DOCSLIB.ORG

Subject Categories and Scope Descriptions Co Q

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

International Nuclear Information System (INIS) • LU Q CD XA0202260 D) c CO IAEA-ETDE/TNIS-2 o X LU CO -I—• SUBJECT CATEGORIES AND SCOPE DESCRIPTIONS CO Q ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series No. 2 CT O c > LU O O E "- =3 CO I? O cB CD C , LU • CD 3 CO -Q T3 CD >- c •a « C c CD o o CD «2 i- CO .3-3/33 CO ,_ CD a) O % 3 O •z. a. Renewable energy technologies • Radiation protection • Energy storage, conversion, and consumption Radioactive waste management • Energy policy • Radiation effects on living organisms • Fossil fuels INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, JULY 2002 ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series No. 2 SUBJECT CATEGORIES AND SCOPE DESCRIPTIONS INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, JULY 2002 SUBJECT CATEGORIES AND SCOPE DESCRIPTIONS IAEA, VIENNA, 2002 IAEA-ETDE/INIS-2 ISBN 92-0-112902-5 ISSN 1684-095X © IAEA, 2002 Printed by the IAEA in Austria July 2002 PREFACE This document is one in a series of publications known as the ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series. It defines the subject categories and provides the scope descriptions to be used for categorization of the nuclear literature for the preparation of INIS input by national and regional centers. Together with volumes of the INIS Reference Series and ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series it defines the rules, standards and practices and provides the authorities to be used in the International Nuclear Information System. A list of the volumes published in the IMS Reference Series and ETDE/ENIS Joint Reference Series can be found at the end of this publication. At the 27th Consultative Meeting of IMS Liaison Officers (Vienna, Austria, 25-27 May 1999), it was recommended to adopt a simplified subject category scheme, common to the IMS and ETDE databases, which was prepared by a joint INIS/ETDE working group. The corresponding scope descriptions prepared by the same working group were endorsed by the 5th DSflS/ETDE Joint Technical Committee meeting, Knoxville, TN, USA, 28-29 October 1999. This simplified categorization scheme contains 45 one-level broad subject categories from which 42 only are within IMS subject scope. These categories have three-character alphanumeric codes. The scope descriptions are given for both IMS and ETDE on opposite pages. Special note should be made of the fact that the overall subject scope of IMS has not been affected by the adoption of the simplified categorization scheme. The secretariat wishes to acknowledge the assistance, comments and suggestions received from national IMS centers in the preparation of the new revision of the present document and continues to invite comments and criticism, which should be sent to: IMS Section, IAEA or ETDE Operating Agent P.O. Box 100 P.O. Box 1000 A-1400 Vienna Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Austria USA PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK Contents Preface 3 Introduction 7 Category Descriptions 9 Appendix 1. Guide for elements of nuclear interest 66 Appendix 2. The international nuclear event scale 67 Appendix 3. Correlation between the previous INIS categories and the new categories 69 Appendix 4. Correlation between the new categories and the previous INIS categories 76 Appendix 5. Correlation between the old ETDE categories and the new common categories 78 Index 79 INTRODUCTION This ETDE/INIS Joint Reference Series document is intended to serve two purposes: • to define the subject scope of the International Nuclear Information System (INIS) and the Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) • to define the subject classification scheme of INIS and ETDE. It is thus the guide to inputting centers in determining which items of literature should be reported, and in determining where the full bibliographic entry and abstract of each item should be included in the INIS or ETDE databases. Each category is identified by a category code consisting of three alphanumeric characters. A scope description is given for each subject category. The scope of INIS is the sum of the scopes of all the categories. It should be noted that three categories from the common scheme, namely S32 (ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION), S33 (ADVANCED PRO- PULSION SYSTEMS), and S47 (OTHER INSTRUMENTATION) are not within IMS subject scope. With most categories cross references are provided to other categories where appropriate. Cross references should be of assistance in finding the appropriate category; in fact, by indicating topics that are excluded from the category in question, the cross references help to clarify and define the scope of the category to which they are appended. A Subject Index is included as an aid to subject classifiers, but it is only an aid and not a means for subject classification. It facilitates the use of this document, but is no substitute for the description of the scope of the subject categories. Index-based subject categorization is likely to be wrong and must be avoided. Subject classifiers, who are expected to be subject specialists at INIS inputting centers, are requested to identify the significant topics of each item of literature and to report the item only if it contains significant information that falls within the subject scope of INIS. The main topic (from the "nuclear science" point of view for INIS) is the basis for determining the primary subject category. The INIS: Guide to Bibliographic Description (IAEA-INIS-1) requires the assignment of a primary subject category to each INIS record (in Tag 008). The primary category should be the one for which the scope description encompasses the main INIS topic discussed in the piece of literature. If there are significant secondary topics discussed in the piece of literature that fall within the scope description of a category or categories other than the one relevant to the main topics of the paper, INIS rules permit the assignment of one or more secondary categories for the piece of literature. Furthermore, in order to create subsets of the database containing references to literature that might be useful in a particular area, it has been found advantageous in certain cases to additionally assign a secondary category to indicate the field of application or area of usefulness of the information contained in the piece of literature. This is also permitted under INIS rules. Although their number is not limited, more than one or two secondary categories rarely should be needed. Category Descriptions Codes 501 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT 502 PETROLEUM 503 NATURAL GAS 504 OIL SHALES AND TAR SANDS 507 ISOTOPES AND RADIATION SOURCES 508 HYDROGEN 509 BIOMASS FUELS 510 SYNTHETIC FUELS SI 1 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS 512 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON- RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES 513 HYDRO ENERGY 514 SOLAR ENERGY 515 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY 516 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER 517 WIND ENERGY 520 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS 521 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS 522 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS 524 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 525 ENERGY STORAGE 529 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY 530 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION 532 ENERGY CONSERVA TION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION (ETDE only) 533 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS (ETDE only) 536 MATERIALS SCIENCE 537 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY S3 8 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY 542 ENGINEERING 543 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS 546 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 547 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION (ETDE only) S54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES S58 GEOSCIENCES 560 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES 561 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY 562 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 563 RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS 570 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY 571 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS 572 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS 573 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS 574 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS 575 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SUPERFLUIDITY 598 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION 599 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS INIS Scope Descriptions SOI COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT Environmental aspects of developing, transporting and using coal, coal products, lignite and peat for energy production, including studies on animal life, plant life, cultural resources of the affected area, land, air, surface water and groundwater pollution, site revegetation and overall effects Economic aspects, such as supply and demand, consumption, trade and restraints to trade, prices, market trends, forecasts, R & D expenditures, labor factors, taxes and tax credits, impacts of policy and energy costs on households, regions, countries, impact of weather on supply and demand, economics of power plants fueled by coal, lignite, peat and gas from coal gasification, economic aspects of accidents S02 PETROLEUM Environmental aspects of the various steps in drilling, production, refining, transporting and using petroleum and petroleum products for energy production, including oil spills and studies on animal life, plant life, cultural resources of the affected area, land, air, surface water and groundwater pollution, site revegetation and overall effects Economic aspects, such as supply and demand, consumption, trade and restraints to trade, prices, market trends, forecasts, R & D expenditures, labor factors, taxes and tax credits, impacts of policy and energy costs on households, regions, countries, impact of weather on supply and demand, economics of power plants fueled by petroleum, economic aspects
Recommended publications
  • Richard G. Hewlett and Jack M. Holl. Atoms

