DOCSLIB.ORG

National Coastal Condition Assessment 2015 Technical Support Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Coastal Condition Assessment 2015 Technical Support Document National Coastal Condition Assessment 2015 Technical Support Document U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20460 July 2021 National Coastal Condition Assessment 2015 Technical Support Document U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2020. National Coastal Condition Assessment 2015 Technical Support Document. EPA‐841-R-20-002. Office of Water and Office of Research and Development. Washington, D.C. https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys/ncca 2 National Coastal Condition Assessment 2015 Technical Support Document TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 Additional Resources for Survey Operations ................................................................................ 14 1.2 Additional Report Materials ............................................................................................................. 15 1.3 References .......................................................................................................................................... 16 2 Quality Assurance ..................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2 Survey Design .................................................................................................................................... 18 Statistical Design .......................................................................................................................18 Completeness.............................................................................................................................18 Comparability ............................................................................................................................20 2.3 Quality Assurance in Field Operations .......................................................................................... 21 Field Method Pilot Testing ......................................................................................................21 Training of Field Trainers and Assistance Visitors ..............................................................21 Field Crew Training ..................................................................................................................21 Field Assistance Visits ..............................................................................................................22 Revisits of Selected Field Sites ................................................................................................22 2.4 Laboratory Quality Assurance And Quality Control .................................................................... 22 Basic Capabilities .......................................................................................................................23 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Identifications ............................................................................23 Chemical Analyses ....................................................................................................................25 Sediment Toxicity Analyses .....................................................................................................25 2.5 Data Management And Review ...................................................................................................... 26 2.6 NCCA 2015 Report .......................................................................................................................... 26 2.7 References .......................................................................................................................................... 27 3 Selection of Probability Sites ................................................................................................................... 29 3.1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................................... 29 3.2 Estuarine Design ............................................................................................................................... 29 Target Population .....................................................................................................................29 Sample Frame ............................................................................................................................30 3 National Coastal Condition Assessment 2015 Technical Support Document Survey Design ............................................................................................................................30 Stratification ...............................................................................................................................30 Unequal Probability Categories ...............................................................................................32 Panels ..........................................................................................................................................32 Expected Sample Size ..............................................................................................................32 Site Usage and Replacement ....................................................................................................34 3.3 Great Lakes Nearshore Design ....................................................................................................... 