DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution of Personnel by State-By Installation, FY-58

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution of Personnel by State-By Installation, FY-58 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE VAD-A954 671 lb RESTRICTVE MARKINGS OF REPORT 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY Approved for public release; e 2b. DECLASSIFICATIONIDOWNGRADING SCHEDUL distribution unlimiil ... : ,q~ TA-B ed C 4 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONITORING ORGANIZATION TPORT NUI SM M02 ORG/INIZATION' _ 6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING (If applicable) DoD/WHS/DIOR DIOR _ _ _ _ __.... ADDRESS (City, State, and ZlP'Ct __4!. 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code). 7b. Aw l4it Codes The Pentagon - 1 X . Washington, DC S L P ET N D'i INSTRUMENT IJENTIFICA I 8a. NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING Sb. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT ORGANIZATION (if applicable) Ii o__il DoDtS ?-A11S CAL.0 W_ __ ___E_ ______ (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUN dG 8c. ADDRESS e PROGAM IPiJT'TASK WORK UNIT ELEMENT NO. NO. ACCESSION NO 11. TITLE (Include Security Classification) Distribution of Personnel by State--by Installation (U). ;12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) 5. PAGE COUNT 13a. TYPE OF REPORT 13b. TIME COVERED 114. DATE . p " Annual6. I FROM TO , /fs-7- 16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION In Microfiche Only. (I identify by block number) 17 COSATI CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and FIELD GROUP SUP.-GROUP Item 23: *Military Personnel, *Civilian Personnel, of P 5 09 Active Duty, Military Force Levels, Department Tables (Data S 5 O1 Defense, United States, Statistical Data, 19 ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number) rrE1v2 .2". L/IA e.fO7S This report provides information on Department of Defense (DoD) personnel by operating *>- location. This information is provided in two sections showing: (1) The percent distribution of DOD active duty military and direct hire civilian personnel, by state, . according to Defense component; and (2) DoD active duty military and direct hire civilian personnel, by installation or selected city, according to Defense component. LI The earliest report of this series is dated 30 June 1956. LA. D0WNGRADED AT 3 YEARl INTERVALS; -JJ 4 DECLASSIFID AFTER 12 YEARS ( ELEC DOD DIR 5200-10 UIE 20. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNSSIFI ED 0 DTIC USERS OUNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED 0 SAME AS RPT. Code) 22c. OFFICE SYMBOL 22a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 22b. TELEPHONE (nClude Area OF THISPAGE DD FORM 1473, 84 MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exhausted. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION All other editions are obsolete. 8 06 20 018 i NCLASSIFIEO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE I DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL . I BY STATE - BY INSTALLATION I AS OF 30 JUNE 1958 I I I r I Statistical Services Center IOffice of the Secretary of Defense UNCLASSIFIED TABLE OF C01MITS Page Number I. Summary, Defense Personnel and Total Population in the Continental United States by State . ... .......... 1 II. Installations - Personnel Data Alabama ........... ......................... 5 Arizona .............................. 6 Arkansas .......... ......................... 7 California ....................... .......... 8 Colorado ............................. 14 Connecticut ............................ .. 15 Delaware ........ ......................... ... 16 Florida ........ ......................... ... 17 Georgia ........ ......................... ... 19 Idaho ........... .......................... 21 Illinois ........ ......................... ... 22 Indiana . ... .... .. ... .. ... .. ... .. 24 Iowa ......... .......................... 25 Kansas . ........................ 26 Kentucky .. ............ .............. 27 Louisiana . ...................... 28 Maine . .. ... ................... 29 Maryland ...... ......................... 30 Massachusetts .......... ...................... 31 Michigan . ........... 33 Minnesota. ....................... 34 Mississippi ....... ................... 35 Missouri ......................... 