DOCSLIB.ORG

Truckee River Operating Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Truckee River Operating Agreement Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report Truckee River Operating Agreement Cultural Resources Appendix California and Nevada August 2004 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service Bureau of Indian Affairs State of California Department of Water Resources Cultural Resources Appendix Contents Page I. Section 1: Overview........................................................................................................... 2 A. Study Area.................................................................................................................... 2 B. Prehistoric Settlement ................................................................................................... 2 1. Pre-Archaic Period.................................................................................................. 2 2. Archaic Period........................................................................................................ 2 3. Early Archaic Period............................................................................................... 2 4. Middle Archaic Period............................................................................................ 3 5. Late Archaic Period ................................................................................................ 3 C. Ethnographic Use.......................................................................................................... 5 D. Historic Settlement...................................................................................................... 10 1. Exploration............................................................................................................ 11 2. Emigrants .............................................................................................................. 12 3. Settlement and Exploitation.................................................................................. 13 4. The Railroad..........................................................................................................16 5. Mining................................................................................................................... 18 6. Salt Mining............................................................................................................19 7. Water..................................................................................................................... 19 8. Lumber.................................................................................................................. 20 E. Meeting Human Needs: Service Industries, Cultural Institutions, Recreation .......... 22 1. Cultural ................................................................................................................. 22 2. Tourism/Recreation............................................................................................... 23 3. Farming/Ranching................................................................................................. 25 F. Irrigation and Other Water Management.................................................................... 26 G. Continuing Development............................................................................................ 30 H. The Newlands Project................................................................................................. 30 I. Other Depression Era Activities ................................................................................. 33 1. Truckee Storage Project........................................................................................ 34 2. The War Effort...................................................................................................... 35 3. Early Post-War Developments.............................................................................. 35 4. The Washoe Project.............................................................................................. 36 J. Other Late Developments ........................................................................................... 36 II. Section II: Summary of Expected and Known Site Data................................................. 41 A. Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................... 41 1. Cultural Resources Likely to Result from Prehistoric and Historic Use of the Study Areas........................................................................................................ 41 2. Cultural Resources in the Primary Study Area..................................................... 42 a. Approach to Analysis........................................................................................ 42 b. Nature of Impacts on Cultural Resources ......................................................... 44 Cultural Resources Appendix–i Page III. Section IIA: Cultural Resource Tables ............................................................................ 45 A. Lakes and Reservoirs .................................................................................................. 45 1. Lake Tahoe............................................................................................................46 2. Donner Lake..........................................................................................................50 3. Independence Lake............................................................................................... 51 4. Stampede Reservoir.............................................................................................. 52 5. Boca Reservoir...................................................................................................... 54 6. Prosser Creek Reservoir........................................................................................ 55 7. Pyramid Lake........................................................................................................ 57 8. Lahontan Reservoir............................................................................................... 59 IV. Section IIB: Cultural Resource Tables ............................................................................ 61 A. River Reaches and Stretches: California.................................................................... 61 1. Tahoe Release (Tahoe Dam to Donner Creek)..................................................... 61 2. Donner Release (Donner Dam to Truckee River)................................................. 63 3. Truckee River: Donner Creek to State Line (Donner-Boca Stretches Combined).......................................................................................................... 64 4. Independence Release/LTR (Independence Creek and Little Truckee River to Stampede Reservoir).......................................................................................... 66 5. Stampede Release (Stampede Dam to Boca Reservoir) ....................................... 67 6. Prosser Release (Prosser Creek Dam to Truckee River) ...................................... 68 B. Truckee River Reaches and Stretches: Nevada .......................................................... 68 1. Truckee River: CA/NV State Line to E. McCarran Boulevard, Reno (Trophy/ Mayberry/ Oxbow/ Spice Stretches Combined) ................................................ 