DOCSLIB.ORG

Starpower: the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Starpower: the U.S Starpower: The U.S. and the International Quest for Fusion Energy October 1987 NTIS order #PB88-128731 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Starpower: The U.S. and the Internna- tional Quest for Fusion Energy, OTA-E-338 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, October 1987). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 87-619854 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form can be found in the back of this report) . Foreword Fusion research, offering the hope of an energy technology with an essentially un- limited supply of fuel and relatively attractive environmental impacts, has been con- ducted worldwide for over three decades. In the United States, increased budgetary pressures, along with a decreased sense of urgency, have sharpened the competition for funding between one research program and another and between energy research programs and other components of the Federal budget. This report, requested by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and endorsed by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, reviews the status of magnetic confine- ment fusion research and compares its progress with the requirements for develop- ment of a usefuI energy technology. The report does not analyze inertial confinement fusion research, which is overseen by the House and Senate Armed Services Committees. OTA analyzed the magnetic fusion research program in three ways: (1) as an energy program, by identifying important features of the technology and discussing its possi- ble role in the energy supply mix; (2) as a research program, by discussing its role in training scientists and developing new fields of science and technology; and (3) as an international program, by reviewing its history of international cooperation and its prospects for even more extensive collaboration in the future. OTA could not have conducted this work without the valuable assistance it re- ceived from many organizations and individuals. I n particular, we would like to thank the advisory panel members, workshop participants, and outside reviewers, who pro- vided guidance and extensive critical reviews to ensure the accuracy of the report. Responsibility for the final report, however, rests solely with the Office of Technology Assessment. Magnetic Fusion Research Advisory Panel William Carey, Panel Chair Executive Officer, American Association for the Advancement of Science Ellen Berman Betty Jensen Executive Director Nuclear and Environmental Program Manager Consumer Energy Council of America Research and Development Public Service Electric & Gas Co. Linda Cohen Assistant Visiting Professor of Economics Hans Landsberg University of Washington Senior Fellow Emeritus Resources for the Future Paul Craig professor of Physics Lawrence Lidsky Department of Applied Science Professor of Nuclear Engineering University of California, Davis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Harold Forsen Irving Mintzer Manger of Research and Development Senior Associate Bechtel National, Inc. World Resources Institute T. Kenneth Fowler Robert park Associate Director Executive Director Magnetic Fusion Energy Office of Public Affairs Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory American Physical Society Melvin Gottlieb Murray Rosenthal Director Emeritus Associate Laboratory Director for Advanced Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Energy Systems Oak Ridge National Laboratory L. Charles Hebel Manager, Research Planning Eugene Skolnikoff Corporate Research Technical Staff Director Xerox Corp. Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Robert Hirsch Vice President Herbert Woodson Arco Oil & Gas Co. Director Center for Energy Studies Leonard Hyman University of Texas, Austin Vice President Merrill Lynch Capital Markets NOTE: OTA appreciates and is grateful for the valuable assistance and thoughtful critiques provided by the advisory panel members. The panel does not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse this report. OTA assumes full responsibility for the report and the accuracy of its contents. iv OTA Project Staff on Magnetic Fusion Research Lionel S. Johns, Assistant Director, OTA Energy, Materials, and International Security Division