36 Montana ............................... 38 Nebraska ...... ........................ 39 Nevada .......... .......................... 40 New Hampshire ......................... 41 New Jersey ............................... 42 New Mexico .......................... 43 New York ........ ......................... ... 44 North Carolina ......................... 47 North Dakota ....................... 48 Ohio ......... ........................... ... 49 Oklahoma ............................ 51 Oregon ......... ......................... 52 Pennsylvania ....................... 53 Rhode 'sland . ..... ................ 55 South Carolina ...................... 56 South Dakota . ............... ... 57 Tennessee ........ .......................... 58 Texas ........................ ....... 59 i UNCLASSIFIED UICIASSIFIED Page Nfumber Utah .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 62 Vermont ................ ..... 63 Virginia ................ ..... 64 Washington .......... ......... 66 Washington, D. C. Metropolitan Area . ......... 69 West Virginia . ... ....... ...... .... 70 Wisconsin . .. .................. .. 71 Wyoming ................... ...... 72 ii UNCIASSIFIED L;CLASIFIED 93 v 000 0 en N t'- .4.4 4N 0 U0 4 0 n .N '0 .- o 4 C!-JNCV U:.1?'0 01 N?!1 m 888 0 0000 c 0 0 24 241 vC00 40 14 0.400,%-20 N440 0 00i 0 . am J 0.-lo. en 4 n UOCr' 4t.%P r.- 9: v 000 0 ONCi 9 0i 1uN.0 ' enN r: 0 '9 enuV0en.-4NNNN!.4!4V' E: -en 0-00 .44 .4.-40000000 D*nAO-000 0 0.04000 00040-4 88 -In CIS .. 44U2m C--04n To -I -U11 t- ,n .4 t- 'R .4 N t-twoRi1 X0 '-4 . 2.g , D ; a c 8 ~ NT k -11.D .C4 r4 10N 0 . N -4 r: 4 A 4 0 4 en 4m 4 N' 0 '0 4~ '0 ' C3 0 DC .CN4 .400O C 04 N \ (\I. eDtn <4en%4 N qr N 0% s.. 4. 8 84 -4~ -Z 0;ev r-. aI 4 tj 'r U\tdN IT(m U, if0 ? ' 2 CAS1YIE 4'. .I CJ C. -4 4).Ua(;V C;C644 'Ac; C C' 4') 0000004'I'0 O **0 * 0 * * C44* ,44 4 30.*''.040. '.4'.40m s".' C-06 NN lei.4M -4o 4-o 4 . ... 2ZL~ M. .4 CL 0 .4 0' N '0 '(' ' .4I .- 0" 04 .4i 0 (n -1 4 ~ '.N -T " .n~l '41 '-4 Nl 0 l 0I 0 0 %4-4 0 o I m 0' '.4 9 0-'4 '14 j. U40 '4O... 0! 0'I.1! U 9 I? C 1''.4.4O'.4-40'. i C~'.4'0 .! 1 C 1'.1 ''' & oi 0 '.4 Ego -:. .4 '.. 4 l 0 1 Y- ~ C 9I~ CL0 UiCLJttSMpED 04 J~ .4J ~ s . .'*~CJ~ . .4'. '~ to jL ~ 301\J100r .-4 04. /1~e oo .4 en4 ~ J 4 J- 0E1tC! r: , 1.0 0,0000,CC ... ~ C- 0r ~ ~ 0. - -4- 3.4p 1-4'0C- ?IC2 zS*--0 mJ~ C-05, ~. -4 OJ\ 0 2I ~C 011 '0 0, 01 m-0 0- V'J 0 0 .- C> C('( ~ . '. - N u\ 0% t- 1 mCoIC -, G"O<: Ps2 2 M , 1SC-' v~-d:; -4~~ -4M.- -4 .4 .. a .4..4 . 0' - - 3 .sIP-flI 0 \ n\ U?;CZJSSIFIED Z1 S'. 0 - D- 4o -7 LI 0 In 3 ln14-7 1t 114.10 ~!*HHO. 01 00 - (O 0000 0; rzc 0 0 V a, C~CO 0 00l 0 0 0 0 (n,4 N,- 0 14 ' 41 00000000-S H 4v. 0 H; 50. H S 9 000 H 10 0. 45 0, AY~ ~~ ' b. go H !I MCHSFE UNCLASSIFIED AIABAMA Army, Navy and Air Force 30 June 1958 Civilian Installation Total Military _Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ARMY Anniston Ordnance Depot 3,600 11 13 * 3,587 19 Ft. McClellan 4,842 14 3,853 28 989 5 Ft. Rucker 6,541 20 5,162 38 1,379 7 Mobile Engineer District 689 2 0 0 689 3 Redstone Arsenal 15,958 48 4,270 3] 11,688 60 Subtotal 31,63o 2 13,298 27 18,32 94 STATE TOTAL 33159 110-0 1 0 19,400 100 NAVY Barin Field Aux 1,626 86 1,521 86 105 100 Birmingham (Miscellaneous) 119 7 119 6 0 0 Subtotal 1745 2 1,640 92 105 100 STATE TOTAL IJ83 100 1778 100 105 100 AIR FORCE Brook".ey AFB (Depot) 15,324 56 1,269 13 14,055 79 Craig FB (Flying Training) 2,665 10 2,006 21 659 4 Gadsen AFS (Depot) 599 2 13 * 586 3 Gunter AFB (Air University) 1,484 5 1,100 1 384 2 Maxwell AFB (Air University Hqs) 6,877 25 4,975 51 1,902 ii Subtotal 2,4 98 2,363 96 17,586 22 STATE TOTAL 27,529 0 2l_9 10 17.L73 100 • Less than 0.5%. 5 u" L, a .. ! .J ARIZONA Army, Navy and Air Force 30 June 1958 Civilian installation Total Milit ay Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ARMY Ft. iHuachuca (Signal) 7,820 81 5,686 90 2,134 64 Navajc Ord Depot 558 6 13 * 545 16 Yuma Test Station 1,041 10 487 8 554 17 Subtotal 9,419 21 6,186 3,233 97 STATE TOTAL 2L 1o 6,326 l0 3 381 100 NAVY Litchfield Part NAF 1,144 96 510 91 634 100 STATE TOTAL 1194 100 560 Lo0 634 100 AIR FORCE Davis Monthan AFB (Medium Bomber) 7,482 39 6,484 42 998 28 Luke AFB (Combat Crew Training) 4,072 21 2,887 18 1,185 34 Williams AFB (Combat Crew Training) 3,798 20 2,757 18 1,041 29 Vincent AFB 2,799 15 2,614 17 185 5 Subtotal 18,151 2 14,742 25 3,409 