Strictly Confidential: the Private Volker Fund Memos of Murray N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strictly Confidential: the Private Volker Fund Memos of Murray N Strictly Confidential: The Private Volker Fund Memos of Murray N. Rothbard Strictly Confidential: The Private Volker Fund Memos of Murray N. Rothbard Edited by David Gordon Foreword by Brian Doherty © 2010 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute and published under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Ludwig von Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 mises.org ISBN: 978-1-933550-80-0 Table of Contents Foreword by Brian Doherty. .ix Introduction by David Gordon . 1 I. Setting the Stage. 7 Rothbard’s Confidential Memorandum to the Volker Fund, “What Is to Be Done?” . 7 II. Political Theory . 25 1. Are Libertarians “Anarchists”? . 25 2. In Defense of Demagogues . 32 3. Willmoore Kendall, Lectures on Democratic Theory at Buck Hill Falls . 35 4. Review of Charles L. Black, Jr., The People and the Court: Judicial Review in a Democracy . .51 5. Review of Leon Bramson, The Political Context of Sociology . 55 6. Review of Charles Percy Snow, Science and Government . 59 7. Report on the Voegelin Panel . 62 III. History. 69 1. Marxism and Charles Beard. 69 2. Review of Jackson Turner Main, The Antifederalists. 75 3. Review of R.W. Van Alstyne, The Rising American Empire. 80 4. Review of Robert V. Remini, Martin Van Buren and the Making of the Democratic Party. 82 5. Report on George B. DeHuszar and Thomas Hulbert Stevenson, A History of the American Republic, 2 vols. 86 v vi Strictly Confidential 6. Review of Douglass C. North, The Economic Growth of the United States, 1790–1860 . .188 7. Review of William Appleman Williams, The Tragedy of American Diplomacy . .193 8. Review of Edgar Eugene Robinson, The Hoover Leadership . .197 9. Review of Paul W. Schroeder, The Axis Alliance and Japanese-American Relations, 1941 . 200 10. Review of J. Fred Rippy, Globe and Hemisphere . 203 11. Review of the Veritas Foundation, Keynes at Harvard.. 208 12. Review of Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition . .215 13. Review of T.S. Ashton, An Economic History of England: The Eighteenth Century . .218 IV. Economics . 223 1. Spotlight on Keynesian Economics . 223 2. Fisher’s Equation of Exchange: A Critique . .240 3. Note on the Infant-Industry Argument . .249 4. Report on Ronald Coase Lectures . 253 5. Review of Lawrence Abbott, Quality and Competition and Anthony Scott, Natural Resources: The Economics of Conservation . 257 6. On the Definition of Money . 259 7. Review of John Chamberlain, The Roots of Capitalism . 265 8. Letter on Henry Hazlitt and Keynes . 277 9. Business Advocacy of Government Intervention . .279 10. Review of Lionel Robbins, The Great Depression. 289 11. Review of Lionel Robbins, Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics . .292 12. Untitled Letter Critical of Chicago School Economics . .295 13. Review of Benjamin Anderson, The Value of Money . .301 14. Review of Colin Clark, Growthmanship . 302 15. Competition and the Economists. 307 Table of Contents vii V. Foreign Policy. 321 1. For a New Isolationism . .321 2. Review of Alan S. Whiting, China Crosses the Yalu. .327 3. Review of Frank S. Meyer, The Moulding of Communists . .332 4. Critique of Frank S. Meyer’s Memorandum . 343 5. Review of Walter Millis (ed.), A World Without War . .375 6. Review of George F. Kennan, Russia and the West Under Lenin and Stalin . .379 VI. Literature. 383 1. Romanticism and Modern Fiction . 383 2. Letter on Recommended Novels . .392 3. Review of Edmund Fuller, Man in Modern Fiction. .395 Index . 399 Foreword I never met Murray Rothbard. Because I am the author of Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement, that was highly unfortunate. More than any other person, Murray Rothbard was the modern American libertarian movement. Intellectually, he was the most prolific and active advocate and scholar for the ideas and concerns that most vividly mark libertari- anism as a distinct tendency and movement; he brought together Austrian economics, natural-rights ethics, anarchist politics, and a burning interest in history—in the actual facts of the intellectual heri- tage of antistate thinking, and of how and why in specific incidents governments oppress and rob the bulk of the populace. Institutionally, he helped form or worked closely with every sig- nificant libertarian group or organization from the 1940s to the 1990s, from the Foundation for Economic Education to the Volker Fund, to the Institute for Humane Studies, to the Libertarian Party, to the Center for Libertarian Studies, to the Cato Institute to the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Every other significant libertarian thinker was personally influ- enced by him or felt obligated to grapple with him where they dis- agreed, from Leonard Read to Robert Nozick. When it comes to