Who Destroyed Ashkelon? on Some Problems in Relating Text to Archaeology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Who Destroyed Ashkelon? on Some Problems in Relating Text to Archaeology WHO DESTROYED ASHKELON? ON SOME PROBLEMS IN RELATING TEXT TO ARCHAEOLOGY Hans M. Barstad The destruction of Ashkelon by Nebuchadnezzar in 604 bce appears to belong among the better-known facts of scholarship.1 At least this is what we may learn when presented with the secondary literature in the area. Since publications are numerous, however, I can only mention a couple of the more recent studies in the present context. Quite representative, and particularly influential, of course, are some of the more prestigious encyclopaedias of our subject. According to David Schloen, the Philistine period ended with Nebuchadnezzar’s destruction of the city in 604 bce. Schloen also claims that: Evidence has also been found for the final fiery destruction of Philistine Ash- kelon in 604 bce, including the complete skeleton of one of the victims of the disaster lying amid the burnt debris.2 And Lawrence Stager writes: “In 604 bce, Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Ashkelon and led Aga’, the last king of Philistine Ashkelon, into exile in Babylon.”3 1 The Jubilar and the present author have spent much time in the Isaiah scroll. I am very grateful that I can offer these few lines on another common interest. 2 See David Schloen, “Ashkelon,” in OEANE 1:222. 3 See Lawrence E. Stager, “Ashkelon,” in NEAEHL 1:104. Since this article provides a fine survey of prevalent views concerning the destruction of Ashkelon, I will comment and quote from it in some detail. In Stager’s NEAEHL essay, there is very little documenta- tion for Iron II (p. 107) whereas the Persian period is the richest on the site (pp. 107–108). There is no mention of the Babylonian period under ’excavation results,’ which indicates that little relevant to the Neo-Babylonian period has been found. Under ’history’ (p. 104), Stager writes: “In the seventh century bce Ashkelon was ruled by Mitinti II, son of Sidqa, a vassal of Esarhaddon and of Ashurbanipal. After the decline of the Assyrian empire in the West, first the Egyptians (in the time of Psamtik I) and then the Babylonians gained ascendancy. In 604 bce, Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Ashkelon and led Aga’, the last king of Philistine Ashkelon, into exile in Babylon. The sons of Aga’, sailors, and various nobles received rations from Nebuchadnezzar. Herodotus (I, 103–106) reports that Scythian sol- diers sacked the temple of Aphrodite Ouriana (the Celestial Aphrodite) at Ashkelon, which was considered by the Greeks to be the ’oldest temple consecrated to this deity.’ Because Scythians served in Nebuchadnezzar’s army, it is possible that Herodotus singled out this episode to epitomize the general destruction of Ashkelon by the Babylonians in 604 bce Mopsus, seer and hero of the Trojan war, reached Ashkelon and died there (according to 346 hans m. barstad Quite characteristic is also the following quotation taken from Donald Redford: Meanwhile, in the same month, Nebuchadnezzar invested Ashkelon. Before the end of December it had been captured and utterly destroyed. Antimeni- das, a Greek mercenary and brother of the poet Alcaeus, was serving with the Babylonian army on this occasion; and a fragment of Alcaeus in honor of his brother’s homecoming describes the awful fate of the city, many of whose inhabitants had been sent to the House of Hades. The remaining population together with Aga the king was deported to Babylonia, where an expatriate community calling itself ’Ashkelon’ was to be found in the following century. The uninhabited ruins were to stand a haunt for the wild beasts for over a hundred years, a mute witness to the Babylonian fury.4 Ephraim Stern writes laconically that Nebuchadnezzar conquered Ash- kelon in 604 bce, and “took its king captive, destroyed the city, and deported all its inhabitants.”5 Daniel M. Master also considers the destruc- tion of Ashkelon during the Neo-Babylonian period to be an historical fact: . when Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Ashkelon in 604 bce. Nebuchadnezzar claims to have made the site a ’tell,’ and recent archaeological excavations have shown that he accomplished his goal.6 We notice from the few, but fairly representative, quotations above, how Schloen refers to evidence for the final fiery destruction of Philistine Ash- kelon; Stager writes that the city was destroyed; Redford that it was utterly destroyed, and that all inhabitants were deported to Babylon; Stern that all inhabitants were deported; Master that the destruction made the city the fifth-century bce Lydian historian Xanthos). Under the Persians, Ashkelon became a ’city of the Tyrians’ and the headquarters of a Tyrian governor (Pseudo-Scylax, Periplus I, 78, late fourth century bce). The Phoenicians curried favors from their Persian overlords by providing naval power and maritime wealth. Coastal cities as far south as Ashkelon grew rich from Phoenician commerce . .” (p. 104). 