    Richard G. Hewlett and Jack M. Holl. Atoms

    ATOMS PEACE WAR Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission Richard G. Hewlett and lack M. Roll With a Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall and an Essay on Sources by Roger M. Anders University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London Published 1989 by the University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England Prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission; work made for hire. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hewlett, Richard G. Atoms for peace and war, 1953-1961. (California studies in the history of science) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Nuclear energy—United States—History. 2. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission—History. 3. Eisenhower, Dwight D. (Dwight David), 1890-1969. 4. United States—Politics and government-1953-1961. I. Holl, Jack M. II. Title. III. Series. QC792. 7. H48 1989 333.79'24'0973 88-29578 ISBN 0-520-06018-0 (alk. paper) Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii List of Figures and Tables ix Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall xi Preface xix Acknowledgements xxvii 1. A Secret Mission 1 2. The Eisenhower Imprint 17 3. The President and the Bomb 34 4. The Oppenheimer Case 73 5. The Political Arena 113 6. Nuclear Weapons: A New Reality 144 7. Nuclear Power for the Marketplace 183 8. Atoms for Peace: Building American Policy 209 9. Pursuit of the Peaceful Atom 238 10. The Seeds of Anxiety 271 11. Safeguards, EURATOM, and the International Agency 305 12.
  • Arxiv:2010.09509V2 [Hep-Ph] 2 Apr 2021 in Searches for CLFV Or LNV, Incoming Muons Are the Source of Both the Μ → E Signal and the RMC Back- Ground