modern American libertarianism, Rothbard was the Man. That I was not able to meet him and get his fresh words into my book is my greatest regret associated with it. ix x Strictly Confidential This does not mean that my book was not shaped by Rothbard’s words or interpretations. He was also the most prolific and thought- ful theorist of institutional and movement libertarianism. From the 1950s to the 1990s, he wrote on where the movement had been, where it was going, and what he thought it needed to do. He left hundreds of thousands of words of great insights on these matters, words that are sometimes general and theoretical and often—especially in the pages of his great 1968–84 journal, Libertarian Forum—precise and personal. As a researcher into libertarianism, I was greatly fortunate to have not only his many, many published essays, columns, and interviews to rely on for Rothbard’s thoughts and actions; the Mises Institute, the repository of Rothbard’s library and papers, granted me wide- ranging access to his heretofore unpublished memos, essays, and let- ters. These documents are a treasure well beyond my comparatively parochial needs in researching my book. They are a joyful alternative career of Rothbard’s writings and research, and as such inherently one of the most valuable (and most fun) intellectual resources of the past century. David Gordon—probably the only man around who knows as much about as much as Rothbard did when it comes to the histori- cal, philosophical, and economic background of libertarianism—has compiled this new book of letters, memos, and reviews from Rothbard on the value—and often on the libertarian bona fides—of dozens of thinkers and books that came to the attention of the Volker Fund and Volker-associated groups such as the National Book Foundation, which helped promote and publish libertarian-friendly scholars and scholarship in an age when it was welcome almost nowhere. The reader of this book—and of editor Gordon’s introduction— will find out for themselves in the best way possible the scope of what Rothbard accomplishes here. There are useful and rich nuggets covering every aspect of Rothbard’s intellectual project, starting with his bold call for the necessity of a pure and unsullied libertarian set of institutions and activists. I was most delighted to notice subtle little throughlines that help remind the reader of Rothbard’s perspicacity (his consistent recognition Foreword xi of the not-to-be-forgotten distinctions between the modern libertarian and the modern conservative or right-winger) and of the disciplined humane concern that could almost be said to constitute the heart of Rothbard: his recognition, from the War of 1812 to the Cold War and every war in between (no matter how beloved by historians nowadays), that the monstrous crime of state-launched murder and rapine and destruction so blithely called “war” has been the greatest enemy not only of life but of American liberty. Rothbard wrote a wonderful four-volume history of colonial America, published as Conceived in Liberty. His fans have long wished he had managed a full-on history of America. He never had the time to do so. But in this volume’s bravura centerpiece, disguised as a simple book-review memo of George B. DeHuszar and Thomas Hulbert Stevenson’s A History of the American Republic, we have in essence at least the outline or study guide to one. It’s a marvelously detailed step-by-step discussion of the primary points, personalities, and con- troversies in American history that should most interest the historian who loves liberty. How I wish someone could add more meat to this already strong and imposing skeleton of an American history. Alas, the man who had the knowledge and stamina and proper perspec- tive to do so left us in 1995. I never met Murray Rothbard. Likely you didn’t either. But most especially in this book—because of its immense range, its private purpose, and its easy and wide erudition—you are meeting the man at his finest: impassioned, funny, learned, brilliant, unfoolable, relentless. I advise you to read this with pen and notebook in hand. Rothbard is going to teach you so many things, in so many unforget- table formulations, that you are going to want to take note of them; just as Rothbard, in his decades of staggering reading and thinking, took notes for us, and passed on his insights tirelessly. That benefit accrues now not just to his friends and colleagues who sought his advice on matters libertarian in years gone by, advice solidified in these memos; thanks to Gordon and the Mises Institute, that benefit is for the ages. xii Strictly Confidential Writing from the 2010 perspective of the “Ron Paul Revolution,” the first mass-political movement to make a splash in America in our times—a movement clearly animated by Rothbardian style and ideas about currency, war, and the evils of the state—I believe the ages will more and more note Rothbard and his message.
