 3.1 Mississippian Farmsteads ............................................................................................... 36 3.2 Database ......................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 Major Database Regions ................................................................................................ 52 3.3.1 Piedmont ................................................................................................................. 52 vi 3.3.2 Black Warrior River Valley .................................................................................... 53 3.3.3 Black Prairie............................................................................................................ 55 3.4 Analytical Units.............................................................................................................. 56 4 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 61 4.1 Real World Data Model ................................................................................................. 62 4.2 Mathematical Model ...................................................................................................... 64 4.2.1 Site Detection .......................................................................................................... 66 4.2.2 Site Metrics: Size and Density ................................................................................ 70 4.2.3 Surface Collection Model ....................................................................................... 72 4.2.4 Shovel Testing Model ............................................................................................. 74 4.3 Site Modeling ................................................................................................................. 76 4.4 Testing Significance ....................................................................................................... 78 5 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................. 81 5.1 Real World Modeling Results ........................................................................................ 82 5.2 Mathematical Model Results .......................................................................................... 89 5.3 Regional Differences and Implications based on the Mathematical Model ................. 100 5.4 Comparing the Real World Model to the Mathematical Model................................... 104 5.5 Results Discussion........................................................................................................ 112 vii 5.6 Effects of Survey Bias on Discovery of Significant/National Register Eligible Sites . 113 5.7 Methods for Achieving Surface Collection and stp Detection Probability Parity ....... 118 5.8 Making the Settlement Data Between Regions Comparable ....................................... 122 5.9 Issues, Concerns, and Future Directions Generated by the Use of the Database ......... 125 5.10 Mathematical Model Reliability ............................................................................... 125 5.11 Results Summary .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Darwin's Legacy
    Darwin’s Darwin’s Legacy: Legacy: 24 TheThe Status Status of Evolutionary of Evolutionary ArchaeologyArchaeology in Argentina in Argentina Tribute to the 200th anniversary of the Editedbirth by of Charles Darwin and the 150th Marceloanniversary Cardillo & ofHernán the publication Muscio of The Origin of Species El Legado de Darwin: El estado de la Arqueología Evolucionista en Argentina Homenaje a los 200 años del nacimiento de Charles Darwin y a los 150 años de la publicación de El Origen de las Especies Access Archaeology o hae pre rc s A s A y c g c e o l s o s e A a r c Ah Edited by Marcelo Cardillo & Hernán Muscio Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 270 3 (e-Pdf) ISBN 978 1 78491 276 5 © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2016 South American Archaeology Series No 24 Series Editor Andrés D. Izeta All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Contents PREFACE ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Hernán Muscio, Marcelo Cardillo Introduction: Evolutionary Archaeology a comprehensive framework �������������������������������������� vii Hernán MUSCIO, Marcelo CARDILLO References �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������xiii
    [Show full text]
  • Atradition of Giants
    A TRADITION OF GIANTS The Elite Social Hierarchy of American Prehistory Narrative and Commentary Ross Hamilton 1 1 Page Copyright © 2007 by Ross Hamilton: All rights reserved. No portion of this book, except for brief review, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without written permission of the publisher. For information contact Ross Hamilton, 4202 Sibley Avenue, Silverton, Ohio—45236 Cover art courtesy of the Library of Congress; book design by Ross Hamilton. Title of work: A Tradition of Giants Alternative title: The Elite Social Hierarchy of American Prehistory Library of Congress registration number: TXu 1-608-346 Effective date of registration: November 19, 2007 Amendments and additions added 9-16-2012 2 2 Page The Great Peacemaker, Passaconeway Believed by some as perhaps the greatest Sachem who ever lived, Passaconeway was the last of the great kingly chiefs of old. He was a giant among men, physically and spiritually, believed to have stood at least seven feet in height. A powerful medicine man and chieftain of the Penacook tribe, Passaconeway was elected bashaba (emperor) of a confederation of tribes united to stem an aggressive Mohawk nation. In his twilight years this great man traveled in the Maine-New Hampshire-Massachusetts region where he was revered as the mouthpiece of the Great Spirit by both Native and European folk alike. Tradition stays that Passaconeway was a genius, gifted with magical or divine powers employed in his peacemaking efforts. His true power, however, lay in his ability to kindle the fire of peace and brotherly love in the hearts of all irrespective of race or tribal restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in Archaeology: a Review Author(S): Patrick E
