Timeline of Shīʿī History in Palestine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Timeline of Shīʿī History in Palestine Timeline of Shīʿī History in Palestine Umayyads – Early second/eighth century: People from Palestine send a convoy to the Imām Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq. ʿAbbāsids – Second half of the third/ninth century: The geographer al-Yaʿqūbī mentions the settlement of the Shīʿī ʿĀmila tribe in the Jund Filasṭīn. – 271/884: Muḥammad b. Ḥamza, a descendant of al-ʿAbbās b. ʿAlī, is murdered in Tiberias by Ṭughj b. Juff the Ikhshīdid. – 289–90/902–03: The Ismāʿīlī mahdī of Salamiyya, ʿAbdallāh al-Mahdī, hides in Ramla. – First half of the fourth/tenth century: The Persian Shīʿī poet Kushājim sojourns in Ramla. Fāṭimids – Second half of the fourth/tenth century: The geographer Muḥammad al-Maqdisī complains that all Tiberias, half of Nablus, and Qadas are Shīʿīs. – 360–67/970–77: The Qarmaṭī invasion of Palestine is centered in Ramla. – 363–64/973–74: Authorities imposed Shīʿī customs in Palestine, two Sunnīs from Ramla and Jerusalem who opposed it were detained and tortured. – 386/996: Shīʿī messianic rebellion of Abū l-Futūḥ Ḥasan b. Jaʿfar, the amīr of Mecca in Ramla. – First half of the fifth/eleventh century: – Shīʿī genealogist Najm al-Dīn al-ʿUmarī travels through Ramla, and mentions several Ṭālibiyyūn (descendants of the Imāms) in Jerusalem, Tiberias, and Ramla. – The Sunnī Ibn Ḥazm al-Andalusī complains that all of Urdunn (that is, Galilee), mainly Tiberias, is controlled by the Nuṣayrīs (now ʿAlawīs). – Druzes/Ḥākimī spread propaganda in Galilee (al-Buqayʿa) and Ḥamza’s oppo- nents are mentioned in Acre. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004421028_015 Yaron Friedman - 9789004421028 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 04:13:15AM via free access Timeline 203 – Mid-fifth/eleventh century: The traveler Nāṣir Khusraw mentions Shīʿīs in Tiberias and Fāṭimid investment and construction projects in Palestine. – 410–16/1019–25: The Shīʿī scholar Muḥammad al-Karājukī, student of Shaykh al- Mufīd, settles in Ramla. – 467/1074: The Turkish Atsiz Ibn Uwaq al-Khwarizmī invades Palestine and massa- cres the population of Tiberias (including Shīʿīs); Turcomans resettle the deserted Ramla with local Sunnī farmers. – 471/1078: The Fāṭimids recapture Palestine. – 484/1090: Badr al-Jamālī claims that he found the head of Ḥusayn b. ʿAlī in Ashkelon. His son al-Afḍal erected the Mashhad al-Ra ʾs (lit., ‘the mausoleum of the head’). – 485–93/1092–99: Muḥammad b. al-ʿArabī of Granada, passing through Palestine, engages in polemical discussions with Imāmī and Bāṭinī (Ismāʿīlī) Shīʿīs in Acre and Tiberias. Crusaders – 495/1101: The crusaders destroy a Shīʿī library in Haifa founded by Asʿad b. Abī Rawḥ from Tripoli (Lebanon). – Sixth/twelfth century: Crusaders turn the shrine of ʿĀlī b. Abī Tālib in ʿayn al-baqara (lit., ‘fountain of the cow’) in Acre, into a church, then regret their actions and leave the site. – 549/1153: The head of Ḥusayn is transferred from Ashkelon, which was captured by crusaders, to Cairo. – 570/1174: The Persian traveler al-Harawī described Mashhad al-Ra ʾs, which still ex- isted in Ashkelon, though there was no longer a Shīʿī population. Ayyūbids – End of the sixth/twelfth century: Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn captures the tomb of Sukayna in Tiberias, and renews its sanctity from the Fāṭimid period and turn it into a Sunnī sanctuary. – 583/1187: Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn destroys Ramla and Tiberias, two towns that had key Shīʿī communities in the past. – 587/1191: Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn destroys