96 STATE TOAL 19,063 100 20 00 3 100 Less than 0.5%. ,aOF$HIBAL . AXRKNSAS Army, Navy and Air Force 30 June 1958 Installation Total Military Civilian Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ARMY Army & Navy Hospital 306 2 159 2 147 4 Fort Chaffee (Training) 10,647 80 9,434 94 1,zi.5 36 Little Rock (Miscellaneous) 671 5 154 1 517 15 Midwest Chemical Depot 82 1 0 0 82 3 Pine Bluff Arsenal 1,207 9 169 2 1,038 30 Subtotal 1 21 9,916 22 g21 88 STATE TCTAL 13t 100 2,2L8 100 IM3 100 NAVY NAYSTATE TOTAL M 100 72 100 413 100 AIR FORCE Blytheville AFB (Heavy Bomber) 951 12 764 11 187 36 Little Rock AnB (Strategic Recon) 6,253 81 5,952 82 301 59 Subtotal 7,204 2 6,716 93 488 25 STATE TOAL 73_2 1O0 7 100 53 1O0 7 CALIFOR1IA Army 30 June 1958 Installation Total Military Civilian Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ARMY Alameda Administrative Center 391 1 10 * 381 2 Benicia Arsenal (Depot) 2,859 5 26 * 2,833 12 Lompoc Disciplinary Barracks 664 1 428 I 1 236 1 Camp Irwin 1,866 3 1,492 4 374 2 Camp Roberts (Inactive) 302 * 141 * 161 1 Camp San Luis Obispo (Inactive) 48 * 2 * 46 * Camp Stoneman 41 * 1 * 40 * Ft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2019 OUR BUILT ENVIRONMENTS for Our 2019 Annual Report, We’Ve Explored Various Structures That Sit on This Land
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 OUR BUILT ENVIRONMENTS For our 2019 Annual Report, we’ve explored various structures that sit on this land. Our buildings reflect the times in which they are created and the purposes they serve. The places where we live, dine, shop and gather are as much a part of our history as they are of our current lives. Some structures have evolved over more than a century while adhering to their original intent. 2 Highland Road, North Truro, now Salty Market, was built to be and is currently run as a neighborhood store. Houses built for whaling captains are now luxury inns and homes for those working in our vibrant art market. Others have experienced vast permutations. The Cahoon Hollow Life Saving Station became a hostelry before its life as the exceedingly popular Wellfleet Beachcomber. In 1852, the building at 90 Commercial Street, part of the Union Wharf Complex, served as the first offices for Seamen’s Bank. Now that historic building houses the law offices of Frederick V. Long. As always, our Annual Report is enhanced by narratives of those who have gone before us while celebrating the community we so appreciate and support today. “Its floorboards are wide. Its cedar shingles are made by hand. The nails are hand wrought. Among the underpinnings of the house are the masts of vessels. It has a round cellar of the kind known as ‘smuggler’s cellar,’ in the middle of which is a hook. This hook was there for the purpose of rigging a tackle to let down the barrel of Jamaican rum, which Provincetown captains smuggled from the West Indies.” — Mary Heaton Vorse, Time in the Town Untitled (the artist’s studio) Pauline Palmer courtesy Provincetown Art Association and Museum 466 COMMERCIAL STREET, PROVINCETOWN LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Perhaps no house better reflects the history of Mary Heaton Vorse was an internationally renowned Provincetown than the house at 466 Commercial Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context for Department of Defense Facilities World War Ii Permanent Construction
    DEPARTMeNT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES- WORLD WAR II PERMANENT CONSTRUhttp://aee-www.apgea.army.mil:8080/prod/usaee!eqlconserv/ww2pel.htm ~ - Delivery Order 21 Contract No. DACW31-89-D-0059 US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore District HISTORIC CONTEXT FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES WORLD WAR II PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION May 1997 R. Christopher Goodwin and Associates, Inc. 241 E. Fourth Street Suite 100 Frederick, Maryland 21701 FINAL REPORT June 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Historic Context for Department of Defense (DoD) World War H Permanent Construction combines two previous reports: Historic Context for Department of Defense Facilities World War H Permanent Construction (Hirrel et al., draft June 1994) and Methodology for World War H Permanent Construction (Whelan, draft August 1996). This project was designed to meet the following objectives: • To