    Arxiv:2010.09509V2 [Hep-Ph] 2 Apr 2021 in Searches for CLFV Or LNV, Incoming Muons Are the Source of Both the Μ → E Signal and the RMC Back- Ground

    FERMILAB-PUB-20-525-T The high energy spectrum of internal positrons from radiative muon capture on nuclei Ryan Plestid1, 2, ∗ and Richard J. Hill1, 2, y 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA 2Theoretical Physics Department, Fermilab, Batavia, IL 60510,USA (Dated: April 5, 2021) The Mu2e and COMET collaborations will search for nucleus-catalyzed muon conversion to positrons (µ− ! e+) as a signal of lepton number violation. A key background for this search is radiative muon capture where either: 1) a real photon converts to an e+e− pair “externally" in surrounding material; or 2) a virtual photon mediates the production of an e+e− pair “internally”. If the e+ has an energy approaching the signal region then it can serve as an irreducible background. In this work we describe how the near end-point internal positron spectrum can be related to the real photon spectrum from the same nucleus, which encodes all non-trivial nuclear physics. I. INTRODUCTION Specifically, on a nucleus (e.g. aluminum), the reaction µ− + [A; Z] ! e+ + [A; Z − 2] ; (1) Charged lepton flavor violation (CLFV) is a smok- ing gun signature of physics beyond the Standard Model becomes a viable target for observation (see also [7]). (SM) and is one of the most sought-after signals at the While neutrinoless double beta (0νββ) decay is often intensity frontier [1–4]. Important search channels in- touted as the most promising direction for the discovery volving the lightest two lepton generations are µ ! 3e, of LNV, there do exist extensions of the SM that predict µ ! eγ, and nucleus-catalyzed µ ! e [1–6].
  • The United Kingdom's Defence Nuclear Weapons Programme

    The United Kingdom's Defence Nuclear Weapons Programme

    Publications and Reports The United Kingdom's Defence Nuclear Weapons Programme A Summary Report by The Ministry of Defence on the Role of Historical Accounting for Fissile Material in the Nuclear Disarmament Process, and on Plutonium for the United Kingdom's Defence Nuclear Programme Introduction 1. The Government is committed to transparency and openness about the defence nuclear programme when compatible with continuing national security requirements and the United Kingdom’s international obligations under Article I of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The Government is also committed to work towards the goal of the global elimination of nuclear weapons As the Strategic Defence Review stated, eliminating nuclear weapons will require States which have had nuclear programmes outside international safeguards to account for the fissile material that they have produced. This contributes to the process of nuclear disarmament by developing confidence that as States reduce and eventually eliminate their nuclear weapons, they have not retained concealed stocks of fissile material outside international supervision with which to construct clandestine nuclear weapons. Such accounting was crucial to the International Atomic Energy Agency’s initial verification of the comprehensive safeguards agreement signed by South Africa when it eliminated its nuclear weapons programme and joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as a non-nuclear-weapon State. The United States has produced a comprehensive report on its production of plutonium for defence purposes, and is working on a similar study on its production of High Enriched Uranium. 2. It is important not to overestimate the contribution such historical accounting can make to the verification of the reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons.
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea

    Democratic People's Republic of Korea

    ; Democratic People's Republic ofKorea PERMANENT MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS 820 Second Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, N.V: 1001.7 Tel: (212) 972-3105/3106 Fax: (212) 972-3154 Press Release Please Check against Delivery STATEMENT BY H.E. Mr. PAKKIL YON VICE MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA AT THE HIGH-LEVEL MEETING ON NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT OF THE 68th UN GENERALASSEMBLY NEW YORK, 26 SEPTEMBER 2013 Mr. President, First ofall, on behalf ofthe delegation ofthe Democratic People's Republic ofKorea (DPRK), I would like to congratulate you for your assumption of the important duty as the president of this session. Furthermore, I am confident that under your able leadership, this meeting will be a significant occasion in the United Nation's endeavors for nuclear disarmament. Mr. President, Prevention of nuclear arms race and realization of the world free from nuclear weapons through nuclear disarmament is becoming a pressing task in ensuring peace and security of the world. 45 years ago, nuclear powers made a commitment to nuclear disarmament through the Treaty on Nuclear Non-Proliferation (NPT) and ~hey put obligations on non-nuclear weapon states to use atomic power for peaceful purposes only. These commitments for nuclear disarmament were reconfirmed in 1995 when the NPT was extended for indefinite period without any amendments and through "Thirteen Action Plan for Nuclear Disarmament" which was taken at the NPT Review Conference in 2000. However, notwithstanding this, there is a tendency in which. priority is being given to non-proliferation, rather than nuclear disarmament. Under .the pretext of nuclear disarmament, development of new types of nuclear weapons of enhanced capability are constantly pushed ahead and furthermore maneuvers to conduct.
  • Resource Guide on Nuclear Disarmament for Religious Leaders

