DOCSLIB.ORG

Finding the Continental Shelf – Integration of Geology and Geophysics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finding the Continental Shelf – Integration of Geology and Geophysics Finding the continental shelf – integration of geology and geophysics R Wood Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, Telephone 64-4-570 4867, Fax 64-4-570 4803, Email [email protected] Abstract Article 76 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) specifies how the limits of the continental shelf beyond the 200 M Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) will be determined, but it is not clear how these limits will be established along complex margins such as those that typify the New Zealand region. The seafloor around New Zealand is characterised by ridges and plateaus that reflect the complex tectonic history of the region. Rifting has resulted in crustal thinning and continental fragmentation, and subduction processes have led to continental growth by the accretion of terranes and the formation of island arcs. Analysis of geophysical data reveals the geological and morphological connection of a large continental fragment, Gilbert Seamount, with the New Zealand landmass. The saddle between the seamount and the Challenger Plateau was formed by rifting prior to seafloor spreading in the Tasman Sea. Continental prolongation to Gilbert Seamount could form the basis for extending New Zealand’s continental shelf beyond 200 M. The Hikurangi Plateau was accreted to the New Zealand landmass more than 70 Ma. The geological and morphological connection extends along the length of the Chatham Rise. Identification of the boundary between continental and oceanic rocks along the northeast margin of the plateau requires integration of all the geophysical and geological data from the region. The Hikurangi Plateau is currently being subducted beneath the North Island, but the connection of the plateau with the Chatham Rise shows that a subduction trench/plate boundary does not necessarily define foot of slope positions. The data collected as part of the Continental Shelf Project were not designed for resource assessment. However, they will contribute to clarification of responsibility for managing the resources in New Zealand’s continental shelf, and several lines show sedimentary basins of exploration interest. Introduction Analysis of these existing data included determining for each The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea area which aspects of Article 76 were relevant, assessing if (UNCLOS) came into force in November 1994. Article 76 of the quality of the existing data was sufficient to delineate the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea New Zealand’s continental shelf, and finally identifying (UNCLOS, 1983) describes conditions that allow maritime where and what kind of additional data were required. Survey states to extend their legal continental shelf beyond their lines were located to complete determination of the 2,500 m 200 nautical mile (M) Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). isobath and bathymetric foot of slope positions at intervals Essentially these conditions require the maritime state to of less than 60 M. They were also designed to demonstrate demonstrate prolongation of the land territory, and Article the relationship of the rocks on and beneath the sea floor to 76 outlines several ways in which this can be done. those onshore, and to find areas of significant sediment thickness beyond the foot of slope positions. New Zealand signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and began its Continental Shelf Project in Understanding the project requires an understanding of 1996. The early phases of the project compiled and analysed Article 76, and how the complexities arising from New existing data (bathymetry, seismic, gravity, magnetics, rock Zealand’s location along an evolving plate margin affect samples) in order to minimise the acquisition of new data. the interpretation of the Article. 2002 New Zealand Petroleum Conference Proceedings • 24-27 February 2002 1 Figure 1: Satellite gravity map of the New Zealand region showing the 200 M EEZ and the location of surveys undertaken as part of the Continental Shelf Project. Article 76 sufficient to encompass all aspects of the complex geologic features that characterise active continental margins such as Within UNCLOS, Article 76 defines the continental shelf those around New Zealand. and outlines methods to delineate its outer limits where the shelf extends throughout and beyond 200 M from baselines New Zealand setting of the territorial sea. Extension of the continental shelf gives The total land area of New Zealand is about 250,000 km2. It is the Coastal State responsibility for management of the natural surrounded by large submarine plateaus, typically lying at resources on and beneath the seafloor within this region, depths of 500-2,000 m, and deep ocean basins 4,000-5,000 m including control over the exploration, exploitation, and deep. The 200 M EEZ covers an area of about 4,000,000 km2. conservation of resources. It does not include control of the resources in the water column. New Zealand has had a dynamic geologic history, strongly affected by plate tectonic events for