analyze and synthesize historical data on the military's permanent construction program during World War H. • To assist DoD cultural resource managers and other DoD personnel with fulfilling their responsibilities under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHP A) of 1966, as amended. Section 110 of the NHPA requires federal agencies to identity, evaluate, and nominate to the National Register of Historic Places historic properties under their jurisdiction. Section 110 Guidelines, developed by the National Park Service, U.S. Department ofthe Interior, direct federal agencies to establish historic contexts to identifY and evaluate historic properties (53FR 4727-46). • To develop a consistent historic context framework that provides comparative data and background information in a cost-effective manner, which will allow DoD personnel to assess the relative significance of World War II military construction.
    [Show full text]
  • US/US Territories Army
    DCN 3343 Operations & Training Facilities Area Department Owned US/US Territories Army - Active 18,590 Army - Guard 2,503 Army - Reserve 1,819 Navy - Active 10,320 Navy - Reserve 380 Air Force - Active 12,631 Air Force - Guard 2,799 Air Force - Reserve 626 Marine Corps - Active 2,110 Marine Corps - Reserve 12 DLA 235 TMA 117 WHS 22 Other 9,398 US/US Territories Total 61,562 Non-US Army - Active 4,017 Navy - Active 1,681 Air Force - Active 4,123 Marine Corps - Active 644 TMA 17 Other 557 Non-US Total 11,039 Operations & Training Total 72,601 DCN 3343 Maintenance & Production Facilities Area Department Owned US/US Territories Army - Active 11,154 Army - Guard 640 Army - Reserve 584 Navy - Active 4,389 Navy - Reserve 187 Air Force - Active 4,293 Air Force - Guard 1,125 Air Force - Reserve 169 Marine Corps - Active 868 Marine Corps - Reserve 3 DLA 81 TMA 38 Other 3,263 US/US Territories Total 26,794 Non-US Army - Active 1,161 Navy - Active 526 Air Force - Active 773 Marine Corps - Active 205 DoDEA 1 TMA 2 Other 41 Non-US Total 2,709 Maintenance & Production Total 29,503 DCN 3343 Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Facilities Area Department Owned US/US Territories Army - Active 2,813 Army - Guard 3 Army - Reserve 12 Navy - Active 2,655 Air Force - Active 1,556 Marine Corps - Active 30 TMA 44 Other 1,191 US/US Territories Total 8,304 Non-US Army - Active 133 Navy - Active 35 Air Force - Active 38 TMA 8 Other 27 Non-US Total 241 Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Total 8,545 DCN 3343 Supply Facilities Area Department Owned
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining the Old Coast
    IMAGINING THE OLD COAST: HISTORY, HERITAGE, AND TOURISM IN NEW ENGLAND, 1865-2012 BY JONATHAN MORIN OLLY B.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST, 2002 A.M., BROWN UNIVERSITY, 2008 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF AMERICAN STUDIES AT BROWN UNIVERSITY PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MAY 2013 © 2013 by Jonathan Morin Olly This dissertation by Jonathan Morin Olly is accepted in its present form by the Department of American Studies as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date: _______________ ________________________________ Steven D. Lubar, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date: _______________ ________________________________ Patrick M. Malone, Reader Date: _______________ ________________________________ Elliott J. Gorn, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date: _______________ ________________________________ Peter M. Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Jonathan Morin Olly was born in Fitchburg, Massachusetts, on April 17, 1980. He received his B.A. in History at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 2002, and his A.M. in Public Humanities at Brown University in 2008. He has interned for the National Museum of American History, the New Bedford Whaling Museum, the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum, and the Penobscot Marine Museum. He has also worked in the curatorial departments of the Norman Rockwell Museum and the National Heritage Museum. While at Brown he served as a student curator at the Haffenreffer Museum of Anthropology, and taught a course in the Department of American Studies on the history, culture, and environmental impact of catching and eating seafood in New England.