    Resource Guide on Nuclear Disarmament for Religious Leaders

    RESOURCE GUIDE ON nuclear disarmament FOR RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND COMMUNITIES RESOURCE GUIDE ON nuclear disarmament FOR RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND COMMUNITIES Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds. — J. Robert Oppenheimer, Director of the Manhattan Project, which created the first atom bomb, quoting the Bhagavad Gita as he witnessed the atom bomb test at Alamogordo, New Mexico, on July 16, 1945 When scientific power outruns spiritual power, we end up with guided missiles and misguided men. — Martin Luther King, Jr. Inside cover: Baker Test, Marshall Islands, July 25, 1946. Photo: U.S. Department of Defense. CATASTROPHIC IMPACT OF NUCLEAR TESTS ON HUMAN HEALTH Now we have this problem of what we call “jelly-fish babies.” These babies are born like jelly-fish. They have no eyes. They have no heads. They have no arms. They have no legs. They do not shape like human beings at all. When they die they are buried right away. A lot of times they don’t allow the mother to see this kind of baby because she will go crazy. It is too inhumane. — Darlene Keju-Johnson, Director of Family Planning 1987–1992, Marshall Islands, on the impact of U.S. nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Religions for Peace (RfP) would like to express its gratitude and appreciation to the Norwegian Min- istry of Foreign Affairs and Rissho Kosei-Kai for their years of generous support and partnership in RfP’s education and advocacy program to mobilize religious leaders and their constituencies around a credible, cohesive and bold advocacy and action agenda for peace and shared security, particularly in the area of nuclear disarmament.
  • 4 Muon Capture on the Deuteron 7 4.1 Theoretical Framework

    4 Muon Capture on the Deuteron 7 4.1 Theoretical Framework

    February 8, 2008 Muon Capture on the Deuteron The MuSun Experiment MuSun Collaboration model-independent connection via EFT http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/exp/musun V.A. Andreeva, R.M. Careye, V.A. Ganzhaa, A. Gardestigh, T. Gorringed, F.E. Grayg, D.W. Hertzogb, M. Hildebrandtc, P. Kammelb, B. Kiburgb, S. Knaackb, P.A. Kravtsova, A.G. Krivshicha, K. Kuboderah, B. Laussc, M. Levchenkoa, K.R. Lynche, E.M. Maeva, O.E. Maeva, F. Mulhauserb, F. Myhrerh, C. Petitjeanc, G.E. Petrova, R. Prieelsf , G.N. Schapkina, G.G. Semenchuka, M.A. Sorokaa, V. Tishchenkod, A.A. Vasilyeva, A.A. Vorobyova, M.E. Vznuzdaeva, P. Winterb aPetersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina 188350, Russia bUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA cPaul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland dUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA eBoston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA f Universit´eCatholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium gRegis University, Denver, CO 80221, USA hUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA Co-spokespersons underlined. 1 Abstract: We propose to measure the rate Λd for muon capture on the deuteron to better than 1.5% precision. This process is the simplest weak interaction process on a nucleus that can both be calculated and measured to a high degree of precision. The measurement will provide a benchmark result, far more precise than any current experimental information on weak interaction processes in the two-nucleon system. Moreover, it can impact our understanding of fundamental reactions of astrophysical interest, like solar pp fusion and the ν + d reactions observed by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.
  • Status of the Alcap Experiment

