Download Special Issue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Special Issue Advances in Astronomy Gamma-Ray Burst in the Swift/Fermi Era and Beyond Lead Guest Editor: WeiKang Zheng Guest Editors: Takanori Sakamoto, Yuji Urata, and Shashi B. Pandey Gamma-Ray Burst in the Swift/Fermi Era and Beyond Advances in Astronomy Gamma-Ray Burst in the Swift/Fermi Era and Beyond Lead Guest Editor: WeiKang Zheng Guest Editors: Takanori Sakamoto, Yuji Urata, andShashiB.Pandey Copyright © 2018 Hindawi. All rights reserved. This is a special issue published in “Advances in Astronomy.” All articles are open access articles distributed under the Creative Com- mons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Editorial Board Lorenzo Amati, Italy Dieter Horns, Germany Zdzislaw E. Musielak, USA Sydney A. Barnes, Germany John Hughes, USA Valery Nakariakov, UK Miguel De Avillez, Portugal Wing-Huen Ip, Taiwan George Pavlov, USA Damien A. Easson, USA Geza Kovacs, Hungary Alexei S. Pozanenko, Russia Elmetwally Elabbasy, Egypt Michael Kueppers, Spain Somak Raychaudhury, India Chamkaur Ghag, UK Ronald Mennickent, Chile Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Spain Dean Hines, USA Ch. C. Moustakidis, Greece Roberto Turolla, Italy Contents Gamma-Ray Burst in the Swift/Fermi Era and Beyond WeiKang Zheng , Takanori Sakamoto , Yuji Urata, and Shashi B. Pandey Volume 2018, Article ID 2730676, 1 page Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Correlations M. G. Dainotti ,R.DelVecchio,andM.Tarnopolski Volume 2018, Article ID 4969503, 31 pages The Observer’s Guide to the Gamma-Ray Burst Supernova Connection Zach Cano, Shan-Qin Wang, Zi-Gao Dai, and Xue-Feng Wu Volume 2017, Article ID 8929054, 41 pages Gamma-Ray Bursts: A Radio Perspective Poonam Chandra Volume 2016, Article ID 2967813, 13 pages ADecadeofGRBFollow-UpbyBOOTESinSpain(2003–2013) Martin Jelínek, Alberto J. Castro-Tirado, Ronan Cunniffe, Javier Gorosabel, Stanislav Vítek, Petr Kubánek, Antonio de Ugarte Postigo, Sergey Guziy, Juan C. Tello, Petr Páta, Rubén Sánchez-Ramírez, Samantha Oates, Soomin Jeong, Jan Štrobl, Sebastián Castillo-Carrión, Tomás Mateo Sanguino, Ovidio Rabaza, Dolores Pérez-Ramírez, Rafael Fernández-Muñoz, Benito A. de la Morena Carretero, René Hudec, Víctor Reglero, and Lola Sabau-Graziati Volume 2016, Article ID 1928465, 12 pages Kilonova/Macronova Emission from Compact Binary Mergers Masaomi Tanaka Volume 2016, Article ID 6341974, 12 pages Diverse Features of the Multiwavelength Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts: Natural or Special? J. J. Geng and Y. F. Huang Volume 2016, Article ID 1592148, 10 pages Hindawi Advances in Astronomy Volume 2018, Article ID 2730676, 1 page https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2730676 Editorial Gamma-Ray Burst in the Swift/Fermi Era and Beyond WeiKang Zheng ,1 Takanori Sakamoto ,2 Yuji Urata,3 and Shashi B. Pandey 4 1 Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA 2Department of Physics and Mathematics, Aoyama Gakuin University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5258, Japan 3Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, Chung-Li 32054, Taiwan 4Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Manora Peak, Nainital 263002, India Correspondence should be addressed to WeiKang Zheng; [email protected] Received 20 December 2016; Accepted 20 December 2016; Published 1 February 2018 Copyright © WeiKang Zheng et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. e Swift and Fermi satellites have been observing gamma- Overall, this volume extends the discussions of the raybursts(GRBs),whichareshort-livedandintenseashesof previously published special issue, “Gamma-Ray Bursts in the gamma-rays associated with the death/explosion of massive Swi and Fermi Era,” and covers more topics about GRBs stars and/or compact binary mergers, for nearly a decade from gamma-ray to radio wavelengths. ese are the most in space since their launch in and , respectively. updated summaries of progress on GRB studies during the Our understanding of GRB physics, though still far from Swift and Fermi mission periods. We hope these two special complete, has been revolutionized thanks to their outstand- issues provide useful information for GRB researchers, help- ing observations, as well as the ongoing ground follow-up ingtoleadtonewresultsandprogressevenbeyondtheSwift observations. In addition to a