4 Donald B. Redford, Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times (Princeton, NJ: Prince- ton University Press, 1992), 455–56. 5 Ephraim Stern, Archaeology of the Land of the Bible. Vol. 2. The Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian Periods 732–332 bce (ABRL; New York: Doubleday, 2001), 304. 6 Daniel M. Master, “Trade and Politics: Ashkelon’s Balancing Act in the Seventh Century bce,” BASOR 330 (2003): 47–64, 61. Master, in another essay, dates a market place at Ashkelon in the following way: “The date of this market is secure because fills beneath it contain East Greek Wild Goat II pottery, creating a terminus post quem for the foundation of the market of at least 625 bce Moreover, the end of the Ashkelon market is marked by the comprehensive destruction wrought by Nebuchadnezzar in 604 bce” Daniel M. Master, “From the Buqê’ah to Ashkelon,” in Exploring the Longue Durée. Essays in Honor of Lawrence E. Stager (ed. J. David Schloen; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2009), 305–17, 312. .
Recommended publications
  • The Mediterranean Coast of Israel Is a New City,Now Under
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Theses and Major Papers Marine Affairs 12-1973 The editM erranean Coast of Israel: A Planner's Approach Sophia Professorsky University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ma_etds Part of the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Professorsky, Sophia, "The eM diterranean Coast of Israel: A Planner's Approach" (1973). Theses and Major Papers. Paper 146. This Major Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Marine Affairs at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Major Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. l~ .' t. ,." ,: .. , ~'!lB~'MEDI'1'ERRANEAN-GQAsT ~F.~"IsMt~·;.·(Al!~.oS:-A~PROACH ::".~~========= =~.~~=~~~==b======~~==~====~==.=~=====~ " ,. ••'. '. ,_ . .. ... ..p.... "".. ,j,] , . .;~ ; , ....: ./ :' ",., , " ",' '. 'a ". .... " ' ....:. ' ' .."~".,. :.' , v : ".'. , ~ . :)(A;R:t.::·AF'~~RS'· B~NMi'»APER. '..":. " i . .: '.'-. .: " ~ . : '. ". ..." '-" .~" ~-,.,. .... .., ''-~' ' -.... , . ", ~,~~~~"ed .' bYr. SOph1a,Ji~ofes.orsJcy .. " • "..' - 01 .,.-~ ~ ".··,::.,,;$~ld~~:' ·to,,:" f;~f.... ;)J~:Uexa~d.r . -". , , . ., .."• '! , :.. '> ...; • I ~:'::':":" '. ~ ... : .....1. ' ..~fn··tr8Jti~:·'btt·,~e~Mar1ne.~a1~S·~r~~. ", .:' ~ ~ ": ",~', "-". ~_"." ,' ~~. ;.,·;·X;'::/: u-=" .. _ " -. • ',. ,~,At:·;t.he ,un:lvers:U:~; tif Rh~:<:rs1..J\d. ~ "~.; ~' ~.. ~,- -~ !:).~ ~~~ ~,: ~:, .~ ~ ~< .~ . " . -, -. ... ... ... ... , •• : ·~·J;t.1l9ston.l~~;&:I( .. t)eceiDber; 1~73.• ". .:. ' -.. /~ NOTES, ===== 1. Prior to readinq this paper, please study the map of the country (located in the back-eover pocket), in order to get acquain:t.ed with names and locations of sites mentioned here thereafter. 2.- No ~eqaJ. aspects were introduced in this essay since r - _.-~ 1 lack the professional background for feedinq in tbe information.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency in Israel
    Emergency in Israel Emergency Update on Jewish Agency Programming May 16, 2021 The recent violent events that have erupted across the country have left us all surprised and stunned: clashes with Palestinians in Jerusalem and on the Temple Mount; the deteriorating security tensions and the massive barrage of missiles from Gaza on southern and central Israel; and the outbreak of unprecedented violence, destruction, and lynching in mixed cities and Arab communities. To say that the situation is particularly challenging is an understatement. We must all deal with the consequences of the current tensions. Many of us are protecting family, coworkers, or people under our charge while missiles fall on our heads night and day, forcing us to seek shelter. We have all witnessed the unbearable sights of rioting, beating, and arson by Arab and Jewish extremists in Lod, Ramla, Acre, Kfar Qassem, Bat Yam, Holon, and other places. As an organization that has experienced hard times of war and destruction, as well as periods of prosperity and peace, it is our duty to rise up and make a clear statement: we will support and assist populations hit by missile fire as we did in the past, after the Second Lebanon War and after Operations Cast Lead and Protective Edge. Together with our partners, we will mobilize to heal and support the communities and populations affected by the fighting. Our Fund for Victims of Terror is already providing assistance to bereaved families. When the situation allows it, we will provide more extensive assistance to localities and communities that have suffered damage and casualties.
