DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Churchill County Master Plan Includes the Following Elements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CHURCHILL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Pete Olsen – Chairperson Gregory Koenig – Vice Chairperson Justin Heath – Commissioner PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS Deanna Diehl – Chairperson Charlotte Louis – Vice Chairperson Charlie Arciniega – Member Myles Getto – Member Scott Nelson – Member Shane Yates – Member Zack Bunyard – Member COUNTY MANAGER Jim Barbee PUBLIC WORKS, PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Chris Spross – Director Dean Patterson – Associate Planner Preston Denney – GIS Coordinator Diane Moyle – Administrative Assistant Photos Courtesy of Marie Nygren, MCI Joseph R. Vincent – NAS Fallon, Cyrq Energy, Bombard Renewable Energy-Enel Green Power, and Churchill County Public Works, Planning & Zoning Department Adopted on April 21, 2021 by the Churchill County Board of County Commissioners Note: The Chapter 12 Policy Plan for Public Lands has been carried over from the 2010 Master Plan. Updates will be considered following completion of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Carson District Resource Management Plan (RMP). Any comments, questions, and suggestions are always welcome. Please submit them to the Churchill County Public Works, Planning & Zoning Department: • at 155 N Taylor Street, Suite 194, Fallon, NV 89406, • by telephone (775) 423-7627, • or by email Director Chris Spross, [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in our community! 2020 Master Plan 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ___________________________________________________________________ Chapter Description Page Number Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………. i Maps, Tables & Figures ……………………………………………… ii - iii Introduction …………………………………………………………………… iv - v 1. Housing and Population …………………………………………………….. 1-1 to 1-14 2. Education ……………………………………………………………………… 2-1 to 2-5 3. Conservation and Natural Resources ……………………………………… 3-1 to 3-11 4. Hazards and Hazard Mitigation …………………………………………….. 4-1 to 4-6 5. Historical Preservation ………………………………………………………. 5-1 to 5-11 6. Economic Development ……………………………………………………… 6-1 to 6-14 7. Recreation …………………………………………………………………….. 7-1 to 7-12 8. Transportation ………………………………………………………………… 8-1 to 8-15 9. Public Services and Facilities ……………………………………………….. 9-1 to 9-24 10. Open Space …………………………………………………………………... 10-1 to 10-16 11. Land Use ………………………………………………………………………. 11-1 to 11-13 12. Policy Plan for Public Lands ………………………………………………… 12-1 to 12-23 Appendices …..………………………………………………………………… A-1 to A-2 i 2020 Master Plan 2020 MAPS ___________________________________________________________________ Map Description Page Number Map 2-1 School Locations …………………………………………………………………… 2-5 Map 3-1 Irrigated Farmlands …………………………………………………………………. 3-2 Map 3-2 Prime Farmlands ……………………………………………………………………. 3-3 Map 8-1 Churchill County Fallon Area Transportation Map ………………………………. 8-2 Map 8-2 Trails Across Churchill County …………………………………………………… 8-6 Map 9-1 Utility Service Area ………………………………………………………………… 9-5 Map 9-2 Water System Buildout ……………………………………………………………… 9-6 Map 9-3 Wastewater System Buildout ……………………………………………………… 9-7 Map 9-4 Aboveground Utility Corridor ……………………………………………………… 9-16 Map 10-1 Newlands Project Boundary ……………………………………………………… 10-8 Map 10-2 Major Water Features of Newlands Project ……………………………………… 10-9 Map 10-3 Open Space and Recreation Areas ……………………………………………… 10-9 Map 11-1 Churchill County Master Land Use Plan/Growth Management Plan ………… 11-2 Map 11-2 Gateways/Corridors of Churchill County ………………………………………… 11-7 ii 2020 Master Plan 2020 TABLES & FIGURES ___________________________________________________________________ Table Description Page Number Table 1-1 Household Characteristics for Churchill County and Western Nevada States ……. 1-2 Table 1-2 Counties of Employment for Churchill County Residents ……………………………. 1-3 Table 1-3 Counties of Residence for Churchill County Employees …………………….. …….. 1-4 Table 1-4 Churchill County Housing Inventory 1990, 2014 and 2019 ………………..………… 1-4 Table 1-5 Tenure in Churchill County ………. …………………………………………..………… 1-5 Table 1-6 NAS Fallon Workforce 2020 – 2025……………………… ………………….………… 1-6 Table 1-7 Existing Single Family Detached Housing Sales 2007 – 2019 …………….………… 1-8 Table 1-8 Churchill County Single Family Detached Housing Sales 2007 – 2019 …..………… 1-8 Table 1-9 Churchill County Household Income Breakdown/Affordability – Existing Residents …. 1-9 Table 2-1 WNC Awards to Current County Residents ………………………….…………………… 2-3 Table 5-1 National and State Register of Historic Places ………………………..………………… 5-7 Table 6-1 Employment Status: 2005 – 2018 ……………………………………………………....... 6-1 Table 6-2 2018 Employment – Churchill County and Nevada ……………………………..…....... 