previously published special and Fermi era. issue, “Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swi and Fermi Era,” which discussed GRB work related to the Swift and Fermi missions, Acknowledgments here we continue collecting reviews and research articles on GRBs and their a erglows. We sincerely thank the authors and referees for all of their In total, ve reviews and one research article are published e orts. in this special issue. e review article by M. Tanaka sum- marizes the current understanding of kilonovae/macronovae WeiKang Zheng related to the GRBs. In comparison, Z. Cano et al. present Takanori Sakamoto an up-to-date review of progress on the connection between Yuji Urata supernovae and long-duration GRBs. Next, the review article Shashi B. Pandey by M. Dainotti et al. discusses various GRB correlations duringthepromptphaseandtheiruseasredshi estimators and possibly as cosmological tools. In contrast, the review byJ.J.GengandY.F.HuangfocusesontheGRBa erglow phase, discussing the diverse features of the multiwavelength a erglows of GRBs. One other article by M. Jelinek et al. presents a decade of optical follow-up observations of GRBs by the BOOTES telescope in Spain. Lastly, P. Chandra discusses GRBs from the radio perspective, which is very important for studies of GRBs related to their calorimetry, reverse-shock emission, and circumburst environments. Hindawi Advances in Astronomy Volume 2018, Article ID 4969503, 31 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4969503 Review Article Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Correlations M. G. Dainotti ,1,2,3 R. Del Vecchio,3 and M. Tarnopolski3 1 Physics Department, Stanford University, Via Pueblo Mall 382, Stanford, CA, USA 2INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy 3Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Orla 171, 30-244 Krakow,´ Poland Correspondence should be addressed to M. G. Dainotti; [email protected] Received 25 May 2016; Accepted 27 November 2016; Published 24 January 2018 Academic Editor: Alberto J. Castro-Tirado Copyright © 2018 M. G. Dainotti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The mechanism responsible for the prompt emission of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is still a debated issue. The prompt phase-related GRB correlations can allow discriminating among the most plausible theoretical models explaining this emission. We present an overview of the observational two-parameter correlations, their physical interpretations, and their use as redshift estimators and possibly as cosmological tools. The nowadays challenge is to make GRBs, the farthest stellar-scaled objects observed (up to redshift = 9.4), standard candles through well established and robust correlations. However, GRBs spanning several orders of magnitude in their energetics are far from being standard candles. We describe the advances in the prompt correlation research in the past decades, with particular focus paid to the discoveries in the last 20 years. 1. Introduction quences of the anisotropic celestial distribution of SGRBs were discussed lately by Mesz´ aros´ et al. [24] and Mesz´ aros´ Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are highly energetic events and Rees [6]. Finally, the progenitors of LGRBs are associated with the total isotropic energy released of the order of with supernovae (SNe) [25–29] related to collapse of massive 48 55 10 –10 erg (for recent reviews, see [1–6]). GRBs were stars. Progenitors of SGRBs are thought to be neutron discovered by military satellites Vela in late 1960s and were star–black hole (NS–BH) or NS–NS mergers [12, 30–32], and recognized early to be of extrasolar origin [7]. A bimodal no connection between SGRBs and SNe has been proven [33]. structure (reported first by Mazets et al. [8]) in the duration While the recent first direct detection of gravitational distribution of GRBs detected by the Burst and Transient waves (GW), termed GW150914, by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) [34], interpreted Source Experiment (BATSE) onboard the Compton Gamma- +5 asamergeroftwostellar-massBHswithmasses36−4 ⊙ Ray Observatory (CGRO) [9], based on which GRBs are +4 nowadays commonly classified into short (with durations and 29−4 ⊙, is by itself a discovery of prime importance, 90 <2s, SGRBs) and long (with 90 >2s, LGRBs), it becomes especially interesting in light of the finding of was found [10]. BATSE observations allowed also confirming Connaughton et al. [35] who reported a weak transient the hypothesis of Klebesadel et al. [7] that GRBs are of source lasting 1 s and detected by Fermi/GBM [36] only extragalactic origin due to isotropic angular distribution in 0.4 s after the GW150914, termed GW150914-GBM. Its false the sky combined with the fact that they exhibited an intensity alarmprobabilityisestimatedtobe0.0022.Thefluencein +1.5 distribution that deviated strongly from the −3/2 power law theenergyband1keV–10MeViscomputedtobe1.8−1.0
