Supplement of Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1533–1555, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1533-2020-supplement © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of Contrasting seismic risk for Santiago, Chile, from near-field and distant earthquake sources Ekbal Hussain et al. Correspondence to: Ekbal Hussain (
[email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. 71.0°W 70.0°W 1. Santiago 2. 3. 4. Providencia 33.0°S 5. 6. 7. San Joaquin 8. 9. Pedro Aguirre Cerda 10. 11. Quinta Normal 32 31 12. 30 13 3 29 13. Conchali 12 2 14 11 4 14. Cerro Navia 15 28 10 1 5 15. 27 16 9 8 7 6 16. Cerrillos 17 18 22 26 21 17. Lo Espejo 33 19 18. 20 25 23 19. 24 20. La Pintana 21. San Ramon 22. La Granja 23. 24. Calera de Tango 25. 26. 27. Penalolen 28. 29. Las Condes 30. 31. Huechuraba 34.0°S 33.5°S 32. 33. 0 10 20 30 40 km 71.0°W 70.0°W Figure S1. Map showing the communes of the Santiago Metropolitan Region and the distribution of the residential building exposure model used in the risk calculations. The exposure model is downsampled to a 1×1 km grid from Santa-María et al. (2017). The red lines indicate the surface trace of the San Ramón fault used in the seismic risk scenario calculations, and the dashed cyan the buried fault splay.