DOCSLIB.ORG

Case 1:20-Cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 1 of 274

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case 1:20-Cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 1 of 274 Case 1:20-cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 1 of 274 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN KING, STEPHANIE ANN MILLER, JOSE ALEMAN, STEPHANIE HAGER, SHANNON DENISE COLLINS, ANGELA KAHLER, SCOTT BENNEDSEN, TRACY COMPLAINT UNDER THE BENNEDSEN, JAMIE JOHANNA COATES, ANTI-TERRORISM ACT BRIANNA N. BENSON, FREDERICK C. (18 U.S.C. § 2333) BENSON, BEVERLY MILLS, KATHERINE ABREU-BORDER, JANICE HARRIMAN BRYANT, S.L.B., by and through his next JURY TRIAL DEMANDED friend Janice Harriman Bryant, WILLIAM MICHAEL BURLEY, MICHAEL COLLINS, DAN OLMSTEAD, TAMMY OLMSTEAD, AUGUST CABRERA, CORBIN CABRERA, DANIEL MATIAS CABRERA, GILLIAN No. 1:20-cv-4322 LEIGH CABRERA, M.G.C., by and through his next friend August Cabrera, R.X.C., by and through his next friend August Cabrera, ROBERT CABRERA, RONALD PAUL HOPKINS, SUZANNE RENAE MARTINEZ, JD PROSSER, GLORIA DIANE TRELFA, ARTHUR CAMPBELL, AUDREY CAMPBELL, TINA MARIE CAMPBELL, KARMA CHISHOLM, GLENN CHISHOLM, LINDA REYNOLDS, APRIL CLEARY, JONATHAN CLEARY, DAVID AARON CROW, JUDITH SARA DARROUGH, ROBERT CHARLES DARROUGH, B.C.D., by and through his next friend Kelli Dodge, KELLI DODGE, P.A.D., by and through her next friend Kelli Dodge, VANESSA MARIE ANZURES, BRIAN EDWARD ELLIS, JULIE ANN ELLIS, VICTOR RAYMOND ELLIS, CATHERINE ELM BOATWRIGHT, MARGARET ELM CAMPBELL, DENNIS JOHN ELM, DONNA LEE ELM, MATTHEW ELM, CHRISTINE RANGEL, LOUELLA E. Case 1:20-cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 2 of 274 FRISON, EMMITT DWAYNE BURNS, JANICE CARUSO, PATRICIA GOINS, PAUL EDWARD GOINS III, DANA RAINEY, ANN L. GOULD, JAMES A. GOULD, JULIANNA SYMKOWIAK, CAROL GRIFFIN, DANIEL GRIFFIN, MATT GRIFFIN, SHAWN PATRICK GRIFFIN, SHEILA RISTAINO, CARLOS BENJAMIN GROSS PANIAGUA, FELICIA GROSS PANIAGUA, SOCORRO GROSS PANIAGUA, CARLOS BENJAMIN GROSS RIOS SR., JERRY HARDISON, JUSTINA HARDISON, TERESA HARDISON, TIFFANY DOTSON, ASHLEY MICHELLE HARRIS, FELICIA ANN HARRIS, SORAINYA HARRIS, TENNYSON CHARLES HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER WAYNE JOHNSON, DAVID L. PARKER, MICHAEL RUFUS II, STEPHANIE RUFUS, ALEX HENIGAN, ADAM MATTHEW JAYNE, PAUL ELMER JAYNE, G.A.S., by and through his next friend Kent Alan Skeens, KENT ALAN SKEENS, SHERRY A. SKEENS, T.L.S., by and through his next friend Kent Alan Skeens, Z.R.S., by and through her next friend Kent Alan Skeens, BARCLAY KAMALESON, CADE KAMALESON, CEDRIC PAUL KAMALESON, NICOLE KAMALESON, SUNDERRAJ MARK KAMALESON, ABBY KNAPP-MORRIS, K.K., by and through her next friend Abby Knapp-Morris, BRANDON KORONA, BRIAN LAMBKA, JORDAN LAMBKA, L.A.E.L.B., by and through her next friend Natasha Buchanan, NATASHA BUCHANAN, S.L.L.B., by and through her next friend Natasha Buchanan, DOUGLAS A. LANDPHAIR, JEAN S. LANDPHAIR, MEREDITH LANDPHAIR, C. RICHARD LOONEY, MARTHA LOONEY, MARTIN E. Case 1:20-cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 3 of 274 MADDEN, PAMELA J. MADDEN, MARTIN P. MADDEN, LINDSEY R. MALDONADO, KARYN STONE MARTA, LAWRENCE MARTA, TAYLOR MARTA, BOB SURPRENANT, KRISTIE SURPRENANT, CODY CHEYENNE MAYS, TAMMY RENEE MAYS, THOMAS PIERCE MAYS, ALYSON OVERMAN RODGERS, CHARMAINE RENEE GILBERT, JORDAN GILBERT, M.M., by and through his next friend Sonja McDaniel, SONJA MCDANIEL, JASMINE THOMAS, KATHLEEN MCEVOY, MICHELLE ROSE MCEVOY, PATRICK CHARLES MCEVOY, JANICE H. PROCTOR, LUANN VARNEY, SHANNON K. MCNULTY, MISTY MARIE BARCLAY, ALEXANDER LEE MITTLER, CRISTINE MITTLER, TERRY MITTLER, JOYCE L. TURNER, GABRIEL NEGRON, JOSE NEGRON, MARIBEL NEGRON, MARVIN NEGRON, MARTA TORRES, DERRICK ANTHONY