sign in sign up
<<
Home , Dual photon

arXiv:2010.15610v2 [hep-th] 14 Jan 2021 clycreae,adw omn nvrosphenomenolog- various on comment dynam- we are and duals correlated, matter ically dark their known and the fields approach, Model h new Standard the this to in resolution Furthermore stringy problem. intrinsic archy an providing as well as [ gravity axio ubiquitous and the system on (“axilaton”) only rely that models toy -like eeaie emti hs-pc omlto fsrn t string [ of ory formulation phase-space geometric generalized [ theory string of aspects various on work prescient hc,t rtodrin order first to which, respectively. by scales, (Planc stable energy) UV (dark radiatively stable IR radiatively is and the scale of mean Higgs geometric the the being that out pointed was non- the of expansion an in term scale, [ commutative order (zeroth) observed the leading curva of the overall dual the the from of induced ture naturally is energy dark that [ foundations quantum field [ non-commutative in theory developments recent some as well as u set fsrn hoy[ theory v string within of discussion aspects recent of ous lot a excited has energy dark of hc lrfismn onainlise on nteclassi [ the theory string in of found discussion issues textbook foundational many clarifies which t [ string of ory implications world real and foundations deep The INTRODUCTION 1. DOI: problem Keywords: Abstract Physics Energy High in Letters nti ae ecnie h nlso fteda matter dual the of inclusion the consider we paper this In 1 14 r tl hoddi ytr.I atclr h problem the particular, In mystery. in shrouded still are ] a enrcnl eeoe.Wti hsframework, this Within developed. recently been has ] 9 ,dul edter [ theory field double ], tigTer,teDr etradteHeacyProblem Hierarchy the and Sector Dark the Theory, String tigter,dr nry akmte,hierarchy matter, , dark theory, string nsprymtyadholography. and s which on theory, string of cosmi formulation stringy non-perturbative the hie new of the deformation on non-holomorphic view a new on this based that find We problem. hierarchy thi the of and me signatures geometric phenomenological a various being on by comment also stable theor radiatively string is of scale formulation Higgs This the othe matter. the visible on proble the matter, to dark hierarchy dual while spacetime the dual framewor the this and of In geometry theory. matter string of dark formulation energy, commutative dark discuss We 1 λ eateto hsc n srnm,Uiest fNwHamp New of University Astronomy, and Physics of Department n sraie ncranstringy-cosmic- certain in realized is and , 2 eateto hsc n srnm,Hwr nvriy Wa University, Howard Astronomy, and Physics of Department λ 12 a eitrrtda h akmatter dark the as interpreted be can , , 13 2 , ,agnrc non-commutatively generic, a ], 3 , 10 4 3 .Mtvtdi atb some by part in Motivated ]. ,qatmgaiy[ gravity quantum ], e Berglund, Per eateto hsc,Vrii eh lcsug A24061 VA Blacksburg, Tech, Virginia Physics, of Department 1 ,i a eetyshown recently was it ], 16 .I atclr it particular, In ]. 15 .Ti fetis effect This ]. 1 rsa H¨ubsch,Tristan 5 , 11 6 , and ] 7 , ari- ier- he- he- 8 n- k) ], c - 1 ihwrdhe coordinates worldsheet with o h rtclbsncsrn)cmietesm( sum the combine string) bosonic critical the for .GNRLSRN HOYADDARK AND THEORY STRING GENERAL 2. supersymmetry well of as emergence . theory the and M illuminates on and theory, light F sheds as which theory, string form of non-perturbative new lation a for proposal a a string. present on we cosmic nally, based stringy model the toy of a deformation within non-holomorphic problem hierarchy the th on discuss we view particular, In problem theory. string hierarchy of the context the and in matter dark energy, ap dark new to com this proach of also signatures We phenomenological correlation. other about this ment from stemming signatures ical eaint akeeg.Floigtercn icsinin non- discussion recent generic the the Following energy. it dark and of to theory relation string review of a formulation doubled with and commutative discussion our begin We hoywihwl edsusdi section in discussed be will which theory the is point starting the iainrnesteduld“hs-pc”operators “phase-space” doubled the renders tization ymti ypetcstructure symplectic symmetric ifrne( difference string. pciey enn h ocle ongoer [ geometry Born so-called the defining spectively, inmetric tion 1 hsfruainas ed oantrlpooa o non-p a for proposal natural a to leads also formulation This 2 S ssniiebt oteI n Vsae and scales UV and IR the to both sensitive is y ENERGY eslgto hoyadFter,a elas well as theory, F and theory M on light heds str ch n jrj Minic Djordje and akeeg sgnrtdb h dynamical the by generated is energy dark k no aitvl tbeU n Rsae.We scales. IR and UV stable radiatively of an oe praht akeeg,dr matter dark energy, dark to approach novel s 1 tig ial,w ics rpslfra for proposal a discuss we Finally, string. c = ad oe rmtedgeso freedom of degrees the from comes hand, r h uulycmail yaia ed r h anti- the are fields dynamical compatible mutually The acypolmi elzdi o model toy a in realized is problem rarchy 4 1 π x ˜ η ntecneto eea non- general a of context the in m a Z hr,Dra,N 32,USA 03824, NH Durham, shire, ftelf-adright-moving and left- the of ) AB τ hntn .. 05,USA 20059, D.C., shington, , σ h n h obe ymti metric symmetric doubled the and ∂ τ X A USA , chiral ( η AB 3 τ + tigwrdhe description worldsheet string , σ ω 7 and , ω AB fti paper. this of AB ) h ymti polariza- symmetric the , − X ∂ A σ ( X τ HPx,xx 2021 xxx, xx, LHEP , A hrlbosons chiral σ H ) AB ( , A rubtv string erturbative i ∂ x = σ 14 a X n the and ) ,...,26, , . . . 1, .Quan- ]. H B AB X (1) , snew is nthe on ˆ A [ re- , 14 Fi- u- = ], s - - Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021