at least the last 230 Ma. Article 76 defines the continental shelf to consist of “the As a result, the geology and bathymetry of the wider New submerged prolongation of the land mass of the coastal Zealand continental region are complex, characterised by state”, specifically excluding the deep ocean floor with its plateaus, ridges, troughs, seamounts, volcanic arcs, fracture oceanic ridges. The maximum limit of a claim cannot exceed zones and oceanic spreading centres (Figure 1). The 350 M from the coastal baselines or 100 M from the 2,500 m continent is a complex amalgamation of rifted crustal isobath, except along plateaus, rises, caps, banks, and spurs plateaus, accreted terranes and volcanic arcs. that are natural components of the margin. Within that limit, the factors governing the extent of the continental shelf Three phases of plate convergence have affected the New beyond the 200 M EEZ are continental prolongation, the Zealand region in the last 230 My. A major period of 2,500 m isobath, the foot of the continental slope, and the continental growth took place along the Gondwana margin sediment thickness beyond the foot of slope. The continental from the Triassic to the Early Cretaceous (230-115 Ma) and shelf can be extended up to 60 M beyond the foot of the these rocks form a major component of the basement rocks continental slope (the Hedberg limit), or to where the sediment of New Zealand (e.g., Mortimer & Tulloch 1996). Accretion thickness is at least 1% of the shortest distance to the base of of the Northland Allochthon, of the order of 100,000 km3, the slope. took place about 25 Ma (Isaac, et al. 1994), and oblique convergence is occurring along the modern plate boundary Article 76 uses a number of geologic and hydrographic terms east of the North Island and southwest of the South Island. to define the extent of the continental shelf, including slope, rise, natural prolongation, submarine ridges, and oceanic The New Zealand continental block has been fragmented by ridges. However, because these terms are used in a legal at least two major phases of rifting over the last 120 My. context, even this apparent clarity of terminology is not Fragmentation of Gondwana began more than 80 Ma and 2 2002 New Zealand Petroleum Conference Proceedings • 24-27 February 2002 Figure 2: Map showing the bathymetry of the Gilbert Seamount region. The location of the profile in Figure 3 is indicated. Contour interval is 250 m. resulted in widespread crustal thinning, basin formation and As mentioned above, Article 76 specifies several criteria for the separation of New Zealand from Australia and Antarctica. determining the extent of the continental shelf. These criteria The modern plate boundary began to develop through New require knowledge of the seafloor shape (2,500 m isobath, Zealand about 40 Ma. Evolution of this margin has involved foot of slope positions, morphological connection with the rifting, large-scale transform faulting, and oblique landmass) and subsurface structure (sediment thickness, subduction. Submarine plateaus surrounding New Zealand geological connection with the landmass). Determination are demonstrably geologically related to the land territory, of seafloor shape and subsurface structure relies on analysis the difference in elevation primarily reflecting distance from of swath/trackline bathymetry data, seismic reflection/ the present plate boundary. refraction data, gravity data, magnetic data, and rock samples. All of these geological and geophysical tools are essential The subduction system north of New Zealand has migrated to determine the relationship of continental fragments and east for about the last 20 My, forming a series of volcanic accreted terranes to the New Zealand landmass. arcs that extend northward from the North Island (Figure 1). These arcs are tied to geology of the North Island, manifest Continental fragments from rifted margins in onshore features such as the Miocene volcanics in Rifted margins are often characterised by a transition zone Northland and the formation of the Central Volcanic Region. between continental and oceanic crust that can contain fragments of continental rocks of varying size. Depending on New Zealand has the unique situation of lying on both sides the extent of rifting, these fragments can be integral parts of the of the modern plate boundary. This means that in a sense continental margin with little morphological or structural New Zealand is being subducted beneath or accreted to itself. expression, connected to the margin but with significant As a result, the plate boundary does not necessarily mark the morphological or structural expression, or completely termination of continental prolongation. separated from the margin by spreading oceanic crust. Continental prolongation The two major aspects of these fragments relevant to the application of Article 76 are This paper will discuss continental prolongation across New Zealand’s dynamic continental margin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Continental Shelf the Last Maritime Zone
