Capacity Building Issue Brief Implementation Team Developing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Capacity Building Issue Brief Implementation Team Developing Capacity Building Issue Brief Implementation Team When your organization received technical assistance (TA) or a grant from the federal Partnership for Sustainable Communities through EPA or HUD, it became eligible to participate in capacity building services. These services will help you gain access to technical experts and additional resources to support the successful implementation of your grant. Reconnecting America is leading the team that will focus on the implementation of planning activities. Other team members are Strategic Economics, the Center for Neighborhood Technology, Enterprise Community Partners, the Center for Creative Land Recycling and Kim Burnett Consulting. Team Implementation will be providing a range of targeted, collective and one-on-one activities, best practices, case studies and resources to support all Sustainable Communities grantees with implementation efforts. The following issue brief is the first in the implementation series. The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an award with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and findings of the work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government. Developing Corridor Plans for Implementation Introduction Transportation planning commonly occurs along corridors, and the corridor is the natural home of transit, including both buses and fixed-guideway lines like light rail, subways, streetcars, and BRT. However, land use planning and planning for smart growth and TOD is more often accomplished at the station area or city scale. Using the corridor to link transit planning with land use and TOD planning can be a game changer in terms of implementing successful transportation and land use implementation. Why Do TOD Planning At The Corridor Scale? Regions that have made and maintained this link over time have seen transit become an organizing principle for development, with local jurisdictions identifying the areas around transit stations as their own development nodes. Because transit and transportation investments can change market dynamics along a corridor by providing new access to neighborhoods and centers, the corridor is a useful place to begin thinking about the market potential of different nodes. Corridor planning can also be cost-effective for cities and regions, especially when multiple stations along a corridor face similar challenges and opportunities. Corridor planning presents an enormous opportunity to engage stakeholders early in the process. The excitement surrounding a new transit investment can attract a diverse group of stakeholders, and decision-making about the best alignments is achieved when a broad group of stakeholders is involved early on. Corridor scale planning is easily married to phased implementation and investment plans, which identify when and where public dollars should be invested to support local TOD goals, whether the intent is to facilitate market-driven projects or to direct the velocity and trajectory of neighborhood change. 1 DISCLAIMER: The information presented on this page are those of the author and do not reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government. Inclusion of these reports on the HUD USER web site does not mean an endorsement of these institutions or their viewpoints. Capacity Building Issue Brief // Implementation // Developing Corridor Plans for Implementation September 2012 / Page 2 of 8 With the continued demand for and build out of new transit projects, understanding the benefits that corridor planning for land use and TOD can provide is even more critical. In 2011, Reconnecting America identified 643 transit projects that were being planned, proposed, or were under construction in 106 regions in the US. While many of those projects may not ultimately be constructed, the sheer number of places demanding more transit options in their communities points to the potential for accompanying land use transformation. However, that potential comes with a need to understand how corridor planning can facilitate not only successful transportation outcomes but also successful land use and TOD. Further, corridor planning for land use and TOD can: Clarify the corridor type and its function within the regional network; Enhance an understanding about the roles of different station areas along the corridor, and how increased connectivity and transportation choices can benefit residents of all incomes; Enable planners to understand how development along the corridor should be phased, and the land uses and development intensity that is most appropriate at each station; Provide regions that are planning or extending transit corridors with a better sense of what to expect in terms of development; Prioritize high-potential stations for development and investment; and Broaden the perspective on both regional needs and local needs. Defining a Corridor for Land Use and TOD Planning Defining a corridor for land use and TOD implementation is a little