Recommended publications
  • Astronomie in Theorie Und Praxis 8. Auflage in Zwei Bänden Erik Wischnewski
    Astronomie in Theorie und Praxis 8. Auflage in zwei Bänden Erik Wischnewski Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Beobachtungen mit bloßem Auge 37 Motivation 37 Hilfsmittel 38 Drehbare Sternkarte Bücher und Atlanten Kataloge Planetariumssoftware Elektronischer Almanach Sternkarten 39 2 Atmosphäre der Erde 49 Aufbau 49 Atmosphärische Fenster 51 Warum der Himmel blau ist? 52 Extinktion 52 Extinktionsgleichung Photometrie Refraktion 55 Szintillationsrauschen 56 Angaben zur Beobachtung 57 Durchsicht Himmelshelligkeit Luftunruhe Beispiel einer Notiz Taupunkt 59 Solar-terrestrische Beziehungen 60 Klassifizierung der Flares Korrelation zur Fleckenrelativzahl Luftleuchten 62 Polarlichter 63 Nachtleuchtende Wolken 64 Haloerscheinungen 67 Formen Häufigkeit Beobachtung Photographie Grüner Strahl 69 Zodiakallicht 71 Dämmerung 72 Definition Purpurlicht Gegendämmerung Venusgürtel Erdschattenbogen 3 Optische Teleskope 75 Fernrohrtypen 76 Refraktoren Reflektoren Fokus Optische Fehler 82 Farbfehler Kugelgestaltsfehler Bildfeldwölbung Koma Astigmatismus Verzeichnung Bildverzerrungen Helligkeitsinhomogenität Objektive 86 Linsenobjektive Spiegelobjektive Vergütung Optische Qualitätsprüfung RC-Wert RGB-Chromasietest Okulare 97 Zusatzoptiken 100 Barlow-Linse Shapley-Linse Flattener Spezialokulare Spektroskopie Herschel-Prisma Fabry-Pérot-Interferometer Vergrößerung 103 Welche Vergrößerung ist die Beste? Blickfeld 105 Lichtstärke 106 Kontrast Dämmerungszahl Auflösungsvermögen 108 Strehl-Zahl Luftunruhe (Seeing) 112 Tubusseeing Kuppelseeing Gebäudeseeing Montierungen 113 Nachführfehler
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Universe Expanding?: an Historical and Philosophical Perspective for Cosmologists Starting Anew
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1996 Is the Universe Expanding?: An Historical and Philosophical Perspective for Cosmologists Starting Anew David A. Vlosak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Cosmology, Relativity, and Gravity Commons Recommended Citation Vlosak, David A., "Is the Universe Expanding?: An Historical and Philosophical Perspective for Cosmologists Starting Anew" (1996). Master's Theses. 3474. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3474 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IS THEUN IVERSE EXPANDING?: AN HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE FOR COSMOLOGISTS STAR TING ANEW by David A Vlasak A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements forthe Degree of Master of Arts Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 1996 IS THE UNIVERSE EXPANDING?: AN HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE FOR COSMOLOGISTS STARTING ANEW David A Vlasak, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1996 This study addresses the problem of how scientists ought to go about resolving the current crisis in big bang cosmology. Although this problem can be addressed by scientists themselves at the level of their own practice, this study addresses it at the meta­ level by using the resources offered by philosophy of science. There are two ways to resolve the current crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • External Shocks (Reverse) (Forward)