68 2. Truckee River: Lockwood (E McCarran Blvd to Derby Diversion Dam)............ 71 3. Truckee River: Derby Diversion Dam to Truckee River Delta (S Bar S/Nixon Stretches Combined).......................................................................................... 72 C. Miscellaneous Tables.................................................................................................. 73 References Cited ..................................................................................................................... 78 Selected Bibliography............................................................................................................. 80 Cultural Resources Appendix–ii Revised Draft TROA EIS/EIR Cultural Resources Appendix CULTURAL RESOURCES APPENDIX This appendix contains an overview of the prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic uses of the study area; a condensed Truckee River historic timeline; tables that detail elevations and flows under all alternatives with specific cultural resource information in table form for each facility and stretch and two tables which list all National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties in the primary and secondary study areas. A comprehensive bibliography follows. The first section, the overview of human use of the study area, has been written with two primary purposes in mind: to describe the major prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic uses of the study area which have shaped its present physical condition and contributed to its attitudes; and to identify the physical evidence which could be expected to remain from these uses—the cultural resources sites of today. It includes three maps and table CRA.1, “Key Aspects of Protohistoric Washoe and Nevada Northern Paiute Cultures.” In preparing this appendix, the following types of sources were reviewed: studies and reports, both detailed and general, which are applicable to the entire study area or a portion of it; site forms; and a number of reports on small scale and a few larger scale archeological surveys and literature searches, often related to recent development. Reports on testing or excavation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distribution List
    Revised DEIS/EIR Truckee River Operating Agreement DISTRIBUTION LIST CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATIONS Nevada Senators John Ensign Harry Reid Representatives Shelly Berkley (District 1) James A. Gibbons (District 2) Jon C. Porter (District 3) California Senators Barbara Boxer Dianne Feinstein Representatives John T. Doolittle (District 4) Robert T. Matsui (District 5) Doug Ose (District 3) NEVADA STATE SENATE Mark E. Amodei, Carson City Bernice Mathews, Reno Mike McGinness, Fallon William J. Raggio, Reno Randolph Townsend, Reno Maurice E. Washington, Sparks NEVADA STATE ASSEMBLY Bernie Anderson, Sparks Sharron Angle, Reno Jason Geddes, Reno Dawn Gibbons, Reno Tom Grady,Yerington Ron Knecht, Carson City Distribution List-1 Revised DEIS/EIR Truckee River Operating Agreement CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE Samuel Aanestad (District 4) Michael Machado (District 5) Thomas "Rico" Oller (District 1) Deborah Ortiz (District 6) CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY David Cox (District 5) Tim Leslie (District 4) Darrell Steinberg (District 9) FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Washington, DC Army Corps of Engineers, Reno, NV Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC Army Corps of Engineers, Real Estate Division, Sacramento, CA Army Corps of Engineers, Planning Division, Sacramento, CA Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Trust and Economic Development, Washington, DC Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC Bureau of Indian Affairs, Western Regional Office, Phoenix, AZ Bureau of Land Management, Carson City District Office, Carson City, NV
    [Show full text]
  • California State Lands Commission
    STAFF REPORT 69 A 56 10/24/19 AD 671 W 503.2094 S 28 W. Crunk CONSIDER BOUNDARY LINE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE STATE, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE STATE LANDS COMMISSION AND CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNERS AT DONNER LAKE PARTIES: State of California, acting by and through the State Lands Commission All those property owners along the shore of Donner Lake listed in Exhibit A, attached (collectively known as the “Property Owners”) INTRODUCTION: In November 2016, a group of Donner Lake property owners filed suit against the Commission through a recently formed corporation known as SOS Donner Lake. The Nevada County Superior Court case, SOS Donner v. California State Lands Commission, challenged the Commission’s jurisdiction over Donner Lake and the boundary between State-owned sovereign land and the privately owned uplands. The proposed Boundary Line and Easement Agreements (Agreements) will settle this litigation, settle the underlying boundary disputes, and bring finality and certainty to an area that has been in contention since the 1970s. The proposed Agreements will fix the elevation of the low-water mark that serves as the boundary between State-owned fee land in the bed of Donner Lake and the privately owned adjoining uplands. The Agreements will also fix the elevation of the high-water mark that delineates the landward extent of the Public Trust easement. The upland owners will also acknowledge the navigability of Donner Lake, thus confirming the State’s ownership of the lakebed. To effectuate the Agreements, the Commission and Property Owners will mutually grant quitclaim deeds that will confirm the parties’ respective ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 Is a Mountainous, Deeply Dissected, and Westerly Tilting Fault Block
    5 . S i e r r a N e v a d a Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 is a mountainous, deeply dissected, and westerly tilting fault block. It is largely composed of granitic rocks that are lithologically distinct from the sedimentary rocks of the Klamath Mountains (78) and the volcanic rocks of the Cascades (4). A Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, Vegas, Reno, and Carson City areas. Most of the state is internally drained and lies Literature Cited: high fault scarp divides the Sierra Nevada (5) from the Northern Basin and Range (80) and Central Basin and Range (13) to the 2 2 . A r i z o n a / N e w M e x i c o P l a t e a u east. Near this eastern fault scarp, the Sierra Nevada (5) reaches its highest elevations. Here, moraines, cirques, and small lakes and quantity of environmental resources. They are designed to serve as a spatial within the Great Basin; rivers in the southeast are part of the Colorado River system Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the Ecoregion 22 is a high dissected plateau underlain by horizontal beds of limestone, sandstone, and shale, cut by canyons, and United States (map): Washington, D.C., USFS, scale 1:7,500,000. are especially common and are products of Pleistocene alpine glaciation. Large areas are above timberline, including Mt. Whitney framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and those in the northeast drain to the Snake River.
