DOCSLIB.ORG

Wildlife Hazard Assessment Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wildlife Hazard Assessment Final Report Wildlife Hazard Assessment Final Report Wayne County Airport Smithville, Ohio CHA Project Number: 27243 Prepared for: Wayne County Commissioners 428 West Liberty Street Wooster, Ohio Prepared by: Simon Davies – Wildlife Biologist 300 S. Meridian Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46225 Phone: 317493-3721 December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 LEGAL STATUS OF WILDLIFE SPECIES .............................................................................................. 5 2.1 Federal Regulations ................................................................................................ 5 2.2 State and Local Regulations .................................................................................... 5 3.0 WILDLIFE STRIKES .................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Collecting and Reporting Wildlife Strike Data ........................................................ 7 4.0 WILDLIFE HAZARD ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Site Description ....................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Habitat Description ............................................................................................... 11 4.3 Adjacent land use .................................................................................................. 11 5.0 WILDLIFE ATTRACTANTS .......................................................................................................... 11 5.1 On-site Attractants ................................................................................................ 12 5.2 Off-site Attractants ............................................................................................... 13 5.3 Wildlife .................................................................................................................. 13 5.4 Wildlife-aircraft Strike Analysis ............................................................................. 14 5.5 Current Wildlife Hazard Management .................................................................. 14 6.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 14 6.1 Bird Surveys........................................................................................................... 14 6.2 Mammal Surveys ................................................................................................... 15 7.0 ANALYSIS OF SURVEY DATA ...................................................................................................... 16 7.1 Survey Results ....................................................................................................... 16 7.1.1 Bird Surveys............................................................................................... 16 7.1.2 Mammal Surveys ....................................................................................... 21 8.0 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 21 8.1 Bird Guilds ............................................................................................................. 21 8.1.1 Waterfowl ................................................................................................. 21 8.1.2 Blackbirds .................................................................................................. 23 8.1.3 Passerines ................................................................................................. 26 8.1.4 Columbids (Pigeons and Doves) ................................................................ 27 8.1.5 Aerial Foragers .......................................................................................... 29 8.1.6 Shorebirds ................................................................................................. 30 8.1.7 Gulls .......................................................................................................... 31 Wayne County Commissioners Wayne County Airport CHA Project No. 27243 Page 1 8.1.8 Raptors ...................................................................................................... 32 8.2 Mammals .............................................................................................................. 34 8.2.1 White-tailed Deer ..................................................................................... 34 8.2.2 Eastern Coyote .......................................................................................... 35 8.2.3 Small Mammals ......................................................................................... 37 9.0 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................ 38 9.1 Wildlife Fencing ..................................................................................................... 