Peter D. Blair, Energy and Materials Program Manager Gerald L. Epstein, Project Director Dina K. Washburn Contractors Wilfrid Kohl Leonard Lynn Paul Josephson Lynn Powers Fusion Power Associates Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories Administrative Staff Lillian Chapman Linda Long Barbara J. Carter Workshop Participants and Other Outside Reviewers Workshop 1: Fusion Research Chuan Sheng Liu Judy Bostock Chairman Operations Research Analyst Panelists Department of Physics and U.S. Office of Management and Robert Seamans, Workshop Chair Astronomy Budget Senior Lecturer University of Maryland, College Melvin Gottlieb Aeronautics and Astronautics Park Director Emeritus Department Thomas Ratchford Princeton Plasma Physics Massachusetts Institute of Associate Executive Officer Laboratory Technology American Association for the Paul Huray Sibley Burnett Advancement of Science Senior Policy Analyst General Manager John Sheffield General Science Applied Superconetics Division Associate Director for U.S. Office of Science and GA Technologies Confinement Technology Policy Ronald Davidson Fusion Energy Division Paul Josephson Director Oak Ridge National Laboratory Program in Science, Technology Plasma Fusion Center Herbert Woodson and Society Massachusetts Institute of Director Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Energy Studies Technology Stephen Dean University of Texas, Austin Wilfrid Kohl President Director Fusion Power Associates Contributor International Energy Program Harold Forsen N. Anne Davies Johns Hopkins School of Manager of Research and Assistant Director Advanced International Studies Development Office of Fusion Energy Linda Lubrano Bechtel National, Inc. U.S. Department of Energy Professor T. Kenneth Fowler School of International Service Workshop II: International Associate Director The American University Cooperation Magnetic Fusion Energy Leonard Lynn Lawrence Livermore National Eugene Skolnikoff, Workshop Assistant Professor Laboratory Chair Department of Social and Director Harold Furth Decision Sciences Center for International Studies Carnegie-Mellon University Director Massachusetts Institute of Princeton Plasma Physics Technology Charles Newstead Laboratory Foreign Affairs Officer Harold Benglesdorf Melvin Gottlieb Bureau of Oceans and Vice President International Environmental and Director Emeritus International Group Princeton Plasma Physics Scientific Affairs International Energy Associates Laboratory U.S. Department of State Limited Robert Hirsch Douglas R. Norton Diana Bieliauskas Chief of International Planning Vice President Program Officer Arco Oil & Gas Co. and Program Office Office of Soviet and East European U.S. National Aeronautics and Robert Krakowski Affairs Space Administration Group Leader National Academy of Sciences Systems Study Group Herman Pollack Justin Bloom Los Alamos National Laboratory Research Professor President Department of International Affairs Lawrence Lidsky Technology International, Inc. George Washington University Professor of Nuclear Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology vi Michael Roberts Harold Feiveson Richard Barnes Director Center for Energy and U.S. National Aeronautics and International Programs Environmental Studies Space Administration Office of Fusion Energy Princeton University Lee Berry U.S. Department of Energy Bill Keepin Oak Ridge National Laboratory Richard Samuels School of Engineering and Applied Joan Lisa Bromberg Professor of Political Science Science Laser History Project Massachusetts Institute of Princeton University Technology Daniel Chavardes Carlo La Porta Embassy of France U. John Sakss Director of Research Chief of International Program Solar Energy Industries Association Daniel Cohn Support Office René MaIès Massachusetts Institute of U.S. National Aeronautics and Technology Senior Vice President and Space Administration Principal Donald L. Cook Decision Focus, Inc. Sandia National Laboratories Workshop Ill: Energy Context Michael Mauel Tony Cox Robert Fri, Workshop Chair Assistant Professor Embassy of the United Kingdom President Department of Applied Physics Resources for the Future and Nuclear Engineering John Deutch Truman Anderson Columbia University Massachusetts Institute of Technology Director Irving Mintzer Program Planning and Analysis Senior Associate Thomas