a (xˆ /λ, x˜ˆa/λ) inherently non-commutative, inducing [14] produces a positive cosmological constant Λ > 0. Hence, the weakness of gravity is determined by the size of the canonically Xˆ A Xˆ B AB [ , ]= iω , (2) conjugate dual space, while the smallness of the cosmological constant is given by its curvature. In particular we have: or, in components, for constant non-zero ωAB, g(x) R(x)+ ... a ˆ 2 a a b ˆ ˆ S¯ = X − + ... (6) [xˆ , x˜b]= 2πiλ δb , [xˆ , xˆ ]= 0 =[x˜a, x˜b], (3) R p   X g(x) R p− where λ denotes the fundamental length scale, such as the fun- which leads to a seesaw like formula for the cosmological con- damental Planck scale, ǫ = 1/λ is the corresponding funda- stant, discussed below. mental energy scale and the string tension is α = λ/ǫ = λ2; ′ So far, we have omitted the matter sector explicitly. In what see also Sect. 6. Note that the Hamiltonian and diffeomorphism follows, we argue the dual part of the matter sector appears as constraints, ∂ XA H ∂ XB = 0 and ∂ XAη ∂ XB = 0, re- σ AB σ σ AB σ , which is in turn both sensitive to dark energy [18] spectively, are treated on the equal footing. In particular, the and also dynamically correlated with the visible matter. We usual spacetime interpretation of the zero mode sector of string next focus on this dark matter, and emphasize the unity of theory [1] is tied to the solution of the diffeomorphism con- the description of the entire dark energy and matter sector, in- straint by level matching. In this more general and generi- duced and determined by the properties of the dual spacetime, cally non-commutative formulation, the spacetime interpreta- as predicted by this general, non-commutatively phase-space tion is replaced by a modular spacetime (or quantum space- doubled formulation of . time) realization (also found in the context of quantum foun- dations) [14]. Thus, all effective fields must be regarded as bi- local φ(x, x˜) [14], subject to (3), and therefore inherently non- 3. DARK SECTOR AND THE HIERARCHY local in the conventional xa-spacetime. Such non-commutative field theories [9] generically display a mixing between the ul- PROBLEM traviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) physics with continuum lim- its defined via a double-scale renormalization group (RG) and We have already emphasized that in this generic non- the self-dual fixed points [9], [14]. This has profound implica- commutative formulation of string theory, all effective fields tions for the generic physics of string theory, and in particular must be regarded a priori as bi-local φ(x, x˜) [14], subject to (3). the problems of dark energy, dark matter and the separation of Moreover, the fields are doubled as well, and thus for every scales that goes beyond the realm of effective field theory. φ(x, x˜) there exists a dual φ˜(x, x˜). This can be easily seen in the background field approach, which we will consider in the In [15] we have argued that the generalized geometric next section. Therefore, in general, to lowest (zeroth) order of formulation of string theory discussed above provides for an nc the expansion in the non-commutative parameter λ Seff takes effective description of dark energy that is consistent with the following form (that also includes the matter sector and its a de Sitter spacetime. This is due to the theory’s chirally dual), which generalizes equation (5) (and where, once again, and non-commutatively (3) doubled realization of the target the corresponding Planck lengths are set to one): space and the stringy effective on the doubled non- a commutative (3) spacetime (x , x˜a) g(x) g˜(x˜) R(x)+R˜ (x˜)+Lm(A(x, x˜))+L˜ dm(A˜(x, x˜)) . (7) ZZ q h i Snc = Tr g(x, x˜) R(x, x˜)+ L (x, x˜)+ ... , (4) Here the A fields denote the usual fields, and eff ZZ m q   the A˜ are their duals, as predicted by the general formulation including the matter Lagrangian Lm and with the correspond- of quantum theory that is sensitive to the minimal length (the ing Planck lengths set to one. (The ellipses denote higher-order non-commutative parameter λ [14]). In the following section curvature terms induced by string theory.) This result can be we will elaborate more explicitly on the dual matter degrees of understood as a generalization of the famous calculation by freedom. Right now we are concerned with the generalization nc of the discussion summarized in the previous section. Friedan [17]. Using (3), Seff clearly expands into numerous terms with different powers of λ, which upon x˜-integration After integrating over the dual spacetime, and after taking and from the x-space vantage point produce various effective into account T-duality, equation (6) now reads:2 terms. Dropping Lm for now, to lowest (zeroth) order of the ex- nc g(x) R(x)+ Lm(x)+ L˜ (x) pansion in the non-commutative parameter λ of Seff takes the ¯ X dm S′ = p− + ... (8) form R  g(x)  X − S = g(x) g˜(x˜) R(x)+ R˜ (x˜) , (5) R p ZZ − q− q−   The proposal here is that the dual sector (as already indicated a remarkable result which first was obtained almost three in the previous section) should be interpreted as the dark mat- decades ago by Tseytlin [7], effectively neglecting ωAB in (2) ter sector, which is correlated to the visible sector via the dark by assuming that [xˆ, x˜ˆ]= 0[7]. 2Tseytlin’s proposal has been further explored by Davidson and Rubin who In this leading limit, the x˜-integration in the first term of (5) in particular showed that the cosmological constant is necessarily non-negative defines the gravitational constant GN, and in the second term definite [19]. 2 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021 energy sector, as discussed in [18]. We emphasize the unity of normal ordering produces σ. This is an effective realization of the description of the entire dark sector based on the properties the sequester mechanism in a non-commutative phase of string of the dual spacetime, as predicted by the generic formulation theory. One important lesson here is, that the low energy effec- of string theory (as a quantum theory with a dynamical Born tive description of the generic string theory is, to lowest order, geometry) [14]. a sequestered effective field theory, and more generally, a non- commutative effective field theory [9] of a new kind, which is Let us turn off the dynamical part of gravity and consider defined within a doubled RG, which is covariant with respect the . First we have to the UV and IR cut-offs, and which is endowed with a self- dual fixed point [14]. S = g(x)g˜(x˜) L (A(x, x˜))+ L˜ (A˜(x, x˜)) , (9) 0 ZZ m dm − q   which leads to the following non-extensive action to lowest or- 4. DARK MATTER AND STRING THEORY der in Λ