    Open Ques)ons in GRB Physics (Bing Zhang, University of Nevada Las Vegas) (Zhang 2011, Comptes Rendus Physique, 12, 206-225; arXiv:1104.0932) Jul. 10, 2012 Gamma 2012, Heidelberg, July 9-13, 2012 Gamma-ray bursts: the most luminous explosions in the universe The GRB field • An ac)ve, exci)ng field • Due to their elusive nature, it is very difficult to observe GRBs in all the temporal and spectral regimes • the mystery of GRBs is gradually unveiled when new temporal or spectral windows are opened • GRBs may be also strong emiNers of non- electromagne)c signals (e.g. high energy neutrinos, gravitaonal waves) • A sketch of physical picture is available, but many details remain vague – many open quesons Physical Picture: A Sketch Afterglow Progenitor Central GRB prompt emission Engine photosphere internal (shock) external shocks (reverse) (forward) Increasingly difficult to diagnose with electromagnetic signals Open Ques)ons in GRB Physics • Progenitors & classificaon (massive stars vs. compact stars; others? how many physically dis)nct types?) • Central engine (black hole, magnetar?) • Ejecta composi)on (baryonic, leptonic, magne)c?) • Energy dissipaon mechanism (shock vs. magne)c reconnec)on) • Par)cle acceleraon & radiaon mechanisms (synchrotron, inverse Compton, quasi-thermal) • Aerglow physics (medium interac)on vs. long-term engine ac)vity) Open Queson 1: Origin of Aerglow Physical Picture: A Sketch Afterglow Progenitor Central GRB prompt emission Engine photosphere internal (shock) external shocks (reverse) (forward) Standard aerglow model Synchrotron emission from external forward shock: Meszaros & Rees (1997); Sari et al. (1998) AZerglow Closure Relaons Well-predicted temporal decay indices and spectral indices Pre-SwiZ: Confron)ng data with theory Panaitescu & Kumar (01, 02) SwiZ surprise Gehrels et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Massimiliano De Pasquale, Phd
    Prot. n. 0070016 del 29/07/2020 - [UOR: SI001070 - Classif. II/7] !1 Massimiliano De Pasquale, PhD a) Personal Details Date and Place of Birth: 3 August 1975, Messina (Italy). Nationality: Italian. Current Address: Istanbul University, Beyazıt Campus, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences. Beyazıt, Istanbul, 34119, Turkey. Telephone: +90 505 033 6800 Fax: +90 2124400370 E-mail: [email protected] b) Education 1999–2002 PhD in Physics at University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy. Dissertation delivered on 20/01/2003. Title: “Progenitors and energy sources of Gamma-ray Bursts: a study of BeppoSAX observation archive”. Supervisors: Dr. L. Piro, Prof. R. Ruffini. Final grade: “very good”. 1993–1999 Master of Science in Physics at University of Messina, Italy. Dissertation delivered on 20/10/1999. Title: "Estimates of ultra high energy neutrino fluxes from Gamma-ray Bursts detectable by large scale Cherenkov submarine telescopes”. Final grade: 110/110 cum laude. c) Professional History November 2016 – present: Assistant Professor at Istanbul University, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences. May 2015 – October 2016: Research Associate – Swift UV/Optical Telescope (UVOT) Instrument Scientist at Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London (MSSL- UCL). UVOT Burst Support Scientist (UBS) in the Swift Gamma-ray Burst (GRB) mission. 2014 – April 2015: Post-Doctoral position at Institute of Space Astrophysics and Cosmic Physics of Palermo (IASF-Palermo), Italy. X-ray Telescope Burst Support Scientist (XBS) and Burst Advocate (BA) in the Swift GRB mission. 2013 – 2014: Research Associate – Swift/UVOT Instrument Scientist at MSSL-UCL. UBS and BA in the Swift GRB mission. 2011 – 2012: Post-Doctoral Research Scholar at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN R. THORSTENSEN Address
    CURRICULUM VITAE: JOHN R. THORSTENSEN Address: Department of Physics and Astronomy Dartmouth College 6127 Wilder Laboratory Hanover, NH 03755-3528; (603)-646-2869 [email protected] Undergraduate Studies: Haverford College, B. A. 1974 Astronomy and Physics double major, High Honors in both. Graduate Studies: Ph. D., 1980, University of California, Berkeley Astronomy Department Dissertation : \Optical Studies of Faint Blue X-ray Stars" Graduate Advisor: Professor C. Stuart Bowyer Employment History: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College: { Professor, July 1991 { present { Associate Professor, July 1986 { July 1991 { Assistant Professor, September 1980 { June 1986 Research Assistant, Space Sciences Lab., U.C. Berkeley, 1975 { 1980. Summer Student, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 1974. Summer Student, Bartol Research Foundation, 1973. Consultant, IBM Corporation, 1973. (STARMAP program). Honors and Awards: Phi Beta Kappa, 1974. National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow, 1974 { 1977. Dorothea Klumpke Roberts Award of the Berkeley Astronomy Dept., 