    [Show full text]
  • Summaries of the Trojan Cycle Search the GML Advanced
    Document belonging to the Greek Mythology Link, a web site created by Carlos Parada, author of Genealogical Guide to Greek Mythology Characters • Places • Topics • Images • Bibliography • PDF Editions About • Copyright © 1997 Carlos Parada and Maicar Förlag. Summaries of the Trojan Cycle Search the GML advanced Sections in this Page Introduction Trojan Cycle: Cypria Iliad (Synopsis) Aethiopis Little Iliad Sack of Ilium Returns Odyssey (Synopsis) Telegony Other works on the Trojan War Bibliography Introduction and Definition of terms The so called Epic Cycle is sometimes referred to with the term Epic Fragments since just fragments is all that remain of them. Some of these fragments contain details about the Theban wars (the war of the SEVEN and that of the EPIGONI), others about the prowesses of Heracles 1 and Theseus, others about the origin of the gods, and still others about events related to the Trojan War. The latter, called Trojan Cycle, narrate events that occurred before the war (Cypria), during the war (Aethiopis, Little Iliad, and Sack of Ilium ), and after the war (Returns, and Telegony). The term epic (derived from Greek épos = word, song) is generally applied to narrative poems which describe the deeds of heroes in war, an astounding process of mutual destruction that periodically and frequently affects mankind. This kind of poetry was composed in early times, being chanted by minstrels during the 'Dark Ages'—before 800 BC—and later written down during the Archaic period— from c. 700 BC). Greek Epic is the earliest surviving form of Greek (and therefore "Western") literature, and precedes lyric poetry, elegy, drama, history, philosophy, mythography, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Shīʿī History in Palestine
    Timeline of Shīʿī History in Palestine Umayyads – Early second/eighth century: People from Palestine send a convoy to the Imām Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq. ʿAbbāsids – Second half of the third/ninth century: The geographer al-Yaʿqūbī mentions the settlement of the Shīʿī ʿĀmila tribe in the Jund Filasṭīn. – 271/884: Muḥammad b. Ḥamza, a descendant of al-ʿAbbās b. ʿAlī, is murdered in Tiberias by Ṭughj b. Juff the Ikhshīdid. – 289–90/902–03: The Ismāʿīlī mahdī of Salamiyya, ʿAbdallāh al-Mahdī, hides in Ramla. – First half of the fourth/tenth century: The Persian Shīʿī poet Kushājim sojourns in Ramla. Fāṭimids – Second half of the fourth/tenth century: The geographer Muḥammad al-Maqdisī complains that all Tiberias, half of Nablus, and Qadas are Shīʿīs. – 360–67/970–77: The Qarmaṭī invasion of Palestine is centered in Ramla. – 363–64/973–74: Authorities imposed Shīʿī customs in Palestine, two Sunnīs from Ramla and Jerusalem who opposed it were detained and tortured. – 386/996: Shīʿī messianic rebellion of Abū l-Futūḥ Ḥasan b. Jaʿfar, the amīr of Mecca in Ramla. – First half of the fifth/eleventh century: – Shīʿī genealogist Najm al-Dīn al-ʿUmarī travels through Ramla, and mentions several Ṭālibiyyūn (descendants of the Imāms) in Jerusalem, Tiberias, and Ramla. – The Sunnī Ibn Ḥazm al-Andalusī complains that all of Urdunn (that is, Galilee), mainly Tiberias, is controlled by the Nuṣayrīs (now ʿAlawīs). – Druzes/Ḥākimī spread propaganda in Galilee (al-Buqayʿa) and Ḥamza’s oppo- nents are mentioned in Acre. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004421028_015 Yaron Friedman - 9789004421028 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 04:13:15AM via free access Timeline 203 – Mid-fifth/eleventh century: The traveler Nāṣir Khusraw mentions Shīʿīs in Tiberias and Fāṭimid investment and construction projects in Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • 2624 Israel 0I-07-3C