    Status of the Alcap Experiment

    Status of the AlCap experiment R. Phillip Litchfield∗† UCL E-mail: [email protected] The AlCap experiment is a joint project between the COMET and Mu2e collaborations. Both experiments intend to look for the lepton-flavour violating conversion m + A ! e + A, using ter- tiary muons from high-power pulsed proton beams. In these experiments the products of ordinary muon capture in the muon stopping target are an important concern, both in terms of hit rates in tracking detectors and radiation damage to equipment. The goal of the AlCap experiment is to provide precision measurements of the products of nuclear capture on Aluminium, which is the favoured target material for both COMET and Mu2e. The results will be used for optimising the design of both conversion experiments, and as input to their simulations. Data was taken in December 2013 and is currently being analysed. 16th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Future Neutrino Beam Facilities - NUFACT2014, arXiv:1501.04880v1 [physics.ins-det] 20 Jan 2015 25 -30 August, 2014 University of Glasgow, United Kingdom ∗Speaker. †On behalf of the AlCap Collaboration © Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Status of the AlCap experiment R. Phillip Litchfield 1. Muon to electron conversion and the motivation for AlCap The term ‘muon to electron conversion’ refers to processes that cause the neutrinoless decay of a muon into an electron, specifically those in which the muon is the ground-state orbit of an atomic nucleus.1 In this case the conservation of momentum and energy can be achieved by coherent interaction on the nucleus, i.e.
  • OSP11: Nuclear Weapons Policy 1967-1998

    OSP11: Nuclear Weapons Policy 1967-1998

    OPERATIONAL SELECTION POLICY OSP11 NUCLEAR WEAPONS POLICY 1967-1998 Revised November 2005 1 Authority 1.1 The National Archives' Acquisition Policy announced the Archive's intention of developing Operational Selection Policies across government. These would apply the collection themes described in the overall policy to the records of individual departments and agencies. 1.2 Operational Selection Policies are intended to be working tools for those involved in the selection of public records. This policy may therefore be reviewed and revised in the light of comments from users of the records or from archive professionals, the experience of departments in using the policy, or as a result of newly discovered information. There is no formal cycle of review, but comments would be welcomed at any time. The extent of any review or revision exercise will be determined according to the nature of the comments received. If you have any comments upon this policy, please e-mail records- [email protected] or write to: Acquisition and Disposition Policy Manager Records Management Department The National Archives Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 4DU 1.3 Operational Selection Policies do not provide guidance on access to selected records. 2 Scope 2.1 This policy relates to all public records on British nuclear weapons policy and development. The departments and agencies concerned are the Prime Minister’s Office, the Cabinet Office, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Security Policy Department, Defence Department, Atomic Energy and Disarmament Department, and Arms Control and Disarmament Department), HM Treasury (Defence and Material Department), the Department of Trade and Industry (Atomic Energy, and Export Control and Non-Proliferation Directorate), the Ministry of Defence (MOD), the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) and the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA).
  • Pursuing Disarmament

    Pursuing Disarmament

    PURSUING DISARMAMENT hortly after the September 11 clear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) program has now been terrorist attacks on Amer- cancelled, the administration is pursuing a plan, labeled ica, Under-Secretary- the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW), which will General for the United Na- see the development of a range of new nuclear bombs tions (UN) Disarmament Affairs to replace all weapons currently in the arsenal. It is Jayantha Dhanapala highlighted likely that, over the long run, nuclear testing will be nec- the link between preventing nu- essary for the RRW program. 6 clear terrorism and nuclear disar- mament: “we need to eliminate weapons of mass de- The United States’ proposed option to use nuclear 1 struction before they fall into the hands of terrorists.” weapons against non-nuclear weapon states and for purposes other than retaliation Thus, while the U.S. works with the international com- blurs the distinction between nu- munity to secure more quickly all nuclear weapons clear and conventional warfare. and bomb-making material worldwide, we must also The U.S. government cannot con- realize that a comprehensive approach to prevention tinue to tell other nations, like includes reducing and eliminating nuclear weapons North Korea and Iran, that nuclear and materials from global stockpiles. Indeed, even proliferation is wrong while it pur- before 9/11, signors of the Nuclear Nonproliferation of sues new and more “usable” nu- Treaty (NPT), including the United States, agreed that clear weapons here at home. As a “the total elimination of nuclear weapons is the only Salt Lake City Tribune editorial put absolute guarantee against the use or threat of use of it, “If the United States, which nuclear weapons.” 2 This sentiment is well supported commands the most powerful con- Polaris C4 Ballistic Missile being launched from the by the American public.
  • LA-7973-MS the Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor (RFPR) Concept O

    LA-7973-MS the Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor (RFPR) Concept O