DAVIS, AMANDA NEWMAN, DONALD EDWARD NEWMAN SR., BRANDON NICHOLS, CYNTHIA NICHOLS, DOUGLAS NICHOLS, THOMAS PRIOLO, JESSICA NOVAK CRUZ, SUSAN NOVAK, CHRISTA L. OSBORN, CREIGHTON DAVID OSBORN, KADE M. OSBORN, KATLYN M. OSBORN, MICHELLE HOCK, RANEE MASSONI, JORDAN PLUNK, JUSTIN T. PLUNK, GLENDA WILLARD, BLAINE A. REDDING, DAVID REED, HEATHER L. REED, CASSIE MARIE RICHARDSON, CHRISTOPHER POWERS, H.R., by and through her next friend Randy Ristau, RANDY RISTAU, SUZANNE RISTAU, CARLOS CRUZ, JOEL C. CRUZ, E.N.R., by and through his next friend Jannett Cecilia Roberts, MIGUEL ANGEL NATHANIEL ROBERTS, Case 1:20-cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 4 of 274 JANNETT CECILIA ROBERTS, R.G., by and through her next friend Leslie Rodriguez, LESLIE RODRIGUEZ, ANGEL R. ROLDAN, LIESELOTTE R. ROLDAN, MATTHIAS P. ROLDAN, SAMANTHA G. ROLDAN, COLLEEN WHIPPLE, BRANDON TYLER SCHMIDT, LEEANN SCHMIDT, PHILLIP J. SCHMIDT, G.S., by and through his next friend Georganne M. Siercks, G.S., by and through his next friend Georganne M. Siercks, GEORGANNE M. SIERCKS, JOAN M. SMEDINGHOFF, MARK T. SMEDINGHOFF, MARY BETH SMEDINGHOFF, REGINA C. SMEDINGHOFF, THOMAS SMEDINGHOFF, ADRIAN CARRILLO SOLTERO, GUSTAVO ALFONSO SOLTERO SR., MARIA SOLTERO, JAN MARIE HURNBLAD SPARKS, ERIK SPARKS, GARRY LEE SPARKS, JANE SPARKS, ZACHARY DOUGLAS SPARKS, LISA MARTINUSEN, MARIE SENTINA MIELKE, ANNETTE SPEHAR, JACOB LOUIS SPEHAR, LUKE SPEHAR, PATRICK SPEHAR, MITCHELL L. STAMBAUGH, GARRETT LAYNE FUNK, ERIN NICOLE GOSS, TRECIA BROCK HOOD, WENDY SHEDD, FREDDIE DEWEY SUTTON, HARRIET SUTTON, SUMMER BREANNE SUTTON, EVELYN TAYLOR, DIANE TIMONEY, GREGORY TIMONEY, RYAN GREGORY TIMONEY, BARRY WELCH, LORRIA WELCH, ZACKARY WELCH, BRIAN GREGORY CLYBURN, DAVID WHIPPLE, KIMBERLEY A. WHIPPLE, SEAN WHIPPLE, MICHELLE CAROLINA ROTELLI, MARTHA CAROLINA SMITH, individually, and for the estate of JAMES T. WICKLIFF-CHACIN, THOMAS ELMER WICKLIFF, ABRILL RENEE WILLIAMS- Case 1:20-cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 5 of 274 OSBOURNE, CLARENCE WILLIAMS JR., TALISA SHERVON WILLIAMS, SAMANTHA SHERVON WILLIAMS, MICHELLE ZIMMERMAN, BAILY ZIMMERMAN, CHRIS LEE ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiffs, v. HABIB BANK LIMITED, Defendant. Ryan R. Sparacino Tejinder Singh (pro hac vice forthcoming) (SDNY Bar No. TS0613) SPARACINO PLLC GOLDSTEIN & RUSSELL, P.C. 1920 L Street, NW, Suite 535 7475 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 850 Washington, DC 20036 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: 202.629.3530 Tel: 202.362.0636 [email protected] Fax: 866.574.2033 [email protected] Case 1:20-cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 6 of 274 TABLE OF CONTENTS NATURE OF THE ACTION ....................................................................................1 THE PARTIES ...........................................................................................................7 JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................................7 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ....................................................................................8 I. The al-Qaeda Terror Syndicate .................................................................. 