34 Nearshore Target Population ..................................................................................................34 Nearshore Sample Frame ........................................................................................................34 Survey Design ............................................................................................................................35 Stratification ...............................................................................................................................35 Unequal Probability Categories ...............................................................................................35 Panels ..........................................................................................................................................35 Expected Sample Size ..............................................................................................................35 Site Usage and Replacement ....................................................................................................36 3.4 Great Lakes Embayment Design .................................................................................................... 37 Embayment Target Population ...............................................................................................37 Embayment Sample Frame .....................................................................................................37 Embayment Survey Design .....................................................................................................37 Stratification ...............................................................................................................................38 Unequal Probability Categories ...............................................................................................38 Panels ..........................................................................................................................................38 Expected Embayment Sample Size ........................................................................................38 3.5 Evaluation Process ............................................................................................................................ 39 3.6 Statistical Analysis.............................................................................................................................. 41 3.7 References .......................................................................................................................................... 42 4 Benthic Macroinvertebrates .................................................................................................................... 43 4.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 43 4.2 Field Collection.................................................................................................................................. 44 4.3 Data Preparation ............................................................................................................................... 45 4.4 Data Analysis ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research Identification Of
    Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2016, 2 (1), 27-32; doi: 10.3329/ajmbr.v2i1.27565 Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research ISSN 2411-4472 (Print) 2412-5571 (Online) www.ebupress.com/journal/ajmbr Article Identification of genera of tubificid worms in Bangladesh through morphological study Mariom*, Sharmin Nahar Liza and Md. Fazlul Awal Mollah Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh *Corresponding author: Mariom, Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 12 January 2016/Accepted: 17 January 2016/ Published: 31 March 2016 Abstract: Tubificids are aquatic oligochaete worms (F- Naididae, O- Haplotaxida, P- Annelida) distributed all over the world. The worms are very important as they are used as live food for fish and other aquatic invertebrates. A step was taken to identify the genera of tubicifid worms that exist in Mymensingh district, Bangladesh on the basis of some external features including the shape of their anterior (prostomium) and posterior end, number of body segment and arrangement of setae. The study result indicated the existence of three genera among the tubificid worms. These were Tubifex, Limnodrilus and Aulodrilus. All these three genera possessed a cylindrical body with a bilateral symmetry formed by a series of metameres. The number of body segments ranged from 34 to 120 in Tubifex, 50 to 87 in Limnodrilus, and 35 to 100 in Aulodrilus. In Tubifex, the first segment, with the prostomium, was round or triangular bearing appendages, whereas, in Limnodrilus and Aulodrilus, the prostomium without appendages was triangular and conical, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Annelida: Clitellata) in Korea
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 30, No. 4: 240-247, October 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2014.30.4.240 Short communication Four Unrecorded Species of Tubificid Oligochaetes (Annelida: Clitellata) in Korea Jeounghee Lee1, Jongwoo Jung1,2,* 1The Division of EcoCreative, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea 2Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea ABSTRACT Tubificid oligochaetes are common and frequently dominant in freshwater benthic habitats. They are so tolerant to water pollution that they are often used as biological indicators. Faunistic studies of Korean freshwater oligochaetes have been actively conducted recently. The most well studied oligochaete family in Korea is the tubificids following the naidids. Nine species of tubificids have been reported so far. Nevertheless, many species of tubificids still remain to be discovered in Korea. In this study, we added four species of tubificid oligochaetes to the Korean fauna, including Linmodrilus profundicola (Verrill, 1871), Potamothrix heuscheri (Bretscher, 1900), Tubifex blanchardi Vejdovsk´y, 1891, and Ilyodrilus templetoni (Southern, 1909) based on specimens collected from three locations in Korea: Cheonan-si, Geoje-si, and Seocheon-gun. In particular, P. heuscheri was first reported in Asia. Keywords: tubificid, freshwater oligochaete, Korea, Linmodrilus profundicola, Potamothrix heuscheri, Tubifex blanchardi, Ilyodrilus templetoni INTRODUCTION aréde, 1862, Monopylephorus rubroniveus Levinsen, 1884, Bothrioneurum vejdoskyanum Stolc, 1888, Rhyacodrilus Many species of Oligochaeta occur in a variety of freshwater coccineus (Vejdovsky, 1875), Rhyacodrilus sulptensis Timm, environments such as puddles, rice paddies, reservoirs, brooks, 1990 and Tubifex tubifex (Müller, 1774). Of these, L. hoffm- rivers, and streams. About 1,700 species are known (Caramelo eisteri and T.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Composed of One, Huge Germ-Line Cyst That Is Enriched with Cytoskeletal Components