J. Fessenden Oak Ridge National Laboratory World Resources Institute Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Charles Backus Eric Reichl Thomas G. Finn Assistant Dean Retired, Conoco Coal Corp. U.S. Department of Energy College of Engineering and Applied Science Arthur Rosenfeld William Hogan Arizona State University Director Lawrence Livermore National Center for Building Science Laboratory Charles Berg Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Professor and Head of Department John Holdren Department of Mechanical John Siegel University of California, Berkeley Engineering Vice President Paul Koloc Northeastern University Atomic Industrial Forum Phaser Corp. Jan Beyea Don Steiner Dennis Mahlum Vice President of Science Institute Professor Battelle Pacific Northwest National Audubon Society Department of Nuclear Laboratories Engineering and Engineering Paul Craig Physics George Miley Professor of Physics Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute University
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iter: Os Caminhos Da Energia De Fusão E O Brasil (2015)
    ITER Os caminhos da energia de fusão e o Brasil MINISTÉRIO DAS RELAÇÕES EXTERIORES Ministro de Estado Embaixador Mauro Luiz Iecker Vieira Secretário -Geral Embaixador Sérgio França Danese FUNDAÇÃO ALEXANDRE DE GUSMÃO Presidente Embaixador Sérgio Eduardo Moreira Lima Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais Diretor Embaixador José Humberto de Brito Cruz Centro de História e Documentação Diplomática Diretor Embaixador Maurício E. Cortes Costa Conselho Editorial da Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão Presidente Embaixador Sérgio Eduardo Moreira Lima Membros Embaixador Ronaldo Mota Sardenberg Embaixador Jorio Dauster Magalhães e Silva Embaixador Gonçalo de Barros Carvalho e Mello Mourão Embaixador José Humberto de Brito Cruz Embaixador Julio Glinternick Bitelli Ministro Luís Felipe Silvério Fortuna Professor Francisco Fernando Monteoliva Doratioto Professor José Flávio Sombra Saraiva Professor Eiiti Sato A Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, instituída em 1971, é uma fundação pública vinculada ao Ministério das Relações Exteriores e tem a finalidade de levar à sociedade civil informações sobre a realidade internacional e sobre aspectos da pauta diplomática brasileira. Sua missão é promover a sensibilização da opinião pública nacional para os temas de relações internacionais e para a política externa brasileira. Augusto Pestana ITER Os caminhos da energia de fusão e o Brasil Brasília, 2015 Direitos de publicação reservados à Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão Ministério das Relações Exteriores Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco H Anexo II, Térreo 70170 ‑900 Brasília–DF Telefones:(61) 2030 ‑6033/6034 Fax:(61) 2030 ‑9125 Site: www.funag.gov.br E ‑mail: [email protected] Equipe Técnica: Eliane Miranda Paiva Fernanda Antunes Siqueira Gabriela Del Rio de Rezende Luiz Antônio Gusmão André Luiz Ventura Ferreira Projeto Gráfico e Capa: Yanderson Rodrigues Programação Visual e Diagramação: Gráfica e Editora Ideal Impresso no Brasil 2015 P476 Pestana, Augusto.
    [Show full text]
  • LANL Fusion Capabilities
    LANL Fusion Capabilities INFUSE workshop Jan 22-23, 2019 1 Managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Los Alamos has a long history of fusion research James Tuck, Ivy Mike, 1952 Perhapsatron, 1953 • Today magnetic and inertial fusion work resides in the Physics Division, Theory Division, and X Division (Weapons). There are also related capabilities in detectors, radiation damage, and tritium handling. • Dr. John Kline ( [email protected] ) is the present Fusion Energy Sciences (and Inertial Fusion) program manager, and a point-of-contact. 2 Managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA 3 Managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA FRC’s were developed in Russia and Los Alamos FRC’s are high beta plasmas, with many interesting features 4 Managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Today FRC plasmas are still being explored 5 Managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA Magnetized Plasma Team in P-24 Plasma Physics We do experimental plasma work for FES, APRA-E, and NNSA sponsors, with national and international partners, including small businesses. We use our knowledge of plasma diagnostics, pulsed power expertise, and HED plasmas in the areas of fusion energy, weapons support, and basic plasma science. Team Leader: Glen Wurden ([email protected]) Staff: Hsu, Weber, Langendorf, Dunn, Shimada Postdocs: Tom Byvank, Kevin Yates, John Boguski Student: Chris Roper (Summer) 6 Managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE and INNOVATION at Los Alamos