g(x) Lm(x)+ L˜ dm(x) In this section we elaborate on the dual matter degrees of free- S¯ = X − + ... (10) 0 R p   dom and the explicit appearance of dark matter in the gen- X g(x) R p− eral formulation of string theory [14]. The previous discussion after integrating over the dual spacetime. looked at the stringy effective action to lowest order in Λ, ne- This implies a seesaw formula which involves the matter glecting the non-commutative aspect of the generalized geo- scale from the matter (and dark matter) part of the action and metric description of the string worldsheet (1). In order to see the effect of the leading order correction in Λ of (7) we consider the scales related to the UV (Planck scale, MP) and the IR (dark ch energy scale, MΛ): the zero modes of Sstr. The associated action is fixed by 2 the symmetries of the chiral worldsheet in terms of the sym- MΛ MP MH. (11) ∼ plectic form ω, the O(D, D) metric η and the double metric H– where MH denotes the characteristic matter scale. Completely the so-called Born geometry–and takes the form (following the generally, this relation follows from the diffeomorphism con- general results for the chiral string worldsheet description[14], straint of the chiral string worlsheet, which is controlled by the O(d, d) bi-orthogonal metric η, and which implies, in the limit S = px˙ + p˜x˜˙ λ2 pp˜˙ Nh Nd˜ (13) MP Z of zero modes (and zero momenta) that EE˜ = M2. Here E and τ − − −  E˜ are the energy scales in the observed and dual spacetime, re- Here the Hamiltonian constraint, fixed by the double metric, is spectively, and M is a new (mass) parameter. Since the IR (dark given by h = p2 + p˜2 + m2, and the diffeomorphism constraint, energy) scale can be interpreted as the vacuum energy,which in fixed by the O(D, D) metric, is d = pp˜ M2. These constraints − the matter sector is controlled by the Higgs potential, M natu- are inherited from the quantization of chiral worlsheet theory. 2 rally sets the Higgs scale, MH, which is indeed the case numeri- Finally, the symplectic structure fixes the λ pp˜˙ term. Note that cally. If we remember that the geometry of the dual spacetime is m2 should not be confused with the (mass)2 of a particle exci- responsible for the origin of dark energy, then the dual energy tation. In parallel with the usual discussion found in introduc- E˜ can be set to the dark energy scale. Then the fundamental en- tory chapters of textbooks on quantum field theory one has to ergy scale E in the observed spacetime is the Planck scale. This understand the representation theory associated with the sym- mixing of the UV and IR scales in a fully covariant formulation metries of the underlying Born geometry, and interpret m2 and is a unique feature of the chiral string worldsheet theory. (For M2 in terms of the relevant Casimirs in the full representation other approaches to the hierarchy problem which mix the UV theory of this description [23]. We are not going to pursue this and IR scales but which violate covariance, consult [20].) question in what follows, but we alert the reader that M is a new parameter not found in the context of the effective field Note that both the UV and IR scales are radiatively stable. theory description, while m2 can be interpreted as a particle First, we note that the M is the UV scale and the issue of ra- P mass only in a very degenerate limit in which p˜ = 0 and M = 0. diative stability does not apply to it. Second, let us recall the radiative stability of the dark energy scale MΛ, the IR scale: In For concreteness, let us start with a vector background, by particular, as we have noticed in our previous work, the effec- shifting the momenta and the dual momenta by the standard, tive action of the sequester type [21] (see also [22]) minimally coupled gauge field and its dual [14]: Λ Λ ˜ R 4 2 ab pa pa + Aa(x, x˜), p˜a p˜a + Aa(x, x˜) (14) g + s L(s− g )+ + σ , (12) → → Zx − h 2G G i  s4µ4  p These gauge fields have the usual Abelian gauge symmetries. where L denotes the combined Lagrangians for the matter and Thus in the target space action for the gauge fields we end Λ dark matter sectors, µ is a mass scale and σ( s4µ4 ) is a global up with canonical Maxwellian terms (with the obvious in- interaction that is not integrated over [21]. This can be pro- dex structure) plus a characteristic coupling inherited from the vided by our set up: Start with bilocal fields φ(x, x˜) [14], and symplectic structure replace the dual labels x˜ and also λ (in a coarsest approxima- 2 2 2 ∆ 2∆ 1 F aλ [[ A,A˜ ]] + F˜ + FF˜ + ... (15) tion) by the global dynamical scale s x˜ λ x− . Also, Z ∼ ∼ x,x˜  −  3 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021 and where the λ2[[ A,A˜ ]] term stems directly from the λ2 pp˜˙- joint appearance of which is a direct evidence of a departure termin(13) by the “minimal coupling” shift (14), its dimension- from effective field theory, as further discussed in Sect 6. ful coefficient a to be determined below. This “mixing” term Having illustrated the general idea with the vector fields may be expressed as: a Aa and A˜ , the form of the corresponding action for a scalar φ τ ˜ def dA˜(x˜(τ )) and its dual φ is immediate (and similarly for pseudo-scalars): [[ A,A˜ ]] = dτ A(x(τ )) ′ , (16) Z ′ ′ τ dτ′ ∗ λ8 τ τ 2 ˜ ˜ 2 1 ˜ 1 ˜˙ ˙ ˜ (∂φ) 10 [[ φ,φ]] + (∂φ) + ... , (20) = 2 A(x)A(x˜) + 2 dτ′ A(x)A A(x)A(x˜) . (17) Zx h − L i h iτ Zτ h − i ∗ ∗ The first of these includes a (worldline-local) mixing term, to- as this would be forced in every dimensional reduction frame- gether with its value at some “reference” proper time, τ , the work. Similarly, the corresponding action for the (by ∗ integral of which (15) evaluates to an irrelevant additive con- taking the “square root” of the propagating part of the scalar stant. The second part, [AA˜˙ A˙ A˜], is far more interesting, as action to accommodate the -statistics theorem) − it provides a telltale “Zeemann”-like coupling of (A, A˜)-pairs λ9 to corresponding “external/background” fluxes, scaled by the (ψ∂ψ¯ ) [[ ψ¯,ψ˜ ]] + (ψ∂˜¯ ψ˜)+ ... , (21) Zx h − L10 i coefficient “aλ2.” This relies on identifying A, A˜ as canonical coordinates in the target-spacetime (classical) field theory. Al- where [[ ψ¯,ψ˜ ]] = ψ¯ψ˜ are non-derivative bilinear terms, accom- ternatively, in the underlying worldsheet quantum field theory, panied by “external” fluxes as in (19). This result may be jus- the A, A˜ are coefficients of certain quantum states, for which the tified by target-spacetime supersymmetry, even if supersym- [[ A,A˜ ]]-term likewise accompanies a Berry-phase like quantity. metry is ultimately broken: The indicated terms are restricted to free fields in flat-spacetime. In particular, the omitted in- Second-quantization of the action (15) in the Coulomb teraction terms here also include metric and curvature devi- gauge (and its dual) produces the following structure fixed by ations from flat spacetime. From the underlying worldline, Born geometry: or even worldsheet [14]) point of view, such terms are in- (∂A)2+(∂˜ A)2 aλ2[[ A,A˜ ]]+(∂˜ A˜)2+(∂A˜)2+∂A ∂˜ A˜ + ... duced from generalizing (13) along the standard construction Z x,x˜  −  of GLSMs [24]; the “free-field-limit” terms shown herein how- (18) ever remain unchanged. The same pre-factor is also implied Integrating over the dual spacetime (x˜), and setting p˜ 0 in → from the worldline point of view: the of each pp˜˙- the observable spacetime for consistency, poduces (with indices term in the Lagrangian (13) is a fermionic bilinear, χ¯χ, which on the respective gauge fields fully restored) couples to the same “external/background” flux (20), giving e 8 rise to a worldline super-Zeemann effect [25]. 2 λ a ˜ b ˜ 2 (∂[a Ab]) fb [[ Aa,A ]] + (∂[a Ab]) + ... , (19) 9 Zx h − L10 i λ The L10 scaling coefficient in (21), forced on dimensional grounds in this mass-mixing term, sets the scale in this novel where A˜ =def η A˜ b and f a encode “background fluxes,” natu- a ab b “seesaw mechanism,” in principle tunable to induce naturally rally at the fundamental scale λ from (3). Properly normalized small masses. In fact, the inclusion of several mass- on the world-line (17), the “mixing” term [[ A ,A˜ a ]] in spacetime a scales enables concrete models to incorporate an entire hierar- must be re-normalized by the volume of the primordial observ- chy of seesaw mechanisms, with a more reasonable chance to able spacetime, L10, prior to any compactification and inflation. approach the intricacies of a realistic mass spectrum. This term is thereby sensitive both to the fundamental UV cutoff λ as well as the primordial IR cutoff L. To summarize, the leading “kinetic” parts in the actions (20) and (21), together with the “mixing terms,” [[ φ,φ˜ ]] and [[ ψ¯,ψ˜ ]], In other words, in the observable spacetime, the visible sec- are seen to be natural: (a) by dimensional reduction from (19) tor and its dual/dark counterpart are “mixed/correlated” (19), to (20), and (b) by supersymmetry from (20) to (21). Space- in a way that is sensitive to both the UV and IR cutoffs. This cor- time supersymmetry is broken by interaction terms, explicitly relation becomes invisible in effective field theory, and it van- omitted from (19), (20) and (21), such as in the “axilaton” sys- ishes as either λ 0 or L ∞. Note that with a particular → → tem [16], and not at all unlike the Polonyi mechanism [26]; for double scaling, this term can be finite! This is consistent with a recent discussion, see also [27]. the general set-up of the chiral string worldsheet theory which has two cutoffs (UV and IR) and which generically should be In addition, pseudo-scalars such as can be viewed defined with self-dual RG fixed points. Such a correlation be- as boost generators (at least for constant profiles) between tween visible and dark matter involving an IR scale (in this the observed and dual [14]. First, note that the case, the Hubble scale) has been observed in astronomical data constant Kalb-Ramond field can be absorbed into a non- and has been studied in the context of modified dark matter trivial symplectic form (on its diagonal) after an O(d, d) rota- λ8 in [18]. However, the ratio L10 should not be naively consid- tion [14]. Thus the Kalb-Ramond two-form enters into an ex- ered to be trans-Planckian, because that would require that λ is plicit non-commutativity of the modular spacetime, and it can the Planck length, and L is the Hubble length. Instead, the two be used to rotate between observed and dual spacetime co- scales should be considered as effective UV and IR scales, the ordinates (as an explicit illustration of relative, or observer-