    ANCIENT ISRAEL REVEALED June 16 - July 3, 2007 Saturday, June 16: CHICAGO/TEL AVIV Depart Chicago in the evening. Sunday, June 17: JERUSALEM: David Citadel Hotel We arrive into Ben Gurion Airport and drive up to Jerusalem to Dear Members and Friends of the Oriental Institute: rest before our orientation lecture and dinner. (D) The Oriental Institute is pleased to present a comprehensive Monday, June 18: JERUSALEM: David Citadel Hotel tour of Israel. Uniquely situated at the crossroads of cultures, Touring begins on the Mt. of Olives and Mt. Scopus. Viewing Israel is among the most historically rich areas in the world. The Jerusalem from this perspective gives us an understanding of the Oriental Institute has had an archaeological presence there historical ramifications of its location. We enter the Old City at the Citadel built by Herod, and begin our historical overview from its since the early 1900s, when founder James Henry Breasted sent walls. Today’s Old City touring will focus on the First Temple an expedition to excavate at the site of Megiddo. The dig period including Hezekiah’s fortifications and the City of David, covered a span in time from 5000 to 600 BC. Each layer was where excavations have exposed the city and shaft leading to the carefully uncovered to reveal successive cultures that city’s water supply in the Kidron Valley. We will examine dominated the city. In 2005, the Haas and Schwartz Megiddo Hezekiah’s Tunnel, built through the rock to divert the water into Gallery opened at the Oriental Institute Museum, featuring an inner city reservoir, the Gihon Spring and pool of Siloam.
    [Show full text]
  • XI. St. Paul's Road from Cilicia to Iconium
    PAULINE AND OTHER STUDIES IN EARLY CHRISTIAN HISTORY BY W. M. RAM SAY, HoN. D.C.L., ETC. PROF~~SOR OF HUMANITY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN HODDER AND STOUGHTON LONDON MCMVI XI ST. PAUL'S ROAD FROM CILICIA TO I CONIUM XI ST. PAUL'S ROAD FROM CILICIA TO !CONIUM THE western part of Cilicia is a triangular plain, whose b}lse is the sea, and whose apex lies in a corner formed by the Taurus Mountains bounding Cilicia on the north. In the apex the river Saros issues from its wonderfully romantic course of more than a hundred miles through the lofty Taurus and enters the low sea plain. There was a time when this level plain was a great gulf of the sea. The gulf has been gradually filled up by the two great Cilician rivers, the Pyramos and the Saros, probably aided by slight elevations of the level of the land ; 1 and of the two rivers the Saros has been the chief agent in determining the character of the plain. The road from Syria and the East enters the western Cilician plain by a pass through which the Pyramos also enters the plain. At the western end of this pa:ss the river turns down towards the south, and the road crosses it by a large bridge (Fig. ro). The crossing has always been a highly important point in all military operations in Cilicia. A gar­ rison and a fortress had to be placed there to guard the passage of the river. Thus arose the city of Mopsou-Hestia, "the Hearth of Mopsus" (the Greek prophet and interpreter of the will of the Greek god Apollo, who marks the advance of the old Ionian colonists into the Cilician land).