9 A. Al-Qaeda..............................................................................................10 B. Taliban and the Haqqani Network ......................................................12 C. Lashkar-e-Taiba ...................................................................................30 D. Jaish-e-Mohammed .............................................................................42 E. The Kabul Attack Network .................................................................50 II. Habib Bank Limited (HBL) Knowingly Provided Material and Substantial Support to Terrorists and Terrorist Organizations ................53 A. HBL Knowingly Provided Material Support to Members of the al-Qaeda Terror Syndicate and Their Agents ......................................53 B. HBL Acted With the Requisite Scienter for Primary and Secondary Liability .............................................................................80 C. HBL’s Assistance to the al-Qaeda Terror Syndicate Was Substantial, and Caused Terrorist Attacks ........................................102 D. HBL’s Assistance to the al-Qaeda Terror Syndicate Had a Substantial Nexus to the United States .............................................107 III. Al-Qaeda Committed, Planned And Authorized The Terrorist Attacks That Injured Plaintiffs ...............................................................117 A. Al-Qaeda Led the Syndicate .............................................................118 B. Al-Qaeda Authorized and Planned Taliban Terrorist Attacks ..........125 C. Al-Qaeda Directly Participated in Taliban Terrorist Attacks ...........145 IV. The Plaintiffs ..........................................................................................152 CLAIMS FOR RELIEF .........................................................................................261 PRAYER FOR RELIEF ........................................................................................267 i Case 1:20-cv-04322 Document 1 Filed 06/05/20 Page 7 of 274 Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, allege the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action under the Anti-Terrorism Act (“ATA”) as amended by the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (“JASTA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2333(a) and (d), brought on behalf of Americans injured and the families of Americans killed in a series of terrorist attacks in Afghanistan from mid-2010 through early 2019. The attacks were perpetrated by members of a syndicate of terrorist organizations led by al-Qaeda—referred to in this Complaint as the “al-Qaeda Terror Syndicate” or the “Syndicate.” 2. The attacks were planned, authorized, and committed by al-Qaeda, typically in conjunction with one or more other members of the Syndicate. These members include al-Qaeda, which was designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization (“FTO”) by the U.S. government in 1999; Lashkar-e-Taiba (“LeT” or “LT”), a Pakistani terrorist organization designated an FTO in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISI in Pakistan's Domestic Politics
    ISI in Pakistan’s Domestic Politics: An Assessment Jyoti M. Pathania D WA LAN RFA OR RE F S E T Abstract R U T D The articleN showcases a larger-than-life image of Pakistan’s IntelligenceIE agencies Ehighlighting their role in the domestic politics of Pakistan,S C by understanding the Inter-Service Agencies (ISI), objectives and machinations as well as their domestic political role play. This is primarily carried out by subverting the political system through various means, with the larger aim of ensuring an unchallenged Army rule. In the present times, meddling, muddling and messing in, the domestic affairs of the Pakistani Government falls in their charter of duties, under the rubric of maintenance of national security. Its extra constitutional and extraordinary powers have undoubtedlyCLAWS made it the potent symbol of the ‘Deep State’. V IC ON TO ISI RY H V Introduction THROUG The incessant role of the Pakistan’s intelligence agencies, especially the Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI), in domestic politics is a well-known fact and it continues to increase day by day with regime after regime. An in- depth understanding of the subject entails studying the objectives and machinations, and their role play in the domestic politics. Dr. Jyoti M. Pathania is Senior Fellow at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi. She is also the Chairman of CLAWS Outreach Programme. 154 CLAWS Journal l Winter 2020 ISI IN PAKISTAN’S DOMESTIC POLITICS ISI is the main branch of the Intelligence agencies, charged with coordinating intelligence among the