    SCIENCE AND INNOVATION at Los Alamos Los Alamos Science Number 21 1993 1993 Number 21 Los Alamos Science 1 . Fred Reines (left) helps lower Wright Langham into a detector similar to the one used by Reines to detect neutrinos for the first time. The active medium of the detector was a liquid scintillator developed by F. Newton Hayes for assays of large biological sam- ples. The availability of liquid scintillators led to the whole-body counter, a device for monitoring the amount of certain radionu- clides in the bodies of workers exposed to radioactive materials. Wright Langham was one of the world’s experts on the metabo- lism of plutonium. Lattice-gas hydrodynamics, a discrete model for fluid flow, was invented by Brosl Hasslacher at Los Alamos with U. Frisch and Y. Pomeau. This novel formulation provides a fast, efficient, reliable method for simulating the Navier-Stokes equations and two-phase flow. A modification by Ken Eggert and coworkers is now being applied to model flow through porous media, a problem of great interest to oil companies. Norman Doggett and Judy Tesmer examine a gel at the Laboratory’s Center for Human Genome Studies. The Human Genome Project, a joint DOE-NIH effort, was largely conceived at a DOE meeting in Santa Fe in 1986. Researchers at the Los Alamos Center developed a widely used technique for fingerprinting DNA, discovered the human telomere (the se- quence at the ends of every human chromosome), are developing physical maps of several human chromosomes, and are preparing chromosome-specific libraries of clones, which are extremely useful in physical-mapping projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Characteristics of the Stabilized Toroidal Pinch Machine, Perhapsatron S-4
    P/2488 USA Operational Characteristics of the Stabilized Toroidal Pinch Machine, Perhapsatron S-4 By J. P. Conner, D. C. H age r m an, J. L. Honsaker, H. J. Karr, J. P. Mize, J. E. Osher, J. A. Phillips and E. J. Stovall Jr. Several investigators1"6 have reported initial success largely inductance-limited and not resistance-limited in stabilizing a pinched discharge through the utiliza- as observed in PS-3. After gas breakdown about 80% tion of an axial Bz magnetic field and conducting of the condenser voltage appears around the secondary, walls, and theoretical work,7"11 with simplifying in agreement with the ratio of source and load induct- assumptions, predicts stabilization under these con- ances. The rate of increase of gas current is at first ditions. At Los Alamos this approach has been large, ~1.3xlOn amp/sec, until the gas current examined in linear (Columbus) and toroidal (Per- contracts to cause an increase in inductance, at which hapsatron) geometries. time the gas current is a good approximation to a sine Perhapsatron S-3 (PS-3), described elsewhere,4 was curve. The gas current maximum is found to rise found to be resistance-limited in that the discharge linearly with primary voltage (Fig. 3), deviating as current did not increase significantly for primary expected at the higher voltages because of saturation vçltages over 12 kv (120 volts/cm). The minor inside of the iron core. diameter of this machine was small, 5.3 cm, and the At the discharge current maximum, the secondary onset of impurity light from wall material in the voltage is not zero, and if one assumes that there is discharge occurred early in the gas current cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • RTM Perspectives June 27, 2016