    [Show full text]
  • The Motif of Desolation in Nineteenth-Century Exploration of Palestine
    The Motif of Desolation in Nineteenth-Century Exploration of Palestine Michael Press In 1858, the London firm John Murray published what was probably the first modern travel guide to Palestine. Murray specialized in travel literature; their travel handbooks were the forerunners of the famous Blue Guides. The Palestine guide was written by Josias Leslie Porter, an Irish Presbyterian missionary who had been resident in Damascus for nearly a decade, and was based on his own travels through Palestine in the 1850s. Among the sites he visited (in 1858) was ‘Asqalān – that is, Ashkelon of the Bible, Ascalon of classical and Crusader history, which lay abandoned since its final destruction in 1270 CE. Porter described his first view of the site, after climbing up the earthen ramparts of the city, in this way (from the 1868 edition): Clambering up the broken battlements, we have Ascalon spread out before us—no! not Ascalon, only the place where it once stood. The northern and larger section of the site is now covered with gardens, divided by rough stone fences, and filled with vines, pomegranates, figs, and apricots, in addition to luxuriant beds of onions and melons. Scarcely a fragment of a ruin can be seen from this spot except the broken wall. As I sat here one morning I counted 5 yokes of oxen ploughing, 2 drawing water for irrigation, and 28 men and women engaged in agricultural work! Such is one section of Ascalon. The remaining portion is even more terribly desolate.1 The description is remarkable. Porter immediately follows a fairly detailed report on the thriving fields and gardens of Ashkelon with the implication that they are “terribly desolate.” What explains what seems, to us, such an unexpected characterization? This paper is the beginning of an attempt to articulate an answer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Christian's Map of the Holy Land
    A CHRISTIAN'S MAP OF THE HOLY LAND Sidon N ia ic n e o Zarefath h P (Sarepta) n R E i I T U A y r t s i Mt. of Lebanon n i Mt. of Antilebanon Mt. M y Hermon ’ Beaufort n s a u b s s LEGEND e J A IJON a H Kal'at S Towns visited by Jesus as I L e o n Nain t e s Nimrud mentioned in the Gospels Caesarea I C Philippi (Banias, Paneas) Old Towns New Towns ABEL BETH DAN I MA’ACHA T Tyre A B a n Ruins Fortress/Castle I N i a s Lake Je KANAH Journeys of Jesus E s Pjlaia E u N s ’ Ancient Road HADDERY TYRE M O i REHOB n S (ROSH HANIKRA) A i KUNEITRA s Bar'am t r H y s u Towns visited by Jesus MISREPOTH in K Kedesh sc MAIM Ph a Sidon P oe Merom am n HAZOR D Tyre ic o U N ACHZIV ia BET HANOTH t Caesarea Philippi d a o Bethsaida Julias GISCALA HAROSH A R Capernaum an A om Tabgha E R G Magdala Shave ACHSAPH E SAFED Zion n Cana E L a Nazareth I RAMAH d r Nain L Chorazin o J Bethsaida Bethabara N Mt. of Beatitudes A Julias Shechem (Jacob’s Well) ACRE GOLAN Bethany (Mt. of Olives) PISE GENES VENISE AMALFI (Akko) G Capernaum A CABUL Bethany (Jordan) Tabgha Ephraim Jotapata (Heptapegon) Gergesa (Kursi) Jericho R 70 A.D. Magdala Jerusalem HAIFA 1187 Emmaus HIPPOS (Susita) Horns of Hittin Bethlehem K TIBERIAS R i Arbel APHEK s Gamala h Sea of o Atlit n TARICHAFA Galilee SEPPHORIS Castle pelerin Y a r m u k E Bet Tsippori Cana Shearim Yezreel Valley Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Trip Brochure
    Concordia University – Seward, Nebraska The Holy Land May 27 – June 10, 2021 15 Days Study Tour hosted by Dr. Mark Meehl, Professor of Theology tour of the Holy Land is the trip of a lifetime. The tour includes free time for you to explore and ADuring our Holy Land Study Tour 2021 you savor the atmosphere of Jerusalem at your own will encounter the land of the Bible on three levels. pace as well as experiencing a worship service First, you will see the traditional sites associated in the thirteenth-century Crusader Chapel in the with the Bible and visit archaeological excava- Old City. Come to the Holy Land with us, enjoy tions that will flesh out your picture of the ancient the camaraderie and fellowship of the tour, and history of the region. Second, you will meet and return with a wealth of new insights into the Bible talk with the people