1978. Professional Societies: American Astronomical Society Astronomical Society of the Pacific International Astronomical Union Lifetime Publication List * \Can Collapsed Stars Close the Universe?" Thorstensen, J. R., and Partridge, R. B. 1975, Ap. J., 200, 527. \Optical Identification of Nova Scuti 1975." Raff, M. I., and Thorstensen, J. 1975, P. A. S. P., 87, 593. \Photometry of Slow X-ray Pulsars II: The 13.9 Minute Period of X Persei." Margon, B., Thorstensen, J., Bowyer, S., Mason, K. O., White, N. E., Sanford, P. W., Parkes, G., Stone, R. P. S., and Bailey, J. 1977, Ap. J., 218, 504. \A Spectrophotometric Survey of the A 0535+26 Field." Margon, B., Thorstensen, J., Nelson, J., Chanan, G., and Bowyer, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminosity - Wikipedia
    12/2/2018 Luminosity - Wikipedia Luminosity In astronomy, luminosity is the total amount of energy emitted by a star, galaxy, or other astronomical object per unit time.[1] It is related to the brightness, which is the luminosity of an object in a given spectral region.[1] In SI units luminosity is measured in joules per second or watts. Values for luminosity are often given in the terms of the luminosity of the Sun, L⊙. Luminosity can also be given in terms of magnitude: the absolute bolometric magnitude (Mbol) of an object is a logarithmic measure of its total energy emission rate. Contents Measuring luminosity Stellar luminosity Image of galaxy NGC 4945 showing Radio luminosity the huge luminosity of the central few star clusters, suggesting there is an Magnitude AGN located in the center of the Luminosity formulae galaxy. Magnitude formulae See also References Further reading External links Measuring luminosity In astronomy, luminosity is the amount of electromagnetic energy a body radiates per unit of time.[2] When not qualified, the term "luminosity" means bolometric luminosity, which is measured either in the SI units, watts, or in terms of solar luminosities (L☉). A bolometer is the instrument used to measure radiant energy over a wide band by absorption and measurement of heating. A star also radiates neutrinos, which carry off some energy (about 2% in the case of our Sun), contributing to the star's total luminosity.[3] The IAU has defined a nominal solar luminosity of 3.828 × 102 6 W to promote publication of consistent and comparable values in units of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity 1/9 12/2/2018 Luminosity - Wikipedia the solar luminosity.[4] While bolometers do exist, they cannot be used to measure even the apparent brightness of a star because they are insufficiently sensitive across the electromagnetic spectrum and because most wavelengths do not reach the surface of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAGELLANIC CLOUDS NEWSLETTER an Electronic Publication Dedicated to the Magellanic Clouds, and Astrophysical Phenomena Therein
    THE MAGELLANIC CLOUDS NEWSLETTER An electronic publication dedicated to the Magellanic Clouds, and astrophysical phenomena therein No. 135 — 1 June 2015 http://www.astro.keele.ac.uk/MCnews Editor: Jacco van Loon Editorial Dear Colleagues, It is my pleasure to present you the 135th issue of the Magellanic Clouds Newsletter. From magnetism and galactic structure and interaction, to variable, massive, (post-)AGB and exploding stars, and more on star cluster content – there’s something for everyone. Hope to see you at the IAU General Assembly in August, or in Baltimore in October! The next issue is planned to be distributed on the 1st of August. Editorially Yours, Jacco van Loon 1 Refereed Journal Papers Photometric identification of the periods of the first candidate extragalactic magnetic stars Ya¨el Naz´e1, Nolan R Walborn2, Nidia Morrell3, Gregg A Wade4 and MichaÃl K. Szyma´nski5 1University of LI`ege, Belgium 2STScI, USA 3Las Campanas Observatory, Chile 4Royal Military College, USA 5Warsaw University, Poland Galactic stars belonging to the Of?p category are all strongly magnetic objects exhibiting rotationally modulated spectral and photometric changes on timescales of weeks to years. Five candidate Of?p stars in the Magellanic Clouds have been discovered, notably in the context of ongoing surveys of their massive star populations. Here we describe an investigation of their photometric behaviour, revealing significant variability in all studied objects on timescales of one week to more than four years, including clearly periodic variations for three of them. Their spectral characteristics along with these photometric changes provide further support for the hypothesis that these are strongly magnetized O stars, analogous to the Of?p stars in the Galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • HST Public Lecture Series