Recommended publications
  • All-Left.Net Alliance Aims to Be a Movement Journal for the Alliance Of
    all-left.net This Radical Reprint brought to you by: ALLiance Journal ALLiance Journal: a grassroots, shop-floor, dirt cheap, tabloid aspiring to inspire the Left-Libertarian Movement to delusions of grandeur. We are full of piss and passion; and we will never stop even in the face of singularity, peak oil or Ragnarok. Check us out at alliancejournal.net or libertyactivism.info. ALLiance aims to be a movement journal for the Alliance of the Libertarian Left (ALL). The Alliance of the Libertarian Left is a multi-tendency coalition of mutu- alists, agorists, voluntaryists, geolibertarians, left-Rothbardians, green libertarians, dialectical anarchists, radical minarchists, and others on the libertarian left, united by an opposition to statism and militarism, to cultural intolerance (including sexism, racism, and homophobia), and to the prevailing corporatist capitalism falsely called a free market; as Advocates of Freed Markets Should Embrace “Anti-Capitalism” well as by an emphasis on education, direct action, and building alterna- tive institutions, rather than on electoral politics, as our chief strategy Gary Chartier for achieving liberation. Radical Reprints The Conscience of an Anarchist, Studies in Mutualist Political Economy by C4SS Advisory Panel member Gary Chartier by C4SS writer and researcher Kevin A. Carson A compelling case for a stateless society. Anarchists tend to look embarrassed when the sub- ject of economics comes up. Or we mumble some- Anarchy happens when people organize their lives thing about Proudhon and then sheepishly borrow peacefully and voluntarily — without the aggres- ideas from Karl Marx.... A specifically anarchistic sive violence of the state. This simple but powerful approach to economic analysis has lain dormant for book explains why the state is illegitimate, unneces- the last 130 years.
    [Show full text]
  • William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner
    The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner by Dante Joseph Basista Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2019 The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner Dante Joseph Basista I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Dante Basista, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Donna DeBlasio, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT This is a study of the correspondence and published writings of three-time Democratic Presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan in relation to his role in the anti-imperialist movement that opposed the US acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War. Historians have disagreed over whether Bryan was genuine in his opposition to an American empire in the 1900 presidential election and have overlooked the period following the election in which Bryan’s editorials opposing imperialism were a major part of his weekly newspaper, The Commoner. The argument is made that Bryan was authentic in his opposition to imperialism in the 1900 presidential election, as proven by his attention to the issue in the two years following his election loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Zora Neale Hurston on War, Race, the State, and Liberty
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Zora Neale Hurston on War, Race, the State, and Liberty ✦ DAVID T. BEITO AND LINDA ROYSTER BEITO he ideals of liberty, individualism, and self-reliance have rarely had more enthusiastic champions than Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Zora TNeale Hurston. All three were out of step with the dominant worldview of their times. They had their peak professional years during the New Deal and World War II, when faith in big government was at high tide.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrupt Bargain" Charge Against Clay and Adams
    THE "CORRUPT BARGAIN" CHARGE AGAINST CLAY AND ADAMS: AN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS BY WILLIAM G. MORGAN Oral Roberts University Tulsa, Oklahoma The election of 1824 provided a substantial portion of the ground- work for the notable political changes which emerged from the some- what misnamed "Era of Good Feelings," while at the same time involv- ing several unusual political phenomena. A cardinal feature of this electoral struggle was the large number of prominent candidates. Early in the contest the serious contenders totaled as many as "16 or 17," in- cluding William H. Crawford, Secretary of the Treasury; John Quincy Adams, Secretary of State; Henry Clay, long-time Speaker of the House; John C. Calhoun, Secretary of War; Smith Thompson, Secretary of the Navy; Vice-President Daniel D. Tompkins; Governor DeWitt Clinton of New York; Representative William Lowndes of South Carolina; and a comparative latecomer to politics, General Andrew Jackson] As the campaign progressed, several of these men dropped from conten- tion: Lowndes died in 1822, while Thompson, Tompkins, and Clinton fell from the ranks for lack of support, though there was mention of the latter's possible candidacy late in 1823.2 Calhoun subsequently withdrew from the race, deciding to delay his bid for the presidency to accept the second office.8 Of the prominent contenders remaining in the contest, Crawford was the administration favorite, and his position as Treasury Secretary had enabled him to build a significant following in various circles.4 Despite these advantages, Crawford's success proved illusory: among other difficulties, the Georgian suffered a severe stroke in the summer of 1823 and was the victim of the growing antagonism toward the caucus, the very insti- nation on which he was relying to bring him broad party support.5 Adams, Clay, and Jackson fought actively to secure an electoral majority or, failing that, to gain sufficient votes to be included in the top three who would be presented to the House of Representatives for the final decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Rousas John Rushdoony: a Brief History, Part V Year-End Sale Martin Selbrede “An Opportunity
