DOCSLIB.ORG

The Prolegomenon to Proclus' Platonic Theology. an Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Prolegomenon to Proclus' Platonic Theology. an Introduction The Prolegomenon to Proclus’ Platonic Theology An Introduction, Translation, and Commentary of Chapters 1-7 of Book I of the Platonic Theology Thèse Simon Fortier Doctorat en Philosophie Philosophiae Doctor (Ph.D.) Québec, Canada © Simon Fortier, 2014 Résumé Bien qu‘elle représente son opus magnum, la Théologie platonicienne de Proclus a souvent été négligée par les études néoplatoniciennes récentes. Hormis l‘importante édition et traduction de cette œuvre dans la Collection des Universités de France (Proclus, Théologie platonicienne, 6 vol., éd. H. D. Saffrey et L. G. Westerink, Paris, 1968-1997), et le Festschrift qui l‘a célébrée par la suite (Proclus et la théologie platonicienne, Actes du Colloque International de Louvain [13-16 mai 1998], en l'honneur de H. D. Saffrey et L. G. Westerink (†), éd. A. Ph. Segonds (†) et C. Steel,, Leuven/Paris, 2000), peu de travaux ont été consacrés à la Théologie platonicienne. Le signe le plus révélateur de ce manque criant est sans aucun doute l‘absence d‘une traduction anglaise digne de foi et d‘un commentaire détaillé de cette œuvre, pourtant capitale, de la tradition philosophique occidentale. La présente traduction anglaise des premiers chapitres des prolégomènes de la Théologie platonicienne (chap. 1-7), accompagnée d‘une introduction, d‘un essai interprétatif et d‘un commentaire détaillé, cherche en partie à combler cette lacune, espérant aussi stimuler par-là l‘intérêt pour ce dernier grand monument de la philosophie antique tardive. iii Abstract Despite being his magnum opus, Proclus‘ Platonic Theology has been largely overlooked by the contemporary revival of Neoplatonic scholarship. Aside the publication of H. D. Saffrey and L. G. Westerink‘s edition in the Collection des Universités de France (Proclus, Théologie platonicienne, 6 vol., éd. H. D. Saffrey et L. G. Westerink, Paris, 1968-1997), and a Festschrift dedicated thereto (Proclus et la théologie platonicienne, Actes du Colloque International de Louvain [13-16 mai 1998], en l'honneur de H. D. Saffrey et L. G. Westerink (†), éd. A. Ph. Segonds (†) et C. Steel, Leuven/Paris, 2000), scant work has been done on the Platonic Theology. Perhaps the most telling signs of the neglect from which it has suffered are its lack of at once a reliable English translation and detailed commentary. The present English translation of the opening chapters of the prolegomenon of the Platonic Theology (chap. 1-7), with its accompanying introduction, interpretative essay, and running commentary, is therefore an attempt to give this work some of the attention it so richly deserves. v CONTENTS RÉSUMÉ .................................................................................................................................... III ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. V ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................... IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ XV INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Proclus‟ Plato .........................................................................................................................1 The TP: Its Purpose and Structure .........................................................................................7 The Prolegomenon ................................................................................................................ 15 The Text, the Translations, and the Present Work ................................................................ 17 PLATO‘S THEOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 23 I. On Methodology ................................................................................................................ 24 I.1) Open Discourse I: The Dialectical Method .......................................................................... 26 I.2) Open Discourse II: The Entheastic Method .......................................................................... 31 I.3) Allusion I: The Imagistic Method .......................................................................................... 34 I.4) Allusion II: The Symbolic Method......................................................................................... 41 II. The Parmenides ................................................................................................................ 47 II.1) The Logical Interpretation ................................................................................................... 49 II.2) The Metaphysical Interpretation ......................................................................................... 52 II.2.1) The Ontological Interpretation ......................................................................................... 53 II.2.2) A Blueprint of Reality ....................................................................................................... 