    [Show full text]
  • James Newlands Jr. & Audet-Ingersoll Inc
    JAMES NEWLANDS JR. & AUDET-INGERSOLL INC. APARTMENTS 1342-1344-1/2 North Formosa Avenue CHC-2017-1349-HCM ENV-2017-1350-CE Agenda packet includes: 1. Under Consideration Staff Recommendation Report 2. Historic-Cultural Monument Application 3. Letter of Support Please click on each document to be directly taken to the corresponding page of the PDF. Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2017-1349-HCM ENV-2017-1350-CE HEARING DATE: April 20, 2017 Location: 1342-1344 ½ North Formosa Avenue TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 4 – David Ryu PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Hollywood 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: Central Los Angeles, CA 90012 Neighborhood Council: Hollywood Hills West Legal Description: West Hollywood Boulevard Tract No. 2, Lot 40 PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the JAMES NEWLANDS JR. & AUDET-INGERSOLL INC. APARTMENTS REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER(S): Belmond Homes LP c/o Michael Cohanzad 11601 Santa Monica Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90025 Franklin E. and Annette M. Johnson 1342 North Formosa Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90046 APPLICANT: Jianna Maarlen P.O. Box 206 Los Angeles, CA 90078 PREPARER: Charles J. Fisher 140 S. Avenue 57 Highland Park, CA 90042 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Not take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10 because the application and accompanying photo documentation do not suggest the submittal warrants further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 30, Fall 2006
    TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST Preserving and protecting important historic, recreational and scenic open Fall Newsletter spaces in the greater Truckee region. Volume 30 ❖ Fall 2006 Fall 2006 Newsletter Page 2 WHEN IT RAINS, IT POURS Maybe it’s a sign of the times The Truckee Donner Land Trust was or just plain dumb luck, but founded in 1990 in order to preserve whatever the reason, there sure and protect important historic, seems to be a lot of important recreational and scenic open spaces acreage for sale right now. in the greater Truckee region. Properties the Land Trust has eyed for years are now suddenly P.O. Box 8816, Truckee, CA 96162 for sale. So many in fact, we 10069 West River Street, Old Tonini House questioned our capacity to fund I can however, talk in Tel. 530.582.4711 them all. But in the end, Board generalities. The lands we are Fax 530.582.5528 and staff concluded that all pursuing and “have not gone email: [email protected] of these lands are simply too website: www.tdlandtrust.org public with” have a combined important not to protect. We’d be value of over $40,000,000. They remiss of our mission not to try; The Truckee Donner Land Trust is a total over 6,000 acres. 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organization. All future generations will not easily donations to the Land Trust are tax- forgive us if these lands are lost Most of these properties are of deductible under the Internal Revenue to development. To paraphrase significant acreage with names Service Code.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT BOARD of HEALTH MEETING NOTICE and AGENDA Members Thursday, January 28, 2016 Kitty Jung, Chair 1:00 P.M
    WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA Members Thursday, January 28, 2016 Kitty Jung, Chair 1:00 p.m. Julia Ratti, Vice Chair Oscar Delgado Dr. George Hess Washoe County Administration Complex David Silverman Health District South Conference Room Dr. John Novak 1001 East Ninth Street Michael D. Brown Reno, NV ______________________________________________________________________________ Items for Possible Action. All items numbered or lettered below are hereby designated for possible action as if the words “for possible action” were written next to each item (NRS 241.020). An item listed with asterisk (*) next to it is an item for which no action will be taken. 1:00 p.m. 1. *Roll Call and Determination of Quorum 2. *Pledge of Allegiance 3. *Public Comment Any person is invited to speak on any item on or off the agenda during this period. Action may not be taken on any matter raised during this public comment period until the matter is specifically listed on an agenda as an action item. 4. Approval of Agenda January 28, 2016 5. Approval of Draft Minutes December 17, 2015 6. Recognitions A. Transfer 1. Scott Baldwin – From EHS Environmental Health Specialist to AQM Air Quality Specialist II – 1/11/16 B. New Hires 1. Sonya Smith – Public Health Nurse I, hired 12/14/15 - CCHS 2. Maximilian Wegener – Public Health Investigator II, hired 12/28/15 - EPHP 3. Ellen Messinger-Patton – Environmental Health Trainee I, hired 1/11/16 - EHS 4. Briana Johnson – Environmental Health Trainee I, hired 1/11/16 – EHS C. Promotion 1. Nick Florey – Environmental Health Specialist to Senior Environmental Health Specialist effective January 25, 2016 - EHS Post Office Box 11130, Reno, NV 89520-0027 – 1001 E.