different than defining one for transit or transportation. Instead of focusing on the street or railway, the corridor should be defined as a series of nodes. The image to the left shows the half-mile circles around stations along a light rail line. Together, these nodes make up the corridor that should be considered for planning and implementation purposes. Any transit technology can serve as the basis for planning at the corridor scale – heavy or light rail, streetcar, trolley or bus. Different transit technologies will define different areas of influence. For example, the area of influence along light and heavy rail corridors is typically a half-mile radius around stations. Because streetcars can stop as often as every street corner they tend to have a stronger influence on development all along the line and a few blocks on either side. Planning for nodes along bus corridors might be a ¼ mile from bus stops, depending on the frequency and number of stops the route makes. However, the overall TOD potential at nodes along a corridor depends more on the design and quality of service than it does on the transit technology. High-quality service for all transit technologies should be defined as high-frequency service along dedicated lanes or rights of way that serve to “fix” the line and provide certainty for developers and investors that transit service will not be moved to another corridor. TOD potential is also determined by the walkability and bikeability of nodes, the presence of retail amenities, and the local and regional housing market. 2 DISCLAIMER: The information presented on this page are those of the author and do not reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government. Inclusion of these reports on the HUD USER web site does not mean an endorsement of these institutions or their viewpoints. Capacity Building Issue Brief // Implementation // Developing Corridor Plans for Implementation September 2012 / Page 3 of 8 Corridor Destinations Impact Land Use and TOD Potential This brief discusses three corridor types that are useful for understanding the potential for land use and TOD at nodes along a corridor. Each corridor type is defined by what it connects and how these connections influence the overall potential for land use and TOD. Different corridor types create different land use and TOD opportunities. While this categorization of types serves to advance corridor analysis and planning, real transit corridors cannot be so easily categorized and tend to be a mix of types. Destination Connectors: Destination connectors link residential neighborhoods to multiple activity centers, including employment, medical and commercial centers and academic campuses. Because they make these connections, these transit corridors consistently result in high ridership, creating a “win” for transit agencies while building regional support for future transit investments. Destination connectors encourage ridership in both directions throughout the day because they serve 9-to-5 employment centers as well as other destinations. Examples: The Health Line BRT in Cleveland is one example of a destination connector. The Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor connects a series of job centers in Arlington County, Virginia, to the urban core of Washington D.C. Phoenix’s light rail line connects the city’s downtown to Arizona State University, and Houston’s Red Line connects the downtown to the Medical Center and Rice University. Implications for Land Use and TOD: The demand for new development will likely be highest in station areas identified as “destinations,” especially if they are walkable, higher-intensity activity centers with good connections to surrounding neighborhoods. Higher-density development is more likely to occur along destination connector corridors due to increased market demand for locations with access to job and activity centers.1 Auto-oriented job centers or malls along the corridor may require new pedestrian-oriented street and building design before they become truly transit-accessible, even if they are very close to stations. Providing easy pedestrian and bicycle access to stations will encourage higher transit ridership, especially at employment centers where people are less inclined to walk long
Recommended publications
  • 2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom
    2018 Streetcar Summit Westin New Orleans – Canal Place All Sessions in the Grand Ballroom Sunday, April 15, 2018 4:00 – 5:00 pm The Next Generation: Conversations between students from local universities and experts in the field 5:00 – 7:00 pm Reception at the Hotel Monday, April 16, 2018 8:00 – 9:00 am Registration, Check in and Breakfast 9:00 – 10:00 am Welcome and brief updates on projects DJ Baxter, SOJ, Chair Community Streetcar Coalition Board 10:00 – 10:30 am Legislative Update Jeff Boothe, Executive Director, Community Streetcar Coalition 10:30 – 10:45 am Break 10:45 – 12:00 pm Evolving Technology – Off-Wire Vehicles and Autonomous Streetcars Moderator: Barbara Schroeder, Alstom Transport Curtis Ailes, City of Seattle Jim Barbaresso, HNTB Mark Dorn, AECOM 