    LA-7973-MS Informal Report The Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor (RFPR) Concept 01 O LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY Post Office Box 1663 Los Alamos. New Mexico 87545 LA-7973-MS Informal Report UC-20d MOT Issued: August 1979 The Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor (RFPR) Concept R. L. Hagenson R. A. Krakowski G. E. Cort MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS Engineering: W. E. Fox, R. W. Teasdale Neutronics: P. D. Soran Tritium: C. G. Bathke, H. Cullingford Materials: F. W. Clinard, Jr. Plasma Engineering: R. L. Miller Physics: D. A. Baker, J. N. DiMarco Electrotechnology: R. W. Moses l-neip. :«. makes s any legal inW,i» „. ,«p..nS*.lil> >"' <'« 11|lll.CSi Ulit l'ISCl • '' ! 1. Equilibrium and Stability 15b 2. Transport 155 3-. Startup . 158 4. Rundown (Quench) 159 B. T'jchnolofey Assessment 160 1. First wall 160 2. Blanket 160 3» Energy Transfer, Storage and Switching 161 4. Magnets 162 5« Vacuum and Tritium Recovery 162 C. Summary Assessment 163 APPENDIX A. RFPR BURN MODEL AND REACTOR'CODE 166 1. Plasma and Magnetic Field Models 166 2. Plasma Energy balance 169 3. Anomalous Radial Transport 17A APPENDIX B. COSTING MODEL 176 APPENDIX C. STANDARD FUSIOt: REACTOR DESIGN TABLE 185 APPENDIX D. BLANKET TRITIUM TRANSPORT MODEL 197 1. Development of Model 197 2. Evaluation of Model 200 3. Tritium Inventory Question - 202 APPENDIX E. SUMMARY REVIEW OF DESIGN POINT EVOLUTION 206 vn TABLE OF CONTENTS THL REVERSED-FIELI) PINCH REACTOR (KFPR) CONCEPT 1 ABSTRACT 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 A. Fundamental Physics Issues 4 B. Reactor Description ••* 9 1. Reactor Operation 10 2.
  • The Titan Reversed-Field-Pinch Fusion Reactor Study

    The Titan Reversed-Field-Pinch Fusion Reactor Study

    4X* I ^© tf> UCLA-PPG-1200 THE TITAN REVERSED-RELD-PINCH FUSION REACTOR STUDY gFVysw^Bijyp. Final Report 1990 Volume III: TITAN-I Fusion Power Core University of California, Los Angeles Los Alamos National Laboratory Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, Los Alamos, NM and Nuclear Engineering and Institute of Plasma and Fusion Research. Los Angeles, CA Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute General Atomics Department of Nuclear Engineering San Diego, CA Troy, NY ClSTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agen­ cy thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or useful­ ness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately r-wned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommen­ dation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, the views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the united State Government or any agency thereof. UCLA/PPG—1200-Vol .3 DE92 000139 THE TITAN REVERSED-FIELD-PINCH FUSION REACTOR STUDY FINAL REPORT 1090 Volume III: TITAN-I Fusion Power Core University of California, Los Angeles Los Alamos National Laboratory Department of MeehanicaJ, Aerospace, Los Alamos, NM and Nuclear Engineering and Institute of Plasma and Fusion Research Los Angeles, CA Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute General Atomics Department of Nuclear Engineering San Diego, Ca Troy, NY MASTER ^ DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES Farrokh Najmabadi, Robert W.
  • Radiative Muon Capture on Carbon, Oxygen and Calcium

    Radiative Muon Capture on Carbon, Oxygen and Calcium

    TRI-PP -90-21 May 1990 Radiative muon capture on carbon, oxygen and calcium D.S. Armstrong/") S. Ahmad/6) R.A. Burnham/C) T.P. Gorringe.W M.D. Hasinoff, A.J. Larabee<e>, and C.E. Waltham University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 2A6 G. AzuelosO, J.A. Macdonald, T. Numao and J-M. Poutissou TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., Canada VST 2A3 M. Blecher and D.H. Wright'^ Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 E.T.H. Clifford^) and J. Summhammer*1' TRIUMF and University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8W 2Y2 P. Depommier and R. Poutissou Universile de Montreal, Montreal, P.Q., Canada II3C 3J7 H. Mes National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada KlA OR6 B.C. Robertson Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 The photon energy spectra from radiative muon capture on 12C,16 O and 40Ca have been measured using a time projection chamber as a pair spec- trometer. The branching ratio for radiative muon capture is sensitive to <7P, the induced pseudoscalar coupling constant of the weak interaction. Ex- pressed in terms of the axial-vector weak coupling constant ga, values of 40 16 ffp/So = 5.7 ± 0.8 and gp/ga = 7.3 ± 0.9 are obtained for Ca and O respectively, from comparison with phenomenological calculations of the nu- clear response. From comparison with microscopic calculations, values of {oT 4 Ca 16 and 12 gp/ga = 4.6± 1.8, 13.6 +}|, and 16.2 ±J$ ° . °. C, respec- •:« tively are obtained.