    Science in Archaeology: A Review Author(s): Patrick E. McGovern, Thomas L. Sever, J. Wilson Myers, Eleanor Emlen Myers, Bruce Bevan, Naomi F. Miller, S. Bottema, Hitomi Hongo, Richard H. Meadow, Peter Ian Kuniholm, S. G. E. Bowman, M. N. Leese, R. E. M. Hedges, Frederick R. Matson, Ian C. Freestone, Sarah J. Vaughan, Julian Henderson, Pamela B. Vandiver, Charles S. Tumosa, Curt W. Beck, Patricia Smith, A. M. Child, A. M. Pollard, Ingolf Thuesen, Catherine Sease Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 99, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 79-142 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/506880 Accessed: 16/07/2009 14:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aia. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 2 Stage 1 Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey, Kent
    Wessex Archaeology Kingsborough Manor Phase 2 Stage 1 Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey, Kent Assessment of Archaeological Excavation Results Ref: 57170.01 October 2005 KINGSBOROUGH MANOR PHASE 2 STAGE 1 EASTCHURCH, ISLE OF SHEPPEY, KENT Assessment of Archaeological Excavation Results Prepared on behalf of Jones Homes (Southern) Ltd 3 White Oak Square Swanley Kent BR8 7AG by Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury SP4 6EB Report reference: 57170.01 October 2005 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2005 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 KINGSBOROUGH MANOR PHASE 2 STAGE 1 EASTCHURCH, ISLE OF SHEPPEY, KENT SUMMARY Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by Jones Homes (Southern) Ltd to conduct archaeological excavations on land associated with Phase 2 Stage 1 of an ongoing, low- density housing development. The Phase 2 Stage 1 site was located north east of Kingsborough Farm, Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey, Kent, and to the north west of Kingsborough Manor housing development Phase 1 (Fig. 1). Work was undertaken between July and September 2004 and was carried out as a condition of planning permission for the development granted by Swale District Council and pursuant to a specification issued by the Heritage Conservation Group of Kent County Council. This report provides a brief summary of the excavation results. The Site (NGR 597725 172394) comprised an area of land totalling approximately 15,759m² and was located to the north of Kingsborough Farm, 2km south-east of Minster and c. 1.25km to the north-west of the village of Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey. It occupies an elevated position on the Isle of Sheppey, close to the north eastern edge of a ridge extending east-west along the island, with commanding views to the north and east over the Thames and the Essex coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology: the Key Concepts Is the Ideal Reference Guide for Students, Teachers and Anyone with an Interest in Archaeology
    ARCHAEOLOGY: THE KEY CONCEPTS This invaluable resource provides an up-to-date and comprehensive survey of key ideas in archaeology and their impact on archaeological thinking and method. Featuring over fifty detailed entries by international experts, the book offers definitions of key terms, explaining their origin and development. Entries also feature guides to further reading and extensive cross-referencing. Subjects covered include: ● Thinking about landscape ● Cultural evolution ● Social archaeology ● Gender archaeology ● Experimental archaeology ● Archaeology of cult and religion ● Concepts of time ● The Antiquity of Man ● Feminist archaeology ● Multiregional evolution Archaeology: The Key Concepts is the ideal reference guide for students, teachers and anyone with an interest in archaeology. Colin Renfrew is Emeritus Disney Professor of Archaeology and Fellow of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge. Paul Bahn is a freelance writer, translator and broadcaster on archaeology. YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN THE FOLLOWING ROUTLEDGE STUDENT REFERENCE TITLES: Archaeology: The Basics Clive Gamble Ancient History: Key Themes and Approaches Neville Morley Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in the Greek World John Hazel Who’s Who in the Roman World John Hazel ARCHAEOLOGY The Key Concepts Edited by Colin Renfrew and Paul Bahn LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX 14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Recording Practices Guidelines for Archaeological Excavation and Recording Techniques