12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch 1:30 – 3:00 pm Evolving Role of Streetcars in Urban Transit Systems Moderator: Ethan Melone, Parsons Robin Aredondo-Savage, Vice Mayor, City of Tempe, AZ Jeff Boothe, Boothe Transit Consulting Tom Gerend, Kansas City Streetcar Authority Keith Jones, RATP Dev America, Washington DC Streetcar Luis Mota, Valley Metro 3:00 – 4:15 pm Planning for the next 10-100 years: Stories from the Veterans Moderator: Jeff Boothe, Community Streetcar Coalition Dan Bower, Executive Director, Portland Streetcar, Inc. Chris Eilerman, City of Seattle Adelee Le Grand, Transdev, New Orleans 4:15 – 4:45 pm Statistics Tracked – what do we choose and why? DJ Baxter, SOJ, Chair Community Streetcar Coalition Board 4:45 – 5:15 pm Opening 2018! – Special look at the new systems opening
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma City Bus Rapid Transit Benefit Cost Analysis
    Northwest Multimodal Transportation Corridor Concept Plan Northwest Multimodal Transportation Corridor Concept Plan This page intentionally left blank Northwest Multimodal Transportation Corridor Concept Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 Concept Background .................................................................................................................... 5 OKC and USDOT Beta Test........................................................................................................ 10 Online Tour of Health in the Corridor ...................................................................................... 11 Oklahoma County Health Scorecard ........................................................................................ 12 Other Background Information and Maps ............................................................................... 13 Transit Treatments/Technologies (BRT & Streetcar) ............................................................ 13 Pedestrian / Bicycle Treatments ............................................................................................... 18 Automobile Treatments ............................................................................................................. 21 Concept Recommendations....................................................................................................... 22 One: Additional Outreach with Stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • Data Acquisition & Display Technology for Streetcar Systems
    Data Acquisition & Display Technology for Streetcar Systems: A Case Study Stanley Feinsod Business Development Manager Transit Systems Engineering Emeryville, CA Streetcar System Controls • Communications to/from operators • Passenger information • Status of service • Status of electrification • Status of equipment • Emergency and incident management • Maintaining headway and frequency Desired Functionality • Traction power – Substation status-control – Status of breakers and switches – Ability to quickly de-energize sections – Alarms and fault tracking – Action logs Desired Functionality • Operations - Monitor and Control – Track individual trains-sectional occupancy – Direction of travel-route – Intersection monitoring – Station locations – Two way communications – Incident management – Headway and spacing management – Data acquisition and reports Desired Functionality • Passenger Information – Schedule – Arrival times – Canned messages from central – Special messages – addressed to individual stations or all stations – Messages inside cars – Visual messaging and audible messaging Central Office-Operations Control Center • Real time - command and control • Visual data • Communications technology • System management • Hands on operations management SCADA Software Installation for the Oklahoma City Streetcar System • What is the Nucleus Command System? • How Rail Systems benefit from SCADA software • How OKC’s Streetcar system is monitored and controlled • Lessons learned from the OKC Streetcar Project • Discussion & Q/A What is the Nucleus
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2015 COMMUTER CORRIDORS STUDY FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2015 PREPARED FOR: Association of Central Oklahoma Governments PREPARED BY: URS Corporation CentralOK!go Steering Committee – October 2014 City of Oklahoma City, Hon. Mick Cornett, Mayor –Chair City of Del City, Hon. Brian Linley, Mayor City of Del City, Hon. Ken Bartlett, Councilmember City of Edmond, Hon. Victoria Caldwell, Councilmember City of Edmond, Hon. Elizabeth Waner, Councilmember City of Midwest City, Hon. Jack Fry, Mayor City of Midwest City, Hon. Rick Dawkins, Councilmember City of Moore, Hon. Jason Blair, Vice-Mayor City of Norman, Hon. Cindy Rosenthal, Mayor City of Norman, Hon. Tom Kovach, Councilmember City of Oklahoma City, Hon. Pete White, Councilmember Cleveland County, Hon. Rod Cleveland, Commissioner Oklahoma County, Hon. Willa Johnson, Commissioner Oklahoma House of Representatives, Hon. Charlie Joyner, Representative District 95 Association of Central Oklahoma Governments, John G. Johnson, Executive Director American Fidelity Foundation, Tom J. McDaniel, President BancFirst, Jay Hannah, Executive Vice President-Financial Services Central Oklahoma Transportation and Parking Authority Board, Kay Bickham, Trustee Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Corporate Development and Government Relations Devon Energy Corporation, Klaholt Kimker, Vice President–Administration Greater OKC Chamber of Commerce, Roy Williams, President The Humphreys Company, Blair Humphreys, Developer KME Traffic and Transportation, Ken Morris, President NewView Oklahoma, Lauren