Ashkelon and transfers the minbar of the head of Ḥusayn mausoleum to Hebron. Yaron Friedman - 9789004421028 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 04:13:15AM via free access 204 Timeline Mamlūks – Mid seventh/thirteenth century: The Persian geographer Zakariyyā al-Qazwīnī mentions Sunnī veneration of Mashhad al-Ra ʾs in Ashkelon. – 694/1294: The Mamlūk governor of Safed has inscriptions made on the tomb of Sukayna in Tiberias and makes it a waqf – Eighth/fourteenth century: – The Black Death strikes the population of Palestine. – The Ḥanbalī scholar Ibn Taymiyya writes in a fatwā his refutation of the Mashhad al-Ra ʾs in Ashkelon. – First half of the eighth/fourteenth century: – The geographer Ibn Baṭūṭṭa describes the Mashhad al-Ra ʾs in Ashkelon, but notes the absence of Shīʿīs. – Muḥammad Jamāl al-Dīn al-Makkī (“the first shahīd”) passes through Palestine, and does not mention a Shīʿī population. – The Sunnī geographer Shams al-Dīn al-Dimashqī and the historians al-ʿUthmānī and al-Qalqashandī mention Shīʿīs in the district of Safed (including Hūnīn), after a silence of two centuries, during which Muslim scholars did not mention their presence in the region. Ottomans – Tenth/sixteenth century: Zayn al-Dīn b. ʿAlī al-Jubāʿī al-ʿĀmilī (“the second shahīd”) passes through Palestine, and does not mention a Shīʿī population. – Between the years 928/1521 and 930/1523: The Italian rabbi Moshe Bāsola mentions the tomb of Sukayna in Tiberias as that of Rachel, the wife of Rabi Akiva. – End of the eleventh/seventeenth century: Collapse of the Druze Maʿn rule in north- ern Palestine, while the Ottomans are preoccupied with wars against Russia. – Twelfth/eighteenth century: Pro-Ottoman historians Sulaymān al-Muḥāsinī and Khalīl al-Murādī complain about the Shīʿī population in the district of Safed. – 1163/1749: Battle near Tirbīkha between the two leaders, Sunnī Ẓāhir al-ʿUmar and Shīʿī Nāṣīf al-Naṣṣār over the control of Shīʿī villages in northern Galilee. – 1164/1751 and again in 1182/1768: A peace treaty is signed between Ẓāhir al-ʿUmar and Nāṣīf al-Naṣṣār in Acre, leaving the Shīʿī villages under al-Naṣṣār’s control. – 1166/1752: al-Naṣṣār builds the mosque of Hūnīn. – 1185/1771: Following al-Naṣṣār’s victory over ʿUthmān Pasha, al-Naṣṣār builds the shrine of al-Nabī Yūshaʿ, becoming the most important Shīʿī site in Palestine. – 1190/1776 and 1195/1780: Al-Jazzār, governor of Acre, launchs punitive campaigns against the Shīʿī villages in Galilee and southern Lebanon. Yaron Friedman - 9789004421028 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 04:13:15AM via free access Timeline 205 – Between 1293/1876 and 1306/1888: The Ottoman governor Raʾūf Pasha rebuilds the long-neglected mashhad of Ḥusayn, still as a Sunnī in Ashkelon. British Mandate – 1922: A British census shows 156 Shīʿī Matāwlīs living in Palestine, mostly in al-Baṣṣa. – 1923: Following border changes, seven Shīʿī villages in Palestine are transmitted from the French to the British Mandate, adding 3,191 Shīʿīs to their population. Prior to the 1948 war (together with al-Baṣṣa) their population was more than 4,770 people. – 1948: During the Israeli War of Independence Shīʿīs from Palestine, mainly from Mālkiyya, volunteer to fight in Fawzī l-Qawuqjī’s Arab Liberation Army. – Negotiations take place between Shīʿī Matāwlī leaders of Hūnīn and the kibbutz of Kfar Giladi, but fail. – The Matāwlīs of Galilee become refugees in Lebanon. State of Israel – 1998: A delegation of the Ismāʿīlī Dāwūdī Bohrās locate the cornerstone of the last shrine of the head of Ḥusayn, and receive authorization from Israel to build a mod- est open marble site for pilgrims. – 2000: A few Shīʿīs, ex-soldiers from the South