    Archaeological Recording Practices Guidelines for archaeological excavation and recording techniques www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk Contents This field training pack aims to support you with archaeological recording processes. These will include: Excavating a Feature 3 Recording Introduction 4 Recording Using Photography 6 Drawing Conventions 9 Drawing Sections 10 Drawing Plans 12 Levelling and Coordinates 14 Recording Cuts 16 Recording Deposits 17 Recording Interpretation 20 General Discussion 22 The Harris Matrix 23 Finds 26 Environmental Samples 27 Human Remains 29 Health and Safety 30 Glossary of Terms 31 2 Gemma Stewart 2013 Excavating a Feature Archaeological excavation is the primary means in which we gather information. It is critical that it is carried out carefully and in a logical manner. The flow chart below has been provided to show the steps required for fully excavating and recording a feature. Identify feature Clean area to find the extent of the feature Consider if pre-excavation photos and plan are required Select appropriate equipment Use nails and string to mark out section for excavation Excavate the feature/deposit carefully removing the latest context first If finds are present bag finds from each context separately Take environmental samples if necessary Remove any loose spoil and tidy feature ready for recording Take out numbers (context, section and plan) Photograph the feature/section Draw the section Draw the plan Measure levels Complete context sheets File paperwork 3 Recording Introduction Excavation results in the destruction of contexts, therefore, a detailed and correct record of the archaeology discovered is required in order to produce and maintain a permanent archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Atradition of Giants
    A TRADITION OF GIANTS The Elite Social Hierarchy of American Prehistory Narrative and Commentary Ross Hamilton 1 Page Copyright © 2007 by Ross Hamilton: All rights reserved. No portion of this book, except for brief review, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without written permission of the publisher. For information contact Ross Hamilton, 4202 Sibley Avenue, Silverton, Ohio—45236 Cover art courtesy of the Library of Congress; book design by Ross Hamilton. Title of work: A Tradition of Giants Alternative title: The Elite Social Hierarchy of American Prehistory Library of Congress registration number: TXu 1-608-346 Effective date of registration: November 19, 2007 Amendments and additions added 9-16-2012 2 Page The Great Peacemaker, Passaconeway Believed by some as perhaps the greatest Sachem who ever lived, Passaconeway was the last of the great kingly chiefs of old. He was a giant among men, physically and spiritually, believed to have stood at least seven feet in height. A powerful medicine man and chieftain of the Penacook tribe, Passaconeway was elected bashaba (emperor) of a confederation of tribes united to stem an aggressive Mohawk nation. In his twilight years this great man traveled in the Maine-New Hampshire-Massachusetts region where he was revered as the mouthpiece of the Great Spirit by both Native and European folk alike. Tradition stays that Passaconeway was a genius, gifted with magical or divine powers employed in his peacemaking efforts. His true power, however, lay in his ability to kindle the fire of peace and brotherly love in the hearts of all irrespective of race or tribal restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning
    Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Burtner, Marcus Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 04:13:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/268613 CRAFTING AND CONSUMING AN AMERICAN SONORAN DESERT: GLOBAL VISIONS, REGIONAL NATURE AND NATIONAL MEANING by Marcus Alexander Burtner ____________________________________ copyright © Marcus Alexander Burtner 2012 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2012 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Marcus A. Burtner entitled “Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature, and National Meaning.” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Katherine Morrissey ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Douglas Weiner ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jeremy Vetter ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jack C. Mutchler Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS of the MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES on INTERPRETATIONS of MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY by E
    A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETATIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY By ERIC DAVID SINGLETON Bachelor of Arts/Science in History The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2003 Master of Arts/Science in Museum Studies The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2008 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2017 A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY Dissertation Approved: Dr. L.G. Moses Dr. William S. Bryans Dr. Michael M. Smith Dr. F. Kent Reilly, III Dr. Stephen M. Perkins ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is true that nothing in this world is done alone. I would like to thank my family and friends for all their love and support. My grandparents, parents, sister, cousin, aunts and uncles. They were the foundation of everything that has shaped my life and allowed me the strength to complete this while working full-time. And, to my fiancée Kimberly. I mention her separately, not because she is not included above, but because she is the one person who diligently edited, listened, and gracefully sat by giving up years of vacations, holidays, and parties as I spent countless nights quietly writing. I would also give the most heartfelt thank you to Dr. Moses, Dr. McCoy, and Dr. Smith. Each of you made me the historian I am today. As Dr. James Ronda told me once, pick your professors, not the school—they will shape everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Caves Geology of Caves by W