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Streetcar Summit Tucson University Park Hotel
    2019 Streetcar Summit Tucson University Park Hotel Sunday, February 24, 2019 3:00 – 5:00 pm Local Host Day – Tucson Streetcar Steve Farley, Former State Senator, Arizona Albert Elias, Assistant City Manager for City of Tucson Shellie Ginn, Deputy Director, Tucson Department of Transportation Monday, February 25, 2019 8:00 – 9:00 am Registration, Check in and Breakfast 9:00 – 10:00 am Welcome and brief updates on projects Adelee Le Grand, Transdev, President, Community Streetcar Coalition Board Diana Alarcon, Tucson Department of Transportation 10:00 – 10:30 am Legislative Update Jeff Boothe, Executive Director, Community Streetcar Coalition 10:30 – 10:45 am Break 10:45 – 12:00 pm Lessons Learned from Recent Startups Moderator: Stan Feinsod, Transit Systems Engineering Carl Jackson, El Paso, TX Jesse Rush, Embark, Oklahoma City, OK David Windsor, Milwaukee, WI 12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch 1:30 – 3:00 pm Managing Cost Growth Moderator: Ethan Melone, Parsons Steve Bethel, RATP Dev Luis Mota, Valley Metro Paul Pattison, Kimley-Horn Jake Speck, Kiewit Infrastructure 3:00 – 3:15 pm Break 3:15 – 4:15 pm Increasing Operational Efficiency Moderator: Dan Bower, Portland Streetcar, Inc. Kharlie Barnaby, Herzog, Oklahoma City Streetcar Steve Bethel, Tucson Streetcar Howard Chang, DC Streetcar 4:15 – 5:00 pm Updates from Projects in Project Development & Construction Moderator: Gerald Francis, Keolis Commuter Services Cleve Cleveland, Orange County Chris Eilerman, City of Seattle Wulf Grote, Valley Metro Tonia Wimberly, City of Charlotte 5:30 – 7:00 pm Reception
    [Show full text]
  • Planokc Connectokc.Pdf
    Our Situation . 156 Streets and Roadways .. 156 Transit . 160 Bicycle Facilities . 162 Trails . 163 Sidewalks . 164 Airports . 166 Freight . 166 Our Plan . 167 Our Goals . 167 Our Initiatives . 168 INTERSTATE 40 AND THE SKYDANCE BRIDGE Master planning for the Core to Shore redevelopment and relocation of Interstate 40 placed very high priority on bridging what could have been a barrier, using trans- portation of all sorts to link Downtown, a new develop- ment area, and the Riverfront. 154 around that tended to cause people to live and work system has a role to play. connectokc presents Our Situation closer together (walking and streetcars) with the car, initiatives and policies that will help create this Transportation is Oklahoma City's circulatory which encourages and requires dispersal. The car gives balanced, interconnected access network, designed to system, as critical to the city's life as our circulatory us the independence to go where and when we please. create more efficient movement patterns, a healthier systems are to our own lives. Without the ability to But as we know, relying on auto transportation also community, and new opportunities for economic move people and goods from place to place, our city produces development patterns that are expensive development. cannot function. But as important as basic mobility is, to serve, congestion on major streets, and harmful transportation's influence goes even deeper. It has a emissions into the atmosphere. Streets and Roadways huge impact on land value, location of development, and the look and feel of the city. It can expand It is also clear that transportation preferences are The street system is our largest public capital asset, or limit economic opportunity and affect the cost undergoing change both locally and nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 SSO Workshop Introduction of Ssoas
    2018 SSO Program Workshop Introduction of State Safety Oversight Agency Attendees Dr. Alfonz Ruth Office of Administration Federal Transit Administration May 15, 2018 ARIZONA Arizona Department of Transportation Valley Metro Valley Metro Rail Light Rail Streetcar* City of Tucson Sun Link Streetcar 2 ARKANSAS Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Rock Region Metro Metro Streetcar Streetcar 3 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Bay Area Rapid Transit BART Heavy Rail Automated Guideway Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Rail Light Rail Heavy Rail North County Transit District SPRINTER Hybrid Rail Orange County Transportation Authority OC Streetcar Streetcar* Continued on Next Page 4 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. Riverfront Authority Downtown Riverfront Streetcar Streetcar* Sacramento Regional Transit District Regional Transit Light Rail San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Trolley Light Rail 5 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Muni Metro Light Rail Cable Car Streetcar Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Light Rail 6 COLORADO Colorado Public Utilities Commission Regional Transportation District RTD Rail Light Rail 7 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. Fire and Emergency Management Services D.C. Department of Transportation DC Streetcar Streetcar 8 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARYLAND VIRGINIA Tri-State Oversight Committee Metrorail Safety Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Transit System Overview and Gap Analysis