    Fusion Finally Coming of Age? Manny Frishberg, Contributing Editor RTM Perspectives June 27, 2016 Harnessing nuclear fusion, the force that powers the sun, has been a pipe dream since the first hydrogen bombs were exploded. Fusion promises unlimited clean energy, but the reality has hovered just out of reach, 20 years away, scientists have said for more than six decades—until now. Researchers at Lawrence Livermore Labs, the University of Washington, and private companies like Lockheed Martin and Canada’s General Fusion now foresee the advent of viable, economical fusion energy in as little as 10 years. Powered by new developments in materials, control systems, and other technologies, new reactor designs are testing old theories and finding new ways to create stable, sustainable reactions. Nuclear power plants create energy by breaking apart uranium and plutonium atoms; by contrast, fusion plants squeeze together atoms (typically hydrogen) at temperatures of 1 to 2 million degrees C to form new, heavier elements, essentially creating a miniature star in a bottle. Achieving fusion requires confining plasma to create astronomical levels of pressure and heat. Two approaches to confining the plasma have dominated: magnetic and inertial confinement. Magnetic confinement uses the electrical conductivity of the plasma to contain it with magnetic fields. Inertial confinement fires an array of powerful lasers or particle beams at the hydrogen atoms to pressurize and superheat them. Both approaches require huge amounts of energy, and they struggle to get more energy back out of the system. Most efforts to date have relied on some form of magnetic confinement. For instance, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, or ITER, being built in southern France by a coalition that includes the European Union, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the United States, is a tokamak reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Categories and Scope Descriptions Co Q
    International Nuclear Information System (INIS) • LU Q CD XA0202260 D) c CO IAEA-ETDE/TNIS-2 o X LU CO -I—• SUBJECT CATEGORIES AND SCOPE DESCRIPTIONS CO Q ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series No. 2 CT O c > LU O O E "- =3 CO I? O cB CD C , LU • CD 3 CO -Q T3 CD >- c •a « C c CD o o CD «2 i- CO .3-3/33 CO ,_ CD a) O % 3 O •z. a. Renewable energy technologies • Radiation protection • Energy storage, conversion, and consumption Radioactive waste management • Energy policy • Radiation effects on living organisms • Fossil fuels INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, JULY 2002 ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series No. 2 SUBJECT CATEGORIES AND SCOPE DESCRIPTIONS INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, JULY 2002 SUBJECT CATEGORIES AND SCOPE DESCRIPTIONS IAEA, VIENNA, 2002 IAEA-ETDE/INIS-2 ISBN 92-0-112902-5 ISSN 1684-095X © IAEA, 2002 Printed by the IAEA in Austria July 2002 PREFACE This document is one in a series of publications known as the ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series. It defines the subject categories and provides the scope descriptions to be used for categorization of the nuclear literature for the preparation of INIS input by national and regional centers. Together with volumes of the INIS Reference Series and ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series it defines the rules, standards and practices and provides the authorities to be used in the International Nuclear Information System. A list of the volumes published in the IMS Reference Series and ETDE/ENIS Joint Reference Series can be found at the end of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • LA-7973-MS the Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor (RFPR) Concept O
    LA-7973-MS Informal Report The Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor (RFPR) Concept 01 O LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY Post Office Box 1663 Los Alamos. New Mexico 87545 LA-7973-MS Informal Report UC-20d MOT Issued: August 1979 The Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor (RFPR) Concept R. L. Hagenson R. A. Krakowski G. E. Cort MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS Engineering: W. E. Fox, R. W. Teasdale Neutronics: P. D. Soran Tritium: C. G. Bathke, H. Cullingford Materials: F. W. Clinard, Jr. Plasma Engineering: R. L. Miller Physics: D. A. Baker, J. N. DiMarco Electrotechnology: R. W. Moses l-neip. :«. makes s any legal inW,i» „. ,«p..nS*.lil> >"' <'« 11|lll.CSi Ulit l'ISCl • '' ! 1. Equilibrium and Stability 15b 2. Transport 155 3-. Startup . 