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Al-Qaida and the Pakistani Harakat Movement: Reflections and Questions About the Pre-2001 Period by Don Rassler
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 11, Issue 6 Articles Al-Qaida and the Pakistani Harakat Movement: Reflections and Questions about the pre-2001 Period by Don Rassler Abstract There has been a modest amount of progress made over the last two decades in piecing together the developments that led to creation of al-Qaida and how the group has evolved over the last 30 years. Yet, there are still many dimensions of al-Qaida that remain understudied, and likely as a result, poorly understood. One major gap are the dynamics and relationships that have underpinned al-Qaida’s multi-decade presence in Pakistan. The lack of developed and foundational work done on the al-Qaida-Pakistan linkage is quite surprising given how long al- Qaida has been active in the country, the mix of geographic areas - from Pakistan’s tribal areas to its main cities - in which it has operated and found shelter, and the key roles Pakistani al-Qaida operatives have played in the group over the last two decades. To push the ball forward and advance understanding of this critical issue, this article examines what is known, and has been suggested, about al-Qaida’s relations with a cluster of Deobandi militant groups consisting of Harakat ul-Mujahidin, Harakat ul-Jihad Islami, Harakat ul-Ansar, and Jaish-e-Muhammad, which have been collectively described as Pakistan’s Harakat movement, prior to 9/11. It finds that each of these groups and their leaders provided key elements of support to al-Qaida in a number of direct and indirect ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Policy Towards Pakistan, 1969-1979
    CHINESE POLICY TOWARDS PAKISTAN (1969 - 1979) by Samina Yasmeen Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania April 1985 CONTENTS INTHODUCTION 1 PART ONE CHAPTER I 7 CHINESE POLICY TOWARDS PAKISTAN DURING THE 1950s 7 CHAPTER II 31 CHINESE POLICY TOWARDS PAKISTAN DURING THE 1960-68 PERIOD 31 Keeping the Options Open 31 Cautious Move to Friendship 35 Consolidation of a Friendship 38 The Indo-Pakistan War (1965) and China 63 The Post-War Years 70 Conclusion 72 PART TWO CHAPTER III 74 FROM UNQUALIFIED TO QUALIFIED SUP PORT: THE KASJ-IMIIl DISPUTE 75 China and the Kashmir Issue: 1969-1971 76 The Bhutto Regime - The Kashmir Issue and China 85 The Zia Regime - The Kashmir Issue and China 101 CHAPTER IV FROM QUALIFIED TO UNQUALIFIED SUPPORT: EAST PAKISTAN CRISIS (1971) 105 The Crisis - India, Pakistan and China's Initial Reaction 109 Continuation of a Qualified Support 118 A Change in Support: Qualified to Unqualified 129 Conclusion 138 CHAPTER V 140 UNQUALIFIED SUPPORT: CHINA AND THE 'NEW' PAKISTAN'S PROBLEMS DECEMBER 1971-APRIL 1974 140 Pakistan's Problems 141 Chinese Support for Pakistan 149 Significance of Chinese Support 167 Conclusion 17 4 CHAPTER VI 175 CAUTION AMIDST CONTINUITY: CHINA, THE INDIAN NUCLEAR TEST AND A PROPOSED NUCLEAR FREE SOUTH ASIA 175 Indian Nuclear Explosion 176 Nuclear-Free Zone in South Asia 190 Conclusion 199 CHAPTER VII 201 PAKISTAN AND THE SAUR REVOLUTION IN AFGHANISTAN (1978): CHINESE RESPONSES 201 The Saur Revolution and Pakistan's Threat Perceptions