    Faith for All of Life September/October 2016 Publisher & Chalcedon President Editorials Rev. Mark R. Rushdoony 2 From the President Chalcedon Vice-President Rousas John Rushdoony: A Brief History, Part V Year-End Sale Martin Selbrede “An Opportunity... Thanks Be to God!” 30% OFF Editor 20 From the Founder All orders thru Martin Selbrede 2 Corinthians, Godly Social Order Jan. 31, 2017 Managing Editor The True Perspective (2 Cor. 4:8-18) Susan Burns Features Contributing Editor Lee Duigon 7 Rousas John Rushdoony as Philosopher Jean-Marc Berthoud Chalcedon Founder Rev. R. J. Rushdoony 14 Rushdoony on History (1916-2001) Otto J. Scott was the founder of Chalcedon 17 For Such a Time as This and a leading theologian, church/ state expert, and author of Andrea Schwartz numerous works on the applica- Columns tion of Biblical Law to society. 19 Fragile World Receiving Faith for All of Life: This Movie Reviewed by Lee Duigon magazine will be sent to those who request it. At least once a year we ask 23 The Sleeping Princess of Nulland by Aaron Jagt that you return a response card if you Book Reviewed by Lee Duigon wish to remain on the mailing list. Subscriptions are $20 per year ($35 27 Product Catalog (YEAR-END SALE! Save 30% on all orders for Canada; $45 for International). through January 31, 2017) Checks should be made out to Chalcedon and mailed to P.O. Box 158, Vallecito, CA 95251 USA. Chalcedon may want to contact its readers quickly by means of e-mail. Faith for All of Life, published bi-monthly by Chalcedon, a tax-exempt Christian foundation, is sent to all who If you have an e-mail address, please request it.
    [Show full text]
  • Read-I-Pencil.Pdf
    There is no better, more easily understood, and more fun explanation of the complexity of markets than Leonard Read’s “I, Pencil.” It ought to give considerable pause when we listen to the arrogance of politicians who tell us they can manage an economy better than millions, perhaps billions, of independent decision makers in pursuit of their own goals. Its message to would-be planners is to bug out! WALTER E. WILLIAMS PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS • GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY “I, Pencil” is a superb case study of free markets in action. Half of the world’s economic problems would vanish if everyone would read “I, Pencil.” BURTON W. FOLSOM PROFESSOR OF HISTORY • HILLSDALE COLLEGE What have economists contributed to human knowledge? Plenty, but the magical, beautiful idea of the division of labor might rank as the most important insight. “I, Pencil” explains we create so much more wealth as a community than we ever could alone - in fact, even the simplest item cannot be made without a complex division of labor. JEFFREY A. TUCKER DIRECTOR OF DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT • FEE “I, Pencil” provides remarkable insights into the complexity generated by market mechanisms. Textbook economics almost never incorporates these insights. MICHAEL STRONG CO-FOUNDER • CONSCIOUS CAPITALISM CEO • RADICAL SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS FEE’s mission is to inspire, educate, and connect future leaders with the economic, ethical, and legal principles of a free society. Join us online at: FEE.org Facebook.com/FEEonline Twitter.com/FEEonline (@feeonline) Foundation for Economic Education 1819 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 300 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: (404) 554-9980 Print ISBN: 978-1-57246-043-0 Ebook ISBN: 978-1-57246-042-3 Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • National History Bowl National Championships Playoff Round 5
    National History Bowl National Championships Playoff Round 5 Round: Supergroup Group Room: Reader: Scorekeep: Team Names, including letter designation if needed, go in the large boxes to the right. TU# Bonus Bonus Points Cumulative Score Bonus Points Cumulative Score 1 Quarter 1 2 Tossups Only 3 4 Put a "10" in the 5 column of the team 6 that answers correctly. 7 Otherwise leave box 8 blank. 9 10 1 Quarter 2 2 Tossups and bonuses 3 Put "10" in the team's 4 column. Otherwise, 5 leave box blank. 6 For bonuses, put "0" or 7 Substitutions allowed between Qtrs all "10" in the bonus 8 column. 9 10 Quarter 3 points points 60 sec. rds - trailing team Lightning Lightning goes first. 10 pts each. Bounceback Bounceback 20 pt bonus for sweep! Total Total 1 Quarter 4 2 Tossups worth 30, 20, or 3 10 points each 4 Put the appropriate 5 number in the column of 6 the team that answers 7 correctly. Otherwise leave 8 box blank. 9 10 Tiebreakers 1 Tiebreak questions Tie Breaker (Sudden are only used 2 have no point value Victory) to determine winner! 3 at all! Final Score NHBB Nationals Bowl 2017-2018 Bowl Playoff Packet 5 Bowl Playoff Packet 5 First Quarter (1) This meeting affirmed the excommunication of Philip the Amorous of France, who had claimed that his wife Bertha was too fat and scandalously remarried Bertrade of Montfort. This meeting was prompted by Byzantine envoys to the Council of Piacenza earlier the same year. Robert the Monk claimed that the audience erupted into cries of \God wills it!" after a speech at this meeting called for the conquest of the Holy Land.