    [Show full text]
  • Update Report for Massachusetts
    Update Report for Massachusetts Current as of 696 Virginia Road, Concord, Massachusetts 01742-2751 July 31, 2020 Public Affairs Office, 978-318-8264 Home Page: www.nae.usace.army.mil Mission Index The missions of the New England District (District), of the U.S. Army Corps of • Base Realignment and Engineers (Corps) include flood risk management protection, emergency Closure preparedness and response to natural disasters and national emergencies, • Coastal Storm Damage Reduction environmental remediation and restoration, natural resource management, • Defense Environmental streambank and shoreline protection, navigation maintenance and Restoration Program (DERP) improvement, support to military facilities and installations, and engineering • Ecological Restoration and construction support to other government agencies. The six New England • Flood Damage Reduction states cover 66,000 square miles, with 6,100 miles of coastline, 170 federal • Flood Plain Management navigation projects (13 deep draft commercial waterways), 13 major river • Flood Risk Management basins, and thousands of miles of navigable rivers and streams. The District • Interagency and International operates and maintains 31 dams, three hurricane barriers and the Cape Cod Support Canal. Through its Regulatory program, it processes nearly 2,500 applications • Mission per year for work in waters and wetlands of the six-state region. We employ • Natural Resource Management about 500 professional civilian employees, with about 300 stationed at our • Navigation • Planning Assistance to States headquarters in Concord, Massachusetts. Other Corps of Engineers • Regulatory Program employees serve at Corps projects and offices throughout the region. For • Shoreline/Streambank information on the District please visit the website at: www.nae.usace.army.mil; Protection on Twitter at: twitter.com/corpsnewengland or on Facebook at: • Silver Jacket Program facebook.com/CorpsNewEngland.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Unit 1D East Point, Nahant, Massachusetts, in World War Two 1942-1945
    August 2012 The Coast Defense Journal Page 1 Naval Unit 1D East Point, Nahant, Massachusetts, in World War Two 1942-1945 Gerald W. Butler In 1940, before the United States entered World War II, modern, fixed underwater defenses were planned for Boston Harbor, under the code name “Plan 04 - Rainbow.” The only active underwater- detection device then readily available was the magnetic indicator loop. In July 1941, the chief of naval operations recommended loops be established in strategic New England harbors. Boston Harbor was to receive four magnetic loops, 14 sono-radio buoys, and 10 army hydrophones. The loops and sono-radio buoys were to be equally divided between two shore installations on either side of the harbor entrance - Nahant or Marblehead for the northern station and Point Allerton, Hull, or North Scituate for the southern station. By October, East Point, Nahant; and Strawberry Point in North Scituate had been selected. Professor Alexander Crichton Mitchell, a physicist and director of the Eskdalemuir Magnetical Observatory in Scotland, initially researched magnetic indicator loops in 1914. The magnetic indica- tor loop consisted of armored cables forming a large loop on the seabed, connected to a shore station equipped with precise electronic recording devices. The loop detected any distortions in the earth’s magnetic field caused by a metal body passing over it. Chart paper at the shore station recorded the signature of a passing vessel, making a visual record while sounding an audible alarm. The first war- time use of the indicator loop, on October 28, 1918, at Scapa Flow, resulted in the sinking of German submarine UB-116 after she crossed a seabed loop into a remotely controlled mine field.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Harbor Islands Comprehensive Plan