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Organized Crimes
    International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies :ISSN:2348-8212:Volume 3 Issue 4 154 TRENDS IN ORGANIZED CRIMES Manik Sethi and Smeeksha Pandey1 Abstract There is wide support for the argument and assertion that organized crime has increased in the last decade. But the problem for any discussion on organized crime is establishing the extent to which it exists and the size of the threat to democracy and security that it could represent. The myth, mystery and secrecy that surrounds organized crime and the clandestine nature with which it operates makes it hard to quantify and reach sound conclusions on. One of the most important factors is the establishing of a proper and sound working definition of organized crime in order to move away from the mythical notions that pervade the popular conscious and perhaps many security and intelligence institutions within India. Organized crime, it would seem, is extremely complex involving many different groups and people who operate in a variety of different ways and styles. Some it is equally important to establish the differences as well as the common features of organized crime. It is not possible to respond effectively to organized crime until it is fully understood. The goal of any organized criminal activity is to make huge profits that need to be laundered before the capital can be used to expand their illegal business empires. Rendering banking transparent at a business level would go some way to eradicating money laundering, ultimately impeding and inhibiting the expansion of organized crime, and arguably represents one of the key measures in its control.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmerprotestsflare Upagain,Manyinjured Inharyanacrackdown
    eye THE SUNDAY EXPRESS MAGAZINE In the Light of Ye sterday KOLKATA,LATECITY Once there wasaKabul that AUGUST29,2021 wasacityofdreamersand 18PAGES,`5.00 poets, kite flyersand (EX-KOLKATA`7,`12INNORTHEASTSTATES&ANDAMAN) children trudging to school DAILY FROM: AHMEDABAD, CHANDIGARH, DELHI, JAIPUR, KOLKATA, LUCKNOW, MUMBAI, NAGPUR, PUNE, VADODARA WWW.INDIANEXPRESS.COM PAGES 13, 14, 15 ED summons BKU ISSUES CALL TO FARMERS TO GATHER to Abhishek, wife; Mamata Farmerprotestsflare says agencies upagain,manyinjured ‘let loose’ inHaryanacrackdown Lathicharge on protestagainsta Abhishek,Rujiraare facing a BJP meetchaired moneylaundering case by CM; Khattar says if violence, EXPRESSNEWSSERVICE NEWDELHI,KOLKATA, ‘police have to act’ AUGUST28 THE ENFORCEMENT Directorate EXPRESSNEWSSERVICE (ED) has summonedsenior Afghans queue up forone of Italy’s lastmilitaryaircraftout of Kabul, Friday. Italysaid it had evacuated 4,890 people in all. Reuters CHANDIGARH,AUGUST28 Trinamool Congress leader and Chief MinisterMamata THE AGITATION againstfarm Police break up the protestatBastara toll plaza, Karnal. Express Banerjee’s nephewAbhishek laws enacted lastyear returned Banerjee and his wifeRujirafor First outreach signal: UNSC drops to the spotlight Saturdaywhen questioning in connection with a Haryana Police crackeddownon case of moneylaundering asso- farmers in Karnal, leaving sev- If someone breaches ciated with alleged pilferageof eral injured in alathicharge at coal from Eastern Coalfield Taliban reference in line on terror the Bastara toll plaza on the na- cordon, make sure has a Limited mines. tional highway. Abhishek,anMPfrom The farmers were protesting Diamond Harbour,has been India chair,itmentionedTaliban on Aug16; onlytalksofAfghan groups Aug27 againstaBJP meeting on the broken head: IAS officer asked to appear before the forthcoming panchayatpolls — Investigating Officer on ity as the chair forthis month.