6-2 Table 6-3 Income Characteristics – Churchill County and Western Nevada Counties ….……… 6-3 Table 6-4 Taxable Sales 2002 – 2015 …………………………………………………………… 6-4 Table 6-5 2017 Census of Agriculture – Churchill County Profile ………….……………………… 6-7 Table 6-6 Economic Impact of the Agricultural Sector ……………………………………………… 6-8 Table 6-7 NAS Fallon Economic Contributions ………………………………………….…………… 6-11 Table 7-1 Park Features ………….…..………………………………………………………………… 7-4 Table 8-1 Fallon Urban Area Existing Paratransit Services ………………………...……………… 8-4 Table 10-1 Agricultural Trend Data …………….. …..…………………….…………………………… 10-4 Table 10-2 Available Resources ………………………………………………………………………… 10-5 Table 12-1 Breakdown of Federal Ownership ……….………………………………………………… 12-1 Figure Description Page Number Figure 1-1 Churchill County Population Growth 2001 – 2019 ………………………………………. 1-1 Figure 1-2 Churchill County Vacancy Rate by Housing Type ………………………………………. 1-6 Figure 1-3 Churchill County Adjusted Housing Vacancy Rate ……………………………………… 1-7 Figure 1-4 Housing Cost as Percent of Household Income ………………………………………… 1-9 Figure 2-1 Churchill County School District Enrollment 2005 – 2020 …………………………….. 2-1 Figure 2-2 Student Enrollment Projections 2020 – 2025 …………………………………………… 2-2 Figure 5-1 CA Trail, Carson & Truckee Branches …………………………………………………… 5-2 The Pony Express and Overland Stage Route ………………………………………….. 5-2 iii INTRODUCTION 2020 INTRODUCTION WHAT IS A MASTER PLAN? The Master Plan is designed to establish Churchill County’s vision for the future. It provides the framework and foundation for the decision making of the Board of County Commissioners, the Planning Commission, and the community on matters relating to growth and development through 2040. The Master Plan focuses on land use and development issues facing Churchill County and establishes goals and policies that address county-wide issues and concerns. It is a dynamic document that must be updated periodically as needs and conditions change. The Churchill County Planning Department is responsible for maintaining the Master Plan and coordinating implementation and review; however, every citizen in the County is responsible for the Plan and its implementation. Any action of a local government and private developer relating to the subdivision or development of land, capital improvements, and similar activities must conform to the Master Plan. WHY PLAN? A community must actively manage its growth and respond to changing circumstances if it is to meet the needs of its residents and retain an enjoyable quality of life. Therefore, on a regular basis, and at least every two years, the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners will review the Master Plan to determine if progress is being made toward the County’s outlined goals. Review of the Master Plan must include discussion and input from other County entities, state and federal agencies, and the public; as well as a review of other County plans to ensure goals are aligned and changing circumstances are addressed. This periodic review will also help to set budget priorities and aid in the implementation of the Capital Improvement Plan. HOW SHOULD THE PLAN BE USED? In accordance with Nevada Revised Statutes, the Master Plan may address, but is not limited to, the following subject matter: community design, conservation, economics, housing, land use, population, public buildings, public services and facilities, recreation, seismic safety, streets and highways, transit, utility corridor, and transportation. The 2020 Churchill County Master Plan includes the following elements: ◊ Chapter 1: Population and Housing – Past, current, and projected population and housing characteristics. ◊ Chapter 2: Education – Student demographics and projections of existing educational facilities. ◊ Chapter 3: Conservation and Natural Resources – Information, goals and policies necessary for the protection and utilization of land, water, air, and other resources. ◊ Chapter 4: Hazards and Hazard Mitigation – Information on the hazardous conditions existing in the County, and the responsibility and plans for mitigation. ◊ Chapter 5: Historical Preservation – History of the County, information on historical resources, and plans for preservation. iv 2020 INTRODUCTION ◊ Chapter 6: Economic Development – Trends in employment, industry characteristics, and resources contributing to the economy. ◊ Chapter 7: Recreation – Information on County and City parks, park facility standards, and other recreational facilities and opportunities that County residents use. ◊ Chapter 8: Transportation – Information, goals, and policies describing the County’s vision for the variety of transportation facilities needed for forecasted growth. ◊ Chapter 9: Public Services and Facilities – Information, goals, and policies describing the County’s vision for public sewer and water facilities, and for the variety of public services. ◊ Chapter 10: Open Space –
Recommended publications
  • Thesis-1972D-C289o.Pdf (5.212Mb)