    Title: The ovary of Tubifex tubifex (Clitellata, Naididae, Tubificinae) Is composed of one, huge germ-line cyst that is enriched with cytoskeletal components Author: Anna Z. Urbisz , Łukasz Chajec, Piotr Świątek Citation style: Urbisz Anna Z., Chajec Łukasz, Świątek Piotr. (2015). The ovary of Tubifex tubifex (Clitellata, Naididae, Tubificinae) Is composed of one, huge germ-line cyst that is enriched with cytoskeletal components. “PLoS ONE” (no. 10(5) (2015), art. no. e0126173), doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0126173. RESEARCH ARTICLE The Ovary of Tubifex tubifex (Clitellata, Naididae, Tubificinae) Is Composed of One, Huge Germ-Line Cyst that Is Enriched with Cytoskeletal Components Anna Z. Urbisz*, Łukasz Chajec, Piotr Świątek Department of Animal Histology and Embryology, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, 40–007 Katowice, Poland * [email protected] Abstract Recent studies on the ovary organization and oogenesis in Tubificinae have revealed that their ovaries are small polarized structures that are composed of germ cells in subsequent stages of oogenesis that are associated with somatic cells. In syncytial cysts, as a rule, each germ cell is connected to the central cytoplasmic mass, the cytophore, via only one stable intercellular bridge (ring canal). In this paper we present detailed data about the com- OPEN ACCESS position of germ-line cysts in Tubifex tubifex with special emphasis on the occurrence and distribution of the cytoskeletal elements. Using fixed material and live cell imaging tech- Citation: Urbisz AZ, Chajec Ł, Świątek P (2015) The Ovary of Tubifex tubifex (Clitellata, Naididae, niques, we found that the entire ovary of T. tubifex is composed of only one, huge multicellu- Tubificinae) Is Composed of One, Huge Germ-Line lar germ-line cyst, which may contain up to 2,600 cells.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 3: DELETION TABLES 3.1 Aluminum
    APPENDIX 3: DELETION TABLES APPENDIX 3: DELETION TABLES 3.1 Aluminum TABLE 3.1.1: Deletion process for the Santa Ana River aluminum site-specific database. Phylum Class Order Family Genus/Species Common Name Code Platyhelminthes Turbellaria Tricladida Planarlidae Girardiaia tigrina Flatworm G Annelida Oligochaeta Haplotaxida Tubificidae Tubifex tubifex Worm F Mollusca Gastropoda Limnophila Physidae Physa sp. Snail G Arthropoda Branchiopoda Diplostraca Daphnidae Ceriodaphnia dubia Cladoceran O* Arthropoda Branchiopoda Diplostraca Daphnidae Daphnia magna Cladoceran O* Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Asellidae Caecidotea aquaticus Isopod F Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Gammaridae Crangonyx pseudogracilis Amphipod F Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Gammaridae Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Amphipod G Arthropoda Insecta Plecoptera Perlidae Acroneuria sp. Stonefly O Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Chironomidae Tanytarsus dissimilis Midge G Chordata Actinopterygii Salmoniformes Salmonidae Oncorhynchus mykiss Rainbow trout D Chordata Actinopterygii Salmoniformes Salmonidae Oncorhynchus tschawytscha Chinook Salmon D Chordata Actinopterygii Salmoniformes Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic salmon D Chordata Actinopterygii Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Hybognathus amarus Rio Grande silvery minnow F Chordata Actinopterygii Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Pimephales promelas Fathead minnow S Chordata Actinopterygii Perifomes Centrarchidae Lepomis cyanellus Green sunfish S Chordata Actinopterygii Perifomes Centrarchidae Micropterus dolomieui Smallmouth bass G Chordata Actinopterygii
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Operating Procedures for the Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates February 2016 (Version 5.0)
    Standard Operating Procedures for the Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates February 2016 (Version 5.0) Prepared by: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Biological Assessment Branch This report--- has been approved for release by: Eric D. Fleek, Supervisor, Biological Assessment Branch Date Date Recommended Citation: NC Department of Environmental Quality. 2016. Standard Operating Procedures for the Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Division of Water Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina. February 2016. REVISION LOG Date Version Edited Editor Edited Section Edited Changes/updates Steven Kroeger & Hannah May 2015 Headrick Ver. 4.0 Entire Document Minor edits, and document formatting Changed “Environmental Sciences Section” to “Water Sciences Section.” Clarified that the safety committee applicable to BAB is restricted to the 4401 Reedy Creek Rd building within WSS. Added PRE-FIELD PREPARATION hydration and sunblock use as needs to prevent 15 May Michael AND CONSIDERATIONS: illness and injury during field outings. Added link 2015 Walters Ver. 4.0 Health and Safety to department instructions for reporting injuries. Under Standard Qualitative (now Full Scale) Method, added a line indicating that unionid mussels are photographed and returned to the stream. SAMPLING PROCEDURE: 15 May Michael Sample Collection Removed sentence under Swamp Method stating 2015 Walters Ver. 4.0 Methods that each sweep should be emptied into a tub. Changed the mesh size for the triangle frame sweep net (subsection Sampling Equipment) from 1000 micron to 800-900 micron after consulting the Wildlife Supply Company (our supplier for the Michael PRE-FIELD PREPARATION nets) website for specifications. Also within the 15 May Walters, Eric AND CONSIDERATIONS: subsection, put all equipment photos on a single 2015 Fleek Ver.