    [Show full text]
  • D-Company and the 1993 Mumbai Bombings: Rethinking a Case of ‘Crime-Terror Convergence’ in South Asia
    Mahadevan – D-company & 1993 Mumbai Bombings 54 The European Review of Organised Crime Original article D-Company and the 1993 Mumbai Bombings: rethinking a case of ‘crime-terror convergence’ in South Asia Prem Mahadevan* Abstract: In 1993, a transnational crime organization known as D-Company carried out mass-casualty terrorist bombings in Mumbai, India. The reasons for this action have been attributed to religious grievances. However, little attention has been given to the role played by Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence in supporting the bombings. Taking into account what has emerged in the public domain over the last 28 years regarding ISI links with D-Company and with international jihadist groups more generally, a re-assessment of the 1993 bombings is required. Hitherto regarded as an example of ‘crime-terror convergence’, it appears that D-Company might be more aptly considered an instrument of covert action. Keywords: Terrorism, heroin, gold, intelligence, covert operations. * Prem Mahadevan is Senior Analyst, Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. Email: [email protected] The European Review of Organised Crime 6(1), 2021, pp. 54-98. ISSN: 2312-1653 © ECPR Standing Group of Organised Crime. For permissions please email: [email protected] 54 Mahadevan – D-company & 1993 Mumbai Bombings 55 Introduction This article examines why the transnational crime syndicate known as ‘D-Company’ bombed the city of Mumbai in 1993. In what remains the bloodiest-ever terror incident on Indian soil, 257 civilians were killed by 12 near-synchronous explosions. The bombs had been assembled using military-grade explosive smuggled from abroad. The events of that day, Friday 12 March 1993, are considered by scholars as an example of hybridity between organized crime and political terrorism (Rollins, Wyler and Rosen, 2010: 14-16).