4 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021 dependent, locality) [14]. Since the Kalb-Ramond two-form du- dual sector acts as a source for the visible sector, and the over- alizes into a pseudo-scalar in 4d, the 4d has the same fea- all effect is to make the visible sector essentially massive. This tures. More generally, non-constant Kalb-Ramond profiles im- immediately provide a curious — and ubiquitous — mixing ply non-associative structure [14]. Thus, axions are indicators of “mass” effect, where the length-scale ratio λ9/L10 may well be non-commutative (when constant) and non-associative (when phenomenologically relevant; see Sect. 6. For every - propagating) structures in modular spacetime, respectively. dual fermion pair, there is a mass-matrix of the general form m λ9/L10 9 10 , which induces well-known seesaw relations. Finally, we note that the peculiar correlation between the h λ /L m i This includes all Dirac mass-terms, as well as a mix of Dirac visible and dark sectors, discussed for scalar, pseudo-scalar, e fermionic and vector degrees of freedom, can be also found in and Majorana terms, and may well provide a new way of gen- the gravitational and dual gravitational sectors. Thus the ob- erating neutrino masses. served gravity and dark energy are correlated via the scale of Next, we comment on other phenomenological issues asso- non-commutativity. This might have interesting observable ef- ciated with the dual Standard Model. In the dual QED sector, fects for the so-called H0 tension [28]; see Ref. [29]. we should find a dual that is correlated to the visible photon, and that is distinct from the of effective field theory. The correlation is proportional to the fundamental 5. COMMENTS ON PHENOMENOLOGI- length, and is finite even in the limit of zero momenta (deep in- CAL IMPLICATIONS frared). Also, the usual visible photon/dark photon coupling is subdominant to this term that is inherent in our story. Similarly, The most important general predictions of the chiral string in the dual of the weak sector of the Standard Model, we have worldsheet theory [14] are: (1) the geometry of the dual space- a dual of the visible Z. This dual of Z should be distinguished time determines the dark energy sector [15], and (2) the dual from the usual Z′ by its sensitivity to the fundamental length matter degrees of freedom naturally appear as dark matter and by its correlation to the visible Z. These type of correla- candidates, as discussed in the preceding section. We note tions might be found in correlated events in the accelerators, that, quite explicitly, the dark matter sector provides “sources” but which are not products of any standard particle decays. for the visible matter sector. This follows from the coupling 8 Finally, in the dual QCD we should find interesting phe- λ [[ ˜ ]] L10 φ,φ , as predicted by the doubled/non-commutative set- nomenology in the deep infrared, even though that is a very up, and provides an explicit correlation between the dark mat- difficult region to study in QCD. In particular, given the new ter sector and a visible sector. Given the seesaw formula for the view of the axion field in the above discussion we have a possi- dark energy which relates the dark energy scale to the funda- ble new viewpoint of the strong CP problem in QCD. The first mental length, which could be taken to be the Planck energy observation here is that according to [14], the constant Kalb- scale, then the dark matter is also sensitive to the dark energy. Ramond field mixes x and x˜ spacetimes (it acts as a boost that So, the visible matter, dark matter and dark energy are all re- linearly combines the spacetime and its dual in the context of lated. This is consistent with the observational evidence pre- a larger doubled and non commutative quantum spacetime). sented in [18], as we have already alluded to in this article. Also the commutator of dual spacetime coordinates is given by We emphasize that in our discussion of the hierarchy prob- the constant B Kalb-Ramond 2 form. So, for B = 0 we get just lem the UV and IR scales are radiatively stable, and so is their the observed (4d) spacetime. Also its H = dB field strength is product, the Higgs scale. This new view on the hierarchy prob- trivially zero. But H is dual (in 4d) to the axion(a), which is also lem goes beyond the usual tools of effective field theory due to constant. But B is zero (there is no preferred background direc- explicit presence of the widely separated UV and IR scales. The tion) and so this constant axion may be interpreted as a uniform usual suggested approaches to the hierarchy problem: techni- distribution for the axion (whose constant values can be posi- color, SUSY and are all within the canonical tive and negative). Now, focus on the QCD axion, relevant to effective field theory. In the context of string theory, effective the strong CP problem, and appearing in the CP violating term field theory (and the approach to the hierarchy problem via a aF F. Averaging this term, linear in the axion, over a uniform ∧ k SUSY effective field theory) can be naturally found via string distribution for this axion produces zero: ( k da a = 0, with compactifications, but in that case one is faced with the is- k ∞). For a complete argument, we wouldR− have to study → sue of supersymmetry breaking (and the fundamental question small fluctuations of the axion field in order to understand the of “measures” on the string landscape/swampland [2, 3, 4].) robustness of this new viewpoint on the strong CP problem. We claim that these issues are transcended in the general, doubled and non-commutative formulation of string theory with a fundamentally bosonic and non-commutative formula- 6. DARK ENERGY SEESAW AND THE HI- tion, wherein spacetime and matter (and supersymmetry at the ERARCHY PROBLEM Planck scale) can be viewed as emergent phenomena. Next we comment on the seesaw formula, which mixes UV The preceding discussion about dark energy, dark matter and IR scales, and the neutrino sector. Such a seesaw would in- and the hierarchy problem is based on the generic non- volve the neutrino and its dual partner. Quite generically, the commutative formulation of string theory. We now present a