    Continental Shelf The Last Maritime Zone The Last Maritime Zone Published by UNEP/GRID-Arendal Copyright © 2009, UNEP/GRID-Arendal ISBN: 978-82-7701-059-5 Printed by Birkeland Trykkeri AS, Norway Disclaimer Any views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP/GRID-Arendal or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this book do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authority, or deline- ation of its frontiers and boundaries, nor do they imply the validity of submissions. All information in this publication is derived from official material that is posted on the website of the UN Division of Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (DOALOS), which acts as the Secretariat to the Com- mission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS): www.un.org/ Depts/los/clcs_new/clcs_home.htm. UNEP/GRID-Arendal is an official UNEP centre located in Southern Norway. GRID-Arendal’s mission is to provide environmental informa- tion, communications and capacity building services for information management and assessment. The centre’s core focus is to facili- tate the free access and exchange of information to support decision making to secure a sustainable future. www.grida.no. Continental Shelf The Last Maritime Zone Continental Shelf The Last Maritime Zone Authors and contributors Tina Schoolmeester and Elaine Baker (Editors) Joan Fabres Øystein Halvorsen Øivind Lønne Jean-Nicolas Poussart Riccardo Pravettoni (Cartography) Morten Sørensen Kristina Thygesen Cover illustration Alex Mathers Language editor Harry Forster (Interrelate Grenoble) Special thanks to Yannick Beaudoin Janet Fernandez Skaalvik Lars Kullerud Harald Sund (Geocap AS) Continental Shelf The Last Maritime Zone Foreword During the past decade, many coastal States have been engaged in peacefully establish- ing the limits of their maritime jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand: E&P Review
    New Zealand: E&P Review Mac Beggs, Exploration Manager 2 March 2011 Excellence in Oil & Gas, Sydney From the conference flyer - • Major opportunities and • Favourable terms and clean motivations to operate government • Prospectivity – but skewed to high risk offshore frontiers • Access to services and • Adjunct to Australian service sector skills • Major markets • Unencumbered oil export arrangements • Gas market 150-250 BCF/year • Sovereign risk New Zealand Oil & Gas Limited 2 ⎮ Outline • Regulatory framework for E&P in New Zealand • History of discovery and development • Geography of remaining prospectivity • Recent and forecast E&P activities – Onshore Taranaki fairway – Offshore Taranaki fairway – Frontier basins – Unconventional resources • Gas market overview • Concluding comments New Zealand Oil & Gas Limited 3 ⎮ Regulatory Framework for Oil & Gas E&P in New Zealand • Mineral rights to petroleum vested in the Crown, 1937 • Crown Minerals Act 1991 • Royalty and tax take provides for excellent returns to developer/producer (except for marginal and mature assets) – Royalty of 5% net revenue, or 20% accounting profit – Company tax reducing to 28% from 1 April 2011 • Administered by an agency within Ministry of Economic Development (Crown Minerals) www.crownminerals.govt.nz • High profile since change of government in late 2008 – Resources identified as a driver for economic growth – Senior Minister: Hon Gerry Brownlee (until last week) • Continuing reforms should streamline and strengthen administration New Zealand Oil & Gas Limited
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Interpretation of Structural Features in the Kokako 3D Seismic Area, Taranaki Basin (New Zealand) Edimar Perico*, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A
    Seismic interpretation of structural features in the Kokako 3D seismic area, Taranaki Basin (New Zealand) Edimar Perico*, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. and Dr. Heather Bedle, University of Oklahoma. Summary The Western Platform represents an important tectonic unit The basin experienced different tectonic regimes over time in the Taranaki Basin and can considered a stable region. and the hydrocarbons traps are strongly related to Although, seismic characterization of Late Cretaceous to compressive structures (Coleman, 2018). King and Thrasher Early Miocene intervals reveals changes in the deformation (1996) highlight three main stages for the Taranaki Basin styles of normal faults. In some cases, the features vary development: (1) mid-Late Cretaceous to Paleocene intra- vertically from concentrated brittle zones (main planar continental rift transform; (2) Eocene to Early Oligocene discontinuity) to wide damage areas with deformation passive margin and (3) Oligocene to Recent active margin structures composed by smaller fault segments. In addition, basin. Muir et al. (2000) relates the origin of the basin with possible correlations were presented between structural NE and NNE basement faults formed during mid-Cretaceous features and siliciclastic deposits. Key takeaways from this due to the break-up of Gondwana. Considering the main research can be applied to areas with high hydrocarbon rifting processes, Strogen et al. (2017) recognize two phases: potential to guide the exploration of siliciclastic reservoirs NW to WNW half-grabens (c. 105 – 83 Ma) and an associated with faults. Lastly, the structural features extensional regime responsible for the formation of NE described were correlated with regional settings and help to depocenters (c. 80 – 55 Ma).