    Final Report Oklahoma Transit System Overview and Gap Analysis June 2012 Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation Prepared by: Oklahoma Transit System Overview and Gap Analysis Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................................................................................................ ES-1 1. Transit System Overview ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Current Statewide Passenger Transportation Initiatives ......................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 Oklahoma City Initiatives—MAPS 3 ............................................................................ 1-3 1.2.2 Tulsa Transportation Initiatives .................................................................................. 1-6 1.2.3 Intercity Bus ................................................................................................................ 1-8 1.2.4 Passenger Rail Service ................................................................................................. 1-9 1.2.5 Other Passenger Transportation Services and Initiatives .......................................... 1-18 1.3 Existing Oklahoma Transit Systems........................................................................................ 1-19 1.3.1 Potential to Link
    [Show full text]
  • Community Streetcar Coalition News Clips
    April 12 – April 19, 2018 COMMUNITY STREETCAR COALITION NEWS CLIPS COMPILED BY BROADCAST CLIPS Oklahoma City KOCO April 18, 2018 LINK: https://bit.ly/2Hc1L7B The Oklahoma City streetcar project, 60% complete. That’s the update from the MAPS 3 program manager. There will be 22 stops, with the car arriving every 12 to 14 minutes. Some of the cars have already arrived here in Oklahoma City; they’re being tested on a closed track. Remember, voters approved a sales tax for this project back in 2009. Norfolk WVEC April 16, 2018 LINK: https://bit.ly/2HAgegY In just a couple of hours we’ll learn more about different options to expand public transportation in Norfolk. HRT had been discussing expanding The Tide on the city’s west side for years, but that’s not happening. Now, HRT is looking at expanding light rail, adding a streetcar or buses to the east side. What led to this shift? The study focused on the west side of the city, which is near Gent and ODU. But they saw several challenges in that study, including flooding, issues with bridges and the interstate over the Lafayette River. Based on the research, HRT recommends the city adopt a no-build for the west side of Norfolk, near ODU and Gent. HRT says the study also found only around 5,000 new riders would use the extension of either bus, light rail or streetcar on an average weekday by 2040, and they don’t think that’s enough to get federal funding, which is very competitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Cityscape September 2018
    CityScape SEPTEMBER 2018 | ISSUE 10 | AN UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS MOVING OKC FORWARD Oklahoma City sees economic and retail growth in first half of 2018 Oklahoma City continues to draw investment from major companies thanks to its strong business climate, low cost of doing business and continued investment in quality-of-life projects. In May, Amazon announced its first Oklahoma fulfillment center would be located in Oklahoma City. The company plans to build a 600,000-square-foot, state-of-the-art facility that will employ more than 1,500 people. The facility will be located near Will Rogers World Airport in the Lariat Landing development on S Portland Avenue. “A facility bringing more than 1,500 new jobs is a monumental announcement,” said Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt. “This is a great day for Oklahoma City, and we’re thrilled to welcome Amazon’s investment in our community. A facility bringing more than “I’m also thrilled to see this facility plant its flag in south OKC,” Holt 1,500 new jobs is a monumental continued. “It’s good for the whole city and we look forward to the catalyst we know this project will be for its immediate surroundings in announcement. This is a great south OKC.” day for Oklahoma City, and we’re The center will receive and fulfill customer orders. Employees at the fulfillment center will pick, pack and ship small items to customers such thrilled to welcome Amazon’s as books, household items and toys. Oklahoma City is also home to an Amazon sorting center, which sorts packaged customer orders by ZIP investment in our community.