5 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021 more conventional realization of the above analysis within a ∆ω of the axion-dilaton system whose effective energy momen- class of a specific discretuum of toy models [30, 31, 32, 33, 16] tum tensor is given via that aim to realize de Sitter space in string theory. In particular T 1 g gρσT = ∂ τ∂ τ¯ = diag[0, , 0, 1 ω2ℓ 2], (25) several of the features of the above non-commutatively gener- µν− 2 µν ρσ Gττ¯ µ ν ··· 4 − alized phase-space reformulation of string theory are naturally with = 1/(τ τ¯)2, and where ℓ is the characteristic length- Gττ¯ − − captured due to the essential stringy nature of the models. scale in the transversal 2-plane Y2 [32, 33, 16]: ⊥ This family of models is constructed by starting with an ∆ 2 Λ ω 2 F-theoretic [34] type-IIB string theory spacetime, W3,1 Y4 implies MΛ M /MP, (26) × × ∼ ℓ2 ∼ Y2 ( T2), where the complex structure of the zero-size “hid- × den”⊥ T2 fiber of F-theory is identified with the axion-dilaton relating the mass scales of the vacuum energy/cosmological def Φ constant (MΛ), , i.e., Standard Model (M), and τ = α + ie modulus. Specifically, we compactify on Y4 = K3 − the Planck scale (M ). This seesaw formula can be seen to or T4 and let the observable spacetime W3,1 (via warped metric) P arise in two ways: First, the formula (26) may be understood vary over Y2 , and Y2 S1 Z, with the polar parametrization ⊥ ⊥ →def × as a consequence of dimensional transmutation, whereby the ℓez+iθ = reiθ, where z = log(r/ℓ) Z, while Y4 preserves su- ∈ (modified) logarithmic nature of the transversal Green’s func- persymmetry. Finally, we deform τ to vary non-holomorphically, tion [30] (characteristic only of codimension-2 solutions) re- only over S1 Y2. By cross-patching two distinct solutions ⊂ lates the length-scales ℓ and √Λ [32]. Alternatively, the see- and by deforming the apparently singular metric into de Sit- saw formula (26) follows from adapting Tseytlin’s result for ter space, we get the final non-supersymmetric solution. The S¯ to the models of [32, 33, 16]: In the denominator of the codimension-2 solution W3,1 ⋊ (S1 Z), has a positive cosmo- above formula, the volume of the transversal 2-plane produces Λ 3,1 × logical constant, , along W , and the warped metric is [35] 2 2 def the length scale 2 g(x) ∝ ℓ ; the numerator (with ∆ω = Y − 2 2 a b 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 R ⊥ p ds = A (z) g¯ab dx dx ℓ B (z) (dz + dθ ), (22) ω ωc A (z = 0) ) − −  √Λ ∝∆ 2 where g¯ dxadxb = dx2 e2 x0 (dx2 + dx2 + dx2) is the met- g(x) R(x)+ Lm ω , (27) ab 0 1 2 3 ZY2 q− 3,1 −  ric on W . The two explicit solutions for τ are [30] ⊥ reproduces the anisotropy variance of these axion-dilaton pro- 1 ω(θ θ0) τI (θ)=b0 + i gs− e − , and (23) files, whereas the remaining volume-integration renormalizes 1 the Newton constant as required in [30, 32]. The anisotropy 1 gs− τII(θ)= b0 gs− tanh[ω(θ θ0)] i . (24) ω determines the above axion-dilaton stress tensor for the ± −  ± cosh[ω(θ θ0)] − de Sitter solution, and asymptotes to the Minkowski cosmic Given the stringy SL(2; Z) monodromy of the axion-dilaton limit ω at z 0. Note that in the F-theory limit, c → system over a transversal 2-plane Y2 in the spacetime, these ω 0 and ω 0. This singular supersymmetric con- → c → toy models exhibit S-duality. In generalizations⊥ where various figuration is deformed into a de Sitter background by turn- moduli fields replace the axion-dilaton system, this directly ing on an anisotropic axion-dilaton profile (23)–(24). Thus Λ implies T-duality, which is covariantly realized in the generic that figures in the seesaw formula can be understood as be- phase-space approach (1)–(3). ing related to the cosmological breaking of supersymmetry. We stress that our discussion gives an argument for the existence We emphasize that these models are a deformation of of de Sitter background in string theory, albeit in its generic the stringy (D7-brane in IIB string theory) [36], generalized-geometric and intrinsically non-commutative for- and as such represent effective stringy solutions (in the sense mulation, which from the effective spacetime description is de- of [37]) and not just IIB solutions. That is, our scribed by our stringy models. One of the features of this dou- solutions are indeed found as deformations of certain clas- bled and generalized geometric description is that the effective sic F-theory backgrounds, but as codimension-2 solutions they spacetime action is intensive (as opposed to extensive), which can be viewed as effective stringy solutions with an effec- directly translates into the seesaw formula for the cosmological tive “worldsheet” description that is, to lowest order, dou- constant (26). bled and generically non-commutative (as described by equa- tion (1)). Thus our deformed stringy cosmic string solutions Note that more explicitly are naturally equipped with a generalized geometric (and non- ∆ω2 π 2 M 2D 4 commutatively doubled) spacetime structure, which to lowest Λ D 2 ℓ 2 D − D 2 2 = MD −2 ( MD 2) . − ∼ ℓ  D 3  − −  MD 2  order of the doubled target space description directly connects − − (28) to [7]. Therefore certain generic features of this doubled de- In our primary case of interest, of a minimal (simple) scription, such as the intensive effective action, directly trans- supersymmetry-preserving compactification to D = 6 dimen- late into certain geometric features of our models, discussed sions, this becomes below. ∆ 2 2 8 ℓ ω π 2 M 1/ M4 MP 2 Λ ℓ 6 ∼ 7→ Λ In these string models the cosmological constant within the 2 = 2 , M M /MP, ∼ ℓ 9 M −−−−−−−−−→M6 M ∼ 4 7→ codimension-2 brane-world is determined by the anisotropy (29)

6 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021 and relates the mass scales of the vacuum energy/cosmological an exponential factor M = M exp( const. M /M ) and thus p − p i constant (MΛ), particle physics/Standard Model (M M), the vacuum energy density M2 Λ is given as 6 7→ p and the Planck scale (MP). 4 4 MΛ = M exp 8 const. Mp/M (34) More precisely, the D- and the (D 2)-dimensional char- p {− i} − acteristic (Planck) mass-scales are related by the exact expres- where M correspond to what is roughly an effective scale that 3 i sion [30, 31, 16] numerically corresponds to the inflation scale (see also [3]).