38 9.2 “Zero Tolearance Policy” ...................................................................................... 39 9.3 Training of personnel ............................................................................................ 39 9.4 Agricultural Management ..................................................................................... 39 9.5 Grass Management ............................................................................................... 40 9.6 Wildlife Monitoring ............................................................................................... 40 9.7 Wildlife control responsibilities ............................................................................ 41 9.8 Permits .................................................................................................................. 41 9.9 Wildlife strike reporting ........................................................................................ 41 9.10 Maintain Appropriate Supplies ............................................................................. 42 9.11 Eliminate/Reduce Wetland and Water Sources on the Airfield ........................... 42 9.12 Seasonal control efforts ........................................................................................ 43 9.13 Monitor Off-Site Attractants ................................................................................. 43 10.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 44 Wayne County Commissioners Wayne County Airport CHA Project No. 27243 Page 2 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A FAA Certalert 09-10, Wildlife Hazard Assessments in Accordance with Part 139 Requirements Appendix B Ohio Threatened and Endangered Species Appendix C 50 CFR 10.13 General Provisions, List of Migratory Bird Species Appendix D FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-32B, Reporting Wildlife Aircraft Strikes Appendix E Guidelines for Submitting Bird Remains for Identification to the Smithsonian Institution Feather Lab Appendix F Inventory of Species and Guilds Observed During the WHA Appendix G FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports Appendix H FAA Cert Alert 04-16, Deer Hazard to Aircraft and Deer Fencing Appendix I FAA Cert Alert 98-05, Grasses Attractive to Hazardous Wildlife Appendix J AOU Bird Codes Wayne County Commissioners Wayne County Airport CHA Project No. 27243 Page 3 1.0 BACKGROUND Beginning in October 2013 and extending through September 2014, a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA) was conducted at the Wayne County Airport (BJJ) in Smithville, Ohio. Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, part 139, § 139.337(b) requires that a Wildlife Hazard Assessment be conducted when any of the following events occurs on or near the airport. 1. An aircraft experiences multiple wildlife strikes. 2. An aircraft experiences an engine ingestion of wildlife or substantial damage (defined as damage or structural failure that adversely affects the structural strength, performance, or flight characteristics of the aircraft that would normally require major repair or replacement of the affected component) from striking wildlife. 3. Wildlife of a size, or in numbers, capable of causing one of the events described above is observed to have access to any airport flight pattern or aircraft movement area. Although BJJ is not certified under Part 139, the Federal Register Volume 78, No .18 (January 28, 2013) clarified the WHA requirements for non-certified airports. This clarification required non-certificated, Federally obligated airports that accept a new airport development grant funded under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) must conduct a wildlife site visit or a WHA. The FAA divided these facilities into four categories based on based aircraft and total operations. The four categories were: 1. If an airports had 100 or more based turbine-powered aircraft or 75,000 or more total annual operations, the airport sponsor had to initiate a WHA within three years of receiving an AIP grant after the Federal Register notice. 2. If an airport had between 20 and 99 based turbine-powered aircraft or 30,000 to 74,999 total annual operations, a wildlife site visit must be initiated within three years of receiving a development grant after the final Federal Register notice. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus Northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A
    Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 3-1-2011 Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation Valerie A. Lee Loma Linda University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Valerie A., "Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation" (2011). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 37. http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/37 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Vocalization Behavior of the Endangered Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi): Ontogenetic, Sexual, Temporal, Duetting Pair, and Geographic Variation by Valerie A. Lee ____________________ A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology ____________________ March 2011 © 2011 Valerie A. Lee All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this thesis in his/her opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree Master of Science. , Chairperson William K. Hayes, Professor of Biology Stephen G.
    [Show full text]
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dominican Republic Endemics of Hispaniola II 1St February to 9Th February 2021 (9 Days)
    Dominican Republic Endemics of Hispaniola II 1st February to 9th February 2021 (9 days) Palmchat by Adam Riley Although the Dominican Republic is perhaps best known for its luxurious beaches, outstanding food and vibrant culture, this island has much to offer both the avid birder and general naturalist alike. Because of the amazing biodiversity sustained on the island, Hispaniola ranks highest in the world as a priority for bird protection! This 8-day birding tour provides the perfect opportunity to encounter nearly all of the island’s 32 endemic bird species, plus other Greater Antillean specialities. We accomplish this by thoroughly exploring the island’s variety of habitats, from the evergreen and Pine forests of the Sierra de Bahoruco to the dry forests of the coast. Furthermore, our accommodation ranges from remote cabins deep in the forest to well-appointed hotels on the beach, each with its own unique local flair. Join us for this delightful tour to the most diverse island in the Caribbean! RBL Dominican Republic Itinerary 2 THE TOUR AT A GLANCE… THE ITINERARY Day 1 Arrival in Santo Domingo Day 2 Santo Domingo Botanical Gardens to Sabana del Mar (Paraiso Caño Hondo) Day 3 Paraiso Caño Hondo to Santo Domingo Day 4 Salinas de Bani to Pedernales Day 5 Cabo Rojo & Southern Sierra de Bahoruco Day 6 Cachote to Villa Barrancoli Day 7 Northern Sierra de Bahoruco Day 8 La Placa, Laguna Rincon to Santo Domingo Day 9 International Departures TOUR ROUTE MAP… RBL Dominican Republic Itinerary 3 THE TOUR IN DETAIL… Day 1: Arrival in Santo Domingo.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Caribbean Ornithology
    THE J OURNAL OF CARIBBEAN ORNITHOLOGY SOCIETY FOR THE C ONSERVATION AND S TUDY OF C ARIBBEAN B IRDS S OCIEDAD PARA LA C ONSERVACIÓN Y E STUDIO DE LAS A VES C ARIBEÑAS ASSOCIATION POUR LA C ONSERVATION ET L’ E TUDE DES O ISEAUX DE LA C ARAÏBE 2005 Vol. 18, No. 1 (ISSN 1527-7151) Formerly EL P ITIRRE CONTENTS RECUPERACIÓN DE A VES M IGRATORIAS N EÁRTICAS DEL O RDEN A NSERIFORMES EN C UBA . Pedro Blanco y Bárbara Sánchez ………………....................................................................................................................................................... 1 INVENTARIO DE LA A VIFAUNA DE T OPES DE C OLLANTES , S ANCTI S PÍRITUS , C UBA . Bárbara Sánchez ……..................... 7 NUEVO R EGISTRO Y C OMENTARIOS A DICIONALES S OBRE LA A VOCETA ( RECURVIROSTRA AMERICANA ) EN C UBA . Omar Labrada, Pedro Blanco, Elizabet S. Delgado, y Jarreton P. Rivero............................................................................... 13 AVES DE C AYO C ARENAS , C IÉNAGA DE B IRAMA , C UBA . Omar Labrada y Gabriel Cisneros ……………........................ 16 FORAGING B EHAVIOR OF T WO T YRANT F LYCATCHERS IN T RINIDAD : THE G REAT K ISKADEE ( PITANGUS SULPHURATUS ) AND T ROPICAL K INGBIRD ( TYRANNUS MELANCHOLICUS ). Nadira Mathura, Shawn O´Garro, Diane Thompson, Floyd E. Hayes, and Urmila S. Nandy........................................................................................................................................ 18 APPARENT N ESTING OF S OUTHERN L APWING ON A RUBA . Steven G. Mlodinow................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for the Kansan Spikerush Leafhopper (Dorydiella Kansana Beamer)
    Conservation Assessment For The Kansan spikerush leafhopper (Dorydiella kansana Beamer) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region January 11, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Surveys in Serranía De Los Churumbelos, Southern Colombia