58 III. Henology/Agathology ...................................................................................................... 59 III.1) Henology ............................................................................................................................ 63 III.2) Agathology .......................................................................................................................... 76 III.3) The Yawning Gulf ............................................................................................................... 79 IV. Henadology ..................................................................................................................... 80 IV.1) The Participated One .......................................................................................................... 81 IV.2) The Religious Aspect .......................................................................................................... 84 V. The Order of the Gods ..................................................................................................... 88 V.1) Being: The Intelligible Gods ................................................................................................ 91 V.3) Life: The Intelligible-Intellective Gods ................................................................................ 98 V.4) Intellect: The Intellective Gods .......................................................................................... 103 V.5) Soul: The Hypercosmic and Hypercosmic-Encosmic Gods ............................................... 107 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 111 TEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 113 TEXTUAL EMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 131 TRANSLATION ........................................................................................................................ 133 Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................ 133 Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................................ 135 Chapter 3 ............................................................................................................................ 138 Chapter 4 ............................................................................................................................ 142 Chapter 5 ............................................................................................................................ 146 vii Chapter 6 ............................................................................................................................ 148 Chapter 7 ............................................................................................................................ 151 COMMENTARY ....................................................................................................................... 153 Commentary on chapter 1 .................................................................................................. 153 Commentary on chapter 2 .................................................................................................. 169 Commentary on chapter 3 .................................................................................................. 175 Commentary on chapter 4 .................................................................................................. 191 Commentary on chapter 5 .................................................................................................. 202 Commentary on chapter 6 .................................................................................................. 211 Commentary on chapter 7 .................................................................................................. 218 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................... 223 viii ABBREVIATIONS General: TP = Proclus,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Žižek and Lacanian Henology—With a “Silent Partner”
    ISSN 1751-8229 Volume Twelve, Number Two Žižek and Lacanian Henology—With a “Silent Partner” Kenji Nobutomo, Kagoshima University, Japan Abstract This article aims to clarify the meaning of henology for Lacan and Žižek. Žižek apparently rejects Neoplatonic way of thinking, but by considering Lacanian Henology through its origin, Etienne Gilson, Lacanian henology and Žižek’s Hegelian reading of the One become converged. Both of them think the movement of the One from one principle and its two aspects. The principle is that the One gives something that it does not have, and it corresponds to Lacanian definition of love. Regarding its two aspects, the first one is the logical necessity that generates necessarily the One, and the second is the logical contingency that generates contingently the surplus element. By this, we can clarify the theoretical development of each period of Lacan. In early Lacan, henology was a logic that ties his “the Symbolic” and Freudian Death drive. In middle Lacan, his main concern was the mathematical logic as the logic of the Id, and henology became the generative logic of the subject of enunciation or the subject of the jouissance. But at the same time, this movement produces as a co-product a inassimilable remainder, “object a” with the subject of signifiant. In late Lacan, by virtue of the “necessary” movement of the One and its “contingent” co-product, the universe of the discourse became indeterminate, undecidable, “not-all,” which means for Lacan “the contingent.” This characteristic became the logic of Lacanian “sexuation.” 