    Boston Harbor Islands Comprehensive Plan V l^Oibk D lf\ c ' x 035//& 299- Boston Harbor Islands Comprehensive Plan prepared for Massachusetts Department of Natural Resources by mapc Metropolitan Area Planning Council The preparation of this report was financially aided through a federal grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund program of the Depart­ ment of Interior, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Project #25-00065. October 1972 For all those who have ever sailed, are sailors at heart or have dreamed of the days when sailing ships plied the waters of Boston Harbor, we would like to identify our Harbor Islands’ Logo. Our experts tell us that this particular vessel was known as a four masted, double topsail bark or four masted bark with double topsail. A tendency in this country to use the term ship or "shipentine" never quite caught on and the term remained bark or barque as it was known in England. Cover Photograph: City of Boston Skyline as seen from Outer Brewster Island. Elissa M. Landre, MAPC Staff. Metropol i tan Area Planning Council 4 4 School Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Richard M. Doherty (6 1 7 ) 523 - 2454 Executive Director Commissioner Arthur W. Brownell Department of Natural Resources 100 Cambridge Street Boston, Massachusetts 02202 Dear Commissioner Brownell: On behalf of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, I am pleased to transmit the “Boston Harbor Islands Comprehensive Plan,” which has been prepared by the Planning Council under contract to the Massachusetts Department of Natural Resources in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 742 of the Acts of the Massachu­ setts General Court, 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Evaluation of U.S
    U.S. ARMY COLD WAR ERA MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES THEMATIC STUDY AND GUIDELINES: IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF U.S. ARMY COLD WAR ERA MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES U.S. Army Environmental Center Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21020-5401 1 U.S. ARMY COLD WAR ERA MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document provides a national historic context for the U.S. Army’s military-industrial involvement in the Cold War (1946-1989). The goal of the project was two-fold: (1) to develop a thematic study on historic properties associated specifically with the military-industrial theme of the Cold War and (2) to provide guidelines for the identification and evaluation of Cold War era military-industrial historic properties in the Army. The document emphasizes the specific relevance of the Cold War to the Army’s military- industrial history, rather than the general context of the Army during the Cold War period. In other words, although there is some discussion of the Army’s traditional mission, the focus of this historic context is on what the Army did in direct response to the Cold War. For the purposes of this study, the Cold War is defined primarily as the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union and is only secondarily defined as the general threat of communist aggression from other sources, such as China. The document is organized into seven chapters. Chapters 1, 2, and 3 provide an introduction and discuss the goals and methodology, respectively. Chapter 4.0, the Historical Narrative, provides an overview of the Army’s Cold War role.
    [Show full text]
  • CACO Atwood-Higgins Historic District CLI Parkreport.Pdf
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2010 Atwood-Higgins Historic District Cape Cod National Seashore Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Atwood-Higgins Historic District Cape Cod National Seashore Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Military Reservations and Concrete Gun Batteries 1890-1950
    Reference Guide 201 MODERN AMERICAN SEACOAST DEFENSES A LIST OF MILITARY RESERVATIONS AND CONCRETE GUN BATTERIES 1890-1950 Compiled by Mark A. Berhow © 2021, Mark Berhow Revision Date: February 27, 2021 Fort Michie (Great Gull Island, NY) Once part of the Harbor Defenses of Long Island Sound, NY, the island is now a national wildlife refuge. The large concrete structure in the forground is Battery J.M.K. Davis, built for a single 16-inch gun on a disappearing carriage. Photograph by Terry McGovern, 2003. 