Lebanese Army, and their families settled in Israel following its withdrawal from southern Lebanon and the disman- tling of the SLA. – A temporary spread of Shīʿism in Galilee, mainly in Dabūriyya, following the sec- ond Israeli-Lebanese war (2006) and Hizbullah’s declaration of victory. – 2008: The municipality of Ashkelon posts a sign near the site the Bohrās make pil- grimages to in Ashkelon, explaining the history of the head of Ḥusayn. – 2012: Palestinian solidarity with Hizbullah and conversions to Shīʿism among Israeli Arabs diminish following the organization’s involvement in the Syrian war. – 2014: The Shīʿī organization called al-Ṣābirīn, sponsored by Iran, is established in Gaza. – 2016: Hamas movement in Gaza limits al-Ṣābirīn’s activity. – 2019: Hizbullah’s leader in Lebanon still threatens to fight against Israel to recapture the seven Shīʿī villages in the Galilee. Yaron Friedman - 9789004421028 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 04:13:15AM via free access.
Recommended publications
  • The Mediterranean Coast of Israel Is a New City,Now Under
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Theses and Major Papers Marine Affairs 12-1973 The editM erranean Coast of Israel: A Planner's Approach Sophia Professorsky University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ma_etds Part of the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Professorsky, Sophia, "The eM diterranean Coast of Israel: A Planner's Approach" (1973). Theses and Major Papers. Paper 146. This Major Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Marine Affairs at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Major Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. l~ .' t. ,." ,: .. , ~'!lB~'MEDI'1'ERRANEAN-GQAsT ~F.~"IsMt~·;.·(Al!~.oS:-A~PROACH ::".~~========= =~.~~=~~~==b======~~==~====~==.=~=====~ " ,. ••'. '. ,_ . .. ... ..p.... "".. ,j,] , . .;~ ; , ....: ./ :' ",., , " ",' '. 'a ". .... " ' ....:. ' ' .."~".,. :.' , v : ".'. , ~ . :)(A;R:t.::·AF'~~RS'· B~NMi'»APER. '..":. " i . .: '.'-. .: " ~ . : '. ". ..." '-" .~" ~-,.,. .... .., ''-~' ' -.... , . ", ~,~~~~"ed .' bYr. SOph1a,Ji~ofes.orsJcy .. " • "..' - 01 .,.-~ ~ ".··,::.,,;$~ld~~:' ·to,,:" f;~f.... ;)J~:Uexa~d.r . -". , , . ., .."• '! , :.. '> ...; • I ~:'::':":" '. ~ ... : .....1. ' ..~fn··tr8Jti~:·'btt·,~e~Mar1ne.~a1~S·~r~~. ", .:' ~ ~ ": ",~', "-". ~_"." ,' ~~. ;.,·;·X;'::/: u-=" .. _ " -. • ',. ,~,At:·;t.he ,un:lvers:U:~; tif Rh~:<:rs1..J\d. ~ "~.; ~' ~.. ~,- -~ !:).~ ~~~ ~,: ~:, .~ ~ ~< .~ . " . -, -. ... ... ... ... , •• : ·~·J;t.1l9ston.l~~;&:I( .. t)eceiDber; 1~73.• ". .:. ' -.. /~ NOTES, ===== 1. Prior to readinq this paper, please study the map of the country (located in the back-eover pocket), in order to get acquain:t.ed with names and locations of sites mentioned here thereafter. 2.- No ~eqaJ. aspects were introduced in this essay since r - _.-~ 1 lack the professional background for feedinq in tbe information.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency in Israel
    Emergency in Israel Emergency Update on Jewish Agency Programming May 16, 2021 The recent violent events that have erupted across the country have left us all surprised and stunned: clashes with Palestinians in Jerusalem and on the Temple Mount; the deteriorating security tensions and the massive barrage of missiles from Gaza on southern and central Israel; and the outbreak of unprecedented violence, destruction, and lynching in mixed cities and Arab communities. To say that the situation is particularly challenging is an understatement. We must all deal with the consequences of the current tensions. Many of us are protecting family, coworkers, or people under our charge while missiles fall