    [Show full text]
  • Post 9/11 Trends: Bush to Obama to Trump (Multilateralism and Peace Initiatives in Afghanistan)
    Citation: Khokhar, W., Jamil, T., & Hussain, Q. A. (2021). Post 9/11 Trends: Bush to Obama to Trump (Multilateralism and Peace Initiatives in Afghanistan). Global Political Review, VI(I), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-I).04 Waseem Khokhar * | Tahir Jamil † | Qamar Abid Hussain ‡ Post 9/11 Trends: Bush to Obama to Trump (Multilateralism and Peace Initiatives in Afghanistan) Vol. VI, No. I (Winter 2021) URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-I).04 Pages: 37 – 49 p- ISSN: 2521-2982 e- ISSN: 2707-4587 p- ISSN: 2521-2982 DOI: 10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-I).04 Headings Abstract The overall U.S. strategy in Afghanistan lacks clarity and consistently coordinated efforts/policies to bring peace in the • Theme of Study war-torn country. From the Bush to Obama and Trump administrations, • Introduction the situation remains complex, and ambiguity prevails on the future of • Multilateral Approach Afghanistan and achievements; therefore, the U.S. needs to think outside • Obama: Afpak and Counter- the box to emerge from this turbulent 19 years-long war. No single country can bring peace and security in Afghanistan due to its complex and diverse Terrorism Strategy nature of issues, its history of conflicts and unsettled domestic issues, which • Obama’s Afghanistan Strategy divided the nation into different tribes and factions. The continuity in using • Withdrawal of U.S. Forces soft and smart powers, a multilateral approach, along with Principal-Agent • Peace in Intra-Afghan Dialogue theory, would help to further pave the way forward for bringing peace in • Helping Central Govt Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Semitism: a Pillar of Islamic Extremist Ideology
    Anti-Semitism: A Pillar of Islamic Extremist Ideology In a video message in August 2015, Osama bin Laden’s son, Hamza bin Laden, utilized a range of anti-Semitic and anti-Israel narratives in his effort to rally Al Qaeda supporters and incite violence against Americans and Jews. Bin Laden described Jews and Israel as having a disproportionate role in world events and the oppression of Muslims. He compared the “Zio- Crusader alliance led by America” to a bird: “Its head is America, one wing is NATO and the other is the State of the Jews in occupied Palestine, and the legs are the tyrant rulers that sit on the chests of the peoples of the Muslim Ummah [global community].” An undated image of al-Qaeda terrorist Osama bin Laden and his son, Hamza Bin Laden then called for attacks worldwide and demanded that Muslims “support their brothers in Palestine by fighting the Jews and the Americans... not in America and occupied Palestine and Afghanistan alone, but all over the world…. take it to all the American, Jewish, and Western interests in the world.” Such violent expressions of anti-Semitism have been at the core of Al Qaeda’s ideology for decades. Even the 9/11 terrorist attacks were motivated, in part, by anti-Semitism. Mohamed Atta, a key member of the Al Qaeda Hamburg cell responsible for the attacks, reportedly considered New York City to be the center of a global Jewish conspiracy, and Khalid Sheik Mohammed, who masterminded the attack, had allegedly previously developed several plans to attack Israeli and Jewish targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Global War on Terrorism and Prosecution of Terror Suspects: Select Cases and Implications for International Law, Politics, and Security
    GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM AND PROSECUTION OF TERROR SUSPECTS: SELECT CASES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW, POLITICS, AND SECURITY Srini Sitaraman Introduction The global war on terrorism has opened up new frontiers of transnational legal challenge for international criminal law and counterterrorism strategies. How do we convict terrorists who transcend multiple national boundaries for committing and plotting mass atrocities; what are the hurdles in extraditing terrorism suspects; what are the consequences of holding detainees in black sites or secret prisons; what interrogation techniques are legal and appropriate when questioning terror suspects? This article seeks to examine some of these questions by focusing on the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), particularly in the context of counterterrorism strategies that the United States have pursued towards Afghanistan-Pakistan (Af-Pak) since the September 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington D.C. The focus of this article is on the methods employed to confront terror suspects and terror facilitators and not on the politics of cooperation between the United States and Pakistan on the Global War on Terrorism or on the larger military operation being conducted in Afghanistan and in the border regions of Pakistan. This article is not positioned to offer definitive answers or comprehensive analyses of all pertinent issues associated with counterterrorism strategies and its effectiveness, which would be beyond the scope of this effort. The objective is to raise questions about the policies that the United States have adopted in conducting the war on terrorism and study its implications for international law and security. It is to examine whether the overzealousness in the execution of this war on terror has generated some unintended consequences for international law and complicated the global judicial architecture in ways that are not conducive to the democratic propagation of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Taliban, Terrorism and War on Terror: Assessing US Involvement in Afghanistan Introduction 1.1