158 4. Rundown (Quench) 159 B. T'jchnolofey Assessment 160 1. First wall 160 2. Blanket 160 3» Energy Transfer, Storage and Switching 161 4. Magnets 162 5« Vacuum and Tritium Recovery 162 C. Summary Assessment 163 APPENDIX A. RFPR BURN MODEL AND REACTOR'CODE 166 1. Plasma and Magnetic Field Models 166 2. Plasma Energy balance 169 3. Anomalous Radial Transport 17A APPENDIX B. COSTING MODEL 176 APPENDIX C. STANDARD FUSIOt: REACTOR DESIGN TABLE 185 APPENDIX D. BLANKET TRITIUM TRANSPORT MODEL 197 1. Development of Model 197 2. Evaluation of Model 200 3. Tritium Inventory Question - 202 APPENDIX E. SUMMARY REVIEW OF DESIGN POINT EVOLUTION 206 vn TABLE OF CONTENTS THL REVERSED-FIELI) PINCH REACTOR (KFPR) CONCEPT 1 ABSTRACT 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 A. Fundamental Physics Issues 4 B. Reactor Description ••* 9 1. Reactor Operation 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Titan Reversed-Field-Pinch Fusion Reactor Study
    4X* I ^© tf> UCLA-PPG-1200 THE TITAN REVERSED-RELD-PINCH FUSION REACTOR STUDY gFVysw^Bijyp. Final Report 1990 Volume III: TITAN-I Fusion Power Core University of California, Los Angeles Los Alamos National Laboratory Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, Los Alamos, NM and Nuclear Engineering and Institute of Plasma and Fusion Research. Los Angeles, CA Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute General Atomics Department of Nuclear Engineering San Diego, CA Troy, NY ClSTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agen­ cy thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or useful­ ness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately r-wned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommen­ dation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, the views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the united State Government or any agency thereof. UCLA/PPG—1200-Vol .3 DE92 000139 THE TITAN REVERSED-FIELD-PINCH FUSION REACTOR STUDY FINAL REPORT 1090 Volume III: TITAN-I Fusion Power Core University of California, Los Angeles Los Alamos National Laboratory Department of MeehanicaJ, Aerospace, Los Alamos, NM and Nuclear Engineering and Institute of Plasma and Fusion Research Los Angeles, CA Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute General Atomics Department of Nuclear Engineering San Diego, Ca Troy, NY MASTER ^ DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES Farrokh Najmabadi, Robert W.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the HIT-SI Research Program and Its Implications for Magnetic Fusion Energy
    An overview of the HIT-SI research program and its implications for magnetic fusion energy Derek Sutherland, Tom Jarboe, and The HIT-SI Research Group University of Washington 36th Annual Fusion Power Associates Meeting – Strategies to Fusion Power December 16-17, 2015, Washington, D.C. Motivation • Spheromaks configurations are attractive for fusion power applications. • Previous spheromak experiments relied on coaxial helicity injection, which precluded good confinement during sustainment. • Fully inductive, non-axisymmetric helicity injection may allow us to overcome the limitations of past spheromak experiments. • Promising experimental results and an attractive reactor vision motivate continued exploration of this possible path to fusion power. Outline • Coaxial helicity injection NSTX and SSPX • Overview of the HIT-SI experiment • Motivating experimental results • Leading theoretical explanation • Reactor vision and comparisons • Conclusions and next steps Coaxial helicity injection (CHI) has been used successfully on NSTX to aid in non-inductive startup Figures: Raman, R., et al., Nucl. Fusion 53 (2013) 073017 • Reducing the need for inductive flux swing in an ST is important due to central solenoid flux-swing limitations. • Biasing the lower divertor plates with ambient magnetic field from coil sets in NSTX allows for the injection of magnetic helicity. • A ST plasma configuration is formed via CHI that is then augmented with other current drive methods to reach desired operating point, reducing or eliminating the need for a central solenoid. • Demonstrated on HIT-II at the University of Washington and successfully scaled to NSTX. Though CHI is useful on startup in NSTX, Cowling’s theorem removes the possibility of a steady-state, axisymmetric dynamo of interest for reactor applications • Cowling* argued that it is impossible to have a steady-state axisymmetric MHD dynamo (sustain current on magnetic axis against resistive dissipation).