    [Show full text]
  • VTA Daily News Coverage for Monday, January 8, 2018 1
    From: VTA Board Secretary Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 3:07 PM To: VTA Board of Directors Subject: From VTA: January 8, 2018 Media Clips VTA Daily News Coverage for Monday, January 8, 2018 1. VTA introduces new fare app (Mountain View Voice) 2. Bill could add millions of new homes next to California's public transit stations (Silicon Valley Business Journal) 3. Here's what German rail exec says California high-speed rail needs to succeed (Silicon Valley Business Journal) 4. Openings and Construction Starts Planned for 2018 TheTransportPolitic.com VTA introduces new fare app (Mountain View Voice) The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority has unveiled a new, free mobile payment app called EZfare. The app, available for both Android and iPhone, allows transit riders to purchase single rides, day passes and express passes. Single ride fares that are purchased on the app are valid for two hours and include free transfers on buses and VTA's light-rail system. If any part of a rider's two-hour trip includes an express bus, express bus fare will be required. On their website, VTA officials use Levi's Stadium event fare as an example of a ticket that can be purchased. They emphasize the importance of checking the app prior to travel since ticket options do vary by event. Any purchases will be saved in the app history so that riders can access stored, active and expired tickets at any time. Rider history can also be accessed on other smart devices using the account created with the app and a function called "Retrieve My Tickets." Riders can view current pricing for cash or prepaid fares at vta.org/getting-around/fares.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Streetcar Coalition News Clips
    October 5-11, 2018 COMMUNITY STREETCAR COALITION NEWS CLIPS COMPILED BY BROADCAST CLIPS Milwaukee WTMJ October 10, 2018 LINK: https://bit.ly/2pRapRP There are now eleven lawsuits in the works for injuries involving the Milwaukee streetcar tracks. There's an open house for The Hop happening right now at Ogden and Prospect. The purpose of today’s open house is to show off how the hop is going to be accessible to people with disabilities. Right now there are actually several people inside The Hop learning about the features, including a spot designated just for wheelchairs. Even though The Hop is going to be accessible to all people, some people are having a tough time navigating around the tracks. “This is a hazard.” Law firm Hupy and Abraham is now working with 11 clients who say they've been hurt by the street car tracks. All of the incidents happening within about the last 3 months. Attorney Michael Hupy says all of his clients got their tires stuck in the street car tracks and fell off. 7 people were on motorcycles, 4 riding a bike. “Crossing the tracks at an angle vs. trying to ride parallel to the tracks is important.” Most of the incidents happened on the tracks near Milwaukee public market or on Ogden Avenue near Prospect. All 11 clients are now filing a notice of injury with the city of Milwaukee hoping to get reimbursed for their injuries. Yesterday one of the streetcars was damaged when someone parked on the streetcar lined opened their door, hitting the streetcar.
    [Show full text]