    WelcomeWelcome toto thethe SpaceSpace TelescopeTelescope ScienceScience InstituteInstitute’’ss PublicPublic LectureLecture SeriesSeries zz YourYour host:host: MaxMax MutchlerMutchler zz LithographsLithographs onon tabletable z PleasePlease taketake oneone perper personperson TONIGHT TransNeptunianTransNeptunian BinariesBinaries andand CollisionCollision Families:Families: ProbesProbes ofof OurOur LocalLocal DustDust DiskDisk SusanSusan BenecchiBenecchi MayMay 5,5, 20092009 88 PMPM STScISTScI AuditoriumAuditorium UpcomingUpcoming TalksTalks zz JuneJune 2,2, 20092009 –– JasonJason TumlinsonTumlinson,, TheThe InvisibleInvisible Galaxy:Galaxy: NewNew ViewsViews ofof thethe MilkyMilky WayWay zz JulyJuly 7,7, 20092009 –– DouglasDouglas Long,Long, TheThe MysteryMystery ofof thethe ‘‘BeBe’’ StarsStars WebWeb SiteSite && WebcastWebcast • Google “hubble lecture” • http://hubblesite.org/go/talks • List of upcoming speakers • Link to current webcast • Links to previous webcasts Scientific Symposium May 4-7 Public Lecture May 8 at 7:00 PM at the Maryland Science Center: Dr. Steven Squyers (Cornell): Roving Mars Hubble Servicing Mission 4 Launch currently set for May 11, 2009 Two Space Shuttles sitting on the launch pad Hubble was deployed and is serviced by the Space Shuttle 1990 1993 1997 1999 2002 2009 5 days of spacewalking! Hubble mission milestones as chronicled by it’s workhorse: Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2, to be replaced with WFC3) “Top 10 reasons why the Hubble telescope isn’t working…” WFPC2 installed during servicing mission 1
    [Show full text]
  • Remerciements – Unité 1
    TVO ILC SNC1D Remerciements Remerciements – Unité 1 Graphs, diagrams, illustrations, images in this course, unless otherwise specified, are ILC created, Copyright © 2018 The Ontario Educational Communications Authority. All rights reserved. Intro Video, Copyright © 2018 The Ontario Educational Communications Authority. All rights reserved. All title artwork and graphics, unless otherwise specified, Copyright © 2018The Ontario Educational Communications Authority. All rights reserved. Logo: Science Presse , Agence Science-Presse, URL: https://www.sciencepresse.qc.ca/, Accessed 14/01/2019. Logo: Curium, Curium, URL: https://curiummag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/logo_ curium-web.png, Accessed 14/01/2019. Logo: Science Étonnante, David Louapre, URL: https://sciencetonnante.wordpress.com/, Accessed 20/03/2018, © 2018 HowStuffWorks, a division of InfoSpace Holdings LLC, a System1 Company. Blog, blogging and blogglers theme, djvstock/iStock/Getty Images Logo: Wordpress, WordPress.com, Automattic Inc., URL: https://wordpress.com/, Accessed 20/03/2018, © The WordPress Foundation. Logo: Wix, Wix.com, Inc., URL: https://static.wixstatic.com/ media/9ab0d1_39d56f21398048df8af89aab0cec67b8~mv1.png, Accessed 14/01/2019. Logo: Blogger, Blogger, Inc., ZyMOS, URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blogger. svg, Accessed 20/03/2018, © Google LLC. HOME A film by Yann Arthus-Bertrand, GoodPlanet Foundation, Europacorp and Elzévir Films, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GItD10Joaa0, Published 04/02/2009, Accessed 20/04/2018, Courtesy of the GoodPlanet
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: Gw170817 and Grb 170817A
    Draft version October 15, 2017 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND GAMMA-RAYS FROM A BINARY NEUTRON STAR MERGER: GW170817 AND GRB 170817A B. P. Abbott,1 R. Abbott,1 T. D. Abbott,2 F. Acernese,3, 4 K. Ackley,5, 6 C. Adams,7 T. Adams,8 P. Addesso,9 R. X. Adhikari,1 V. B. Adya,10 C. Affeldt,10 M. Afrough,11 B. Agarwal,12 M. Agathos,13 K. Agatsuma,14 N. Aggarwal,15 O. D. Aguiar,16 L. Aiello,17, 18 A. Ain,19 P. Ajith,20 B. Allen,10, 21, 22 G. Allen,12 A. Allocca,23, 24 M. A. Aloy,25 P. A. Altin,26 A. Amato,27 A. Ananyeva,1 S. B. Anderson,1 W. G. Anderson,21 S. V. Angelova,28 S. Antier,29 S. Appert,1 K. Arai,1 M. C. Araya,1 J. S. Areeda,30 N. Arnaud,29, 31 K. G. Arun,32 S. Ascenzi,33, 34 G. Ashton,10 M. Ast,35 S. M. Aston,7 P. Astone,36 D. V. Atallah,37 P. Aufmuth,22 C. Aulbert,10 K. AultONeal,38 C. Austin,2 A. Avila-Alvarez,30 S. Babak,39 P. Bacon,40 M. K. M. Bader,14 S. Bae,41 P. T. Baker,42 F. Baldaccini,43, 44 G. Ballardin,31 S. W. Ballmer,45 S. Banagiri,46 J. C. Barayoga,1 S. E. Barclay,47 B. C. Barish,1 D. Barker,48 K. Barkett,49 F. Barone,3, 4 B. Barr,47 L. Barsotti,15 M. Barsuglia,40 D. Barta,50 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cfa in the News ~ Week Ending 3 January 2010