    Thesis-1972D-C289o.Pdf (5.212Mb)

    OKLAHOMA'S UNITED STATES HOUSE DELEGATION AND PROGRESSIVISM, 1901-1917 By GEORGE O. CARNE~ // . Bachelor of Arts Central Missouri State College Warrensburg, Missouri 1964 Master of Arts Central Missouri State College Warrensburg, Missouri 1965 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1972 OKLAHOMA STATE UNiVERSITY LIBRARY MAY 30 1973 ::.a-:r...... ... ~·· .. , .• ··~.• .. ,..,,.·· ,,.,., OKLAHOMA'S UNITED STATES HOUSE DELEGATION AND PROGRESSIVIS~, 1901-1917 Thesis Approved: Oean of the Graduate College PREFACE This dissertation is a study for a single state, Oklahoma, and is designed to test the prevailing Mowry-Chandler-Hofstadter thesis concerning progressivism. The "progressive profile" as developed in the Mowry-Chandler-Hofstadter thesis characterizes the progressive as one who possessed distinctive social, economic, and political qualities that distinguished him from the non-progressive. In 1965 in a political history seminar at Central Missouri State College, Warrensburg, Missouri, I tested the above model by using a single United States House representative from the state of Missouri. When I came to the Oklahoma State University in 1967, I decided to expand my test of this model by examining the thirteen representatives from Oklahoma during the years 1901 through 1917. In testing the thesis for Oklahoma, I investigated the social, economic, and political characteristics of the members whom Oklahoma sent to the United States House of Representatives during those years, and scrutinized the role they played in the formulation of domestic policy. In addition, a geographical analysis of the various Congressional districts suggested the effects the characteristics of the constituents might have on the representatives.
  • Lovelock-Cave-Back-Country-Byway

    Lovelock-Cave-Back-Country-Byway

    Back Country Byways . An Invitation to Discover There is an axiom among seasoned travelers advising that the best way to get to know a new place is to get off the highway and visit the back roads, the side trails and the hidden, out-of-the-way corners where the true qualities wait to be discovered. The same axiom holds true for America’s public lands, the vast reaches of our nation that are all too often seen only from the windows of speeding cars or the tiny portholes of airliners. The Bureau of Land Management, America’s largest land managing agency, is providing an exciting opportunity for more Americans to get to know their lands by getting off the main roads for leisurely trips on a series of roads and trails being dedicated as Back Country Byways. The Back Country Byways Program, an outgrowth of the national Scenic Byways Program, is designed to encourage greater use of these existing back roads through greater public awareness. The system is BUREAUREAU OOFF LANDLAND MANMANAGEMENTGEMENT expected to expand to 100 roads when completed. In Nevada, each byway has a character and beauty of its own, taking travelers through scenery that is uniquely Nevadan, into historic areas that helped shape our state and near areas that have been largely untouched by man. They can see the multiple uses of their lands and come to a greater awareness of the need for the conservation and wise use of these resources. And all this can be accomplished at little cost to the taxpayer. Because the roads are already in place, only interpretive signs and limited facilities are needed to better serve the public.
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
  • Gravity Modeling of the Rye Patch Known Geothermal Resource Area, Rye Patch, Nevada

    Gravity Modeling of the Rye Patch Known Geothermal Resource Area, Rye Patch, Nevada