on our heads night and day, forcing us to seek shelter. We have all witnessed the unbearable sights of rioting, beating, and arson by Arab and Jewish extremists in Lod, Ramla, Acre, Kfar Qassem, Bat Yam, Holon, and other places. As an organization that has experienced hard times of war and destruction, as well as periods of prosperity and peace, it is our duty to rise up and make a clear statement: we will support and assist populations hit by missile fire as we did in the past, after the Second Lebanon War and after Operations Cast Lead and Protective Edge. Together with our partners, we will mobilize to heal and support the communities and populations affected by the fighting. Our Fund for Victims of Terror is already providing assistance to bereaved families. When the situation allows it, we will provide more extensive assistance to localities and communities that have suffered damage and casualties.
    [Show full text]
  • 2624 Israel 0I-07-3C
    ANCIENT ISRAEL REVEALED June 16 - July 3, 2007 Saturday, June 16: CHICAGO/TEL AVIV Depart Chicago in the evening. Sunday, June 17: JERUSALEM: David Citadel Hotel We arrive into Ben Gurion Airport and drive up to Jerusalem to Dear Members and Friends of the Oriental Institute: rest before our orientation lecture and dinner. (D) The Oriental Institute is pleased to present a comprehensive Monday, June 18: JERUSALEM: David Citadel Hotel tour of Israel. Uniquely situated at the crossroads of cultures, Touring begins on the Mt. of Olives and Mt. Scopus. Viewing Israel is among the most historically rich areas in the world. The Jerusalem from this perspective gives us an understanding of the Oriental Institute has had an archaeological presence there historical ramifications of its location. We enter the Old City at the Citadel built by Herod, and begin our historical overview from its since the early 1900s, when founder James Henry Breasted sent walls. Today’s Old City touring will focus on the First Temple an expedition to excavate at the site of Megiddo. The dig period including Hezekiah’s fortifications and the City of David, covered a span in time from 5000 to 600 BC. Each layer was where excavations have exposed the city and shaft leading to the carefully uncovered to reveal successive cultures that city’s water supply in the Kidron Valley. We will examine dominated the city. In 2005, the Haas and Schwartz Megiddo Hezekiah’s Tunnel, built through the rock to divert the water into Gallery opened at the Oriental Institute Museum, featuring an inner city reservoir, the Gihon Spring and pool of Siloam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Motif of Desolation in Nineteenth-Century Exploration of Palestine
    The Motif of Desolation in Nineteenth-Century Exploration of Palestine Michael Press In 1858, the London firm John Murray published what was probably the first modern travel guide to Palestine. Murray specialized in travel literature; their travel handbooks were the forerunners of the famous Blue Guides. The Palestine guide was written by Josias Leslie Porter, an Irish Presbyterian missionary who had been resident in Damascus for nearly a decade, and was based on his own travels through Palestine in the 1850s. Among the sites he visited (in 1858) was ‘Asqalān – that is, Ashkelon of the Bible, Ascalon of classical and Crusader history, which lay abandoned since its final destruction in 1270 CE. Porter described his first view of the site, after climbing up the earthen ramparts of the city, in this way (from the 1868 edition): Clambering up the broken battlements, we have Ascalon spread out before us—no! not Ascalon, only the place where it once stood. The northern and larger section of the site is now