    U.S. Department of the Interior / U.S. Geological Survey Geology of Caves Geology of Caves by W. E. Davies and I. M. Morgan A cave is a natural opening in the ground extending beyond the zone of light and large enough to permit the entry of man. Occurring in a wide variety of rock types and caused by widely differing geological proc­ esses, caves range in size from single small rooms to intercorinecting passages many miles long. The scientific study of caves is called speleology (from the Greek words spelaion for cave and logos for study). It is a composite science based on geology, hydrology, biology, and archaeology, and thus holds special interest for earth scientists of the U.S. Geological Survey. Caves have been natural attractions since prehistoric times. Prolific evidence of early man's interest has been discovered in caves scattered throughout the world. Fragments of skeletons of some of the earliest manlike creatures (Australopithecines) have been discovered in cave deposits in South Africa, and the first evidence of primitive Neander­ thal Man was found in a cave in the Meander Valley of Germany. Cro-Magnon Man created his remarkable murals on the walls of caves in southern France and northern Spain where he took refuge more than 10,000 years ago during the chill of the ice age. Interest in caves has not dwindled. Although firm figures for cave visitors are not available, in 1974 about 1.5 million people toured Mammoth Cave in Kentucky, and more than 670,000 visited Carlsbad Caverns in New Mexico, two of the most famous caves in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 第86冊 2020年(令和2年)03月31日発行
    ISSN 0543-3894 明治大学人文科学研究所紀要 第 86 冊 MEMOIRS OF THE INSTITUTE OF HUMANITIES MEIJI UNIVERSITY VOLUME 86 2020 年 3 月 明 治 大 学 人 文 科 学 研 究 所 明 治 大 学 人 文 科 学 研 究 所 ◎ 研究所長 豊 川 浩 一 Director TOYOKAWA Koichi ◎ 運営委員 池 田 喬 Committee IKEDA Takashi 石 黒 太 郎 ISHIGURO Taro 伊 藤 剣 ITO Ken 生 方 智 子 UBUKATA Tomoko 大 楠 栄 三 OGUSU Eizo 奥 香 織 OKU Kaori 織 田 哲 司 ODA Tetsuji 梶 原 照 子 KAJIWARA Teruko 釜 崎 太 KAMASAKI Futoshi 清 水 則 夫 SHIMIZU Norio 清 水 有 子 SHIMIZU Yuko 竹 内 拓 史 TAKEUCHI Takushi 内 藤 まりこ NAITO Mariko 中 川 秀 一 NAKAGAWA Shuichi 波照間 永 子 HATERUMA Nagako 波戸岡 景 太 HATOOKA Keita 牧 野 淳 司 MAKINO Astushi ワルド・ライアン WARD, Ryan. M 出版刊行委員会 委 員 長 梶 原 照 子 清 水 則 夫 委 員 奥 香 織 中 川 秀 一 牧 野 淳 司 明治大学人文科学研究所紀要 第87冊 2020年（令和2年）3 月31日 発行 発行者 豊川浩一 発行所 明治大学人文科学研究所 〒 101-8301 東京都千代田区神田駿河台 1-1 TEL 03-3296-4135 FAX 03-3296-4283 印刷所 アライ印刷株式会社 ISSN 0543-3894 ©2019 The Institute of Humanities, Meiji University PRINTED IN JAPAN 明治大学人文科学研究所紀要 第 86 冊 目 次 横組 《個人研究第 1 種》 オーストリア・イタリア国境地域における 越境的地域連携とそのガバナンス………………………………………………… 飯 嶋 曜 子 1 《個人研究第 1 種》 水虫からみる比較生活文化論の試み ―日本におけるその社会的文化的背景への一考察に向けて…………………… 眞 嶋 亜 有 35 《個人研究第 1 種》 一流スポーツクライミング選手のトレーニング方法に関する調査研究………… 水 村 信 二 75 《個人研究第 1 種》 ディアスポラの民の信仰 ― サンテリアのイファの思想と実践 ………………… 越 川 芳 明 107 《個人研究第 1 種》 クレテイユ映画の前線 ～Tellement proches における階層、日常、ユダヤ性 … 清 岡 智比古 151 《特別研究第 2 種》 古墳時代考古学の国際化……………………………………………………………… 佐々木 憲 一 197 《特別研究第 2 種》 狂信主義と無道徳主義：R.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Study of Two Grave Excavation Methods: Arbitrary Level Excavation and Stratigraphic Excavation
    STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research ISSN: (Print) 2054-8923 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ysta20 An experimental study of two grave excavation methods: Arbitrary Level Excavation and Stratigraphic Excavation Laura Helen Evis, Ian Hanson & Paul Nicholas Cheetham To cite this article: Laura Helen Evis, Ian Hanson & Paul Nicholas Cheetham (2016): An experimental study of two grave excavation methods: Arbitrary Level Excavation and Stratigraphic Excavation, STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, DOI: 10.1080/20548923.2016.1229916 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2016.1229916 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 12 Sep 2016. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ysta20 Download by: [University of Exeter] Date: 12 September 2016, At: 06:42 Research article An experimental study of two grave excavation methods: Arbitrary Level Excavation and Stratigraphic Excavation Laura Helen Evis1* , Ian Hanson2, and Paul Nicholas Cheetham3 1Lecturer in Physical Anthropology, University of Exeter, Archaeology Department, Laver Building, Streatham Campus, North Park Road, Exeter, Devon, UK 2Deputy Director of Forensic Science for Anthropology and Archaeology, International Commission on Missing Persons, Alipasin 45a, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina 3Senior Lecturer in Archaeological Science, Bournemouth University, Department of Archaeology, Anthropology and Forensic Science, Talbot Campus, Poole, UK Abstract The process of archaeological excavation is one of destruction. It normally provides archaeologists with a singular opportunity to recognise, define, extract and record archaeological evidence: the artefacts, features and deposits present in the archaeological record.
    [Show full text]