    Article Kardan Journal of Social Taliban, Terrorism and War on Sciences and Humanities Terror: Assessing US 3 (2) 47–67 Involvement in Afghanistan ©2020 Kardan University Kardan Publications Kabul, Afghanistan https://kardan.edu.af/Research/ Sidiqullah Sahel CurrentIssue.aspx?j=KJSSH Abstract It has been 19 years of September 11 tragedy, in response United States waged a war against perpetrators. The country with some NATO member countries took the lead in war against terror, and started Operation enduring freedom on 7th October 2001, to topple the Taliban regime, and Eliminate terrorist organizations from its roots. For the purpose to be achieved, USA convened a conference in Bonn Germany, comprising All Jihadist groups, except Taliban and Hezbe Islami Hekmatyar, for formation of new administration and sharing power. Hamid Karzai was appointed as head of new interim administration in the conference on 5th December 2001, and gradually ISAF under NATO deployed around the country to suppress Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces. After 20 years of war in Afghanistan, USA could defeat neither international terrorism, nor Taliban militarily, but instead it exacerbated the security conditions of the country, and led to creation of a greater number of terrorist organizations. USA finally decided to withdraw all its forces from Afghanistan through an agreement signed between USA and Taliban on 29th February 2020. now the Question arises whether US has achieved what they wanted to? whether the country succeeded in state- building in Afghanistan? The paper finds out, that absence of unanimity and perfect policy regarding Taliban amongst Afghan statesmen and US is one of momentous reasons for prolonging Afghan war, and After crumbling the regime of Taliban, USA did not have any specific policy for state-building or rehabilitation in Afghanistan, instead their intention at that time was that of retaliation and counter-terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • AWAN Tres ABBAS
    M426 - ABBAS TEXT M/UP 18/5/06 11:40 AM Page 207 Gary Gary's G4:Users:Gary:Public:Gary's Jo CHAPTER 15 Transitional Religiosity Experiences: Contextual Disjuncture and Islamic Political Radicalism Akil N. Awan On 7 July 2005, four young indigenous British Muslims, three of Pakistani provenance and the fourth a Jamaican convert to Islam, became Britain’s first domestic suicide bombers. A fortnight later, eliciting an unsettling sense of déjà-vu, a second abortive wave of attacks on the London transport network followed, the culprits this time being British asylum seekers hailing from the troubled horn of Africa. These ‘martyrdom operations’ (as they are alluded to in the idiom of Islamist- Jihadist discourse), until now, only experienced vicariously through theatres of conflict such as Iraq and Israel, shocked us all, leaving many of us reeling at the prospect of this new threat posed by a small (but as of yet unknown) propor- tion of Britain’s 1.6 million-strong Muslim community. The events of July 2005 were exceptional only in the sense that this was the first time British Muslims had perpetrated terrorist acts of this magnitude on home soil; however, they were not entirely without precedent. British Muslims have been drawn to radical Islamism in the past and have included, inter alia, Richard Reid, the ‘shoe bomber’ of December 2001; the five members of the ‘Tipton Taliban’ captured by coalition forces in Afghanistan in January 2002; Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, responsible for conveying US journalist Daniel Pearl to his death in Pakistan in February 2002; the group of Britons granted asylum from North African who were responsible for a failed chemical attack on the London Underground in November 2002; Asif Mohammed Hanif and Omar Khan Sharif, who con- ducted suicide bomb attacks in Tel Aviv in May 2003; and eight British Pakistanis from Luton, who were found to be in possession of a large quantity of explosive material in March 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadist Violence: the Indian Threat
    JIHADIST VIOLENCE: THE INDIAN THREAT By Stephen Tankel Jihadist Violence: The Indian Threat 1 Available from : Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org/program/asia-program ISBN: 978-1-938027-34-5 THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS, established by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mission is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and interna- tional affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan insti- tution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publications and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. The Center is the publisher of The Wilson Quarterly and home of Woodrow Wilson Center Press, dialogue radio and television. For more information about the Center’s activities and publications, please visit us on the web at www.wilsoncenter.org. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Thomas R. Nides, Chairman of the Board Sander R. Gerber, Vice Chairman Jane Harman, Director, President and CEO Public members: James H.
    [Show full text]