1. Introduction: What is Henology? In a session in 1971, Jacques Lacan used the term hénologie to describe his “analytic discourse” and its relation to the classical philosophical notion of “the One.” The annoying thing, is that when you proceed, as I have just said in this writing, that it is a matter of proceeding, namely, to envisage from a discourse what plays the function of the One in it, what do I do from time to time? If you will allow me this neologism what I do is “Henology”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology of Consciousness
    Ontology of Consciousness Percipient Action edited by Helmut Wautischer A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or me- chanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] or write to Special Sales Depart- ment, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong, and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ontology of consciousness : percipient action / edited by Helmut Wautischer. p. cm. ‘‘A Bradford book.’’ Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-23259-3 (hardcover : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-262-73184-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Consciousness. 2. Philosophical anthropology. 3. Culture—Philosophy. 4. Neuropsychology— Philosophy. 5. Mind and body. I. Wautischer, Helmut. B105.C477O58 2008 126—dc22 2006033823 10987654321 Index Abaluya culture (Kenya), 519 as limitation of Turing machines, 362 Abba Macarius of Egypt, 166 as opportunity, 365, 371 Abhidharma in dualism, person as extension of matter, as guides to Buddhist thought and practice, 167, 454 10–13, 58 in focus of attention, 336 basic content, 58 in measurement of intervals, 315 in Asanga’s ‘‘Compendium of Abhidharma’’ in regrouping of elements, 335, 344 (Abhidharma-samuccaya), 67 in technical causality, 169, 177 in Maudgalyayana’s ‘‘On the Origin of shamanic separation from body, 145 Designations’’ Prajnapti–sastra,73 Action, 252–268.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*
    1 Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow* Raphaël Millière École normale supérieure, Paris – October 2011 Translated by Mark Ohm with the assistance of Leah Orth, Jon Cogburn, and Emily Beck Cogburn “By metaphysics, I do not mean those abstract considerations of certain imaginary properties, the principal use of which is to furnish the wherewithal for endless dispute to those who want to dispute. By this science I mean the general truths which can serve as principles for the particular sciences.” Malebranche Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion 1. The interminable agony of metaphysics Throughout the twentieth century, numerous philosophers sounded the death knell of metaphysics. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rudolf Carnap, Martin Heidegger, Gilbert Ryle, J. L. Austin, Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, and, henceforth, Hilary Putnam: a great many tutelary figures have extolled the rejection, the exceeding, the elimination, or the deconstruction of first philosophy. All these necrological chronicles do not have the same radiance, the same seriousness, nor the same motivations, but they all agree to dismiss the discipline, which in the past was considered “the queen of the sciences”, with a violence at times comparable to the prestige it commanded at the time of its impunity. Even today, certain philosophers hastily spread the tragic news with contempt for philosophical inquiry, as if its grave solemnity bestowed upon it some obviousness. Thus, Franco Volpi writes: ‘Grand metaphysics is dead!’ is the slogan which applies to the majority of contemporary philosophers, whether continentals or of analytic profession. They all treat metaphysics as a dead dog.1 In this way, the “path of modern thought” would declare itself vociferously “anti- metaphysical and finally post-metaphysical”.
    [Show full text]
  • Influencia De La Nocion De Libertad De Gregorio Niiseno Sobre La Filosofía Del Siglo XV En Italia a Través De La Recepción De