D 1 Note that (33) comes close to this, except that it is hard to set D 4 D 2 ℓ2 2(D− 2) z0 Γ D 3 1 M − = M − 2π z0 − − e − ; (30) D 2 D 2(D 2) z0 z M /M except by hand. Nevertheless, our toy model, − | | ± − | |  0 → 4 i even though realized in the conventional spacetime interpre- ℓ where z0 is the radial distance (in units of ) from the (D 2)- tation of string theory, does illustrate the main features of the Y 2 Γ − dimensional brane-World to the boundary of , and de- generic non-commutative and doubled formulation of string 1 ⊥ ± notes the “[0, ]-incomplete gamma function” for z0 < 0 and z0 theory, at least when it comes to the dark energy seesaw and | | > its complement for z 0. For D = 6, this yields its relation to the separation of scales associated with the hier-

2 archy problem. Finally, we comment on the UV and IR scales 5 5 M 2 8 z0 4 ℓ2 16 z0/2 6 M4 = ζ0 z0 − e M6 , M4 = ζ0 z0 − e , (31) in the section on dark matter and string theory. the UV (or the | | | | Mℓ p non-commutativity scale) should be considered as an effective def Γ 3 1 Γ 3 where 0 6 ζ0 = 2π ; 6 2π 14.89, (32) scale to be empirically determined. In turn, L is the primordial 8 z0 8 ≈ | |   IR cutoff. focusing on the z0 > 0 case of (30), since that enables the ex- ponential hierarchy M M .4 In turn, solving (31) for M , the 4 ≫ 6 6 cosmological constant (29) becomes: 7. A NON-PERTURBATIVE FORMULATION

π2 M 2 π2 OF STRING THEORY Λ 5/4 2z0 4 5/4 2z0 2 2 z0 e− 2 = z0 e− M4 Mℓ , (33) ∼ 9ζ0 | | ℓ 9ζ0 | | In view of the preceding discussion regarding the generic for- which reveals the effect of the z0-driven exponential hierarchy mulation of string theory and its relation to the problem of dark in the “axilaton” models [30, 31, 32, 33, 16]. Therefore, the pri- energy and dark matter, we now propose a non-perturbative mordial “size-of-the-universe-scale” L in (19)–(21) is free to be formulation of string theory (and its M- and F-theory avatars). naturally within one or two orders of magnitude of the stringy Indeed, the chiral string worldsheet theory offers such a new fundamental length-scale λ, resulting in a phenomenologically view on the fundamental question of a non-perturbative for- realistic scale introduced by the mixing terms (19)–(21)! mulation of [14] by noting the following: The seesaw expression appears to be technically natural. in the chiral string worldsheet description the target space is That is, when M ∞ the cosmological constant scale goes found to be a modular space (quantum spacetime), but the P → to zero, and in that case the dual space curvature is zero, and same can be also said of the worldsheet. If the string world- we get a flat dual space, and thus enhanced symmetry. This is sheet is made modular in its chiral formulation, by doubling of τ and σ, so that X(τ, σ) X(τ, σ) can be in general viewed precisely what ’t Hooft naturalness asks of us: when the phys- → ical cutoff in some theory goes to infinity, the small parame- as an infinite dimensional matrixb (acting on the basis of Fourier ters in the theory vanish and should be protected by some hid- components of τ˜ and σ˜ , the doubles of τ and σ, respectively), den symmetry. It is tempting to relate that hidden symmetry then the corresponding chiral string worldsheet action becomes to supersymmetry. However, this appears to be a bit too naive. Tr ∂ XA∂ XB(ω + η ) ∂ XA H ∂ XB , (35) Such conjectural supersymmetry restoration requires the van- Z τ σ AB AB σ AB σ τ,σ  −  ishing of the Ricci tensor, which requires ω 0: the vanishing b b b b → Λ∝∆ω2 0 is necessary, but not sufficient. Letting Λ 0 by where the trace is over the (suppressed) matrix indices. The → → sending M ∞ can be forced by letting z ∞ in (31), the matrix elements then emerge as the natural partonic degrees 4 → 0 → geometrical meaning of which is that Y 2 S1 “at infinity,” of freedom. We arrive at a non-perturbative quantum gravity by → —indicating some singular dimensional collapse.⊥ replacing the σ-derivative with a commutator involving one ex- tra X26 (with A = 0, 1, 2, . . . , 25)5: This seesaw formula can be rewritten in a form that is even b more appealing by relating the scale M to the Planck scale via ∂ XA [X26, XA]. (36) σ → b b b This dictionary suggests the following fully interactive and 3Note: the exponential factor [31, Eq. (15)] was inadvertently omitted in def non-perturbative formulation of the chiral string worldsheet Ref. [16, Eq. (3.3)]. Also, note that 0 6 Γ(x; y) = Γ(x) γ(x;y) 6 Γ(x), and − both incomplete gamma functions range from 0 to Γ(x).  4In the “naked singularity to brane-World” coalescing limit 3 1 5/8 z 3 1 5That the canonical worldsheet of string theory might become non- limz 0 Γ( ; ) z0 − e 0 = 0 since Γ( ; ) vanishes faster than any (neg- 0→ 8 z0 | | 8 z0 ative) power| can| diverge. In turn, moving the| | naked singularity away from the commutative in a deeper, non-perturbative formulation, was suggested in [6]. brane-World by keeping z = 0 makes the hierarchy grow exponentially, ez0 . 0 6 ∼ 7 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021