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Geology and Geophysics of the Southwestern Pacific
    UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC COMMITTEE FOR CO-ORDINATION OF JOINT PROSPECTING FOR MINERAL RESOURCES IN SOUTH PACIFIC OFFSHORE AREAS (CCOP/SOPAC) TECIThlJCAL BULLETIN No. 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS OF THE SOUTHWESTERN PACIFIC Edited by CHRISTIAN JOUANNIC UNDP Marine Geologist, Technical Secretariat ofCCOPjSOPAC, Suva, Fiji and ROSE-MARIE THOMPSON NiZ. Oceanographic Institute. Wellington Ali communications relating to this and other publications of CCOP/SOPAC should he addressed to: Technical Secretariat of CCOP/SOPAC, cio Mineral Resources Department, Private Bag, Suva, Fiji. This publication should he referred to as u.N. ESCAP, CCOP/SOPAC Tech. Bull. 5 The designations employed and presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status ofany country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of the frontiers of any country or territory. Cataloguing in Publication BIBLIOGRAPHY of geology and geophysics of the southwestern Pacifie / edited by Christian Jouannic and Rose-Marie Thompson. - [2nd ed/]. - Suva: CCOP/SOPAC. 1983. (Technical bulletin / United Nations Economie and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacifie, Committee for Co-ordination of Joint Prospecting for Mineral Resources in South Pacifie Offshore Areas, ISSN 0378-6447 : 5) ISBN 0-477-06729-8 1. Jouannic, Christian II. Thompson, Rose­ Marie III. Series UDC 016:55 (93/96) The publication of this 2nd Edition of the Bibliography of the Geology and Geophysics of the Southwestern Pacifie has been funded by the Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-Mer (ORSTOM, 24 Rue Bayard, 75008 Paris, France) as a contri- bution by ORSTOM to the activities of CCOP/SOPAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Canyon
    Deep East 2001— Grades 9-12 Focus: Bathymetry of Hudson Canyon Mapping the Canyon FOCUS Part III: Bathymetry of Hudson Canyon ❒ Library Books GRADE LEVEL AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT 9 - 12 Overhead Projector FOCUS QUESTION TEACHING TIME What are the differences between bathymetric Two 45-minute periods maps and topographic maps? SEATING ARRANGEMENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Cooperative groups of two to four Students will be able to compare and contrast a topographic map to a bathymetric map. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STUDENTS 30 Students will investigate the various ways in which bathymetric maps are made. KEY WORDS Topography Students will learn how to interpret a bathymet- Bathymetry ric map. Map Multibeam sonar ADAPTATIONS FOR DEAF STUDENTS Canyon None required Contour lines SONAR MATERIALS Side-scan sonar Part I: GLORIA ❒ 1 Hudson Canyon Bathymetry map trans- Echo sounder parency ❒ 1 local topographic map BACKGROUND INFORMATION ❒ 1 USGS Fact Sheet on Sea Floor Mapping A map is a flat representation of all or part of Earth’s surface drawn to a specific scale Part II: (Tarbuck & Lutgens, 1999). Topographic maps show elevation of landforms above sea level, ❒ 1 local topographic map per group and bathymetric maps show depths of land- ❒ 1 Hudson Canyon Bathymetry map per group forms below sea level. The topographic eleva- ❒ 1 Hudson Canyon Bathymetry map trans- tions and the bathymetric depths are shown parency ❒ with contour lines. A contour line is a line on a Contour Analysis Worksheet map representing a corresponding imaginary 59 Deep East 2001— Grades 9-12 Focus: Bathymetry of Hudson Canyon line on the ground that has the same elevation sonar is the multibeam sonar.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of New Zealand's Deepwater Frontier * GNS Science