    Influencia de la nocion de libertad de Gregorio Niiseno sobre la filosofía del siglo XV en Italia a través de la recepción de sus textos Bastitta Harriet, Francisco D'Amico, Claudia F. 2015 Tesis presentada con el fin de cumplimentar con los requisitos finales para la obtención del título Doctor de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad de Buenos Aires en Filosofía UIVERSIDAD DE BUEOS AIRES Facultad de Filosofía y Letras TESIS DE DOCTORADO Título : “Influencia de la noción de libertad de Gregorio Niseno sobre la filosofía del siglo XV en Italia a través de la recepción de sus textos” Directora : Dra. Claudia D'Amico Co-Director : Dr. Pablo Cavallero Doctorando: Lic. Francisco Bastitta Harriet ° de Exp.: 0843448/2008 Buenos Aires, noviembre de 2015 IDICE GEERAL ITRODUCCIÓ ..................................................................................................................... 3 Sección I - La concepción de la libertad de Gregorio de isa y su suerte medieval en Occidente CAP. 1) LA TEORÍA GREGORIAA DE LA LIBERTAD PERSOAL 24 1.1. El puesto del hombre en el cosmos ....................................................................................... 25 1.2. La imagen de Dios en el hombre como libertad. Su carácter cuasi divino .......................... 41 1.3. La nueva noción de hipóstasis aplicada a Dios y a los hombres .......................................... 49 1.4. Hacia un sentido ‘personal’ y creativo de la decisión y el albedrío ..................................... 58 1.5. Autoridad y decisión más allá de la necesidad y del orden causal ....................................... 73 CAP. 2) PRESECIA DE LA TEORÍA DE LA LIBERTAD DEL ISEO E LOS AUTORES MEDIEVALES....................................................................................................... 92 2.1. Las dos primeras traducciones latinas del De opificio hominis ........................................... 93 2.2. La teoría de la libertad del iseno en los autores medievales bizantinos ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Marie-Luise Lakmann, Platonici Minores: 1
    MARIE-LUISE LAKMANN, Platonici minores: 1. Jh.v.Chr. - 2. Jh.n.Chr. Prosopographie. Fragmente und Testimonien mit deutscher Überset- zung. Philosophia antiqua, 145, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2017, xi+824 pp., $236.00, ISBN 978-90-04-31533-4. This is indeed a mighty work, an offshoot of a yet mightier one, the great project ‘Der Platonismus in der Antike’, initiated many years ago by Heinrich Dórrie, and continued, first by Matthias Baltes, and, most recently, by Christian Pietsch, who is currently bringing it at last to its conclusion with the eighth volume. What Professor Lakmann, who has been closely connected with this project, has set herself to do here is to make the fullest possible collection of minor figures involved in Platonist philosophizing over the period conventionally regarded as ‘Middle Platonic’, in order to give some attention to the persons behind the doctrines. To this end, she has assembled data on some 88 individuals, including four Anonymi, and some very obscure figures indeed. The work is divided into two main sections: ‘Prosopographie’, in which she sets out and discusses what is known about the lives and doctrines of the figures concerned, and ‘Texte und Ubersetzungen’, in which the relevant fragments and testimonia are presented and translated (the translations being undertaken by Erhard Pahnke and Henner Thoss). The only inadequacy I find with this arrangemnt is that there is no provision for discussing the contexts of the individual passages quoted, and the details of doctrine involved, as would sometimes be desirable – but one hesitates to suggest anything that would make a book of 835 pages even longer! She has, quite reasonably, chosen to exclude major figures, such as Antiochus of Ascalon, Eudorus, Plutarch, Atticus, Apuleius, Albinus, or Numenius, who either have major works surviving (as in the case of Plutarch, Apuleius or Albinus), or who have had their fragments adequately collected (though she does include here L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ois Laruelle
    Frans;ois Laruelle --- and collaborators --- Dictio nary of Non-Philosophy -- translated by Taylor Adkins I Univocal -- Fran\:ois Laruelle ------ and collaborators -----­ To ny Brachet. Gilbert Kieffer, Laurent Leroy, Da niel Nicolet, Anne-Fran�oise Schmid, Serge Valdinoci Dictio nary of Non-Philosophy translated by Taylor Adkins I Univocal ---- DJCT!ONNAIREDE LA NON-PHILOSOPH!Eby Fran�ois Laruelle ©Editions Kime, 1998 Translated by Taylor Adkins as Dictionary ofNon-Philosophy First Edition Minneapolis©2013, Univocal Publishing Published by Univocal 123 North 3rd Street, #202 Minneapolis, MN 55401 No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including phorocopying, recording or any other information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Thanks to John David Ebert and Ben Woodard Designed & Printed by Jason Wagner Distributed by the University of Minnesota Press ISBN 9781937561130 Library of Congress Control Number 2013939530 TA BLE OF CONTENTS Translator's Introduction .......................................... .....................9 Preface to the English Language Edition...................... ................. 15 Preface .........................................................................................19 Theory of the Non-Philosophical Dictionary....................... .......23 Auto-position .......................... .....................................................39 Being-in-One (Being-according-to-the-One)...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 11 2011 Parrhesia Number 11 • 2011 • 1-34