covered with gardens, divided by rough stone fences, and filled with vines, pomegranates, figs, and apricots, in addition to luxuriant beds of onions and melons. Scarcely a fragment of a ruin can be seen from this spot except the broken wall. As I sat here one morning I counted 5 yokes of oxen ploughing, 2 drawing water for irrigation, and 28 men and women engaged in agricultural work! Such is one section of Ascalon. The remaining portion is even more terribly desolate.1 The description is remarkable. Porter immediately follows a fairly detailed report on the thriving fields and gardens of Ashkelon with the implication that they are “terribly desolate.” What explains what seems, to us, such an unexpected characterization? This paper is the beginning of an attempt to articulate an answer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Christian's Map of the Holy Land
    A CHRISTIAN'S MAP OF THE HOLY LAND Sidon N ia ic n e o Zarefath h P (Sarepta) n R E i I T U A y r t s i Mt. of Lebanon n i Mt. of Antilebanon Mt. M y Hermon ’ Beaufort n s a u b s s LEGEND e J A IJON a H Kal'at S Towns visited by Jesus as I L e o n Nain t e s Nimrud mentioned in the Gospels Caesarea I C Philippi (Banias, Paneas) Old Towns New Towns ABEL BETH DAN I MA’ACHA T Tyre A B a n Ruins Fortress/Castle I N i a s Lake Je KANAH Journeys of Jesus E s Pjlaia E u N s ’ Ancient Road HADDERY TYRE M O i REHOB n S (ROSH HANIKRA) A i KUNEITRA s Bar'am t r H y s u Towns visited by Jesus MISREPOTH in K Kedesh sc MAIM Ph a Sidon P oe Merom am n HAZOR D Tyre ic o U N ACHZIV ia BET HANOTH t Caesarea Philippi d a o Bethsaida Julias GISCALA HAROSH A R Capernaum an A om Tabgha E R G Magdala Shave ACHSAPH E SAFED Zion n Cana E L a Nazareth I RAMAH d r Nain L Chorazin o J Bethsaida Bethabara N Mt. of Beatitudes A Julias Shechem (Jacob’s Well) ACRE GOLAN Bethany (Mt. of Olives) PISE GENES VENISE AMALFI (Akko) G Capernaum A CABUL Bethany (Jordan) Tabgha Ephraim Jotapata (Heptapegon) Gergesa (Kursi) Jericho R 70 A.D. Magdala Jerusalem HAIFA 1187 Emmaus HIPPOS (Susita) Horns of Hittin Bethlehem K TIBERIAS R i Arbel APHEK s Gamala h Sea of o Atlit n TARICHAFA Galilee SEPPHORIS Castle pelerin Y a r m u k E Bet Tsippori Cana Shearim Yezreel Valley Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Trip Brochure
    Concordia University – Seward, Nebraska The Holy Land May 27 – June 10, 2021 15 Days Study Tour hosted by Dr. Mark Meehl, Professor of Theology tour of the Holy Land is the trip of a lifetime. The tour includes free time for you to explore and ADuring our Holy Land Study Tour 2021 you savor the atmosphere of Jerusalem at your own will encounter the land of the Bible on three levels. pace as well as experiencing a worship service First, you will see the traditional sites associated in the thirteenth-century Crusader Chapel in the with the Bible and visit archaeological excava- Old City. Come to the Holy Land with us, enjoy tions that will flesh out your picture of the ancient the camaraderie and fellowship of the tour, and history of the region. Second, you will meet and return with a wealth of new insights into the Bible talk with the people of the land – Palestinians and and its world. Israelis; Christians, Jews and Muslims - in a variety of settings to provide context and relevance to the Dr. Mark Meehl has participated in excavations events that occur in this land today. Finally, you in Israel, Jordan, and Syria. He lived in Jerusalem will embark on a devotional journey that will add for two and a half years, serving as Program Di- depth to your spiritual life for years to come. Our rector for the Albright Institute of Archaeological Holy Land Study Tour 2021 has been designed Research, before coming to Concordia University to be a pilgrimage in many senses of the word, in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Lachish Fortifications and State Formation in the Biblical Kingdom