    exploration of New Zealand’s deepwater frontier The New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is the 4th largest in the world at about GNS Science Petroleum Research Newsletter 4 million square kilometres or about half the land area of Australia. The Legal Continental February 2008 Shelf claim presently before the United Nations, may add another 1.7 million square kilometres to New Zealand’s jurisdiction. About 30 percent of the EEZ is underlain by sedimentary basins that may be thick enough to generate and trap petroleum. Although introduction small to medium sized discoveries continue to be made in New Zealand, big oil has so far This informal newsletter is produced to tell the eluded the exploration companies. industry about highlights in petroleum-related research at GNS Science. We want to inform Exploration of the New Zealand EEZ has you about research that is going on, and barely started. Deepwater wells will be provide useful information for your operations. drilled in the next few years and encouraging We welcome your opinions and feedback. results would kick start the New Zealand deepwater exploration effort. Research Petroleum research at GNS Science efforts have identified a number of other potential petroleum basins around New Our research programme on New Zealand's Zealand, including the Pegasus Sub-basin, Petroleum Resources receives $2.4M p.a. of basins in the Outer Campbell Plateau, the government funding, through the Foundation of deepwater Solander Basin, the Bellona Basin Research Science and Technology (FRST), between the Challenger Plateau and Lord and is one of the largest research programmes in GNS Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Page numbers in italic denote Figures. Page numbers in bold denote Tables. Abarratia quarry 188, 190, 192 continental rift margins 1, 53–54, 172–176 accommodation space, rifted continental margins Bay of Biscay and Western Pyrenees 176–199 172–173, 174, 175, 181, 182, 192, 193, 197 Iberia–Newfoundland margin 54–84 Adelaide Supergroup 270, 271, 272–273, 273, 288 magma-poor 240, 243 Adria margin 207, 208, 209, 225 Cretaceous, Hegang Basin 91–114 Adriatic ocean–continent transition 205, 224, 230 Curnamona Craton 270, 271, 272 Alentejo Basin 55 Algarve Basin 55 Da’an Formation 92 Alpine Fault, New Zealand 47 Dampier Ridge 10, 11, 14 Alps, hyperextended margin models 2, 243, 246 de Greer Fault 144, 147 Antes black shale 126, 127, 133 Deep Galicia Margin Appalachian Basin 120 Barremian–Albian sediments 64, 67–68, 76,81 Appalachian margin, foreland basins 120–137 crustal thinning 82–83 Aptian, Iberia–Newfoundland margin 80 hyper-extension 57, 58, 63 Arrouy thrust system 190, 191, 192 Tithonian sediments 62, 64, 70, 72 Arzacq–Maule´on Basin 176, 186, 187–192 Valanginian–Hauterivian 62, 64, 67, 71, 74,81 sedimentary evolution 188–189 Deep-water Taranaki 36, 38, 39,46 see also Maule´on Basin Delamerian Fold Belt 270, 271 Avalonian terrane 54 Delamerian–Ross Orogeny 273, 274, 288, 289, 294 Denglouku Formation 92, 111, 112 Barail Group see Disang–Barail Flysch Belt Depotbugt Basin 148, 151, 152, 155, 163, 164–165 Barremian–Albian rift event 67–68, 76–77,81 Dergholm Granite 279 Bay of Biscay Dimboola Igneous Complex 273, 274, 282, 291, 294 geological
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Makeshift Sandbag Groynes on Coastal Geomorphology: a Case Study at Columbus Bay, Trinidad
    Environment and Natural Resources Research; Vol. 4, No. 1; 2014 ISSN 1927-0488 E-ISSN 1927-0496 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Impact of Makeshift Sandbag Groynes on Coastal Geomorphology: A Case Study at Columbus Bay, Trinidad Junior Darsan1 & Christopher Alexis2 1 University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad 2 Institute of Marine Affairs, Chaguaramas, Trinidad Correspondence: Junior Darsan, Department of Geography, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 7, 2014 Accepted: February 7, 2014 Online Published: February 19, 2014 doi:10.5539/enrr.v4n1p94 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v4n1p94 Abstract Coastal erosion threatens coastal land which is an invaluable limited resource to Small Island Developing States (SIDS). Columbus