    PARRHESIA WWW.PARRHESIAJOURNAL.ORG ISSUE 11 2011 PARRHESIA NUMBER 11 • 2011 • 1-34 THE WORK AND THE IDEA Miguel de Beistegui Editorial Note. The text presented here is the first chapter of an upcoming book by the author. The editorial board would like to thank Professor de Beistegui for allowing us to publish it here; our thanks also go to Robert Sinnerbrink for facilitating its publication. INTRODUCTION This book attempts to show that it is through the recognition of what I call the hypersensible, and the work of metaphor, that art comes into its own, and is able to twist free of metaphysical aesthetics, rooted in the ontology of identity and governed by the laws of imitation. By “hypersensible” I mean a dimension that escapes the classical distinction and the space that stretches between the sensible and the supersensible, matter and form, or the image and the original. In a nutshell, the hypersensible designates the excess of the sensible within the sensible, and the genuine matter of art. As such, it escapes any straightforward materialism, as well as any form of idealism, or spiritualism. It could be characterised as hyletics. For reasons that I will clarify later on, I prefer to refer to it as an aesthetics of metaphor, or a metaphoric. Why metaphor? Simply because, twisting free of its own, deeply entrenched metaphysical interpretation, metaphor can be seen as the image or trope, applicable to art in general, which reveals the excess of the sensible in the sensible, or the way in which any given image is virtually more than it actually is.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Is Double
    Being is double Jean-Luc Marion and John Milbank on God, being and analogy Nathan Edward Lyons B. A. (Adv.) (Hons.) This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Philosophy Australian Catholic University Graduate Research Office Locked Bag 4115 Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 1st March 2014 i ABSTRACT This thesis examines the contemporary dispute between philosopher Jean-Luc Marion and theologian John Milbank concerning the relation of God to being and the nature of theological analogy. I argue that Marion and Milbank begin from a shared opposition to Scotist univocity but tend in opposite directions in elaborating their constructive theologies. Marion takes an essentially Dionysian approach, emphasising the divine transcendence “beyond being” to such a degree as to produce an essentially equivocal account of theological analogy. Milbank, on the other hand, inspired particularly by Eckhart, affirms a strong version of the Thomist thesis that God is “being itself” and emphasises divine immanence to such a degree that the analogical distinction between created and uncreated being is virtually collapsed. Both thinkers claim fidelity to the premodern Christian theological tradition, but I show that certain difficulties attend both of their claims. I suggest that the decisive issue between them is the authority which should be granted to Heidegger’s account of being and I argue that it is Milbank’s vision of post-Heideggerian theological method which is to be preferred. I conclude that Marion and Milbank give two impressive contemporary answers to the ancient riddle of “double being” raised in the Anonymous Commentary on Plato’s “Parmenides,” a riddle which queries the relation between absolute First being and derived Second being.
    [Show full text]
  • The Renaissance, and the Rediscovery of Plato and the Greeks
    Click here for Full Issue of Fidelio Volume 12, Number 3, Fall 2003 The Renaissance, and The Rediscovery of Plato And the G by Torbjörn Jerlerup t was in the Midland between the ‘ famous rivers Po and Ticino and IAdda and others, whence some say our Milan derives its name, on the ninth day of October, in the year of this last age of the world the 1360th.”1 For the people who lived in the Italian city of Milan or in one of its surrounding villages, it might have looked like an ordinary, but cold, autumn morning. It was Friday. The city council and the bishop of Milan were probably quarrelling about the construction of a new cathedral in the city. The construction would not start for another 25 years. The university professors and the barbers (the doctors Alinari/Art Resource, NY of the time), were probably worried Domenico di Michelino, “Dante Alighieri Reading His Poem,” 1465 about rumors of a new plague, the (detail). The Cathedral of Florence, topped by Brunelleschi’s Dome, third since the Great Plague in 1348, appears to Dante’s left. and the townspeople were probably complaining about taxes, as usual. The Great minds of ancient Greece farmers, who led their cattle to pas- (clockwise from top): Homer, Plato, ture, were surely complaining about Solon, Aeschylus, Sophocles. the weather, as it had been unusually unstable. 36 © 2003 Schiller Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission strictly prohibited. The Granger Collection of Plato EIRNS/Philip Ulanowsky Greeks The Granger Collection If they were not too busy with their cows, they perhaps caught a glimpse of a monk riding along the grassy, mud-ridden path that was part of the main road between the cities of Florence and The Granger Collection Milan.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Parmenides and Its Heritage. Volume 1