    GRC Transactions, Vol. 38, 2014 Gravity Modeling of the Rye Patch Known Geothermal Resource Area, Rye Patch, Nevada Mark R. McDonald1 and William D. Gosnold2 1North Dakota Geological Survey, Bismarck ND 2Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks ND Keywords A gravity study was performed at the Rye Patch KGRA in an Rye Patch, gravity, modeling, geophysics, exploration attempt to further define the geothermal reservoir and/or to identify potential drilling targets in the area by delineating approximate fault locations, lengths, trends and dip angles. The gravity survey ABSTRACT was augmented with existing seismic, aeromagnetic, remote sens- ing, and geochemical data. A gravity survey was conducted at the Rye Patch Known Geo- thermal Resource Area located at Rye Patch, Nevada. The purpose Geology of the study was to attempt to further delineate the geothermal reservoir and/or to identify potential drilling targets. The survey The Rye Patch geothermal area is located in the Humboldt Riv- consisted of collecting data at 264 new stations to augment data er Valley in Pershing County, Nevada. As previously mentioned, from 203 stations collected in 2008. Information from previous the study area is bounded by the Humboldt Range on the east seismic, aeromagnetic and geochemical investigations was also examined and incorporated. After filtering the data to remove the strong regional overprint caused by the large density contrast between the low density alluvium within the valley versus the near-surface higher density rock in the higher elevations, 2-D models were created across three profiles. Based on estimates arrived at by using 2nd derivative methods, fault dip angles are on the order of 80o and are consistent with previous conceptual models of the site.
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States

    Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States

    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Western Humboldt Range fault zone (Class A) No. 1635 Last Review Date: 2006-03-22 citation for this record: Adams, K., Sawyer, T.L., and Haller, K.M., compilers, 2006, Fault number 1635, Western Humboldt Range fault zone, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 02:35 PM. Synopsis This long, mostly continuous zone is comprised of range-front normal faults and piedmont faults along the prominent western fronts of the Humboldt and West Humboldt Ranges. The zone includes short piedmont faults on slopes adjacent to these ranges. The Humboldt ranges have been tilted about 10–15° east since Tertiary time. The entire length of the fault zone shows evidence of rupture since the highstand of Lake Lahontan at about 13 ka. Sources of data include detailed topical studies of the fault zone involving detailed photogeologic mapping, scarp morphology studies, and trenching; regional and detailed geologic mapping; and reconnaissance photogeologic mapping. Name Refers to faults on the western side of the Humboldt Range and comments West Humboldt Range that were mapped by more than a century comments ago by Russell (1885 #3549). More recent mapping has been conducted by Silberling and Wallace (1967 #3025), Wallace and others (1969 #3027), Slemmons (1968, unpublished Reno 1:250,000-scale map; 1974, unpublished Lovelock 1:250,000- scale map), Johnson (1977 #2569), Wallace (1979 #203), Davis (1983 #3026), Anderson and others (1983 #416), Bell (1984 #105), and Dohrenwend and others (1991 #285).
  • Historic Resource Study

    Historic Resource Study

    Historic Resource Study Minidoka Internment National Monument _____________________________________________________ Prepared for the National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Seattle, Washington Minidoka Internment National Monument Historic Resource Study Amy Lowe Meger History Department Colorado State University National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Seattle, Washington 2005 Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………… i Note on Terminology………………………………………….…………………..…. ii List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………. iii Part One - Before World War II Chapter One - Introduction - Minidoka Internment National Monument …………... 1 Chapter Two - Life on the Margins - History of Early Idaho………………………… 5 Chapter Three - Gardening in a Desert - Settlement and Development……………… 21 Chapter Four - Legalized Discrimination - Nikkei Before World War II……………. 37 Part Two - World War II Chapter Five- Outcry for Relocation - World War II in America ………….…..…… 65 Chapter Six - A Dust Covered Pseudo City - Camp Construction……………………. 87 Chapter Seven - Camp Minidoka - Evacuation, Relocation, and Incarceration ………105 Part Three - After World War II Chapter Eight - Farm in a Day- Settlement and Development Resume……………… 153 Chapter Nine - Conclusion- Commemoration and Memory………………………….. 163 Appendixes ………………………………………………………………………… 173 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………. 181 Cover: Nikkei working on canal drop at Minidoka, date and photographer unknown, circa 1943. (Minidoka Manuscript Collection, Hagerman Fossil
  • Sturtz Unr 0139M 13151.Pdf