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter ‘N/A for ‘not applicable.” For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Newlands Historic District Other names/site number: N/A Name of related multiple property listing: N/A (Enter ‘N/A’ if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: 171 acres in Reno bounded by the Truckee River on the north, Arlington Avenue on the east, Monroe Street on the south, and Marsh/Keystone Avenue to the west. City or town: Reno State: Nevada County: Washoe Not For Publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x meets — does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: _national _statewide X local Applicable National Register Criteria: X A X _D Signature of certifying official/Title: i3’ate State Historic Preservation Officer, Nevada State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Esting Option in the Realm of Home- Ed Furnishing Blankets, Towels and House Was Held, Well-Connected New- Building
    FootPrints Dedicated to Preserving and Promoting Historic Resources in the Truckee Meadows through Education, Advocacy and Leadership. vol. 19 no. 3 Summer 2016 The El Renos Today by Debbie Hinman Editor’s Note: The El Reno apartments for divorce had been lowered from for rental properties. One of these at 1461 Lander are on HRPS Endangered three months to six weeks, the lowest was Roland Giroux. In late 1936, he Property List. Second, look for a list of in the nation, and those wishing to purchased Lots 1-8 in Block 3 of the the El Renos on the HRPS website blog. untie the bonds of matrimony were Sierra Vista tract from John Canson. thronging to Reno for their “Reno- This tract was on the South Virginia hat is an El Reno? This is a vation.” These short-term residents Road, just outside the city limits. question no doubt pondered (many of whom would end up staying Instead of building a large structure Wby many prospective walk- to become permanent residents, finding containing apartment units or long rows ing tour participants when they see a lifestyle or new spouse to their liking) of connected units, Giroux had a unique this offering on a HRPS Walking Tour needed temporary housing. Enterprising idea—creating a grouping of fifteen schedule. The subject was first raised would-be landlords were casting about small, free-standing “kit homes.” by Karl Breckenridge in his Reno Gazette Journal “Kit homes” first came columns some years ago into vogue in 1908 when and FootPrints followed up Sears, Roebuck & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM NAT. REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES This form is for use in nominating or requesting determi urtionMAffflNAtoHmfiiflVIGErope:___ ____ ies and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration"Form (National Register Bulletin ISA). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name:________The Patrick Ranch House other names/site number: Arlinqton Place, Arlington Ranch 2. Location street & number ___ 1225 Gordon Avenue not for publication N/A city or town Reno _________ vicinity N/A state Nevada___ code NV county Washoe code 031 zip code 89502 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility, meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of WASHOE COUNTY Introduction
    HISTORY OF WASHOE COUNTY Introduction Lying in the northwest portion of the State of Nevada, named for a tribe of American Indians and containing a land area in excess of 6,000 square miles, Washoe County today consists of two of the nine original counties -- Washoe and Lake (later renamed Roop) Counties -- into which the Territory of Nevada was divided by the first territorial legislature in 1861. The country, "a land of contrasts, extremes, and apparent contradictions, of mingled barrenness and fertility, beauty and desolation, aridity and storm,"1 was claimed by the Spanish Empire until 1822 when it became a part of Mexican territory resulting from Mexico's successful war of independence from Spain. Mexico ceded the area to the United States in 1848 following the Mexican War, and the ceded lands remained part of the "unorganized territory" of the United States until 1850. Spanish and Mexican constructive possession probably had little effect