    Wolbach Library: CfA in the News ~ Week ending 3 January 2010 1. New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 2. 2009 in science and medicine, ROGER SCHLUETER, Belleville News Democrat (IL), Sunday, January 3, 2010 3. 'Science, celestial bodies have always inspired humankind', Staff Correspondent, Hindu (India), Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4. Why is Carpenter defending scientists?, The Morning Call, Morning Call (Allentown, PA), FIRST ed, pA25, Sunday, December 27, 2009 5. CORRECTIONS, OPINION BY RYAN FINLEY, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star (AZ), FINAL ed, pA2, Saturday, December 19, 2009 6. We see a 'Super-Earth', TOM BEAL; TOM BEAL, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star, (AZ), FINAL ed, pA1, Thursday, December 17, 2009 Record - 1 DIALOG(R) New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 TEXT: "In this paper we report on testing the 'rolen model' and 'opportunity-structure' hypotheses about the parents whom scientists mentioned as career influencers. According to the role-model hypothesis, the gender match between scientist and influencer is paramount (for example, women scientists would disproportionately often mention their mothers as career influencers)," scientists writing in the journal Social Studies of Science report (see also ). "According to the opportunity-structure hypothesis, the parent's educational level predicts his/her probability of being mentioned as a career influencer (that ism parents with higher educational levels would be more likely to be named). The examination of a sample of American scientists who had received prestigious postdoctoral fellowships resulted in rejecting the role-model hypothesis and corroborating the opportunity-structure hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasmas in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Particle Acceleration, Magnetic Fields, Radiative Processes and Environments
    galaxies Article Plasmas in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Particle Acceleration, Magnetic Fields, Radiative Processes and Environments Asaf Pe’er Physics Department, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel; [email protected]; Tel.: +972-3-5318438 Received: 22 November 2018; Accepted: 7 February 2019; Published: 15 February 2019 Abstract: Being the most extreme explosions in the universe, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) provide a unique laboratory to study various plasma physics phenomena. The complex light curve and broad-band, non-thermal spectra indicate a very complicated system on the one hand, but, on the other hand, provide a wealth of information to study it. In this chapter, I focus on recent progress in some of the key unsolved physical problems. These include: (1) particle acceleration and magnetic field generation in shock waves; (2) possible role of strong magnetic fields in accelerating the plasmas, and accelerating particles via the magnetic reconnection process; (3) various radiative processes that shape the observed light curve and spectra, both during the prompt and the afterglow phases, and finally (4) GRB environments and their possible observational signature. Keywords: jets; radiation mechanism: non-thermal; galaxies: active; gamma-ray bursts; TBD 1. Introduction Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most extreme explosions known since the big bang, releasing as much as 1055 erg (isotropically equivalent) in a few seconds, in the form of gamma rays [1]. Such a huge amount of energy released in such a short time must be accompanied by a relativistic motion of a relativistically expanding plasma. There are two separate arguments for that. First, the existence of > ± photons at energies ∼ MeV as are observed in many GRBs necessitates the production of e pairs by photon–photon interactions, as long as the optical depth for such interactions is greater than unity.
    [Show full text]