    Sturtz Unr 0139M 13151.Pdf

    University of Nevada, Reno A Natural and Cultural History of Leonard Rockshelter, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Sara N. Sturtz Dr. Geoffrey Smith/Thesis Advisor May, 2020 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by entitled be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Advisor Committee Member Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean Graduate School i ABSTRACT Leonard Rockshelter (LRS) is located in Pershing County, Nevada. Robert Heizer excavated the site in 1950 and reported more than 2 m of stratified deposits from which he recovered a modest assemblage of perishable and lithic artifacts. Of interest to the University of Nevada Reno’s Great Basin Paleoindian Research Unit (GBPRU) was Heizer’s discovery of obsidian flakes in deposits dated to 11,199±570 14C BP (14,900- 11,610 cal BP). This possibility of a stratified Pleistocene occupation prompted the GBPRU to return to LRS in 2018 and 2019 for additional work, which produced few artifacts but a sizeable small mammal assemblage. In this thesis, I test two hypotheses: (1) the small mammal assemblage provides a paleoenvironmental record that demonstrates changing local conditions during the Terminal Pleistocene and Holocene; and (2) the shelter contains evidence of human occupation dating to the Terminal Pleistocene. My results demonstrate that the Early Holocene and initial Middle Holocene were more mesic than later periods. They also suggest that people did not occupy LRS until the Early Holocene, after which time they periodically returned to the site.
  • The Progressive Era, 1900-1920

    The Progressive Era, 1900-1920

    AP U.S. History: Unit 7.2 Student Edition The Progressive Era, 1900-1920 I. Road to Progressivism Use space below for notes A. The Greenback Labor Party of the 1870s sought to thwart the power of the "robber barons," support organized labor, and institute inflationary monetary measures. Supported primarily by farmers B. Legacy of Populism 1. Populism failed as a third-party cause but it had political influence for 25 years after its failure in the 1896 election. 2. Populist ideas that carried forward: a. railroad legislation (1903 & 1906) b. income tax (16th Amendment, 1912) c. expanded currency and credit structure (1913, 1916) d. direct election of senators (17th Amendment, 1913) e. initiative, referendum and recall (early 1900s in certain states) f. postal savings banks (1910) g. subtreasury plan (1916) 3. Though Populism was geared to rural life, many of its ideas appealed to urban progressives who sought to regulate trusts, reduce political machine influence, and remedy social injustice. POPULISM PROGRESSIVISM NEW DEAL (1890-1896) (1900-1920) (1933-1938) II. Rise of Progressivism th A. Former Mugwumps (reform-minded Republicans of the late-19 century) desired a return to pre-monopoly America. 1. Men of wealth and social standing lamented the changes in America’s political and social climate due to the rise of industrialists: monopoly, plutocracy and oligarchy. a. Protestant/Victorian ideals of hard work and morality leading to success were now threatened by the “nouveau riche,” the super wealthy, who seemed to thrive on conspicuous consumption. b. Earlier Mugwump leaders of local communities were now eclipsed by political machines catering to big business and immigrants.
  • Jewel Cave National Monument Historic Resource Study

    Jewel Cave National Monument Historic Resource Study

    PLACE OF PASSAGES: JEWEL CAVE NATIONAL MONUMENT HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY 2006 by Gail Evans-Hatch and Michael Evans-Hatch Evans-Hatch & Associates Published by Midwestern Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska _________________________________ i _________________________________ ii _________________________________ iii _________________________________ iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: First Residents 7 Introduction Paleo-Indian Archaic Protohistoric Europeans Rock Art Lakota Lakota Spiritual Connection to the Black Hills Chapter 2: Exploration and Gold Discovery 33 Introduction The First Europeans United States Exploration The Lure of Gold Gold Attracts Euro-Americans to Sioux Land Creation of the Great Sioux Reservation Pressure Mounts for Euro-American Entry Economic Depression Heightens Clamor for Gold Custer’s 1874 Expedition Gordon Party & Gold-Seekers Arrive in Black Hills Chapter 3: Euro-Americans Come To Stay: Indians Dispossessed 59 Introduction Prospector Felix Michaud Arrives in the Black Hills Birth of Custer and Other Mining Camps Negotiating a New Treaty with the Sioux Gold Rush Bust Social and Cultural Landscape of Custer City and County Geographic Patterns of Early Mining Settlements Roads into the Black Hills Chapter 4: Establishing Roots: Harvesting Resources 93 Introduction Milling Lumber for Homes, Mines, and Farms Farming Railroads Arrive in the Black Hills Fluctuating Cycles in Agriculture Ranching Rancher Felix Michaud Harvesting Timber Fires in the Forest Landscapes of Diversifying Uses _________________________________ v Chapter 5: Jewel Cave: Discovery and Development 117 Introduction Conservation Policies Reach the Black Hills Jewel Cave Discovered Jewel Cave Development The Legal Environment Developing Jewel Cave to Attract Visitors The Wind Cave Example Michauds’ Continued Struggle Chapter 6: Jewel Cave Under the U.S.
  • Chapter 3 Affected Environment

