Interpreting Cancer Genomes Using Systematic Host Perturbations By
LETTER doi:10.1038/nature11288 Interpreting cancer genomes using systematic host network perturbations by tumour virus proteins Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen1,2,3*, Rahul C. Deo1,4,5*,MeghaPadi1,6,7*, Guillaume Adelmant1,4,8*, Michael A. Calderwood1,9,10,11, Thomas Rolland1,9,10, Miranda Grace1,12,Ame´lie Dricot1,9,10, Manor Askenazi1,4,8, Maria Tavares1,2,3,8,SamuelJ.Pevzner9,10,13, Fieda Abderazzaq1,6, Danielle Byrdsong1,9,10, Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis9,10, Alyce A. Chen1,12, Jingwei Cheng2,3,MickCorrell6, Melissa Duarte1,9,11,ChangyuFan1,9,10, Mariet C. Feltkamp14, Scott B. Ficarro1,4,8, Rachel Franchi1,9,15, Brijesh K. Garg1,4,8, Natali Gulbahce1,9,16,17,TongHao1,9,10, Amy M. Holthaus1,11,RobertJames1,9,10, Anna Korkhin1,2,3, Larisa Litovchick1,2,3, Jessica C. Mar1,6,7,TheodoreR.Pak18, Sabrina Rabello1,3,9,16, Renee Rubio1,6,YunShen1,9,10, Saurav Singh4,8, Jennifer M. Spangle1,12, Murat Tasan1,4,18, Shelly Wanamaker9,10,15, James T. Webber4,8, Jennifer Roecklein-Canfield9,15,EricJohannsen1,11, Albert-La´szlo´ Baraba´si1,3,9,16,RameenBeroukhim3,19,20, Elliott Kieff1,11, Michael E. Cusick1,9,10, David E. Hill1,9,10, Karl Mu¨nger1,12, Jarrod A. Marto1,4,8,JohnQuackenbush1,6,7, Frederick P. Roth1,4,9,18, James A. DeCaprio1,2,3 & Marc Vidal1,9,10 Genotypic differences greatly influence susceptibility and resist- which DNA tumour virus proteins physically target the products of ance to disease. Understanding genotype–phenotype relationships RB1 or TP53, two well-established germline-inherited and somatically requires that phenotypes be viewed as manifestations of network inactivated tumour-suppressor genes6.
[Show full text]