    Ornithological surveys in Serranía de los Churumbelos, southern Colombia Paul G. W . Salaman, Thomas M. Donegan and Andrés M. Cuervo Cotinga 12 (1999): 29– 39 En el marco de dos expediciones biológicos y Anglo-Colombian conservation expeditions — ‘Co­ conservacionistas anglo-colombianas multi-taxa, s lombia ‘98’ and the ‘Colombian EBA Project’. Seven llevaron a cabo relevamientos de aves en lo Serranía study sites were investigated using non-systematic de los Churumbelos, Cauca, en julio-agosto 1988, y observations and standardised mist-netting tech­ julio 1999. Se estudiaron siete sitios enter en 350 y niques by the three authors, with Dan Davison and 2500 m, con 421 especes registrados. Presentamos Liliana Dávalos in 1998. Each study site was situ­ un resumen de los especes raros para cada sitio, ated along an altitudinal transect at c. 300- incluyendo los nuevos registros de distribución más m elevational steps, from 350–2500 m on the Ama­ significativos. Los resultados estabilicen firme lo zonian slope of the Serranía. Our principal aim was prioridad conservacionista de lo Serranía de los to allow comparisons to be made between sites and Churumbelos, y aluco nos encontramos trabajando with other biological groups (mammals, herptiles, junto a los autoridades ambientales locales con insects and plants), and, incorporating geographi­ cuiras a lo protección del marcizo. cal and anthropological information, to produce a conservation assessment of the region (full results M e th o d s in Salaman et al.4). A sizeable part of eastern During 14 July–17 August 1998 and 3–22 July 1999, Cauca — the Bota Caucana — including the 80-km- ornithological surveys were undertaken in Serranía long Serranía de los Churumbelos had never been de los Churumbelos, Department of Cauca, by two subject to faunal surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation and Genetic Structure in the Bahama Oriole (Icterus Northropi), a Critically Endangered Synanthropic Species
    Geographic variation and genetic structure in the Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi), a critically endangered synanthropic species Melissa R. Price1,2 , Carl Person3 and William K. Hayes3 1 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa,¯ Honolulu, HI, United States 2 Kewalo Marine Laboratory, Pacific Biosciences Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States 3 Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States ABSTRACT Bird species may exhibit unexpected population structuring over small distances, with gene flow restricted by geographic features such as water or mountains. The Bahama Oriole (Icterus northropi) is a critically endangered, synanthropic island endemic with a declining population of fewer than 300 individuals. It now remains only on Andros Island (The Bahamas), which is riddled with waterways that past studies assumed did not hinder gene flow. We examined 1,858 base pairs of mito- chondrial DNA sequenced from four gene regions in 14 birds (roughly 5% of the remaining population) found on the largest land masses of Andros Island (North Andros and Mangrove Cay/South Andros). We sought to discern genetic structuring between the remaining subpopulations and its relationship to current conservation concerns. Four unique haplotypes were identified, with only one shared between the two subpopulations. Nucleotide and haplotype diversity were higher for the North Andros subpopulation than for the Mangrove Cay/South Andros subpopulation. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) yielded a Wright’s fixation indexF ( / of Submitted 25 August 2015 st Accepted 2 November 2015 0.60 (PFst D 0:016), with 40.2% of the molecular variation explained by within- Published 26 November 2015 population diVerences and 59.8% by among-population diVerences.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2011 Angel Wings
    Angel Wings A monthly journal for human angels who make a positive difference in companion birds' lives. September 2011 Volume 6, Issue IX Having trouble viewing this email? View as a Web Page Angel Toys For Angels September's Featured Toys In this month's issue: Angel Announcements Roasted Cauliflower Fishy Fun Recycling, Angel Style Medium Birds Featured Fid ~ Lineolated Parakeets Cleaning Cotton & Sisal Boings Angel Tips Rikki Sez Bedding for Nest Boxes Sterilizing Pine Cones Converting to a Healthy Diet Become a Volunteer Help Us Caged Balls Medium - Large Birds Button Chimes Small Birds Check out all the Angel Toys for Angels now! ANGEL ANNOUNCEMENTS Recycling, Angel Style Watch for upcoming events, news, website Funnel Fun updates, etc. here By Wyspur Kallis Funnel Fun ON THE SITE: Supplies you will need: Plastic Funnel - your choice of size ♥ New Items ♥ Whiffle Ball Cotton Supreme Rope™ ** ♥ Happy Flappers ♥ Pear link or baby link for hanging Masking Tape Scissors & Pliers ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ Whenever using cotton rope, put a small piece of tape on the ends to prevent unraveling. String the rope through the funnel. Roasted Cauliflower for Parronts and their birds By Toni Fortin This cauliflower tastes so good, a bit spicy & sweet. Thread the rope through the large opening of 1/2 head of cauliflower the funnel, then through the whiffle ball. Tie a Olive oil knot in the rope. Remove the masking tape Red pepper flakes from the knotted end. Cut washed cauliflower in pieces. Dry with paper towels. Put cauliflower in a bowl, drizzle with olive oil to coat. Add a couple shakes of red papper flakes and toss gently.
    [Show full text]