    Chapter 3 Affected Environment

    CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter identifies and describes the current condition and trend of elements or resources in the human environment which may be affected by the Proposed Action or Alternatives. Scoping and Issues Identification In accordance with NEPA, this document has been prepared with input from interested agencies, organizations, tribes, and individuals. Details of the scoping and public involvement process are discussed in detail in Section 1.4, Public Involvement, and Chapter 7, Consultation, Coordination and Preparation. In addition to the public scoping, the BLM‘s Interdisciplinary Team and the cooperating agencies were consulted to determine specific resource concerns. The issues and concerns identified during scoping, which were outlined in Table 1-2, have been considered in the preparation of this EIS. The general topic issues include the following: Energy supply to the Fallon area; Increased risk for earthquakes; Visual/aesthetic impacts; Water rights; Water supply; Water quality; Current and future management of Carson Lake and Pasture; Protection of Newlands Project facilities; Geothermal resource drainage; and Effects on operations at NAS Fallon. Setting The Salt Wells Energy Projects Area is located south of Fallon, in Churchill County, Nevada. This area lies between approximately 3,900 and 4,600 feet above mean sea level (amsl) with distinct topographic changes between the flat playas, agricultural areas, and steep terrain of the Bunejug Mountains. Climate is July 2011 Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-1 Salt Wells Energy Projects 3. Affected Environment arid with an average annual precipitation of five to seven inches. Vegetation in the area is typical of lowland and foothill areas of the Great Basin, with sparse vegetation and saline soils.
  • Appendix C Management Responsibilities, Projects, and Navy Funding Priorities

    Appendix C Management Responsibilities, Projects, and Navy Funding Priorities

    Bureau of Land Management Mission The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the stewardship of our public lands. It is committed to manage, protect, and improve these lands in a manner to serve the needs of the American people for all times. Management is based upon the principles of multiple use and sustained yield of our nation’s resources within a framework of environmental responsibility and scientific technology. These resources include recreation, rangelands, timber, minerals, watershed, fish and wildlife, wilderness, air and scenic, scientific and cultural values. NAS Fallon Mission To provide the most realistic integrated air warfare training support available to carrier air wings, Marine air groups, tenant commands and individual units participating in training events including joint and multinational exercises, while remaining committed to its assigned personnel. In support of these critical training and personnel requirements, NAS Fallon will continually upgrade and maintain the Fallon range complex, the airfield, aviation support facilities and base living/recreation accommodations, ensuring deployed unit training and a local quality of life second to none. BLM/CC/PL-01/014+1790 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page USER’S GUIDE UG-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE AND NEED 1-1 1.1 Document Overview 1-1 1.1.1 Joint Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan and Resource Management Plan 1-1 1.1.2 National Environmental Policy Act Compliance 1-1 1.2 Management Area 1-1 1.2.1 NAS Fallon Main Station 1-2 1.2.2
  • Truckee River Operating Agreement

    Truckee River Operating Agreement

    Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report Truckee River Operating Agreement Cultural Resources Appendix California and Nevada August 2004 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service Bureau of Indian Affairs State of California Department of Water Resources Cultural Resources Appendix Contents Page I. Section 1: Overview........................................................................................................... 2 A. Study Area.................................................................................................................... 2 B. Prehistoric Settlement ................................................................................................... 2 1. Pre-Archaic Period.................................................................................................. 2 2. Archaic Period........................................................................................................ 2 3. Early Archaic Period............................................................................................... 2 4. Middle Archaic Period............................................................................................ 3 5. Late Archaic Period ................................................................................................ 3 C. Ethnographic Use.......................................................................................................... 5 D. Historic Settlement.....................................................................................................