    [Show full text]
  • Myxobolus Cerebralis) on the Flathead Indian Reservation of Northeastern Montana
    Characteristics of streams infected by whirling disease (Myxobolus cerebralis) on the Flathead Indian Reservation of northeastern Montana Grace L. Loppnow Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, 46556 USA Abstract Whirling disease, caused by the parasite Myxobolus cerebralis, is sweeping through the streams of the intermountain west. Native and endangered species of trout are dying from this debilitating disease, damaging stream ecosystems and the recreation and fisheries they support. This study examines the relationship of stream characteristics to the abundance of Tubifex tubifex, an oligochaete host of the parasite. As T. tubifex were unable to be located, presence and abundance of other types of oligochaetes were used as a proxy to determine which streams may support the most tubifex worms. Streams with low velocity and temperature and high levels of cobble substrate seem to support the most oligochaetes. Also, stream characteristics between infected and uninfected streams were compared to determine which streams are most at risk of infection. Infected streams tend to have low cobble, and high dissolved oxygen and conductivity. These results can help to determine vulnerable streams that should be monitored and protected. Introduction Whirling disease has become a major problem in trout populations of the western United States. After its introduction from Europe in 1958, it has spread from fish farms to wild populations in streams throughout the intermountain west (Hedrick et al. 1998). The disease is caused by a myxozoan parasite, Myxobolus cerebralis. The parasite has a complex life cycle involving two hosts: it first resides in the digestive tract of Tubifex tubifex, an oligochaete worm, and once expelled it infects a salmonid fish (Wolf and Markiw 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Myxobolus Hungaricus (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) in Oligochaete Alternate Hosts
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 31: 227-232,1997 Published December 30 Dis Aquat Org Development of Myxobolus hungaricus (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) in oligochaete alternate hosts Amina El-Mansy *, Kalman Molnar Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1581 Budapest. PO Box 18, Hungary ABSTRACT. The extrapiscine development of Myxobolus hungaricus Jaczo, 1940, a myxosporean parasite of the gill of bream Abramis brama, was studied in experimentally infected oligochaetes Tubifex tubifex and Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri. Uninfected tubificids were infected w~thmature spores of M. hungaricus, and development of actinosporean stages was first observed by light microscopy 21 d later. In histological sections, early pansporocysts were located in the gut epithelium of the ex- perimental oligochaetes. Mature pansporocysts, each containing 8 triactinospores, appeared 89 d after infection. After rupture of the epithelia1 cell and the pansporocyst, free actinosporean stages were found in the gut lumen of the oligochaete. Actinospores emerged from the oligochaetes and appeared in water 102 d after infection. They were floating in water and showed a typical triactinomyxon form. Each triactinospore had 3 pyriform polar capsules, a sporoplasm with 18 secondary cells inside the spore body, a moderately long style and 3 slightly bent, conically ending tails. The total length of the triactlnospore was approximately 315 pm. The prevalence of infection in 67 oligochaetes proved to be 43.3%.No infection was found in control oligochaetes. KEY WORDS: Myxobolus hungaricus . Myxozoa . Triactinomyxon stage . Development in alternate host - Tubifex tubifex. Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri INTRODUCTION Hoffmann 1989), M. pavlovskij, a parasite of the silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Ruidisch et al. Wolf & Markiw (1984) proved that the extrapiscine 1991),M.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Temperature, Photoperiod, and Myxobolus Cerebralis On
    Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 17:338±344, 2005 q Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2005 [Article] DOI: 10.1577/H04-061.1 Effects of Temperature, Photoperiod, and Myxobolus cerebralis Infection on Growth, Reproduction, and Survival of Tubifex tubifex Lineages ROBERT DUBEY* Department of Fishery and Wildlife Sciences, New Mexico State University, Box 30003, MSC 4901, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA COLLEEN CALDWELL U.S. Geological Survey, New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, New Mexico State University, Box 30003, MSC 4901, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA WILLIAM R. GOULD University Statistics Center, New Mexico State University, MSC 3QC, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA Abstract.ÐTubifex tubifex is the de®nitive host for Myxobolus cerebralis, the causative agent of whirling disease in salmonid ®sh. Several mitochondrial lineages of T. tubifex exhibit resistance to M. cerebralis infection. Release of the triactinomyxon form of the parasite from T. tubifex varies with water temperature; however, little is known about the interactive effects of temperature and photoperiod on the susceptibility of T. tubifex lineages to M. cerebralis infection. In addition, the environmental effects on the growth, reproduction, and survival of T. tubifex lineages are unknown. Monocultures of lineages III and VI were subjected to infection (0 and 500 myxospores per worm), a range of temperatures (5, 17, and 278C), and various diurnal photoperiods (12:12, 14:10, and 16:8 dark : light) over a 70-d period by using a split±split plot experimental design. Lineage VI resisted infection by M. cerebralis at all temperatures, whereas lineage III exhibited infection levels of 4.3% at 58C, 3.3% at 178C, and 0% at 278C.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Cycle of Branchiura Sowerbyi (Oligochaeta: Naididae: Tubificinae) Cultivated Under Laboratory Conditions