X theory in terms of a (M-theory-like) matrix model form of the fabcs( ) is a dynamic background, determined by the matrix above chiral string action (with a, b, c = 0, 1, 2, . . . , 25, 26 ) analogb of the vanishing of the relevant beta function. By T- duality, the new covariant M-theory matrix model reads as Xa Xb Xc Xa Xb Xc Xd Tr ∂τ [ , ]ηabc Hac[ , ][ , ]Hbd , (37) Zτ − 1   S = ∂ Xi[Xj, Xk]g [Xi, Xj][Xk, Xl ]h , (39) b b b b b b b ncM Z τ ijk ijkl where the first term is of a Chern-Simons form and the sec- 4π τ −  ond of the Yang-Mills form, and η contains both ω and b b b b b b b abc AB with 27 bosonic X matrices, with supersymmetry emerging ηAB. This is then the non-perturbative “gravitization of the X in 11 dimensions. Once again, the backgrounds gijk( ), and quantum” [14]. We remark that in this non-perturbative ma- b h (X) are fully dynamical, should be determined by a matrix- trix theory-like formulation of the chiral string (and quan- ijkl b analog of the Renormalization Group (RG) equation, and the tum gravity), the matrices emerge from the modular world- b vanishing of the corresponding beta function. sheet, and the fundamental commutator from the Poisson bracket with respect to the dual world sheet coordinates (of Note that in this approach holography [43] (such as the modular/quantum world sheet) — that is, quantum grav- AdS/CFT [44], which can be viewed as a “quantum Jarzynski ity “quantizes” itself, and thus quantum mechanics originates equality on the space of geometrized RG flows” [45]) is emer- in quantum gravity. (However, this formulation should be dis- gent in a particular semi-classical “extensification” of quan- tinguished from Penrose’s “gravitization of the quantum” and tum spacetime, in which the dual spacetime degrees of free- gravity-induced “collapse of the wave function” [38]. Also note dom are also completely decoupled. The relevant information some similarity of the chiral string worldsheet formulation, in about ωAB, ηAB and HAB is now contained in the new dynami- its intrinsic non-commutative form, to the most recent proposal cal backgrounds fabcd in F-theory, and gijk and hijkl in M-theory. by Penrose regarding “palatial” twistor theory [39].) This proposal offers a new formulation of covariant in the M-theory limit [46], which is essentially a par- At this point we also recall that the authors of [6] explicitly tonic formulation: Strings emerge from partonic constituents in state in the conclusion of their paper: “(1) The density of gauge a certain limit. This new matrix formulation is fundamentally invariant degrees of freedom, per unit energy, per unit space- bosonic and thus it is reminiscent of bosonic M-theory [47]. The time volume, is much less in the proper formulation of string relevant backgrounds g and h should be determined by field theory than in any ordinary relativistic field theory.. . (2) ijk ijkl the matrix RG equations. Also, there are lessons here for the The translation degree of freedom of the string center of mass new concept of “gravitization of quantum theory” as well as is in some sense doubled... (3) The familiar continuous world the idea that dynamical Hilbert spaces or 2-Hilbert spaces (here sheets should be replaced, in the proper formulation of the clas- represented by matrices) are fundamentally needed in quan- sical theory, by some less continuous structure, perhaps related tum gravity [48]. This matrix like formulation should be under- to continuum world sheets the way quantum phase space is stood as a general non-perturbative formulation of string the- related to classical phase space.” This prescient prediction is ory. In this partonic (quantum spacetime) formulation closed remarkably close to our non-perturbative formulation! strings (as well as ) are collective excitations, in turn con- In thinking about non-perturbative matrix model formu- structed from the product of open string fields. Similarly, our lations of string theory it is natural to invoke the IIB matrix toy model can be understood as a collective excitation in this model [40], based on D- as well as the matrix model more fundamental “partonic” formulation. The observed clas- of M-theory [41], based on D0-branes. However, these ma- sical spacetime emerges as an “extensification” [14], in a partic- trix models lack very important covariant properties associ- ular limit, out of the basic building blocks of quantum space- ated with F-theory and M-theory. In our proposal we can do time. Their remnants can be found in the low energy bi-local better. Given our new viewpoint we can suggest a new covari- quantum fields, with bi-local quanta, which were a motivation ant non-commutative matrix model formulation of F-theory, by for our discussion of dark matter in string theory. C C also writing in the large N limit ∂τX = [X, X ], in terms of C C Finally, it is an old realization that the 10d superstring can commutators of two (one for ∂σX and one for ∂τX ) extra b b b be found as a solution of the [5]. The N N matrix valued chiral X’s. Notice that, in general, we do × b b authors [5] explicitly state in their abstract that “consistent not need an overall trace, and so the action can be viewed as b closed ten-dimensional superstrings, i.e., the two N = 1 het- a matrix, rendering the entire non-perturbative formulation of erotic strings and the two N = 2 superstrings, are contained in F-theory as purely quantum in the sense of the original matrix the 26-dimensional bosonic closed string theory. The latter thus formulation of quantum mechanics by Born-Jordan and Born- appears as the fundamental string theory.” This is precisely Heisenberg-Jordan [42] what we have in our proposed non-perturbative formulation. S 1 Xa Xb Xc Xd (Such a bosonic formulation is also endowed with higher math- ncF = [ , ][ , ] fabcd, (38) 4π ematical symmetries, as already observed in [8].) Supersymme- b b b b where instead of 26 bosonic X matrices one would have 28, try (in the guise of M- and F-theory) is emergent from our non- with supersymmetry emergingb in 10(+2) dimensions from perturbative and seemingly entirely bosonic formulation in a this underlying bosonic formulation. This formulation real- similar fashion. This should allow going around the obvious izes the SL(2, ZZ) symmetry of IIB string theory. In this non- problems raised by the apparent falsification of supersymme- commutative matrix model formulation of F-theory, in general, try at the observable LHC energies.

8 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021

8. CONCLUDING REMARKS the Julian Schwinger Foundation. D.M. is grateful to Perimeter Institute for hospitality and support. In this paper we have related the problems of dark energy and dark matter with the hierarchy problem, in the context of a gen- eral non-commutative formulation of string theory, wherein References dark energy is generated by the dynamical geometry of dual spacetime. In particular, dark matter stems from the degrees [1] J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1 and Vol. 2 . Cambridge of freedom dual to the visible matter. This generic formulation University Press, 2007. 423 of string theory is sensitive to both the IR and UV scales. The [2] M. Grana, Phys. Rept. (2006) 91; M. R. Douglas and 79 Standard Model (Higgs) scale is radiatively stable by being a S. Kachru, Rev. Mod. Phys. (2007) 733; S. R. Green et 29 geometric mean of these two radiatively stable scales, which al. Class. Quant. Grav. (2012) 075006; D. Kutasov et al. 115 clearly goes beyond the reach of effective field theory. We also Phys. Rev. Lett. , no. 7 (2015) 071305; U. H. Danielsson have commented on various phenomenological signatures of and T. Van Riet, D27 this new approach to dark energy, dark matter and the hier- Int. J. Mod. Phys. no. 12, (2018) 1830007. archy problem in the context of string theory, and the realiza- [3] G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, tion of this new view on the hierarchy problem within a discre- arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th]. P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. B784 tuum of toy models based on a non-holomorphic deformation Steinhardt, and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. (2018) 271–276. of stringy cosmic strings. Finally, we have presented a proposal [4] C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/0509212; D. Andriot, Fortsch. 67 67 for a new non-perturbative formulation of string theory, which Phys. , no.7, 1900026 (2019). E. Palti, Fortsch. Phys. , sheds light on both M- and F-theory, and illuminates issues re- no.6, 1900037 (2019). lated to supersymmetry and holography. [5] A. Casher, F. Englert, H. Nicolai and A. Taormina, Phys. Lett. B 162, 121-126 (1985) In conclusion, we point out that the sequester mechanism [6] J. J. Atick and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 310, 291 (1988). discussed in this paper can be used to stabilize the mod- [7] A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. B 242 (1990) 163–174. uli, and that it offers a new view on SUSY breaking beyond Nucl. Phys. B 350 (1991) 395–440. effective field theory, based on T-duality and intrinsic non- Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 545–548. commutativity of string theory. In our approach SUSY might [8] G. W. Moore, “Finite in all directions,” be important for fixing the zero value of the cosmological con- arXiv:hep-th/9305139. stant only in the limit of infinite Planck scale in 4d, and, also, [9] M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, for stability of locally emergent Minkowski spacetime. Also, in 977 (2001); R. J. Szabo, Phys. Rept. 378, 207 (2003); our approach, the Standard Model does not have to be realized H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, Commun. Math. Phys. via the Kaluza-Klein mechanism and string compactifications, 256, 305 (2005). but in the context of “extensification” of the non-pertubative [10] W. Siegel, Phys. Rev. D 47 5453 (1993); Phys. Rev. D 48, formulation of chiral string worldsheet theory, in which case 2826 (1993) C. Hull, and B. Zwiebach, JHEP 0909 099 one should look for robust non-commutative structures in the (2009); O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, JHEP 1007, Standard Model, as indicated by Connes approach to the so- 016 (2010); O. Hohm, D. Lust and B. Zwiebach, Fortsch. called non-commutative geometry of the Standard Model [49] Phys. 61, 926 (2013). and its phenomenology [50, 51, 52]. This new view of string the- [11] G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman and ory should bring about a different viewpoint on the vacuum se- L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D 84, 084010 (2011); Gen. Rel. Grav. lection problem (along the lines of the attractor solutions found 43, 2547 (2011) [Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20, 2867 (2011)]. in [53]), as well as the selection of a robust quantum matter [12] Y. Aharonov, and D. Rohrlich, Quantum Paradoxes: sector which is mutually consistent with the quantum gravita- Quantum Theory for the Perplexed (New York: Wiley) tional sector and their respective duals. (2005). [13] D. Minic and H. C. Tze, Phys. Lett. B 581, 111-118 (2004); Phys. Rev. D 68, 061501 (2003); V. Jejjala, M. Kavic and ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS D. Minic, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22, 3317-3405 (2007). [14] L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, We would like to thank J.A. Argyriadis, D. Edmonds, L. Frei- Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 302–306. del, V.Jejjala, M. Kavic, J. Kowalski-Glikman, Y.-H. He, R. Leigh Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23 (12), (2014) 1442006. and T. Takeuchi for discussions. PB would like to thank the Si- JHEP 06 (2015) 006. mons Center for Geometry and Physics and the CERN Theory Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (12), (2015) 1544028. Group, for their hospitality, and TH is grateful to the Depart- Phys. Rev. D 94 (10), (2016) 104052. ment of Physics, University of Maryland, and the Physics De- J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 804 (1) (2017) 012032. partment of the University of Novi Sad, Serbia, for hospitality Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 34 (28), (2019) 1941004. and resources. The work of DM is supported in part by Depart- JHEP 09 (2017) 060. Phys. Rev. D 96 (6) (2017) 066003. ment of Energy (under DOE grant number DE-SC0020262) and L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, Phys. Rev. D 99 (6) (2019) 066011. D. Minic,