on the life styles of the Northern Paiutes and the Washos -- the two American Indian tribes which inhabited the area. The Northern Paiutes ranged over most of Washoe County2 save the series of valleys lying along the eastern foothills of the Sierra Nevada. These valleys were the domain of the Washos, a small, nomadic tribe whose members spoke an alien tongue and from which the name of the county is derived3. The 1840's During the 1840's Washoe County was traversed by a number of trappers and explorers, as well as several well-defined emigrant trails leading to California and Oregon. In 1843 mountain man "Old Bill" Williams4 led his trappers from the Klamath Lake region of California to Pyramid Lake and the Truckee River.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Districts of Nevada
    NEVADA BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY REPORT 47 Second Edition MINING DISTRICTS OF NEVADA Joseph V. Tingley MACKAY SCHOOL OF MINES 1998 UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO CONTENTS Historical background Development of mining districts in Nevada Previous work Organization of report Acknowledgments District descriptions References Appendix A List of Nevada mining district names Appendix B Nevada mining districts listed by county Appendix C Nevada mining districts listed by commodity Figure 1. Record of proceedings of miners’ meeting at Gold Hill, 1859 Figure 2. Mining laws of the Reese River mining district Figure 3. DeGroot’s map of Nevada Territory, 1863 Figure 4. Menardi’s map of Nevada, 1908 Plate 1 Mining districts of Nevada Note: Hyperlinks are denoted by underlined blue text. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION Most of the major changes included in the second edition of Mining Districts of Nevada resulted from mineral assessment work carried out in south central Nevada between 1992 and 1996 (Tingley and others, 1993, 1997). Six new mining districts, Cedar Spring, Gold Range, Jamestown, Pocopah, Rainstorm, and Trappmans, have been added in Nye County and two districts, Joe May Canyon and White Caps, have been added in Clark County. Six Nye County districts, Antelope Springs, Cactus Springs, Clarkdale, Kawich, Wellington, and Wilsons, and three districts in Lincoln County, Don Dale, Groom, and Papoose, have boundary modifications and new material has been added to their descriptions in the text. In the northern part of the state, the boundary of the Argenta district, Lander County, has been modified to reflect the development of a major gold mine; gold has now surpassed barite as the major commodity produced from this district.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Fishing Guide
    2021 NEVADA FISHING GUIDE Fishing Above Tahoe – Page 6 Kayak Fishing: A Close-Up Experience – Page 14 Photos of you! Look who got outside – Page 53 SIMPLE MODERN CONVENIENT GET ONLINE GET www.ndowlicensing.com OUTSIDE • Fishing, hunting or combination licenses are FISHING now valid for one year from date of purchase. • Trout Stamp: Now included as a built-in HUNTING privilege with a fishing or combo license. • Second Rod Stamp: Now included as a built-in BOATING privilege with a fishing or combo license. 2021 NEVADA CONGRATULATIONS FISHING to the winners of 2nd GUIDE the 2020 Nevada Free Fishing Day Poster Contest! CONTENTS Licenses, Permits and Fees 4 st Fishing Above Tahoe 6 1 The Horse is Back 10 Kayak Fishing Offers Anglers a Close-Up Experience 14 HAYDEN LAMB Selected Game Fish of Nevada �������������������������������������������������������16 Regional Fish Stocking Reports 18 3rd Fishable Waters Maps 20 Species List by Region, ADA locations, and AIS Inspection Stations Statewide Regulations 32 Reglas de Pesca 34 Accessible (ADA) Fishing in Nevada ���������������������������������������37 Eastern 38 Southern 42 AIDAN YELOWITZ ADDY SMITH Western 44 Wildlife Management Area Regulations ���������������������������������������48 Boating Regulations 50 FREE FISHING DAY Look Who Got Online and Got Outside 53 June 12, 2021 Nevada “Native Fish Slam” Entry Form 54 Trophy Fish Entry ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������55 Record Fish of Nevada 56 STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor STATE BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS Tiffany East,Chairman Tom Barnes, Vice Chairman Jon Almberg, Tommy Caviglia, Kerstan Hubbs, Casey D. Kiel, David McNinch, Ron Pierini, and Shane Rogers NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director Jon Sjӧberg, Fisheries Division Chief Chris Vasey, Conservation Education Division Chief Mike Maynard, Chief Game Warden Advertising in this publication lowers production costs.
    [Show full text]