    ZOOLOGIA 28 (4): 427–431, August, 2011 doi: 10.1590/S1984-46702011000400003 Reproductive cycle of Branchiura sowerbyi (Oligochaeta: Naididae: Tubificinae) cultivated under laboratory conditions Haroldo Lobo1, 2 & Roberto da Gama Alves1 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas – Comportamento e Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. 36036-900 Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil. 2 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. The biology of Branchiura sowerbyi Beddard, 1892 has been the focus of many studies in temperate regions, where the species is exotic, according to literature data. Due to its high productivity and easy cultivation, B. sowerbyi is of great interest as a food source for fish farming. The present study reports information on the reproductive biology and growth of B. sowerbyi under laboratory conditions at 25 ± 1°C. Weekly observations during 52 weeks indicated that the time between cocoon laying and young hatching was 14 to 16 days, the specific daily growth rate was 0.91 ± 0.04% (mean ± SD) and the time to reach sexual maturity was 40.83 ± 6.88 days. As reported by other authors, the hatching rate observed was low (33.08%), but the survival rate of young was high, approximately 96%. Laboratory observations showed that B. sowerbyi has two annual reproductive cycles, the first (between the 5th and 24th week) being more pronounced than the second (between the 31st and 51st week) concerning the number of cocoons. KEY WORDS. Cocoons; fish food; growth rate; oligochaete; tubificid. Branchiura sowerbyi Beddard, 1892 is commonly found DORFELD et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers
    DRAFT REVISION—September 3, 1998 Merrimack Station AR-1164 EPA 841-B-99-002 Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Second Edition http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/techmon.html By: Project Officer: Michael T. Barbour Chris Faulkner Jeroen Gerritsen Office of Water Blaine D. Snyder USEPA James B. Stribling 401 M Street, NW DRAFT REVISION—September 3, 1998 Washington, DC 20460 Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers 2 DRAFT REVISION—September 3, 1998 NOTICE This document has been reviewed and approved in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Appropriate Citation: Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C. This entire document, including data forms and other appendices, can be downloaded from the website of the USEPA Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds: http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/techmon.html DRAFT REVISION—September 3, 1998 FOREWORD In December 1986, U.S. EPA's Assistant Administrator for Water initiated a major study of the Agency's surface water monitoring activities. The resulting report, entitled "Surface Water Monitoring: A Framework for Change" (U.S. EPA 1987), emphasizes the restructuring of existing monitoring programs to better address the Agency's current priorities, e.g., toxics, nonpoint source impacts, and documentation of "environmental results." The study also provides specific recommendations on effecting the necessary changes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pollution Biology of Aquatic Oligochaetes
    The Pollution Biology of Aquatic Oligochaetes A specimen of Tubifex tubifex from the culture in the laboratory of Animal Ecotoxicology and Water Quality at the University of Basque Country. Photo: Pilar Rodriguez. Pilar Rodriguez • Trefor B. Reynoldson The Pollution Biology of Aquatic Oligochaetes Pilar Rodriguez Trefor B. Reynoldson Department of Zoology Acadia Centre for Estuarine Research and Animal Cell Biology National Water Research Institute Faculty of Science and Technology Environment Canada University of the Basque Country Acadia University P.O. Box 644 Bilbao 48080 P.O. Box 115 Spain Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6 [email protected] Canada [email protected] There are instances where we have been unable to trace or contact the copyright holder. If notified the publisher will be pleased to rectify any errors or omissions at the earliest opportunity. ISBN 978-94-007-1717-6 e-ISBN 978-94-007-1718-3 DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1718-3 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011934967 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Prologue Some 30 years ago, Ralph Brinkhurst thought that it would be appropriate to prepare a volume pulling together the current state of knowledge on the biology of aquatic oligochaetes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ornamental Fish Trade Vol
    GLOBEFISH RESEARCH PROGRAMME The Ornamental Fish Trade Vol. 102 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Products, Trade and Marketing Service Viale delle Terme di Caracalla The Ornamental Fish Trade 00153 Rome, Italy Tel.: +39 06 5705 2692 Fax: +39 06 5705 3020 www.globefish.org Volume 102 The Ornamental Fish Trade Production and Commerce of Ornamental Fish: technical-managerial and legislative aspects by Pierluigi Monticini (November 2010) The GLOBEFISH Research Programme is an activity initiated by FAO's Products, Trade and Marketing Service, Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy and Economics Division, Rome, Italy and financed jointly by: - NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), Washington, DC, USA - FROM, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid, Spain - Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Copenhagen, Denmark - European Commission, Directorate General for Fisheries, Brussels, EU - Norwegian Seafood Export Council, Tromsoe, Norway - FranceAgriMer, Montreuil-sous-Bois Cedex, France - ASMI (Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute), USA - DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans), Canada - SSA (Seafood Services Australia), Australia Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, GLOBEFISH, Products, Trade and Marketing Service, Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy and Economics Division Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy – Tel.: (39) 06570 52692 E-mail: [email protected] - Fax: (39) 06570 53020 – www.globefish.org The designation employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]