    [Show full text]
  • Mere Libertarianism: Blending Hayek and Rothbard
    Mere Libertarianism: Blending Hayek and Rothbard Daniel B. Klein Santa Clara University The continued progress of a social movement may depend on the movement’s being recognized as a movement. Being able to provide a clear, versatile, and durable definition of the movement or philosophy, quite apart from its justifications, may help to get it space and sympathy in public discourse. 1 Some of the most basic furniture of modern libertarianism comes from the great figures Friedrich Hayek and Murray Rothbard. Like their mentor Ludwig von Mises, Hayek and Rothbard favored sweeping reductions in the size and intrusiveness of government; both favored legal rules based principally on private property, consent, and contract. In view of the huge range of opinions about desirable reform, Hayek and Rothbard must be regarded as ideological siblings. Yet Hayek and Rothbard each developed his own ideas about liberty and his own vision for a libertarian movement. In as much as there are incompatibilities between Hayek and Rothbard, those seeking resolution must choose between them, search for a viable blending, or look to other alternatives. A blending appears to be both viable and desirable. In fact, libertarian thought and policy analysis in the United States appears to be inclined toward a blending of Hayek and Rothbard. At the center of any libertarianism are ideas about liberty. Differences between libertarianisms usually come down to differences between definitions of liberty or between claims made for liberty. Here, in exploring these matters, I work closely with the writings of Hayek and Rothbard. I realize that many excellent libertarian philosophers have weighed in on these matters and already said many of the things I say here.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, and the RECONSTRUCTION of CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented In
    NEW CITIZENS: GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alison Clark Efford, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Doctoral Examination Committee: Professor John L. Brooke, Adviser Approved by Professor Mitchell Snay ____________________________ Adviser Professor Michael L. Benedict Department of History Graduate Program Professor Kevin Boyle ABSTRACT This work explores how German immigrants influenced the reshaping of American citizenship following the Civil War and emancipation. It takes a new approach to old questions: How did African American men achieve citizenship rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments? Why were those rights only inconsistently protected for over a century? German Americans had a distinctive effect on the outcome of Reconstruction because they contributed a significant number of votes to the ruling Republican Party, they remained sensitive to European events, and most of all, they were acutely conscious of their own status as new American citizens. Drawing on the rich yet largely untapped supply of German-language periodicals and correspondence in Missouri, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., I recover the debate over citizenship within the German-American public sphere and evaluate its national ramifications. Partisan, religious, and class differences colored how immigrants approached African American rights. Yet for all the divisions among German Americans, their collective response to the Revolutions of 1848 and the Franco-Prussian War and German unification in 1870 and 1871 left its mark on the opportunities and disappointments of Reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Worries About the Coherence of Left-Libertarianism Mathias Risse
    John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series Can There be “Libertarianism without Inequality”? Some Worries About the Coherence of Left-Libertarianism Mathias Risse Nov 2003 RWP03-044 The views expressed in the KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or Harvard University. All works posted here are owned and copyrighted by the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. Can There be “Libertarianism without Inequality”? Some Worries About the Coherence of Left-Libertarianism1 Mathias Risse John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University October 25, 2003 1. Left-libertarianism is not a new star on the sky of political philosophy, but it was through the recent publication of Peter Vallentyne and Hillel Steiner’s anthologies that it became clearly visible as a contemporary movement with distinct historical roots. “Left- libertarian theories of justice,” says Vallentyne, “hold that agents are full self-owners and that natural resources are owned in some egalitarian manner. Unlike most versions of egalitarianism, left-libertarianism endorses full self-ownership, and thus places specific limits on what others may do to one’s person without one’s permission. Unlike right- libertarianism, it holds that natural resources may be privately appropriated only with the permission of, or with a significant payment to, the members of society. Like right- libertarianism, left-libertarianism holds that the basic rights of individuals are ownership rights. Left-libertarianism is promising because it coherently underwrites both some demands of material equality and some limits on the permissible means of promoting this equality” (Vallentyne and Steiner (2000a), p 1; emphasis added).