9 Letters in High Energy Physics LHEP xx, xxx, 2021

[arXiv:2003.00318 [hep-th]]. [35] A. G. Cohen and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. B 470, 52-58 [15] P. Berglund, T. Hubsch and D. Minic, (1999). Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134950. [36] B. R. Greene, A. D. Shapere, C. Vafa and S. T. Yau, Nucl. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28 (14), (2019) 1944018. Phys. B 337, 1-36 (1990). [16] P. Berglund, T. Hubsch and D. Minic, JHEP 19 (2020) 166. [37] J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, [17] D. H. Friedan, Ann. Phys. 163 (1985) 318–419. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 1681. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 1057. [38] R. Penrose, Found. Phys. 44, 557 (2014). [18] C. M. Ho, D. Minic, and Y. J. Ng, [39] R. Penrose, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 373, 20140237 Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 567–570. (2015). Gen. Rel. Grav. 43 (2011) 2567–2573. [40] N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104033. D. Edmonds, D. Farrah, Nucl. Phys. B498 (1997) 467–491. C. M. Ho, D. Minic, Y. J. Ng, and T. Takeuchi, [41] T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, Astrophys. J. 793 (2014) 41. Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 5112–5128. Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 32 (18), (2017) 1750108. D. Edmonds, [42] B. L. van der Waerden, Sources of Quantum Mechanics D. Farrah, D. Minic, Y. J. Ng, and T. Takeuchi, (New York: Dover) (1968). Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (02), (2017) 1830001.Bulg. J. Phys. 45 [43] G. ’t Hooft, Conf. Proc. C 930308, 284 (1993); L. Susskind, (2), (2018) 138–151; D. Edmonds, D. Minic and J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377 (1995). T. Takeuchi, arXiv:2005.08927 [astro-ph.CO], to [44] J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999) [Adv. appear in IJMPD; arXiv:2009.12915 [astro-ph.CO]. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998)]; S. S. Gubser, [19] A. Davidson and S. Rubin, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 Class. Quant. Grav. 26, (2009) 235019. (1998); E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998). Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 024036. [45] D. Minic and M. Pleimling, Phys. Lett. B 700, 277 (2011); [20] N. Craig and S. Koren, JHEP 03, 037 (2020). N. Gray, D. Minic and M. Pleimling, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A [21] N. Kaloper and A. Padilla, 28, 1330009 (2013). Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (9), (2014) 091304. [46] D. Minic, arXiv:hep-th/9909022; [22] N. Kaloper and A. Padilla, arXiv:hep-th/0009131. H. Awata, M. Li, D. Minic and Phys. Rev. D 90 (8), (2014) 084023; T. Yoneya, JHEP 0102, 013 (2001). D. Minic and H. C. Tze, [ibid. (10), (2014) 109901]. A. Padilla, “Lectures on the Phys. Lett. B 536, 305 (2002); Cosmological Constant Problem,” [47] G. T. Horowitz and L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. 42, 3152 arXiv:1502.05296 [hep-th]. (2001). [23] L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, R. G. Leigh, and [48] S. Bunk, L. Muller and R. J. Szabo, Lett. Math. Phys. 109, D. Minic, in preparation. no. 8, 1827 (2019); V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer and [24] E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B403 (1993) 159–222, D. Minic, arXiv:gr-qc/0211003; L. Smolin, J. Math. hep-th/9301042. Phys. 36, 6417 (1995); L. Crane, J. Math. Phys. 36, 6180 [25] C. F. Doran, M. G. Faux, S. J. Gates, Jr., T. H ¨ubsch, K. M. (1995). D. Minic, Phys. Lett. B 442, 102 (1998); T. Banks Iga, and G. D. Landweber, J. Phys. A 42 (2008) 065402, and W. Fischler, arXiv:hep-th/0102077. arXiv:0803.3434 [hep-th]. [49] A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, [26] J. Polonyi, “Generalization of the massive scalar multiplet San Diego, 1994; A. Connes and M. Marcolli, coupling to the supergravity,”. Hungarian Central Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives, Institute for Research in Physics pub.: KFKI-77-93. AMS, 2007. [27] S. V. Ketov and M. Y. Khlopov, Bled Workshops Phys. 19 [50] A. H. Chamseddine and W. D. Van Suijlekom, “A survey (2), (2018) 148–163. Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (8), (2019) 713. of spectral models of gravity coupled to matter,” [28] L. Verde, T. Treu and A. G. Riess, “Tensions between the arXiv:1904.12392 [hep-th]. Early and the Late Universe,” [51] A. Devastato, M. Kurkov and F. Lizzi, arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO]. Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 34 (19), (2019) 1930010. [29] V. Jejjala, M. Kavic, D. Minic and T. Takeuchi, in [52] U. Aydemir, D. Minic and T. Takeuchi, preparation. Phys. Lett. B 724 (2013) 301. U. Aydemir, D. Minic, C. Sun [30] P. Berglund, T. Hubsch, and D. Minic, JHEP 09 (2000) 015. and T. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 045020. JHEP 02 (2001) 010. JHEP 01 (2001) 041. Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 31 (01), (2016) 1550223. [31] P. Berglund, T. H ¨ubsch, and D. Minic, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 (18), (2016) 1650101. Phys. Lett. B 512 (2001) 155–160. JHEP 1809 (2018) 117. [32] P. Berglund, T. H ¨ubsch, and D. Minic, [53] J. A. Argyriadis, Y. H. He, V. Jejjala and D. Minic, Phys. Lett. B 534 (2002) 147–154. “Dynamics of genetic code evolution: The emergence of [33] P. Berglund, T. H ¨ubsch, and D. Minic, universality,” arXiv:1909.10405 [q-bio.OT], to appear Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 041901. in PRE. [34] C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B 469, 403-418 (1996).

10