Bay, located on the south-western peninsula of Trinidad, experiences high rates of coastal erosion which has resulted in the loss of millions of dollars to coconut estate owners. Owing to this, three makeshift sandbag groynes were installed in the northern region of Columbus Bay to arrest the coastal erosion problem. Beach profiles were conducted at eight stations from October 2009 to April 2011 to determine the change in beach widths and beach volumes along the bay. Beach width and volume changes were determined from the baseline in October 2009. Additionally, a generalized shoreline response model (GENESIS) was applied to Columbus Bay and simulated a 4 year model run. Results indicate that there was an increase in beach width and volume at five stations located within or adjacent to the groyne field.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Beach, One Wave at a Time New Research Is Deciphering How Currents, Waves, and Sands Change Our Shorelines
    http://oceanusmag.whoi.edu/v43n1/raubenheimer.html Shaping the Beach, One Wave at a Time New research is deciphering how currents, waves, and sands change our shorelines By Britt Raubenheimer, Associate Scientist nearshore region—the stretch of sand, for a beach to erode or build up. Applied Ocean Physics & Engineering Dept. rock, and water between the dry land be- Understanding beaches and the adja- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution hind the beach and the beginning of deep cent nearshore ocean is critical because or years, scientists who study the water far from shore. To comprehend and nearly half of the U.S. population lives Fshoreline have wondered at the appar- predict how shorelines will change from within a day’s drive of a coast. Shoreline ent fickleness of storms, which can dev- day to day and year to year, we have to: recreation is also a significant part of the astate one part of a coastline, yet leave an • decipher how waves evolve; economy of many states. adjacent part untouched. One beach may • determine where currents will form For more than a decade, I have been wash away, with houses tumbling into the and why; working with WHOI Senior Scientist Steve sea, while a nearby beach weathers a storm • learn where sand comes from and Elgar and colleagues across the coun- without a scratch. How can this be? where it goes; try to decipher patterns and processes in The answers lie in the physics of the • understand when conditions are right this environment. Most of our work takes A Mess of Physics Near the Shore Many forces intersect and interact in the surf and swash zones of the coastal ocean, pushing sand and water up, down, and along the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PILOT PROJECT SAND GROYNES DELFLAND COAST R. Hoekstra1
    PILOT PROJECT SAND GROYNES DELFLAND COAST R. Hoekstra1, D.J.R. Walstra1,2 , C.S Swinkels1 In October and November 2009 a pilot project has been executed at the Delfland Coast in the Netherlands, constructing three small sandy headlands called Sand Groynes. Sand Groynes are nourished from the shore in seaward direction and anticipated to redistribute in the alongshore due to the impact of waves and currents to create the sediment buffer in the upper shoreface. The results presented in this paper intend to contribute to the assessment of Sand Groynes as a commonly applied nourishment method to maintain sandy coastlines. The morphological evolution of the Sand Groynes has been monitored by regularly conducting bathymetry surveys, resulting in a series of available bathymetry surveys. It is observed that the Sand Groynes have been redistributed in the alongshore, mainly in northward direction driven by dominant southwesterly wave conditions. Furthermore, data analysis suggests that Sand Groynes have a trapping capacity for alongshore supplied sand originating from upstream located Sand Groynes. A Delft3D numerical model has been set up to verify whether the morphological evolution of Sand Groynes can be