    [Show full text]
  • The Neglect of the French Liberal School in Anglo-American Economics: a Critique of Received Explanations
    The Neglect of the French Liberal School in Anglo-American Economics: A Critique of Received Explanations Joseph T. Salerno or roughly the first three quarters of the nineteenth century, the "liberal school" thoroughly dominated economic thinking and teaching in F France.1 Adherents of the school were also to be found in the United States and Italy, and liberal doctrines exercised a profound influence on prominent German and British economists. Although its numbers and au- thority began to dwindle after the 1870s, the school remained active and influential in France well into the 1920s. Even after World War II, there were a few noteworthy French economists who could be considered intellectual descendants of the liberal tradition. Despite its great longevity and wide-ranging influence, the scientific con- tributions of the liberal school and their impact on the development of Eu- ropean and U.S. economic thought—particularly on those economists who are today recognized as the forerunners, founders, and early exponents of marginalist economics—have been belittled or simply ignored by most twen- tieth-century Anglo-American economists and historians of thought. A number of doctrinal scholars, including Joseph Schumpeter, have noted and attempted to explain the curious neglect of the school in the En- glish-language literature. In citing the school's "analytical sterility" or "indif- ference to pure theory" as a main cause of its neglect, however, their expla- nations have overlooked a salient fact: that many prominent contributors to economic analysis throughout the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries expressed strong appreciation of or weighty intellectual debts to the purely theoretical contributions of the liberal school.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Excerpt (Pdf)
    7 Pro-Business Policies as Ideology . when I was a young man, only the very old men still believed in the free-market system. When I was in my middle ages I myself and nobody else believed in it. And now I have the pleasure of having lived long enough to see that the young people again believe in it. And that is a very important change. FRIEDRICH VON HAYEK, 19781 Ideologies perform essential political functions of informing the public, mobilising supporters and energising leaders and other activists . An effective ideology will mobilise political supporters to share the general beliefs and goals of a party, interest group or politician. PETER SELF2 In 1947, a group of 37 like-minded people from the US, Britain and Europe – economists, historians and journalists – met in a fashionable resort at Mont Pèlerin in Switzerland. They had been invited there by Friedrich von Hayek, an Austrian-born economic theoretician who worked at the London School of Economics. Hayek’s 1944 book The Road to Serfdom, was said to be ‘the first intellectually respectable defense of free-market doctrine to have appeared in decades’. The book, which argued that government planning leads to dictatorship and that free markets should reign, was republished in condensed form by Reader’s Digest. The Book-of-the-Month Club distributed over a million copies. In it Hayek looked back to the glories of free market England in the 19th century, ignoring the mass poverty and atrocious working conditions of the ‘dark satanic mills’. Nor did he recognize the role of colonies, tariffs, export bounties and government legislation in maintaining this laissez-faire idyll.3 Joining Hayek at Mont Pèlerin was Ludwig von Mises, an Austrian libertarian economist and mentor to Hayek, whose writings at this time were being promoted and disseminated by the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE – see Chapter 4); Leonard Reed who had founded the FEE in the previous year; and Henry Hazlitt, FEE vice-president.
    [Show full text]