    PLATO’S PARMENIDES AND ITS HERITAGE VOLUME 1 PLATO’S PARMENIDES AND its heritage VOLUME 1: History and Interpretation from the Old Academy to Later Platonism and Gnosticism Writings from the Greco-Roman World Supplement Series Edited by John T. Fitzgerald Series Editor John D. Turner and Kevin Corrigan Number 2 Society of Biblical Literature PLATO’S PARMENIDES AND ITS HERITAGE, VOLUME 1 Atlanta PLATO’S PARMENIDES AND its heritage VOLUME 1: History and Interpretation from the Old Academy to Later Platonism and Gnosticism Edited by John D. Turner and Kevin Corrigan Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta Contents Abbreviations vii Introduction 1 Section 1: Plato, from the Old Academy to Middle Platonism 1. The Place of the Parmenides in Plato’s Thought and in the Subsequent Tradition 23 Kevin Corrigan 2. Speusippus’s Neutral Conception of the One and Plato’s Parmenides 37 Gerald Bechtle 3. The Fragment of Speusippus in Column I of the Anonymous Commentary on the Parmenides 59 Luc Brisson 4. Speusippus and the Ontological Interpretation of the Parmenides 67 John Dillon 5. The Indefinite Dyad in Sextus Empiricus’s Report (Adversus Mathathematicos 10.248–283) and Plato’s Parmenides 79 Thomas Szlezák 6. Plato and Parmenides in Agreement: Ammonius’s Praise of God as One-Being in Plutarch’s The E At Delphi 93 Zlatko Pleše 7. Moderatus, E. R. Dodds, and the Development of Neoplatonist Emanation 115 J. Noel Hubler Section 2: Middle Platonic and Gnostic Texts 8. The Platonizing Sethian Treatises, Marius Victorinus’s Philosophical Sources, and Pre-Plotinian Parmenides Commentaries 131 John D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Relativism.Indb
    Richard Schantz, Markus Seidel The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge P h i l o s o p h i s c h e A n a l y s e P h i l o s o p h i c a l A n a l y s i s Herausgegeben von / Edited by Herbert Hochberg • Rafael Hüntelmann • Christian Kanzian Richard Schantz • Erwin Tegtmeier Band 43 / Volume 43 Richard Schantz, Markus Seidel The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. North and South America by Transaction Books Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08854-8042 [email protected] United Kingdom, Ireland, Iceland, Turkey, Malta, Portugal by Gazelle Books Services Limited White Cross Mills Hightown LANCASTER, LA1 4XS [email protected] Livraison pour la France et la Belgique: Librairie Philosophique J.Vrin 6, place de la Sorbonne; F-75005 PARIS Tel. +33 (0)1 43 54 03 47; Fax +33 (0)1 43 54 48 18 www.vrin.fr 2011 ontos verlag P.O. Box 15 41, D-63133 Heusenstamm www.ontosverlag.com ISBN 978-3-86838-126-9 2011 No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed
    [Show full text]
  • GALILEO CREATION and COSMOGONY a Study on the Interplay Between Galileo’S Science of Motion and the Creation Theme [M-STO/05, M-FIL/06]
    DOCTORAL DISSERTATION GALILEO CREATION AND COSMOGONY A Study on the Interplay between Galileo’s Science of Motion and the Creation Theme [M-STO/05, M-FIL/06] Ph.D. Candidate Ph.D. Coordinator IVAN MALARA Prof. ANDREA PINOTTI Registration number: R11933 JOINT PH.D. SUPERVISORS Università degli Studi di Milano Prof. LUCA BIANCHI Doctoral course in Philosophy and Human Sciences – XXXIII Cycle Prof. ELIO NENCI (Dipartimento di Filosofia “Piero Martinetti”) Gent Universiteit Prof. MAARTEN VAN DYCK Academic Year 2019/2020 È chiaro che il pensiero dà fastidio anche se chi pensa è muto come un pesce anzi è un pesce e come pesce è difficile da bloccare perché lo protegge il mare Com’è profondo il mare LUCIO DALLA, Com’è profondo il mare (1977) Non ’mbrischiare a calia ca ’nzudda (Calabrian saying) Table of contents Abstract English .........................................................................................................VII Italian ..........................................................................................................VIII Dutch.............................................................................................................IX Introduction .............................................................................................................XI PART ONE: CREATION I. Anno 1607: Galileo and Castelli 1. Galileo in 1607..............................................................................................3 2. Castelli in 1607. The epistulae Cavenses.......................................................
    [Show full text]