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Scale Fusion Tackles Energy, Space Applications
    NEWS FEATURE NEWS FEATURE Small-scalefusiontacklesenergy,spaceapplications Efforts are underway to exploit a strategy that could generate fusion with relative ease. M. Mitchell Waldrop, Science Writer On July 14, 2015, nine years and five billion kilometers Cohen explains, referring to the ionized plasma inside after liftoff, NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft passed the tube that’s emitting the flashes. So there are no the dwarf planet Pluto and its outsized moon Charon actual fusion reactions taking place; that’s not in his at almost 14 kilometers per second—roughly 20 times research plan until the mid-2020s, when he hopes to faster than a rifle bullet. be working with a more advanced prototype at least The images and data that New Horizons pains- three times larger than this one. takingly radioed back to Earth in the weeks that If that hope pans out and his future machine does followed revealed a pair of worlds that were far more indeed produce more greenhouse gas–free fusion en- varied and geologically active than anyone had ergy than it consumes, Cohen and his team will have thought possible. The revelations were breathtak- beaten the standard timetable for fusion by about a ing—and yet tinged with melancholy, because New decade—using a reactor that’s just a tiny fraction of Horizons was almost certain to be both the first and the size and cost of the huge, donut-shaped “tokamak” the last spacecraft to visit this fascinating world in devices that have long devoured most of the research our lifetimes. funding in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Electric Applications of Fusion
    Non-Electric Applications of Fusion Final Report to FESAC, July 31, 2003 Executive Summary This report examines the possibility of non-electric applications of fusion. In particular, FESAC was asked to consider “whether the Fusion Energy Sciences program should broaden its scope and activities to include non-electric applications of intermediate-term fusion devices.” During this process, FESAC was asked to consider the following questions: • What are the most promising opportunities for using intermediate-term fusion devices to contribute to the Department of Energy missions beyond the production of electricity? • What steps should the program take to incorporate these opportunities into plans for fusion research? • Are there any possible negative impacts to pursuing these opportunities and are there ways to mitigate these possible impacts? The panel adopted the following three criteria to evaluate all of the non-electric applications considered: 1. Will the application be viewed as necessary to solve a "national problem" or will the application be viewed as a solution by the funding entity? 2. What are the technical requirements on fusion imposed by this application with respect to the present state of fusion and the technical requirements imposed by electricity production? What R&D is required to meet these requirements and is it "on the path" to electricity production? 3. What is the competition for this application, and what is the likelihood that fusion can beat it? It is the opinion of this panel that the most promising opportunities for non-electric applications of fusion fall into four categories: 1. Near-Term Applications 2. Transmutation 3. Hydrogen Production 4.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2005
    September 2005 National Nuclear Security Administration’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Also in this issue: • The World’s Most Famous Equation • Analytic Solutions Help Verify Codes • Explaining a Mysterious Astronomical Feature About the Cover For several decades, Laboratory researchers have been examining both magnetic and inertial confi nement methods for generating fusion energy. As the article beginning on p. 4 describes, the magnetized plasmas of Livermoreʼs Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX) represent one possible route to a source of abundant, inexpensive, and environmentally benign energy. Shown on the cover is a high-speed photograph of a spheromak plasma forming inside SSPX. Cover design: Amy Henke Amy design: Cover About the Review Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated by the University of California for the Department of Energyʼs National Nuclear Security Administration. At Livermore, we focus science and technology on ensuring our nationʼs security. We also apply that expertise to solve other important national problems in energy, bioscience, and the environment. Science & Technology Review is published 10 times a year to communicate, to a broad audience, the Laboratoryʼs scientifi c and technological accomplishments in fulfi lling its primary missions. The publicationʼs goal is to help readers understand these accomplishments and appreciate their value to the individual citizen, the nation, and the world. Please address any correspondence (including name and address changes) to S&TR, Mail Stop L-664, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, or telephone (925) 423-3432. Our e-mail address is [email protected]. S&TR is available on the World Wide Web at www.llnl.gov/str.
    [Show full text]