202 American Seacoast Defenses AMERICAN SEACOAST DEFENSES A LIST OF MILITARY RESERVATIONS AND CONCRETE GUN BATTERIES 1890-1945 This is an attempt to list all the concrete emplacements built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to hold seacoast armament of the “Modern era” (1890-1950). It includes four major generations of American coast defense construction—the Early Modern Program batteries (the “Endicott Board” and the “Taft Board”), the post-World War I batteries, and the WW II Modernization Program batteries—as well as those batteries built during emergency situations. Every effort has been made to make this list as accurate as possible, but it will most likely contain a number of errors and omissions. The author would greatly appreciate being contacted about any corrections. Fort and battery names used in this list are those perceived by the author as being the last official designation. Named batteries are listed by surname only, even though as many were designated by the full name of the person they were named after. See Designating US Seacoast Fortifications, War Department General Orders and Letters from the Adjutant General 1809-1950, compiled by Matthew Adams (privately published by the compiler, Australia, 2000) for more information on fort and battery names.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Edward Rowe Snow Collection #1352
    The Inventory of the Edward Rowe Snow Collection #1352 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center SNOW, EDWARDROWE Gift ·of June, 1969 I. Manuscripts Box 1 A) LEGENDS, MAPS AND STORIES OF BOSTON AND NEW ENGLAND. 1965. George Prescott. 1) Typescript with holo. corrections, 149 pp. (#1) 2) Page proofs (incomplete) with 37 photographs. (l.iz) 3) Research materials . ; (/13) a) Reproduction of 18th Century map of Boston harbor. b) Typescript notes, 18 pp. c) Holograph notes,, 30 pp. Boxes 1 ,2 B) FANTASTIC FOLKLORE AND FACT. (196~ 1) Typescript with many holo. corrections including several ~x, J,ox;)... drafts of some sections, 863 pp. Cit -'t5jl '1) (-t '>~.)a) Boxes) 1,'.3 C) INCREDIBLE MYSTERIES AND LEGENDS OF THE SEA. Dodd, 196 7. 1) Typescript with many holo. corrections including several 'Box ~ t;o,c 3 drafts of some sections, 965 PP. (ir .tf.J 5; (o) Ct--c a ) Box 3 D) TALES OF SEA AND SHORE. Dodd, 1966. 1) Typescript with many holo.· corrections, including several drafts of some sections, 263 pp. (//3, #4) II~ ·cotresportdence- 1933-1965. Almost all correspondence with readeis of his boo8 Box 4 A) 1933-1944 (III) 8 TLS 20 ALS b) 1945 ,UFZ) 5 TLS 21 ALS ( page 2 SNOW, EDWARD ROWE Gift of June 1969 Box, i/4 C) 1946 (112) 4 TLS 18 ALS D) 1947 (//3) 23 TL'S 35 ALS E) 1948 (t/4) 5 TLS 6 ALS F) 1949 (t/4) 7 TLS 3 ALS ; G) 1950 ,(t/4) 7 TLS 3 ALS H) 1951 (1~5) 12 TLS 16 ALS I) 1952 I •(//5) 34 TLS (11 CTL replies on reverse side) 23 CTL J) 1953 .
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan, Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts
    CACÒ rù b 2-C 2_- CUòi » &</o(0<?o ¿>0?/ò'7334 m aster plan CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE / MASSACHUSETTS recommended JOHN W. BRIGHT / CHIEF, OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND DESIGN / 2-18-70 LESLIE P. ARNBERGER / SUPERINTENDENT / 4-7-70 approved HENRY G. SCHMIDT / REGIONAL DIRECTOR / 10-7-70 Master Plan National Seashore • Massachusetts SU M M AR Y 1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES 5 REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ANALYSIS 9 • ACCESS AND CIRCULATION 9 • POPULATION DATA 10 • REGIONAL POPULATION TRENDS 10 • PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 11 • SURROUNDINGS AND EXISTING USE 11 • REGIONAL ANALYSIS 12 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION 15 FACTORS AFFECTING RESOURCES AND USE 25 • LEGAL FACTORS 2 5 • CLIMATE 27 •FIRE HISTORY 27 • LAND STATUS 2 8 VISITOR USE OF RESOURCES 31 Table Of Contents THE PLAN 35 • INTRODUCTION 35 •USE CAPACITY 36 • ACCESS AND CIRCULATION 36 • PUBLIC CONTACT, INFORMATION AND FEES 39 • RECREATION 41 • INTERPRETATION 4 5 • ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 4 6 • RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND VISITOR PROTECTION 47 • OFF-SEASON USE 50 • LAND ACQUISITION 51 • COORDINATED PLANNING 52 • MAINTENANCE 53 • HISTORIC STRUCTURES 5 4 • HIGHLAND LIGHT COMPLEX 56 • NAUSET LIGHT BEACH 56 • BAY SIDE 57 PRIORITY OF NEEDS 59 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 61 Summary The Master Plan for preservation and use com plem ent those provided elsewhere. of Cape Cod National Seashore was prepared Seashore resources provide an exceptional in 1962, and approved in 1963, after review base for such outdoor pursuits as swimming, and recommendation by the Advisory fishing, surfing, hiking, and biking; for nature Commission. This is a second edition of the and history study; and for cultivating an 1963 plan, in a new format and with such awareness of man's relationship with his revisions as five years of experience in environment.
    [Show full text]