of the land – Palestinians and and its world. Israelis; Christians, Jews and Muslims - in a variety of settings to provide context and relevance to the Dr. Mark Meehl has participated in excavations events that occur in this land today. Finally, you in Israel, Jordan, and Syria. He lived in Jerusalem will embark on a devotional journey that will add for two and a half years, serving as Program Di- depth to your spiritual life for years to come. Our rector for the Albright Institute of Archaeological Holy Land Study Tour 2021 has been designed Research, before coming to Concordia University to be a pilgrimage in many senses of the word, in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Second Century Gate at Perge and Its Literary Associations
    Rev. do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, São Paulo, 7: 49-64, 1997. THE ROMAN SECOND CENTURY GATE AT PERGE AND ITS LITERARY ASSOCIATIONS William E. Mierse* MIERSE, W.E. The Roman second century gate at Perge and its literary associations. Re v. do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, São Paulo, 7: 49-64, 1997. RESUMO: O artigo visa demonstrar como a entrada romana do século II d.C. da cidade de Perge, na Ásia Menor, pertence a um conjunto arquitetônico harmônico, construído a partir de um programa artístico mais amplo. Assim, os vários elementos que compõem esta entrada (pátios, nichos e esculturas, colunadas) são analisados à luz de suas possíveis associações com os estilos de pintura mural e de composições literárias, adquirindo uma coerên­ cia única. UNITERMOS: Arte romana - Arte provincial - Arquitetura romana na Ásia Menor. The Gate at Perge The ruins of the ancient city of Perge (7t£pyr|) site slightly inland of the Pamphylian coast of south Turkey, 16km east of Antalya (Figure 1). The site was first discussed by Lanckoronski (1980:61) and then excavated and published by A. M. Mansel (1949, 1956, 1975a, 1975b) and more recently by Jale Inan. Strabo (14.4.2) describes the site. The city was founded following the end of the Trojan War by emigrants from Argos led by the seers Kalchas and Mopsus and the hero Amphilochus. To date, the excavations have revealed no evidence of an archaic settlement at the site. The first mention of the town is the forth century periplus city date from Seleucid times. The old Hellenistic attributed to Scyta of Caryanda.
    [Show full text]
  • Lachish Fortifications and State Formation in the Biblical Kingdom
    Radiocarbon, Vol 00, Nr 00, 2019, p 1–18 DOI:10.1017/RDC.2019.5 © 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona LACHISH FORTIFICATIONS AND STATE FORMATION IN THE BIBLICAL KINGDOM OF JUDAH IN LIGHT OF RADIOMETRIC DATINGS Yosef Garfinkel1* • Michael G Hasel2 • Martin G Klingbeil2 • Hoo-Goo Kang3 • Gwanghyun Choi1 • Sang-Yeup Chang1 • Soonhwa Hong4 • Saar Ganor5 • Igor Kreimerman1 • Christopher Bronk Ramsey6 1Institute of Archaeology, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel 2Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University, USA 3Seoul Jangsin University, Korea 4Institute of Bible Geography of Korea, Korea 5Israel Antiquities Authority, Israel 6Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, UK ABSTRACT. When and where the process of state formation took place in the biblical kingdom of Judah is heavily debated. Our regional project in the southwestern part of Judah, carried out from 2007 to the present, includes the excavation of three Iron Age sites: Khirbet Qeiyafa, Tel Lachish, and Khirbet al-Ra’i. New cultural horizons and new fortification systems have been uncovered, and these discoveries have been dated by 59 radiometric determinations. The controversial question of when the kingdom was able to build a fortified city at Lachish, its foremost center after Jerusalem, is now resolved thanks to the excavation of a previously unknown city wall, dated by radiocarbon (14C) to the second half of the 10th century BCE. KEYWORDS: Iron Age, Kingdom of Judah, Khirbet al-Ra’i, Khirbet Qeiyafa, Lachish, radiometric chronology. INTRODUCTION The debate over the chronology of the Iron Age is one of the central controversies in the current scholarship of the archaeology of the southern Levant as well as biblical studies.
    [Show full text]