    Radiocarbon, Vol 00, Nr 00, 2019, p 1–18 DOI:10.1017/RDC.2019.5 © 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona LACHISH FORTIFICATIONS AND STATE FORMATION IN THE BIBLICAL KINGDOM OF JUDAH IN LIGHT OF RADIOMETRIC DATINGS Yosef Garfinkel1* • Michael G Hasel2 • Martin G Klingbeil2 • Hoo-Goo Kang3 • Gwanghyun Choi1 • Sang-Yeup Chang1 • Soonhwa Hong4 • Saar Ganor5 • Igor Kreimerman1 • Christopher Bronk Ramsey6 1Institute of Archaeology, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel 2Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University, USA 3Seoul Jangsin University, Korea 4Institute of Bible Geography of Korea, Korea 5Israel Antiquities Authority, Israel 6Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, UK ABSTRACT. When and where the process of state formation took place in the biblical kingdom of Judah is heavily debated. Our regional project in the southwestern part of Judah, carried out from 2007 to the present, includes the excavation of three Iron Age sites: Khirbet Qeiyafa, Tel Lachish, and Khirbet al-Ra’i. New cultural horizons and new fortification systems have been uncovered, and these discoveries have been dated by 59 radiometric determinations. The controversial question of when the kingdom was able to build a fortified city at Lachish, its foremost center after Jerusalem, is now resolved thanks to the excavation of a previously unknown city wall, dated by radiocarbon (14C) to the second half of the 10th century BCE. KEYWORDS: Iron Age, Kingdom of Judah, Khirbet al-Ra’i, Khirbet Qeiyafa, Lachish, radiometric chronology. INTRODUCTION The debate over the chronology of the Iron Age is one of the central controversies in the current scholarship of the archaeology of the southern Levant as well as biblical studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Jerusalem
    THE HISTORY OF JERUSALEM 1 Prepared by Ilana Epstein and Simon Goulden, US Living & Learning, May 2015/אייר תשע"ה Biblical quotations are from www.mechon-mamre.org 2 In its long history Jerusalem has been: . Destroyed at least twice . Besieged 23 times . Attacked 52 times . Captured and recaptured 44 times 3 Chalcolithic Period • The first settlement was established near the Gichon Spring 4 Middle Bronze Age The Book of Bereshit 14:18, mentions a city called Salem, which mefarashim (commentators) such as the Ramban (d. 1270) identifies as Jerusalem, ruled by King Melchizedek, probably a title, which means "my king is zedek", where Zedek is believed to refer to the word righteous, or perhaps “The Righteous King”. According to one Midrash, Jerusalem was founded by Abraham's forefathers Shem and Eber. And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread 18 יח ּומַ לְכִּ י- קצֶדֶ מֶ לְֶך שָׁ לֵם, הוֹצִּ יא םלֶחֶ וָׁיָׁיִּן; וְ הּוא כֹהֵ ן, לְאֵ ל עֶלְיוֹן. and wine; and he was priest of God the Most High. 5 Middle Bronze Age 2220 -1550 BCE • c.1700 BCE - the Binding of Isaac takes place on Mount Moriah. Mefarashim have often interpreted the location of the mountain to be Jerusalem And they came to the place which God had told him 9 ט וַיָׁבֹאּו, אֶ ל- ַהָׁמֹקוםֲ אֶשרַ ָאמר-לוֹ ָׁהֱאִֹּלהים, וַיִּבֶ ן ָׁשם ַאְבָׁרָׁהם of; and Abraham built the altar there, and laid the אֶ ת- ַהִּמְזֵבַח , וַיַעֲרְֹך אֶ ת- ָׁהֵעִּצים; וַיַעֲקֹד, אֶ ת- ִּיְצָׁחק ְבֹנו , ַוָׁיֶשםֹאֹתו wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on עַל- ַהִּמְזֵבַח , ִּמַמַעל ָׁלֵעִּצים.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did Nebuchadnezzar II Destroy Ashkelon in Kislev 604 ...?