properly hindcasted. Although the model has been set up in 2DH mode, hindcast results show good agreement with the morphological evolution of Sand Groynes based on field data. Trends of alongshore redistribution of Sand Groynes are well reproduced. Still the model performance could be improved, for instance by implementation of 3D velocity patterns and by a more accurate schematization of sediment characteristics. Keywords: Sand Groyne, Delfland Coast, sand nourishment, sediment transport, Delft3D INTRODUCTION Objective The main objective of this paper is to asses an innovative sand nourishment method to maintain a sandy coastline, by constructing small sandy headlands in the upper shoreface called Sand Groynes (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Structural Investigation and Reservoir Characterization of the Moki Formation in Maar Field, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Fall 2015 Seismic structural investigation and reservoir characterization of the Moki Formation in Maar Field, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand Mohammed Dhaifallah M Alotaibi Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Department: Recommended Citation Alotaibi, Mohammed Dhaifallah M, "Seismic structural investigation and reservoir characterization of the Moki Formation in Maar Field, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand" (2015). Masters Theses. 7459. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7459 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. iii SEISMIC STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION AND RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MOKI FORMATION IN MAAR FIELD, TARANAKI BASIN, NEW ZEALAND By MOHAMMED DHAIFALLAH M ALOTAIBI A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS 2015 Approved by Dr. Kelly Liu, Advisor Dr. Stephen Gao Dr. Neil Anderson iv 2015 Mohammed Dhaifallah M Alotaibi All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT The Maari Field is a large oil field located in the southern part of the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. The field is bounded by two major structures, the Eastern Mobile Belt and Western Stable Platform. The Maari Field produces 40,000 BOPD (Barrels of Oil per Day) from five wells from reservoirs in the Moki Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Ocean
    THE OPEN OCEAN Grade 5 Unit 6 THE OPEN OCEAN How much of the Earth is covered by the ocean? What do we mean by the “open ocean”? How do we describe the open oceans of Hawai’i? The World’s Oceans The ocean is the world’s largest habitat. It covers about 70% of the Earth’s surface. Scientists divide the ocean into two main zones: Pelagic Zone: The open ocean that is not near the coast. pelagic zone Benthic Zone: The ocean bottom. benthic zone Ocean Zones pelagic zone Additional Pelagic Zones Photic zone Aphotic zone Pelagic Zones The Hawaiian Islands do not have a continental shelf Inshore: anything within 100 meters of shore Offshore : anything over 500 meters from shore Inshore Ecosystems Offshore Ecosystems Questions 1.) How much of the Earth is covered by the ocean? Questions 1.) How much of the Earth is covered by the ocean? Answer: 70% of the Earth is covered by ocean water. Questions 2.) What are the two MAIN zones of the ocean? Questions 2.) What are the two MAIN zones of the ocean? Answer: Pelagic Zone-the open ocean not near the coast. Benthic Zone-ocean bottom. Questions 3.) What are some other zones within the Pelagic Zone or Open Ocean? Questions 3.) What are some other zones within the Pelagic Zone or Open Ocean? Answer: Photic zone- where sunlight penetrates Aphotic zone- where sunlight cannot penetrate Neritic zone- over the continental shelf Oceanic zone- beyond the continental shelf Questions 4.) What is inshore? What is offshore? Questions 4.) What is inshore? What is offshore? Answer: Inshore: anything within 100 meters of shore Offshore: anything over 500 meters from shore .
    [Show full text]