    Offprint From The Fire Signals of Lachish Studies in the Archaeology and History of Israel in the Late Bronze Age, Iron Age, and Persian Period in Honor of David Ussishkin Edited by Israel Finkelstein and Nadav Naʾaman Winona Lake, Indiana Eisenbrauns 2011 © 2011 by Eisenbrauns Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. www.eisenbrauns.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The fire signals of Lachish : studies in the archaeology and history of Israel in the late Bronze age, Iron age, and Persian period in honor of David Ussishkin / edited by Israel Finkelstein and Nadav Naʾaman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-57506-205-1 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Israel—Antiquities. 2. Excavations (Archaeology)—Israel. 3. Bronze age— Israel. 4. Iron age—Israel. 5. Material culture—Palestine. 6. Palestine—Antiquities. 7. Ussishkin, David. I. Finkelstein, Israel. II. Naʾaman, Nadav. DS111.F57 2011 933—dc22 2010050366 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. †Ê Why Did Nebuchadnezzar II Destroy Ashkelon in Kislev 604 ...? Alexander Fantalkin Tel Aviv University Introduction The significance of the discovery of a destruction layer at Ashkelon, identified with the Babylonian assault in Kislev, 604 B.C.E, can hardly be overestimated. 1 Be- yond the obvious value of this find, which provides evidence for the policies of the Babylonian regime in the “Hatti-land,” it supplies a reliable chronological anchor for the typological sequencing and dating of groups of local and imported pottery (Stager 1996a; 1996b; Waldbaum and Magness 1997; Waldbaum 2002a; 2002b).
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Study Program to Israel
    10/8/15 Israel Study Abroad Seminar May 21- June 7, 2016 Proposed Itinerary (Subject to change depending upon conditions at the time) We are very pleased to announce our historical and archaeological study abroad to Israel with a one day optional visit to Petra. This unique study abroad trip will provide each participant with a life time of memorable experiences. For ORU students 3 credits (GBIB 648 Israel Study Abroad), and each student receiving financial aid is required to select an additional 3 credits from the courses offered during the summer 2016 academic schedule. We have designed a special itinerary that will allow you to see what the ordinary tourist to Israel would never have the opportunity to see – all for the special price of $4580 per person. Included in this price are: Daily buffet breakfast and evening dinner at hotels Deluxe coach with English speaking guide and admissions to sites visited 15 nights top tourist star hotel accommodation shared basis in twin/doubles rooms, with late night checkout on 06 June (after dinner) Arrival/departure transfers with porterage at airport and hotels Daily touring with lectures at each site as per your itinerary Entrance fees as listed in your itinerary Border taxes for one day Petra trip from Elat which includes lunch The only things not included are your personal tips for hotels, drivers and guides and any personal items or food for lunch that you may wish to purchase. (Although tips are purely voluntary, it is suggested you consider about $20 per day total.) We sincerely hope you can join us in the Holy Land this coming May 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Eilat Ashkelon Pipeline Company Ltd. Your Energy Gateway
    Eilat Ashkelon Pipeline Company Ltd. Your Energy Gateway Eilat Ashkelon Pipeline Company Ltd. Your Energy Gateway CONTENT Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 The System ............................................................................................................ 6 The Reverse Flow Project .................................................................................. 10 System's Map .................................................................................................... 12 Other Infrastructure Services ............................................................................... 14 EAPC Looks to the Future .................................................................................. 16 Community & Environment ................................................................................ 20 Useful Conversion Factors and Tables .............................................................. 23 INTRODUCTION Founded in 1968, the Eilat Ashkelon Pipeline Co. Ltd. (EAPC) serves as a land bridge for transporting crude oil from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean and vice versa. The crude oil pipeline system consists of 3 separate pipelines: A 42", 254-km long line links the Red Sea Port of Eilat with the Mediterranean Port of Ashkelon. Two other lines feed the Oil Refineries in Haifa and Ashdod. The company operates two oil ports and two oil terminals with a total storage capcity of 3.6 million cubic meters for crude oil and oil
    [Show full text]